A multi-tray distillation unit having a separator for de-entraining liquid particles which are picked up by an upwardly flowing gaseous stream which is flowing countercurrent to a descending liquid flow in the unit. The separator which is placed above the contact plate on which the gas contacts the liquid, comprises vertically spaced tiers of elongated, substantially horizontal open-topped liquid collector channels arrayed in parallel rows transversely to the flow of the gas. The liquid collector channels are vertically staggered to deflect the gas flow from a lower tier level through the gaps between the collection channels of an upper tier and around the channels so as to cause the entrained liquid particles to separate from the gaseous stream by inertia into the channels of the lower tier. The collected liquid is then returned through a liquid downcomer to a contact plate. An improved channel configuration has a rigidly-mounted, horizontally-elongated flow deflector extending downwards from an upper tier channel toward a lower tier channel, this provides gas flow deflection and increased efficiency of liquid particle de-entrainment. The flow deflector may be mounted directly on each upper tier channel. The channels may be formed from a single crimped and perforated metal sheet or the like, and adjacent formed tiers may be stacked to form a de-entrainment zone array. The lower tier channels may be formed from a single metal sheet having a channel bottom and sides, with a foraminous section extending upwardly from one side and a transverse section extending away from the lower channel, and terminating in a flow deflector adjacent to the bottom of a channel of an upper tier.
|
8. A separation system for de-entraining liquid particles from an upwardly flowing gaseous stream comprising:
a de-entrainment zone of vertically spaced, parallel tiers of elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed transversely to the flow of the gaseous stream,
wherein each tier having parallel rows of collector channels which are staggered vertically from the rows in the next adjacent tier to deflect the flow of the gaseous stream from a lower tier through gaps between adjacent rows in an upper tier, to separate entrained liquid from the gaseous stream and permit the separated liquid to descend into channels of a lower tier for collection, with a plurality of horizontally-elongated flow deflectors extending parallel to each channel in the region between an upper tier and an adjacent lower tier, in a direction downwards towards a channel of the lower tier,
wherein the channels of the lower tier have foraminous extensions in the region between the upper tier and the lower tier, and the channels of an upper tier have downwardly extending deflectors attached to their bottom portions.
9. A separation system for de-entraining liquid particles from an upwardly flowing gaseous stream comprising:
a de-entrainment zone of vertically spaced, parallel tiers of elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed transversely to the flow of the gaseous stream,
wherein each tier having parallel rows of collector channels which are staggered vertically from the rows in the next adjacent tier to deflect the flow of the gaseous stream from a lower tier through gaps between adjacent rows in an upper tier, to separate entrained liquid from the gaseous stream and permit the separated liquid to descend into channels of a lower tier for collection, with a plurality of horizontally-elongated flow deflectors extending parallel to each channel in the region between an upper tier and an adjacent lower tier, in a direction downwards towards a channel of the lower tier,
wherein each flow deflector is attached to a bottom portion of a channel of the upper tier and the channels of an upper tier have foraminous extensions in the region above the upper tier, to which downwardly extending deflectors are attached.
4. A multi-tray distillation unit comprising:
at least one contact tray for contacting a gaseous stream flowing upwardly in the unit with liquid passing downwardly through the unit; and
at least one separator for de-entraining liquid particles from the gaseous stream after passing through liquid on the contact plate, the at least one separator comprising vertically spaced, parallel tiers of elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed transversely to the flow of the gaseous stream,
wherein each tier having parallel rows of collector channels which are staggered vertically from the rows in the next adjacent tier to deflect the flow of the gaseous stream from a lower tier through gaps between adjacent rows in an upper tier, to separate entrained liquid from the gaseous stream and permit the separated liquid to descend into channels of a lower tier for collection,
wherein each upper tier channel having at least one rigidly-mounted, horizontally-elongated flow deflector extending downward from the upper tier channel towards a lower tier channel below the deflector,
wherein the channels of an upper tier have foraminous extensions in the region above the upper tier, to which downwardly extending deflectors are attached.
1. A multi-tray distillation unit comprising:
at least one contact tray for contacting a gaseous stream flowing upwardly in the unit with liquid passing downwardly through the unit; and
at least one separator for de-entraining liquid particles from the gaseous stream after passing through liquid on the contact plate, the at least one separator comprising vertically spaced, parallel tiers of elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed transversely to the flow of the gaseous stream,
wherein each tier having parallel rows of collector channels which are staggered vertically from the rows in the next adjacent tier to deflect the flow of the gaseous stream from a lower tier through gaps between adjacent rows in a upper tier, to separate entrained liquid from the gaseous stream and permit the separated liquid to descend into channels of a lower tier for collection,
wherein each upper tier channel having at least one rigidly-mounted, horizontally-elongated flow deflector extending downward from the upper tier channel towards a lower tier channel below the deflector,
wherein the channels of the lower tier have foraminous extensions in the region between the upper tier and the lower tier, and the channels of an upper tier have downwardly extending deflectors attached to their bottom portions.
10. A separation system for de-entraining liquid particles from an upwardly flowing gaseous stream comprising:
a de-entrainment zone of vertically spaced parallel tiers of elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed transversely to the flow of the gaseous stream,
wherein each of the elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels having a bottom portion and a pair of sidewalls extending therefrom,
wherein each tier having parallel rows of collector channels which are staggered vertically from the rows in the next adjacent tier to deflect the flow of the gaseous stream from a lower tier through gaps between adjacent rows in an upper tier, to separate entrained liquid from the gaseous stream and permit the separated liquid to descend into channels of a lower tier for collection, with a plurality of horizontally-elongated flow deflectors extending parallel to each channel in the region between an upper tier and an adjacent lower tier, in a direction downwards towards a channel of the lower tier,
wherein each of the plurality of horizontally-elongated flow deflectors of an upper tier deflects at least a portion of the gaseous stream into a corresponding channel of the lower tier,
wherein each deflector extends below the bottom portion, wherein each of the elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels in the upper tier having a cap deflector interconnecting adjacent channels.
2. The distillation unit of
3. The distillation unit of
5. The distillation unit of
6. The distillation unit of
7. The distillation unit of
11. A separation system according to
12. A separation system according to
13. A separation system according to
14. A separation system according to
15. A separation system according to
16. The separation system according to
17. The separation system according to
18. The separation system according to
|
The present invention relates to liquid-gas phase separation techniques. In particular, it relates to de-entrainment of liquid particles suspended in an upwardly flowing gas stream, such as encountered in a distillation tower or the like.
Typically, distillation unit operations are conducted in countercurrent multi-tray towers in which the liquid flows across the trays and down the column by way of downcorners, while the gas passes upward through the trays, which may contain contact plates, bubble caps, sieves or similar contact devices. Mass transfer occurs in the liquid-gas mixtures near the bottom of each tray. Phase separation, necessary to secure overall countercurrent flow of gas and liquid, takes place by gravity in the spaces between the trays.
During the flow of the vapor and the liquid through the unit, liquid particles or droplets become entrained in the vapor phase of the upwardly flowing gaseous stream. The entrained liquid is difficult to separate from the flowing stream, and various techniques have been employed to provide phase separation. Various mechanisms may be exploited in the separation. Micro-droplets may be coalesced to form larger drops and liquid particles may be separated by centrifugal force, gravity, or impingement on solid surfaces. Demister screens and flow deflectors of varied design have proven effective in phase separation. Many of these devices, however, are expensive to fabricate and operate, and create excessive pressure drops.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,361,469 (Trutna) teaches co-current distillation components employing a multi-level array of rectangular horizontal channels (or U-shaped troughs) adapted for liquid separation, collection and distribution. The liquid collected in the channels is discharged to a downcorner that delivers the liquid to the tray of a lower stage. The de-entrainment devices may be installed above one or more distillation trays, as required by the particular application. In arrangements of this type, it is expected that most of the liquid swept up between one set of channels will continue to be entrained upward by the gas. The main liquid collection mechanism seems to be eddy flows past the upper edges of the channels. While this method exhibits a low pressure drop, the relative amount of recovered liquid particles is lower than desired. This deficiency is believed to be related to the relatively unrestricted flow path of the vapor stream with entrained particles as it passes through the array of channels.
According to the present invention, an improved separation system for de-entraining liquid particles from an upwardly flowing gaseous stream, passes a gaseous stream through a de-entrainment zone comprising multilevel tiers of elongated, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed in parallel rows transverse to the gaseous stream flow. The channels are arranged so that they are substantially horizontal, that is, horizontal or with only a slight inclination so that they can effectively function to collect the liquid. The tiers are spaced apart vertically with staggered parallel rows of collector channels to deflect the flow of the gaseous stream from a lower tier level through the open gaps between the channels and around the channels in an upper tier level, thereby permitting liquid particles to separate from the gaseous stream by gravity into lower level channels for collection and distribution via liquid downcorners. A rigid, elongated flow deflector extends parallel with each channel of an upper tier in the region between the tiers; this deflector extends in a downward direction from the channels of the upper tiers towards the channels of the next adjacent lower tier to deflect the gaseous stream flow and increase the efficiency of liquid particle collection in the collector channels. The deflector may be attached directly to the channels of the upper tier or, alternatively, to the channels of the lower tier to provide the desired deflection of gas flow and of separated liquid droplet flow.
The method for increasing the de-entrainment efficiency of the liquid particle from the gaseous stream passes the stream through a de-entrainment zone that includes multilevel tiers of elongated, substantially horizontal, U-shaped, liquid collector channels arrayed in vertically-spaced, parallel rows transverse to gaseous stream flow. The tiers are arranged with staggered parallel rows of collector channels to deflect the gaseous stream flow from a lower tier level around the channels in an upper tier level through open gaps between channels, so as to permit liquid particles to separate from the gaseous stream by gravity into lower level channels for collection and distribution. Flow deflectors extend parallel with each channel of the upper tiers in the region between the tiers; the deflectors extend in a downward direction from the upper channels towards the channels of the next adjacent lower tier to deflect the gaseous stream flow and increase the efficiency of liquid particle collection in the collector channels.
The invention is described below in more detail with reference to preferred forms of the invention, given by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like numerals are used to designate like parts throughout and in which:
Adjacent the lower end of downcorner passage 13, a liquid-gas contact tray plate 22 is disposed transversely across the column interior, and similar or identical plates 23, 24 are disposed transversely across the column interior at the lower ends of downcorner passages 15 and 16, respectively. Above each plate 22, 23, 24 there is disposed a gas-liquid separator zone, each separator 26, 27, 28 consisting of plural vertically spaced tiers or levels 31, 32, 33 of horizontally spaced parallel open-topped rectangular channels (referenced only in the lowest tier 28 only, for clarity).
Excessive vapor flows at the channel exit which can interfere with collection and delivery of liquid can also be prevented by providing a separate sealed downcorner for each channel row or stage. This alternative is advantageous where large variations in the liquid-gas ratio are encountered.
The fractionating column shown in
As indicated in
When using the normal open type downcorner, 13, 15, 16 and 17 of
In general, the proportion of the exit area of the channel outlet which is blocked by the skirt should, in principle, be greatest for the lowest tier, and decrease to zero for the highest tier. The optimal proportion of the outlet blocked on the lowest tier will increase to some degree as the number of tiers increases, since (due to the additional tiers) the pressure drop across the whole channel array (bottom to top) will increase, which tends to increase the pressure difference which tends to drive liquid and gas from the end of the lowest channel, under its skirt, and into the sealed downcorner zone. Thus, as the number of tiers increases, a proportionately smaller open area under the skirt is necessary or, at least, desirable, in order to drain the liquid from that channel. A design in which all the channels in the upper half of the tiers have no skirts, and all the channels in the lower half of the tiers have skirts blocking the upper half (50%) of the channel outlets, has been found to be satisfactory under a range of flow conditions. In a four-tiered construction, for example, the lower two tiers out of four might have skirts blocking the upper halves of the channel outlets while the uppermost two tiers might have channel outlets with no skirts. In the three-tiered separation zone of
Referring to
As shown in
Vapor stream 51 with entrained liquid flows upwards between the channels and impacts with the channel walls. The de-entrained liquid will collect on the bottom of the channel. Due to deflector configuration and position, the liquid will collect more readily around the deflector, and deposit more freely into the channel below. The deflector partially directs the flow of the gas/liquid current moving past the channel and, in addition, aids in the more complete collection of the liquid by increasing the accuracy of the droplet fall path, allowing a much greater percentage of the de-entrained liquid to fall directly into the channel below. The deflectors may be affixed to the bottom portion of the channel and in parallel to the line of the collector, preferably being oriented within 0–45° of vertical. The deflectors may have a variety of forms, such as serrated or perforated plates or curved surfaces.
As shown by vapor flow through the channels, the deflectors alter the path of the vapor flow. This has the added effect of maximizing the de-entrainment properties of the channel by inertial separation of the entrained liquid particles, which may allow for fewer overall channels to be used in a distillation tower. When the deflector is positioned at one edge of the channel, it may be advantageous to provide a slope in the bottom portion of the channel towards the deflector. This slope may be in addition to the lateral (transverse) sloping of the channels as depicted in
As shown in
The positioning of a deflector over an lower channel may in practice be off-center. This may be due to the predicted vapor flow movement pushing a droplet in a certain direction as it falls. Therefore, in some instances, the deflectors may be positioned such that they are not aligned over the channel below, but so that the dripping liquid will be blown into the appropriate position by the gas flow around and over the channel.
The deflectors in one form may be longitudinal strips extending continuously along the length of the channel. Alternatively, the deflectors may be added in selected locations along the channel length. This would further provide flexibility in directing vapor flow. The deflectors themselves may also have a modified shape that facilitates the collection of liquid or the vapor flow, such as tapering thickness.
Referring to
Vapor with entrained liquid flows upwards between the channels and impacts with the channel edges and deflectors. The liquid de-entrained at those points by inertial separation will collect on the bottom of the channel. The liquid will, however, collect more readily around the deflector, and deposit more freely into the channel below. The deflector therefore not only aids in better separation of the entrained liquid droplets from the greater extent of direction changes in the gas flow but it also promotes better collection of the liquid and deposition of the separated droplets by improving the falling accuracy of the droplets into the lower collection channels. This allows a greater amount of the de-entrained liquid to fall directly into a lower channel, than if the liquid were left to collect on its own on the bottom of the channels.
In the embodiment of
The top and bottom tiers of the array may have special features.
In order to provide a protected path to return the separated liquid from the channels downwards to a contact plate, a sealed downcorner configuration may be adopted, as shown in
De-entrainment apparatus is fabricated in five tiers according to the configuration of
The channels are closed at one end and collected liquid is withdrawn at an open end for distribution below. If an additional 30% area is assumed for downcorners, liquid feed zones or other hardware, a total device area of 51 in2 or 0.35 ft2 is arrived at. Flooding loads become 17 gpm/ft2 liquid, and 0.41 C-factor.
For the channels with the fitted deflectors, the flooding air rate is about 290 CFM at a liquid feed rate of 6 gpm. Here the flood point is defined as the gas velocity at which more than 6% of the liquid feed is carried up through the channel array without being captured (de-entrained). For the channel area alone, the flooding C-factor is 0.70 ft/s at 22 gpm/ft2. If the area is increased by 30% to account for downcorners, the estimated flooding C-factor becomes 0.54 ft/s at 17 gpm/ft2 liquid. This capacity is about double the capacity of conventional trays.
For comparison, a base case apparatus has identical channel configuration, except without deflector means and spacing between tiers is reduced to 0.4 inch to achieve comparable pressure drop across the de-entrainment zone. The flooding air rate is about 220 cfm at a liquid rate of 6 gpm. This flooding air rate is about 30% lower than seen with the improved deflector-equipped channel of Example 1.
De-entrainment testing employs air as the carrier gas and isoparaffin hydrocarbon liquid as the dispersed liquid phase. The results of comparative de-entrainment test are given in the following tables.
TABLE 1
Channels with Deflectors
Liquid feed
Gas Rate
Uncaptured Liquid
(gpm)
(cfm)
(% feed)
3.6
200
3.3
3.6
300
8.9
3.6
400
15.6
6
300
6.8
11
200
2.1
TABLE 2
Channels without Deflectors
Liquid feed
Gas Rate
Uncaptured Liquid
(gpm)
(cfm)
(% feed)
3.6
200
5.0
3.6
300
14.9
6
200
4.4
6
300
14.0
11
200
3.7
The improved channel/deflector design generally provides 20–30% less uncaptured liquid than the same configuration without deflectors. Besides being used in a CoFlo™ type of tray, such as the Trutna design, the improved channel arrays may enhance the capacity of conventional trays, operatively mounted immediately below at least a portion of the trays, i.e. at the top of the free area above the bubbling area. There they could capture entrained liquid, which would otherwise be carried upward to the tray above. These channels are less prone to flooding than conventional de-entrainment devices such as mesh or vane packs. Using only two or three tiers of channels may provide sufficient entrainment catch for such applications, with lower cost and pressure drop. A path of liquid to drain down out of the ends of the channels, such that the liquid is protected from the upwardly vapor, is preferred. One means of achieving this would be to seal the ends of the channels into a baffle, with this plate extending downward close to a wall of the vessel. A liquid head can build up in this protected volume. An opening, possibly incorporating a sealing device such as a seal pan, at the bottom of this protected zone allows liquid to drain out of this protected zone and preferably towards the downcorner leading to the tray below.
The improved channel arrays may be used in a wide variety of applications where de-entrainment of liquid from a vapor stream is desired. These improved channel arrays may be substituted for more conventional de-entrainment devices, such as mesh pads and vane packs. Preferred applications are those where the liquid load is greater than 1 gpm/ft2 in order to take advantage of the liquid-capturing capability of the channel array.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7448602, | Apr 22 2004 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | De-entrainment of liquid particles from gas |
7981201, | Dec 31 2008 | UOP LLC | De-entrainment device |
8020838, | Mar 31 2009 | UOP LLC | Contacting stages for co-current contacting apparatuses |
8052126, | Dec 31 2008 | UOP LLC | Liquid distribution in co-current contacting apparatuses |
8128743, | Nov 28 2005 | REA PLASTIK TECH GMBH | Gas scrubber with adapted drop separators |
9309175, | Apr 18 2013 | Honeywell International Inc | Reaction system and process to produce fluorinated organics |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1854340, | |||
4198215, | Jun 03 1977 | Fin deflector for separating liquid from a liquid/vapor mixture | |
4361469, | Feb 17 1981 | Process for using cocurrent contacting distillation columns | |
4381974, | Sep 08 1981 | Distillation columns | |
4496430, | Jan 22 1981 | Distillation Technology Limited | Mass transfer apparatus |
4582569, | Jan 22 1981 | Distillation Technology Limited | Mass transfer apparatus |
4759315, | Sep 02 1986 | CRANE CO , A CORP OF DE | Deaerator tray for a steam boiler feedwater heater system |
4981113, | May 04 1990 | Crane, Co. | Deaerator tray for a steam boiler feedwater heater system |
4995946, | Oct 10 1989 | Aristech Chemical Corporation | Method and apparatus for achieving balanced flow on multipass distillation trays |
5091060, | Sep 10 1990 | ConocoPhillips Company | Fractional distillation column and method for its use |
5660049, | Nov 13 1995 | Sorber with multiple cocurrent pressure equalized upflows | |
5683493, | Jul 19 1996 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Packing for separation columns and process of use |
5695548, | Nov 13 1995 | COFLO, LLC | Method and apparatus for producing co-current fluid contact |
5770020, | Dec 14 1990 | EBARA ENGINEERING SERVICE CO , LTD | Distillation apparatus |
5771710, | Mar 17 1995 | Gas Technology Institute | Thermosyphon cooled absorber for air cooled absorption cycles |
5798086, | May 10 1996 | Intensified locally cocurrent tray contactors | |
5837105, | Apr 07 1997 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Co-current contacting separation tray design and methods for using same |
6059934, | Apr 07 1997 | Mobil Oil Corporation | Co-current contacting separation tray design and methods for using same |
877460, | |||
20040107682, | |||
GB8208, | |||
GB166677, | |||
GB169458, | |||
WO2074404, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 22 2004 | ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 14 2004 | BUCHANAN, JOHN S | EXXONMOBIL RESEARCH & ENGINEERING CO | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014741 | /0506 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 22 2010 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 24 2014 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 13 2018 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 21 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 21 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 21 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 21 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 21 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 21 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 21 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 21 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 21 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 21 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 21 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 21 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |