The spectacle frame has two branches each suitable to be mounted on one distinct from two organic lenses by one of its ends forming a hinge and a bridge suitable to be mounted between the two lenses, a portion of the branches and/or of the bridge including an attachment element penetrating into a blind hole made in the edge of the lenses and bonded in place by an adhesive. The attachment element affects only one point of the edge and is formed of a tongue having a zone intended to penetrate into the blind hole, the penetration zone being of polygonal cross section and including at least one relief for anchoring in the adhesive.
|
1. Spectacle frame comprising two branches each suitable to be mounted on one distinct from two organic lenses by one of its ends forming a hinge and a bridge suitable to be mounted between the said two lenses, a portion of the said branches and/or of the said bridge comprising an attachment means penetrating into a blind hole made in the edge of the said lenses and bonded in place by means of an adhesive, wherein the said attachment means affects only one point of the said edge and is formed of a tongue comprising a zone intended to penetrate into the said blind hole, the said penetration zone being of polygonal cross section and comprising at least one relief for anchoring in the said adhesive.
2. Frame according to
3. Frame according to
4. Frame according to
5. Frame according to
6. Frame according to
7. Frame according to
8. Frame according to
9. Frame according to
10. Frame according to
11. Frame according to
12. Spectacles incorporating a frame according to
|
The present invention relates to a so-called “three-piece” spectacle frame.
More precisely, it relates to a frame which, in conventional manner, comprises two branches each suitable to be mounted on one distinct from two organic lenses by one of its ends forming a hinge, and a bridge suitable to be mounted between the two lenses, a frame which belongs to the type in which a portion of the branches and/or of the bridge comprises an attachment means penetrating into a blind hole made in the edge of the lenses and bonded in place by means of an adhesive.
A frame of this type is known according to EP-B-0 787 314 of the Applicant, a patent which provides for the use of a fastening lug engaging with the edge of the lens over 5–10 mm and provided with at least one spur capable of penetrating into a blind hole made in the edge of the lenses and of being bonded in place therein.
Although these frames have the advantage of being light and discreet thanks to attachment means which avoid the encirclement of the periphery of the lenses without, for all that, having to traverse the lenses from the front face to the rear face, they have the disadvantage of requiring a particular expertise of the optician who mounts the lenses. Specifically, although EP-B-0 787 314 provides that the fastening lug that engages over 5–10 mm with the edge of the lens may comprise only one spur penetrating into the edge of the lens, in practice, two spurs are used to prevent the frame from “turning”. The result is that each attachment point requires the piercing of two holes in the edge of the lens, with a dual difficulty: maintaining the spacing and maintaining the parallelism of the two spurs. Without an ability or particular technical means of assistance, the operation frequently ended in the breakage of the lens.
It has now been ascertained, in a completely unexpected manner, that it was not essential to cause the attachment to interact with 5–10 mm of the edge of the lens and that a single penetration in the edge of the lens for each attachment could be sufficient, provided that the geometry of the attachment piece is appropriately designed.
Thus, according to the invention, the attachment means affects only one point of the edge of the lens and it consists of a tongue comprising a zone intended to penetrate into the blind hole made in the edge of the lens, the said penetration zone being of polygonal cross-section and comprising at least one relief for anchoring in the adhesive.
Thanks to this arrangement, the number of holes to be drilled in the edge of the lens is halved and the difficulty of the piercing, per attachment, of two holes strictly parallel and at a precise spacing, is eliminated.
To ensure that the tongue is reliably secured in the blind hole, the penetration zone must have corrugations in which the adhesive will settle, forming as many anchoring points.
In a first embodiment, the corrugation that forms the anchoring relief consists of at least one groove made in the penetration zone, in a plane orthogonal to the longitudinal axis of the said blind hole.
It is understood that, when the grooved zone penetrates the blind hole previously coated with adhesive, the adhesive flows into the groove or grooves and, when it sets, it immobilizes the tongue in place in the blind hole.
In another possible embodiment, the anchoring relief consists of a barb made in the penetration zone, a barb which is oriented to resist extraction from the blind hole, once the tongue is bonded in place.
Preferably, the blind hole is of circular cross section and its diameter is such that the said circular cross section circumscribes the polygonal cross section of the said penetration zone, but for the clearance necessary for penetration.
This configuration ensures a guidance of the tongue when it penetrates into the blind hole.
In a preferred embodiment, the sides of the polygonal cross section of the penetration zone have an approximate length lying between 5/10 and 15/10 mm.
In a preferred embodiment, the cross section of the penetration zone has the shape of a rectangle parallelogram, which may be square or rectangular.
Better still, the cross section in a rectangle parallelogram is rectangular with a width of approximately 7/10 mm and a length of approximately 12/10 mm.
In any case, it is desirable for the penetration zone to have a length lying between 10 and 60/10 mm.
In one embodiment, the tongue may be made in one piece with the portion of the branches and/or of the bridge, which simplifies the production of the frame by reducing the number of pieces to be assembled.
Thus, the tongue may consist of a terminal portion of a hinge lug.
However, in an embodiment that is particularly lightweight, discreet and aesthetic, the tongue consists of a terminal portion of a branch without a hinge. In this case, it is the branch itself which penetrates into the edge of the lens.
The invention also relates to spectacles incorporating such frames.
The invention will be further detailed hereinafter, with reference to the appended drawings in which:
The structure of the tongue 7 emerges more clearly in
As emerges from
For the assembly, the optician pierces the blind hole 10, coats it with adhesive 15 and inserts the said penetration zone 8 into the hole ensuring that he orients the branch appropriately. The adhesive then insinuates itself into the grooves 13, thus fixing the penetration zone 8 of the tongue 7 in the blind hole 10. The optician may also, before inserting the tongue 7 into the blind hole 10, coated with adhesive, cover the penetration zone 8 also with adhesive to ensure that the grooves 13 are filled. A cyanoacrylic glue for example may be used as the adhesive.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7717553, | May 19 2005 | INSPECS LIMITED | Spectacles |
7967431, | Sep 23 2008 | DONGUAN JI SHENG OPTICAL LIMITED | Spectacles |
8256893, | Apr 22 2008 | Hoya Corporation | Holding structures for spectacle lenses, spectacles, and method of manufacturing spectacles |
8465149, | Sep 23 2008 | Spectacles |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5847800, | Dec 13 1996 | Lens holding mechanism of spectacles | |
6290355, | Oct 26 2000 | Eyeglasses with lenses changeable | |
6877855, | Jul 08 2003 | Spectacles with peripheral lens support | |
DE20207372, | |||
EP718660, | |||
FR2711810, | |||
FR2748128, | |||
WO9612983, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 15 2010 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 08 2010 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Aug 08 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Feb 08 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 08 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Aug 08 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Aug 08 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Feb 08 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 08 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Aug 08 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Aug 08 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Feb 08 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Aug 08 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Aug 08 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |