An energizable magnetic core for use in an inductor or a transformer includes a plurality of legs extending from the back yoke. The back yoke is formed in a loop arranged to provide a magnetic circuit. Each of the plurality of legs have a first end adjacent to the back yoke and a second end extending away from the back yoke. With the legs positioned upon the back yoke, a cover yoke is positioned adjacent to the second end of each of the plurality of legs. The cover yoke is also formed in a loop such that the cover loop is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit. Coils are positioned upon the legs of the energizable magnetic core. In one embodiment, amorphous metal may be used to construct the energizable magnetic core.
|
35. A transformer comprising:
a. a back yoke cormprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a back yoke inner face, the back yoke forming a loop such that the back yoke is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit;
b. a plurality of legs extending from the inner face of the back yoke in a direction substantially perpendicular to the inner face, each of the plurality of legs being comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a first end adjacent to the back yoke and a second end extending away from the back yoke;
c. a primary winding wound around at least one of the plurality of legs; and
d. a secondary winding wound around at least one of the plurality of legs, wherein a first current flowing through the primary winding induces a second current in the secondary winding,
wherein the energizable magnetic materials of the back yoke and the plurality of legs consist essentially of advanced, low loss materials.
48. A method of transferring electric energy from a first circuit to a second circuit comprising:
a. providing a transformer comprising
(i) a magnetic core comprising (a) a back yoke comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a back yoke inner face, the back yoke forming a loop such that the back yoke is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit, and (b) a plurality of legs extending from the inner face of the back yoke in a direction substantially perpendicular to the inner face, each of the plurality of legs being comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a first end adjacent to the back yoke and a second end extending away from the back yoke, wherein the energizable magnetic materials of the back yoke and the plurality of legs consist essentially of advanced, low loss materials;
(ii) providing a primary winding wound around the core; and
(iii) providing a secondary winding wound around the core; and
b. introducing a first current through the primary winding such that the first current flowing through primary winding induces a second current in the secondary winding.
1. An energizable magnetic core for an electromagnetic device comprising,
a. a back yoke comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a back yoke inner face, the back yoke forming a loop such that the back yoke is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit;
b. a plurality of legs extending from the inner face of the back yoke in a direction substantially perpendicular to the inner face, each of the plurality of legs being comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a first end adjacent to the back yoke and a second end extending away from the back yoke; and
c. a cover yoke adjacent to the second end of each of the plurality of legs, the cover yoke being comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a cover yoke inner face, and the cover yoke forming a loop such that the cover loop is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit,
wherein the back yoke and cover yoke are disposed with their respective inner faces in axially facing relationship and the energizable magnetic materials of the back yoke, the plurality of legs, and the cover yoke consist essentially of advanced, low loss materials.
22. A method of introducing inductance into an electrical circuit comprising:
a. providing an inductor comprising:
(i) a magnetic core comprising (a) a back yoke comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a back yoke inner face, the back yoke forming a loop such that the back yoke is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit, and (b) a plurality of legs extending from the inner face of the back yoke in a direction substantially perpendicular to the inner face, each of the plurality of legs being comprised of an energizable magnetic material and having a first end adjacent to the back yoke and a second end extending away from the back yoke, wherein the energizable magnetic materials of the back yoke and the plurality of legs consist essentially of advanced, low loss materials; and
(ii) providing at least one winding wound around the magnetic core;
b. placing the inductor in the electrical circuit for the purpose of adding inductance to the electrical circuit; and
c. introducing current into the at least one winding such that current flowing through the at least one winding adds inductance to the electrical circuit.
2. The magnetic core of
5. The magnetic core of
6. The magnetic core of
8. The magnetic core of
9. The magnetic core of
10. The magnetic core of
11. The magnetic core of
12. The magnetic core of
15. The magnetic core of
16. The magnetic core of
17. The magnetic core of
19. The magnetic core of
20. The magnetic core of
21. The magnetic core of
24. The method of
25. The method of
26. The method of
27. The method of
29. The method of
30. The method of
31. The method of
32. The method of
37. The transformer of
38. The transformer of
39. The transformer of
40. The transformer of
41. The transformer of
42. The transformer of
44. The transformer of
45. The transformer of
46. The transformer of
49. The method of
50. The method of
52. The method of
53. The method of
54. The method of
55. The method of
56. The method of
58. The method of
59. The method of
61. The method of
|
The field of the invention relates to a transformer and/or inductor core. The transformer and/or inductor core may be inexpensively manufactured and provides for low power losses. In addition, the core may be easily designed using magnetic materials that provide improved efficiencies at high frequencies
Typical prior art transformer and inductor cores include laminations of ferro-magnetic material assembled into loops that form magnetic circuits. These magnetic circuits may be completely closed or may include air-gaps. Many prior art transformer and inductor cores may be considered discrete rectangular pieces of laminated magnetic material that together form the overall shape of the core. For example, magnetic cores may take the form of an “E” shape formed from five discrete rectangular core components (with a piece to close the open gap) or a “U” shape formed from four discrete rectangular core components (with a piece to close the open gap). An alternative method to forming the magnetic core is to wind magnetic metal ribbon into a toroidal ring or oval. Coil windings are positioned upon the cores to complete the inductors or transformers. Examples of prior art transformer and inductor cores are shown in
In building transformer or inductor cores, all legs of the core (including any connecting portion that joins two coil wound legs) are typically of the same cross-sectional area. This allows the lines of magnetic flux to pass equally through the core with as little loss as possible. Unfortunately, this also means that the connecting portions of the core are large and add bulk to the core. It would therefore be advantageous to provide a transformer and/or inductor core arranged such that the overall size of the inductor or transformer could be reduced.
The advent and subsequent study of amorphous metals has caused many to believe that transformers and inductors made with amorphous metal magnetic cores have the potential to provide substantially higher efficiencies and power densities compared to conventional transformers and inductors. In particular, amorphous metals exhibit promising low-loss characteristics, leading many to believe that a magnetic core of amorphous metal would result in a transformer or inductor with increased efficiencies. However, it has proven difficult to effectively manufacture single and multi-phase amorphous metal transformer and inductor cores. In particular, amorphous metal tends to be brittle and difficult to work with and manipulate into desired shapes. Amorphous metal is manufactured in ribbon form, and the ribbon of amorphous metal is generally wound into toroidal rings of the ribbon during manufacture. Thus, the only practical shape that has been used when building transformers or inductors with amorphous metal cores is a ribbon wound oval shape. It would be advantageous to provide alternate shaped amorphous metal cores for transformers and inductors. It would be further advantageous to provide an inductor and/or transformer core assembled from amorphous metal such that the core has low loss characteristics and may be easily manufactured at a low cost.
An energizable magnetic core for use in an inductor or a transformer includes a plurality of legs extending from the back yoke. The back yoke is formed in a loop arranged to provide a magnetic circuit. In one embodiment, the back yoke is made from a ribbon wound amorphous metal material. Each of the plurality of legs have a first end adjacent to the back yoke and a second end extending away from the back yoke. The plurality of legs may be formed by removing material from the back yoke or by affixing material to the back yoke. For example, if the back yoke is amorphous metal, each of the legs may be formed by cutting into the back yoke and removing material to form the legs or affixing ribbon wound sections of amorphous metal to the back yoke to form the legs. With the legs positioned upon the back yoke, a cover yoke is positioned adjacent to the second end of each of the plurality of legs. The cover yoke is formed of an energizable magnetic material, such as amorphous metal. The cover yoke is also formed in a loop such that the cover loop is arranged to provide a magnetic circuit. Coils are positioned upon the legs of the energizable magnetic core. In one embodiment, the coils form windings for either a single phase or three phase inductor. In another embodiment, the coils form primary and secondary windings for either a single phase or multi-phase transformer.
The components of the energizable magnetic core may be formed of various materials other than amorphous metals. For example, the energizable magnetic core may be formed of traditional ferromagnetic materials or advanced materials other than amorphous metals. In addition, the magnetic core may take a number of different forms. For example, air gaps may be introduced in the back yoke, legs, cover yoke or and joint between the back yoke, cover yoke or legs to increase the magnetic reluctance in the core. Also, the back yoke, legs, and cover yoke may be formed from laminated strips of material, as ribbon wound material, or formed from a mold. In another disclosed embodiment, both the back yoke and the cover yoke include legs that extend from the yoke and the ends of the legs are positioned adjacent to each other to form the complete core.
Accordingly, an energizable magnetic core is disclosed for use with an inductor or a transformer. The energizable magnetic is core is smaller in size than traditional inductors and transformers and significant cost savings are achieved. Furthermore, advanced materials may be used in the construction of the magnetic core, and inductor or transformer is provided that is highly efficient with little power loss.
General Description of a Magnetic Core for Stationary Electro-Magnetic Devices
An energizable magnetic core is disclosed herein for use with stationary electromagnetic devices such as inductors and transformers. With reference to
The back yoke 22 is formed from an energizable soft magnetic material. For example, the back yoke may be made from a ferro-magnetic material or other material having a high magnetic permeability. In one embodiment, the back yoke is made of amorphous metal or other advanced magnetic materials (as defined subsequently herein). As discussed previously, amorphous metal material is generally produced as a ribbon of material wound in a toroid. The shape of the back yoke allows it to be conveniently formed from such amorphous metal in the form of a ribbon wound toroid. As shown in
With continued reference to
With reference now to
As a first example,
As a second example,
A third example of an electric device that may be provided using the magnetic core of
A fourth example of an electric device using the magnetic core of
It will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the magnetic core disclosed herein allows transformers and inductors to be produced at a size that is significantly smaller than prior art inductors and transformers. Generally, the cross-sectional area of the legs of a transformer or inductor core must be approximately the same as the cross-sectional area of the yoke connecting the legs. Using the analogy of a magnetic circuit, the reason for this is apparent for single phase device. In particular, for an efficient device, the magnetic flux retained by the core should be free to flow between the yoke to the legs with minimal reluctance. If the cross-sectional size of the yoke is significantly smaller than the cross-sectional size of the legs, significant reluctance will be experienced by the device, decreasing the efficiency of the device. The yokes of the magnetic core disclosed herein have significantly smaller cross-sectional areas than prior art yokes. The reason for this is that there are a plurality of relatively thin legs in each device that are joined by the yokes. Accordingly, the yokes of the magnetic core disclosed herein are proportional in size to the legs, and significantly smaller than prior art yokes. Accordingly, the size of the electric device disclosed herein is significantly smaller than prior art device without sacrificing efficiency.
For three-phase devices, the rationale for equivalent cross-sectional areas of legs and yokes may be explained slightly differently than the rationale provided above with respect to single phase devices. In a three phase device, the currents flowing in each phase winding are time-dependent and typically sinusoidal. Thus the magnetic lines of flux are time-dependent and similarly sinusoidal. In a typical prior art E-shaped core, there is a point in time when the winding current and flux in the center leg is at 100%. During this time, the flux in the external legs is each at 50%. At this point in time, both yokes connecting the legs could in fact be exactly one-half of the cross-section area of the center leg, as the yokes are only carrying fifty percent 50% of the leg flux in each of two opposite directions. However, when either of the external legs is at 100% winding current and flux, then the one-half cross sectional situation is not valid. This is because 100% of the flux flows in a single direction, with 50% of the flux flowing from the external to the center leg, and 50% flowing from the external to the far external leg. For this reason, in E-core devices, the yokes typically have exactly the same cross section as the legs. The electromagnetic core presented herein is different. In particular, because of the introduction of a loop backiron, there is not any point in time when 100% of the flux from any leg must travel in a single direction. Whenever any leg is selected for 100% flux, the flux will always travel in two opposite directions, to the two adjacent legs. Thus an advantage of the core disclosed herein is that the backiron and cover iron provide one-half cross-sectional area yokes when compared to typical prior art yokes.
As can be clearly seen in
Advanced Low-Loss Materials
The introduction of amorphous, nanocrystalline, optimized Si—Fe alloy, grain-oriented Fe-based, or non-grain-oriented Fe-based material into the core enables the device's frequency to be increased above 300 Hz with only a relatively small increase in core loss, as compared to the large increase exhibited in conventional devices using conventional magnetic core materials, such as Si—Fe alloys. The use of these low-loss materials in the magnetic core allows the development of the high-frequency electric devices capable of efficient operation and low losses.
Amorphous Metals
Amorphous metals are also known as metallic glasses and exist in many different compositions. Metallic glasses are formed from alloys that can be quickly quenched without crystallisation. Amorphous metal differs from other metals in that the material is very thin, i.e., 2 mils (two thousandths of an inch) or less in thickness and extremely brittle, thus making the material difficult to handle. A suitable amorphous material applicable to the present invention is Metglas® 2605SA1, sold by Metglas Solutions which is owned by Hitachi Metals America, Ltd. (see http://www.metglas.com/products/page5 1 2 4. htm for information on Metglas 2605SA1).
Amorphous metals have a number of recognized disadvantages relative to conventional Si—Fe alloys. The amorphous metals exhibit a lower saturation flux density than conventional Si—Fe alloys. The lower flux density yields an electric device with lower power densities (according to the conventional methods). Another disadvantage of amorphous metals is that they possess a lower coefficient of thermal transfer than for the conventional Si—Fe alloys. As the coefficient of thermal transfer determines how readily heat can be conducted to a cool location, a lower value of thermal coefficient could result in greater problems for conducting away waste heat (due to core losses) when cooling the electric device. Conventional Si—Fe alloys exhibit a lower coefficient of magnetostriction than amorphous metals. A material with a lower coefficient of magnetostriction undergoes smaller dimensional change under the influence of a magnet field, which in turn would result in a quieter device. Additionally, the amorphous metal is more difficult to process, i.e., be stamped, drilled, or welded, in a cost effective manner than is the case for conventional Si—Fe.
In spite of these disadvantages of amorphous materials, such amorphous metals can be used to successfully provide a electric device such as an inductor or transformer that operates at high frequencies (i.e., frequencies greater than about 300 Hz). This is accomplished through exploiting the advantageous qualities of the amorphous metals over the conventional Si—Fe alloys. The amorphous metals exhibit much lower hysteresis losses at high frequencies, which results in much lower core losses. The much lower electric conductivity of the amorphous metals, which results in lower amplitude of eddy currents, also leads to lower core losses. Additionally, the ribbon or sheet thickness for amorphous metals is typically much smaller than for conventional Si—Fe alloys, which also lowers the eddy currents and the core losses. Use of amorphous metals can successfully provide an electric device that operates at high frequencies through compensating for the disadvantages of the amorphous metals, while exploiting the advantageous qualities of the amorphous metal, such as the lower core loss.
Silicon-Iron Alloys
As used herein, conventional Si—Fe refers to silicon-iron alloys with a silicon content of about 3.5% or less of silicon by weight. The 3.5 weight percentage limit of silicon is imposed by the industry due to the poor metalworking material properties of Si—Fe alloys with higher silicon contents. The core losses of the conventional Si—Fe alloy grades resulting from operation at a magnetic field with frequencies greater than about 300 Hz are roughly ten times that of amorphous metal, causing the conventional Si—Fe material to heat to the point where a conventional device cannot be cooled by any acceptable means. However, some grades of silicon-iron alloys, herein referred to as optimized Si—Fe, would be directly applicable to producing a high-frequency device.
Optimized Si—Fe alloys are defined as silicon-iron alloy grades comprising greater than 3.5% of silicon by weight. The preferred optimized Si—Fe alloys comprises about 6.5%±1% of silicon by weight. The objective of the optimization process is to obtain an alloy with a silicon content that minimizes the core losses. These optimized Si—Fe alloy grades are characterized by core losses and magnetic saturation similar to those of amorphous metal. A disadvantage of optimized Si—Fe alloys is that they are somewhat brittle, and most conventional metalworking technologies have not proven feasible in manipulating the material. However, the brittleness and workability issues surrounding optimized Si—Fe are somewhat similar to those of amorphous metal, and the design methodology used for application of amorphous metal is very close to that used for optimized Si—Fe.
Conventional rolling techniques used to make conventional Si—Fe are generally not used to make optimized Si—Fe. However, other techniques known in the industry are used to make optimized Si—Fe. For example, milled optimized Si—Fe alloys can be made by milling techniques known in the art. However, it has not proven acceptable for mass production. Optimized Si—Fe alloys is also being manufactured through a proprietary vacuum vapor deposition process by JFE Steel Corporation, Japan. A composition of iron or silicon-iron is coated with silicon vapor under vacuum conditions, and the silicon is allowed to migrate into the material. The vacuum vapor deposition process is controlled to achieve the optimum content of 6.5% of Si by weight. While optimized Si—Fe alloy derived from vapor deposition is more brittle than conventional SiFe, it is less brittle than the milled optimized Si—Fe. The optimized Si—Fe is commercially available from JFE as “Super E-Core,” and is sold as a high-performance 6.5%-silicon magnetic steel sheet.
Nanocrystalline Metals
Nanocrystalline materials are polycrystalline materials with grain sizes up to about 100 nanometers. The attributes of nanocrystalline metals as compared to conventional course grained metals include increased strength and hardness, enhanced diffusivity, improved ductility and toughness, reduced density, reduced modulus, higher electrical resistance, increased specific heat, higher thermal expansion coefficients, lower thermal conductivity, superior soft magnetic properties. Preferably, the nanocrystalline metal is an iron-based material. However, the nanocrystalline metal could also be based on other ferromagnetic materials, such as cobalt or nickel. An exemplary nanocrystalline metal with low-loss properties is Hitachi's Finemet FT-3M. Another exemplary nanocrystalline metal with low-loss properties is Vitroperm 500 Z available from Vacuumschmelze GMBH & Co. of Germany.
Grain-oriented and Non-Grain-Oriented Metals
The grain-oriented Fe-based material results from mechanical processing of Fe-based material by methods known in the art. The grain-orientation refers to the physical alignment of the intrinsic material properties during the rolling processes to produce thinner and thinner metal, such that the grains of the resulting volume of material possess a preferential direction of magnetization. The magnetization of the grains and magnetic domains are oriented in the direction of the rolling process. This domain orientation allows the magnetic field to be more readily reversible in the direction of orientation, yielding lower core losses in that preferred direction. However, the core losses increase in the direction orthogonal to the preferred orientation, and could prove to be a disadvantage in electric device applications.
Non-grain-oriented Fe-based materials have no preferred direction of magnetic domain alignment. The non-grain-oriented Fe-based material is not amorphous, in that is possesses some amount of crystallinity. Presently available conventional silicon steel has some crystal structure, because it is cooled slowly, which results in some crystallisation, and then thinned. However, unlike grain-oriented Fe-based materials such as conventional silicon steel, the non-grain-oriented Fe-based material has a more isotropic magnetization. Preferably, the non-grain-oriented Fe-based materials applicable to the present invention would have thicknesses less than 5 mils.
Defining Advanced Low Loss Materials
The core loss of soft magnetic materials can generally be expressed by the following modified Steinmetz equation:
L=a·f·Bb+c·fd·Be, where
L is the loss in W/kg,
f is the frequency in KHz,
B is the magnetic flux density in peak Tesla,
and a, b, c, and d and e are all loss coefficients unique to the soft magnetic material.
Each of the above loss coefficients a, b, c, d and e, can generally be obtained from the manufacturer of a given soft magnetic material. As used herein, the term “advanced low loss materials” includes those materials characterized by a core loss less than “L” where L is given by the formula L=12·f·B1.5+30·f2.3·B2.3, where
L is the loss in W/kg,
f is the frequency in KHz, and
B is the magnetic flux density in peak Tesla.
TABLE 1
LOSS COEFFICIENTS
Isotropic
Powder,
Grain-oriented.
Hoeganes
Typical 26
0.014″ Orthosil
“Advanced
Somalloy 500,
gauge M19,
M6 29 gauge El
Materials”
Loss
+.05%
non-grain-
1/2, Thomas &
Defined Loss
Coeff
Kenolube
oriented
Skinner
Limit
A
40.27
11.39
38.13
12.00
B
2.15
1.62
2.37
1.50
C
141.24
112.43
14.19
30.00
D
1.15
1.72
3.66
2.30
E
1.46
2.01
2.14
2.30
Amorphous,
Vapor
Metglas
Deposited 6.5%
2605SA1,
Nanocrystalline,
NanoCrystalline,
Loss
Si, JFE Super
advertised
VAC Vitroperm
Hitachi Finemet
Coeff
E, 0.10 mm
literature
500 Z
FT-3M
A
10.77
0
0
0.00
B
1.85
0
0
0
C
7.83
6.5
0.84
1.05
D
1.93
1.51
1.5
1.15
E
1.85
1.74
1
2.32
Each of the above materials is a soft magnetic material comprised primarily of an iron based alloy. Each of the coefficients noted in the tables above are available from the manufacturers of the materials or may be derived from the material specifications available from the manufacturers of the materials, and the coefficients are generally included on the spec sheets for the materials. To this end, each manufacturer of soft magnetic materials will typically participate in industry standard ASTM testing procedures that produce the material specifications from which the coefficients for the Steinmetz equations may be derived.
As can be seen in
Manufacture of Electric Device
One method for manufacturing the electric device disclosed herein involves winding a ribbon of advanced low-loss material is into a large toroid to form the back yoke 22 of the core 20. These ribbons are typically 0.10 mm (0.004″) or less in thickness. The toroid wound from the ribbon has an inside diameter and an outer diameter when viewed in the axial direction. In one embodiment, the legs are positioned upon the back yoke by machining the back yoke with slots 23 to form a unitary magnetic core (discussed in further detail below). Unfortunately, this method involves some waste material, as material cut away from the toroid to form the slots is scrap. As discussed previously, another method for forming legs on the core is to position smaller toroidal (or other) shapes made from ribbons of advanced low loss material upon the inner face of the back yoke. Examples of such shapes are shown in
Use of advanced materials in construction of the magnetic core disclosed herein provides for lower core losses in the electric devices, particularly as the frequency of the device increases greater than 300 Hz. Amorphous metal has lower thermal conductivity than typical SiFe, making the cooling methodology for the disclosed device made from amorphous metal different than that used for most existing inductors and transformers. In particular, cooling will be easier, since core losses are lower, however the designer may choose to increase the percentage of ohmic losses in an optimization strategy.
As mentioned previously, the core may be comprised of advanced low loss material and is “unitary” in construction in one embodiment. As used herein, a core that is “unitary” in construction is one that is does not require the assembly of two or more subcomponents to complete the core. In addition, the unitary core disclosed herein is also a “uni-body” core. As used herein, the term “uni-body” (or “unibody”) refers to a core that is layered from a thin ribbon of soft magnetic material to form a base shape and material is then removed from the base shape to form the core (e.g., the base shape is slotted to form teeth on the core). Unfortunately, advanced low loss materials tend to be extremely brittle, and making a uni-body core has proven to be difficult. Nevertheless, several companies, including some manufacturers of advanced low loss materials, have manufactured such cores made of advanced low loss materials using various processes, such as wire electro-discharge machining, laser cutting, electrochemical grind, or conventional machining.
Although the cores described herein are uni-body cores of unitary construction, various types of non-unitary and non-uni-body cores are contemplated for use in the electric devices described herein. For example, a “uni-body” core is possible that is subsequently cut into segments, making the resulting core not “unitary”. Likewise, a “unitary” core may be formed by molding an advanced material into the form of a magnetic core, including any teeth, but because the core is not wound from a thin ribbon to form a base shape with subsequent removal of material from the base shape, the resulting core would not be “uni-body”.
An additional advantage to using advanced materials in the electric devices disclosed herein is that additional design choices are introduced. This is possible because when the devices are comprised of advanced materials, they have lower loss-per-mass associated with the changing magnetic flux. Accordingly substitution of advanced materials for the higher loss materials typically used in the prior art allows for the overall losses to be reduced. These loss units are in watts (W). All electric devices must transfer the waste heat generated by these losses to some other cooler region. Failure to do so results in catastrophic runaway temperature rise of the device. Although liquid cooling is possible, the overwhelming majority of these devices are cooled by air cooling. Furthermore, the overwhelming majority of these devices use the device surface area as the surface through which the transfer of heat takes place. These units are in area, i.e., cm2. A common figure of merit is the loss divided by surface area through which to dissipate this loss, e.g. W/cm2. Given these circumstances, there a number of possibilities that the designer of these devices can take advantage of, with the introduction of advanced material and the subsequent reduced loss-per-mass material. For example, suppose that an original device using higher loss materials has W/cm2 of 0.40, but introducing advanced material results in W/cm2 of 0.20. The designer then has at least the following design choices. A first design choice is to reduce the size of the device, and thus reduce the surface area until the W/cm2 returns to 0.40. With this choice, there is then an improvement by way of reduced cost and smaller package size, for the same performance. A second design choice is to allow an increase to the current flowing in the winding, thus increasing the ohmic and core losses, until the W/cm2 is 0.40. With this choice, the power capacity of the existing device is increased without adding cost and size. A third design choice is to accept the device at the new loss density of 0.20 W/cm2, and rate it to work in less thermally-forgiving environments. A fourth design choice would be to incorporate some combination of the first through the third choices.
Although the present invention has been described in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred versions thereof, other versions are possible. For example,
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10692650, | Sep 15 2017 | Fanuc Corporation | Three-phase transformer |
10741319, | Jul 12 2017 | Fanuc Corporation | Three-phase reactor |
11515082, | Apr 28 2017 | Method for producing electricity using inductive electromagnetic force of power generation coil | |
7755244, | May 11 2007 | DANFOSS POWER SOLUTIONS US COMPANY | Stator for permanent magnet electric motor using soft magnetic composites |
8832940, | Sep 19 2008 | The Boeing Company | Electromagnetic clamping device |
9021704, | Sep 19 2008 | The Boeing Company | Electromagnetic clamping method |
9849553, | Mar 12 2013 | Drilling safety system | |
9899135, | Nov 08 2012 | HITACHI INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS CO , LTD | Reactor device |
D864867, | Mar 23 2017 | Fanuc Corporation | Core for electromagnetic device |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4205288, | Oct 27 1978 | ABB POWER T&D COMPANY, INC , A DE CORP | Transformer with parallel magnetic circuits of unequal mean lengths and loss characteristics |
4345229, | Dec 06 1978 | General Electric Company | Amorphous metal ballasts and reactors |
4603314, | Oct 26 1982 | TDK Corporation | Inductor |
4940913, | Oct 12 1984 | General Electric Company | Core for a dynamoelectric machine |
5208503, | Apr 12 1991 | Energy-efficient ferromagnetic stator and core apparatus | |
5331304, | Sep 11 1992 | Cooper Power Systems, Inc. | Amorphous metal transformer core |
5617526, | Dec 13 1994 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Operating system provided notification area for displaying visual notifications from application programs |
5731649, | Dec 27 1996 | BERG AND BERG ENTERPRISES, LLC | Electric motor or generator |
6583530, | Feb 20 2001 | Composite stator structure having corresponding concave embedding receiving grooves and arc-shaped teeth surfaces | |
6583707, | Apr 25 2001 | Metglas, Inc | Apparatus and method for the manufacture of large transformers having laminated cores, particularly cores of annealed amorphous metal alloys |
6668444, | Apr 25 2001 | Metglas, Inc | Method for manufacturing a wound, multi-cored amorphous metal transformer core |
6784588, | Feb 03 2003 | Metglas, Inc | Low core loss amorphous metal magnetic components for electric motors |
6909352, | Nov 13 1998 | Merlex Corporation Pty Ltd. | Endless core for a multiphase transformer and a transformer incorporating same |
20010033216, | |||
20030020579, | |||
20030128094, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 23 2004 | HIRZEL, ANDREW D | LIGHT ENGINEERING, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015265 | /0810 | |
Apr 26 2004 | Light Engineering, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 21 2010 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Jul 25 2014 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Aug 28 2014 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
Aug 28 2014 | M2555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Small Entity. |
Jul 23 2018 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jan 14 2019 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 12 2009 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 12 2010 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 12 2010 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 12 2012 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 12 2013 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 12 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 12 2014 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 12 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 12 2017 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 12 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 12 2018 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 12 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |