A non-volatile memory device includes a semiconductor substrate and an N-type source and drain within the substrate. An oxide-nitride-oxide (ONO) stack is formed over the substrate. The ONO stack includes a thin bottom oxide layer. A P+ polysilicon gate electrode is formed over the ONO stack. The memory device is operative to perform a channel erase operation in which a pair of charge storing cells within the nitride layer are erased simultaneously.

Patent
   6995423
Priority
Jan 14 2003
Filed
Jun 28 2004
Issued
Feb 07 2006
Expiry
Jan 14 2023
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
2
23
all paid
15. A memory device comprising:
a semiconductor substrate having a first conductive region and a second conductive region formed therein and a channel region interposed between the first and second conductive regions;
a first dielectric layer disposed over the semiconductor substrate;
a dielectric charge trapping layer disposed over the first dielectric layer;
a second dielectric layer disposed over the dielectric charge trapping layer; and
a gate electrode disposed over the second dielectric layer, wherein the gate electrode has a barrier height of about 4.1 eV to about 4.2 eV relative to the second dielectric layer.
1. A memory device comprising:
a semiconductor substrate:
an N-type conductivity source and an N-type conductivity drain formed on opposite sides within the semiconductor substrate, said source and drain defining a body region therebetween;
a bottom dielectric layer formed over the semiconductor substrate, said bottom dielectric layer having a thickness;
a charge storing layer formed over the bottom dielectric layer, said charge storing layer having a conductivity such that a first charge can be stored in a first charge storing cell adjacent the source and a second charge can be stored in a second charge storing cell adjacent the drain;
a top dielectric layer formed over the charge storing layer, said top dielectric having a thickness, wherein the thickness of the bottom dielectric layer is less than the thickness of the top dielectric layer; and
a P+ polysilicon gate electrode formed over the top dielectric layer.
2. The memory device according to claim 1, wherein the bottom dielectric layer has a thickness of about 40 Å to about 60Å.
3. The memory device according to claim 2, wherein the top dielectric layer has a thickness of about 100 Å to about 120 Å.
4. The memory device according to claim 2, wherein the charge storing layer has a thickness of about 40 Å to about 70 Å.
5. The memory device according to claim 1, wherein the P polysilicon gate electrode is effective to decrease the probability that, during an erase operation, electrons within the gate layer will overcome a potential barrier of the top dielectric layer and enter the charge storing layer.
6. The memory device according to claim 5, wherein the bottom dielectric layer is effective to (i) increase the probability that, during an erase operation, electrons within the charge storing layer will overcome a potential barrier of the bottom dielectric layer to exit the charge storing layer into the substrate, and (ii) decrease the probability that, during operations other than an erase operation, electrons will overcome a potential barrier of the bottom dielectric layer and escape from the charge storing layer.
7. The memory device according to claim 2, wherein the Ppolysilicon gate layer and the bottom dielectric layer are effective to increase the probability that electrons will be removed from the charge storing layer via a channel erase operation.
8. The memory device according to claim 1, wherein the gate electrode has a P+ dopant concentration of about 1×e19 atoms/cm3 to about 1×e21 atoms/cm3.
9. A method of performing an erase operation on the memory device according to claim 1, the method comprising:
applying a negative erase voltage to the gate electrode;
one of (i) connecting the drain to a zero potential, and (ii) floating the drain; and
one of (i) connecting the source to a zero potential and (ii) floating the source.
10. The method according to claim 9, wherein the simultaneous steps occur for a duration of at least about 100 ms.
11. The method according to claim 10, wherein the erase voltage applied to the gate electrode is in a range of about −10 volts to about −20 volts.
12. The method according to claim 10, wherein the erase voltage applied to the gate electrode is less than about −20 volts.
13. The method according to claim 10, wherein the duration is less than about 1 sec.
14. The method according to claim 10, wherein the charge storing layer includes two bits, both bits being erased simultaneously.
16. The memory device according to claim 15, wherein the gate electrode is comprised of P+polysilicon.
17. The memory device according to claim 15, wherein the second dielectric layer has a thickness that is less than a thickness of the first dielectric layer.
18. The memory device according to claim 17, wherein the second dielectric layer has a thickness of about 40 Å to about 60 Å.
19. The memory device according to claim 18, wherein the first dielectric layer has a thickness of about 100 Å to about 120 Å.

This application is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/341,881, filed Jan. 14, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,885,590 the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

The present invention relates generally to the field of non-volatile memory devices and, more particularly, to a semiconductor/oxide-nitride-oxide on semiconductor (SONOS) type electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) having a P+ gate and a thin bottom oxide layer and an improved channel erase method.

A pervasive trend in modern integrated circuit manufacture is to increase the number of bits stored per unit area on an integrated circuit memory core that contains memory devices (sometimes referred to as memory cells), such as flash electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) devices. For instance, a conventional semiconductor/oxide-nitride-oxide on semiconductor (SONOS) type memory device is capable of storing two bits of data in “double-bit” format. That is, one bit can be stored using a memory cell on a first side of the memory device and a second bit can be stored using a memory cell on a second side of the memory device.

An exemplary non-volatile SONOS-type memory device includes a semiconductor substrate with a source and a drain (both typically having N-type conductivity) formed therein. A body is formed between the source and the drain. An oxide-nitride-oxide (ONO) stack is formed above the body. A gate electrode, which typically comprises an N or N+ polysilicon layer, is formed over the ONO stack. The ONO stack includes a first or bottom dielectric layer (often referred to as a bottom tunnel oxide), a charge storing nitride layer, and a second or top dielectric layer.

Programming of such a SONOS device can be accomplished, for example, by hot electron injection. Hot electron injection involves applying appropriate voltage potentials to each of the gate, the source, and the drain of the SONOS memory device for a specified duration until the charge storing layer accumulates charge. Such a process, with respect to a NOR architecture SONOS device is disclosed in co-owned U.S. Pat. No. 6,215,702, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

A conventional SONOS-type memory device, (e.g., having n N-type gate electrode and bottom oxide having a thickness of about 70 Å-100 Å), can only be erased using the conventional technique of “hot hole injection” (sometimes referred to as band-to-band (BTB) hot hole injection). In hot hole injection, a gate voltage of approximately −4˜−8 volts is applied along with a drain voltage on the order of 4.5–6.0 volts, while the source is floated or grounded to erase one of the memory cells (typically the normal bit). Conversely, the complementary bit cell is erased by floating the drain and applying the appropriate voltage to the source and the gate. With such erase conditions, a BTB tunnel current is created under the gate. Holes are generated under these conditions and accelerate from the N-type drain region into the P-type body. The generated holes are accelerated in the electrical field created near the P-N drain/body junction. Some of the accelerated holes surmount the oxide to silicon interface between the substrate and the bottom oxide and are injected into the nitride layer to displace electrons (e.g., by recombination) and erase the cell. However, as these hot holes bombard the interface between the substrate and the bottom tunnel oxide, the interface as well as the bottom tunnel oxide are damaged causing undesirable interface states and degraded reliability over program/erase cycling.

Another erase mechanism is channel erase (also commonly referred to as a Fowler-Nordheim (FN) erase). Typically, in conventional SONOS-type devices, the top and bottom oxides have the same dielectric constant, resulting in the vertical fields during the erase being the same across both the top and bottom oxides. Therefore, during an FN channel erase, electrons are pushed out from the charge storing layer to the substrate. However, because of the required erase voltage, electrons also flow from the N+ gate through the top oxide into the charge storing layer at approximately the same tunneling rate. Therefore, while there is a net current from the control gate to the substrate, charge is not erased effectively from the charge storing layer.

An attempt has been made to use channel erase with a SONOS-type architecture memory device having a very thin bottom tunnel oxide layer, (i.e., 30 Å or less). While less bottom oxide damage may occur with this erase mechanism, SONOS devices having a very thin bottom tunnel oxide suffer from data retention issues due to this thin bottom oxide. Of course, one of the most important concerns with EEPROM cells is data retention capability. Data retention is defined as the length of time a particular cell can retain information stored in the form of charge on the charge storing layer. Devices with very thin bottom oxide layers are susceptible to “low voltage leakage current,” which arises when electrons within the charge storing layer traverse the bottom tunnel oxide when no voltage is applied to the device. This small amount of leakage current may ultimately lead to total discharge of the cell.

Accordingly, there is an ever increasing demand for a SONOS-type memory device, which can be erased effectively, while still maintaining data retention capability.

According to one aspect of the invention, the invention is directed to a memory device. The memory device includes a semiconductor substrate, an N-type conductivity source, and an N-type conductivity drain formed on opposite sides within the semiconductor substrate, such that the source drain defined a body region therebetween. A bottom dielectric layer is formed over the semiconductor substrate. A charge storing layer is formed over the bottom dielectric layer. The charge storing layer has a conductivity such that a first charge can be stored in a first charge storing cell adjacent the source and a second charge can be stored in a second charge storing cell adjacent the train. A top dielectric layer is formed over the charge storing layer and a P+ polysilicon gate layer is formed over the top dielectric layer.

According to another aspect of the invention, the invention is directed to a a memory device. The memory device includes a semiconductor substrate having a first conductive region and a second conductive region formed therein and a channel region interposed between the first and second conductive regions. A first dielectric layer is disposed over the semiconductor substrate and a dielectric charge trapping layer is disposed over the first dielectric layer. A second dielectric layer is disposed over the dielectric charge trapping layer and a gate electrode is disposed over the second dielectric layer, wherein the gate electrode has a barrier height of about 4.1 eV to about 4.2 eV relative to the second dielectric layer.

These and further features of the present invention will be apparent with reference to the following description and drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 is a schematic cross-section illustration of a SONOS-type memory device in accordance with the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a neutral state energy band diagram of a SONOS-type memory device having a P+ gate in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a programmed state energy band diagram of a SONOS-type memory device having a P+ gate in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is an over-erased state energy band diagram of a SONOS-type memory device having a P+ gate in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a neutral state energy band diagram of a SONOS-type memory device having a P+ gate and a reduced thickness bottom oxide in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 6 is a programmed state energy band diagram of a SONOS-type memory device having a P+ gate and a reduced thickness bottom oxide in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a plot of drain current vs. gate voltage for a plurality of channel erase operations performed on a SONOS-type memory device in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 8 is a plot of threshold voltage vs. erase time for both a normal bit and a complementary bit on a SONOS-type memory device in accordance with the present invention.

In the detailed description that follows, corresponding components have been given the same reference numerals regardless of whether they are shown in different embodiments of the present invention. To illustrate the present invention in a clear and concise manner, the drawings may not necessarily be to scale and certain features may be shown in somewhat schematic form.

With reference to FIG. 1, an embodiment of a “double-bit”, semiconductor/oxide-nitride-oxide on semiconductor (SONOS) type, non-volatile, flash electrically erasable programmable read only memory (EEPROM) memory device 10 is illustrated. The memory device 10 includes a semiconductor substrate 12. In one embodiment, the substrate 12 can initially be doped to have P-type conductivity (e.g., P dopant concentration). Within the substrate 12, an N-type conductivity (e.g., N+ dopant concentration) source 14 and an N-type conductivity (e.g., N+ dopant concentration) drain 16 are formed.

A body 18 is formed between the source 14 and the drain 16. The body 18 can have the dopant type and concentration as the initial doping of the substrate 12. The substrate 12, the source 14, the drain 16 and the body 18 can be formed, for example, from a semiconductor such as appropriately doped silicon, germanium or silicon-germanium.

Above the body 18 is a dielectric layer (also referred to as a tunneling oxide layer or bottom dielectric layer 26) that is made from, for example, silicon oxide (SiO2), other standard-K material (e.g., having a relative permittivity below ten) or a high-K material (e.g., having a relative permittivity, in one embodiment above ten, and in one embodiment above twenty).

Over the bottom dielectric layer 26 is a charge trapping layer (also referred to as a charge storing layer 28). The charge storing layer 28 can be made from, for example, a non-conductive material including silicon nitride (Si3N4), silicon oxide with varied polysilicon islands, implanted oxide and the like.

Over the charge storing layer 28 is another dielectric layer (also referred to as a top dielectric layer 30) made from a material such as, for example, silicon oxide, other standard-K material or a high-K material. Over the top dielectric layer 30 is a gate electrode 32 made from, for example, polycrystalline silicon. Preferably, the gate electrode 32 has a P+ dopant concentration, the advantages of which will be discussed more fully below.

The gate electrode 32, the top dielectric layer 30, the charge storing layer 28 and the bottom dielectric layer 26 form a gate stack 34. Sidewall spacers 35 can be disposed adjacent lateral sidewalls of the gate stack 34 for use in controlling dopant implantation. A work function of the gate stack 34 controls a channel 37 within the body 18. As is understood in the art, the channel 37 extends from the source 14 to the drain 16.

In one embodiment, the bottom dielectric layer 26 has a thickness that is less than the thickness of the top dielectric layer 30. For example, the bottom dielectric layer 26 can have a thickness of about 40 Å to about 60 Å, while the top dielectric layer can have a thickness between about 100Å–120Å. As is described more fully below, the thickness of the bottom dielectric layer facilitates effective FN or channel erasing, while remaining thick enough to prevent low voltage leakage current and facilitate desirable data retention. In one embodiment, the charge storing layer 28 has a thickness of about 50 Å to about 70 Å. As is discussed more fully below, the thickness of the bottom dielectric layer 26, coupled with the P+ gate electrode 32 results in significant advantages with respect to erasing of the charge storing cells.

The memory device 10 is operatively arranged to be programmed, read and erased by the application of appropriate voltage potentials to each of the gate electrode 32, the source 14 and the drain 16. More specifically, the gate electrode 32 can be coupled to a word line (WL), the source 14 can be coupled to a first bit line (BL1) and the drain 16 can be coupled to a second bit line (BL2) for applying the various voltage potentials to the corresponding components of the memory device 10.

In one embodiment, the memory device 10 can be configured as a virtual ground device. That is, the memory device 10 is connected in series with adjacent memory devices (not shown) such that the source 14 can be formed from a conductive region that also forms a drain of the adjacent memory device. Similarly, the drain 16 can be formed from a conductive region that also forms the source of a memory device (not shown) disposed adjacent the drain 16 side of the memory device 10. It is noted that the source and drain of adjacent memory devices need not be formed from a single conductive region, but can be formed from separate structures that are electrically connected together (e.g., a pair of conductive regions spaced apart by a trench isolation region and connected by a conductive layer, such as silicide).

As will become more apparent from the discussion below, within the charge storing layer 28, the memory device 10 includes a first charge storing region or cell (also referred to herein as a first cell or normal bit 36) adjacent the drain 16 and a second charge storing region or cell (also referred to herein as a second cell or complementary bit 38) adjacent the source 14.

In the illustrated embodiment, the memory device 10 is a symmetrical device allowing for programming, reading and erasing of the first cell 36 and the second cell 38 by respectively switching the roles of the source 14 and drain 16 during those operations. Accordingly, the terms source and drain can be used interchangeably depending upon which of the normal bit 36 or complementary bit 38 is being programmed, verified, read or erased.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, programming of the charge storing cells 36 and 38 from a blank state (e.g., representing a binary value of “1”) to a charged state (e.g., representing a binary value of “0”) can be carried out using conventional techniques. It is noted that the blank state corresponds to an amount of charge being stored by the charge storing cell 36, 38 that, during a read operation, would place a threshold voltage (Vt) of the memory cell 10 equal to or less than an erase threshold voltage. The programmed state corresponds to an amount of charge being stored by the charge storing cell 36, 38 that, during the read operation, would place the threshold voltage of the memory cell 10 within a threshold voltage distribution that is higher than the erase threshold voltage. In one embodiment, the memory cell 10 can be programmed using multi-level cell (MLC) programming. MLC programming can be accomplished by programming-each charge storage cell 36, 38 with an amount of charge selected from one of a plurality of distinguishable amounts of charge, referred to as program levels.

In one embodiment, the programming technique involves hot electron injection. However, other programming techniques, such as hot hole injection, carrier tunneling and so forth are meant to fall within the scope of the present invention.

Using the hot electron injection technique to program the first charge storing cell 36, appropriate voltage potentials are applied to the source 14, drain 16 and/or the gate electrode 32. The applied potentials generate a vertical electric field through the dielectric layers 26, 30 and the charge storing layer 28 and a lateral electric field along the length of the channel 18 from the source 14 to the drain 16.

The lateral electric field causes electrons to be drawn off the source 14 and begin accelerating toward the drain 16. As the electrons move along the length of the channel 37, the electrons gain energy and upon attaining enough energy, the electrons are able to jump over the potential barrier of the bottom dielectric layer 26 and into the charge storing layer 28 where the electrons become trapped.

The probability of electrons jumping the potential barrier is a maximum in the area of the first charge storing cell 36 adjacent the drain 16, where the electrons have gained the most energy. These accelerated electrons are termed hot electrons and once injected into the charge storing layer 28, stay in the first charge storing cell 36 of the charge storing layer 28. The trapped electrons tend not to spread through the charge storing layer 28 due to this layer's low conductivity and low lateral electric field therein. Thus, the trapped charge remains in the localized trapping region the first charge storing cell 36 close to the drain 16.

The foregoing technique to program the first charge storing cell 36 can be used to program the second charge storing cell 38, but the functions of the source 14 and the drain 16 are reversed. More specifically, appropriate voltages are applied to the source 14, the drain 16 and/or the gate electrode 32 such that the drain 16 functions as a source of electrons that travel along the channel 37 from the drain 16 towards the source 14. Accordingly, the terms source and drain can be used interchangeably. As the electrons move along the length of the channel 37, the electrons gain energy and upon attaining enough energy, the electrons are able to jump over the potential barrier of the bottom dielectric layer 26 and into the charge storing layer 28 where the electrons become trapped. The probability of the hot electrons jumping the potential barrier is a maximum in the area of the first charge storing cell 36 adjacent the source 14, where the electrons have gained the most energy.

Table 1 includes exemplary voltage potentials and pulse durations that can be applied to the gate electrode 32, the source 14 and the drain 16 to program the charge storage regions 36, 38. It is noted that the values presented in table 1 will vary depending on the specific characteristics of the memory device 10 being programmed.

TABLE 1
Gate Source Drain Pulse
Voltage Voltage Voltage Length
First Cell 9–10 volts  0 volts 4–6 volts 1 μs
Second Cell 9–10 volts 4–6 volts  0 volts 1 μs

Verifying the programming of the memory device 10 and reading of the memory device 10 can be carried out using conventional techniques. For example, the charge storing cells 36, 38 can be read in a reverse direction with respect to the direction of programming.

In the illustrated embodiment, erasing of the charge storing cells 36, 38 can be accomplished using a channel erase operation utilizing Fowler-Nordheim (FN) tunneling. As is described more fully below, this channel erase operation is possible because of the structural features of the memory device 10. For example, the use of a heavily doped P+ gate electrode 32 sufficiently eliminates back tunneling from the gate electrode 32, across the top dielectric layer 30, into the charge storing layer 28. In addition, use of a reduced thickness bottom dielectric layer 26 facilitates weak direct tunneling across the bottom dielectric layer 26, while still preserving data retention capability.

In one embodiment, both charge storing cells are erased simultaneously by applying a negative gate erase voltage to the gate electrode 32 and grounding the source 14, drain 16, and substrate 18. In one embodiment, a relatively large negative gate erase voltage (e.g., about −20 volts) is applied to the gate electrode 32. Alternatively, smaller negative gate erase voltages (e.g., between about −4 volts to about −10 volts) may be applied. In another embodiment, the gate voltage is about −15 volts to about −20 volts, while the source and drain are floated or grounded and the substrate is grounded. Alternatively, in an embodiment in which the memory device sits in an isolated P-well within the substrate, a negative gate erase voltage of about −5 volts to about −10 volts is applied in conjunction with a positive P-well voltage of about +5 volts to about +10 volts with the source and drain left to float.

FIGS. 2–4 represent energy band diagrams of neutral, programmed, and over-erased states, respectively, for a memory device having a P+ gate electrode and a “thicker” (e.g., about 70 Å) bottom dielectric layer in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Regions 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 represent the substrate, bottom dielectric layer, charge storing layer, top dielectric layer, and gate electrode layer, respectively. The use of a P+ gate electrode provides an increased barrier height (shown by triangular barrier 100), which prevents charge, in the form of electrons, from overcoming the barrier potential of the top dielectric layer 80 and tunneling into the charge storing layer during erase operations. It is to be appreciated that “barrier height,” as used herein, refers to the size of the energy bandgap between the valence band and conduction band for a given material. This increased barrier height sufficiently minimizes, if not effectively prevents or otherwise “shuts off,” back tunneling of electrons from the gate electrode, through the top dielectric layer, into the charge storing layer during a channel or FN erase operation.

In particular, with reference to FIG. 2, the energy level of the conduction band (Ec) 110 is approximately 1.1 eV (electron-volts) greater than the energy level of the valence band (Ev) 120 within the polysilicon gate electrode region 90. A conventional gate electrode having an N+ dopant concentration is characterized by a fermi level, which is very close to the conduction band 110. For a memory device having an N+ gate electrode, the size of the triangular barrier 100 is approximately 3.1 eV. In contrast, the gate electrode of the present invention has a P+ dopant concentration, which is characterized by a fermi level just above the valence band 120. Therefore, for a memory device having a P+ gate electrode, the size of the triangular barrier 100 is approximately 4.2 eV. While the approximately 1.1 eV difference in the height of the triangular barrier 100 for a P+ gate electrode is significant, the effect on back tunneling current from the gate electrode to the charge storing layer is exceptional in light of the fact that the tunneling rate decreases exponentially with increasing barrier height. The increased barrier height, in turn, allows for a relatively large negative gate voltage of approximately −20 volts to be applied across the ONO stack to facilitate an FN channel erase operation in which both the normal bit and the complementary bit are effectively erased without encountering any back tunneling through the top dielectric layer.

FIGS. 5 and 6 represent energy band diagrams of neutral and programmed states, respectively, for a memory device having a P+ gate electrode and a thinner bottom dielectric layer (e.g., between about 40Å–60Å) in accordance with another embodiment of the invention. Again, regions 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90 represent the substrate, reduced thickness bottom dielectric layer, charge storing layer, top dielectric layer, and gate electrode layer, respectively. As discussed above, the P+ gate electrode provides an increased barrier height (shown by triangular barrier 100), which effectively prevents back tunneling of electrons from the gate electrode, through the top dielectric layer, into the charge storing layer during a channel erase operation. In addition, the reduced thickness bottom layer is effective to increase the probability that during an erase operation, electrons within the charge storing layer will overcome a potential barrier of the bottom dielectric to exit the charge storing layer. In other words, the reduced thickness bottom dielectric layer provides a reduced barrier width, which, in turn, facilitates direct tunneling (represented by arrow 140) from the charge storing layer during a channel erase operation. Therefore, it is to be appreciated that the channel erase mechanism is a combination of FN tunneling (represented by arrow 150) and weak direct tunneling. In addition, the channel erase operation is effective to remove charge from the entire channel without the need for a tailored erase operation.

FIG. 7 is a plot of the logarithm of drain current, Id(A), vs. gate voltage, Vg(V), on an exemplary device having a P+ gate electrode for a plurality of program and erase operations, such as single-bit programming (SBp), double-bit programming (DBp), and FN erasing (FNe1, FNe2). Artisans will appreciate that the normal bit is represented by (NB), while the complementary bit is represented by (CB). In this embodiment, a gate program voltage of approximately 9.5 volts is used together with a voltage of approximately 5 volts applied to the drain. In addition, a negative gate erase voltage of approximately −20 volts is used, while the source, drain, and substrate are held at 0 volts.

FIG. 8 is a plot of threshold voltage (Vt) vs. erase time (on log scale) for both the normal bit (NB) and complementary bit (CB) when a negative gate erase voltage is used. In this embodiment, the gate voltage Vg is approximately −20 volts, while the source, drain, and substrate are held at 0 volts. As shown in FIG. 8, it is possible to erase both bits with an erase pulse of approximately 100 ms (milliseconds), resulting in both cells being erased in approximately 1 second.

It is to be appreciated that the memory device of the present invention is efficient in erase operation and reliable in data retention up to at least 10,000 (10K) program-erase cycles.

With continued reference to FIG. 1, one method of fabricating the memory device 10 will be described in greater detail. As indicated, a semiconductor substrate 12 is provided. The semiconductor substrate 12 can be initially doped with P-type dopant, such as boron, gallium or indium. As indicated above, the initial substrate 12 doping can provide the desired conductivity for the body 18. Alternatively, an isolated P-well can be formed on the substrate, which allows for electrical bias to be applied to the isolated P-well during erase operation. In this embodiment, the memory device formed in the subsequent steps sits inside the isolated P-well.

A layer of material used to form the bottom dielectric layer 26 can be grown or deposited on top of the substrate 12. Preferably, the bottom dielectric layer will have a final thickness of about 40 Å to about 60 Å. As described above, the thickness of the bottom dielectric layer facilitates effective FN or channel erasing, while remaining thick enough to prevent low voltage leakage current during operations other than erasing, (e.g., programming, verifying, and reading), thereby maintaining desirable data retention. It is noted that the bottom dielectric layer can optionally be used as an implant screen during the implantation of dopant species into the substrate 12. In this instance, the bottom dielectric layer can be formed before initial substrate 12 implantation and/or source 14/drain 16 formation.

As indicated above, the bottom dielectric layer can be formed from an appropriate dielectric, such as silicon oxide. Following formation of the bottom dielectric layer, a layer of material used to form the charge storing layer 28 can be formed on the bottom dielectric layer 40. In one embodiment, the charge storing layer can be formed from silicon nitride. Other suitable dielectric materials may also be used for the charge storing layer 28. Preferably, the charge storing layer 28 has a final thickness of about 40Å–70Å.

On top of the charge storing layer 28, a top dielectric layer 30 can be formed. Similar to the bottom dielectric layer 26, the top dielectric layer 30 can be made from an appropriate dielectric, such as silicon oxide or a high-K material. High-K materials are materials having, in one embodiment, a relative permittivity of ten (10) or higher and, in another embodiment, of twenty (20) or higher. Suitable high-K materials include aluminum oxide (e.g., Al2O3), hafnium oxide (e.g., HfO2), zirconium oxide (e.g., ZrO2), and their respective silicates. However, the top dielectric layer 30 is thicker (i.e., about 100Å–110Å) than the bottom dielectric layer 26.

On top of the top dielectric layer 30, a gate electrode layer 32 can be formed. The gate electrode layer 32 can be made from, for example, polycrystalline silicon (“poly”) or another appropriate material such as a metal or metal oxide. The gate electrode layer 32 is doped with P-type dopant, such as boron, gallium or indium.

Preferably, the gate electrode layer 32 has a “P+” concentration. For example, the concentration can be about 1×e19 atoms/cm3 to about 2×e21 atoms/cm3. In one embodiment, boron ion species can be implanted with an energy of about 12 keV to about 40 keV and a dose of about 2×e15 atoms/cm2 to about 4×e15 atoms/cm2. As one skilled in the art will appreciate, the energy and dose can be adjusted for the specific memory device 10 being formed and taking into account the desired effects on programming and/or erasing of the memory device 10.

The sidewall spacers 35 and the deep doped regions, if applicable, of the source 14 and the drain 16 can be formed. The sidewall spacers 35 can be formed adjacent the lateral sidewalls of the gate stack using conventional techniques. For example, a layer of desired spacer material (e.g., silicon oxide, silicon nitride, silicon oxynitride, etc.) can be deposited to at least the height of the gate stack 34. If desired, the spacer material can be polished (using, for example, chemical mechanical planarization, or CMP) back to an upper surface of the gate electrode 32. Then, the spacer material can be anisotropically etched so that the sidewall spacers 35 remain.

Thereafter, any additional processing to complete formation of the memory device 10 can be carried out. For example, the source 14, the drain 16 and the gate electrode 32 can be reacted with a layer of metal (e.g., cobalt, nickel, molybdenum or titanium) to form silicide contacts (not shown). In addition, various interdielectric layers (not shown) can be formed over the memory device 10. With additional reference back to FIG. 1, the bit lines (e.g., BL1 and BL2) and the word line (e.g., WL) can be formed between interdielectric layers. The bit lines BL1 and BL2 can be respectively coupled to the source 14 and the drain 16 contacts with filled contact holes (e.g., vias) (not shown). Similarly, the word line WL can be coupled to the gate electrode 32 with a filled contact hole (e.g., a via) (not shown).

Although particular embodiments of the invention have been described in detail, it is understood that the invention is not limited correspondingly in scope, but includes all changes, modifications and equivalents coming within the spirit and terms of the claims appended hereto.

For example, the source 14 and drain 16 could be formed by techniques other than implanting dopant species. For instance, these regions can be in-situ doped during an epitaxial growth process.

Chang, Chi, Zheng, Wei, Kamal, Tazrien

Patent Priority Assignee Title
7348618, Mar 30 2005 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Flash memory cell having reduced floating gate to floating gate coupling
7465625, Mar 30 2005 U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Flash memory cell having reduced floating gate to floating gate coupling
Patent Priority Assignee Title
5311049, Oct 17 1991 Rohm Co., Ltd. Non-volatile semiconductor memory with outer drain diffusion layer
5612547, Oct 18 1993 Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation Silicon carbide static induction transistor
5768192, Jul 23 1996 MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING Non-volatile semiconductor memory cell utilizing asymmetrical charge trapping
5774400, Dec 23 1996 MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC Structure and method to prevent over erasure of nonvolatile memory transistors
5888867, Feb 13 1998 MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC Non-uniform threshold voltage adjustment in flash eproms through gate work function alteration
5898197, Jun 06 1996 DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT Non-volatile semiconductor memory devices
6011725, Aug 01 1997 MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING Two bit non-volatile electrically erasable and programmable semiconductor memory cell utilizing asymmetrical charge trapping
6122201, Oct 20 1999 Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Clipped sine wave channel erase method to reduce oxide trapping charge generation rate of flash EEPROM
6137718, Aug 01 1996 Infineon Technologies AG Method for operating a non-volatile memory cell arrangement
6215702, Feb 16 2000 MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC Method of maintaining constant erasing speeds for non-volatile memory cells
6265268, Oct 25 1999 MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC High temperature oxide deposition process for fabricating an ONO floating-gate electrode in a two bit EEPROM device
6348420, Dec 23 1999 ASM America, Inc Situ dielectric stacks
6456533, Feb 28 2001 MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC Higher program VT and faster programming rates based on improved erase methods
6583007, Dec 20 2001 MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING Reducing secondary injection effects
6671209, Sep 28 2001 Macronix International Co., Ltd. Erasing method for p-channel NROM
6720614, Aug 07 2001 Macronix International Co., Ltd. Operation method for programming and erasing a data in a P-channel sonos memory cell
6724661, Jun 21 2001 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Erasing method in non-volatile memory device
6754105, May 06 2003 MONTEREY RESEARCH, LLC Trench side wall charge trapping dielectric flash memory device
6903407, Oct 14 2003 LONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY SOLUTIONS LTD Non volatile charge trapping dielectric memory cell structure with gate hole injection erase
20010044187,
20020141237,
20030062567,
20030080370,
//////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 25 2002CHANG, CHIAdvanced Micro Devices, INCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0152680571 pdf
Nov 15 2002ZHENG, WEIAdvanced Micro Devices, INCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0152680571 pdf
Nov 25 2002KAMAL, TAZRIENAdvanced Micro Devices, INCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0152680571 pdf
Jun 28 2004Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Jan 31 2007SPANSION INC Spansion LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190690354 pdf
Jan 31 2007Advanced Micro Devices, INCSPANSION INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190470683 pdf
May 10 2010SPANSION TECHNOLOGY INC BARCLAYS BANK PLCSECURITY AGREEMENT0245220338 pdf
May 10 2010Spansion LLCBARCLAYS BANK PLCSECURITY AGREEMENT0245220338 pdf
Mar 12 2015Spansion LLCMORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0352400429 pdf
Mar 12 2015Cypress Semiconductor CorporationMORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 8647899 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 035240 FRAME 0429 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTERST 0580020470 pdf
Mar 12 2015BARCLAYS BANK PLCSPANSION TECHNOLOGY LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0352010159 pdf
Mar 12 2015BARCLAYS BANK PLCSpansion LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0352010159 pdf
Mar 12 2015Cypress Semiconductor CorporationMORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0352400429 pdf
Mar 12 2015Spansion LLCMORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 8647899 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 035240 FRAME 0429 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTERST 0580020470 pdf
Jun 01 2015Spansion, LLCCypress Semiconductor CorporationASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0360370716 pdf
May 03 2019Cypress Semiconductor CorporationLONGITUDE FLASH MEMORY SOLUTIONS LTDASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0490860803 pdf
May 03 2019MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC Cypress Semiconductor CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0491090573 pdf
May 03 2019MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC Spansion LLCRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0491090573 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Oct 21 2005ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Jun 22 2009M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Mar 18 2013M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 31 2017M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 07 20094 years fee payment window open
Aug 07 20096 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 07 2010patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 07 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 07 20138 years fee payment window open
Aug 07 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 07 2014patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 07 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 07 201712 years fee payment window open
Aug 07 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 07 2018patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 07 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)