Novel cut flower compositions which yield prompt, complete and homogeneous mixing when delivered in a permeable or semi-permeable container. No separate mixing is required, and the resulting solution if free of pH gradients. This result is attained by including in the composition one or more compounds that give rise to gaseous effervescence.
|
1. In a kit comprising a composition for cut flowers and a permeable or semi-permeable container, the improvement comprising the composition comprising components that yield gaseous decomposition products in an amount sufficient to cause the container to float after the container is placed into a vessel with water therein.
40. A cut flower food packet comprising:
an at least semi-permeable container having a permeability to particles of a size no greater than 400 μm, and
a composition for cut flowers in the container comprising components that yield gaseous decomposition products in an amount sufficient to cause the container to float after the container is placed into a vessel with water therein.
2. A cut flower food packet comprising:
an at least semi-permeable container having a permeability to particles of a size no greater than 400 μm, and
a composition for cut flowers in the container comprising one or more compounds that produce gas when contacted with water in an amount sufficient to cause the container to float after the container is placed into a vessel with water therein.
37. A cut flower food packet comprising:
an at least semi-permeable container having a permeability to particles of a size no greater than 400 μm, and
a composition for cut flowers in the container wherein 100 g of said composition comprise:
2 g to 10 of CaCO3, and
10 g to 60 g of citric acid said composition being provided in said container in an amount sufficient to cause the container to float due to a release of gas from said composition afier the container is placed into a vessel with water therein.
27. A method for maintaining the freshness of cut flowers comprising:
placing stems of cut flowers in a vase,
placing water in the vase,
placing a cut flower food packet in the vase which comprises an at least semi-permeable container having a permeability to particles of a size no greater than 400 μm, and a composition for cut flowers in the container comprising one or more compounds that produce gas when contacted with water in an amount sufficient to cause the container to float afier the container is placed into the vase with water therein, and then allowing the container to float to the surface of the water in the vase.
3. The packet of
4. The packet of
6. The packet of
9. The packet of
11. The packet of
16. The packet of
17. The packet of
18. The packet of
21. The packet of
25. An assembly of containers according to
26. An assembly comprising a waterproof or moisture-proof outer packaging and one or more packets according to
28. A method according to
29. A method according to
30. A method according to
31. A method according to
36. The packet of
38. The packet of
4 g to 8 g of CaCO3, and
20 g to 40 g of citric acid.
39. The packet of
20 g to 95 g of one or more carbohydrates,
0.2 g to 0.6 g of KA1(SO4)2 and 0.6 gto 1.4 g of MgSO4.
|
The present invention relates to formulations for maintaining the freshness of flowers and more particularly to kits comprising such formulations in permeable containers.
In order to maximize the fresh appearance of cut flowers, it is known that simply providing water is not sufficient, but rather some type of a cut flower food composition should be provided to the flower. In the past, the standard procedure has been to mix a quantity of powdered cut flower food composition with water to form a solution, with the solution then being provided to the container with the cut flowers. However, this requires the user to properly mix a correct amount of the cut flower food with a correct amount of water in order to achieve a solution with the correct concentration of cut flower food therein. Such a procedure provides mixed results, is time consuming and can be messy.
This problem has been ameliorated with the introduction of cut flower compositions dispensed in metered amounts in permeable containers, or “T-bags.” This administration form provides pre-measured quantities of a cut flower food composition packaged in permeable or semi-permeable materials such as a filter paper tea-bag. This assembly can be placed in the water of a container holding cut flowers, after which the water can enter the bag via the filter paper, so that the composition is dissolved, and then carries the composition out of the bag in the dissolved form. Measuring and mixing the proper amount of cut flower composition can therefore be dispensed with.
Unfortunately, however, such compositions in permeable containers suffer from the drawback that the ingredients tend to diffuse from the container in a slow and inhomogeneous fashion, thus yielding a poorly mixed solution. This disadvantage is particularly acute with regard to the pH of the solution. If well mixed, the solution should feature a homogeneous pH of 3 to 4.5, which is the optimal value for preserving the health of the fresh flower foliage. However, presumably due to the poor mixing, it has been observed that a pH gradient is established, and the top of the solution exhibits a pH of 5.5 to 6.5, whereas the bottom, where the cut stem absorbs nutrients and water, features a pH of 2 to 2.4. Such excessively low pH values are harmful to the flower foliage, resulting in a phytotoxic and unpleasant dehydrated appearance.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a food composition for cut flowers comprising one or more compounds that produce gas when contacted with water.
It is a further object of the present invention to provide a food composition for cut flowers, wherein 100 g of said composition comprise 0.5 g to 10 g of an effervescing agent, and 2.5 g to 60 g of an acid.
Also provided is a kit for maintaining the freshness of cut flowers comprising the food composition for cut flowers, 100 g of said composition comprising 0.5 g to 10 g of an effervescing agent, 2.5 g to 60 g of an acid, and a permeable or semi-permeable container.
Also provided is a solution for maintaining the freshness of flowers comprising for cut flowers, 100 g of said composition comprising 0.5 g to 10 g of an effervescing agent, 2.5 g to 60 g of an acid, and water.
Also provided is an implement for deodorizing air comprising a cut flower and an aqueous solution, wherein the solution comprises a composition, 100 g of said composition comprising 0.5 g to 10 g of an effervescing agent, and 2.5 g to 60 g of an acid.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method for maintaining the freshness of flowers comprising contacting a cut flower with an aqueous solution, wherein said aqueous solution comprises 0.05 g/L to 0.8 g/L of an effervescing agent, and 0.2 g/L to 3 g/L of an acid.
The present invention also provides a cut flower maintained fresh by contacting said cut flower with an aqueous solution, wherein said aqueous solution comprises 0.05 g/L to 0.8 g/L of an effervescing agent, and 0.2 g/L to 3 g/L of an acid.
Also provided is a composition for cut flowers comprising one more compounds selected from the group consisting of compounds comprising one or more azo-moieties, compounds comprising one or more diazo-moieties and chlathrates.
Another object of the invention is to provide an improved food composition for cut flowers, the improvement comprising the composition comprising components that yield gaseous decomposition products.
Furthermore, the present invention provides an improved kit comprising a food composition for cut flowers and a permeable or semi-permeable container, the improvement comprising the composition comprising components that yield gaseous decomposition products.
These and other objects of the invention, as well as the advantages over existing and prior art methods and compositions, which will be apparent in view of the following detailed specification, are accomplished in accordance with the following description and claims.
The present invention provides novel cut flower food compositions which yield prompt, complete and homogeneous mixing when delivered in a permeable or semi-permeable container. No separate mixing is required, and the resulting solution is free of pH gradients. This result is attained by including in the composition one or more compounds that give rise to gaseous effervescence. One possible explanation for the superior properties of such compositions is that the gas evolving from the effervescence accelerates the dissolution of the components of the mixture from the bag into the water, giving rise to a thoroughly mixed solution in comparatively little time.
In an embodiment of the invention, the effervescence of the composition is obtained by the inclusion in the mixture of components that produce gaseous effervescence upon contact with water. For example, carbonates or bicarbonates which give rise to CO2 gas when protonated, may be used. Example carbonates include Li2CO3, Na2CO3, K2CO3, (NH4)2CO3, MgCO3, CaCO3, and example bicarbonates include LiHCO3, NaHCO3 KHCO3 and NH4HCO3. Other compounds that give rise to gaseous decomposition products when dissolved and/or heated, such as compounds containing azo- or diazo-moieties, chlathrates, peroxides such as Li2O2, Na2O2, K2O2, MgO2 and peroxide-producing compounds such as borax and NaBO3 may also be employed.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention CaCO3 is the compound giving rise to effervescence. The quantity of CaCO3 is preferably 0.5% to 10% of the total weight of the composition, more preferably 2% to 5% of the total weight of the composition, and most preferably 2.8% to 4% of the total weight of the composition.
The effervescence of the composition may be increased by the inclusion of at least one acid to increase the protonation of the carbonates and bicarbonates and their decomposition into CO2. In a preferred embodiment, the acid is an acid, inorganic or organic such as formic, acetic, propionic, butanoic, pentanoic, hexanoic, malonic, tartaric, ascorbic and citric. In a more preferred embodiment, the acid is ascorbic, citric or a mixture thereof. In a yet more preferred embodiment, the acid is citric acid.
The composition also contains carbohydrate compounds customarily present in plant food preparations. Example carbohydrates include dextrose, levulose, fructose, galactose, mannose, sucrose, lactose and maltose. In a preferred embodiment, the carbohydrate is dextrose. The quantity of carbohydrates is preferably 20 g to 95 g for every 100 g of composition, more preferably 60 g to 80 g for every 100 g of composition, and most preferably 65 g to 75 g for every 100 g of composition.
Other plant nutrients may be present in the composition, for example sulfates. Preferred sulfates include KAlSO4 and MgSO4. Various additives may also be included, wherein such additives may be disinfectants, biocides and growth regulators. Example growth regulators include auxins, cytokinins and gibberellins. Conditioning agents for controlling the pH or the hardness of the water may also be part of the composition.
As shown in
Furthermore, it is advantageous if the container 24 is provided on the outside with an image 26, in particular obtained with using a printing technique. Filter paper is eminently suitable for an image to be applied thereto, for example, with the aid of a printing technique such as a flexographic printing technique. The image 26 may in this case be applied to the filter paper before the filter paper is formed into the container 24. In this way, it is possible to provide the container 24 with an advertising message. In particular, however, it is advantageous for the container 24 in this way to be provided with an indication of the composition contained therein. Such an indication may, for example, be a brand name, but may also be a list of the ingredients or active constituents. It is also possible to provide the container 24 with warnings in this way. In order to facilitate packaging, the containers 24 may be joined together to form one or more strands 28 as illustrated in
As shown in
(A) pH Profile of a Composition with CaCO3
The present example compares the pH distribution obtained with the below example composition (1) of the invention as opposed to those yielded by (2) EZ DOSES® with no effervescing agent and (3) CHRYSAL®, two commercially available formulations. The following preparations were applied to cut flowers:
Citric
Dextrose
Acid
KAlSO4
MgSO4
Additives
NaBO3.4H2O
CaCO3
3.727
1.338
0.021
0.048
0.050
0.071
0.20
grams
3727
1338
21
48
50
71
200
Ppm
(1) Preparation with 4 (w/w)% CaCO3, comprising the following ingredients:
(2) EZ DOSE® 5.0 g formula
(3) CHRYSAL T-BAG®
Packets for treatment (1) and (2) were made with 10 g of each formulation filled in filter paper bags. One packet was dropped into 2 L of standardized water. For treatment (3), one CHRYSAL T-BAG® packet was dropped in 1.5 L of standardized water (recommended rate). No mixing was done. An aliquot of the solution (about 30 ml) was pipetted out at different times from the top and the bottom of the solution and the pH was measured. Care was taken not to disturb the solution while pipetting.
The bags with composition (1) floated to the top within 10 seconds whereas bags with compositions (2) and (3) remained at the bottom for at least 30 min.
The pH of the solution after thorough mixing was 3.413, 3.324 and 3.297 for treatment (1), (2) and (3), respectively. The pH data show that the presence of CaCO3 significantly improves the mixing and maintains correct pH throughout the solution within 30 min. Without CaCO3, the pH does not equilibrate throughout the solution even after 24 hours.
(B) Treatment of Flowers with the Compositions of the Invention
Compositions with CaCO3 were compared in their effectiveness as cut flower food to traditional formulations. All compositions were tested on Dutch rose “Abrakadabra” and Purple Lisianthus. Dutch rose crops were obtained from Blumex (Miami, Fla.). Purple Lisianthus crops were obtained from Queens, (Miami, Fla.).
Rose heads were dipped in CURALAN® (10 ml/3.785 L) fungicide to inhibit Botrytis. All stems were re-cut under clean water with MICROBLOC® (60 ml/18.93 L) disinfectant. After processing the stems were randomly placed in 1 L vases of each flower food solution, according to experimental design. pH of each solution was measured. Vase life based on overall bloom life was determined by visual observation. Days to vase cloudiness were monitored. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA TM®. Each treatment was tested in three separate vases, three flowers to a vase.
The following treatments were applied to the flowers:
Treatment 1, EZ DOSE® composition without CaCO3: values are grams to make up 1 L of the solution
Citric
Dextrose
Acid
KAlSO4
MgSO4
Additives
NaBO3.4H2O
CaCO3
4.272
0.538
0.021
0.048
0.050
0.071
grams
4272
538
21
48
50
71
ppm
Treatment 2, EZ DOSE® composition with 8% CaCO3 and citric acid: values are grams to make up 1 L of the solution
Citric
Dextrose
Acid
KAlSO4
MgSO4
Additives
NaBO3.4H2O
CaCO3
2.248
2.162
0.021
0.048
0.050
0.071
0.40
grams
2248
2162
21
48
50
71
400
ppm
Treatment 3, EZ DOSE® composition with 4% CaCO3 and citric acid: values are grams to make up 1 L of the solution
Citric
Dextrose
Acid
KAlSO4
MgSO4
Additives
NaBO3.4H2O
CaCO3
3.272
1.338
0.021
0.048
0.050
0.071
0.20
grams
3272
1338
21
48
50
71
200
ppm
Treatment 4 (HF 200 powder): values are grams to make up 1 L of the solution
Citric
Dextrose
Acid
KAlSO4
MgSO4
CaSO4
Additives
4.40 g
0.47
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.08
Treatment 5: CHRYSAL T-BAG®
Treatment 6: CHRYSAL®
Treatment 7: CHRYSAL® 2
Treatment 8: FLORALIFE CLEAR PROFESSIONAL™
Treatment 9: FLORALIFE PROFESSIONAL®
Treatment 10: standardized water
EZ DOSE®, EZ DOSE® with 4% CaCO3, EZ DOSE® with 8% CaCO3, FLORALIFE CLEAR PROFESSIONAL™ and FLORALIFE PROFESSIONAL® increased the rose vase life compared to water. Lisianthus vase life was increased by all the treatments compared to water. Flowers treated in solutions of EZ DOSE® with 4% CaCO3 and of EZ DOSE® with 8% CaCO3 also exhibited a more complete, homogeneous opening. The foliage of such flowers also maintained a healthy and well-hydrated appearance.
TABLE 1
Vase life of flowers and days to vase cloudiness
Rose
Lisianthus
Days to vase
Treatment
vase life
vase life
cloudiness
EZ DOSE ®
10.5
9.1
10.3
EZ DOSE ® with 8% CaCO3
9.6
9.2
13.3
EZ DOSE ® with 4% CaCO3
9.8
10.1
11.3
Powder HF200 ™
9.2
9.2
6.7
CHRYSAL T-BAG ®
9.1
8.7
6.7
RIPPIT ®
9.3
8.0
6.3
CHRYSAL ® 2
9.3
9.6
8.0
FLORALIFE CLEAR
10.0
9.1
7.7
PROFESSIONAL ™
FLORALIFE
10.4
9.7
8.3
PROFESSIONAL ®
Standardized water
7.4
4.3
7.7
As set forth in Table 1, the performance of EZ DOSE® with CaCO3 in terms of flower vase life is comparable to that obtained by EZ DOSE® without CaCO3. Addition of CaCO3 up to 8% has therefore no significant negative effect on the vase life performance of the formulation.
As is apparent from the foregoing specification, the invention is susceptible of being embodied with various alterations and modifications which may differ particularly from those that have been described in the preceding specification. It should be understood that the inventor wishes to embody within the scope of the patent warranted hereon all such modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of his contribution to the art.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9006140, | Jul 28 2009 | Ecolab USA Inc | Floral preservative |
9096477, | Jan 06 2012 | URGO US, INC | Electrochemically treated nutrient solutions |
9126874, | Jul 09 2010 | URGO US, INC | Electrochemically treated nutrient solutions |
9451762, | Jul 28 2009 | Ecolab USA Inc | Floral preservative |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3874871, | |||
5112380, | Apr 10 1989 | KYOWA HAKKO KOGYO CO , LTD | Preservative for plants comprising alkenylphosphonic acids and, optionally, dipicolinic acid |
6083535, | Apr 12 1995 | Kureha Corporation | Effervescent granular preparation for keeping cut flower freshness |
6133237, | Mar 11 1992 | The Procter & Gamble Company | Psyllium drink mix compositions containing granulated base |
6289630, | Sep 05 1996 | Device to keep flowers fresh | |
6440900, | May 15 2001 | Engelhard Corporation | Method for extending the life of cut flowers |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Oct 01 2004 | Rohm and Haas Company | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jan 28 2005 | PIUS, SYLVESTER | FLORALIFE, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016595 | /0096 | |
Nov 23 2010 | FLORALIFE, INC | Smithers-Oasis Company | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026082 | /0930 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 07 2010 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jul 18 2014 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Dec 05 2014 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 05 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 05 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 05 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 05 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 05 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 05 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 05 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 05 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 05 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 05 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 05 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 05 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |