A process for hydrogenation of glycerol in which a feed comprising glycerol is contacted with a stream of a hydrogen-containing gas and subjected to hydrogenation in the vapour phase in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature of from about 160° C. to about 260° C., a pressure of from about 10 to about 30 bar, a hydrogen to glycerol ratio of from 400:1 to about 600:1 and a residence time of from about 0.01 to about 2.5 secs.

Patent
   7355083
Priority
Jul 15 2005
Filed
Jan 30 2007
Issued
Apr 08 2008
Expiry
Jun 30 2026
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
17
16
EXPIRED
1. A process for hydrogenation of glycerol in which a feed comprising glycerol is contacted with a stream of a hydrogen-containing gas and subjected to hydrogenation in the vapour phase in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature of from about 160° C. to about 260° C., a pressure of from about 10 to about 30 bar, a hydrogen to glycerol ratio of from 400:1 to about 600:1 and a residence time of from about 0.01 to about 2.5 hr−1.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the glycerol feed is vaporised into a stream of hydrogen-containing gas in a vaporiser before being passed to a hydrogenation reactor.
3. A process according to claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the catalyst is provided as a fixed bed located in the hydrogenation reactor.
4. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the catalyst is a reduced copper catalyst.
5. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the reaction temperature is from about 200° C. to about 240° C.
6. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the reaction temperature is from about 205° C. to about 220° C.
7. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the reaction pressure is from about 17 bar to about 23 bar.
8. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the reaction pressure is from about 20 bar.
9. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the residence time is from about 0.3 secs to about 1.5 secs.
10. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 8 wherein the residue time is about 0.5 secs.
11. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 10 wherein the hydrogen to glycerol ratio is from about 450:1 to about 550:1.
12. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 11 wherein the hydrogen to glycerol ratio is from about 500:1.
13. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein the process is selective for the formation of 1,2-propanediol.
14. A process according to claim 13 wherein the temperature is less than about 210° C.
15. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 12 wherein the process is selective for the formation of propanols.
16. A process according to claim 15 wherein the temperature is about 210° C. or more.

This application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. §365(c) of International (PCT) Application Serial No. PCT/GB2006/050181, filed Jun. 30, 2006, which claims priority from GB 0514593.3, filed Jul. 15, 2005, both of which are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety.

The present invention relates to a process for the hydrogenation of 1,2,3-propanetriol, also known as glycerol, in the vapour phase. More particularly it relates to the selective hydrogenation of glycerol in the vapour phase whereby alteration of the process conditions enables selection of 1,2-propanediol or propanols as the major product.

Glycerol is available in large quantities and it is anticipated that the supply of glycerol will increase as it is a by-product of processes which are becoming increasingly attractive since they are based on natural products such as oils and fats as starting materials. Examples of oils and fats include palm oil, rape seed oil, beef tallow and the like.

However, whilst glycerol is available in large quantities its present uses are limited in volume. It is therefore desirable to provide processes which enable the glycerol to be converted to useful materials. It will therefore be understood coupling downstream processes which use glycerol as a feedstock to processes which have glycerol as a by-product offers economic advantages. Thus processes to which a glycerol reactor could be coupled include bio-diesel units and fat splitters such as feed units to natural detergent plants and the like.

Although glycerol does not have uses to match its availability, it can be converted to 1,2-propanediol and 2-propanol which are valuable starting materials which have various applications. Various processes have been proposed for effecting the conversion.

In U.S. Pat. No. 5,426,249, which is incorporated herein by reference, there is described a process in which a gaseous stream of glycerol is dehydrated to acrolein. The acrolein is then condensed and hydrated to 3-hydroxypropionaldehyde which is then subjected to hydrogenation in the liquid phase. This multi-step process enables 1,2- and 1,3-propanediol to be obtained simultaneously.

U.S. Pat. No. 5,214,219, which is incorporated herein by reference, describes a process in which glycerol is converted to 1,2-propanediol and 1,2-ethanediol. In this process hydrogenation of the glycerol is carried out in the liquid phase in the presence of a copper/zinc catalyst and at a temperature of about 220° C.

An alternative processes for the liquid phase hydrogenation of glycerol is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,616,817, which is incorporated herein by reference. The process, which is directed to the production of 1,2-propanediol, requires the glycerol to have a water content of no more than 20% by weight. The hydrogenation is carried out in the presence of a catalyst comprising cobalt, copper, manganese and molybdenum.

Chaminand et al. Green Chem. 6, (2004) 359-361 describes a process in which the glycerol is hydrogenated in the liquid phase using a supported metal catalyst. At the process conditions of 180° C. and 85 bar the reaction rate is slow with only 20% conversion being achieved after 168 hours.

An alternative process is described in Desari et al., Applied Catalysis A281, (2005) 225-231 in which a copper/chrome catalyst is used for the liquid phase hydrogenation of glycerol. However, conversion was low with conversion rates of less than 30% being noted. It is suggested that this is due to the catalyst becoming deactivated and reactivation of the catalyst between tests was required.

DE4302464 and DE524101 describe in detail liquid phase processes for the production of 1,2-propanediol form glycerol. Whilst each makes passing reference to the possibility of the production being carried out in the vapour phase, neither document describes how the process can be efficiently and commercially carried out in the vapour phase to obtain high conversion and selectivity.

Whilst the processes described above offer means for obtaining desirable products from glycerol, they suffer from various disadvantages and drawbacks in terms of conversion, rate and/or economics and it is therefore desirable to provide alternative, and preferably improved, processes.

It has now been discovered that glycerol can be efficiently converted to the desired products by means of a hydrogenation reaction carried out in the vapour phase.

Thus according to one aspect of the present invention there is provided a process for hydrogenation of glycerol in which a feed comprising glycerol is contacted with a stream of a hydrogen-containing gas and subjected to hydrogenation in the vapour phase in the presence of a catalyst at a temperature of from about 160° C. to about 260° C., a pressure of from about 10 to about 30 bar, a hydrogen to glycerol ratio of from 400:1 to about 600:1 and a residence time of from about 0.01 to about 2.5 secs.

It is surprising that it has been possible to carry out the hydrogenation reaction in the vapour phase since it has generally been believed that this was not possible due to the high boiling point of the glycerol. The requirement to use high temperatures would be anticipated to cause the glycerol to coke leading to operating problems. The high operating temperatures would also be expected to adversely affect the catalyst.

However, it has now been found that using the conditions of a temperature of from about 160° C. to about 260° C., a pressure of from about 10 to about 30 bar, a hydrogen to glycerol ratio of from about 400:1 to about 600:1 and a residence time of from about 0.01 to about 2.5 secs enables the expected problems to be obviated. Carrying out the hydrogenation in the vapour phase offers various advantages over prior art liquid phase processes. In general, the residence time in the hydrogenation reactor is less. This is advantageous since short residence times lead to the formation of fewer by-products. The present invention also makes it possible to operate at lower pressures whilst maintaining high overall selectivities to the desired products.

Any suitable process is used for the hydrogenation reaction. In one arrangement, the glycerol is vaporised into a stream of hydrogen-containing gas in a vaporiser before being passed to a hydrogenation reactor. It will be understood that the vaporiser and the hydrogenation reactor may be separate or may be zones located in the same reactor. Where a vaporiser is present, the hydrogen rich vapour stream will generally be passed directly to the hydrogenation reactor.

The hydrogen-containing gas stream may be fed to the vaporiser where present or to the hydrogenation reactor at any suitable temperature.

The hydrogenation-containing gas may include minor amounts of one or more inert gases which may include nitrogen, carbon oxides, neon, argon and/or low molecular weight hydrocarbons such as methane, ethane, propane, n-butane and iso-butane. Ethanol and ethyl acetate may also be present.

The glycerol feed may be from any source. It may be pure glycerol or it may contain other components such as other organic compounds, water and/or impurities. For example, the glycerol feed may include one or more of water, alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, hydroxy propanone, butanols and the like and esters. Involatile components may also be present. Where such components are present, they may be removed from the reaction by means of a purge which is usually taken form the bottom of the vaporiser. The other components present will largely depend on the source of the glycerol. Since the process of the present invention may be carried out in the presence of such components there is no requirement to purify the glycerol prior to it being used as a feedstock. This offers significant advantages when the process of the present invention is to be coupled to plants in which glycerol is formed as a by-product. The process of the present invention will also be able to operate in the presence of a high salt and/or ash content.

Any suitable catalyst system may be used. In a preferred arrangement, the catalyst will be provided as a fixed bed located in the hydrogenation reactor. Any suitable catalyst may be used. In one arrangement, a reduced copper catalyst may be used. Examples include copper/alumina/manganese, copper chromite, copper silica, copper zinc alumina, copper zinc oxide, raney copper and the like. Reduced nickel or reduced cobalt containing catalysts may also be used. Precious metal catalysts such as those containing ruthenium, palladium, platinum, rhodium and/or iridium may be used. These may be supported on, for example, carbon, alumina and silica.

The process may be carried out at any suitable reaction conditions within the ranges of the present invention. Preferred temperatures are from about 200° C. to about 240° C. Temperatures of from about 205° C. to about 220° C. are particularly suitable. Pressures in the range of from about 17 bar to about 23 bar preferred with a pressure of 20 bar being particularly suitable. A residence time of from about 0.3 to about 1.5 secs may be used with a residence time of about 0.5 secs being particularly suitable.

The ratio of hydrogen to glycerol in the hydrogenation reactor feed is a function of temperature and the operating pressure. Preferred hydrogen to glycerol ratio is in the range of form about 450:1 to about 550:1. A ratio of about 500:1 is most preferred.

Surprisingly the process of the present invention offers excellent conversion. Conversions in excess of 95%, 98% and even in excess of 99% have been noted. However, in the event of incomplete conversion, separation of product from glycerol is readily achieved and unreacted glycerol may be recycled. By-products which may be formed, such as 1-hydroxy propanone, may be recycled for further reaction to the desired product.

Water will be produced in the reaction and at least a portion of the water produced may be recycled. Thus, other than at start up it is not generally necessary to add water to the glycerol to protect the catalyst which has been a feature of liquid phase reactions.

In a most preferred embodiment, the present invention relates to the selective hydrogenation of glycerol. In one arrangement, the invention selectively forms 1,2-propanediol and in an alternative arrangement the invention selectively forms propanols.

In general reaction temperatures of less than about 210° C. favour the formation of the 1,2-propanediol while those of about 210° C. and above favour the formation of propanols.

The present invention will now be described with reference to the following examples.

A 0.75″ reactor was charged with 75 g (50 mls) of catalyst DRD 9289 A, a copper based catalyst from Davy Process Technology Ltd, and reduced by conventional means. A feed of glycerol and methanol was fed to a heated vessel with the hydrogen at the reaction pressure and complete vapourisation of the feed mixture. The resultant gaseous stream was then passed to the reactor and contacted with the catalyst. Products removed from the reactor were condensed at 10° C. and were analysed on a Hewlett Packard HP3560 GC equipped with a micro TCD detector. The conditions for the various examples are set out in Table 1 and the results are set out in Table 2.

TABLE 1
Example No
1 2 3 4 5 6
Inlet Temperature ° C. 200 200 195 195 195 195
Pressure, bar 20 20 20 20 20 20
Residence Time, s 0.97 0.45 0.78 0.69 0.35 0.31
Hydrogen:Glycerol ratio 461 477 597 572 595 599
LHSV · Hr−1 0.287 0.625 0.303 0.356 0.676 0.755

TABLE 2
Example
Product Sel, Mol % 1 2 3 4 5 6
Ethanol 0.77 0.28 1.04 0.81 0.37 0.25
2-Propanol 1.59 0.59 1.87 1.45 0.67 0.47
1-Propanol 1.35 0.54 1.37 1.08 0.53 0.38
Hydroxypropanone 1.41 1.53 1.09 1.19 1.11 1.11
Ethylene Glycol 1.05 1.15 0.65 1.00 1.28 1.24
Propylene Glycol 93.28 95.65 93.71 94.13 95.98 96.51
Others 0.55 0.26 0.27 0.34 0.06 0.05
Conversion 100 97.63 100 100 99.94 99.54

Tuck, Michael William Marshall, Tilley, Simon Nicholas

Patent Priority Assignee Title
7977517, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
8017818, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
8053615, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
8188321, Apr 17 2007 Kao Corporation Process for producing hydrogenolysis products of polyhydric alcohols
8227646, Jul 26 2006 Johnson Matthey Davy Technologies Limited Process for the hydrogenation of glycerol to propylene glycol
8231857, Dec 21 2005 Virent, Inc Catalysts and methods for reforming oxygenated compounds
8324434, Mar 02 2008 Dow Global Technologies LLC Hydrogenation process
8350108, Aug 27 2008 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels from biomass
8362307, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
8367882, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
8455705, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
8476478, Apr 17 2007 Sensirion AG Process for producing hydrogenolysis products of polyhydric alcohols
8735635, Feb 25 2009 W. R. Grace & Co.-Conn. Process for making 1, 2-propane diol from hydrogenation of glycerol
8834587, Dec 20 2006 Virent, Inc. Method of producing gaseous products using a downflow reactor
8933281, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
9217114, Mar 08 2007 Virent, Inc. Synthesis of liquid fuels and chemicals from oxygenated hydrocarbons
9586879, Mar 15 2013 W. R. GRACE & CO-CONN. Process for the selective production of propanols by hydrogenation of glycerol
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4642394, Jul 16 1985 Celanese Corporation; CELANESE CORPORATION A CORP OF DE Production of propanediols
5214219, Jul 10 1991 Novamont S.p.A. Method of hydrogenating glycerol
5276181, Jul 10 1991 NOVAMONT S P A Catalytic method of hydrogenating glycerol
5354914, Jan 31 1992 NOVAOL S R L Method for producing lower polyhydric alcohols by hydrogenolysis of higher polyhydric alcohols
5426249, Nov 14 1992 Degussa AG Process for the simultaneous production of 1,2- and 1,3-propanediol
5616817, Nov 26 1994 BASF Aktiengesellschaft Preparation of 1,2-propanediol
6002054, Jun 20 1995 Kao Corporation Method for producing alcohol
6291725, Mar 03 2000 Battelle Memorial Institute, Pacific Northwest Laboratory Catalysts and process for hydrogenolysis of sugar alcohols to polyols
6841085, Oct 23 2001 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; Michigan State University Hydrogenolysis of 6-carbon sugars and other organic compounds
DE4302464,
DE524101,
EP510238,
EP72629,
EP1000003,
EP1292556,
WO2005095536,
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 30 2007Davy Process Technology Limited(assignment on the face of the patent)
Feb 01 2007TUCK, MICHAEL WILLIAM MARSHALLDavy Process Technology LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0189880080 pdf
Feb 27 2007TILLEY, SIMON NICHOLASDavy Process Technology LimitedASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0189880080 pdf
Sep 02 2013Davy Process Technology LimitedJohnson Matthey Davy Technologies LimitedCHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0441680964 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 20 2011M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 23 2015M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Nov 25 2019REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
May 11 2020EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 08 20114 years fee payment window open
Oct 08 20116 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 08 2012patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 08 20142 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 08 20158 years fee payment window open
Oct 08 20156 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 08 2016patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 08 20182 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 08 201912 years fee payment window open
Oct 08 20196 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 08 2020patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 08 20222 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)