Described is an integrated circuit that causes an input signal having one signal mode with a high state, a low state and a transition state to be dynamically level shifted to another signal mode with a respective high and low state, while minimizing a duration of the transition state of the output signal, wherein the one signal mode and the another signal mode have respectively different high and low state levels.
|
5. A circuit connected between a supply voltage and ground comprising:
an input node;
an output node; and
means for causing an input signal having one signal mode with a high state, a low state and a transition state to be dynamically level shifted to another signal mode with a respective high and low state, while minimizing a duration of the transition state of the output signal, wherein the one signal mode and the another signal mode have respectively different high and low state levels, wherein the means for causing the input signal to be dynamically shifted includes a comparator means for causing dynamic pull up and pull down of the output signal.
9. A method of operating upon an input signal that is transmitted along a single bus to result in an output signal comprising the steps of:
translating the input signal from one signal mode with a high state, a low state and a transition state to an output signal having another signal mode with a respective high and low state; and
minimizing a duration of the transition state of the output signal, wherein the one signal mode and the another signal mode have respectively different high and low state levels,
wherein the translating step includes maintaining the input signal at the one signal mode low state and the output signal at the another signal mode low state using an impedance control circuit, and
wherein translating the input signal includes controlling a pass transistor disposed on a signal path disposed between the input and output signals.
10. A method of operating upon an input signal that is transmitted along a single bus to result in an output signal comprising the steps of:
translating the input signal from one signal mode with a high state, a low state and a transition state to an output signal having another signal mode with a respective high and low state; and
minimizing a duration of the transition state of the output signal,
wherein the one signal mode and the another signal mode have respectively different high and low state levels,
wherein the translating step includes maintaining the input signal at the one signal mode low state while and the output signal at the another signal mode low state using an impedance control circuit, and
wherein minimizing the duration of the transition state includes controlling dynamic pull-up and pull-down of the output signal using a comparator to control pull-up and pull-down transistors.
1. A circuit connected between a supply voltage and ground that operates upon an input signal to generate an output signal comprising:
an input node;
an output node;
a signal path disposed between the input node and the output node, whereby the input node, the output node and the signal path are part of a common bus;
a pass transistor disposed within the signal path;
an impedance control circuit coupled to the input node and which controls the pass transistor;
a comparator that compares a voltage on the output node to a reference voltage, and produces a comparator output signal on a comparator output line;
a pull-down transistor coupled between the input node and the ground, and being controlled by the comparator output signal on the comparator output line;
a switch coupled to the supply voltage, and controlled by the comparator signal; and wherein:
the pass transistor, and the impedance control circuit together operate to cause the input signal having one signal mode with a high and a low state on the input node to be level shifted to the output signal having another signal mode with a respective high and low state on the output node; and
the comparator, the pull-down transistor and the switch together operate to cause dynamic pull-up and pull-down of the level shifted output signal.
2. The circuit according to
3. The circuit according to
6. The circuit according to
7. The circuit according to
11. The circuit according to
|
The present invention provides an apparatus and method that provides active pull-up and logic translation from one signal mode to another signal mode, and, more particularly from a CMOS signal mode to an I2C signal mode.
Circuits that provide level shifting from one signal mode to another signal mode are known. Circuits that provide an active pull-up function or an active pull-down function on an input signal are also known. An example of the latter type of circuit is the Linear TechnologyLTC1694, which provides active pull-up using a multiple discreet components.
Providing these functions together, however, has not been needed, and such is particularly true with respect to applications where these functions operate on the same signal on the same bus. It has been found, however, that providing these functions together on a single bus has advantages, and that there are even further advantages to providing such functions on a single integrated circuit chip that is designed and fabricated using conventional techniques.
The present invention provides for both logic translation and dynamic level shifting of a signal that is transmitted on a single bus.
In one embodiment there is an integrated circuit that causes an input signal having one signal mode with a high state, a low state and a transition state to be dynamically level shifted to another signal mode with a respective high and low state, while minimizing a duration of the transition state of the output signal, wherein the one signal mode and the another signal mode have respectively different high and low state levels.
In a particular embodiment, the one signal mode is a CMOS mode and the another signal mode is an I2C mode, and the input signal is a 100 kHz signal.
There is also described a method of operating upon an input signal that is transmitted along a single bus to result in an output signal. The method includes the steps of translating the input signal from one signal mode with a high state, a low state and a transition state to an output signal having another signal mode with a respective high and low state; and minimizing a duration of the transition state of the output signal, wherein the one signal mode and the another signal mode have respectively different high and low state levels.
These and other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying figures, wherein:
The invention comes, however, from recognition of certain requirements of the HDMI specification. In particular, the HDMI spec states that the bus capacitance cannot exceed 800 pF which is broken down as follows:
HDMI cables that meet the cable specification rating are typically very expensive due to their having such a low capacitance. Given this expense, the present invention allows for the use of less expensive HDMI cables where the capacitance exceeds 700 pF. The active pull-up circuit in the present invention, as described hereinafter, meets all I2C protocol risetimes for the “standard mode” speed of 100 kHz which HDMI uses for a cable having a capacitance of approximately 4000 pF. While this allows for cheaper cable, it also allow for longer cables (i.e. on the order of 100 feet (31 m) rather than 50 ft (15 m)
Further, the rise/fall times that the present invention meets are rise time of 1000 ns and fall time of 300 ns. The present invention, as described herein, implements a 1-to-1 effect on the rise time through the active pull-up as described herein. The fall time is controlled by the external field effect transistor LV ASIC while the “OUT” node signal is 5V-1.5V and then the present invention assists with pull-down when the “OUT” node signal is going from 1.5V-0V.
This circuit 100 has two overall functions. One overall function is to accelerate the LOW→HIGH transition on the “OUT” node for high capacitance loads. The other is to keep the “IN” node at a first signal mode “LOW” level while the “OUT” node is at a second signal mode “LOW” level, where second signal mode is different from the first signal mode.
With respect to the overall function of accelerating signal transition, an external resistor REXT is defined by the HDMI specification to provide first overall function, but unfortunately the value of REXT is too “large” to pull up the “OUT” node in the specified time for high capacitive loads. The REXT cannot be made smaller because the external field effect transistor LV ASIC (which also provide a buffer function) that is controlling the bus is only rated to sink X mA continuously, which is the current that will flow through Rext when “OUT” is at GND. Given this, the HDMI specification mandates that REXT have a MIN value of 1.5 kohms and MAX value of 2 kohms.
With respect to the second overall function of maintaining signal mode levels maintained, in particular for the HDMI embodiment this function can be described as keeping the “IN” node at a CMOS “LOW” level while the “OUT” node is an I2C “LOW” level. (I2C “LOW”=0-1.5V & CMOS “LOW”=0-0.8V)
A preferred embodiment of the present invention is described herein in the context of a 100 kHz signal that is described by the HDMI specification. How the present invention operates when the 100 kHz Signal is in the high state, and then in the low state, will be next described.
The active pull-up/logic translation circuit 100 is comprised of a signal mode transition circuit that is labeled “Impedance Control,” a pull-up circuit that is comprised of the comparator and associated components, and a pull-down circuit illustrated at pull-down transistor N1. The CBUS has an “IN” node and an “OUT” node, which bus has disposed thereon the pass transistor N2.
The Impedance Control circuit, in conjunction with RINT as described hereinafter, operates to keep the “IN” node at a first signal mode “LOW” level while the “OUT” node is at a second signal mode “LOW” level.
100 kHz Signal is “HIGH”. When the 100 kHz signal transitions to “HIGH” the field effect transistor LV ASIC has control of the entire bus CBUS (including both “IN” and “OUT” nodes that are disposed on the active pull-up/logic translation circuit 100). The field effect transistor LV ASIC pulls both sides of the bus “LOW,” which is typically less than 0.4V. During this state the Impedance Control block sets the gate of transistor N2 to just above a transistor threshold and the comparator leaves the switch SW to RACC in the “OFF” position. Although the gate of transistor N1 is “HIGH” the field effect transistor LV ASIC dominates the bus and causes pulling of the “IN” node to be “LOW,” as well as the “OUT” node.
100 kHz Signal is “LOW”. When the 100 kHz signal transitions to “LOW”, the field effect transistor LV ASIC releases the bus CBUS so that the internal resistor RINT now pulls up the “IN” node, but the gate of transistor NI is still “HIGH” so the “IN” node remains below 0.8V. At the same time, the external resistor REXT pulls up the “OUT” node. Also during this same time the “Impedance Control” circuit still has the gate of N2 just above a threshold, nearly isolating both sides of the bus. Then, as soon as the “OUT” node reaches 1.5V or 0.3VCC, the gate of transistor N1 goes “LOW” releasing the “IN” node to go “HIGH” via internal resistor RINT and the “Impedance Control” circuit returns control of transistor N2 to the LV Supply. Additionally, the comparator turns ON the switch to RACC and the “OUT” rises quickly.
Although the present invention has been particularly described with reference to embodiments thereof, it should be readily apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes, modifications and substitutes are intended within the form and details thereof, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it will be appreciated that in numerous instances some features of the invention will be employed without a corresponding use of other features. Further, those skilled in the art will understand that variations can be made in the number and arrangement of components illustrated in the above figures. It is intended that the scope of the appended claims include such changes and modifications.
Marak, Chadwick N., Dunnihoo, Jeffrey C
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4701720, | Apr 28 1986 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Capacitive feedback to boost amplifier slew rate |
5084637, | May 30 1989 | International Business Machines Corp. | Bidirectional level shifting interface circuit |
5517135, | Jul 26 1995 | XILINX, Inc.; Xilinx, Inc | Bidirectional tristate buffer with default input |
5656950, | Oct 26 1995 | XILINX, Inc.; Xilinx, Inc | Interconnect lines including tri-directional buffer circuits |
5689196, | Dec 02 1994 | FUTURE LINK SYSTEMS | Circuit comprising a data communication bus |
5877634, | Oct 15 1991 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | CMOS buffer with controlled slew rate |
6052325, | May 22 1998 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Method and apparatus for translating signals |
6323722, | Jul 29 1996 | HANGER SOLUTIONS, LLC | Apparatus for translating a voltage |
6329839, | Sep 04 1996 | Actel Corporation | Method and apparatus for universal program controlled bus architecture |
6492686, | Oct 02 1997 | SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Integrated circuit having buffering circuitry with slew rate control |
6597197, | Aug 27 1999 | Intel Corporation | I2C repeater with voltage translation |
6781415, | Nov 27 2001 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | Active voltage level bus switch (or pass gate) translator |
7161386, | Feb 12 2003 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Signal-level converter |
7239174, | Oct 21 2002 | CALLAHAN CELLULAR L L C ; YAKIMISHU CO LTD , LLC | Programmable interconnect structures |
20050162191, | |||
20060044011, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 15 2006 | California Micro Devices | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 17 2006 | MARAK, CHADWICK N | California Micro Devices | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018199 | /0870 | |
Aug 25 2006 | DUNNIHOO, JEFFREY C | California Micro Devices | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 018199 | /0870 | |
Feb 25 2010 | California Micro Devices Corporation | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024079 | /0097 | |
May 11 2010 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038631 | /0345 | |
Jul 29 2010 | California Micro Devices Corporation | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | MERGER SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024879 | /0135 | |
Apr 15 2016 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A ON ITS BEHALF AND ON BEHALF OF ITS PREDECESSOR IN INTEREST, CHASE MANHATTAN BANK | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038632 | /0074 | |
Apr 15 2016 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE INCORRECT PATENT NUMBER 5859768 AND TO RECITE COLLATERAL AGENT ROLE OF RECEIVING PARTY IN THE SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038620 FRAME 0087 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST | 039853 | /0001 | |
Apr 15 2016 | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038620 | /0087 | |
Jun 22 2023 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 038620, FRAME 0087 | 064070 | /0001 | |
Jun 22 2023 | DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 038620, FRAME 0087 | 064070 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 03 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Apr 24 2012 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 25 2016 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 21 2020 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 04 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 04 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 04 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 04 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 04 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 04 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 04 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 04 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 04 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 04 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 04 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 04 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |