A technique that improves image analysis efficiency by reducing the number of computations needed to detect constant regions. constant region detection according to the present techniques includes determining whether an image analysis window at a current position contains a constant region by analyzing a new line of pixels in the image analysis window if a pixel at a predetermined location in the image analysis window in the current position has a value equal to a pixel at the predetermined location from a previous position of the image analysis window. analyzing only the new line of pixels saves the computational time that would otherwise go into analyzing all of the pixels in the image analysis window.
|
12. A device, comprising:
an image buffer that holds an image frame; and
an image processor that detects a current constant region of the image frame by shifting an image analysis window to a current position so that the image analysis window includes a new line of pixels from the image frame in comparison to a previous position of the image analysis window, wherein an entire area of the image analysis window at the previous position is a previous constant region of pixels and wherein a constant region is defined as a region wherein all pixels contained therein are substantially similar in value; and the image processor determines whether an entire area of the image analysis window at the current position is the current constant region by analyzing a first pixel at a predetermined location in the image analysis window, wherein the analyzing comprises:
determining if the first pixel has a value equal to a value of a second pixel at the predetermined location defined relative to the boundary of the image analysis window when the image analysis window was at the previous position,
if the value of the first pixel has a value equal to the value of the second pixel, then analyzing only the new line of pixels to determine if the current constant region is present.
1. A method for detecting a constant region of an image frame, comprising:
shifting an image analysis window to a current position so that the image analysis window includes a new line of pixels from the image frame in comparison to a previous position of the image analysis window, wherein an entire area of the image analysis window at the previous position is a first constant region of pixels and wherein a constant region is defined as a region wherein all pixels contained therein are substantially similar in value;
determining whether the entire area of the image analysis window at the current position is a second constant region by analyzing a first pixel at a predetermined location in the image analysis window at the current position, the predetermined location being defined relative to a boundary of the image analysis window, wherein the analyzing comprises:
determining if the first pixel has a value equal to a value of a second pixel at the predetermined location relative to the boundary of the image analysis window when the image analysis window was at the previous position,
if the value of the first pixel has a value equal to the value of the second pixel, then analyzing only the new line of pixels to determine if the second constant region is present.
7. An image processing system comprising:
means for holding an image frame; and
means for 1) determining that an entire area of an image analysis window that included a plurality of pixels of the image frame at a previous position is a first constant region of pixels and wherein a constant region is defined as a region wherein all pixels contained therein are substantially similar in value and 2) detecting whether an entire area of the image analysis window at a current position is a second constant region of the image frame by analyzing a first pixel at a predetermined location in the image analysis window at the current position, predetermined location being defined relative to a boundary of the image analysis window, wherein the analyzing comprises:
determining whether the first pixel has a value equal to a value of a second pixel at the predetermined location in the image analysis window relative to the boundary of the image analysis window when the image analysis window was at the previous position;
if the value of the first pixel has a value equal to the value of the second pixel, then analyzing only a new line of pixels present in the image analysis window at the current position when compared with the image analysis window at the previous position to determine if the second constant region is present.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
8. The image processing system of
9. The image processing system of
10. The image processing system of
11. The image processing system of
13. The device of
14. The device of
15. The device of
16. The device of
17. The device of
|
A variety of devices may perform image analysis. For example, a computer system may analyze an image to detect features of interest in the image before sending the image to a printer. Similarly, a printer may analyze an image to detect features of interest in the image before printing the image. An example of a feature of interest in an image is a boundary between objects contained in the image.
An image undergoing analysis may be represented as a two-dimensional array of pixels each having a value. An image represented as a two-dimensional array of pixels may be referred to as an image frame. An image frame may be analyzed using an image analysis window that encompasses a portion of the image frame. An image analysis window may be used to divide image analysis into successive analyses of relatively small areas of an image frame.
An analysis of an image frame may include determining whether an image analysis window contains a constant region. A constant region may be defined as a region in which all of the pixels have substantially similar values according to an analysis metric, e.g. the values are substantially similar within a predetermined tolerance. A detection of a constant region may be used, for example, to rule out the constant region as containing features of interest
Prior methods for determining whether an image analysis window contains a constant region may include analyzing all of the pixels contained in the image analysis window. Unfortunately, analyzing all of the pixels contained in an image analysis window as the image analysis window is scanned over an image frame may be computationally intensive. For example, a 3 pixel by 3 pixel image analysis window applied to a 512 pixel wide image frame would include analyzing 9 pixels 512 times in just one 3 pixel high swath across the image frame. Large numbers of computations in detecting constant regions of an image frame slows the process of image analysis and may increase the cost of image analysis.
A technique is disclosed that improves image analysis efficiency by reducing the number of computations needed to detect constant regions. Constant region detection according to the present techniques includes determining whether an image analysis window at a current position contains a constant region by analyzing a new line of pixels in the image analysis window if a pixel at a predetermined location in the image analysis window in the current position has a value equal to a pixel at the predetermined location from a previous position of the image analysis window. Analyzing only the new line of pixels saves the computational time that would otherwise go into analyzing all of the pixels in the image analysis window.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the detailed description that follows.
The present invention is described with respect to particular exemplary embodiments thereof and reference is accordingly made to the drawings in which:
The image frame 20 includes an object 22. In this example, the values of the pixels in the object 22 are substantially similar, i.e. the object 22 has a substantially uniform color and intensity. In addition, the values of the pixels in the image frame 20 that are outside of the object 22 are substantially different from the pixels of the object 22.
The image processor 14 analyzes the image frame 20 using an image analysis window 24. The image analysis window 24 is relatively small in comparison to the image frame 20. For example, the image analysis window 24 may be 3 pixels by 3 pixels, or 5 pixels by 5 pixels, or 7 pixels by 7 pixels, etc., while the image frame 20 may be 800 pixels by 600 pixels, or 1024 pixels by 768 pixels, etc.
The image processor 14 analyzes the image frame 20 by scanning the image frame 20 using the image analysis window 24, which is defined by a rectangular or square boundary as shown in FIGS. 2 and 3A-B. In one embodiment, the image processor 14 scans the image frame 20 from top-left to bottom-right. For example, the image processor 14 may place the image analysis window 24 so that it overlaps the top left pixels of the image frame 20 and then shift the image analysis window 24 to the right one pixel at a time until the line of pixels at x=x1 is reached. The image processor 14 may then move the image analysis window 24 down by the height of the image analysis window 24 and to the left to x=1 and then scan across as before, etc.
Each time that the image processor 14 shifts the image analysis window 24 to include a new line of pixels of the image frame 20 it determines whether the image analysis window 24 at its current position contains a constant region of the image frame 20. If the image analysis window 24 at its previous position did not contain a constant region then the image processor 14 determines whether the image analysis window 24 at its current position contains a constant region by analyzing all of the pixels in the image analysis window 24 at its current position, e.g. using known techniques.
On the other hand, if the image analysis window 24 at its previous position did contain a constant region then the image processor 14 determines whether the image analysis window 24 at its current position contains a constant region using the following analysis that enables a reduction in computational load on the image processor 14. The image processor 14 detects a constant region by analyzing only the new line of pixels at the current position of the image analysis window 24 if a pixel at a predetermined location in the image analysis window 24 as determined relative to the boundary of the window 24 at its current position has a value equal to a value of a pixel in the predetermined location in the image analysis window 24 as determined relative to the boundary of the window 24 at its previous position. Only the pixels in the new line need to be analyzed under this condition because all of the other pixels in the image analysis window 24 in its current position are already known to be constant with respect to the pixel at the predetermined location because the image analysis window 24 at its previous position contained a constant region. The new line of pixels may be analyzed by comparing the values in the new line to the value at the predetermined location. If the value of the pixel at the predetermined location in the image analysis window 24 in its current position does not equal the value of the pixel at the predetermined location in the image analysis window 24 at its previous position then the image processor 14 analyzes all of the pixels in the image analysis window 24 to detect a constant region. In one embodiment, the predetermined location is a center pixel of the image analysis window 24.
At step 104, a constant region is detected by analyzing the new line of pixels. The new line of pixels may be analyzed using known techniques, e.g. by determining whether the values of the new line of pixels are within a predetermined tolerance.
At step 106, a constant region is detected by analyzing all of the pixels in the image analysis window at its current position. The pixels may be analyzed using known techniques, e.g. by determining whether the values of the pixels are within a predetermined tolerance.
The present techniques may be implemented in a wide variety of devices including computer systems, computing device, printers or other image generating devices, handheld and portable devices, etc. In addition, the present techniques may be implemented in a variety of image processing systems including image processing performed in software on computer systems as well as application-specific image processing systems.
The foregoing detailed description of the present invention is provided for the purposes of illustration and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise embodiment disclosed. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4703513, | Dec 31 1985 | The United States of America as represented by the Administrator of the | Neighborhood comparison operator |
4833722, | Jul 24 1987 | Eastman Kodak Company | Apparatus and methods for locating edges and document boundaries in video scan lines |
5077805, | May 07 1990 | Eastman Kodak Company | Hybrid feature-based and template matching optical character recognition system |
5487116, | May 25 1993 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Vehicle recognition apparatus |
5698833, | Apr 15 1996 | United Parcel Service of America, Inc. | Omnidirectional barcode locator |
6565003, | Dec 16 1998 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Method for locating and reading a two-dimensional barcode |
6591010, | Jul 29 1999 | GOOGLE LLC | System and method for image detection and qualification |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 16 2006 | SHOEN, JAY R | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES, LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017419 | /0342 | |
Feb 16 2006 | SHOEN, JAY R | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE RECEIVING PARTY INFORMATION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 017419 FRAME 0342 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF PATENT APPLICATION 11 368,656 TO AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | 017549 | /0233 | |
Mar 06 2006 | Marvell International Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 12 2006 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES GENERAL IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES IMAGING IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019036 | /0714 | |
Sep 20 2007 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES IMAGING IP SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Marvell International Technology Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021849 | /0047 | |
Dec 31 2019 | MARVELL INTERNATIONAL LTD | CAVIUM INTERNATIONAL | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 052918 | /0001 | |
Dec 31 2019 | CAVIUM INTERNATIONAL | MARVELL ASIA PTE, LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 053475 | /0001 | |
Dec 31 2019 | Marvell International Technology Ltd | MARVELL INTERNATIONAL LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051735 | /0882 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 23 2012 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 23 2016 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
May 11 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Oct 26 2020 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 23 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 23 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 23 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 23 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 23 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 23 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 23 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 23 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 23 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 23 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 23 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 23 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |