power tool 1 may include table 5 on which work W is positioned. A portion of a circular blade 3 protrudes above table 5. Circular blade 3 may be driven by a motor. The motor may be controlled by a control device 90. work W is cut by means of an operator sending work W positioned on an upper face of table 5 in the direction of the circular blade 3 while circular blade 3 is being driven by the motor. power tool 1 may include first radar device 86 and second radar device 87 for monitoring a predetermined area in the vicinity of circular blade 3. First radar device 86 may detect whether objects other than work are present in the vicinity of a outer edge of circular blade 3. Second radar device 87 may detect the location of objects moving within the predetermined area in the vicinity of circular blade and detects the speed at which the objects are moving in the direction in which work is sent. Control device 90 may cause an emergency halt of the motor in the case where first radar device 86 detects that an object other than work is present in the vicinity of the outer edge of circular blade 3. Further, Control device 90 may cause an emergency halt of the motor in the case where an object detected by second radar device 87 has a predetermined positional relationship relative to circular blade 3 and the detected speed exceeds a predetermined value.
|
1. A power tool, comprising:
a cutting tool;
a motor that drives the cutting tool;
a radar that transmits radio waves towards a predetermined area in the vicinity of a contacting location, the predetermined location being a location where a blade edge of the cutting tool and a work piece make contact, the radar also receiving radio waves reflected therefrom; and
a processor in communication with the radar, wherein the processor determines whether an object other than work is in the predetermined area based upon the reflected waves received by the radar.
2. A power tool as in
3. A power tool as in
4. A power tool as in
5. A power tool as in
6. A power tool as in
7. A power tool as in
|
This application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/706,514, filed Nov. 12, 2003 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,959,631 and Japanese patent application number 2002-328837, filed Nov. 12, 2002, and Japanese patent application number 2003-81399, filed Mar. 24, 2003, each of which are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to power tools, e.g., table saws, miter saws and the like. Specifically, techniques are described for preventing a cutting tool from making contact with objects other than work.
2. Description of the Related Art
U.S. unexamined patent application no. 17336/2002 describes a power tool that carries out an emergency stop when a cutting tool has made contact with a person (i.e., an object other than work). The known power tool includes a contact detection system that detects contact between a person and a cutting tool. The contact detection system is electrically coupled to the cutting tool and monitors an electrical potential of the cutting tool in order to detect contact between a person and the cutting tool. If contact between the person and the cutting tool is detected by the contact detection system, power supply to the motor is stopped, effecting an emergency stop of the cutting tool.
However, in the known power tool, movement of the cutting tool is halted only after contact between a person and the cutting tool has been detected, and it is not possible to prevent contact between the person and the moving cutting tool.
It is, accordingly, one object of the present teachings to provide improved power tools that can prevent a cutting tool from making contact with objects other than work (e.g., persons, etc).
In one aspect of the present teachings, power tools are taught that are capable of detecting abnormal conditions before contact between the cutting tool and objects other than work occurs. Therefore, if the abnormal conditions are detected, the power tools can warn operators and/or stop movement of the cutting tool.
Thus, in one embodiment of the present teachings, power tools may include a cutting tool, such as a circular blade or saw blade, and a drive source, such as an electric motor, for driving the cutting tool. Such power tools may also include a detecting device (e.g., a detecting device using radio waves, a detecting device using ultrasonic waves, a detecting device using infrared rays, etc.) and a control device, such as a microprocessor or processor, in communication with the detecting device. For example, the detecting device may detect the location and speed of objects (e.g., work, etc.) moving within a predetermined area near the cutting tool. On the basis of the location and speed of the objects detected by the detecting device the control device may determine whether operating conditions are normal or abnormal. For example, the control device may determine whether the cutting tool and the objects detected by the detecting device have a predetermined positional relationship (e.g., whether the distance between the cutting tool and the object is within a predetermined value), and also determine whether the speed of the objects detected by the detecting device towards the cutting tool exceeds a predetermined value. From the results of these determinations it may be decided whether operating conditions are normal or abnormal. For example, when a detected object is moving at normal speed near the cutting tool and in a direction approaching the cutting tool, it may be determined that this is simply work being delivered for cutting at a normal speed and that operating condition is normal. However, when the detected object is moving at rapid speed near the cutting tool and in a direction approaching the cutting tool, it may be determined that operating conditions is abnormal. Since it can be determined whether operating conditions are normal or abnormal before contact between the object and the cutting tool occurs, contact between the object and the cutting tool can be prevented under abnormal operating conditions.
When operating conditions have been determined to be abnormal, a warning may be given to the power tool operator, and/or the movement of the cutting tool may be automatically stopped. For example, the power tools may also include a buzzer that generates a warning sound. Further, the power tool may also include a switch for cutting off power supply to the motor. As another example, the power tool may also include a brake mechanism that engages and stop the cutting tool, or retracting mechanism that retract the cutting tool from its operating position. Further, the power tool may also include a barrier that is placed between the cutting tool and the operator when operating conditions have been determined to be abnormal.
Preferably, the detecting device may include a radar device that transmits radio waves towards the predetermined area and receives the radio waves reflected therefrom. By using the radio waves, the location and speed of the object can be detected accurately even if chips are formed during the cutting operation.
Further, it is preferred that the frequency of the radio waves transmitted from the radar device is 1 GHz or above, and it is more preferred that the frequency is in the range of 10–30 GHz. By using radio waves of this frequency, directivity can be improved, and it is possible to monitor only the surroundings of the cutting tool.
In another embodiment of the present teachings, the power tools may further include a table on an upper face of which the work is positioned. A portion of the cutting tool may protrude above the table, this protruding portion cutting the work. In this case, the area to be monitored by the radar device may be restricted to above the table. For example, it is possible to monitor only an area that rises to a predetermined height above the table and is within a predetermined range of distance from side faces of the cutting tool. Further, it is preferred that the radar device is disposed in positions so as to sandwich the table and face towards a power tool operator. This type of configuration prevents the radar device from obstructing the operations of the power tool operator.
In another aspect of the present teachings, power tools may include a cutting tool and a motor for driving the cutting tool. The power tool may further include a radar device and a processor in communication with the radar device. The radar device preferably transmits radio waves towards a predetermined area in the vicinity of a contacting location where an edge of the cutting tool and work make contact, and receives radio waves reflected therefrom. The processor preferably determines from the reflected radio waves received by the radar device whether an object other than work is in the predetermined area. For example, using the difference between the waves reflected when work is in the predetermined area and the waves reflected when an object other than work is in the predetermined area, the processor can determine whether work or an object other than work is in the predetermined area. When it has been determined that an object other than work is in the predetermined area, a warning may be given to the power tool operator, and/or the movement of the cutting tool may be immediately stopped. By this means, contact between the cutting tool and an object other than work can be prevented.
Preferably, the power tools may also include a memory for storing the reflected radio waves created when the work is disposed within the predetermined area. The reflected waves can be stored as time series data in the memory. Alternatively, only identification information extracted from the reflected waves (e.g., peak values of the reflected waves, waveform patterns, etc.) may be stored. Further, the processor may determine whether an object other than work is in the predetermined area by using the reflected waves received by the radar device and the reflected waves stored in the memory. For example, the processor preferably determines that an object other than work is in the predetermined area when the absolute value of the difference between the peak values of the reflected waves received by the radar device and peak values of the reflected waves stored in the memory exceeds a predetermined threshold value. Since the reflected waves created when the work is disposed in the predetermined area are already stored, this configuration allows an accurate determination of whether an object other than work is in the predetermined area.
Generally, the radio wave reflection coefficient of materials varies according to frequency. As a result the radio waves may be transmitted from the radar device as impulses (i.e., including many frequency elements), and the processor may perform frequency analysis on the reflected waveforms to determine whether an object other than work is present within the predetermined area.
In the alternative, in the case where the work is wood, the radio wave reflection coefficient characteristics of wood can be taken into account and only radio waves within a narrow frequency range can be transmitted (e.g., single frequency radio waves) to allow the determination of whether an object other than work is present within the predetermined area. For example, the frequency of the radio waves transmitted from the radar device may be established between the range of 1–30 GHz. Radio waves with a frequency of 1–30 GHz have a low reflection coefficient for wooden material that has a low moisture content, and have a high reflection coefficient for objects with a high moisture content (e.g., hands, fingers, etc.). Consequently, it is possible to identify whether the object from which the radio waves are reflected is work or an object other than work (i.e., an object with a high moisture content) even though radio waves within a narrow frequency range are transmitted. That is, when the peak values of the reflected waves received by the radar device exceed a predetermined threshold, it can be determined that an object other than work is present in the predetermined area. Further, even in the case where the frequency of the radio waves is within the range of 1˜30 GHz, the frequency may be changed in accordance with one's aims. For example, it is preferred that a lower radio-wave frequency is chosen for penetrating bulky wood, and that a higher radio-wave frequency is chosen for improving the directivity of the radio waves.
In another embodiment of the present teachings, the power tools may further include a table on an upper face of which the work is positioned. A portion of the cutting tool may protrude above the table, this protruding portion cutting the work. In this case, it is preferred that the radar device may be disposed beneath the table and that the table may have a penetrable window which can allow the radio waves transmitted from the radar to penetrate therethrough. The penetrable window can be manufactured from a material (e.g., resin) through which radio waves penetrate easily. Locating the radar device beneath the table prevents the radar device from obstructing the operator.
In another embodiment of the present teachings, the power tools may include a table on an upper face of which work is positioned, and an arm slidably or pivotably attached to the table. A cutting area for cutting the work may be provided on the table. The cutting tool may be rotatably attached to the arm. By moving the arm relative to the table, the cutting tool can be moved between an operating position close to the cutting area and a waiting position removed therefrom. In this case, it is preferred that the radar device transmits the radio waves towards the cutting area and receives the radio waves reflected therefrom.
In another aspect of the present teachings, the radar device may include a radio wave transmitting member and a radio wave receiving member. Preferably, at least one of the radio wave transmitting member and the radio wave receiving member may have a plurality of microstrip antennas. By using the microstrip antennas, the radio wave transmitting member or the radio wave receiving member can be miniaturized and can save space. Further, by using a plurality of microstrip antennas or patch antennas (i.e., a type of microstrip antenna), the desired directivity can be obtained. Further, the radio wave transmitting member and the radio wave receiving member may have different antennas. Alternatively, the radio wave transmitting member and the radio wave receiving member may have the same antenna.
Preferably, the microstrip antenna may include a strip conductor, a ground conductor disposed in a position opposite the strip conductor, and a dielectric layer disposed between the strip conductor and the ground conductor. In this case, a groove may be formed in a surface of the dielectric layer and that the strip conductor may be disposed within the groove. Since the strip conductor does not protrude from the surface of the dielectric layer, damage to the strip conductor can be prevented. Further, a groove may be formed in the ground conductor and that the dielectric layer may disposed within the groove formed in the ground conductor. By this means, the dielectric layer does not protrude from the ground conductor, and consequently damage to the dielectric layer can be prevented. Preferably, the microstrip antenna may be disposed within a surface of a housing of the power tools (e.g., a table, etc.).
These aspects and features may be utilized singularly or, in combination, in order to make improved power tools, including but not limited to, table saws, miter saws. In addition, other objects, features and advantages of the present teachings will be readily understood after reading the following detailed description together with the accompanying drawings and claims. Of course, the additional features and aspects disclosed herein also may be utilized singularly or, in combination with the above-described aspect and features.
As shown in
As shown in
Next, the mechanism for moving motor housing 23 up and down will be explained. Motor housing 23 may be moved up and down by means of rotating handle 31 that projects at the anterior of table 5. Shaft 33 of handle 31 is the same axis as shaft 37 of inclining dial 35. Bevel gear 39 is connected to a tip of shaft 33. Bevel gear 43 engages bevel gear 39, bevel gear 43 being connected to a lower end of threaded shaft 41 that extends in a longitudinal direction.
The upper and lower ends of threaded shaft 41 are fixed to blade hood 21, threaded shaft 41 rotating in one spot without moving up or down. A nut member (not shown) having an inner thread is coupled to threaded shaft 41, and the nut member is fixed to motor housing 23. As a result, when handle 31 is rotated, motor housing 23 is moved up or down by means of the thread feed mechanism of threaded shaft 41 and the nut member. Guide bars 25a and 25b function to guide the up-down movement of motor housing 23.
Next, the mechanism for causing circular blade 3 to incline will be explained. Blade hood 21 may be inclined by rotating inclining dial 35 that has the same axis as handle 31. As shown in
As shown in
Second radar device 87 may monitor a second predetermined area that surrounds the portion of circular blade 3 that protrudes above table 5. As shown in
Next, first radar device 86 and second radar device 87 will be explained in more detail. First, first radar device 86 will be explained.
Waveform shaping circuit 132 may be connected to antenna 124 (specifically, to a radio wave receiving member of antenna 124) via amplifying circuit 128 and filter circuit 130. Amplifying circuit 128 amplifies the signal of the radio waves received by antenna 124. Filter circuit 130 filters noise from the signal amplified by amplifying circuit 128. Waveform shaping circuit 132 shapes the waveform of the signal that was output from filter circuit 130, then outputs the shaped signal to control device 90.
Preferably, microwaves (i.e., frequency: 3–30 GHz) may be used in the radio waves that are output from first radar device 86; in the first representative embodiment, 10.5 GHz microwaves may be used. The radio wave reflection coefficient of wooden work W and the radio wave reflection coefficient of an object other than work (e.g., a operator's hand or finger, etc.) differ greatly with the radio waves of this frequency band, and this difference in radio wave reflection coefficients is utilized to enable discrimination between work W and objects other than work W. Specifically, with radio waves of this frequency band, the radio wave reflection coefficient is low with wood, which has a low moisture content, and the radio wave reflection coefficient is high with objects having a high moisture content. As a result, in the first representative embodiment, the strength of the peak values of the reflected waves are used to determine whether the reflected waves were reflected from work W or from an object other than work which was located above the work W.
As shown in
Next, second radar device 87 will be explained.
Moreover, diode mixer 106 is connected to antenna 104 (specifically, to the radio wave receiving member of antenna 104). Diode mixer 106 is a circuit that mixes the radio waves received by antenna 104, that is, the radio waves that are transmitted from the radio wave transmitting member of antenna 104 and the radio waves that have been reflected by a reflector, and outputs these mixed waves (i.e., diode mixer 106 is a so-called waveform inspection circuit). The output from diode mixer 106 changes on the basis of whether or not a reflector is moving towards second radar device 87. That is, if the reflector is not moving, the radio waves reflected by the reflector have the same frequency as the radio waves transmitted by antenna 104. On the other hand, due to the Doppler effect, if the reflector is moving, the radio waves reflected by the reflector have a frequency different from that of the radio waves transmitted by antenna 104. As a result, if the reflector is moving, radio waves having two close but differing frequencies mutually interfere, causing beats to appear in the output waveform of diode mixer 106. In second radar device 87 of the first representative embodiment, the frequency of these beats is used to measure the speed of movement of the reflector. Furthermore, the output from diode mixer 106 also differs from the frequency of the radio waves output from antenna 104. In the second radar device 87 of the first representative embodiment, the phase difference of the beats produced by the two frequencies of the radio waves created by the reflections from the reflector is used to measure the position of the reflector (i.e., the distance from the second radar device 87).
Two circuit groups are connected with diode mixer 106 via switch 108. That is, the first circuit group may comprise amplifying circuit 110a, filter circuit 112a and waveform shaping circuit 114a. The second circuit group may comprise amplifying circuit 110b, filter circuit 112b, and waveform shaping circuit 114b. The first circuit group is connected to diode mixer 106 while antenna 104 is transmitting radio waves at the first frequency, and the second circuit group is connected to diode mixer 106 while antenna 104 is transmitting radio waves at the second frequency. The structure and effects of the circuits is identical with the circuits used in first radar device 86.
The two waveform shaping circuits 114a and 114b are connected to phase difference measuring circuit 118, whereas only waveform shaping circuit 114a is connected to speed measuring circuit 116. Phase difference measuring circuit 118 is a circuit for measuring the phase difference of the beats observed when the radio waves of both frequencies are transmitted (in other words, measuring the distance of the reflector), and speed measuring circuit 116 is a circuit for measuring the phase difference of the beats observed when the radio waves of the first frequency is transmitted (in other words, measuring the speed of the reflector). The output of phase difference measuring circuit 118 and of speed measuring circuit 116 are both output to control device 90.
Preferably, radio waves of 1 GHz or above may be used in the radio waves output from second radar device 87; in the first representative embodiment, 24.2 GHz microwaves may be used. This is because it is preferred that second radar device 87 monitors only the surroundings of circular blade 3. In other words, as shown in
A representative circuit diagram for controlling table saw 1 will be explained with reference to
First radar device 86 and second radar device 87 are connected to microcomputer 92, and the reflected waveforms output from first radar device 86, and the speed and location of the reflector output from second radar device 87 are input to the microcomputer 92. Power supply circuit 98 is connected to motor M via driving circuit 96, and is connected to microcomputer 92. Power supply circuit 98 is capable of being connected to an external commercial power source, and supplies the power supplied from this external commercial power source to microcomputer 92 and motor M. Further, motor switch 97 for starting motor M is connected to microcomputer 92.
When the power switch has been turned ON, as shown in
Further, when motor switch 97 has been turned ON (YES in step S16), microcomputer 92 outputs a ON signal to driving circuit 96, this starting the supply of power to motor M from power circuit 98, and simultaneously causing the operation of first radar device 86 and second radar device 87. As a result, circular blade 3 begins to rotate, and the measured results from first radar device 86 and second radar device 87 are periodically output. Microcomputer 92 first reads in the output (i.e., the speed and location of the object moving within the second predetermined area) from second radar device 87 (step S18).
Then, microcomputer 92 determines whether the distance from second radar device 87 to the object, which was read in in step S18, is equal to or greater than a predetermined value 1 (step S20). This predetermined value 1 is shorter than the distance from second radar device 87 to circular blade 3. If the measured distance is below the predetermined value 1 (NO in step S20), microcomputer 92 quickly stops motor M (step S30). Specifically, microcomputer 92 outputs an OFF signal to driving circuit 96, this cutting off the supply of power to motor M. By this means, the rotation of motor M is halted.
As described above, the driving operation of motor M is halted when the distance measured by second radar device 87 is below the predetermined value 1 (that is, when an object is between second radar device 87 and circular blade 3). Motor M is halted in this manner because objects extremely close to second radar device 87 prevent second radar device 87 from monitoring the surroundings of circular blade 3.
If the measured distance is equal to or greater than the predetermined value 1 (YES in step S20), microcomputer 92 determines whether the distance from second radar device 87 to the object, which was read in in step S18, is equal to or less than a predetermined value 2 (step S22). This predetermined value 2 is greater than the predetermined value 1, and is longer than the distance from second radar device 87 to circular blade 3. If the measured distance exceeds the predetermined value 2 (NO in step S22), the process proceeds to step S26. On the other hand, if the measured distance is equal to or below the predetermined value 2 (YES in step S22), microcomputer 92 determines whether the speed of the object read in in step S18 is equal to or less than a predetermined speed (step S24). If the speed of the object read in in step S18 is equal to or less than the predetermined speed (YES in step S24), the process proceeds to step S26. If the speed of the object read in in step S18 exceeds the predetermined speed (NO in step S24), microcomputer 92 quickly stops motor M (step S30).
Thus, in the case where the object measured by second radar device 87 is within zone I shown in
Microcomputer 92 proceeds to step S26 and takes up the output waveforms from first radar device 86. Then, microcomputer 92 determines whether the absolute value of the difference between the peak values of the output waveforms taken up in step S8 (that is, the peak values of the reflected waves reflected from the object in the first predetermined area) and the peak values of the output waveforms stored in memory 94 in step S2 (that is, the peak values of the reflected waves reflected from the work in the first predetermined area) is equal to or below a predetermined value 3 (step S28).
If the absolute value of the difference between the peak values of the two output waveforms is equal to or below the predetermined value 3 (YES in step S28), microcomputer 92 determines that an object other than work is not present in the first predetermined area, and returns to step S16. Consequently, if motor switch 97 is in an ON state (YES in Step S16), the process after step S18 is repeated. As a result, the rotation of circular blade 3 continues while being monitored by first radar device 96 and second radar device 87, and the operator can perform the cutting operation by sending the work from the anterior at a safe speed.
On the other hand, if the absolute value of the difference between the peak values of the two output waveforms exceeds the predetermined value 3 (NO in step S28), microcomputer 92 determines that an object other than work is present in the first predetermined area, and stops the driving operation of motor M (step S30).
In summary, in the table saw of the first representative embodiment, the surroundings of circular blade 3 are monitored by second radar device 87, and the vicinity of the outer edge of circular blade 3 is monitored by first radar device 86, this allowing the possibility of contact between circular blade 3 and an object other than work to be detected before this contact is made, and halting the driving operation of motor M. As a result, it is possible to prevent contact between the object other than work and the rotating circular blade 3.
Moreover, only radio waves of a single frequency are transmitted from first radar device 86 and second radar device 87. Consequently, antennas 124 and 104 for receiving the reflected waves can be compact, and it is possible to simplify, for example, the amplifying circuit for amplifying the received reflected waves.
Moreover, in the table saw of the first representative embodiment, the use of blade guard 7 allows the monitored area near circular blade to be restricted, thus limiting the number of radar devices. In other words, by using blade guard 7, all that is monitored is the movement, in the direction in which work is sent, of objects near the circular blade, and only the area near the outer edge of the circular blade is monitored. As a result, operation becomes safer using by means of both blade guard 7 and first radar device 86 and second radar device 87.
Further, in the first representative embodiment, second radar device 87 is attached to the tip of the arm attached to table 5. However, second radar device 87 is not restricted to this type of configuration. For example, second radar device 87 may be disposed according to the methods shown in
Further, in the first representative embodiment, motor M immediately halts when the results measured by first radar device 86 and second radar device 87 fulfill predetermined conditions. However, a configuration is also possible wherein decision criteria are set at two stages; first, the operator is warned when the first stage of the decision criteria is exceeded, then the driving operation of the circular blade is halted when the second stage of the decision criteria is exceeded. For example, the region to the anterior of circular blade 3 in zone II of
Moreover, in the first representative embodiment, single frequency radio waves are transmitted from first radar device 86. However, it is also possible that first radar device 86 transmits radio waves that include all frequencies, such as impulses, and analyzes the frequencies of the reflected waves to more precisely identify objects in the first predetermined area.
Furthermore, in the first representative embodiment, motor M halts when it is determined that there is a likelihood of contact occurring between circular blade 3 and objects other than work. However, it is also possible to provide a retracting mechanism whereby the circular blade is retracted from above to below the table at times of emergency, or to provide a brake mechanism that engages and stop the circular blade at times of emergency.
The table saw of the second representative embodiment has substantially the same configuration as the table saw of the first representative embodiment, differing only in using a microstrip antenna in place of the antenna 104 of second radar device 87 of the first representative embodiment. Consequently, in the following description only the points differing from the first representative embodiment will be explained.
First, the configuration of the microstrip antenna will be explained with reference_to
When signals are input to strip line 132a from an oscillation circuit, the voltage between strip line 132a and flat conductor 136a fluctuates. By this means, radio waves are transmitted between strip line 132a and flat conductor 136a. The transmitted radio waves are sent to the surface 134s of dielectric substrate 134a. Thus, microstrip antenna 130a may be disposed on the power tool such that the objects to be measured approach the surface 134s of dielectric substrate 134a. For example, microstrip antenna 130a may be disposed on a surface of the power tool opposite the objects to be measured.
Preferably, the radio waves transmitted from microstrip antenna 130a may be approximately 1 GHz or above. For example, 24.2 GHz microwaves may be used. The reason is that having the radio waves at a higher frequency improves the directivity thereof, allowing the objects to be measured to be detected with greater accuracy. Furthermore, the frequency of the radio waves transmitted from microstrip antenna 130a may be modified so as to be adapted to the properties of the objects to be measured.
In the example shown in
In the example shown in
Further, in cases where it is not desirable to provide a width like that of dielectric substrate 134b in the example shown in
Moreover, the configurations shown in
The microstrip antennas configured as described above may be disposed in a table surface of the table saw.
A groove is formed in table 144, and dielectric substrate 158 is disposed within this groove. Further, a groove is formed in dielectric substrate 158, and patch 156 is disposed within this groove. As is clear from
As shown in
As is clear from the above description, using the microstrip antenna allows the antenna to be miniaturized, and allows the antenna to be disposed in the surface of the power tool. By this means, a greater degree of design freedom can be obtained concerning the location of the antenna.
The second representative embodiment described above can be embodied with a variety of transformations or improvements thereto. For example, in the example shown in
Further, as shown in
Although the first and the second representative embodiment have been described in terms of a table saw, the present teachings can naturally be applied to other power tools, such as a miter saw, a slide-type table saw, a slide-type circular saw, etc.
Further, a detecting device which performs radio wave sensing by means of a microstrip antenna have been described in detail above. However, this type of detecting device can also be applied to the power tools described below.
The detecting device described above can also be applied to a demolition hammer. During operation, the vibration of a demolition hammer causes the vibration of not only the tool, but also of the operator's body. In particular, if the vibration is great, the head of the operator is also caused to vibrate. On the other hand, the force with which the hammer strikes the work can be reduced, thereby decreasing the vibration transmitted to the operator; however, in this case, operating efficiency falls as the force with which the hammer strikes the work is reduced. To deal with this problem, the vibration, etc. being transmitted to the operator's head can be detected by means of the detecting device, and a structure can be formed for canceling the vibration. Specifically, the demolition hammer may include a counter-balance and a canceling mechanism for canceling the vibration transmitted to the operator via the counter-balance. The demolition hammer may further include the detecting device which, by means of transmitting radio waves towards the operator, detects the movement of the operator relative to the hammer. Doppler radar, for example, can be used as the radio wave sensing method. Further, an antenna (e.g., a microstrip antenna) of the detecting device can be disposed in a location from where the radio waves can be transmitted towards the operator. For example, the antenna may be disposed within an upper face of a housing. The demolition hammer may further include a control device that can control the canceling mechanism in response to the vibration of the operator's head, the vibration having been detected by the detecting device. Moreover, a pick up may be disposed separately within the housing, measured values from this pick up and the detected values from the detecting device being compared, and the counter-balance being adjusted appropriately.
The detecting device described above can be applied to a jig saw. The jig saw cuts wood by pressing the wood against an inner face of a shoe and moving the jig saw while the wood is in this state. The cutting load varies according to the moisture content and thickness of the wood. Accordingly, the moisture content and thickness of the wood can be detected by means of the detecting device and the detected values used as feedback for the rotation speed of a motor, thereby improving cutting operation. Specifically, a microstrip antenna may be disposed within the inner face (preferably, in a cutting direction viewed from saw blade) of the shoe. The method of radio wave sensing may be, for example, a pulse method whereby radio waves are transmitted in pulses, and the reflected waves therefrom are received. A control device may determine the moisture content or the thickness of the work on the basis of peak values of the reflected waves received by the microstrip antenna. The control device then controls the rotation speed of the motor in accordance with this moisture content and thickness. Furthermore, the moisture content and thickness may be displayed to the operator by means of an indicator or the like. Further, in the case where the saw blade is on the point of cutting the support for the work, or foreign materials such as nails etc. are discovered, a warning may be given and the motor halted.
The detecting device described above can be utilized for preventing the theft of power tools (e.g., a compressor). That is, a microstrip antenna can be disposed within an upper face of a housing of the compressor. Doppler radar, for example, can be used as the method of radio wave sensing. Power for the microstrip antenna can be supplied from a battery that can be removably attached to the compressor. If a person approaches the compressor, or tries to move the compressor, this is detected by the microstrip antenna, an alarm is sounded, and the compressor is disabled. By this means, the theft of the compressor can be prevented. On the other hand, the owner of the compressor carries a transmitter. When the compressor receives radio waves transmitted from this transmitter, the alarm is not sounded, and the compressor is not disabled.
Finally, although the preferred representative embodiment has been described in detail, the present embodiment is for illustrative purpose only and not restrictive. It is to be understood that various changes and modifications may be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the appended claims. In addition, the additional features and aspects disclosed herein also may be utilized singularly or in combination with the above aspects and features.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10632642, | Nov 19 2008 | Power Tool Institute | Table saw with table sensor for sensing characteristic of workpiece |
11098849, | May 31 2016 | SawStop Holding LLC | Detection systems for power tools with active injury mitigation technology |
7421932, | May 19 2005 | Power Tool Institute | Power cutting tool comprising a radar sensing system |
7640837, | Aug 14 2000 | SawStop Holding LLC | Table saw with improved safety system |
7644645, | Jan 16 2002 | SawStop Holding LLC | Apparatus and method for detecting dangerous conditions in power equipment |
7661343, | Oct 01 1999 | SawStop Holding LLC | Brake mechanism for power equipment |
7841266, | Jan 22 2007 | NANJING CHERVON INDUSTRY CO , LTD | Proximity sensor for stationary power tools |
7866239, | Dec 31 2003 | SawStop Holding LLC | Elevation mechanism for table saws |
8011279, | Aug 14 2000 | SawStop Holding LLC | Power equipment with systems to mitigate or prevent injury |
8122798, | Nov 19 2008 | Power Tool Institute | Power cutting tool with proximity sensing system |
8490527, | Aug 14 2000 | SawStop Holding LLC | Power equipment with systems to mitigate or prevent injury |
8575549, | Jun 15 2007 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Machine tool monitoring device |
8919231, | Nov 19 2008 | Power Tool Institute | Safety mechanisms for power tools |
8935000, | Sep 04 2006 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Machine tool monitoring device |
9724840, | Mar 13 2001 | SawStop Holding LLC | Safety systems for power equipment |
9927796, | May 17 2001 | SawStop Holding LLC | Band saw with improved safety system |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3725763, | |||
3785230, | |||
4075961, | May 07 1976 | BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC | Injury protection device for machinery |
4345167, | Jul 14 1978 | Capacitance proximity sensor | |
4653189, | Jun 19 1984 | AB Electrolux | Arrangement in a motor saw |
5081406, | Jun 26 1990 | Saf-T-Margin, Inc. | Proximity responsive capacitance sensitive method, system, and associated electrical circuitry for use in controlling mechanical and electro-mechanical equipment |
5214388, | May 28 1992 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the | Phase discriminating capacitive array sensor system |
5345138, | Jul 16 1990 | The Nippon Signal Co., Ltd. | Method and apparatus for assuring safe work |
5436613, | May 13 1993 | Institut de Recherche en Sante et en Securite du Travail | System for detecting human presence in hazardous situations |
5670886, | May 22 1991 | Wolff Controls Corporation | Method and apparatus for sensing proximity or position of an object using near-field effects |
5942975, | Sep 25 1995 | Method and a device for sensing the distance between a first object and a second object | |
6191382, | Apr 02 1998 | Avery Dennison Corporation | Dynamic laser cutting apparatus |
6220134, | Dec 18 1997 | Winkler + Dunnebier AG | Device for separating material web sections from a moving endless material web |
6222481, | Jul 05 1996 | Forsvarets Forskningsanstalt | Method of detecting and classifying objects by means of radar |
6376939, | Apr 02 1999 | Sumitomo Chemical Company, Limited | Sensor apparatus and safety apparatus for protecting approach to machines |
6597308, | Jul 11 2001 | Fujitsu Ten Limited | Radar apparatus |
20020017175, | |||
20020017176, | |||
20020017178, | |||
20020017179, | |||
20020017180, | |||
20020017181, | |||
20020017182, | |||
20020017183, | |||
20020017184, | |||
20020017336, | |||
20020020261, | |||
20020020262, | |||
20020020263, | |||
20020020265, | |||
20020020271, | |||
20020056348, | |||
20020056349, | |||
20020056350, | |||
20020059853, | |||
20020059854, | |||
20020059855, | |||
20020066346, | |||
20020069734, | |||
20030164792, | |||
20030209166, | |||
20040226424, | |||
DE19609771, | |||
EP1061487, | |||
23403, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 07 2005 | Makita Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 21 2009 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 23 2013 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 01 2018 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 18 2018 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 23 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 23 2009 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 23 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 23 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 23 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 23 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 23 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 23 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 23 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 23 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 23 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 23 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |