A restraint system for a vehicle having sensors for detecting a collision of the vehicle is described. The system has a control unit which analyzes the signals and, in the event of a recognized collision of the motor vehicle, transmits a first signal to a safety belt restraint, which then activates a belt tensioner using a predefined first restraint force, and subsequently transmits a second signal to a front airbag system, which then triggers an airbag. The system has a malfunction monitoring unit for one of the restraint devices such that the control unit transmits a third signal to a replacement restraint device in the event that a malfunction of the front airbag system is recognized by the malfunction monitoring unit.
|
16. A method of restraining an occupant of a vehicle, the method comprising the acts of:
recognizing in a control unit a vehicle collision;
upon recognizing the vehicle collision, generating a first signal in the control unit causing a first restraint device to restrain the occupant;
generating a second signal in the control unit causing a second restraint device to restrain the occupant, after a predefined time delay;
determining in a malfunction monitoring unit whether a failure of the second restraint system occurred, after recognition of the vehicle collision; and
if the failure occurred, generating a third signal in the control unit, after generation of the first and second signals, causing a replacement actuator of the first restraint device to restrain the occupant.
6. A vehicle occupant restraint system, comprising:
a control unit operatively connected to vehicle sensors for recognizing from vehicle sensors signals a collision of the vehicle;
a first restraint device for restraining the occupant in response to a first signal of the control unit, the first signal being generated when recognizing the collision;
a second restraint device for restraining the occupant in response to a second signal of the control unit, the second signal being generated after the first signal; and
a replacement actuator of the first restraint device for restraining the occupant in response to a third signal of the control unit, the third signal being generated, following transmission of the first and second signals, upon determining a failure of one of the first and second restraint devices after recognition of the collision.
1. A restraint system for a motor vehicle comprising:
sensors for detecting a collision of the motor vehicle;
a control unit for analyzing signals of the sensors, which, when recognizing a collision of the motor vehicle, transmits a first signal to a first restraint device comprising a safety belt restraint device that activates a belt tensioner using a predefined first restraint force, and subsequently transmits a second signal to a second restraint device comprising a front airbag system that triggers a front airbag; and
a malfunction monitoring unit for determining correct functioning of at least one of the restraint devices, wherein in the event a malfunction of the front airbag system is recognized by the malfunction monitoring unit after recognizing the collision, the control unit, following transmission of the first and second signals, transmits a third signal to the first restraint device that activates a replacement actuator.
2. The restraint system according to
3. The restraint system according to
4. The restraint system according to
5. The restraint system according
7. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
8. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
9. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
10. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
11. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
12. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
13. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
14. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
15. The vehicle occupant restraint system according to
17. The method according to
18. The method according to
19. The method according to
20. The method according to
|
This application is a continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2005/008926, filed Aug. 17, 2005, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119 to German Patent Application No. 10 2004 041 425.4 filed Aug. 27, 2004, the entire disclosures of which are herein expressly incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a restraint system for a motor vehicle having sensors for detecting a collision of the motor vehicle, and a control unit for analyzing signals of the sensors.
A restraint system for vehicles is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,326,146. In this restraint system, the data of sensors provided in the vehicle is analyzed by a control unit to determine a possible collision of the vehicle. If a collision is recognized, the control unit activates a first restraint device and, after a predefined time interval, a second restraint device. In addition, the activation or triggering of the first restraint device is monitored using a malfunction monitoring unit. If a malfunction is recognized upon the triggering of the first restraint device, the control unit immediately activates the second restraint device, i.e., without a time delay. In this restraint system, only a malfunction of the first restraint device is taken into consideration.
The present invention provides an improved restraint system which also considers a malfunction upon the triggering of the second restraint device.
The restraint system for a motor vehicle according to the present invention includes sensors for detecting a collision of the motor vehicle, and includes a control unit, which analyzes the sensor signals and transmits a first signal to a safety belt retention device as a first retention device in the event of a recognized collision of the motor vehicle, and activates a belt tensioner using a predefined first retention force. It then transmits a second signal to a front airbag system as a second retention device, which then triggers a front airbag after a predefined time interval following the activation of the belt tensioner. The system includes a malfunction monitoring unit for one of the retention devices, such that the control unit transmits a third signal to a replacement retention device, which then activates a replacement actuator, in the event a malfunction of the front airbag system is recognized by the malfunction monitoring unit.
An advantage of the restraint system according to the invention is that in the event of a malfunction of the front airbag system, the vehicle occupant(s) is (are) nonetheless well protected in the event of an accident. As is the case in already known restraint systems, signals of various sensors provided in the vehicle are analyzed with regard to an accident or a collision. The sensors may be acceleration sensors or pressure sensors, for example, which are installed in the vertical direction of the vehicle. The restraint system is implemented in such a way that upon recognition of a collision of the vehicle, the control unit first transmits a first signal to a safety belt restraint device, and subsequently transmits a second signal to the front airbag system. The safety belt restraint device activates an actuator for tensioning the belt, i.e., a belt tensioner, using a predefined first restraint force, upon transmission of the first signal. This is to prevent the driver from hitting the front airbag triggered by the second signal of the control unit unbraked, i.e., with too much energy. The restraint force is not to be too great, however, so that the vehicle occupant is not subject to unnecessary injuries from the restraint, such as broken ribs. Subsequently, the front airbag is triggered, according to the present invention, after a time delay relative to the belt tensioner. The chronological sequence for activating the actuators of the restraint devices is of special significance, in order to provide the occupants with optimal protection. The time delay is typically only very slight. According to the invention, it is unimportant whether the control device outputs the second signal with a delay with respect to the front airbag system activation, or the time delay is performed by the front airbag system itself.
The restraint system may also be implemented in such a way that the control unit triggers either only the first restraint device or, for example in the event of a stronger collision, both the first and second restraint devices as a function of the strength of the collision of the motor vehicle. In the restraint device according to the present invention, it is assumed that both the first and also the second restraint device can be activated or triggered.
If the front airbag does not trigger in response to a second signal transmitted by the control unit, and thus a malfunction of the front airbag system is recognized by the malfunction monitoring unit, the control unit transmits a third signal to a replacement restraint device, which then activates a replacement actuator. The occupant protection is thus further improved.
The replacement restraint device is advantageously the safety belt restraint device, to which the control unit transmits the third signal. Due to the third signal, the safety belt restraint device does not activate the belt tensioner using the predefined first restraint force, but rather using a predefined second restraint force, which is different from the first restraint force.
The second restraint force is advantageously greater than the first restraint force. This prevents the occupants from hitting the steering wheel or the dashboard in the event of a collision and a malfunction of the front airbag system, which could result in severe injuries to the occupants. The safety belt restraint device thus assumes the entire restraint or protective function.
The malfunction monitoring unit is advantageously implemented as an airbag triggering circuit monitoring unit, or as an interior sound pressure propagation monitoring unit using a microphone. Implementing the malfunction monitoring unit as an airbag triggering circuit monitoring unit offers the advantage that a malfunction may thus be recognized with a very high probability. If the malfunction monitoring unit is implemented as a sound pressure propagation monitoring unit, a microphone already provided in the vehicle, such as the microphone of the telephone system, may be used without incurring any additional costs.
The method for operating the restraint system according to the present invention will be discussed in the following description and figures, and will be explained in greater detail with reference to the drawings.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the invention when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
An exemplary restraint system of a motor vehicle according to the present invention, illustrated in
The condition shown
In contrast to
In other embodiments where the malfunction monitoring unit Ü is implemented as an interior sound pressure monitoring unit, a mode of operation of the front airbag system RE2 without malfunction may be recognized by a briefly increased sound pressure in the vehicle interior, directly after the triggering of the front airbag A2. If there is no briefly increased sound pressure, then a malfunction of the front airbag system RE2 may have occurred.
If it is established by the malfunction monitoring unit Ü that the front airbag A2 was not triggered upon the second signal re2 of the control unit SG, the malfunction monitoring unit Ü immediately transmits a signal “fs” to the control unit SG. The control unit SG then recognizes the malfunction of the front airbag system RE2 and, in response to the signal “fs” of the malfunction monitoring unit Ü, may immediately transmit a third signal re1f2 to a replacement restraint device RE1, which then activates a replacement actuator A1.
The replacement restraint device RE1 may advantageously include the safety belt restraint device RE1 already provided in the vehicle, which activates the belt tensioner A1 as the replacement actuator using a predefined second restraint force f2, in response to the third signal re1f2 of the control unit SG.
The second restraint force f2 may be greater than the first restraint force f1. This means that in this embodiment the belt tensioner A1 is first triggered using a low first restraint force f1 in the event of a collision of the motor vehicle. If there is a malfunction of the front airbag system RE2, according to the present invention, the belt tensioner A1 is subsequently activated using a second restraint force f2, greater than the first restraint force f1, since the safety belt restraint device RE1 is now the only functioning restraint device.
A simplified flowchart of an exemplary method for operating the restraint system according to the present invention is illustrated in
Furthermore, in a step 120, a second signal re2 is generated with a delay relative to the first signal re1f1, and is transmitted to a front airbag system (not shown), which then triggers a front airbag deployment in accordance with
In a next step 130, a malfunction monitoring unit (not shown) may be used to check with a query “fs” whether the front airbag system has triggered deployment of the front airbag, and/or whether the front airbag has deployed correctly. If there is no malfunction of the front airbag system, i.e., if fs=n, the restraint system is assumed to have triggered correctly. However, if there is a malfunction of the front airbag system, i.e., if fs=j, a third signal re1f2 is generated in a step 140, which is transmitted to the safety belt restraint device (not shown). This then activates the belt tensioner using a predefined second restraint force, in accordance with
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5164901, | Dec 05 1991 | TRW Vehicle Safety Systems Inc. | Method and apparatus for testing a vehicle occupant restraint system |
5326146, | Feb 26 1992 | Bosch Automotive Systems Corporation | Apparatus for controlling a plurality of vehicle safety devices |
5574427, | Mar 15 1996 | Autoliv Development AB | Method and apparatus for detecting air bag deployment |
5646454, | Sep 24 1994 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Electronic safety device for vehicle occupants including a memory device for storing fault conditions and associated control commands |
5796177, | May 19 1997 | Delphi Technologies, Inc | Firing circuit for multiple vehicle passenger restraint initiators |
6566765, | Mar 28 1998 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method for operating a restraint system connected to a bus line during faulty power supply |
20040163871, | |||
20040216939, | |||
20060108787, | |||
DE10153052, | |||
DE10230483, | |||
DE19813921, | |||
DE19822263, | |||
DE4447174, | |||
GB2372862, | |||
WO2092396, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 12 2007 | BAUR, RICHARD | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019232 | /0924 | |
Feb 26 2007 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 28 2007 | URBAHN, JAN | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019232 | /0924 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 15 2012 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 22 2016 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
May 18 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 02 2020 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 30 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 30 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 30 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 30 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 30 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 30 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 30 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 30 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 30 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 30 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 30 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 30 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |