By using high and low refractive index materials, a planarized reflective-refractive fresnel lens and a planarized refractive lenticular lens can be created. These flat screen components eliminate the need for an air-gap, thus reducing the screen thickness. Additionally, this allows for the screen to be manufactured on a roll-to-roll process that can significantly reduce the screen cost. By adding the capability of planarizing the elements, they can be combined in a final structure on a roll-to-roll process. Since the fresnel lens can be combined with the lenticular lens before exposure of the black stripe region, the exposure of the black stripe region can account for any deviation from true collimation or non-normal angle of incidence of the light path in the projection system design.
|
1. An optical element comprising:
a) a first substantially planar element having a first refractive index nx1, a first light-receiving surface, and a first light-transmitting surface;
b) a second substantially planar element having a second refractive index nx2, a second light-receiving surface, and a second light-transmitting surface;
wherein the first light-transmitting surface and the second light-receiving surface cooperatively form an array for redirecting light transmitted through the first and second elements, and nx1≠nx2.
16. A projection screen comprising a first substantially planar element having a first refractive index nx1, a first light-receiving surface, and a first light-transmitting surface, and a second substantially planar element having a second refractive index nx2, a second light-receiving surface, and a second light-transmitting surface, wherein the first light-transmitting surface and the second light-receiving surface cooperatively form an array for redirecting light transmitted through the first and second elements, and nx1<nx2; a fresnel lens element disposed on the first light-receiving surface; and a contrast enhancing region disposed on the second light-transmitting surface, wherein the contrast enhancing sub-regions are alternating light transmissive and light absorbing stripes.
23. A method of manufacturing an optical element comprising the steps of
a) providing a substantially planar light-transmitting element having a refractive index nxa, a first surface comprising an array for redirecting light, and a second, substantially smooth, surface;
b) providing a second substantially planar light-transmitting element having a refractive index nxb, a third surface comprising an array for redirecting light which cooperates in intimate contact with the first surface, and a fourth, substantially smooth, surface; and
c) providing a contrast enhancing region optically coupled to the second or fourth, substantially smooth, surface;
wherein at least one of the first or second light-transmitting elements have dispersed therein light scattering particles, and nxa<nxb.
2. The optical element of
5. The optical element of
6. The optical element of
7. The optical element of
8. The optical element of
9. The optical element of
10. The optical element of
11. The optical element of
12. The optical element of
13. The optical element of
17. The projection screen of
18. The projection screen of
19. The projection screen of
20. The projection screen of
21. The projection screen of
25. The method of
26. The method of
27. The method of
28. The method of
|
This application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application Nos. 60/609,437, filed on Sep. 13, 2004, the entire contents of which is incorporated herein by reference. Related applications are Ser. Nos. 11/197,246 and 11/200,592, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The invention generally relates to imaging screen elements, an optical path corrected imaging screen and methods of manufacture.
Screen components in projection TVs need to be reduced in thickness, to reduce total screen costs and create a thinner form factor, i.e., reduce bulk. Current configurations provide air gaps in-between screen components that can accumulate dirt or dust, materials that degrade image quality. The air gap also increases the cost of manufacturing, and the thickness of the system.
The traditional air gap used for Fresnel lenses used in projection TVs does not allow for lamination or combination of the Fresnel lens and other components in the screen. For example, Shikama has described a hybrid reflection-refraction Fresnel lens/screen in SID Proceedings 2002, p. 1252. While offering an improvement by lowering the F/# achievable with a Fresnel lens, this screen is described as using an air gap. Traditional Fresnel lenses are described in Projection Displays, Stupp and Brennesholtz, (Wiley and Sons 1999) wherein air gaps are shown.
The lenticular lens also uses an air gap to achieve the desired refraction and increased screen contrast. Improvements in lenticular lens technology include using aspheric lens shapes to improve the screen contrast by increasing the area of the black stripe region while maintaining throughput. However, this technology is also described as using an air gap, increasing the complexity of manufacturing, and the overall screen thickness.
Screen contrast needs to be improved in order for displays to perform well in bright ambient light environments. Lamp life is an important issue with projection displays, and one method for increasing lamp life is to increase system throughput. The relative positions of the light source, lenses and contrast enhancement elements of a projection screen can have an effect on screen throughput. For example, the Fresnel lens has a fixed focal length, and any variation from this in design or production of the Fresnel lens, position of the projection lens, position of the light source, position of the folding or aspheric mirrors in the system can cause a significant amount of light to be absorbed by the contrast enhancing element.
In other words, in many rear projection display systems, the light from a projection lens that passes through the Fresnel lens and lenticular lens does not form bright lines of light with constant line thicknesses, constant pitch, or parallel lines light on the black stripe region. If light is not perfectly collimated and parallel to the optic axis, then the black stripe regions may absorb more of the system intensity than is desired, thus reducing screen throughput. With most system designs, the exact angle and degree of collimation of the light incident on the screen can vary, and designing each screen component to account for these variations individually can be cost prohibitive. To counteract for these issues, systems and screen components are either designed with very high tolerances or suffer reduced brightness or contrast.
Fresnel reflections can also reduce the system throughput and can result in ghost images in certain situations. The ability to reduce these reflections is limited because low-cost anti-reflection coating techniques typically require planarized surfaces.
Complete screens for high resolution, high contrast projection displays are manufactured using non-continuous assembly techniques. In order to reduce the cost of manufacturing, techniques for producing a screen would need a complete roll-to-roll manufacturing method.
The present invention provides rear projection screens that are thinner and that can be manufactured cheaply using roll-to-roll processes. The screens of the invention also offer increased throughput and higher contrast. By using planar materials having a differential refractive index, an optical element suitable for use in projection screens, having improved contrast and brightness, is provided. These flat screen components eliminate the need for an air gap between the light-redirecting array, e.g., Fresnel lens, and the other screen components, which thus reduces the screen thickness. This allows for the screen to be manufactured on a roll-to-roll process, that can significantly reduce the screen cost. By adding the capability of planarizing the elements, they can be combined in a final structure on a roll-to-roll process. Since the Fresnel lens can be combined with the lenticular lens before exposure of the black stripe region, the exposure of the black stripe region can account for any deviation from true collimation, de-centering, or non-normal angle of incidence of the light path in the projection system design.
Accordingly, in an embodiment, the invention includes an optical element having a first substantially planar element having a first refractive index nx1, a first light-receiving surface, and a first light-transmitting surface; a second substantially planar element having a second refractive index nx2, a second light-receiving surface, and a second light-transmitting surface, wherein the first light-transmitting surface and the second light-receiving surface cooperatively form an array for redirecting light transmitted through the first and second elements, and nx1≠nx2. The relative and respective values of nx1 and nx2 may be chosen as needed, and depending on the end used (i.e., where the light source is with respect to the screen.) In an embodiment, the array may be, e.g., a Fresnel lens or a lenticular lens. Desirably, the interface between the first light-transmitting surface and the second light-receiving surfaces is optically coupled. The optical element may be used as a lens array, collimating lens, an imaging screen, projection screen, light integrator (e.g. for uniformity) or other optical element that specularly or diffusely re-directs incident light.
In an embodiment of the invention, one or more of the screen elements may scatter light, e.g., may include light scattering particles such as spherical particles, birefringent particles or asymmetric scattering particles.
Desirably an embodiment of the invention includes an optical layer such as anti-reflective coating, anti-glare surface, reflective coating, and contrast-enhancing regions, on the second light-transmitting surface of the second element. More desirably the coating is a contrast enhancing region comprising sub-regions varying in concentration of a visible light absorbing material, such as a black-stripe coating.
In another embodiment, the invention relates to projection screens having a first substantially planar element having a first refractive index nx1, a first light-receiving surface, and a first light-transmitting surface, and a second substantially planar element having a second refractive index nx2, a second light-receiving surface, and a second light-transmitting surface, wherein the first light-transmitting surface and the second light-receiving surfaces cooperatively form an array for redirecting light transmitted through the first and second elements, and nx1≠nx2; a Fresnel lens element disposed on the first light-receiving surface; and a contrast enhancing region disposed on the second light-transmitting surface, wherein the contrast enhancing sub-regions are alternating light transmissive and light absorbing stripes.
In another embodiment, the invention relates to a method of manufacturing an optical element.
The features and other details of the invention will now be more particularly described. It will be understood that particular embodiments described herein are shown by way of illustration and not as limitations of the invention. The principal features of this invention can be employed in various embodiments without departing from the scope of the invention. All parts and percentages are by weight unless otherwise specified.
Definitions
For convenience, certain terms used in the specification and examples are collected here.
“Speckle”, often referred to also as scintillation, includes the optical interference pattern visible on a scattering element or perceived as coming from or near a scattering element. This can include color or intensity variations within an small area of interest.
“Speckle Contrast” is defined herein to include the ratio of the standard deviation of the intensity fluctuation to the mean intensity over the area of interest.
“Scatter,” “Scattering,” “Diffuse” and “Diffusing” as defined herein includes light scattering by reflection, refraction or diffraction from particles, surfaces, or layers.
“Optically coupled” is defined herein as including the coupling, attaching or adhering two or more regions or layers such that the intensity of light passing from one region to the other is not substantially reduced due to Fresnel interfacial reflection losses due to differences in refractive indices between the regions. Optical coupling methods include joining two regions having similar refractive indices, or by using an optical adhesive with a refractive index substantially near or in-between the regions or layers such as Optically Clear Adhesive 8161 from 3M (with a refractive index at 633 nm of 1.474). Examples of optically coupling include lamination using an index-matched optical adhesive such as a pressure sensitive adhesive; coating a region or layer onto another region or layer; extruding a region or layer onto another region or layer; or hot lamination using applied pressure to join two or more layers or regions that have substantially close refractive indices. A “substantially close” refractive index difference is about 0.5, 0.4, 0.3 or less, e.g., 0.2 or 0.1.
“Screen assembly” is defined herein as a single or combination of elements that can be components of a rear projection screen or alternatively an assembly suitable as a rear projection screen without the need for additional elements.
“Hardcoating” or “Hardcoat” is a coating applied to a surface of a screen element that hardens the surface of the screen element, thus reducing the appearance of scratches and protecting the screen element. Hardcoats can include anti-glare or surface relief characteristics or they can be coating onto surface relief structures providing anti-glare properties.
Screen resolution is defined as the smallest perceivable detail in an image. It is typically measured by projecting a pattern of alternating bright and dark lines on a projection screen and measuring the intensity of the image as described in VESA FPDM standard 303-7. From the intensity scan in the horizontal or vertical direction, the modulation depth of the intensity can be calculated for various line pairs per millimeter of the original pattern or image. The key resolution parameter is often defined as the highest number of lines per millimeter with an intensity modulation depth of 20% (as defined by Goldenberg et. al.). The independent performance of a projection screen is measured with a very high contrast pattern without using the projection engine of the screen in order to ascertain the screen's performance. The curve of contrast modulation versus line pairs per millimeter illustrates the resolution of the screen graphically. For example, a 55 inch 1080p High-Definition projection TV has a resolution of approximately 3.15 line pairs per millimeter. A similar 40 inch projection TV has a resolution of 4.34 line pairs per millimeter.
The “Gain” of a screen or light scattering element is the ratio of the maximum luminance of an illuminated light transmitting material in a given direction relative to the luminance of a theoretically perfect diffuser in the same direction. To measure the gain of a particular sheet of material, a known amount of light is directed to the sheet, and the maximum luminance is measured using a standard luminance meter. The maximum luminance of light measured is then compared to a theoretically “perfect” diffusive material.
The gain for an imperfect diffuser is the value of the maximum intensity (ML) divided by the value of the luminance of the theoretically perfect diffuser. For a theoretically perfect transmissive Lambertian diffuser material, providing one foot-candle (10.76 lumen/m2) of illumination to the material results in the luminance of one footlambert at all angles. Therefore, if the maximum intensity of luminance transmitted by a material is equal to one footlambert, its gain with respect to a theoretical diffuser is 1.0 for that angle of transmission. For imperfect diffusers the gain will be maximum (ML) and larger than 1 for a given viewing direction (typically measured orthogonal to the plane of the diffuser).
Thus a high gain screen will typically be brighter when viewed orthogonal to the plane than at other angles. Because the light transmitted by the material can never be more than the amount of light supplied, less light must be transmitted at angles other than the angle of maximum intensity.
“Angle of view” (AOV) is a measurement of luminance for all angles relative to two perpendicular axes in the plane of the material. These are called the X axis or the horizontal axis, and the Y axis or the vertical axis. The angle of view is measured by applying a “full-width at half maximum” approach, a “full-width at one-third maximum” approach, and a “full-width at one-tenth maximum approach.” The AOV at full-width at half maximum (α(½)) is calculated from sum of the absolute value of the angles (measured from an orthogonal to the plane of the material) at which the luminance at one-half the maximum luminance is measured and noted. For example, if angles of +35° and −35° were measured to have one-half of the maximum luminance in the horizontal direction, the AOV α(½) in the horizontal direction for the screen would be 70°. The AOV at full-width at one-third maximum (β(⅓)) and the AOV at full-width at one-tenth maximum (λ( 1/10)) are calculated similarly, except that they are calculated from the angles at which the luminance is one-third and one-tenth of the maximum light intensity respectively.
The “asymmetry ratio” is the horizontal AOV α(½) divided by the vertical AOV α(½), and thus is a measure of the degree of asymmetry between the horizontal luminance and the vertical luminance of the diffuser.
A “spheroidal” or “symmetric” particle includes those substantially resembling a sphere. A spheroidal particle may contain surface incongruities and irregularities but has a generally circular cross-section in substantially all directions. A spheroid is a type of ellipsoid wherein two of the 3 axes are equal. An “asymmetric” particle is referred to here as an “ellipsoidal” particle wherein each of the three axis can be a different length. Typically, ellipsoidal particles resemble squashed or stretched spheres.
“Planarized,” “Planarization,” and “Planar,” includes creating a substantially flat surface on an element. A flat surface refers to one that does not have a substantially varying surface normal angle across a surface of the element. More than one surface may be planarized. As typically used herein, a material region is combined with a surface of an element that has a surface structure such that the surface of the material opposite the element is substantially planar. Typically, planarized films or components can be easily laminated to another element using pressure sensitive adhesives or hot-lamination without trapping air bubbles of sufficient size to affect the optical performance of the combined element. Coatings, such as thin coatings used in some anti-reflection coatings can be applied more uniformly to planarized elements.
The second substantially planar element has a second refractive index nx2, a second light-receiving surface, and a second light-transmitting surface. The second light receiving surface may include a reverse Fresnel lens structure with blades designed for refraction and reflection. The element may be molded or embossed from a low refractive index material, such as aerogels, sol-gels or plastics with microscopic pores. The low refractive index material may be, e.g., between 1.01 (such as Silica Aerogel from Marketech International Inc.) and 1.47 (such as used in optical adhesives). In a preferred embodiment, the aerogel is a polymer containing micro-pores less than 100 nm in size that is capable of being cast, coated, or embossed into an array.
The first substantially planar element has a first refractive index nx1, a first light-receiving surface, and a first light-transmitting surface. The first substantially planar element may be made by coating, i.e., onto the second light-receiving surface, a high refractive index material such as Nitto Denko's high-refractive index thermosetting polymer capable of reaching a refractive index of 1.76 (See Nitto Denko Press Release, 11 Nov. 2003, at http://www.nitto.com/company/release/03—11—11/index.html). Light that encounters a high refractive index-low refractive index interface can totally internally reflect if the angle is larger than the critical angle. The interfaces may be designed to reflect the light in a radially varying pattern such that they collimate the light from the “point” light source of a projector. The interfaces may also be designed such that the light reaching the interface at a designed angle will refract to a near normal angle due to the refractive index difference between the high and low refractive index materials. In some designs, the Fresnel lens and its use in a projection system is designed to work in off-axis, de-centered, or non-collimating conditions to achieve more desirable range of optical output angles.
In one embodiment, the light-transmitting elements are composed of a matrix material that is preferably durable, stable, and allows optical coupling to other materials, such as a hardcoat, an anti-reflective coating, or a contrast enhancement layer. Suitable matrix materials include acrylics, such as polymethylmethacrylates; polyesters; polystyrenes; polyolefins, such as polyethylenes, polypropylenes, and their copolymers; polyamides; organic acid cellulose esters, such as cellulose acetate butyrates, cellulose acetates, and cellulose acetate propionates; and polycarbonates. The matrix may also include compatibilizers to improve the processing and performance of the material. In a preferred embodiment, Spectar 14471 copolyester from Eastman Chemical Company may be used.
Types of asymmetric light scattering features which may be used in the invention include volumetric and surface relief. Surface relief and volumetric asymmetric light scattering elements can be combined. “Asymmetric light scattering surfaces” include diffractive structures, refractive structures, and reflective structures in small or high frequencies or modulations. One or more characteristics of the surface patterns or features may be regular, random, or partially random. Surface relief structures herein include those that refract, diffract, scatter, diffuse, reflect or otherwise alter the direction, angular extent or divergence of incident light, independently of how they are made. For example, surface features recorded holographically and then stamped or embossed into a surface are included as surface relief structures. Undulations on the surface of a material due to exposure to radiation that ablates material or alters the physical, chemical, or optical properties are also deemed surface relief structures. Surface relief structures are typically on a surface of a material exposed to air, although when they are embedded within a medium, they can effectively create a volumetric, asymmetric light scattering region.
Volumetric, asymmetric light scattering elements may include asymmetrically shaped particles within a host matrix material, graded-refractive index (GRIN) lenses or regions, physically, holographically or optically formed asymmetric regions. The light scattering features within the bulk volume of material may vary in size, shape, concentration, and composition, providing that the refractive index within the volume of the material varies in at least one of the x, y, or z directions sufficiently to asymmetrically scatter incident light. Example of asymmetric, volumetric scattering materials include stretched asymmetric particles in a host matrix material, radiation exposed photopolymers that enable refractive index variations, asymmetrically shaped voids or regions of materials or elements that differ in refractive index of the host matrix material, and embedded surface relief features.
The thickness of one or more of the volumetric asymmetric light scattering regions affects the resolution and the speckle contrast. In one embodiment, the thickness of one or more of the asymmetric light scattering regions is less than 10 mm. In another embodiment, the thickness may be less than 9, 8, 7, 6 or 5 mm. In another embodiment, the thickness may be less than 3 mm. In a more preferred embodiment, the thickness of one or more of the asymmetric light scattering regions is less than 2 or 1 mm.
Asymmetric particles can be added to the multi-region light scattering element or they can be created during manufacturing in order to obtain one or more regions with asymmetric light scattering characteristics. In one embodiment of this invention, a multi-region light scattering element is created when particles not substantially asymmetric in shape may be stretched along an axis after coating or during or after an extruding process such that they become asymmetric in shape. Other methods for achieving a single region of asymmetric particles in a region are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,932,342, the text of which is incorporated herein by reference. By using multiple layers or multi-region methods such as co-extrusion, optical lamination, optical coupling, thermal bonding, multiple regions containing light scattering particles can be combined into a single light scattering element. The degree of stretching can control the asymmetry and thus achieve a desired level of asymmetric light scattering. The asymmetric particles may have a large variation in size depending on the desired level of asymmetry.
The asymmetric particles in at least one region of a multi-region light scattering element can be obtained by reducing particles in size in the x, y or other directions by stretching a film after extrusion. These particles have a refractive index np1 different from the host matrix material refractive index nh1 defined by at least one of |nhx1−npx1|≧0.001, |nhy1−npy1|≧0.001, or |nhz1−npz1|≧0.001 such that sufficient light scattering for the desired viewing angle is achieved. In a preferred embodiment, the particles are located in more than one region with the regions spaced apart by a non-scattering region of the host matrix material.
The asymmetric features, e.g., particles, typically are all oriented with their major axes substantially in one direction parallel to the plane of the surface of the material. Desirably, the particles are made from a material which is capable of being deformed at a processing temperature in order to create their asymmetric or ellipsoidal shape by stretching. Particles such as glass beads or cross-linked acrylic beads are not suitable for this application because they can not be stretched at processing temperatures suitable for manufacturing. Further, the volume density of the particles, the average ellipsoidal particle minor axis size, and the index of refraction the ellipsoidal particles may be optimized to control the horizontal viewing angle and other desired properties of the material.
The average particle size of the particles in the matrix may be from about 1 μm to about 30 μm, preferably from about 2 μm to about 15 μm, and most preferably from about 2 μm to about 5 μm in the minor dimension.
The differential refractive index (ΔnME) defined as the absolute value of the difference between the index of refraction of the matrix (nM) and the index of refraction of the ellipsoidal particles (nE), or |nM−nE|, may be from about 0.005 to about 0.2, and preferably is from about 0.007 to about 0.1.
Suitable materials for the particles include acrylics such as polymethylacrylates; polystyrenes; polyethylenes; polypropylenes; organic acid cellulose esters such as cellulose acetate butyrates, cellulose acetates, and cellulose acetate propionates; polycarbonates; silicones; or glass spheres. The particles may also contain coatings of higher or lower refractive index materials, or they may be hollow materials containing a gas mixture such as air. In a preferred embodiment, polyethylene may be used.
The differential refractive index (ΔnMS) defined as the absolute value of the difference between the index of refraction of the matrix (nM) and the index of refraction of the particles (nS), or |nM−nS|, may be from about 0.005 to about 0.2, and preferably is from about 0.007 to about 0.1.
The field lens in a projection screen (such as a Fresnel lens, a hybrid Fresnel lens, or a high and low refractive index Fresnel lens) could be optically coupled to the high and low refractive index lenticular lens. A cost savings for assembly and separate component costs can be realized by being able to laminate (or otherwise adhere) these components together. Elimination of the air gap can reduce the total thickness of the screen and reduce the manufacturing cost. This could potentially enable web processing of the film and speed the production and lower the cost. A key element of this invention is the replacement of the air and traditional plastic material with a high and low refractive index materials such that the air gap can be eliminated.
Typically, the Fresnel lens is added as a component of the screen after the black stripe region has been formed or it is combined with the lenticular lens before formation of the black stripes. Collimated light is typically used when exposing the black stripe region through the lenticular lens. This does not allow for any deviation of light from the projection engine and Fresnel lens from normal incidence or true collimation. In one embodiment of this invention, a planarized high-low refractive index Fresnel lens is combined with a planarized high-low refractive index lenticular lens. Radiation simulating the angle of incidence and location of the projection engine light profile is directed through the Fresnel lens and lenticular lens onto the radiation sensitive region. The pattern of radiation reaching the light sensitive material is therefore adjusted for any deviation from collimation, de-centering, or non-normal angle of incidence. This exposure will determine the size and shape of the clear apertures and black stripes post processing.
By creating a single, combined element screen, the light from a light source can be used to accurately create the clear apertures in the black stripe material that correspond more accurately to the end-use projection system. The single element corrects the optical path and aligns it to the position and angular range of the light from the projection lens. This enables accurate exposure of the black stripe material, creating more precisely matched clear apertures, thus optimizing the throughput of the system and increasing the screen contrast. In some applications, the resulting clear apertures may resemble transparent lines, however, other shapes, features or openings may also be created. For example, when off-axis, de-centered, or non-collimating Fresnel lenses are used, the apertures after the cylindrical lens may vary in size, shape, orientation (non-parallel, for example), pitch (non-constant, for example) in different regions of the contrast enhancing region. In conventional systems, the light from the Fresnel lens is not exactly collimated and it is sometimes desired to have the light over or under collimated (diverging or converging). Conventional lenticular lens arrays are not normally adjusted for this range of angular deviations from collimation (it is usually optimized for collimated light), thus a significant portion of the light is absorbed and the optical path is not corrected. The present invention allow for use of Fresnel lens structures in a larger range of under-corrected or over-corrected conditions. In addition to the angular range optical path correction, the source location can be corrected. For example, in some situations, the light from a rear-projection TV is designed to be off-axis such that less light is directed toward the floor. This can be accomplished by placing the light source below the central axis of the Fresnel lens structure. However, this affects the light profile from the lenticular lenses, resulting in non-uniform line shapes. In a traditional system, a portion of this light will be either absorbed (not making it through the narrow parallel apertures) or in the case of using wider, parallel clear apertures, less ambient light will be absorbed and the contrast will be reduced.
Additionally, because either side of the screen is substantially planer, the screen may be laminated to a rigid substrate. The planarized optical element of the invention can be used with the higher refractive index portion on the side of the projection lens so that the light is substantially refracted before reaching the surface relief profile. This will enable it to collimate larger angles and thus enable larger screens.
The planar optical element of the invention is a new technology that can enable a single piece screen to be assembled. Traditionally, the exposure of the black stripe region is done through the lenticular lens only and it is commonly assumed that the light in the final system will be substantially collimated. One would not normally consider the effects of the off-axis illumination (or under or over collimation) from a Fresnel lens in the exposure of the black stripe material because of the complication of fixing the final Fresnel lens parameters, including its spacing from the lenticular lens. By using the new high-low refractive index lenticular lens technology, the lenticular lens can be optically coupled to the Fresnel lens before the light sensitive material is exposed. The optical path correction can also enable more than one black stripe region to be used to further enhance the contrast of the screen by absorbing more ambient light. This will limit the angles through which the ambient light can pass through the clear apertures and degrade the screen contrast.
The planarized Fresnel lens of this invention can be optically coupled to a lenticular lens with a light sensitive material that can be processed to produce black stripes (such as Chromalin by DuPont). This combination can be combined with a diffusive material and substrate to create a multi-element combined screen without an air gap. A traditional Fresnel lens may also be combined with a planarized lenticular lens as shown in
One embodiment of a high contrast optical path corrected screen is shown in
In a further embodiment of a method for manufacturing a high contrast optical path corrected screen, the screen of
In a further embodiment of a method for manufacturing a high contrast optical path corrected screen, the screen of
In a further embodiment of a method for manufacturing a high contrast optical path corrected screen, the screen of
In a further embodiment of a method for manufacturing a high contrast optical path corrected screen, the screen of
Variations of the preceding embodiments are included within the scope of this invention. This include, but are not limited to locating the symmetric, asymmetric, or combination of particles within different regions or elements of the screen. These can include locating the particles within the lenticular lens (the high or low refractive index region), the black stripe region or in a separate region optically coupled to at least one of the regions. The light scattering region may be multi-phase. The elements of the screen can be oriented such that light from the projection engine first reaches the high or low refractive index region.
The different variations in features and designs of the high contrast optical path corrected screen described herein can be envisioned and include one or more combinations of the features described below:
Other high contrast optical path corrected screen configurations and methods of manufacturing can be envisioned within the scope of this invention.
Preferred embodiments of the present invention are illustrated in the following Example(s). The following examples are given for the purpose of illustrating the invention, but not for limiting the scope or spirit of the invention.
The planarized Fresnel lens of
The planarized lenticular lens of
The high contrast optical path corrected screen of
The high contrast optical path corrected screen of
Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, numerous equivalents to the specific procedures described herein. Such equivalents are considered to be within the scope of the invention. Various substitutions, alterations, and modifications may be made to the invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Other aspects, advantages, and modifications are within the scope of the invention. The contents of all references, issued patents, and published patent applications cited throughout this application are hereby incorporated by reference. The appropriate components, processes, and methods of those patents, applications and other documents may be selected for the invention and embodiments thereof.
Yeo, Terence E., Coleman, Zane A.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10228507, | Jul 10 2008 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Light source and optical article including viscoelastic lightguide disposed on a substrate |
8220932, | Jan 08 2009 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Dry erasable projection article and system |
8922888, | Nov 23 2009 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Front projection screen with high contrast |
8958152, | Sep 09 2010 | SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO , LTD | Optical plate and tiled display apparatus having the same |
9088008, | Oct 15 2009 | JDI DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT G K | Display panel device, display device, and method of manufacturing display panel device |
9146342, | Jan 13 2010 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Illumination device having viscoelastic lightguide |
9285531, | Aug 08 2008 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Lightguide having a viscoelastic layer for managing light |
9304243, | Jan 13 2010 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Illumination device having viscoelastic lightguide |
9519206, | Jun 25 2015 | GOOGLE LLC | High contrast projection screen with stray light rejection |
9638841, | Apr 10 2014 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Laminated diffuser |
9778555, | Jun 25 2015 | X Development LLC | High contrast projection screen with stray light rejection |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4773731, | Aug 28 1987 | North American Philips Corp. | One-piece projection screen |
4934798, | Mar 16 1983 | Lens deflection system | |
5066099, | Apr 26 1989 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Rear projection screen and method of producing the same |
5724182, | Mar 23 1995 | Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. | Optical sheet and a light transmission screen using the same |
5932342, | Nov 14 1996 | MASSACHUSETTS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AGENCY | Optical diffusers obtained by fluid phase mixing of incompatible materials |
6239907, | Sep 03 1999 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | Rear projection screen using birefringent optical film for asymmetric light scattering |
6295162, | Jan 20 1997 | Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. | Rear projection screen with optical sheet having irregularities caused by diffusing material smoothed with a transparent control layer |
6989929, | Aug 09 2002 | DAI NIPPON PRINTING CO , LTD | Fresnel lens sheet and rear projection screen including the same |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 13 2005 | Fusion Optix Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 28 2005 | YEO, TERENCE E | FUSION OPTIX INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017308 | /0212 | |
Nov 28 2005 | COLEMAN, ZANE A | FUSION OPTIX INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017308 | /0212 | |
Jan 18 2008 | Fusion Optix, Inc | RILEY, JAMES J | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 020518 | /0927 | |
Sep 15 2008 | Fusion Optix, Inc | CREE LED LIGHTING SOLUTIONS, INC | CONFIRMATORY STATEMENT OF RIGHTS | 021561 | /0112 | |
Nov 23 2010 | Fusion Optix, Inc | Cree, Inc | CONFIRMATORY STATEMENT OF RIGHTS | 025413 | /0634 | |
Aug 28 2012 | RILEY, AS COLLATERAL AGENT, JAMES J | Fusion Optix, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 028865 | /0961 | |
Aug 31 2012 | FUSION OPTIX INC | MASSACHUSETTS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AGENCY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 029062 | /0794 | |
Dec 04 2018 | MASSACHUSETTS DEVELOPMENT FINANCE AGENCY | FUSION OPTIX INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047721 | /0017 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 02 2012 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Sep 20 2012 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 20 2012 | LTOS: Pat Holder Claims Small Entity Status. |
Sep 25 2012 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Sep 25 2012 | M2554: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity. |
Jul 01 2016 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 18 2016 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 18 2011 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 18 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 18 2012 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 18 2014 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 18 2015 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 18 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 18 2016 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 18 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 18 2019 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 18 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 18 2020 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 18 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |