In the present invention, a pmos device comprises a channel region formed in {100} silicon with first and second source/drain region disposed on either side of the channel region. The channel region is oriented such that a current flow between the source/drain regions has a <100> direction through the channel region. Dielectric regions create a compressive stress on the channel region perpendicular to the current flow.
|
1. A method of forming a device, comprising the steps of:
forming a channel region in a {100} silicon substrate;
forming first and second source/drain regions on either side of the channel region, such that a current flow between the first and second source/drain regions has a <100> direction through the channel region;
forming trenches in the silicon substrate on opposing ends of the channel region; and
forming dielectric regions within the trenches that create a compressive stress on the channel region perpendicular to the direction of the current flow.
6. A method of forming an integrated circuit, comprising the steps of:
forming a plurality of pmos devices, comprising the steps of
forming a pmos channel region in a {100} silicon substrate;
forming first and second pmos source/drain regions on either side of the pmos channel region, such that a current flow between the pmos source/drain regions has a <100> direction through the pmos channel region; and
forming first dielectric regions that create a compressive stress on the pmos channel region perpendicular to the current flow; and
forming a plurality of nmos devices, comprising the steps of
forming an nmos channel region in the {100} silicon substrate;
forming first and second nmos source/drain regions on either side of the nmos channel region, such that a current flow between the nmos source/drain regions has a <100> direction through the nmos channel region; and
forming second dielectric regions creating a lateral compressive stress on the nmos channel region perpendicular to the current flow.
2. The method of
3. The method of
5. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
|
This application is a divisional of application Ser. No. 10/930,638, filed Aug. 31, 2004.
Not Applicable
1. Technical Field
This invention relates in general to integrated circuits and, more particularly, to transistor structures.
2. Description of the Related Art
The great majority of electronic circuits used today are fabricated using a CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) process. There are two types of CMOS devices, N-type devices (NMOS) and P-type (PMOS) devices. An N-type device is turned on or off by the movement of electrons through an n-type doped channel. A P-type device is turned on or off by the movement of holes (electron vacancies) through a p-type doped channel.
The speed of a CMOS circuit depends largely upon the speed of the CMOS transistors. There is always pressure to increase the speed of the transistors to increase the processing capacity of a circuit. While much of the increases in speed over the last decade have been the result of smaller channel sizes, further increases in speed by reducing feature size will be more and more difficult to obtain.
For many years, it has been known that applying stress to a semiconductor material can change the mobility of electrons or holes in the doped regions. The effect of stress is dependent upon the lattice structure of the semiconductor material, the orientation of the channels on the semiconductor material, the type of stress (i.e., tensile or compressive), and the direction of the stress.
In U.S. Ser. No. 09/727,296 (Pub. No. US 2002/0063292), which is incorporated by reference herein, a method of forming CMOS devices so that current flows along a <100> direction in {100} silicon while applying a tensile longitudinal stress to the CMOS device. According to this reference, this technique increases electron mobility in the NMOS devices, while have a negligible effect on the PMOS devices.
In general, even in the absence of any stress, NMOS devices are significantly faster than PMOS devices in a given processing technology. Therefore, a need has arisen for a process which increases the speed of PMOS devices.
In the present invention, a PMOS device comprises a channel region formed in {100} silicon with first and second source/drain region disposed on either side of the channel region. The channel region is oriented such that a current flow between the source/drain regions has a <100> direction through the channel region. Dielectric regions create a compressive stress on the channel region perpendicular to the current flow.
The present invention provides a significant advantage over the prior art. By aligning the PMOS transistors with the current path in the <100> direction, hole mobility is greatly increased. Electron mobility in NMOS transistors similarly oriented does not show significant degradation.
For a more complete understanding of the present invention, and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
The present invention is best understood in relation to
It is claimed that when a longitudinal tensile stress is applied to an n-type region of a {100} semiconductor wafer, the piezoresistive coefficient is at a minimum (approximately −100 units) in the <100> direction. When the same longitudinal tensile stress is applied to a p-type region of the semiconductor wafer, the piezoresistive coefficient is only slightly above the neutral condition. Accordingly, it is claimed that if transistors are aligned such that current flows in the <100> direction and longitudinal tensile stress is applied to the channels in the <100> direction, then the resulting NMOS transistors will have an increase in speed without affecting the performance of the PMOS transistors.
Tests have shown that the improvement will not be as great as expected in the NMOS transistors as would be indicated by the piezocoefficients; further, to the extent that an improvements exists, the speed difference between the NMOS and PMOS transistors will be increased even more.
Table 1 demonstrates the improvements in PMOS transistors oriented in the <100> direction with transverse compressive stress applied to the channels compared to transistors with longitudinal tensile stress.
TABLE 1
ΔIdsat/Idsat and ΔGm/Gm Changes
<100> Channel
<110> Channel
Idsat
Gm
Piezo
nwell
Idsat
Gm
Piezo
nwell
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
Lg = 10 μm
—
—
Lg = 10 μm
—
—
NMOS
Longitudinal
4.8
5.6
10.0
10.2
3.4
3.5
3.1
3.2
NMOS
Transverse
1.2
1.2
−5.3
−5.4
1.2
1.4
1.8
1.8
PMOS
Longitudinal
0
0
−0.7
—
−7.5
−7.5
−7.2
—
PMOS
Transverse
−2.6
−2.7
0.1
—
6.8
6.9
6.6
—
Lg = 40 nm
Lg = 40 nm
NMOS
Longitudinal
1.7
1.7
1.6
2.1
NMOS
Transverse
0.4
0.8
0.5
0.6
PMOS
Longitudinal
0
0
−2.7
−4.9
PMOS
Transverse
−1.1
−2
2.3
3.4
Table 1 shows the changes, ΔIdsat/Idsat and ΔGm/Gm, by 100 MPa tensile stress for transistors with gate length of 40 nm and 10 μm. It should be noted that the sign of the measurements changes for compressive stress. The standard deviation of the measured ΔIdsat/Idsat is about 0.2%, and that of Gm is about 0.4%. The predicted changes by piezoresistance coefficients can be compared with the measured changes in 10 μm MOSFETs. There are obvious differences between the piezoresistance coefficients and the measured changes in Gm and drive currents in both n- and p-MOSFETs. To further validate the measurements, the built-in n-well resistors were measured simultaneously on the chips. The changes in conductance agree very well with piezoresistance coefficients, as listed in Table 1. The consistency between nwell resistors and piezoresistance coefficients and their disagreements with MOSFETs suggest that it is not possible to use the piezoresistance coefficients to predict the changes in drive currents of <100> MOSFETs even if the Lg dependence is taken into account. Table 1 also lists the changes, ΔIdsat/Idsat and ΔGm/Gm, of <110> channel transistors by 100 MPa tensile stress on the right side of the table for comparison. In this case, piezoresistance coefficients agree with the measured Gm and drive current changes in long-channel MOSFETs.
As can be seen from Table 1, for a PMOS transistor with a transverse 100 MPa compressive stress, a 10 μm gate length, an improvement of about 2.6% in current can be achieved, while the current of an NMOS transistor is decreased by only about 1.2%. For a 40 nm gate length, the PMOS transistor current increases by about 1.1%, while the NMOS current decreases by only 0.4%.
In
The present invention provides a significant advantage over the prior art. A faster PMOS transistor can be achieved with little affect on NMOS transistors in the same circuit. The speed gap between NMOS and PMOS transistors is thus narrowed.
Although the Detailed Description of the invention has been directed to certain exemplary embodiments, various modifications of these embodiments, as well as alternative embodiments, will be suggested to those skilled in the art. The invention encompasses any modifications or alternative embodiments that fall within the scope of the claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5970330, | Apr 02 1996 | Advanced Micro Services, Inc. | Method of making field effect transistor with higher mobility |
6211064, | Jun 30 1998 | Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. | Method for fabricating CMOS device |
6657276, | Dec 10 2001 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES U S INC | Shallow trench isolation (STI) region with high-K liner and method of formation |
6870179, | Mar 31 2003 | Intel Corporation | Increasing stress-enhanced drive current in a MOS transistor |
6876053, | Aug 13 1999 | Intel Corporation | Isolation structure configurations for modifying stresses in semiconductor devices |
6884667, | Dec 12 2002 | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc | Field effect transistor with stressed channel and method for making same |
6974738, | Jun 27 2003 | Intel Corporation | Nonplanar device with stress incorporation layer and method of fabrication |
7001844, | Apr 30 2004 | International Business Machines Corporation | Material for contact etch layer to enhance device performance |
20020063292, | |||
20040113174, | |||
20050093078, | |||
20050184345, | |||
20050224798, | |||
20050255667, | |||
20060043500, | |||
20060043579, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 26 2007 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 04 2012 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 27 2016 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 21 2020 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 19 2012 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 19 2012 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 19 2013 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 19 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 19 2016 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 19 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 19 2017 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 19 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 19 2020 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 19 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 19 2021 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 19 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |