A high-temperature solution process for polymerizing ethylene is disclosed. The polymerization is performed in the presence of a preassembled bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst and an aluminum compound. Molecular modeling calculations predict that the bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst will have good activity and improved stability versus traditional Ziegler-Natta catalysts. This makes the catalyst especially suitable for solution polymerization processes, which require a thermally robust catalyst.

Patent
   7144964
Priority
Aug 19 2004
Filed
Aug 19 2004
Issued
Dec 05 2006
Expiry
Jan 08 2025
Extension
142 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
15
EXPIRED
1. A process which comprises polymerizing ethylene in solution at a temperature greater than 120° C. in the presence of an aluminum compound and a preassembled bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst having the general formula:
##STR00011##
wherein M′ is a group 4–6 transition metal different from V; each L is independently selected from the group consisting of halide, oxy, alkoxy, aryloxy, mercapto, siloxy, aluminoxy, borate, alkylamino, and C1–C30 hydrocarbyl; L′ is selected from the group consisting of halide, oxy, alkoxy, aryloxy, mercapto, siloxy, aluminoxy, borate, alkylamino, arylamino, and —OGO— wherein G is a linking group containing silicon, boron, aluminum, or two pi-bonded carbons; x satisfies the valence of M′ and y satisfies the valence of V.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein M′ is titanium.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein L is siloxy, aluminoxy, or borate.

The invention relates to a high-temperature solution process for polymerizing ethylene. The process uses a preassembled bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst.

Interest in catalysis continues to grow in the polyolefin industry. White much attention has been paid to single-site catalysts (metallocene and non-metallocene), Ziegler-Natta catalysts are a mainstay for polyolefin manufacture. Much research has been done since their inception and there are many types of Ziegler-Natta catalysts in use.

There are many known processes to polymerize olefins. Most are solution, slurry, or gas-phase processes. Solution processes are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,311,816, 4,769,428, 5,492,876, 5,589,555, 6,127,484, and 6,221,985. Solution processes operate at temperatures above the melting or solubilization temperature of the polymer.

While there are advantages of solution polymerizations, one disadvantage is that the high temperatures needed can cause catalyst decay. Because of this instability, the typical catalyst has poor activity and a high level is needed for good polymerization rates. Unfortunately, leaving high levels of residual catalyst in the polymer can adversely affect physical and mechanical properties, including ultraviolet stability. One approach is to deactivate or remove the catalyst, but this is costly.

One partially successful way to improve activity is to use mixed catalysts. For example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,218,266, 4,483,938, 4,739,022, and 5,492,876 use mixtures of vanadium and titanium-based Ziegler-Natta catalysts. While there is an improvement in activity, the levels of residual catalyst are too high for many end-use applications without deactivation or catalyst removal.

There have been some instances of linking three metals. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,324,736 and 4,387,199 describe tetravalent vanadium compounds containing two titanium atoms with general formula:

##STR00001##

The vanadate(IV) esters are said to have good solubility and improved stability versus vanadium alcoholates, making them suitable as catalysts for polymerizing olefins, dienes, and mixtures thereof. However, no polymerization information is given for these trimetallic esters. There is also no indication that a bimetallic catalyst could be used. A trimetallic catalyst requires three moles of transition metal per mole of active catalyst, thereby increasing the amount of transition metal in the polyolefin.

Trimetallic vanadates having the general formula:

##STR00002##
have been used for suspension polymerization of ethylene at 85° C. (see Herrmann et al. Makromol. Chem. 94 (1981) 91). Many catalyst systems are effective for suspension polymerizations but are ineffective for solution polymerizations.

A complex with two metals linked with an aliphatic diol is disclosed in German Patent DE 1,254,638. The complex is identified as a catalyst component, but the reference gives no polymerization information. Because there is no opportunity for conjugation through the aliphatic diol, it is unlikely that the catalyst would have special stability when used in a high-temperature polymerization.

Bimetallic compounds are known. For instance, Chem. Mater. 10 (1998) 620 discloses the synthesis of a vanadium-titanium alkoxide on a silica surface by means of sequential chemical vapor deposition, but there is no indication that the product might be used for polymerizing olefins. Bimetallic systems with an oxo linkage have been reported in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 2210 and in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996)10175. Again, neither of these indicates that the bimetallic compound is useful for polymerizing olefins.

There remains a need for a solution process with improved catalyst activity. If the catalyst activity is improved, the cost of the deactivation and removal steps can be decreased or even eliminated for some end-use applications.

The invention is a high-temperature solution process for polymerizing ethylene. The polymerization is performed in the presence of a preassembled bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst and an aluminum compound. Our molecular modeling calculations predict that the bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst will have good activity and improved stability versus traditional Ziegler-Natta catalysts. This makes the catalyst especially suitable for solution polymerization processes, which require a thermally robust catalyst.

The process of the invention comprises polymerizing ethylene in a solution process at a temperature greater than 120° C. in the presence of a Ziegler-Natta catalyst and an aluminum compound.

By “polymerizing ethylene,” we mean to include homopolymerizations of ethylene as well as copolymerizations of ethylene with a second olefin. Preferred second olefins are propylene, 1-butene, 1-hexene, 1-octene, ethylidene norbornene, and the like, and mixtures thereof.

Optionally, hydrogen is used in the polymerization to regulate the molecular weight. The amount of hydrogen needed depends upon the desired polyolefin molecular weight and melt flow. Generally, as the amount of hydrogen is increased, the polyolefin molecular weight decreases and the melt flow increases. For many applications, the polyolefin melt flow will be too low if the polymerization is done in the absence of hydrogen. The olefin polymerization process enables good control of molecular weight and melt flow properties by use of small amounts of hydrogen.

The solvent for the solution process dissolves the polyolefin and does not interfere with the olefin polymerization. Saturated aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons are suitable. Preferably, the solvent has a boiling point at atmospheric pressure in the range of about 30° C. to about 150° C. Solvents of lower boiling points are difficult to handle and can create high pressure in the reaction zone. Higher-boiling solvents can be difficult to remove at the end of the process. Suitable solvents include pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, toluene, xylene, and cyclohexane and mixtures of solvents such as Isopar®G solvent (product of ExxonMobil Corporation).

The polymerization is conducted at a temperature greater than 120° C., preferably from about 150° C. to about 330° C., more preferably from about 200° C. to about 300° C.

The polymerization is normally conducted under pressure. The pressure is preferably in the range of about 0.5 MPa to about 35 MPa, more preferably from about 5 MPa to about 25 MPa.

The process is conducted in the presence of a preassembled bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst and an aluminum compound. By “Ziegler-Natta” catalysts, we do not mean to include metallocene or single-site catalysts, which feature at least one polymerization-stable, anionic ligand that is aromatic, as in a cyclopentadienyl system. The Ziegler-Natta catalysts are bimetallic. They incorporate two different Group 4–6 transition metals. The metals are bridged by at least one oxygen atom (an “oxo” bridge). Preferably, the metals are titanium and vanadium.

By “preassembled”, we mean that the bimetallic Ziegler-Natta catalyst has been synthesized prior to addition to the polymerization reactor and is different from a mixture of two monometallic Ziegler-Natta catalysts. While a mixture of two monometallic catalysts may result in some in-situ formation of bimetallic species, mixing alone is an inefficient technique since many combinations are possible. Preassembling the bimetallic catalyst enables the improved catalyst activity.

Preferred Ziegler-Natta catalysts have the general formula:

##STR00003##
wherein M′ is a Group 4–6 transition metal; M″ is a Group 4–6 transition metal different from M′; each L is independently selected from the group consisting of halide, oxy, alkoxy, aryloxy, mercapto, siloxy, aluminoxy, borate, alkylamino, and C1–C30 hydrocarbyl; L′ is selected from the group consisting of halide, oxy, alkoxy, aryloxy, mercapto, siloxy, aluminoxy, borate, alkylamino, arylamino, and —OGO— wherein G is a linking group containing silicon, boron, aluminum, or two pi-bonded carbons; x satisfies the valence of M′ and y satisfies the valence of M″.

Preferably, M′ is titanium and M″ is vanadium. Preferably, L is chloride or C1–C4 hydrocarbyl.

Exemplary Ziegler-Natta catalysts useful for the process of the invention:

##STR00004##

The Ziegler-Natta catalysts useful in the process of the invention can be made by any of several techniques. One preferred technique involves an equimolar reaction of two compounds, each containing a different Group 4–6 transition metal. For instance, as reported in J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 (1995) 2210 and J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118 (1996) 10175:

##STR00005##

One preferred class of catalysts useful for the process of the invention is made by assembling the bimetallic catalyst on a support such as silica or alumina. For these catalysts, L′ is O-G-O, where G is a linking group containing silicon, boron, or aluminum. Exemplary Ziegler-Natta catalysts of this type, useful for the process of the invention:

##STR00006##

One convenient method for preparing bimetallic catalysts on a support is sequential chemical vapor deposition as described in Chem. Mater. 10 (1998) 620. In this technique, the support (silica, alumina, or the like) is treated with one Group 4–6 transition metal compound containing a labile ligand (e.g., VOCl3) followed by subsequent treatment with the second Group 4–6 transition metal compound (e.g., a titanium alkoxide).

The catalyst may deactivate by homolysis, which is an over-reduction at the active site. Having a second transition metal bonded in close proximity to the active site (i.e., the first transition metal) stabilizes the catalyst from over-reduction and the corresponding deactivation. When the second metal is linked with an oxygen atom, it is held close to the active site and can influence its stability. If the second metal is joined by a saturated linker such as ethylene glycol, the second metal cannot exert the same effect. Adding the two metal compounds separately—rather than preassembling a bimetallic compound—is inefficient because only a portion of the desired combination will be made. With regard to trimetallic compounds, the impact of having two transition metals close to the active site is unclear. While there may be some stabilization, having three metals makes the behavior of the catalyst system much more difficult to predict. The use of two transition metals for the stabilization of the active site metal when only one extra metal is needed results in unnecessarily high use of transition metal.

The process is conducted in the presence of a Ziegler-Natta catalyst and an aluminum compound. The aluminum compound is preferably a trialkylaluminum (triethylaluminum, triisobutylaluminum, trimethylaluminum), a dialkylaluminum halide (e.g. diethylaluminum chloride or diisobutylaluminum bromide), or an alkylaluminum dihalide (ethylaluminum dichloride, isopropylaluminum dichloride). Preferably, the aluminum compound is a trialkylaluminum or a dialkylaluminum chloride.

The optimum amount of aluminum compound needed relative to the amount of Ziegler-Natta catalyst depends on many factors, including the nature of the catalyst and aluminum compound, the purity of the solvent, the desired reaction rate, the reaction conditions, and other factors. Generally, however, the amount used will be within the range of about 0.01 to about 100 moles, preferably from about 0.1 to about 50 moles, and more preferably from about 1 to about 5 moles, of aluminum per mole of total transition metal.

Catalyst concentrations used for the olefin polymerization depend on many factors. Preferably, however, the concentration ranges from about 0.01 micromoles per liter to about 100 micromoles per liter. Polymerization times depend on the type of process, the catalyst concentration, and other factors. Generally, polymerizations are complete within several seconds to several hours.

The following examples merely illustrate the invention. Those skilled in the art will recognize many variations that are within the spirit of the invention and scope of the claims.

Silica is treated with vanadium oxychloride followed by titanium(IV) isopropoxide in similar manner as described in Chem. Mater. 10 (1998) 620 to afford a preassembled silica-supported bimetallic catalyst with vanadium and titanium linked together by an oxygen atom. The catalyst is expected to have a 1:1 molar ratio of vanadium to titanium and to be about 1.9% by weight vanadium. The proposed structure is:

##STR00007##
with the titanium supported on the silica and linked to the vanadium.

A two-liter, stainless-steel reactor is charged with 1-octene (5.0 g) and dry, oxygen-free Isopar® G solvent (1000 mL) and the reactor is heated to 170° C. The preassembled silica-supported bimetallic catalyst prepared above (0.05 mmol V) is combined with triethylaluminum (0.2 mmol), and the mixture is diluted to 20 mL with Isopar® G solvent. After 5 minutes of mixing, the catalyst mixture is loaded into an injector. The reactor is pressurized with 200 psig of ethylene, and then the catalyst solution is injected. The polymerization should start immediately, and ethylene is supplied on demand to maintain the reactor pressure at 200 psig. After 30 minutes, the polymerization is discontinued. The pressure is released and the mixture is cooled to 25° C. The expected product is polyethylene.

The procedure of U.S. Pat. No. 4,387,199 for making a trimetallic compound is modified to make the desired bimetallic compound. Thus, a solution of vanadium(IV) oxydiacetate (18.5 g, 0.1 mol) in 200 mL of o-xylene is stirred at room temperature and 34 g (0.1 mol) titanium(lV) butoxide is slowly added. The mixture is refluxed for 3 hours and then both butyl acetate and o-xylene are removed by distillation. The expected product is:

##STR00008##

A two-liter, stainless-steel reactor is charged with 1-octene (5.0 g) and dry, oxygen-free Isopar® G solvent (1000 mL) and the reactor is heated to 170° C. The preassembled bimetallic catalyst prepared above (0.05 mmol V) is combined with triethylaluminum (0.2 mmol), and the mixture is diluted to 20 mL with Isopar® G solvent. After 5 minutes of mixing, the catalyst mixture is loaded into an injector. The reactor is pressurized with 200 psig of ethylene, and then the catalyst solution is injected. The polymerization should start immediately, and ethylene is supplied on demand to maintain the reactor pressure at 200 psig. After 30 minutes, the polymerization is discontinued. The pressure is released and the mixture is cooled to 25° C. The expected product is polyethylene.

A solution polymerization is conducted as in Examples 2 and 3, but the catalyst used is a mixture of VOCl3 (0.05 mmol) and TiCl4 (0.05 mmol).

Based on molecular modeling calculations (described below), we predict that the catalysts used in Examples 1 and 2 will have higher activities than that of the catalyst of Comparative Example 3. In particular, the calculations predict that the catalysts used in Examples 1 and 2 will have a reduced rate of deactivation.

Evidence for the advantages of the process of the invention comes from molecular modeling studies. All calculations are performed with complete geometry optimization using the DFT method B3LYP with the LACVP** pseudopotential basis set as incorporated into the TITAN™ software package. We can consider several of the many likely possibilities for active sites that would be expected to arise from a mixture of VOCl3 and TiCl4 in combination with an alkyl aluminum compound. For each of these compounds, we calculate the energy of pi-complexation and the energy of ethylene insertion, the two steps that are necessary for polymerization to occur.

If the vanadium and titanium are connected with an oxygen atom, based upon modeling data, we expect that vanadium is the active site for the polymerization and that titanium serves to stabilize the vanadium.

##STR00009##

For Compound A, the energy of ethylene pi-complexation at vanadium is calculated to be −13 kcal/mol and the energy of ethylene insertion is 16 kcal/mol.

Calculations for Compound A versus Comparative Compounds B–E are shown in Table 1.

TABLE 1
Calculated Reaction Energies
##STR00010##
Pi-Complexation Insertion Homolysis
Compound (kcal/mol) (kcal/mol) (kcal/mol)
A -13 16 46
Comparative B -6 15 54
Comparative C -7 15 52
Comparative D -8 16 39
Comparative E 0 13 42

As the results in Table 1 demonstrate, each of the compounds has a similar reactivity for ethylene insertion, but Compound A has a much higher (as evidenced by the lower number) calculated reactivity toward ethylene complexation, a requisite first step in the polymerization.

The titanium species (Comparative Compounds B and C) are more stable to reduction as evidenced by the higher energy for homolysis. Over-reduction is a problem for vanadium-based catalysts, resulting in catalyst deactivation. The data show that Compound A should be less prone to over-reduction than the other vanadium-based Comparative Compounds D and E.

Thus, Compound A should be the most reactive catalyst, as evidenced by the lowest energy of complexation, and Compound A should have improved stability toward deactivation, as evidenced by the relatively high homolysis energy. This shows the advantage of using preassembled bimetallic catalysts in the solution polymerization process of the invention.

A simple mixture of VOCl3 and TiCl4 in the presence of an aluminum compound should result in unreacted monometallic species as well as many possible combinations of the metals including those shown in Compounds A–E. This complex mixture should not polymerize olefins as efficiently as the preassembled bimetallic catalyst A.

The preceding examples are meant only as illustrations. The following claims define the invention.

Nagy, Sandor, Mack, Mark P.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3218266,
4311816, Apr 27 1977 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Process for the preparation of polymers of α-olefins
4324736, Aug 24 1979 Dynamit Noble Aktiengesellschaft Tetravalent vanadium compounds which are soluble in organic solvents
4387199, Aug 24 1979 Dynamit Nobel Aktiengesellschaft Tetravalent vanadium compounds which are soluble in organic solvents
4483938, Jan 06 1981 E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, WILMINGTON, DE A DE CORP Polymerization of ethylene or ethylene/α olefin mixtures in the presence of improved titanium/vanadium catalyst
4739022, Jan 11 1986 STAMICARBON B.V. Catalyst system for high-temperature (co)-polymerization of ethylene
4769428, Oct 17 1985 DU PONT CANADA INC , MISSISSAUGA, ONTARIO, A CORP OF CANADA Solution process for the preparation of polymers of alpha-olefins
5492876, May 02 1990 NOVACOR CHEMICALS INTERNATIONAL SA Solution process for the preparation of polymers of α-olefins
5589555, Oct 03 1991 Novacor Chemicals (International) S.A. Control of a solution process for polymerization of ethylene
6127484, Apr 29 1999 Equistar Chemicals, LP Olefin polymerization process
6221985, Feb 01 1998 Nova Chemical (International) S.A Solution polymerization of ethylene
6426395, Aug 03 1998 Chisso Corporation; Hiroshi, Yamazaki μ-oxo-bis-metallocene complex compounds and catalysts using same for the polymerization of olefins as well as polymerization process
6528448, Apr 28 2000 Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP Polymerization catalyst compositions and processes to produce polymers and bimodal polymers
6723806, Jun 26 1998 DSM N V Metal complex containing one or more silsesquioxane ligands
DE1254638,
///////////////////////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Aug 19 2004Equistar Chemicals, L.P.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Aug 24 2004MACK, MARK P Equistar Chemicals, LPASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0159330842 pdf
Aug 30 2004NAGY, SANDOREquistar Chemicals, LPASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0159330842 pdf
Dec 20 2007BASELL NORTH AMERICA, INC CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007EQUISTAR CHEMICALS LPCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Lyondell Chemical CompanyCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007LYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L P CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Lyondell Petrochemical CompanyCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007National Distillers and Chemical CorporationCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Occidental Chemical CorporationCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Olin CorporationCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Lyondell Chemical CompanyCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007Basell Polyolefin GmbHCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007Quantum Chemical CorporationCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Basell Polyolefin GmbHCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Basell Polyolefine GmbHCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L P CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007Arco Chemical Technology, IncCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007Atlantic Richfield CompanyCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007BASELL NORTH AMERICA, INC CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Atlantic Richfield CompanyCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007Arco Chemical Technology, IncCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007EQUISTAR CHEMICALS, L P CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0213540708 pdf
Dec 20 2007Basell Polyolefine GmbHCITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Dec 20 2007ARCO CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY L P CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTGRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS0207040562 pdf
Mar 03 2009Equistar Chemicals, LPUBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0234490687 pdf
Mar 03 2009Equistar Chemicals, LPCITIBANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0226780860 pdf
Apr 30 2010Equistar Chemicals, LPCITIBANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0243970861 pdf
Apr 30 2010CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTEquistar Chemicals, LPRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0243290535 pdf
Apr 30 2010UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENTEquistar Chemicals, LPRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0243370186 pdf
Apr 30 2010CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTLYONDELL CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY, L P RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0243370705 pdf
Apr 30 2010Equistar Chemicals, LPDEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0243420443 pdf
Apr 30 2010EQUISTAR CHEMICALS LPUBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0243510001 pdf
Apr 30 2010Equistar Chemicals, LPWELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY AGREEMENT0244020655 pdf
Mar 04 2011UBS AG, Stamford BranchBANK OF AMERICA, N A APPOINTMENT OF SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT0321120863 pdf
Oct 16 2013BANK OF AMERICA, N A Equistar Chemicals, LPRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0321130730 pdf
Oct 17 2013DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICASEquistar Chemicals, LPRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0321130684 pdf
Oct 18 2013CITIBANK, N A Equistar Chemicals, LPRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0321130644 pdf
Oct 22 2013Wells Fargo Bank, National AssociationEquistar Chemicals, LPRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0321120786 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 07 2010M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jul 18 2014REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Dec 05 2014EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Dec 05 20094 years fee payment window open
Jun 05 20106 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 05 2010patent expiry (for year 4)
Dec 05 20122 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Dec 05 20138 years fee payment window open
Jun 05 20146 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 05 2014patent expiry (for year 8)
Dec 05 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Dec 05 201712 years fee payment window open
Jun 05 20186 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 05 2018patent expiry (for year 12)
Dec 05 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)