A golf ball which is formed from a vulcanized rubber compound composed of 100 parts by weight of a rubber base material, 10 to 60 parts by weight of an unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof, 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of an organosulfur compound, 5 to 80 parts by weight of an inorganic filler, and 0.1 to 3 parts by weight of an organic peroxide, the rubber base material being composed of a first polybutadiene accounting for 50 to 95 wt % and a second polybutadiene accounting for 5 to 50 wt %, both polybutadiene being synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst, the first polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no lower than 50 and the second polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no higher than 45. The golf ball is characterized by good rebound resilience and good workability with which it is produced.
|
21. A golf ball comprising a solid core, an intermediate layer and a cover layer wherein the solid core is formed from a vulcanized rubber compound composed of, 100 parts by weight of a rubber base material, 10 to 60 parts by weight of an unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof, 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of an organosulfur compound, 5 to 80 parts by weight of an inorganic filler, and 0.1 to 3 parts by weight of an organic peroxide, said rubber base material being composed of a first polybutadiene accounting for 80 to 95 wt % and a second polybutadiene accounting for 5 to 20 wt %, both polybutadiene being synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst, said first polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no lower than 50 and said second polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no higher than 45, the solid core has a deflection under a load of 980 N (100 kg) of no less than 2.0 mm and no more than 6.0 mm, the intermediate layer is formed mainly of a polyester elastomer and the cover is formed mainly of an ionomer resin.
10. A golf ball comprising a solid core, an intermediate layer and a cover layer wherein the solid core is formed from a vulcanized rubber compound composed of, 100 parts by weight of a rubber base material, 10 to 60 parts by weight of an unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof, 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of an organosulfur compound, 5 to 80 parts by weight of an inorganic filler, and 0.1 to 3 parts by weight of an organic peroxide, said rubber base material being composed of a first polybutadiene accounting for 80 to 95 wt % and a second polybutadiene accounting for 5 to 20 wt %, both polybutadiene being synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst, said first polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no lower than 50 and said second polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no higher than 45, the solid core has a deflection under a load of 980 N (100 kg) of no less than 2.0 mm and no more than 6.0 mm, the intermediate layer is formed mainly of an ionomer resin and the cover is formed mainly of a polyurethane elastomer.
1. A golf ball comprising a solid core, an intermediate layer and a cover layer wherein the solid core is formed from a vulcanized rubber compound composed of, 100 parts by weight of a rubber base material, 10 to 60 parts by weight of an unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof, 0.1 to 5 parts by weight of an organosulfur compound, 5 to 80 parts by weight of an inorganic filler, and 0.1 to 3 parts by weight of an organic peroxide, said rubber base material being composed of a first polybutadiene accounting for 80 to 95 wt % and a second polybutadiene accounting for 5 to 20 wt %, both polybutadiene being synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst, said first polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no lower than 50 and said second polybutadiene containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and having a mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no higher than 45, the solid core has a deflection under a load of 980 N (100 kg) of no less than 2.0 mm and no more than 6.0 mm, the intermediate layer has a thickness no smaller than 0.5 mm and no larger than 3.0 mm, and the cover has a thickness of no smaller than 0.7 mm and no larger than 3.0 mm.
2. The golf ball of
3. The golf ball of
4. The golf ball of
5. The golf ball of
6. The golf ball of
7. The golf ball of
8. The golf ball of
9. The golf ball of
11. The golf ball of
12. The golf ball of
13. The golf ball of
14. The golf ball of
15. The golf ball of
16. The golf ball of
17. The golf ball of
18. The golf ball of
19. The golf ball of
20. The golf ball of
22. The golf ball of
23. The golf ball of
24. The golf ball of
25. The golf ball of
26. The golf ball of
27. The golf ball of
28. The golf ball of
29. The golf ball of
30. The golf ball of
31. The golf ball of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 10/929,423 filed Aug. 31, 2004 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,223,819. The entire disclosure of the prior application, application Ser. No. 10/929,423, is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present invention relates to a golf ball characterized by good rebound resilience, good flying performance, and good extrusion workability with which it is produced. The golf ball has a solid core formed from an improved rubber compound.
In an attempt to impart good rebound resilience to golf balls, various improvements have been made on the formulation of polybutadiene as a base material for golf balls.
Among such improvements is a new rubber compound for solid balls which was disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Sho 62-89750, for example. This rubber compound is composed of a polybutadiene (as the base material) having a Mooney viscosity of 70 to 100, which is synthesized by using a nickel or cobalt catalyst, and another polybutadiene having a Mooney viscosity of 30 to 90, which is synthesized by using a lanthanum-based catalyst, or another polybutadiene having a Mooney viscosity of 20 to 50, which is synthesized by using a nickel or cobalt catalyst.
However, there still exists a demand for improvement on rebound resilience.
Also, there is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 2-268778 a golf ball which is molded from a blend of a polybutadiene having a Mooney viscosity less than 50, which is synthesized by using a group VIII element catalyst, and another polybutadiene having a Mooney viscosity less than 50, which is synthesized by using a lanthanide catalyst. This golf ball, however, is poor in rebound resilience.
Moreover, there is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 11-70187 a multi-piece solid golf ball having an intermediate layer formed from a polybutadiene having a low Mooney viscosity. There is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 11-319148 a solid golf ball formed from a rubber compound composed of a polybutadiene having a Mooney viscosity of 50 to 69, which is synthesized by using a nickel or cobalt catalyst, and another polybutadiene having a Mooney viscosity of 20 to 90, which is synthesized by using a lanthanoid-based catalyst. There is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 11-164912 a solid golf ball formed from a rubber compound which contains no more than 2.0% of 1,2-vinyl bond and has an Mw/Mn ratio no larger than 3.5 (which is a ratio of weight-average molecular weight to number-average molecular weight). There is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Sho 63-275356 a golf ball which is formed from a rubber compound containing a polybutadiene having a high Mooney viscosity. There is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 3-151985 a golf ball which is formed from a rubber compound composed of two kinds of polybutadiene, one having a high number-average molecular weight and the other having a low number-average molecular weight. However, all the disclosed rubber compounds merely give golf balls poor in rebound resilience.
There is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Sho 61-71070 a rubber compound with two kinds of organic peroxide, and there is disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Sho 62-112574 a rubber compound with a smaller amount of organic peroxide. These rubber compounds, however, are poor in rebound resilience and slow in crosslinking, which leads to extremely low productivity.
Also, the rubber compounds disclosed in Japanese Patent Laid-open Nos. 2001-149505 to 2001-149507 still have room for improvement on rebound resilience.
The present invention was completed in view of the foregoing. It is an object of the present invention to provide a golf ball characterized by good shot feel, good rebound resilience, and good flying performance. The golf ball permits production with good extrusion workability, short vulcanizing time, and high productivity.
In order to achieve the above-mentioned object, the present inventors carried out extensive researches, which led to the following finding. A solid golf ball with good rebound resilience can be produced with high productivity if its solid core is formed from a vulcanized product of a rubber compound which is composed of a rubber base material and additives as specified below. The rubber base material is composed of two kinds of polybutadiene, both synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst. The two polybutadienes contain cis-1,4 bonds in an amount less than 60 wt %, but one has a Mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no lower than 50 and the other has a Mooney viscosity no higher than 45. The additives include an unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof, an organosulfur compound, an inorganic filler, and an organic peroxide. Their amount based on 100 parts by weight of the rubber base material is 10 to 60, 0.1 to 5, 5 to 80, and 0.1 to 3 parts by weight, respectively. The organic peroxide should be composed of two or more species differing half-life such that the ratio of bt/at is 7 to 20, where at denotes the half-life of an organic peroxide (a) having the shortest half-life at 155° C. and bt denotes the half-life of an organic peroxide (b) having the longest half-life at 155° C.
In other words, it was found that a rubber compound exhibits good extrusion workability and yields golf balls that excel in rebound resilience if it is composed of a high-Mooney viscosity polybutadiene and a low-Mooney viscosity polybutadiene, both synthesized by using a rare earth metal catalyst. It was also found that, unlike the conventional technology in which a rubber compound with an organic peroxide in a reduced amount needs a long vulcanizing time (which leads to low productivity) and has poor rebound resilience, a rubber compound improves in workability and decreases in vulcanizing time (thereby improving in productivity) and exhibits higher rebound resilience, if it is based on a high-resilient polybutadiene synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst and it is also compounded with a small amount of two or more organic peroxides greatly differing in half-life. The present invention is based on the foregoing finding.
The present invention is directed to a golf ball defined in the following.
The invention will be described in more detail in the following.
The golf ball according to the present invention is formed from a specific vulcanized rubber compound which is composed of,
(A) a rubber base material composed mainly of two polybutadienes synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst, both containing no less than 60 wt % of cis-1,4 bonds and differing in Mooney viscosity (M1+4 (100° C.)) from each other,
(B) an unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or a metal salt thereof,
(C) an organosulfur compound,
(D) an inorganic filler, and
(E) an organic peroxide.
The first and second polybutadienes constituting component (A) should contain cis-1,4 bonds in an amount no less than 60%, preferably no less than 80%, more preferably no less than 90%, and most desirably no less than 95%. (“%” means “wt %” hereinafter.) The rubber compound will be poor in rebound resilience if the content of cis-1,4 bonds is excessively small.
Moreover, the polybutadienes should contain 1,2-vinyl bonds in an amount no more than 2%, preferably no more than 1.7%, and more preferably no more than 1.5%. The rubber compound will be poor in rebound resilience if the content of 1,2-vinyl bonds is excessively large.
The first polybutadiene should have a Mooney viscosity (ML1+4 (100° C.)) no smaller than 50, preferably no smaller than 51, more preferably no smaller than 52, and most desirably no smaller than 54, and no larger than 140, preferably no larger than 120, more preferably no larger than 100, and most desirably no larger than 80.
The second polybutadiene should have a Mooney viscosity no large than 45, preferably no larger than 40, more preferably no larger than 38, and most desirably no larger than 36, and no smaller than 10, preferably no smaller than 15, more preferably no smaller than 20, and most desirably no smaller than 25.
Incidentally, “Mooney viscosity” used in the present invention is an index of viscosity for industrial use which is measured (according to JIS K6300) with a Mooney viscometer as a rotary plastometer. It is expressed in terms of ML1+4 (100° C.), where M stands for Mooney viscosity, L stands for large rotor (L type), 1+4 indicates that duration of preheating is one minute and duration of rotor rotation is four minutes, and 100° C. is the temperature at which measurement is carried out.
The polybutadiene used in the present invention should be one which is synthesized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst selected from any known ones.
An example of the catalyst is a combination of a compound of a lanthanum rare earth element with an organoaluminum compound, alumoxane, halogen containing compound, and Lewis base (optional).
The compound of a lanthanum rare earth element includes halides, carboxylates, alcoholates, thioalcoholates, and amides of metals with an atomic number 57 to 71.
The organoaluminum compound includes those which are represented by AlR1R2R3 (where R1, R2, and R3 are identical or different groups, each denoting hydrogen or a residue of C1-8 hydrocarbon compound).
The almoxane is a compound having the structure represented by the formula (I) or (II) below. It may take on an associated form as described in Fine Chemical 23, (9), 5 (1994), J. Am. Chem. Soc., 115, 4971 (1993), and J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117, 6465 (1995).
##STR00001##
(where, R4 is a C1-20 hydrocarbon group and n is an integer of 2 or above.)
The halogen containing compound may be any of aluminum halide, strontium halide, and metal halides. The aluminum halide is a compound represented by AlXnR3−n (where, X denotes a halogen, R denotes a residue of C1-20 hydrocarbon compound, such as alkyl, aryl, and aralkyl, and n is 1, 1.5, 2, or 3). The strontium halide includes Me3SrCl, Me2SrCl2, MeSrHCl2, and MeSrCl3. The metal halide includes silicon tetrachloride, tin tetrachloride, and titanium tetrachloride.
The Lewis base includes acetylacetone and ketone alcohol, which are used to complex the compound of lanthanoid series rare earth element.
The lanthanum series rare earth compound which is advantageously used as a catalyst in the present invention is a neodymium compound. It is highly active to yield a polybutadiene with a high content of 1,4-cis bonds and a low content of 1,2-vinyl bonds. Examples of this catalyst are given in Japanese Patent Laid-open No. Hei 11-35633.
For the polybutadiene polymerized by using a rare earth element-based catalyst (or lanthanum series rare earth compound) to have the cis content and Mw/Mn ratio as specified above, it is desirable that the amount of butadiene should be 1,000 to 2,000,000 times, particularly 5,000 to 1,000,000 times, the amount of the lanthanum series rare earth compound (in molar ratio). It is also desirable that the molar ratio of AlR1R2R3 to the lanthanum series rare earth compound should be from 1 to 1,000, particularly from 3 to 500. It is also desirable that the molar ratio of the halogen compound to the lanthanum series rare earth compound should be from 0.1 to 30, particularly from 0.2 to 15. It is also desirable that the molar ratio of the Lewis base to the lanthanum series rare earth compound should be from 0 to 30, particularly from 1 to 10. Polymerization may be bulk polymerization or vapor phase polymerization with or without solvent. The polymerization temperature is usually from −30° C. to 150° C., preferably from 10° C. to 100° C.
Polymerization of butadiene by using the rare earth element-based catalyst may be either bulk polymerization or vapor phase polymerization with or without solvent. The polymerization temperature is usually from −30° C. to 150° C., preferably from 10° C. to 100° C.
The polybutadiene as component (A) in the present invention may be a modified polybutadiene which is obtained if polymerization by using a rare earth element-based catalyst is followed by reaction of the polymer's active end groups with an end group modifier.
The modified polybutadiene rubber may be obtained by using any of the following seven end group modifiers.
Any of the alkoxysilane compounds listed above may be used in combination with a Lewis acid to enhance its reactivity when it is applied to active end groups. The Lewis acid functions as a catalyst to promote the coupling reaction, so that the resulting modified polymer has improved storage stability with less cold flow. Examples of the Lewis acid include dialkyltin dialkyl malate, dialkyltin dicarboxylate, and aluminum trialkoxide.
##STR00002##
(where Y is an oxygen atom, nitrogen atom, or sulfur atom).
##STR00003##
(where, R8 to R16 are identical or different C1-50 hydrocarbon groups, X is a halogen atom, and m is an integer of 1 to 5.)
##STR00004##
(where, R17 to R23 are identical or different C1-20 hydrocarbon group; M″ is a tin atom, silicon atom, or germanium atom; and l is an integer of 0 to 3).
Typical examples and usage of the end group modifiers listed above are shown in Japanese Patent Laid-open Nos. Hei 11-35633, Hei 7-268132, and 2002-29399.
According to the present invention, the first and second polybutadienes should have a molecular weight distribution Mw/Mn (where Mw denotes a weight-average molecular weight and Mn denotes a number-average molecular weight), which is no smaller than 2.0, preferably no smaller than 2.2, more preferably no smaller than 2.4, most desirably no smaller than 2.6, and no larger than 6.0, preferably no larger than 5.0, more preferably no larger than 4.0, most desirably no larger than 3.4. With an excessively small or larger value of Mw/Mn, the rubber compound will be poor in workability or poor in rebound resilience, respectively.
According to the present invention, the rubber base material is composed mainly of the first and second polybutadienes. The amount of the first polybutadiene in the rubber base material should be no less than 50%, preferably no less than 60%, more preferably no less than 70%, most desirably no less than 75%, and no more than 95%, preferably no more than 90%, more preferably no more than 85%, most desirably no more than 80%. On the other hand, the amount of the second polybutadiene in the rubber base material should be no less than 5%, preferably no less than 10%, more preferably no less than 15%, most desirably no less than 20%, and no more than 50%, preferably no more than 40%, more preferably no more than 30%, most desirably no more than 20%. The first polybutadiene in an excessively large amount will hamper extrusion workability, and the second polybutadiene in an excessively large amount will adversely affect rebound resilience.
Incidentally, the rubber base material may optionally be compounded with other rubber components than the polybutadienes. Such rubber components include polybutadiene excluding the one mentioned above polymerized by using a catalyst which is a metal compound of a group VIII element, diene rubber (such as styrene butadiene rubber), natural rubber, isoprene rubber, and ethylene propylene diene rubber.
The unsaturated carboxylic acids used as component (B) include acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, maleic acid and fumaric acid. Acrylic acid and methacrylic acid are especially preferred. Metal salts of the unsaturated carboxylic acid include zinc salt and magnesium salt. Zinc acrylate is especially preferred.
The amount of the unsaturated carboxylic acid and/or salt thereof as component (B), based on 100 parts of the rubber base material, should be no less than 10 parts, preferably no less than 15 parts, more preferably no less than 20 parts, and no more than 60 parts, preferably no more than 50 parts, more preferably no more than 45 parts, most desirably no more than 40 parts. (“Parts” means “parts by weight” hereinafter.)
The organosulfur compound as component (C) includes thiophenols, thionaphthols, halogenated thiophenols and metal salts thereof, and polysulfides having 2 to 4 sulfur atoms. Typical examples include pentachlorothiophenol, pentafluorothiophenol, pentabromothiophenol, p-chlorothiophenol and zinc salts thereof, alkylphenyl polysulfides having 2 to 4 sulfur atoms (such as diphenylpolysulfide, dibenzylpolysulfide, dibenzoylpolysulfide, dibenzothiazoylpolysulfide, and dithiobenzoylpolysulfide), alkylphenyldisulfide, sulfur compound having a furan ring, and sulfur compounds having a thiophen ring. Of these examples, diphenyldisulfide and zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol are especially preferred.
The amount of the organosulfur compound, based on 100 parts of the rubber base material as component (A), should be no less than 0.1 part, preferably no less than 0.2 part, more preferably no less than 0.4 part, most desirably no less than 0.7 part, and no more than 5 parts, preferably no more than 4 parts, more preferably no more than 3 parts, most desirably no more than 2 parts, particularly no more than 1.5. With an excessively small amount, the organosulfur compound does not produce the effect of improving rebound resilience; the rubber compound containing the organosulfur compound in an excessively large amount is too soft to provide sufficient rebound resilience.
The inorganic filler as component (D) includes zinc oxide, barium sulfate, and calcium carbonate. The amount of the inorganic filler for 100 parts of component (A) should be no less than 5 parts, preferably no less than 7 parts, more preferably no less than 10 parts, most desirably no less than 13 parts, and no more than 80 parts, preferably no more than 65 parts, more preferably no more than 50 parts, most desirably no more than 40 parts. With an excessively large or small amount, the inorganic filler does not provide an adequate weight and good rebound resilience.
The organic peroxide as component (E) may be selected from known ones. Its typical examples include dicumyl peroxide, 1,1-bis(t-butylperoxy)-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexane, and α,α′-bis(t-butylperoxy)diisopropylbenzene. They are commercially available under such trade names as Percumyl D (from NOF Corporation), Perhexa 3M (from NOF Corporation), and Luperco 231XL (from Atochem Co.).
The organic peroxide may be one species or a combination of two or more species. It is desirable to use two or more species of organic peroxides from the standpoint of rebound resilience. In this case, they should differ in half-life as specified below. Assuming that the half-life at 155° C. of one organic peroxide having the shortest half-life is designated as at and the half-life at 155° C. of another organic peroxide having the longest half-life is designated as bt, then the ratio of bt/at should be no smaller than 7, preferably no smaller than 8, more preferably no smaller than 9, most desirably no smaller than 10, and no larger than 20, preferably no larger than 18, more preferably no larger than 16, most preferably no larger than 14. The rubber compound failing to meet this requirement will be poor in rebound resilience, compression, and durability.
The organic peroxide (a) should have a half-life at (at 155° C.) which is no shorter than 5 seconds, preferably no shorter than 10 seconds, more preferably no shorter than 15 seconds, and no longer than 120 seconds, preferably no longer than 90 seconds, more preferably no longer than 60 seconds. The organic peroxide (b) should have a half-life bt (at 155° C.) which is no shorter than 300 seconds, preferably no shorter than 360 seconds, more preferably no shorter than 420 seconds, and no longer than 800 seconds, preferably no longer than 700 seconds, more preferably no longer than 600 seconds. The organic peroxide (a) should preferably be 1,1-bis(t-butylperoxy)-3,5,5-trimethylcyclohexane, and the organic peroxide (b) should preferably be dicumyl peroxide.
The total amount of the organic peroxides, based on 100 parts of the rubber base material as component (A), should be no less than 0.1 part, preferably no less than 0.2 part, more preferably no less than 0.3 part, and most desirably no less than 0.4 part, and no more than 3 parts, preferably no more than 2 parts, more preferably no more than 1 part, most desirably no more than 0.8 part, particularly no more than 0.6 part. With an excessively small amount, the rubber compound takes a long time for crosslinking (which leads to low productivity) and the crosslinked product is subject to large compression. With an excessively large amount, the crosslinked product is poor in rebound resilience and durability.
In the case where two or more species of organic peroxides (a) and (b) are used in combination, the amount of (a), based on 100 parts of component (A), should be no less than 0.05 part, preferably no less than 0.08 part, more preferably no less than 0.1 part, and no more than 1.5 parts, preferably no more than 1 part, more preferably no more than 0.7 part, most desirably no more than 0.4 part; and the amount of (b), based on 100 parts of component (A), should be no less than 0.05 part, preferably no less than 0.15 part, more preferably no less than 0.2 part, and no more than 1.5 parts, preferably no more than 1 part, more preferably no more than 0.7 part, most desirably no more than 0.4 part.
The rubber compound may optionally be compounded with an antioxidant. The amount of the antioxidant for 100 parts of component (A) should be no less than 0.05 part, preferably no less than 0.1 part, more preferably no less than 0.2 part, and no more than 3 parts, preferably no more than 2 parts, more preferably no more than 1 part, most desirably no more than 0.5 part. The antioxidant may be selected from commercial ones, such as Nocrac NS-6, Nocrac NS-30 (both from Ouchi Shinko Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.), and Yoshinox 425 (from Yoshitomi Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.).
The rubber compound mentioned above may be vulcanized and cured in the same way as the known rubber compound for golf balls. Vulcanization will take 10 to 40 minutes at 100 to 200° C.
The vulcanized product mentioned above may be formed into golf balls of various types in any manner such that they are uniform or varied in hardness across their cross section.
The golf ball according to the present invention may vary in types, such as one-piece golf ball or multi-piece golf ball having a solid core or a solid center. The one-piece golf ball, solid core, or solid center should have adequate stiffness so that their deflection under a load of 980 N (100 kg) is usually no less than 2.0 mm, preferably no less than 2.5 mm, more preferably no less than 2.8 mm, most desirably no less than 3.2 mm, and no more than 6.0 mm, preferably no more than 5.5 mm, more preferably no more than 5.0 mm, most desirably no more than 4.5 mm. An excessively large deflection leads to an unpleasant shot feel and a short flying distance due to deformation and extreme spin caused by a driver shot. An excessively small deflection not only leads to a dull shot feel and an insufficient rebound resilience (which in turn leads to a short flying distance) but also adversely effects resistance to cracking caused by repeated shots.
The golf ball according to the present invention is made up of the vulcanized product obtained from the rubber compound mentioned above. The type of the golf ball is not specifically restricted. It may be a one-piece golf ball, which is formed entirely from the vulcanized product. It may be a two-piece solid golf ball consisting of a solid core and a cover layer formed thereon. The solid core is formed from the vulcanized product. It may be a multi-piece solid golf ball (or three-piece golf ball) consisting of a solid core and two or more cover layers. The solid core is formed from the vulcanized product. It may be a wound golf ball having a center core which is formed from the vulcanized product. Two-piece and multi-piece solid golf balls, in which the solid core is formed from the vulcanized product of the present invention, are desirable from the standpoint of good extrudability, good vulcanizability, and good rebound resilience.
The solid core should have a diameter no smaller than 30.0 mm, preferably no smaller than 32.0 mm, more preferably no smaller than 35.0 mm, most desirably no smaller than 37.0 mm, and no larger than 41.0 mm, preferably no larger than 40.5 mm, more preferably no larger than 40.0 mm, most desirably no larger than 39.5 mm. Particularly, the solid core for two-piece solid golf balls should have a diameter no smaller than 37.0 mm, preferably no smaller than 37.5 mm, more preferably no smaller than 38.0 mm, most desirably no smaller than 38.5 mm, and no larger than 41.0 mm, preferably no larger than 40.5 mm, more preferably no larger than 40.0 mm. The solid core for three-piece solid golf balls should have a diameter no smaller than 30.0 mm, preferably no smaller than 32.0 mm, more preferably no smaller than 34.0 mm, most desirably no smaller than 35.0 mm, and no larger than 40.0 mm, preferably no larger than 39.5 mm, more preferably no larger than 39.0 mm.
The solid core should have a specific gravity no lower than 0.9, preferably no lower than 1.0, more preferably no lower than 1.1, and no higher than 1.4, preferably no higher than 1.3, more preferably no higher than 1.2.
In the case where the present invention is applied to two-piece solid golf balls or multi-piece golf balls, the solid core is made from the vulcanized product mentioned above and the solid core is enclosed with any known cover material and intermediate layer material by injection molding or pressure molding.
The cover material or intermediate layer material should be based on a polyurethane elastomer (thermoplastic or thermosetting), polyester elastomer, ionomer resin, or polyolefin elastomer, or a mixture thereof. They may be used alone or in combination with one another. Of these materials, thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers and ionomer resins are preferable.
The thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer mentioned above is commercially available as exemplified below. Pandex T7298, Pandex T7295, Pandex T7890, Pandex TR3080, Pandex T8295, Pandex T8290, and Pandex T8260 (all from DIC Bayer Polymer, Ltd.), which are produced from an aliphatic or aromatic diisocyanate. The ionomer resin mentioned above is commercially available as exemplified below. Surlyn 6320, Surlyn 8120 and Surlyn 9945 (both from E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Co., Inc.), and Himilan 1706, Himilan 1605, Himilan 1855, Himilan 1601, Himilan 1557 (all from Mitsui-DuPont Polychemicals Co., Ltd.).
In addition, the cover material or intermediate layer material may optionally be compounded with a thermoplastic elastomer or polymer (excluding those mentioned above), such as polyamide elastomer, styrene block elastomer, hydrogenated polybutadiene, and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer.
The two-piece solid golf ball or multi-piece solid golf ball according to the present invention may be produced by any known method without specific restrictions. A preferred method for two-piece or multi-piece golf balls consists of placing the solid core (formed from the vulcanized product mentioned above) in the injection mold and forming the cover layer (in the case of two-piece golf ball) or forming the intermediate layers and cover layer (in the case of multi-piece golf ball) by injection molding. In some cases, the cover layer may be formed by pressure molding.
The intermediate layer of the multi-piece solid golf ball should have a thickness no smaller than 0.5 mm, preferably no smaller than 1.0 mm, and no larger than 3.0 mm, preferably no larger than 2.5 mm, more preferably no larger than 2.0 mm, most desirably no larger than 1.6 mm.
The cover layer of both the two-piece solid golf ball and the multi-piece solid golf ball should have a thickness no smaller than 0.7 mm, preferably no smaller than 1.0 mm, and no larger than 3.0 mm, preferably no larger than 2.5 mm, more preferably no larger than 2.0 mm, most desirably no larger than 1.6 mm.
The golf ball according to the present invention should conform to the rules for competition, which state that the diameter should be no smaller than 42.67 mm and the weight should be no more than 45.93 g. The upper limit of the diameter should preferably be no larger than 44.0 mm, more preferably no larger than 43.5 mm, most desirably no larger than 43.0 mm. The lower limit of the weight should preferably be no less than 44.5 g, more preferably no less than 45.0 g, further preferably no less than 45.1 g, most desirably no less than 45.2 g.
The golf ball according to the present invention permits production with good workability and exhibits excellent rebound resilience.
The invention will be described in more detail with reference to the following examples and comparative examples, which are not intended to restrict the scope thereof.
Polybutadiene shown in Table 1 was made into a rubber compound according to the formulation shown in Table 2. This rubber compound was formed into a core of a two-piece golf ball by vulcanization at 155° C. for 20 minutes. The core measures 38.9 mm in diameter and weighs 36.0 g. This core was covered with a 1:1 mixture (by weight) of Himilan 1601 and Himilan 1557 by injection molding which forms dimples in the surface. After surface coating with paint, there was obtained a two-piece solid golf ball measuring 42.7 mm in diameter and weighing 45.3 g.
The core was tested for deflection under a load of 100 kg (980 N) and rebound resilience in the following manner. The golf ball was examined for extrudability and flying performance in the following manner. The results are shown in Table 2.
A rubber compound was prepared according to the formulation shown in Table 3. This rubber compound was vulcanized at 155° C. for 20 minutes to make a core of a three-piece golf ball, which measures 36.4 mm in diameter and weighs 29.7 g. This core was enclosed with an intermediate layer, 1.65 mm thick, which was injection-molded from a 35:35:30 mixture (by weight) of Surlyn 9945, Himilan 1605, and Dynalon 6100P.
The intermediate layer was further coated with a 1:1 mixture (by weight) of Pandex T8260 and Pandex T8295 by injection molding which forms dimples in the surface. Thus, there was obtained a three-piece solid golf ball measuring 42.7 mm in diameter and weighing 45.5 g.
The core was tested for deflection under a load of 100 kg (980 N) and rebound resilience in the following manner. The golf ball was examined for extrudability and flying performance in the following manner. The results are shown in Table 3.
A rubber compound was prepared according to the formulation shown in Table 4. This rubber compound was vulcanized at 170° C. for 30 minutes to make a one-piece golf ball, which measures 42.7 mm in diameter and weighs 45.3 g. This golf ball examined for its performance. The results are shown in FIG. 4.
Deflection Under a Load of 100 kg
The solid core or the one-piece golf ball was tested for deflection (mm) under a load of 100 kg (980 N).
Rebound Resilience
Rebound resilience was evaluated by measuring the initial velocity with an apparatus of the same type as approved by USGA (United States Golf Association). In Examples 1 to 5 and Comparative Examples 1 to 6, the results are expressed in terms of difference from the initial velocity (as the standard) in Comparative Example 1. In Example 6 and Comparative Examples 7 and 8, the results are expressed in terms of difference from the initial velocity (as the standard) in Comparative Example 8. In Example 7 and Comparative Examples 9 and 10, the results are expressed in terms of difference from the initial velocity (as the standard) in Comparative Example 10.
Flying Performance
Flying performance was evaluated by shooting the golf ball at a head speed of 45 m/s (HS 45) with a driver (W#1, Tour Stage X500, loft 9°, shaft X, made by Bridgestone Sports) operated by a shooting machine.
Extrusion Workability
The extruded slug was examined for surface texture and shape, and the result was rated according to the following criterion.
4: very smooth surface texture
3: slightly rough surface texture
2: fuzzy surface texture, extrudable
1: irregular shape, not extrudable
TABLE 1
Content
Content
of
of
Mooney
Molecular
cis-1,4
1,2-vinyl
viscosity
weight
bonds
bonds
(ML1+4
distribution
Kind
Maker
Catalyst
(wt %)
(wt %)
(100° C.))
(Mw/Mn)
BR
BR 01
JSR
Ni
96
2.5
46
4.2
(polybutadiene)
BR 11
Ni
96
2
43
4.4
BR 18
Ni
96
2
59
4.2
BR 730
Nd
96
1.3
55
3
CNB 700
Nd
96.2
1.3
43
2.8
BR 51
Nd
96
1.3
35.5
2.8
TABLE 2
Example
Comparative Example
1
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
6
Core Formulation
BR
BR 01
100
30
(parts by weight)
BR 11
BR 18
70
BR 730
80
90
80
80
80
100
25
70
80
CNB 700
20
BR 51
20
10
20
20
75
30
20
(a)
Amount
0.3
0.6
0.3
0
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Perhexa
Actual
(0.12)
(0.24)
(0.12)
(0)
(0.12)
(0.24)
(0.12)
(0.24)
(0.24)
(0.24)
(0.24)
3M-40 *1
(b) Percumyl D *2
0.3
0.6
0.3
1.2
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Zinc oxide
20
19.5
20
19.5
19
19.5
20
19.5
19.5
19.5
20
Antioxidant
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Zinc acrylate
28
28
28
28
30
28
28
28
28
28
28
Zinc salt of
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0
pentachlorothiophenol
Core
Deflection under a
3.3
2.9
3.3
2.9
2.9
2.9
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.1
2.7
performance
load of 100 kg (mm)
Rebound resilience
+0.4
+0.6
+0.4
+0.4
+0.8
+0.6
±0
±0
+0.1
-0.1
-0.2
(m/s)
Extrusion
4
3
3
4
4
1
4
4
4
3
4
workability
Flying
#W1
Carry (m)
216.7
218.8
216.5
217.0
220.5
218.5
212.5
212.1
213.3
211.0
210.3
performance
HS 45
Total (m)
232.8
234.5
232.5
232.4
236.3
234.3
228.7
228.0
229.5
226.8
225.5
Remarks:
*1 Half-life = 40 seconds,
*2 Half-life = 480 seconds.
Perhexa 3M-40 is a 40% diluted product. (The actual amount is in a parenthesis.)
Note to Table 2
Comparative Example 1: The sample was good in rebound resilience but was very poor in workability because it was formed from BR alone which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 2: The sample was good in workability but was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from a rubber compound containing a large amount of low-rebound BR which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 3: The sample was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from low-rebound BR which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 4: The sample was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from a rubber compound containing a large amount of low-rebound BR which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 5: The sample was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from a rubber compound containing a low-rebound BR which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 6: The sample was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from a rubber compound which was not compounded with zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol.
TABLE 3
Example
Comparative Example
6
7
8
Core
BR
BR 01
100
Formulation
BR 11
(parts by
BR 18
weight)
BR 730
80
100
CNB 700
BR 51
20
(a) Perhexa 3M-40
Amount
0.3
0.6
0.6
(Half-life =
Actual
(0.12)
(0.24)
(0.24)
40 seconds)
(b) Percumyl D
0.3
0.6
0.6
(Half-life = 480 seconds)
Zinc oxide
20
19.5
19.5
Antioxidant
0.1
0.1
0.1
Zinc acrylate
26
24
24
Zinc salt of pentachlorothiophenol
0.6
0.6
0.6
Core
Deflection under a load of 100 kg (mm)
3.9
3.9
4.1
performance
Rebound resilience (m/s)
+0.8
+0.6
±0
Extrusion workability
4
1
4
Flying
#W1
Carry (m)
220.1
219.8
214.1
performance
HS 45
Total (m)
236.3
235.7
230.3
Note to Table 3
Comparative Example 7: The sample was good in rebound resilience but was poor in workability because it was formed from BR alone which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 8: The sample was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from low-rebound BR which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
TABLE 4
Example
Comparative Example
7
9
10
Core
BR
BR 01
100
Formulation
BR 11
(parts by
BR 18
weight)
BR 730
80
100
CNB 700
BR 51
20
Percumyl D
0.7
0.7
1
Zinc oxide
23
23
23
Antioxidant
0.2
0.2
0.2
Methacrylic acid
23
23
23
Titanium oxide
1
1
1
Core
Deflection under a load of 100 kg (mm)
2.7
2.7
2.7
performance
Rebound resilience (m/s)
+0.8
±0.8
±0
Extrusion workability
4
1
4
Flying
#W1
Carry (m)
207.3
207.0
199.3
performance
HS 45
Total (m)
220.1
219.8
212.0
Note to Table 4
Comparative Example 9: The sample was good in rebound resilience but was poor in workability because it was formed from BR alone which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Comparative Example 10: The sample was poor in rebound resilience because it was formed from low-rebound BR which was polymerized by using a Ni-based catalyst.
Higuchi, Hiroshi, Nanba, Atsushi, Sasaki, Hiroto, Kataoka, Nobuyuki
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 8920263, | Aug 13 2012 | FENG TAY ENTERPRISES CO , LTD | Golf ball with resin inner core and specified inner core and ball compression |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 4546980, | Sep 04 1984 | ACUSHNET COMPANY, A DE CORP | Process for making a solid golf ball |
| 4683257, | Jun 12 1985 | Bridgestone Corporation | Rubber compositions for solid golf balls |
| 4770422, | Nov 01 1985 | Acushnet Company | Composition for making durable golf balls and other products |
| 4929678, | May 02 1987 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Rubber composition and a solid golf ball obtained therefrom |
| 4955613, | Mar 06 1989 | Acushnet Company | Polybutadiene golf ball product |
| 5082285, | Nov 07 1989 | Sumitomo Rubber Industries, Ltd. | Solid golf ball |
| 6194505, | Dec 03 1997 | JSR Corporation | Rubber composition for solid golf ball and solid golf ball |
| 6312346, | Aug 29 1997 | SRI Sports Limited | Multi-piece solid golf ball |
| 7223819, | Aug 31 2004 | BRIDGESTONE SPORTS CO , LTD | Golf ball |
| 20020052254, | |||
| 20030125450, | |||
| 20030207999, | |||
| JP11164912, | |||
| JP11319148, | |||
| JP1135633, | |||
| JP1170187, | |||
| JP2001149505, | |||
| JP2001149507, | |||
| JP2002293996, | |||
| JP2004180733, | |||
| JP2268778, | |||
| JP3151985, | |||
| JP6171070, | |||
| JP62112574, | |||
| JP6289750, | |||
| JP63275356, | |||
| JP7268132, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Apr 19 2007 | Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Jul 21 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Jul 11 2012 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Jul 28 2016 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Sep 28 2020 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Mar 15 2021 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Feb 10 2012 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 10 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 10 2013 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Feb 10 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Feb 10 2016 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 10 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 10 2017 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Feb 10 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Feb 10 2020 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Aug 10 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Feb 10 2021 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Feb 10 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |