An rf communications system includes a transmit node for transmitting an rf information signal and a receive node for receiving the transmitted rf information signal. The receive node includes a passive mixer coupled to an amplifier for producing an IF or baseband differential mixer output signal as a function of a lo drive signal. The passive mixer having a first plurality of transistors of a first polarity type arranged in a ring configuration and a second plurality of transistors of a second polarity type, wherein each of second plurality of transistors is coupled to one of the first plurality of transistors.

Patent
   6989705
Priority
Mar 06 2003
Filed
Oct 26 2004
Issued
Jan 24 2006
Expiry
Mar 06 2023
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
2
13
all paid
4. An rf circuit comprising:
a differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors, each coupled between a positive voltage source and a ground through an inductive load for producing a differential lo drive signal for driving a mixer responsive to a different input signal;
an lo buffer voltage limiter coupled to first and second buffer outputs of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors to limit a common mode voltage of the differential lo drive; and
an lo buffer bias circuit coupled to gate electrodes of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo butter transistors.
1. An rf circuit comprising:
a differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors, each coupled between a positive voltage source and a ground through an inductive load for producing a differential lo drive signal for driving a mixer responsive to a different input signal;
a limiter coupled to lo buffer outputs to limit a common mode voltage of the differential lo drive signal; and
a bias circuit coupled to the gate electrodes of said lo buffer transistors to provide biasing voltage at the gate electrodes of the lo buffer transistors,
wherein the mixer comprises a passive mixer, and wherein the passive mixer comprises:
a first plurality of transistors of a first type arranged in a ring configuration; and
a second plurality of transistors of a second type,
wherein each of the second plurality of transistors is coupled to a corresponding one of the first plurality of transistors, and
wherein the passive mixer produces a differential mixer output signal.
8. An rf circuit for producing a differential lo drive signal for driving a mixer, the mixer receiving an input signal and producing a differential mixer output signal using the input signal and the differential lo drive signal, the rf circuit comprising:
a positive voltage source;
a ground;
a differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors, each coupled between the positive voltage source and the ground through an inductive load, each of the pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors comprising a gate electrode;
a limiter coupled to lo buffer outputs to limit a common mode voltage of the differential lo drive signal;
a node coupled between the gate electrodes of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors; and
an lo buffer bias circuit coupled to the node,
wherein, when one of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors is powered off by a first buffer drive signal, the other differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors is powered on by a second buffer drive signal.
15. An rf communication system, comprising:
a transmit node for transmitting an rf information signal; and
a receive node for receiving the transmitted rf information signal, and for producing an IF differential mixer output signal using the received rf information signal, the receive node including a passive mixer coupled to an amplifier and an lo buffer for producing a differential lo drive signal for driving the mixer responsive to a differential input signal, the lo buffer comprising:
a positive voltage source;
a ground;
a differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors, each coupled between the positive voltage source and the ground through an inductive load; and
a limiter coupled to lo buffer outputs to limit a common mode voltage of the differential lo drive signal; and
a bias circuit coupled to the gate electrodes of said lo buffer transistors to provide biasing voltage at the gate electrodes of the lo buffer transistors,
wherein the passive mixer produces the IF differential mixer output signal as a function of the drive signal and the received rf information signal, and wherein the passive mixer comprises:
a first plurality of transistors of a first type arranged in a ring configuration; and
a second plurality of transistors of a second type;
wherein each of the second plurality of transistors is coupled to a corresponding one of the first plurality of transistors.
2. The rf circuit of claim 1, wherein the differential mixer output signal comprises an IF signal and wherein the IF signal is produced by the passive mixer as a function of the differential lo drive signal and an rf information signal received by the passive mixer.
3. The rf circuit of claim 1, wherein the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors comprise NMOS FETS.
5. The rf circuit of claim 4, wherein the voltage limiter comprises first and second shunt capacitors, and wherein the first shunt capacitor is coupled to the first buffer output of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors and the second shunt capacitor is coupled to the second buffer output of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors.
6. The rf circuit of claim 4, wherein the voltage limiter comprises first and second resistors, and wherein the first resistor is coupled between a node of the common mode voltage and the first buffer output of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors and the second resistor is coupled between the node of the common mode voltage and the second buffer output of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors.
7. The rf circuit of claim 6, wherein the voltage limiter comprises first and second capacitors, and wherein the first capacitor is commonly coupled to the first buffer output of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors with the first resistor and the second capacitor is commonly coupled to the second buffer output of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors with the second resistor.
9. The rf circuit of claim 8, wherein the lo buffer bias circuit comprises a pair of lo buffer bias resistors and an lo buffer biasing source and wherein the lo buffer biasing source is coupled to the gate electrodes of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors via the pair of lo buffer bias resistors.
10. The rf circuit of claim 9, wherein the lo buffer biasing source comprises a current source and a MOS transistor having a gate and a source, wherein the gate of the MOS transistor is coupled to the gate electrodes of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors via the pair of lo buffer bias resistors, and wherein the current source is electrically coupled to both the gate and the source of the MOS transistor.
11. The rf circuit of claim 10, wherein an aspect ratio of each of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors is about K times larger than an aspect ratio of the MOS transistor.
12. The rf circuit of claim 8, wherein the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors comprise NMOS FETS.
13. The rf circuit of claim 8, wherein each of the differential pair of lo buffer transistors further comprises a drain and a source, wherein the drain of each of the differential pair of lo butter transistors is coupled to a transistor, and wherein the source of each of the differential pair of lo buffer transistors is coupled together and to the ground.
14. The rf circuit of claim 8, further comprising an impedance coupled between the positive voltage source and the inductively loaded lo buffer transistors to limit a common mode voltage of the differential lo drive signal.
16. The rf communication system of claim 15, wherein each of the differential pair of inductively loaded lo buffer transistors and the first plurality of transistors comprises an n-type transistor and wherein each of the second plurality of transistors comprises a p-type transistor.

This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/382,811, filed on Mar. 6, 2003, and entitled “HIGH LINEARITY PASSIVE MIXER AND ASSOCIATED LO BUFFER,” the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.

This invention generally relates to communication systems and more particularly relates to high linearity intermediate frequency stages for RF communication systems.

Communication networks such as wireless networks for transmitting data and audio information are increasingly in use. Typically, transceivers for wireless nodes are superheterodyne radio frequency (RF) receivers that mix the received signal with a local oscillator (LO) signal to down-convert the received signal (e.g., the RF signal) to one or more intermediate frequency (IF) signals. The IF signals have fixed, or at least restricted, frequencies which allow the IF signals to be more easily filtered, amplified, and otherwise processed.

Mixers are typically used to translate the received RF signal in frequency by combining the received signal with a Local Oscillator (LO) signal to create an output signal at either the sum (fRF+fLO) or the difference (fRF−fLO or fLO−fRF) of the input signals. Mixers may be either passive or active. Passive mixers are based on un-biased semiconductors. Passive mixer circuits generally exhibit a low noise figure and are highly linear over a relatively wide dynamic range.

However, passive mixer circuits generally require a relatively high power local oscillator drive signal as well as low noise IF amplification to compensate for relatively high insertion loss. For example, most passive mixers have a conversion loss on the order of 6 dB, a noise figure on the order of 6 dB, and an intercept point dependant on the amount of LO drive provided which is typically between 0 to +17 dBm for a passive mixer.

In one aspect of the present invention an RF communications circuit includes a first plurality of transistors of a first polarity type arranged in a ring configuration and a second plurality of transistors of a second polarity type. In this embodiment, a source electrode of each of the second plurality of transistors is coupled to a drain electrode of a different one of the first plurality of transistors and a drain electrode of each of the second plurality of transistors is coupled to a source electrode of a different one of the first plurality of transistors. The first and second plurality of transistors produce a mixer output signal and a complementary mixer output signal having a frequency which is a function of the frequency of an input signal and the frequency of the drive signal.

In another aspect of the present invention a RF communication circuit includes a first plurality of transistors of a first polarity type arranged in a ring configuration and a second plurality of transistors of a second polarity type. Each of the second plurality of transistors is coupled to a unique one of the first plurality of transistors. In addition an inductively loaded LO buffer for producing differential LO drive signals drives the first and second plurality of transistors In operation the first and second plurality of transistors produces an IF differential mixer output signal and a complementary mixer output signal.

In a further aspect of the present invention a RF communication circuit includes a differential pair of inductively loaded LO buffer transistors coupled between a positive voltage source and ground for producing a differential LO drive signal for driving a mixer.

In a still further aspect of the present invention an RF communications system includes a transmit node for transmitting an RF information signal and a receive node for receiving the transmitted RF information signal. The receive node includes a passive mixer coupled to an amplifier for producing an IF differential mixer output signal as a function of a LO drive signal. The passive mixer includes a first plurality of transistors of a first polarity type arranged in a ring configuration and a second plurality of transistors of a second polarity type, wherein each of the second plurality of transistors is coupled to a unique one of the first plurality of transistors.

The present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a simplified schematic diagram of a conventional passive mixer;

FIG. 2 is a graphical illustration of the on resistance of a Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (MOS) Field Effect Transistor (FET) as a function of the gate source voltage;

FIG. 3 is a simplified schematic diagram of a passive mixer having complementary PMOS transistors coupled to NMOS transistors in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a graphical illustration of the on resistance of an NMOS transistor, a PMOS transistor and the parallel resistance of the NMOS and PMOS transistors as a function of the absolute value of the gate source voltage;

FIG. 5 is a simplified block diagram of the passive mixer of FIG. 3 coupled to an inductively loaded high swing LO buffer in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a simplified schematic diagram of the inductively loaded high swing LO buffer of FIG. 5 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a simplified schematic diagram of the inductively loaded high swing LO buffer of FIG. 6 having a bias circuit coupled to inputs of the LO buffer in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 8 is a simplified schematic diagram of the inductively loaded high swing LO buffer of FIG. 5 wherein the outputs of the LO buffer are AC coupled in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a simplified schematic diagram of the inductively loaded high swing LO buffer of FIG. 5 having a resistor coupled between a positive voltage source and the inductive loads to limit the common mode voltage of the outputs of the LO buffer in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 10 is a simplified block diagram of an RF communications system having a transmit node and a receive node; and

FIG. 11 is a simplified block diagram of the receiver in the receiver node of the RF communication system of FIG. 10 in accordance with an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

An exemplary embodiment of the present invention includes a passive mixer in a high linearity IF stage for an RF communication system. FIG. 1 illustrates a simplified circuit diagram of a doubly balanced passive mixer having four FETs M1–M4, arranged in a ring configuration. During passive mixing the drain source bias VDS of FETs M1–m4 is approximately equal to zero so that each of the devices operate in the linear region and the channel resistance (i.e. the resistance between the source and drain) is of the devices is modulated with a large LO drive signal.

In this embodiment the sources of M3 and M4 are coupled to the sources of M1 and M2 respectively to form an IF mixer output 20 and a complementary IF mixer output 30. In addition, the drains of M1 and M2 are coupled to the RF input while the drains of M3 and M4 are coupled to the complement of the RF input (i.e. RF input shifted by 180 degrees). In this embodiment the resistance of the drain-source channels of FETs M1–M4 are controlled by the instantaneous voltage applied to their gate electrodes by the LO drive signal and its complement (i.e. LObar).

For example, during the first (positive) half of a sinusoidal LO cycle, the voltage applied to the gate electrodes of FETs M1 and M4 is increased, causing the drain-to-source resistances of FETs M1 and M4 to become very low. Therefore, the IF mixer output 20 is coupled to the RF input via FET M1 and the complement of the RF input is coupled to the complement of the IF mixer output 30 via M4 during the positive half of a LO drive signal cycle.

At the same time, the voltage applied to the gate electrodes of the other pair of FETS, M2 and M3, is decreased (due to the 180 degree phase shift of the LO signal component applied to those gate electrodes), driving FETs M2 and M3 into pinch-off. This causes the source-to-drain channels of FETs M2 and M3 to appear substantially as open-circuits during the positive half of a LO drive signal cycle.

The opposite occurs during the second or negative half of the sinusoidal LO drive signal cycle. That is, the gate voltage of FETs M2 and M3 is increased by the complement of the LO signal to produce low drain-to-source resistances for FETs M2 and M3, while the drain-to-source resistances of FETs M1 and M4 are driven very high by the instantaneous decrease in the gate voltage of FETs M1 and M4. Thus, the RF signal is coupled through FET M2 to the complementary IF mixer output 30 and the complement of the RF signal is coupled through FET M3 to the IF mixer output 20 during the second or negative half of the sinusoidal LO drive signal cycle.

In operation, therefore, the outputs 20 and 30 of the passive mixer switch between the RF input and the complement of the RF input (i.e. essentially between +/−1) at the LO frequency. The switching action of FETs M1–M4 in the time domain provides the desired frequency translation in the frequency domain. Therefore, the mixer converts the differential RF signal into a baseband signal or an intermediate frequency (IF) signal having a pair of components 180 degrees out of phase with each other.

However, FETs have a non-linear switch-on resistance as a function of gate-source voltage (VGS) as illustrated in FIG. 2. In addition, the sinusoidal LO drive signal and its complement have relatively small drive voltages for a significant part of their period. As a result the RF input signal may vary the switch-on resistance of FETs M1–M4 during the periods when the amplitude of the LO drive voltage is at a low level, thereby introducing distortion and insertion loss into the mixer output signals.

Therefore, an exemplary passive mixer 100, in accordance with the present invention, illustrated in FIG. 3, comprises complementary PMOS FETs M5–M8 coupled to the NMOS FETS M1–M4 respectively to reduce the resistance and loss associated with the switching transistors M1–M4. In the described exemplary embodiment the source electrode of each of the PMOS FETs M5–M8 is coupled to a drain electrode of a corresponding NMOS FET, M1–M4 respectively, and a drain electrode of each of the PMOS FETs M5–M8 is coupled to a source electrode of a corresponding NMOS FET, M1–M4 respectively.

In the described exemplary mixer 100 PMOS FETs M5 and M8 are driven by the complement of the LO drive signal and PMOS FETs M6 and M7 are driven by the LO drive signal. Therefore, during the first (positive) half of a sinusoidal LO drive signal cycle, the voltage applied to the gate electrodes of NMOS FETs M1 and M4 is increased, as is the negative voltage applied to the gate electrodes of PMOS FETs M5 and M8, reducing the drain-to-source resistances of FETs M1, M4, M5 and M8. The described exemplary embodiment therefore provides low impedance switches with on resistances equal to the parallel resistance of M1 and M5 and M4 and M8 during the positive half of a LO drive signal cycle. In this instance MOSFETs M1 and M5 couple the RF signal to the IF mixer output 20 and MOSFETs M4 and M8 couple the complement of the RF signal to the complement of the IF mixer output 30.

At the same time, the voltage applied to the gate electrodes of the other pair of NMOS FETs M2 and M3 and PMOS FETs M6 and M7 is decreased (due to the 180 degree phase shift of the LO drive signal component applied to those gate electrodes), driving. FETs M2, M3, M6 and M7 into pinch-off. This causes the source-to-drain channels of NMOS FETs M2 and M3 and PMOS FETs M6 and M7 to appear substantially as open-circuits during the positive half of a LO drive signal cycle.

The opposite again occurs during the second or negative half of the sinusoidal LO drive signal cycle. That is, the gate voltages of NMOS FETs M2 and M3 are increased by the complement of the LO drive signal to produce a low drain-to-source resistance for FETs M2 and M3, while the drain-to-source resistances of FETs M1 and M4 are driven very high by the instantaneous decrease in the gate voltage of FETs M1 and M4. Similarly, the gate voltage of PMOS FETs M6 and M7 are negative producing a low drain-to-source resistance for PMOS FETs M6 and M7, while the drain-to-source resistances of PMOS FETs M5 and M8 are driven very high by the instantaneous decrease in the gate voltage of PMOS FETs M5 and M8.

Therefore, the described exemplary embodiment provides low impedance switches whose on resistances are equal to the parallel impedance of M2 and M6 and M3 and M7 during the second or negative half of the sinusoidal LO drive signal cycle. In this embodiment the low impedance MOSFETs M2 and M6 couple the RF signal input to the complementary IF mixer output 30 and MOSFETs M3 and M7 couple the complement of the RF signal to the IF mixer output 20 respectively during the second or negative half of the sinusoidal LO signal cycle.

Thus the outputs 20 and 30 of the described exemplary passive mixer are again switched between the RF input and the complement of the RF input (i.e. essentially between +/−1) at the LO frequency. The switching action of FETs M1-M8 in the time domain provides the desired frequency translation in the frequency domain. Therefore, the described exemplary passive mixer converts the differential RF signal into a baseband signal or an intermediate frequency (IF) signal having a pair of components 180 degrees out of phase with each other.

In practice the complementary PMOS devices, M5–M8, reduce the average on resistance and associated loss of the NMOS devices, M1–-M4, for a sinusoidal LO drive signal. For example, FIG. 4 graphically illustrates the general dependence of the on resistance of an NMOS FET 120 and a PMOS FET 130 as a function of the absolute value of the gate-source voltage. The opposite polarity of the devices is such that the on resistance of a PMOS FET is relatively low when the on resistance of an NMOS FET is relatively high and vice versa. Therefore, the parallel combination 140 of the on resistance of a PMOS FET and NMOS FET, on average, is significantly lower and more linear over a cycle of a sinusoidal drive signal than the on resistance of the NMOS or PMOS devices alone.

However, the mobility of PMOS FETs tends to be significantly less than the mobility of a comparably sized NMOS device. Therefore, the aspect ratio of the PMOS devices M5–M8 of the described exemplary mixer are about 3–5 times larger than the aspect ratio of the corresponding NMOS devices M1–M4 to provide an optimum match between the on resistance of the PMOS and NMOS devices. The capacitance of the complementary PMOS devices therefore tends to be relatively high requiring a relatively high power LO drive signal for distortion free mixing. Therefore, referring to FIG. 5, an exemplary embodiment of the present invention further comprises a high swing, inductively loaded LO buffer 200 that provides high power drive signals 205 and 210 for optimum performance of the described exemplary passive mixer 100.

For example, FIG. 6 is a simplified schematic diagram of an exemplary LO buffer 200 for driving the described exemplary passive mixer. In this embodiment, a differential pair of inductively loaded NMOS FETs M11 and M12 are coupled between a positive voltage source VDD and ground. In operation, NMOS FETs M11 and M12 are driven by a complementary differential buffer drive signal such that when the drive signal for FET M11 is high the drive signal for FET M12 is low. In operation, if the buffer drive signal is high, NMOS transistor M11 is on and LO buffer output 220 is low. In addition, when the buffer drive signal is high the complement of the buffer drive signal is low and complementary LO buffer output 230 switches high (i.e. coupled to the positive voltage source VDD) through inductive load L2.

Similarly, if the buffer drive signal is low, NMOS transistor M11 is off, and the LO buffer output 220 switches high (i.e. coupled to the positive voltage source VDD) through the inductive load L1. In addition, in this instance the complement of the buffer drive signal is high switching on NMOS FET m12 thereby coupling the complementary LO buffer output 230 to ground (i.e. switching to low).

Advantageously, the use of inductive loads L1 and L2 tunes out the capacitance of the buffer and reduces the required power consumption of the buffers. However, in the described exemplary embodiment, the LO buffer is coupled between a positive voltage source and ground and does not include a tail end bias current coupled to the sources of the NMOS FETs M11 and M12. Therefore, in the described exemplary embodiment the driver for the LO buffer may include an LO buffer bias circuit to apply a predetermined bias voltage to the gates of NMOS FETS M11 and M12. In an exemplary embodiment the LO buffer bias circuit comprises AC coupling capacitors C1 and C2, drive resistors R1 and R2 and an LO buffer biasing source 250 adapted to provide the desired voltage at nodes N1 and N2.

For example referring to FIG. 7, the LO buffer biasing source 250 may comprise a MOS transistor M14 having a gate coupled to R1 and R2, the gate and source coupled to a current source I1 and the drain coupled to ground. In one embodiment the aspect ratio of NMOS FETs M11 and M12 may be substantially equal. In addition, in the described exemplary embodiment the aspect ratio of NMOS FETs M11 and M12 is K times larger than the aspect ratio of MOS transistor M14, where K is a constant greater than unity. The described exemplary biasing circuit therefore performs as a current mirror where the bias current that drives FETs M11 and M12 is approximately K times larger than the level of current source I1.

In the described exemplary Lo buffer the inductive loads L1 and L2 on the output side of the NMOS FETs M11 and M12 may be used to tune out the capacitance associated with the PMOS FETs M5–-M8 of the passive mixer (see FIG. 3). Therefore, the power consumption of the described exemplary buffer may also be reduced.

In the described exemplary embodiment, the differential LO waveforms output by the LO buffer 200 are, by way of example, sine waves delivered from a relatively low output impedance buffer. The described exemplary inductively loaded differential transistor pair M11 and M12 output a very high swing LO buffer signal 220 and complementary LO buffer output signal 230. In an exemplary embodiment the LO sine waves output by the LO buffer have nearly rail-rail excursions with the minimum sine wave amplitude limited only by the drain source voltage of NMOS transistors M11 and M12 (i.e. ground+VDS).

However, the maximum excursion of the differential LO sine waves output by the inductively loaded transistors may exceed VDD and may therefore breakdown the FET devices M1–M8 of the passive mixer (see FIG. 3). In addition, the common mode voltage of the LO buffer output signals, LO and the complement of LO 220 and 230, is approximately equal to VDD which is higher than the optimum drive level for the PMOS FETs M5–M8 of the passive mixer.

Therefore, referring to the simplified circuit diagram of FIG. 8, an exemplary LO buffer 200 may further comprise an LO buffer voltage limiter 225 coupled to the LO buffer outputs 220 and 230 to limit the common mode voltage of the buffer output signals. In an exemplary embodiment, the voltage limiter may comprise AC coupling capacitors C3 and C4 on the LO buffer 220 and complementary LO buffer 230 outputs along with biasing resistors R1 and R2 which are biased to a predetermined voltage, i.e. VCommon Mode.

In this embodiment, the LO buffer 220 and complementary LO buffer 230 outputs are sinusoidal signals with a common mode voltage that may be set to a desired level. For example, in one embodiment the common mode output of the LO buffers may be set at approximately VDD/2 to provide the optimum gate-source drive levels for both the NMOS M1–M4 and PMOS M5–M8 devices of the passive mixer 100 (see FIG. 3).

In operation, however nodes N3 and N4 of the LO buffer may still experience inductive load swings above VDD. These relatively high voltage levels may stress the gate to drain junction of NMOS FETs, M11 and M12, compromising the reliability of these devices. In addition, shunt capacitors C3 and C4 on the outputs of the LO buffer create a capacitive voltage divider with the capacitive FETs M1-M8 of the passive mixer. The capacitive voltage divider may significantly reduce the amplitude of the mixer drive signals for small ratios of the shunt capacitors C3 and C4 to the load capacitance of the FETs of the passive mixer.

Therefore, referring to FIG. 9, an exemplary LO buffer may include a load, such as for example, a limiting resistor R5, coupled between the positive voltage source VDD and the inductive loads L1 and L2 to limit the common mode voltage of the LO buffer output singals. In this embodiment, the resistor R5 creates a voltage drop across the resistor equal to the product of the current I3 flowing through R5 and the resistive value of R5 (i.e. an IR drop). Therefore, assuming that inductors L1 and L2 are ideal, the common mode voltage at nodes N3 and N4 is approximately equal to VDD−I3R5. Accordingly, the reliability of NMOS device M11 and M12 may be improved by adjusting the value of R5 as can the common mode drive level of FETs M1–M8 of the described exemplary passive mixer.

In addition, R5 will consume less on chip die space than shunt capacitors C3 and C4 (see FIG. 8) and eliminate the signal loss resulting from the capacitive voltage divider created by the shunt capacitors. One of skill in the art will appreciate that a capacitor may be coupled in parallel with resistor R5 between the positive voltage source and load

FIG. 10 illustrates the integration of the described exemplary passive mixer 100 into an exemplary communication system. The illustrated communications system 500 comprises a transmit node 502 for transmitting a radio frequency information signal 505 and a receive node 510 for receiving and processing the transmitted RF information signal.

Referring to FIG. 11, an exemplary receive node 510 includes, by way of example, a radio receiver 520, a communications control system or controller 530, and an antenna 540. In an exemplary embodiment the antenna may be incorporated directly into the receiver 520. In one embodiment the communications controller 530 is, by way of example, a media access controller (MAC) operating in accordance with one or more standards, including but not limited to, IEEE 802.11, Bluetooth, advanced mobile phone services (AMPS), global systems for mobile communications (GSM), code division multiple access (CDMA), local multi-point distribution systems (LMDS), multi-channel-multi-point distribution systems (MMDS), and or variations thereof. In an exemplary embodiment the communications controller 530 is coupled to the radio receiver and is, by way of example, an integrated digital controller with a plurality of inputs and outputs, such as a transmit data output and a receive data input.

In the illustrated receiver node 510, the receiver 520 is coupled to the antennae 540 and includes a low noise amplifier 550, one or more intermediate frequency stages 560 and a filtering stage 570. In an exemplary embodiment, at least one of the one or more intermediate frequency stages includes the described exemplary passive mixer.

In the illustrated embodiment, the low noise amplifier 550 receives an inbound RF signal from the antennae and outputs an amplified received signal to the described exemplary passive mixer. The passive mixer mixes the amplified received RF signal with one or more local oscillator signals to convert the amplified received RF signal into a baseband signal or an intermediate frequency (IF) signal.

The filtering stage 570 then filters the IF or baseband signal to attenuate unwanted out of band signals to produce a filtered IF signal. The communications controller recovers raw data from the filtered IF signal in accordance with the particular communications standard in use.

The invention described herein will itself suggest to those skilled in the various arts, alternative embodiments and solutions to other tasks and adaptations for other applications. It is the applicant's intention to cover by claims all such uses of the invention and those changes and modifications that could be made to the embodiments of the invention herein chosen for the purpose of disclosure without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

Behzad, Arya Reza

Patent Priority Assignee Title
8090340, Dec 12 2005 MEDIATEK INC. Down-converter and calibration method thereof
8981882, Dec 21 2010 STMicroelectronics SA; STMICROELECTRONICS S A Electronic switch and communication device including such a switch
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4947062, May 19 1988 AMP Incorporated; AMP INVESTMENTS, INC ; WHITAKER CORPORATION, THE Double balanced mixing
5361409, Mar 12 1991 WJ COMMUNICATIONS, INC FET mixer having transmission line transformer
5513390, Mar 12 1991 WJ COMMUNICATIONS, INC Biased FET mixer
6057714, May 29 1998 Skyworks Solutions, Inc Double balance differential active ring mixer with current shared active input balun
6133793, Jul 27 1998 Apple Inc Circuit and method of amplifying a signal for a receiver
6194947, Jul 24 1998 GCT SEMICONDUCTOR, INC VCO-mixer structure
6380777, Aug 20 1999 International Business Machinesc Corporation Output driver having controlled slew rate
6608527, Oct 21 1999 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITED Adaptive radio transceiver with low noise amplification
6781445, Apr 13 2001 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD Low power large signal RF tuned buffer amplifier
20040174202,
20040259519,
20050073352,
EP726646,
//////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 26 2004Broadcom Corporation(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 01 2016Broadcom CorporationBANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTPATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT0378060001 pdf
Jan 19 2017BANK OF AMERICA, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTBroadcom CorporationTERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS0417120001 pdf
Jan 20 2017Broadcom CorporationAVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0417060001 pdf
May 09 2018AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITEDMERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0471960097 pdf
Sep 05 2018AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITEDCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE EXECUTION DATE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 047196 FRAME: 0097 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER 0485550510 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 24 2009M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 14 2013M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 24 2017M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Jan 24 20094 years fee payment window open
Jul 24 20096 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 24 2010patent expiry (for year 4)
Jan 24 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Jan 24 20138 years fee payment window open
Jul 24 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 24 2014patent expiry (for year 8)
Jan 24 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Jan 24 201712 years fee payment window open
Jul 24 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Jan 24 2018patent expiry (for year 12)
Jan 24 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)