Methods and Apparatuses for generating and distributing a clock signal between components within a semiconductor chip. According to one embodiment of the invention, a clock generator, distributed over an integrated circuit, includes a plurality of cells each coupled to multiple adjacent ones of the plurality of cells by different clock wires; wherein, for each of the plurality of clock wires, the cell on one end generates the rising edge and the cell on the other end generates the falling edge. According to another embodiment of the invention, an integrated circuit includes a distributed clock generator and a plurality of sets of synchronous logic. The distributed clock generator includes a plurality of cells and a plurality of clock wires. The plurality of clock wires each couple together two of said plurality of cells such that said plurality of cells are coupled together in grid. The plurality of cells, responsive to a mixing of previous clock edges produced by at least certain of said plurality of cells, detect when to produce the next clock edge. The plurality of sets of synchronous logic each have a clock input. Each clock input of each of these sets is coupled to a different one of said plurality of clock wires.
|
37. A method for generating a clock in a distributed manner, said method comprising:
each of a plurality of cells, coupled to adjacent others of said plurality of cells to receive clock signals, performing the following,
determining a moment in time based upon die arrival times of current clock edges of received clock signals;
delaying a period of time after said moment in time; and
triggering a next clock edge to said adjacent others of said plurality of cells after said delaying.
1. A distributed clock generator comprising:
a plurality of cells each including,
a plurality of terminals,
a cumulative clock edge detection circuit coupled to said plurality of terminals and having an output,
a delay/amplification circuit coupled to said output of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit, and
a driver circuit coupled to said plurality of terminals and to said delay/amplification circuit;
a plurality or clock wires, each of said plurality of clock wires coupling one of said plurality of terminals of one of said plurality of cells to one of said plurality of terminals of another or said plurality of cells.
14. An integrated circuit comprising:
a distributed clock generator including a plurality of cells collectively having a plurality of terminal pairs, each of said plurality of terminal pairs including a charging terminal coupled to a discharging terminal to have generated there between a clock signal having its two edges defined by alternating activation/deactivation of the charging terminal and the discharging terminal, the terminals of each of said plurality of terminal pairs being part of two different ones of said plurality of cells, said plurality of cells coupled together as a result of each being coupled to certain others of said plurality of cells by said plurality of terminal pairs; and
a plurality of sets of synchronous logic each having a clock input, each clock input of each of said sets coupled to receive the clock signal of one of said plurality of terminal pairs.
24. A cell of a distributed clock generator comprising:
a set of terminals of said cell, each of said terminals in said set being one terminal of a different terminal pair, each of said terminal pairs including a charging terminal coupled to a discharging terminal to have generated there between a clock signal having its two edges defined by alternating activation/deactivation of the charging terminal and the discharging terminal;
a cumulative clock edge detection circuit coupled to said set of terminals to determine a single clock edge transition time reflective of transitions of said clock signals on said terminals,
a driver circuit coupled to said set of terminals; and
a delay/amplification circuit, coupled to an output of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit and to said driver circuit, to cause another clock edge transition of said clock signals to substantially simultaneously occur some delay time after each of said single clock edge transition times.
2. The distributed clock generator of
3. The distributed clock generator of
4. The distributed clock generator of
5. The distributed clock generator of
6. The distributed clock generator of
7. The distributed clock generator of
8. The distributed clock generator of
9. The distributed clock generator of
a plurality of transistors each having a gate, a source, and a drain, each of the gates of said plurality of transistors of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled to a different one of said plurality of terminals, the drains or said plurality of transistors of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled to together to form a node to provide said output, and the sources of said plurality of transistors of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled some to positive and others to negative supply.
10. The distributed clock generator of
a plurality of inverters each having an input and output, each of the inputs or said plurality of inverters of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled to a different one of said plurality of terminals, the outputs of said plurality of inverters of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled to together to form a node to provide said output.
11. The distributed clock generator of
a plurality of transistors each having a gate, a source, and a drain, each of the drains of said plurality of transistors of said driver circuit are coupled to a different one of said plurality of terminals, the gates of said plurality of transistors of said driver circuit are shorted together, and the sources of said plurality of transistors of said driver circuit are coupled to either positive or negative supply.
12. The distributed clock generator of
13. The distributed clock generator of
15. The integrated circuit of
16. The integrated circuit of
17. The integrated circuit of
18. The integrated circuit of
19. The integrated circuit of
20. The integrated circuit of
21. The integrated circuit of
22. The integrated circuit of
23. The integrated circuit of
27. The cell of
28. The cell of
a plurality of transistors each having a gate, a source, and a drain, each of the gates of said plurality of transistors of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit arc coupled to a different one of said set of terminals, the drains of said plurality of transistors of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled to together to form a node, and the sources of said plurality of transistors of said cumulative clock edge detection circuit are coupled some to positive and others to negative supply.
29. The cell of
a plurality of transistors each having a gate, a source, and a drain, each of the drains of said plurality of transistors of said driver circuit are coupled to a different one of said set of terminals, the gates of said plurality of transistors of said driver circuit are shorted together, and the sources of said plurality of transistors of said driver circuit are coupled to either positive or negative supply.
30. The cell of
31. The cell of
32. The cell of
33. The cell of
34. The cell of
35. The cell of
38. The method of
|
1. Field
Embodiments of the invention relate to the field of generating clock signals for a digital system. More specifically, the invention relates to methods and apparatuses for generating and distributing a clock signal between components within an integrated circuit.
2. Background
The Mealy machine illustrates four elements of computing. Most prominent is the computation cloud. In VLSI systems, computation is performed by logic gates constructed from transistors. Next is the state holding element. Traditionally state holding elements are flip-flops, although they could be latches. The third element is the clock that determines when the state holding element updates. Last is the communication represented by the wire from the output of the state holding element to the computation cloud.
The abstraction might lead one to believe that the state of the computer is located, manipulated and updated at a single physical location. Rather the state holding and computation is distributed across a large plane. Communication is not limited to a single wire, but many wires that branch and merge and form long and short channels. These realities do not disturb the model as long as each of the state holding elements receives its update signal at substantially the same time and all of the computation is completed when it is time to update to the next state. Synchronous computing evolved from this model.
Unfortunately the factors that contribute to the speed of computing have changed since the Mealy machine model was adapted. The detail that seems insignificant by the Mealy machine, communication, has grown in importance while the most emphasized property, computation, has diminished. The Mealy machine was introduced when chips were relatively small and communication costs were negligible. Clock cycles were on the order of 50–100 gate delays and slight perturbations in the clock arrival time resulted in error margins that were a fraction of a percent of the clock cycle time.
Transistor mismatches, fabrication imperfections, unstable supplies, and a host of other phenomenon make it very difficult to copy a signal to a multitude of locations over a large chip clocked in the giga-Hertz range to an accuracy that supports the Mealy model. High performance microprocessors have clocks that switch many billions of times per second. The cycle time is typically on the order of 8–10 gate delays. This high speed clock signal is copied through many millimeters of interconnect and is sometimes amplified by 20+ buffers. The skew between two copies of a signal derived through millimeters of interconnect and 20+ buffers begins to approach an 8–10 gate delay cycle time.
The synchronous paradigm is built upon the assumption that clock and data signals have determinative delays. The clock tree assumes that a signal that is buffered through physically separate yet identically designed paths produces identical signals at the end of those paths. Very little certainty exist in modern transistor processes and each new process has even less certainty than the last. Transistors and interconnect of equivalent dimensions will have different delays. These differences are no longer negligible.
Typically, the clock signal is generated at a single source and is distributed through chains of inverters of equal length to the individual latches. It is important that the clock signal arrives at each data latch at nearly the same time, so that operations that take place in one part of a circuit are properly synchronized with operations in other parts of the circuit.
However, it is impossible to match exactly the delay of all paths from the source of the clock signal to the individual latches. Cross-die processing variations and imprecision in the alignment of the fabrication equipment make this impossible. To complicate matters, die sizes are becoming larger, resulting in greater die variations and longer inverter chains, which result in greater path disparities.
As clock speeds increase, these disparities consume an increasingly larger fraction of the clock period. The disparity in the arrival time of a clock signal between latches is called “skew.” Note that skew causes uncertainty about the time that data is latched. Furthermore, note that calculations cannot be performed during periods when it is not certain that the data is valid. As clock speeds increase, the skew between latches remains approximately constant. Hence, a smaller fraction of the clock period can be used for calculations.
The traditional method for distributing a clock signal is to use an H-tree topology. A square area of the integrated circuit is divided into quadrants and the centers of each quadrant are connected by an ‘H’ interconnect topology. Each of the three segments of the ‘H’ is equal to half the length of the sides of the square integrated circuit. The distance of the path from each prong to the center of the perpendicular segment, or the root, of the ‘H’ is equivalent. The prongs are called leaves in keeping with the tree image.
An area can be divided into 16 regions by superimposing an ‘H’ onto a square integrated circuit and then centering four ‘H's’ half the size of the initial ‘H’ onto the leaves of the first ‘H’. A square integrated circuit can be divided into 4^n regions, for any power of n, by recursively applying this method. A signal applied at the root of the largest ‘H’ is copied to all the leaves at substantially the same time.
Note that although the path from the root to each leaf is equivalent by design, there will be some disparity between all paths due to physical irregularities and fabrication resolutions. Although each path from the root to the leaves contains interconnect of equivalent length, and gates of equivalent size and number, separate paths are only equal to the resolution of the fabrication equipment. The more the paths from root to leaf diverge, the more skew tends to accumulate.
Note that there will be a place in an H-tree system where two adjacent signals will be derived through maximally different routes through the tree. This is typically where the skew is at a maximum.
Clock skew can be compensated for by adding a timing margin to the clock cycle time. However, this added timing margin can become a significant fraction of the clock period, and can hence limit system performance.
One way to deal with this problem is to divide an integrated circuit into multiple clock domains, where each clock domain operates from an independent clock. This relieves some of the difficulty in copying a signal across a large area of silicon to arrive at separate locations at substantially the same time. However, dividing an integrated circuit into multiple independent clock domains creates problems in synchronizing communications or data transfers between the different clock domains.
Another solution is to provide larger buffers and to use less resistive interconnect in the clock distribution circuitry. This solution uses more power and causes stronger electromagnetic fields to be emitted from the clock net which is seen as noise by other signals. Power consumption and signal noise are both limiting factors for processor performance.
Methods and Apparatuses for generating and distributing a clock signal between components within a semiconductor chip are described. According to one embodiment of the invention, a clock generator, distributed over an integrated circuit, includes a plurality of cells each coupled to multiple adjacent ones of the plurality of cells by different clock wires; wherein, for each of the plurality of clock wires, the cell on one end generates the rising edge and the cell on the other end generates the falling edge. According to another embodiment of the invention, an integrated circuit includes a distributed clock generator and a plurality of sets of synchronous logic. The distributed clock generator includes a plurality of cells and a plurality of clock wires. The plurality of clock wires each couple together two of said plurality of cells such that said plurality of cells are coupled together in grid. The plurality of cells, responsive to a mixing of previous clock edges produced by at least certain of said plurality of cells, detect when to produce the next clock edge. The plurality of sets of synchronous logic each have a clock input. Each clock input of each of these sets is coupled to a different one of said plurality of clock wires.
The invention may best be understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings that are used to illustrate embodiments of the invention. In the drawings:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth. However, it is understood that embodiments of the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known circuits, structures and techniques have not been shown in detail in order not to obscure the understanding of this description. Thus, various modifications to the disclosed embodiments are apparent, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments and applications without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Thus, the invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and features disclosed herein.
References in the specification to “one embodiment”, “an embodiment”, “an example embodiment”, etc., indicate that the embodiment described may include a particular feature, structure, or characteristic, but every embodiment may not necessarily include the particular feature, structure, or characteristic. Moreover, such phrases are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment. Further, when a particular feature, structure, or characteristic is described in connection with an embodiment, it is submitted that it is within the knowledge of one skilled in the art to affect such feature, structure, or characteristic in connection with other embodiments whether or not explicitly described.
In the following description and claims, the terms “coupled” and “connected,” along with their derivatives, may be used. It should be understood that these terms are not intended as synonyms for each other. Rather, in particular embodiments, “connected” be used to indicate that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact with each other. “Coupled” may mean that two or more elements are in direct physical or electrical contact. However, “coupled” may also mean that two or more elements are not in direct contact with each other, but yet still co-operate or interact with each other.
The data structures and code (e.g., that specify the layout of an integrated circuit including the invention, that produces data structures and code that specify the layout of an integrated circuit including the invention, etc.) are typically stored on a machine-readable storage medium. A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism that provides (i.e., stores and/or transmits) information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). For example, a machine-readable medium includes read only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); magnetic disk storage media; optical storage media; flash memory devices; electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.); etc.
Overview
Methods and Apparatuses for generating and distributing a clock signal between components within a semiconductor chip are described. Embodiments of the invention rely upon asynchronous type detection techniques. Events, such as the generation of a falling/rising clock edge, are only initiated after other events are detected, such as a rising/falling clock edge. Rather than rely upon a single detected falling/rising clock edge to determine when the rising/falling clock edge is triggered, embodiments of the invention rely upon the detection of a plurality of falling/rising clock edges and triggers the rising/falling clock edge based upon their arrival times. It is assumed that each signal detected is intended to operate at the same phase and frequency, just as the different leafs in a clock tree operate.
The phase mixing of the cumulative clock edge detection circuit reacts to the possibly differing arrival times of the clock edges by determining a moment in time for the cumulative clock edge detection circuit's single output clock edge transition. Thus, the moment in time for the cumulative clock edge detection circuit's single output clock edge transition that is reflective of the input clock edge transitions. In particular, the mixed phase becomes an average phase when the difference in the arrival times of the clock edges are within a period of time roughly equivalent to the rise/fall time of the clock signal. If the arrival times are substantially longer than this, then this circuit no longer averages phase but responds in a time that is a non-linear function of the input phases. The synchronization behavior of the cell is retained regardless.
The terminals to a cell coincide with the terminals to the cumulative clock edge detection circuit. A number of cells are coupled in a grid topology (e.g., a rectangular two-dimensional grid topology) over the area of the integrated circuit to be clocked by the distributed clock generator. The cells are coupled by relatively long wires that initiate and terminate at these terminals. The signals on this collection of long wires are copies of the clock signal. A useful number for the choice of terminals to the cells is four. This number allows you to position the four terminals 90 degrees apart from each other on the periphery of the cell. Manhattan routing methods, standard cell design, and power grid distribution apparatus typically impose regular rectangular geometries. The rectangular grid clocking topology is easily integrated into a typical VLSI chip because they use these structures and techniques. However, alternative numbers of terminals per cell, routing methods, cell designs, and/or power grid distribution apparatus can be used.
The cumulative clock edge detection circuit initiates an event when the mixed phase of a plurality of signals on the terminals to the cumulative clock edge detection circuit has a voltage transition. In certain embodiments, once the mixed phase of the arrival time of a clock edge on the plurality of wires is detected, a transition is generated in the opposite direction on the detected wires. This second edge is enacted by the driver circuit. The driver circuit contains one driver for each of the detected wires. Each of these drivers is triggered by the same event. Because the drivers are triggered by the same event, the enacted clock edge on the plurality of wires will be synchronized on that edge. Even though the, say, falling edges might arrive to the cumulative clock edge detection circuit out of phase with respect to each other, their rising edges will then be in phase with each other.
As stated above, the cumulative clock edge detection circuit generates an event that signals a transition on the plurality of its terminals. This transition signal is delayed and amplified by the delay/amplification circuit to drive the driver circuit. Embodiments in which the cumulative clock edge detection circuit is implemented using small transistors (e.g., so that the clock signals are not heavily loaded) and the driver circuit is implemented using larger transistors (e.g., to drive long wires that traverse a significant fraction of the integrated circuit), the delay/amplification circuits provides the needed amplification. Because the cycle time of the clock that is generated and distributed is determined by the delay of the gates within the cells, the delay/amplification circuit provides the proper delay to give a proper duration to the clock period. The longer the delay, the longer a HI or LO voltage on the clock wires will remain before being transitioned to the opposite value. This delay can be fixed or tunable depending on implementation.
In this manner, embodiments of the invention generate and distribute the clock signal so that synchronous circuit elements (including state holding elements such as latches, flip-flops, etc.) at different locations on the semiconductor chip remain properly synchronized (e.g., even at relatively high clock speeds). In addition, embodiments of the invention are implemented to be relatively efficient with respect to space, componentry and power. Also, embodiments of the invention can be implemented to not be excessively noisy.
Two Cell Type Embodiments
One embodiment of this invention uses two varieties of cells: pull-up cells and pull-down cells. The two types of cells alternate like the red and black squares on a checkerboard. The interior cells are coupled to four cells of the complementary type by relatively long wires. The signal on the wires coupling the two types of cells are different copies of the logical clock signal. The pull-up cells are responsible for charging the clock wires to a high voltage. The pull-down cells are responsible for discharging the clock wires to a low voltage.
Pull-Up Cell
Pull-Down Cell
In another embodiment of the invention, the cumulative clock edge detection circuit in cells 100 and 200 includes four inverters in place of the transistors. The input to each inverter is coupled to one of the cell's terminals and the outputs of the inverters are shorted together. The node formed by the shorted output of the inverters is the output of the cumulative clock edge detection circuit.
In another embodiment of the invention, the inverters in the amplification/delay circuit are embodied with variable delay inverters. This allows the clock period to be tuned.
Two-dimensional Grid of Pull-Up and Pull-Down Cells
In one embodiment of the invention, the cells in the corners of the two dimensional grid, 301, 304, 313 and 316, are coupled to only two other cells with wires that carry the clock signal. Instead of coupling to the other cells with a single wire through a single terminal, the corner cells couple to the other cells with two wires that each are coupled through a single terminal.
The cells that are on the sides of the two dimensional grid but not in the corners, 302, 303, 305, 308, 309, 312, 314, and 315, are coupled to only three other cells. Two of those cells will be on the same side of the grid and will couple through either one or two clock wires—in other words, the cells sharing the same side of the grid connect their extra terminal to the extra terminal of the adjacent cell of the complementary type.
In another embodiment, multiple wires that are running between the same cells are merged, for example 350 and 351.
Note that the dimensions of the grid, 4×4, are arbitrary. The apparatus described scales to any size as long as the columns and rows are even. A third dimension may also be added should integrated circuit technology progress to allow it.
Note that all of the clock wires in
The duty cycle of the clock in embodiments using the pull-up and pull-down cells can be controlled in two ways. First, the relative delays of the pull-up and pull-down cells can be varied. The longer the delay of the pull-up cell is relative to the pull-down cell, the longer the duty cycle will be. Second, the end of the clock wire that is coupled to the pull-up cell charges to a high voltage before, and discharges to a low voltage after, the end of the clock wire coupled to the pull-down cell. In other words, the duty cycle is longer on the wire near the pull-up cell. The 50% duty cycle point is near the center of the wire. The duty cycle variation of the wire depends on the resistance and capacitance properties of the wire. Thus, the duty cycle of the signal used to drive the synchronous logic is dependent on where along the wire the signal is tapped. The duty cycle is greatest at the drain of the pull-up drive transistor in the pull-up cell and least at the drain of the pull-down drive transistor in the pull-down cell. The amount of variation depends on the RC time constant of the wire and the fraction of the RC constant contributed by resistance.
Hybrid Cell Embodiments
Operation
The frequency of the clock generation and distribution system described is determined by the delays of the gates within the cells. For example, the cells used in the clock distribution apparatus shown in
The inputs of the NAND gate 810 are coupled to the node 813 and the START signal. The input to the initialization inverter 806 is coupled to receive the START signal. The output of the initialization inverter 806 is coupled to the gates of the pull-down transistors 802–805. The sources of the pull-down transistors 802–805 are coupled to ground or negative voltage. Each of the drains of the pull-down transistors 802–805 is coupled to a different one of the terminals (the drains of pull-down transistors 802–805 are respectively coupled to the terminals 100.S, 100.W, 100.N, and 100.E). When the START signal is applied LO, the pull-down transistors initialize and hold the clock wires LO. When the START signal is applied LO the output of the NAND gate is HI and the input to the driving circuit of cell 881 is also HI. This driving circuit is not able to generate a clock edge on the terminals when its input is HI.
In another embodiment of invention, rather than initializing the clock with the pull-up cells, the pull-down cells are used. In this embodiment, all of the clock wires are initialized HI by using circuits that are complementary to that found in
Note that a clock signal in a conventional clock distribution system is generated from a single source. Whereas, the invention generates a clock signal through the interaction of a large number of cells distributed across the semiconductor die. Furthermore, note that a conventional clock distribution scheme is an open loop system. Hence, once the clock signal is generated it is propagated to the latches without compensation for die variations or transistor variations along the chain of inverters to the individual latches. In contrast, the invention provides a closed loop system that adapts to the conditions on the semiconductor die.
Furthermore, note that the clock signal is generated by the ping-pong action of two types of cells (or the hybrid cells) that are spatially separated.
Note that the current moves in a single direction on the clock wires. This mitigates electromagnetic fields produced by moving charges.
While in certain embodiments of the invention the terminals driven by like transistors within a cell are shorted (e.g., the terminals N, S, E and W in
Also notice that the delay in any wire or logic in cells or the clock wires will have an effect on every other cell and wire in the system that diminishes the further the point is from the delayed cell. This limits skew to slow variations instead of the sudden skew variations found in state holding elements driven by clock signals derived through different branches of the H-tree.
Note that the power distribution system on an integrated circuit typically uses a two-dimensional grid structure and when possible is used as shielding for the noisy clock signal. In at least certain embodiments of invention, the cells and the clock wires are routed between positive and negative supply. Besides the layout and routing benefits, this leads to essentially free shielding (because the power supply provides the shielding) and shorter current return paths.
Note that embodiments of the invention do not use oscillators that are distributed across a chip and then coupled together. Rather it is an oscillator that is distributed across a chip. An oscillator cell (e.g.,
Alternative Embodiments
While embodiments of the invention has been described in relation to two dimensional fabrication techniques, other embodiment of the invention are implementable using three dimensional fabrication techniques. For example, in implementations using the two cell type approach, instead of the checker board illustration used earlier, imagine dice that are tightly packed such that the face on each die aligns with another. Each die is one of two types, red or black. Each die has a single dot on each face. Each red die is surrounded by six black dice and vice versa. Now replace the red and black die with six terminal pull-up and pull-down cells respectively. The cells are coupled by long clock wires that run through the dot on each face. Specifically, in one embodiment the third dimension is realized by adding two terminals to the four terminal cells. One of the extra terminals would project into the paper on which
While embodiments have been described with four terminals and a certain mixture of pull-up/pull-down drive transistors (hybrid cells having equal numbers of pull-up and pull down drive transistors; pull-up cells and pull-down cells respectively having all pull-up and pull-down driver transistors), alternative embodiments have a different number of terminals and/or a different mixture of pull-up/pull down driver transistors. In other words, the different cells of a distributed clock generator can any number and/or combination of pull-up and pull-down driver transistors, as long as the clock wire that couples two terminals of separate cells are driven by complementary drivers (e.g., if the driver whose drain is connected to a terminal is a pull-up transistor, then the driver connected to the terminal on the other end of the clock wire must be a pull-down transistor).
While the flow diagram shows a particular order of operations performed by certain embodiments of the invention, it should be understood that such order is exemplary (e.g., alternative embodiments may perform the operations in a different order, combine certain operations, overlap certain operations, etc.)
While the invention has been described in terms of several embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention is not limited to the embodiments described, but can be practiced with modification and alteration within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. The description is thus to be regarded as illustrative instead of limiting.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7659126, | Jan 22 2007 | KLA-Tencor Technologies Corporation | Electrical test method and apparatus |
7791394, | Jul 19 2004 | Technische Universitat Wien | Decentralised fault-tolerant clock pulse generation in VLSI chips |
9024683, | Oct 16 2009 | Altera Corporation | Method and apparatus for reducing power spikes caused by clock networks |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5592127, | Aug 30 1994 | NEC Corporation | Voltage-controlled oscillator with reduced phase difference |
5640112, | Feb 28 1994 | Fujitsu Microelectronics Limited | Clock signal distributing system |
5712883, | Jan 03 1996 | Credence Systems Corporation | Clock signal distribution system |
5883534, | May 31 1996 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Waveform shaping device and clock supply apparatus |
5892373, | Jan 29 1997 | AMD TECHNOLOGIES HOLDINGS, INC ; GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | Distributed gated clock driver |
6037820, | Dec 12 1997 | Fujitsu Limited | Clock distribution circuit in a semiconductor integrated circuit |
6057724, | Jul 13 1998 | GOOGLE LLC | Method and apparatus for synchronized clock distribution |
6118304, | Nov 20 1997 | Apple Inc | Method and apparatus for logic synchronization |
6191658, | Oct 21 1999 | Oracle America, Inc | High speed coupled oscillator topology |
6305001, | Jun 18 1998 | Bell Semiconductor, LLC | Clock distribution network planning and method therefor |
6400230, | Oct 21 1999 | Oracle America, Inc | Method and apparatus for generating and distributing a clock signal |
6531897, | Jun 30 2000 | Intel Corporation | Global clock self-timed circuit with self-terminating precharge for high frequency applications |
6538957, | May 14 2001 | SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT INC | Apparatus and method for distributing a clock signal on a large scale integrated circuit |
6552589, | Oct 21 1999 | CAVIUM INTERNATIONAL; MARVELL ASIA PTE, LTD | Method and apparatus for process independent clock signal distribution |
6657502, | Oct 01 2001 | SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Multiphase voltage controlled oscillator |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 02 2003 | Scott, Fairbanks | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 10 2008 | FAIRBANKS, SCOTT | Sun Microsystems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 022137 | /0384 | |
Feb 12 2010 | ORACLE USA, INC | Oracle America, Inc | MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037302 | /0661 | |
Feb 12 2010 | Sun Microsystems, Inc | Oracle America, Inc | MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037302 | /0661 | |
Feb 12 2010 | Oracle America, Inc | Oracle America, Inc | MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 037302 | /0661 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 14 2010 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 14 2010 | STOL: Pat Hldr no Longer Claims Small Ent Stat |
May 17 2010 | R2551: Refund - Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Sep 02 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 26 2014 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 12 2018 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 24 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 24 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 24 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 24 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 24 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 24 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 24 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 24 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |