In one embodiment, a method for printing includes selecting a nozzle for printing a pixel, determining a time since the nozzle was last actuated, and, if the time since the nozzle was last actuated exceeds a threshold time, then, before actuating the nozzle to print the pixel, actuating the nozzle a number of actuations corresponding to the time since the nozzle was last actuated.
|
1. A method for printing a pixel with a printer having nozzles through which a marking material may be projected on to a print medium when the nozzle is actuated, the method comprising:
selecting a nozzle for printing a pixel at a first pixel location;
determining a time since the nozzle was last actuated; and
if the time since the nozzle was last actuated exceeds a time within which the nozzle becomes clogged, then, before actuating the nozzle to print the pixel at the first pixel location, actuating the nozzle at pixel locations immediately preceding the first pixel location a number of actuations corresponding to the time since the nozzle was last actuated.
2. A processor readable medium having instructions for printing a pixel with a printer having nozzles through which a marking material may be projected on to a print medium when the nozzle is actuated, including instructions for:
selecting a nozzle for printing a pixel at a first pixel location;
determining a time since the nozzle was last actuated; and
if the time since the nozzle was last actuated exceeds a time within which the nozzle becomes clogged, then, before actuating the nozzle to print the pixel at the first pixel location, actuating the nozzle at pixel locations immediately preceding the first pixel location a number of actuations corresponding to the time since the nozzle was last actuated.
|
Inkjet printers eject drops of ink through very small openings, sometimes called nozzles, on to a print medium. Each drop forms a dot, sometimes called a pixel, on the media. Printed images are formed from many such pixels. Ink ejection nozzles that are not used frequently may become clogged as liquid evaporates from ink in the nozzles or from ink lying on the upstream side of the nozzles. Ink drops cannot be ejected through clogged nozzles. Hence, it is desirable to unclog a nozzle before using the nozzle to print a pixel.
The exemplary embodiments shown in the figures and described below illustrate but do not limit the invention. Other forms, details, and embodiments may be made and implemented. Hence, the following description should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined in the claims that follow the description.
Printhead 12 may include a series of stationary printheads that span the width of print media 22. Alternatively, printhead 12 may include a single printhead that scans back and forth on carriage 16 across the width of media 22. Other printhead configurations are possible. For example, for bar codes and other images printed on a comparatively narrow media strip 22, such as might be the case for printing bar code and other labels, printhead 12 may include a single stationary printhead. Carriage 16 positions printhead 12 relative to media 22 and media transport 18 positions media 22 relative to printhead 12. For a scanning type printhead 12, carriage 16 is a movable carriage that includes a drive mechanism to carry printhead 12 back and forth across media 22. A movable carriage 16, for example, may include a holder for printhead 12, a guide along which the holder moves, a drive motor, and a belt and pulley system that moves the holder along the guide. Media transport 18 advances print media 22 lengthwise past printhead 12. For a stationary printhead 12, media transport 18 may advance media 22 continuously past printhead 12. For a scanning printhead 12, media transport 18 may advance media 22 incrementally past printhead 12, stopping as each swath is printed and then advancing media 22 for printing the next swath.
Ink supply 14 supplies ink to printhead 12 through ink reservoir 24. Ink supply 14, reservoir 24 and printhead 12 may be housed together in a single print cartridge 26, as indicated by the dashed line in
Controller 20 receives print data from a computer or other host device 28 and processes that data into printer control information and image data. Controller 20 controls the movement of carriage 16 and media transport 18. As noted above, controller 20 is electrically connected to printhead 12 to energize the firing resistors to eject ink drops on to media 22. By coordinating the relative position of printhead 12 and media 22 with the ejection of ink drops, controller 20 produces the desired image on media 22 according to the print data received from host device 28.
Ink evaporates when exposed to air, causing ink in a nozzle to become more viscous. After enough ink has evaporated, the viscous ink forms a plug and the nozzle becomes clogged.
Referring to
The time it takes for a nozzle to clog and the relationship between the time since a nozzle was last actuated and the number of times the nozzle is actuated to unclog the nozzle may vary according to several factors, including the characteristics of the ink or other marking material, the characteristics of the nozzles and other elements in the printhead, the total number of times that the nozzle has been actuated in its life, and the printer operating conditions and environment. While it is expected that this relationship will often be established empirically, any suitable technique may be used, including modeling. The relationship may be varied during or between printing operations, at discrete intervals or continuously in real time, to maintain the desired print quality.
In one industrial inkjet printing application, for example, in which a full media width stationary printhead is used for high volume printing, an uncapped nozzle that is not fired for about ⅓ second will clog. In this example, therefore, time T2 in
The flow chart of
In one embodiment, the nozzle clearing actuations occur at the same frequency and with the same print medium transport speed for stationary printhead printers, or the same printhead scan speed for scanning printhead printers, as the pixel printing actuations. That is to say, the print resolution for the clearing actuations is the same as the print resolution for the pixel printing actuations. As used in this document, “print resolution” means the nominal center to center spacing of pixels, or pixel locations in the case of nozzle clearing actuations in which a pixel is not printed, measured in a direction across the width of an image. In inkjet printing, print resolution is often designated by the number of dots/pixels per inch (dpi). For example, a print resolution of 600 dpi represents a nominal center to center pixel spacing of 1/600 inch (42 microns) in which the center of each pixel or pixel location is approximately 1/600 inch from the center of an adjacent pixel or pixel location measured in a direction across the width of the image. Actuating nozzles at the same print resolution for both clog clearing and printing simplifies the printing process and allows the printer to operate at maximum production at all times by allowing maximum nozzle firing/actuating frequency along with maximum print media transport speed for stationary printhead printers or maximum scan speed for scanning printhead printers.
While it is expected that printer 10 (
Although the programming used to implement the methods described above will usually reside on printer controller 20 (
As noted at the beginning of this Description, the exemplary embodiments shown in the figures and described above illustrate but do not limit the invention. Other forms, details, and embodiments may be made and implemented. Therefore, the foregoing description should not be construed to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined in the following claims.
Little, Robert F., Espasa, Cesar Fernandez, Vinas, Santiago Garcia-Reyero
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7614723, | Jun 23 2005 | SCREEN HOLDINGS CO , LTD | Printing system, controller for printing apparatus, method of executing printing process, and program for flushing ejection |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5659342, | Sep 30 1994 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | On-page inkjet printhead spitting system |
5850236, | Apr 20 1995 | FUJI PHOTO FILM CO , LTD | Prefiring method for an ink-jet head and apparatus having the ink-jet head with the prefiring method |
6293646, | Jun 24 1999 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Ink-jet look-ahead servicing |
6575545, | Aug 31 2001 | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | Impact reduction of slew decap by multi-dotting |
EP1151868, | |||
EP799701, | |||
WO11192729, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 04 2005 | LITTLE, ROBERT F | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016221 | /0806 | |
Jan 04 2005 | VINAS, SANTIAGO GARCIA-REYERO | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016221 | /0806 | |
Jan 04 2005 | LITTLE, ROBERT F | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | CHANGE OF NAME #2 INVENTOR CORRECTION TO RECORDED ASSIGNMENT REEL FRAME 016221 0806 | 016780 | /0510 | |
Jan 04 2005 | VINAS, SANTIAGO GARCIA-REYERO | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | CHANGE OF NAME #2 INVENTOR CORRECTION TO RECORDED ASSIGNMENT REEL FRAME 016221 0806 | 016780 | /0510 | |
Jan 18 2005 | ESPASA, CESAR FERNANDO | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016221 | /0806 | |
Jan 18 2005 | ESPASA, CESAR FERNANDEZ | HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L P | CHANGE OF NAME #2 INVENTOR CORRECTION TO RECORDED ASSIGNMENT REEL FRAME 016221 0806 | 016780 | /0510 | |
Jan 24 2005 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 23 2011 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 29 2015 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 03 2019 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 22 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 22 2011 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 22 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 22 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 22 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 22 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 22 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 22 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 22 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 22 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 22 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 22 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |