The invention relates to a process for implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network comprising at least two independent elementary networks, each elementary network (RE1, RE2) comprising at least one source subscriber equipment and at least one destination subscriber equipment, connected to each other through at least one physical link through at least one switch, each equipment being connected to each of these elementary networks (RE1, RE2) in which a frame by frame redundancy is made on each elementary network.
|
1. Process for implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network comprising at least two independent elementary networks each comprising at least two switches, which are interconnected to each other and each connected to at least one subscriber equipment, each elementary network RE1, RE2 comprising at least one source subscriber equipment and at least one destination subscriber equipment, connected to each other through at least one physical link through at least two switches which are interconnected to each other and each connected to at least one subscriber equipment, each equipment comprising at least two physical interfaces each connected to one of the elementary networks, said process comprising, for each elementary network RE1 and RE2, the following steps:
in transmission of a frame by a source subscriber equipment:
addition of a numbering field in each transmitted frame, to thereby insert a frame number so that each frame is identifiable in time,
sending each said identifiable frame on the elementary networks RE1 and RE2,
in reception of a frame by a destination subscriber equipment:
storage of a received frame number that was added to a send frame,
acceptance of a frame only if its frame number has not already been received,
said acceptance taking place during a prescribed time window,
wherein a virtual link mechanism is used to limit the transfer time from a source equipment to one or more destination equipment, and wherein each switch uses a static configuration table to determine the virtual links that it is required to switch and the allowable number of packets for a virtual link.
2. Process according to
3. Process according to
addition of a numbering field in each transmitted frame, to insert a frame number,
send this frame on each of the elementary networks (RE1, RE2).
4. Process according to
storage of the received frame number
acceptance of this frame only if its number has not already been received.
5. Process according to
6. Process according to
8. Process according to
a transfer direction, the virtual link being single directional,
a source equipment (13),
one or several items of destination equipment (14),
a fixed passband,
a maximum guaranteed time for transfer of packets from a source equipment (13) to a destination equipment,
a fixed path on the network,
a unique identifier.
9. Process according to any one of the previous claims that is used for implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network in avionics.
10. Process according to
in transmission, for each frame received from a communication stack:
a numbering field is added so that a counter numbers the frame corresponding to each virtual link,
this frame is sent onto the elementary networks RE1 and RE2,
in reception, for each frame assigned to a virtual link:
the frame number is stored,
this frame is accepted if this number has not already been received, and if it is received it is destroyed.
11. Process according to
a transmission service, the role of which is to enable an application to access virtual links in transmission, wherein this service multiplexes virtual links towards a physical link through an Ethernet interface, and for each virtual link sends packets as a function of the passband allocated to the virtual link,
a reception service that decodes frames, checks their format and makes useful data available to applications.
12. Process according to
|
This application is claims priority of French application no. 01 14264 which was filed on Nov. 5, 2001, and was not published in English.
This invention relates to a process for implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network, particularly in avionics.
The Ethernet network, which is the reference in the world of communication networks, can be used to send data in digital form by packets or “frames”, where a frame is defined as being a set of data sent in a single step on the network.
In an Ethernet network, the data in each frame are not interpreted. The network carries the data without understanding their meaning. A frame is composed of two types of data, network data that are used to route the frame to its correct destination, and useful data which comprise the “useful load” in the frame.
An Ethernet network is composed of different equipment that is subscribed to the network, and connected to each other through a communication means formed of active equipment called switches, which perform three functions:
Operation of such a network is simple. Each network subscriber can send frames in digital form at any time towards one or several other subscribers. When a switch receives the frames, the “network information” data are analyzed to determine the destination equipment. The frames are then switched towards this equipment.
In the “switched full-duplex Ethernet type network” expression:
For example, this network may be a 100 Mbits/s switched full duplex type network on twisted pair; the term “twisted pair” means that connections between the equipment and the switches are composed of two pairs of cables, each pair being twisted; the term 100 Mbits/s simply means the transmission or reception speed of frames on the network.
The Ethernet technology imposes:
At the present time, in the civil aeronautics field, data exchanges between the various onboard computers are based on the use of the ARINC 429 aeronautical standard.
However, the switched full-duplex Ethernet network is frequently used in industry. The emergence of new communication technologies shows that this type of network is an open and standard solution (IEEE standard 802.3) with a considerable potential for development as a local network. But this type of solution does not provide any means of guaranteeing segregation and transfer performances (in terms of throughput, latency, etc.) necessary for avionics applications.
The purpose of this invention is to improve the availability of such a network, by providing means of protecting against the loss of a link or a switch, to enable its use in avionics.
In general, in a distributed control system, the communication system is made redundant so that each node in a set of nodes (equipment) can be controlled from one of these nodes, and so that these nodes can be connected so as to increase the load factor on the system and therefore its efficiency.
A European patent application EP-0 854 610 describes an Ethernet communication redundancy process between a set of nodes forming such a distributed control system. These nodes are connected to each other in duplex through communication lines in a first and a second Ethernet networks, that are independent from each other. At the transmission end, a first node transmits identical data on communication lines in the first and the second networks, a data identifier being added to the transmitted data. A second node at the reception end determines which of the identical data received from the first node through communication lines in the first and the second networks arrived first and uses it as the reception data. The second data are then rejected if they are identical to the first data.
Unlike the process described in this patent application which is applicable to data, the purpose of the invention is to make a process enabling frame by frame redundancy.
The invention relates to a process for implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network comprising at least two independent elementary networks, each comprising at least one source subscriber equipment and at least one destination subscriber equipment, connected to each other through at least one physical link and through at least one switch, each equipment being connected to each elementary network, in which a frame by frame redundancy is made on each elementary network.
This process comprises the following steps in transmission:
It includes the following steps on reception:
Advantageously, the step for acceptance of a frame takes place during a given time window.
In one advantageously embodiment, the virtual link concept is used, which is a conceptual view of a link from one source equipment to at least one destination equipment. A virtual link number is accepted in the numbering field of each transmitted frame. A virtual link is characterized by:
Advantageously, the process according to the invention can be used for the implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network in avionics.
This type of network redundancy, which may for example consist of doubling up the network, with each subscriber being connected to each of the two networks, one of the two packets being selected on reception, can increase the network availability; the network will continue to operate if it has one or several defective switches or links.
The invention can achieve redundancies of order 2 or more, independently of the communication stack and applications.
The invention relates to a process for the implementation of a redundant switched full-duplex Ethernet type communication network comprising at least 2 elementary networks each of which comprises at least one source subscriber equipment and at least one destination subscriber equipment connected to each other through at least one physical link. In the reminder of the description, we will consider two elementary networks RE1 and RE2 as a non-limitative example. This process makes a frame by frame redundancy on each of the elementary networks.
In transmission, it comprises the following steps:
In reception, it comprises the following steps:
Advantageously, the frame acceptance step only takes place during a given time window, so that only a limited memory size can be used, each frame number reappearing after a determined time.
Therefore, the process according to the invention only sends the first frame received from an elementary network, to the application considered, the other corresponding frames from other elementary networks being rejected.
In one advantageous embodiment, the process according to the invention uses the virtual link concept to limit the end to end transfer time, in other words source equipment towards one or several destination equipment.
This virtual link (VL) concept provides means of isolating data transfers between a source equipment 13 and destination equipment 14. A virtual link VL is seen as a “pipe” on the network, as illustrated in
A virtual link VL is characterized by:
A network subscriber may comprise several virtual links VL1, VL2, VL3, as shown in
When equipment 21 wants to send a packet to equipment 23, 24 and 25, it sends a packet on the virtual link VL1. When it wants to send a packet to equipment 22 and 23, it sends a packet on the virtual link VL2.
The difference between virtual links VL1 and VL2 is identified by the destination identifier in the packet. On the network, the virtual link to which a packet belongs is determined by the identifier of the virtual link in the packet.
A switch uses a static configuration table to determine the virtual links that it is required to switch, and the allowable number of packets for a virtual link.
The virtual link concept is a means of fixing communications between equipment by configuring routes and passbands allocated to the virtual links. Thus, the flow formed by a virtual link is sure to be not disturbed by other flows sharing the same physical links all along its route in the network.
Furthermore, the virtual link concept enables central flow management, to make sure that the sum of the passbands allocated to virtual links on the same physical link does not exceed the capacities of the technology of this physical link. In the above example, the sum of the passbands of virtual links VL1 and VL2 must be less than the transmission capacity of the physical link from equipment 21.
Therefore, a virtual link is a conceptual representation of a link from a transmitter equipment to one or several items of receiver equipment that have the following characteristics:
As illustrated in
In these transmission and reception services, the application may treat a virtual link like a queue.
Other protection services help to guard against some network failures:
As shown in
Therefore, in this embodiment, the steps in the process according to the invention used in the subscriber equipment and applied by a virtual link onto the network are such that:
Numbering is done by virtual link, and the same number can be used for two different virtual links.
The counter field can be small, and when the counter reaches its maximum value, frame numbering restarts from zero.
Portes, Dominique, Gambardella, Eddie, Lopez, Juan, Pasquier, Bruno, Almeida, Philippe, Saint Etienne, Jean-François
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10355993, | Nov 18 2016 | Mercury Mission Systems International S.A. | Safe network interface |
7505400, | Sep 22 2004 | Honeywell International Inc.; Honeywell International, Inc | Dual lane connection to dual redundant avionics networks |
8582426, | Nov 16 2004 | HITACHI ENERGY LTD | Reception of redundant and non-redundant frames |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4780869, | May 20 1987 | Allen-Bradley Company, Inc. | Local area network redundancy system |
5379278, | Jul 16 1993 | Honeywell Inc.; Honeywell INC | Method of automatic communications recovery |
6133846, | Oct 01 1996 | Honeywell Inc. | Low cost redundant communications system |
6188689, | Oct 04 1996 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Network node and method of frame transfer |
6282669, | Jan 16 1997 | YAMATAKE-HONEYWELL CO , LTD | Ethernet communication redundancy method |
6308282, | Nov 10 1998 | Honeywell INC | Apparatus and methods for providing fault tolerance of networks and network interface cards |
6766482, | Oct 31 2001 | RPX Corporation | Ethernet automatic protection switching |
20060107108, | |||
EP854610, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Nov 04 2002 | Airbus France | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Mar 28 2003 | SAINT ETIENNE, JEAN-FRANCOIS | Airbus France | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013945 | /0115 | |
Mar 28 2003 | LOPEZ, JUAN | Airbus France | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013945 | /0115 | |
Mar 28 2003 | PORTES, DOMINIQUE | Airbus France | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013945 | /0115 | |
Mar 28 2003 | GAMBARDELLA, EDDIE | Airbus France | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013945 | /0115 | |
Mar 28 2003 | PASQUIER, BRUNO | Airbus France | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013945 | /0115 | |
Mar 28 2003 | ALMEIDA, PHILIPPE | Airbus France | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 013945 | /0115 | |
Jun 30 2009 | Airbus France | Airbus Operations SAS | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026298 | /0269 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 08 2008 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 08 2011 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 01 2015 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 10 2019 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 18 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 18 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 18 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 18 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 18 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 18 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 18 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 18 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 18 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 18 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 18 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 18 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |