A joint synchronizer and decoder that implements two decision aided processes, which are referred to as “decision aided candidate selection” and “decision aided synchronization and decoding.” decision aided candidate selection may be used to select a carrier frequency offset by selecting among a number of candidates for this parameter based on an indication of decoding success. decision aided synchronization and decoding may be used for phase tracking based on an indication of decoding success. Although these joint synchronizing and decoding techniques may be implemented together, they may also be implemented independently. The joint synchronizer and decoder may be implemented within a return channel receiver in a DVB-RCS system using turbo coding and quadrature phase shift key (QPSK) data modulation.
|
1. A joint decoder and synchronizer for operating on an input signal modulated with encoded data, having an iterative processor comprising:
a synchronization processor operative for receiving and synchronizing to input channel observations associated with the input signal;
a decoder operative for decoding synchronized channel observations received from the synchronization processor and producing an associated indication of decoding success;
a feedback loop supplying the indication of decoding success to the synchronization processor;
the synchronization processor further operable for adjusting its synchronization to the channel observations based on the indication of decoding success; and
wherein the synchronization processor further comprises a soft decision aided synchronization processor operative for computing a synchronization parameter based on the indication of decoding success, the soft decision aided synchronization processor further operative for computing a corrected channel observation based on the input channel observations and the synchronization parameter.
3. A joint decoder and synchronizer for operating on an input signal modulated with encoded data, including an iterative processor comprising:
a decoder assisted phase tracker operative for receiving and synchronizing to channel observations associated with the input signal and producing phase corrected channel observations;
a decoder operative for decoding the phase corrected channel observations received from the decoder assisted phase tracker and producing an associated indication of decoding success;
a feedback loop supplying the indication of decoding success to the decoder assisted phase tracker;
the decoder assisted phase tracker further operable for adjusting its synchronization to the channel observations based on the indication of decoding success; and
wherein the encoded data define systematic bits representing unknown data and parity bits derived from the systematic bits for integrity checking, and wherein the decoder assisted phase tracker further comprises a soft decision aided phase tracker operative for commuting a phase tracking parameter based on the systematic bits and the indication of decoding success, the soft decision aided phase tracker further operable for computing corrected channel observations based on the systematic bits and the phase tracking parameter.
2. The joint decoder and synchronizer of
4. The joint decoder and synchronizer of
5. The joint decoder and synchronizer of
a phase tracking module operative for receiving the phase tracking parameter from the soft decision aided phase tracker and computing a corrected channel observations based on the parity bits and the phase tracking parameter; and
a switch operative for feeding the systematic bits to the soft decision aided phase tracker, and for feeding the parity bits to the phase tracking module.
6. The joint decoder and synchronizer of
7. The joint decoder and synchronizer of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/502,283 entitled “Joint Synchronization and Decoding of Burst Signals” filed on Sep. 12, 2003, the subject matter of which is incorporated by reference. This application is also related to and incorporates by reference U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/938,299 entitled “Hybrid Frequency Offset Estimator,” which is commonly owned and concurrently filed with the present application.
The present invention is directed generally to digital signal processing techniques for burst-mode data signals having short observation lengths in an environment experiencing a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The invention is more particularly but not exclusively directed to a joint synchronizer and decoder (JSD) adapted for use in burst-mode phase shift key (PSK) modulation systems based on the Digital-Video Broadcast Return Channel via Satellite (DVB-RCS) standard.
The use of satellites for the transmission of voice and data communication signals has greatly expanded over the past decade, and satellite links are now routinely used and relied upon for global, almost instant, bi-directional communications. Rapid improvements in satellite communications have produced beneficial impacts on many segments of society from business and commercial applications to consumer products. For example, residences throughout the world now receive news and entertainment broadcasts via satellite, in nearly real-time from sites in almost any country.
Burst-mode communication techniques and the related synchronization techniques are frequently used in satellite voice and data transmissions. These systems typically employ multiple transmitters that send “bursts” of transmissions to a receiver. Bursts from the different transmitters are coordinated in time and frequency such that each transmitter can communicate with the receiver without interfering with each other. In one type of burst signal communication, Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA) allows multiple users to share a single carrier wave using time-division multiplexing (TDM) to transmit multiple signals on that carrier wave. TDM divides the carrier wave into time slots and then allocates those time slots to the different data signals. Effectively, each of the data signals takes turns accessing the carrier wave, thereby allowing a single carrier wave to carry multiple simultaneous data transmission. A Multi-Frequency Time Division Multiple Access (MF-TDMA) receiver simultaneously receives TDMA signals on several different carrier frequencies. In the MF-TDMA data transmission scheme, any user can potentially transmit data at any frequency at any time. The actual time slot and frequency allocation to each user is based on capacity requests submitted by the terminal.
Within the TDMA bursts specified in DVB-RCS Standard, the carrier signal is modulated by data symbols in which a phase characteristic of the symbol represents the data. This type of modulation technique is known as “phase shift keying” data modulation. In general, each symbol can be represented as a phasor in which the phase state of the symbol at the correct detection instant, or the relative change in phase from symbol to symbol, represents data. This data, in turn, can be expressed as a corresponding bit or combination of bits in which the number of bits corresponds to the number of possible phase states used for data modulation. For example, in binary phase shift keying (BPSK), each symbol may have one of two phase states (i.e., 0, π). Each BPSK symbol can therefore represent a single binary digit (bit). In quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), each symbol may have one of four phase states (i.e., 0, π/2, π and 3π/2). Each QPSK symbol can therefore represent two binary digits. In the general “M” phase shift keying (MPSK), each symbol may have “m” phase states. Each MPSK symbol can therefore represent “n” binary digits, where M=2n.
Typically, MF-TDMA signals are de-multiplexed and re-arranged to form a signal equivalent to a single carrier. The single-carrier data signal is then demodulated to recover the underlying data. The demultiplexing and demodulation steps are well known in the field of communications and are the subject of extensive research and development to improve transmission speeds, bandwidth, accuracy, and reliability.
Several satellite data transmission standards have been adopted to harmonize the transmission and reception of satellite communications broadcasts. One known standard adopted in the broadcast of Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) signals is the Digital Video Broadcast by Satellite (DVB-S). Standard EN 300 421 of the ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute). This standard relates to DVB services and transparent satellite communication systems to provide DVB-S services directly to the user through an integrated receiver/decoder device that is located in the user's home. The versatility of DVB-S in multiplexing permits the use of a transmission capacity encompassing a variety of television service configurations, including sound and data services.
The components of the DVB-S services are transmitted on a TDM carrier wave. For more information on the DVB-S standard, please refer to ETSI publication EN 300 421 V1.1.2 (1997-98), entitled “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Framing Structure, Channel Coding and Modulation for 11/12 GHz Satellite Services,” the subject matter of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Satellite broadcasts are also increasingly used for instantaneous two-way audio, video, and data communications. Accordingly, recent attention has been given to the demand for making satellite communications interactive so that recipients of the broadcast can also communicate back to the origin of the transmission. For example, satellite communications can be used to provide Internet connections between different users. In an effort to establish unified bi-directional satellite communications, the digital video broadcast with return channel by satellite (DVB-RCS) standard has been enacted by the ETSI.
The DVB-RCS standard relates to interaction channels on a satellite distribution system. The purpose of this standard is to provide basic specifications for providing interaction channels for interactive networks based on geostationary (GEO) satellites that incorporate return channel satellite terminals (RCST). The DVB-RCS standard facilitates the use of RCSTs for domestic installations both individual and collective types. The DVB-RCS standard likewise supports the connection of the terminals with home data networks, and can be applied to all frequency bands allocated to GEO satellite services. For more information on the DVB-RCS standard, refer to ETSI publication, EN 301 790 v.1.3.1, dated 2003-03, entitled “Digital Video Broadcasting (DVB); Interaction Channel for Satellite Distribution Systems,” the subject matter of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Satellite communication systems operating under the DVB-RCS standard can exchange data using a variety of network and Internet technologies. For example, the DVB-RCS standard accommodates Asynchronous Transfer Mode (ATM) technology for transferring data in cells or packets of a fixed size. The data packet used with ATM is relatively small compared to packets used with older technologies. The small, constant packet size allows ATM equipment to transmit video, audio, and computer data over the same network, and helps assure fairness. ATM creates a fixed channel, or route, between two points whenever data transfer begins, unlike TCP/IP that divides messages into packets that can each take a different route from source to destination. The DVB-RCS standard may also be used to transmit MPEGs (Moving Picture Experts Group), a family of digital video compression standards and file formats that achieve high compression rate by storing only the changes from one frame to another, instead of each entire frame.
Loss of bursts (or packets), as measured by packet loss ratio, is a main performance criterion under DVB-RCS. Due to a long propagation delay in geostationary satellite communications, the packet loss ratio should be low in order to avoid performance degradation at higher network layers. The human senses are generally tolerant of slight variations, so for the transmission of video and sound broadcasts, as defined by DVB-RCS, the packet loss ratios is preferably in the order of 1×10−5, so that less than one packet is lost per hundred-thousand burst signals. For more stringent types of data transmissions, a lower packet loss may be needed, such as 1×10−7, where less than 1 packet is lost per ten million packet transmissions.
One way to decrease the packet loss is to increase the signal transmission strength or effective isotropic radiated Power (EIRP) of the transmitter, thereby increasing the signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver. Improvements in the signal-to-noise ratio are desirable because, as provided by Shannon's theorem, the ultimate theoretical limit to the data transmission transfer rate on a communications channel is directly proportional the signal-to-noise ratio of that channel. Consequently, increasing the power transmitted on the return channel can often be a solution to provide adequately reliable communications. However, increasing the transmission power of the receiver unacceptably increases the cost of the receiver. Accordingly, there is a current need for a demodulation technology that allows reliable communications over a low-power burst-mode signal experiencing a low signal-to-noise ratio. More specifically, there is a current need for a demodulation technology that allows for sufficiently low packet loss rates for transmission in a DVB-RCS system while maintaining or even reducing current terminal transmission power levels in order to minimize the cost of user terminals.
Another important aspect of DVB-RCS system application is the provision of services at Ka-band frequencies (e.g., 30 GHz uplink from terminals to satellite). The cost of the user terminal plays a major role in the business model of this type of services. RF components of the terminals are costly. Less expensive RF components result in tighter link budget on the uplink from the terminal to satellite. For this application, the use of very power efficient modems is essential in order to maintain acceptable level of system availability.
Thus, there exist a further need for a demodulating technology that allows for sufficiently low packet loss ratio for DVB-RCS transmissions with a higher power efficiency. As suggested above, numerous technical and physical problems complicate the synchronization in satellite communications. For instance, the synchronization may be difficult where the transmitter and receiver are moving relative to each other. Specifically, when a burst-mode communications transmitter is on or near the earth and the intended receiver is in a satellite (or when a satellite transmits to the terrestrial receiver), the spatial locations and the relative velocities of the transmitter and receiver change over time. The change in spatial location causes the propagation path length and the signal propagation time to change, and the change in relative velocities causes a Doppler frequency to change the frequency of the burst-mode signal when it is received at the intended receiver. As a consequence, the burst-mode signals, originally transmitted at fixed intervals, arrive at varying time intervals. Furthermore, varying weather conditions, such as clouds and rain, also affect the communication signals. There is also certain level of inherent carrier frequency uncertainty at the transmitter output. Overall, these and other conditions cause carrier frequency offset in the burst-mode communications.
These issues are particularly present in DVB-RCS communications. At a DVB-RCS transmitter output, a 30 GHz carrier will generally appear with some carrier frequency offset fo, or residual error, so that carrier frequency (fc)=30 GHz±fo. As suggested above, contributors to the carrier frequency offset include movement of the satellite which creates a satellite Doppler effect, uncertainty due to the satellite's transponder, uncertainty or changes at the transmitter as to the exact carrier frequency, and length and atmospheric conditions en route. These and other contributors in the system deviate the carrier off its nominal value and synchronization is performed to correct for the carrier frequency offset and get the carrier back to its nominal or baseband state. In a sense, synchronization is a fine-tuning value for best receiver performance.
Accordingly, the synchronization process generally includes signal detection, finding the right timing (i.e., the symbol timing), finding the carrier frequency offset, and tracking the carrier phase. After the right combination of these factors is determined, thereby enabling synchronization, the data signal is demodulated from the carrier wave and the encoded symbols represented by the data signal is passed to a decoder to extract and deliver the payload data in the burst.
In synchronous digital transmission, information is conveyed by uniformly spaced pulses and the function of any receiver is to isolate these pulses as accurately as possible. However, the received signal has undergone changes during transmission due to the noisy nature of the transmission channel, resulting in signal distortion, such as carrier frequency offset and phase noise. Complete estimation and removal of these sources of signal distortion is necessary prior to data detection. A proper synchronization of a burst signal is needed to decode the transmitted data, and this process typically involves the identification, estimation and removal of these sources of signal distortion.
Conventional synchronization methods usually operate at relatively high signal-to-noise ratio that allow reliable synchronization. In addition, conventional burst signal demodulation techniques perform synchronization and then the decoding in a serial manner. For this reason, a receiver generally includes a cascade of receiving filter, synchronization, and decoding to process received burst signals. Since the return channel is operating at a very low signal-to-noise ratio, carrier synchronization using this traditional approach cannot alone give the right signal constellation. The currently known techniques for improving synchronization estimations generally rely on certain threshold criteria, such as having a sufficiently high signal-to-noise ratio, to determine the points where the synchronization problem occurs. When falling below the threshold value, the conventional algorithms fail to operate properly. Much of the current research and development is directed toward developing techniques to reduce this threshold level.
Theoretical studies can be conducted on existing estimators to determine their fundamental performance level, or their baseline, and this type of measurement may give some sort of theoretical bound for the performance of known techniques and algorithms used for parameter estimation. The theoretical limits to the performance of existing estimator designs (i.e., the performance under ideal situations) are inadequate to meet the needs of a faint burst-mode signals transmitted at a low power level, such as a return link channel in a DVB-RCS system.
As a result, there is an on-going need for techniques and systems for detecting and correcting for signal distortion, such as the carrier frequency offset and phase noise, that typically affect a burst-mode satellite communication system experiencing a low signal-to-noise ratio.
The present invention meets the needs described above in a joint synchronizer and decoder (JSD) that elects among multiple candidates for a signal distortion parameter based on a measure of decoding success. This process, which is referred to as “decision aided candidate selection,” increases the likelihood of selecting the correct estimate of the signal distortion parameter when the signal-to-noise ratio declines to the point where the noise may mask the signal distortion parameter. As a result, a receiver utilizing this technology can identify the correct signal distortion parameter, and thereby maintain synchronization, at a lower signal-to-noise ratio than a conventional receiver. This, in turn, allows the transmitter to meet a required data loss standard at a lower power level and cost, which is particularly advantageous in a system with price sensitive transmitters such as return channel transmitters in a satellite communication systems operating under the DBV-RCS standard.
In a particular embodiment, one source of signal distortion is carrier frequency offset, and the carrier frequency offset candidates represent several of the largest local maxima values in a modulation-free frequency spectrum of the input signal. In this case, selecting among multiple candidates for the carrier frequency offset increases the likelihood of selecting the correct carrier frequency offset when the signal-to-noise ratio declines to the point where the largest frequency in the modulation-free frequency spectrum may correspond to noise, rather than to the correct carrier frequency offset. But the JSD itself is independent of the source of estimates of the signal distortion, and may be used to process multiple candidates for sources of signal distortion other than carrier frequency offset.
In the phase tracking embodiment described above, the JSD may also implement a feedback loop in the decoding and phase tracking process referred to as “decision directed phase tracking.” In this process, an indicator of decoding success is used as a feedback parameter in the phase tracking process. This allows the carrier phase to be adjusted iteratively through a feedback loop in response to measured success of the decoding process. This invention represents a major improvement in synchronization technology for burst-mode communication systems, which again allows the transmitter to meet a required data loss standard at a lower the power level and cost.
Generally described, the invention may be implemented as a JSD that operates on an input signal modulated with encoded data. The JSD includes a number of channel observation modifiers that each receives an associated candidate signal distortion indicator and channel observations associated with the input signal. Each channel observation modifier also produces modified channel observations including the encoded data based on the associated candidate signal distortion indicator and the channel observations. The JSD also includes a synchronization processor associated with each channel observation modifier. Each synchronization processor receives modified channel observations from its associated channel observation modifier, synchronizes to the modified channel observations received from its associated channel observation modifier, and produces corrected channel observations. The JSD also includes a partial decoder associated with each synchronization processor. Each partial decoder partially decodes the encoded data embedded within the corrected channel observations received from its associated synchronization processor and produces an associated indication of decoding success. This allows a branch selector to select a signal distortion indicator for decode processing based on a comparison of the indications of decoding success received from the partial decoders.
The invention may also be practiced as a JSD that includes an iterative processor that receives and synchronizes to channel observations associated with an input signal. The iterative processor includes a decoder that decodes the synchronized channel observations received from a synchronization processor and produces an associated indication of decoding success. The iterative processor also includes a feedback loop that supplies the indication of decoding success to the synchronization processor. This allows the synchronization processor to adjust its synchronization to the channel observations based on the indication of decoding success. The iterative processor may also include a soft decision aided synchronization processor operative for computing a synchronization parameter based on the indication of decoding success. The soft decision aided synchronization processor also computes corrected channel observations based on the input channel observations and the synchronization parameter.
In particular, the input signal to the JSD may include burst-mode multi-frequency time division multiplexed (MF-TDMA) data in which the data signal is encoded using a quadrature phase shift key (QPSK) modulation technique in accordance with the digital video broadcast return channel via satellite(DVB-RCS) standard. The JSD may also include a channel observer for processing the input signal to produce the channel observations. More specifically, the channel observer may include a front-end analog processor that amplifies the input signal, down-converts the amplified input signal to obtain an intermediate frequency signal, and filters the intermediate frequency signal. The channel observer may also include a digital preliminary processor that digitizes a representation of the input signal to obtain a digital MF-TDMA signal, demultiplexes the MF-TDMA signal to obtain a concatenated single-channel TDMA signal, and detects burst-mode data packets within the single-channel TDMA signal to obtain the channel observations.
In addition, the encoded data typically includes a number of symbols, the indication of decoding success typically includes a log likelihood ratio (LLR) produced by the partial decoder for each symbol, and the branch selector typically selects a signal distortion indicator based on the highest average log likelihood ratio for each symbol over a common range of the symbols. These symbols typically have phase components modulated by the encoded data.
In a particular embodiment configured for correction of carrier frequency and phase offsets, the JSD includes a number of frequency correctors. Each frequency corrector receives an associated carrier frequency offset candidate and channel observations associated with the input signal. Each frequency corrector also produces modified. channel observations including the encoded data based on the associated carrier frequency offset candidate and the channel observations. The JSD also includes an initial phase estimator and corrector configured to initialize the modified channel observations to an initial phase.
This embodiment of the JSD also includes a phase tracking module associated with each frequency corrector. Each phase tracking module synchronizes to the initialized and modified channel observations received from its associated initial phase estimator and corrector to produce phase corrected channel observations. The JSD also includes a partial decoder associated with each phase tracking module. Each partial decoder partially decodes the encoded data embedded within the phase corrected channel observations received from its associated phase tracking module and produces an associated indication of decoding success. The JSD also includes a branch selector that selects a carrier frequency offset candidate for decode processing based on a comparison of the indications of decoding success received from the partial decoders.
For this example, the invention may also be practiced as a JSD that includes a decoder assisted phase tracker. This module receives and synchronizes to channel observations associated with the input signal and produces phase corrected channel observations. The JSD also includes a decoder that decodes the phase corrected channel observations received from the decoder assisted phase tracker and produces an associated indication of decoding success. The JSD also includes a feedback loop that supplies the indication of decoding success to the decoder assisted phase tracker. This allows the decoder assisted phase tracker to adjust its synchronization to the channel observations based on the indication of decoding success.
In this example, the indication of decoding success typically includes a log likelihood ratio produced by the decoder. In addition, the encoded data typically defines systematic bits representing unknown data and parity bits derived from the systematic bits. In this case, the decoder assisted phase tracker may include a soft decision aided phase tracker that computes a phase tracking parameter based on the systematic bits and the indication of decoding success. The soft decision aided phase tracker may also compute corrected channel observations based on the systematic bits and the phase tracking parameter. The decoder assisted phase tracker may also include a phase tracking module that receives the phase tracking parameter from the soft decision aided phase tracker and computes a corrected channel observations based on the parity bits and the phase tracking parameter. In this case, the decoder assisted phase tracker also includes a switch that feeds the systematic bits to the soft decision aided phase tracker. The switch also feeds the parity bits to the phase tracking module.
The phase tracking module also typically includes a feedback loop that includes a phase tracking parameter associated with the corrected channel observations. In addition, the soft decision aided phase tracker typically computes the phase tracking parameter by removing modulation from the channel observations, obtaining a resultant signal by weighting the modulation-free channel observations by a representation of the indication of decoding success, and computing a sliding average of the resultant signal.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated upon review of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing figures.
The main objective of the joint synchronizer and decoder (JDS) described below is to improve the power efficiency of burst-mode transmission of encoded data. Recent advancement in error correction coding techniques used over communication channels has made it possible to lower the transmitted power requirement to achieve a target performance for a given channel condition. Using schemes such as iterative decoding of turbo codes and Low Density Parity Check (LDPC) codes, the power requirements approach theoretical lower bounds established by channel capacity.
In a conventional coherent detection and decoding of encoded signal, it is essential to correct the channel observation for signal distortion, such as inter-symbol interference, carrier frequency offset, and phase noise prior to signal decoding. In particular, for burst-mode data transmission over satellite, the lack of accurate carrier frequency and phase synchronization can cause performance degradations that overshadow the strength of the error correction techniques. By using the improved error correcting technique of the JSD, acceptable data loss rates can typically be achieved at lower a signal-to-noise ratio than the threshold of conventional carrier synchronization circuits.
The rationale for the decoder assisted frequency correction is to allow the production of high quality parameter estimates at a low signal-to-noise ratio. A parameter that plays important role in synchronization is the carrier frequency offset. It is essential to obtain an accurate estimate of the carrier frequency offset and correct the channel observations accordingly before actual signal decoding. For the JSD described below, it is assumed that more than one candidate for the carrier frequency offset is available. It should be noted that a single estimate based on conventional estimation rules that ignore the underlying coding structure are occasionally far from the true value. This type of error in estimation is sometimes referred to as an “outlier.” Unfortunately, the probability of encountering an outlier increases when the signal-to-noise ratio decreases. The JSD takes advantage of the recognition that it is highly likely that the right estimate can be found among a fairly small number of candidates.
The proposed JSD takes advantage of the log-likelihood ratios (LLR) output from the soft-input-soft-output decoding algorithms as indications of decoding success. That is, the soft decision outputs (LLR values) of each decoder are used to establish a measure of likelihood of decoding success, so that one branch exhibiting the best indication of decoding success based on partial decoding can be selected for further processing. The mean absolute value of the soft decisions (LLR values) is used as a measure of merit of each branch. The soft decision values are computed for both systematic and parity bits. A branch with a small frequency estimate error is more likely to have a high average soft-decision value. Based on simulation results, one or two iterations of decoding in each branch is adequate to establish a good likelihood measure.
This JSD also implements methods for iterative improvement of channel observation based on an estimate of the carrier phase within each iteration loop. In order to modify the phase estimates, the soft decision values provided by the decoders are used to estimate and correct the phase variation over a block of channel observation.
More specifically described, the JSD typically implements two decision aided processes, which are referred to as “decision aided candidate selection” and “decision aided synchronization and decoding.” For example, “decision aided candidate selection” may be used to select a carrier frequency offset by selecting among a number of candidates for this parameter based on an indication of decoding success. Similarly, “decision aided synchronization and decoding” may be used for phase tracking based on an indication of decoding success. Although these joint synchronizing and decoding techniques may be implemented together, they may also be implemented independently.
The JSD shown in the accompanying figures and described below as a joint synchronizer and decoder within a return channel receiver in a DVB-RCS system using turbo coding and quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) data modulation. In this system, the JSD is employed to track and remove signal distortion caused by carrier frequency offset so that this particular source of signal distortion can be removed to improve the ability of the receiver to maintain synchronization in low signal-to-noise conditions. This, in turn, allows the receiver to meet typical DVB-RCS data loss requirements without increasing the transmission power of the return channel transmitter. Of course, carrier frequency offset is an important source of signal distortion in any communication system using a phase shift keying modulation technique because the carrier frequency offset directly influences the phase characteristic of the modulating signal. Nevertheless, is should be appreciated that the invention may be applied to the identification and removal of other types of signal distortion that may be more significant in other types of communications systems.
It should also be appreciated that the JSD may be applied to track and remove other types of signal distortion, such as phase noise or the combination of phase noise and carrier frequency offset, in any type of suitable device, such as a return channel receiver operating in accordance with the DVB-RCS standard. Accordingly, it should be understood that carrier frequency offset correction is one important application of the JSD, but that it may also be used to track and remove other types of signal distortion, and may be used for modulation systems other than phase shift keying.
Similarly, the JSD is described below in the context of a return channel receiver operating in accordance with the DVB-RCS standard, but may operate under other standards. Furthermore, the JSD is shown as operating in the return channel receiver of a ground-station hub of within a “bent pipe” satellite communication system, which is an important application of the invention. But the invention may also be deployed as on board processing (OBP) on the satellite or other communication platform, such as an airplane, missile or spacecraft. Embodiments of the invention may also be deployed in a terminal-to-terminal “mesh” communication system, or in any other suitable type of communication system.
The DVB-RCS standard relies on MF-TDMA burst-mode, packetized communications using quadrature phase shift key (QPSK) data modulation. Within this system, individual data packets are turbo decoded and include known symbols in a preamble and unknown data in a payload. A typical preamble length is 48 symbols. A typical length of the unknown payload portion of the data packet is 440 symbols. It should be understood that these parameters may all be varied for embodiments of the invention utilizing different communication techniques. In particular, known symbols, also referred to as “pilot” symbols, need not be located with a data packet preamble, but may be located anywhere within, and may be distributed throughout, the data packet.
At present, an important purpose for deploying the JSD is to minimize the required return channel transmission power required to maintain acceptable data loss levels for a satellite communications system operating under the DVB-RCS standard. Nevertheless, by tracking and removing carrier frequency offset, the invention improves communication synchronization even in situations when increasing the return channel transmission power alone may not be successful. This situation may occur, for example, during rain fade conditions or other circumstances that increase or cause fluctuations in the carrier frequency offset.
In addition, signal distortion indicators, such as carrier frequency offset candidates, processed by embodiments of the present invention are preferably received from a particular embodiment of a signal distortion estimator as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/938,299 entitled “Hybrid Frequency Offset Estimator,” which is incorporated herein by reference. Nevertheless, it should be appreciated that the signal distortion indicators could be received from any other suitable type of device. Further, the signal distortion estimator, such as a hybrid frequency offset estimator, and the JSD may be integrated into a single piece of equipment or they may be distributed. For example, the signal distortion estimator may be located on a satellite as on-board-processing (OBP) equipment, whereas the JSD may be located in ground-based receiver configured as customer premises equipment (CPE). Of course, any other division of data processing functionality may be deployed to suit a particular application.
It should also be appreciated that carrier phase and frequency synchronization is but one kind of synchronization, and that turbo decoding is but one kind of decoding scheme that may be applied to burst signals. Thus, the particular architecture described, while presented as applied to a DVB-RCS system using these technologies, is not limited to DVB-RCS and has application in other systems faced with the same or similar types of problems. Also, the invention can be applied to any type of iterative decoding principle but is not limited to turbo decoding nor to any particular type of turbo decoding. The method described can be used for different types of coding; likewise, while the embodiment discussed is that of a carrier synchronization, this again is but one part of “synchronization,” and the idea can also be generalized so that for any particular part of synchronization that is lacking the necessary performance, the joint collaboration between decoding and synchronization of this invention can be equally applied.
Also, regardless of the type of synchronization and signals being decoded, the method taught does apply to burst-mode signals in every instance. For example, an embodiment of the invention may be applied to a continuous mode of data transmission. The principles of the invention taught herein with respect to burst-mode signals may also find application to other types of transmissions and the described method and structure is not to be taken as necessarily limiting in this regard. Nevertheless, it should also be appreciated that the problem sought to be overcome by the invention occurs when there are very short observations of the signal, which occurs with a TDMA burst-mode type of signal. This is when joint synchronization and decoding come into the picture most acutely.
As shown in the embodiments described below, the carrier frequency offset estimator module and the JSD module conveniently interface at the output of the frequency offset estimator module, which typically outputs several candidate values for the carrier frequency offset. The number of candidates produced by the carrier frequency offset estimator could be any number the designer chooses, realizing that the system complexity grows with an increase in this number. Three candidates are used in the exemplary embodiments. However, any number of candidates could produced depending on the particular application of the invention.
Referring now to the figures, in which like numerals refer to like elements throughout the several figures,
The DVB-RCS standard specifies the characteristics of the return channel communications 50, which are in multi-frequency time division multiple access (MF-TDMA) burst-mode packet format using quadrature phase shift key (QPSK). data modulation. The encoded data is preferably decoded using turbo decoding techniques, which are well known in the field of satellite communications. In this system, the present invention may be embodied as a frequency offset estimator within the return channel receiver 60. The challenge is to reliably determine the carrier frequency offset in return channel signal 50, and thereby allow the return channel receiver 60 maintain synchronism with the return channel.
In particular, the objective includes meting the typical DVB-RCS packet loss criteria of 1×10−5 (less than one packet is lost per hundred-thousand burst signals) and 1×10−7 (less than 1 packet is lost per ten million packet transmissions), as appropriate, without having to increase the return channel transmission power of the terminal 40. This objective becomes increasingly challenging as the signal-to-noise ratio decreases (i.e., the return channel signal 50 becomes increasingly faint). The faint return signal problem can be compounded when conditions cause the carrier frequency offset fluctuate, which can occur, for example, during fluctuating cloud and rain fade conditions.
As illustrated in
Step 512 is followed by step 514, in which the JSD applies decision aided synchronization to the input signal by using the selected signal distortion indicator to synchronize to the input signal. Step 514 is followed by step 516, in which the JSD applies a first iteration of decode processing to the input signal. Step 516 is followed by step 518, in which the JSD obtains an indication of decoding success for the decode processing. The JSD then loops through steps 514 through 518 for a sufficient number of iterations to complete the decode processing. Steps 514 through 518 are also referred to jointly as “decision aided synchronization and decoding” to indicate an indication of decoding success is used to synchronize to the input signal and decode the modulating data carried by the input signal.,
Step 612 is followed by step 614, in which the JSD 500 produces corrected channel observations by applying decision aided phase tracking to the input signal using the select carrier frequency offset candidate to synchronize to modified and initialized carrier observations. Step 614 is followed by step 616, in which the JSD 500 applies a first iteration of decode processing to the corrected channel observations. Step 616 is followed by step 618, in which the JSD 500 obtains an indication of decoding success for the decode processing. In this embodiment, these are the LLR values produced by the decoder 1504 shown in
The joint synchronizer and decoder 500 is described in detail below, whereas the hybrid frequency offset estimator 400 is described in commonly owned and concurrently filed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/938,299 entitled “Hybrid Frequency offset estimator,” which is incorporated herein by reference. As noted previously, cooperative operation with the hybrid frequency offset estimator 400 is one particular application of the joint synchronizer and decoder 500, which could alternatively obtain its input candidates from any suitable device.
The channel modifier 1102a receives an associated signal distortion indicator (candidate-A) and the channel observations Z′(n) 34. The signal distortion indicator (candidate-A) is a potential indicator of signal distortion in the channel observations Z′(n) 34, which typically modulates an input carrier signal. The channel modifier 1102a produces modified channel observations by removing potential signal distortion from the channel observations Z′(n) 34 using the signal distortion indicator (candidate-A). In this manner, the modified channel observations represent a test of the effectiveness of the signal distortion indicator (candidate-A) for use in removing signal distortion from the channel observations Z′(n) 34. That is, a subsequent comparison of the success of the several signal distortion indicator candidates in removing signal distortion from the channel observations Z′(n) 34 is used to select a most likely candidate for removing signal distortion from the channel observations Z′(n) 34.
The channel modifier 1102a passes the modified channel observations to the synchronization processor 1104a, which produces corrected channel observations by synchronizing the modified channel observations. Typically, the synchronization process involves phase tracking, timing tracking, amplitude tracking or another tracking function appropriate for the modulation technique employed in the channel observations Z′(n) 34. The synchronization processor 1104a then passes the corrected channel observations to the partial decoder 1106a, which decodes the corrected channel observations to obtain decoded data bits and an indication of decoding success. In particular, the partial decoder 1106a is typically a soft-input-soft-output iterative decode processor designed to perform decode processing through a number of iterations, for example ten iterations. However, the partial decoder 1106a only performs a small percentage of these iterations, for example one to three iterations, sufficient to obtain an indication of decoding success. Complete decode processing is not typically performed for each processing branch at this stage.
The partial decoder 1106a then passes the indication of decoding success for the first processing branch to a branch selector 1108. The synchronization processor 1104a also passes the corrected channel observations to the branch selector 1108. Each processing branch does the same, thereby providing the branch selector 1108 with the indication of decoding success and the corrected channel observations from each processing branch. The branch selector 1108 then selects a most likely branch corresponding to the most likely candidate for the signal distortion indicator based on a comparison of the indications of decoding success for the several processing branches.
The candidate selection process described above is referred to as “decision aided candidate selection” to indicate that the indications of decoding success for the several processing branches have been used to select a most likely processing branch and associated signal distortion indicator. Once the most likely processing branch has been selected, the branch selector 1108 passes the corrected channel observations and the indication of decoding success for the selected branch to an iterative processor 1110, which decodes the corrected channel observations to obtain the encoded data bits.
It should be noted that each individual processing branch shown in
The iterative processor 1110 typically implements a soft-input-soft-output decoding algorithm, such as a turbo decoding algorithm, several types of which are well known in the field of signal processing. Preferably, the iterative processor 1110 also implements decision aided synchronization and decoding, in which an indication of decoding success is used in the synchronization process. This type of decision aided synchronization and decoding is not conventional, and represents an improvement associated with the JSD according to present invention.
The corrected channel observations are passed to the decoder 1504, which computes the decoded bits 38 as well as indication of decoder success 1506. The decoder 1504 is typically a soft-input-soft-output iterative decode processor designed to perform decode processing through a number of iterations, for example ten iterations. However, the decoder 1504 typically only performs a small fraction of these iterations, for example one to three iterations, sufficient to obtain an indication of decoding success 1506.
In second and subsequent iterations of the iterative processor, the indication of decoder success 1506 is passed to the synchronization processor 1502.
The JSD 500 includes three parallel processing branches, a first branch associated with a first carrier frequency offset (candidate-A), a second branch associated with a second carrier frequency offset (candidate-B) and a third branch associated with a third carrier frequency offset (candidate-C). The first branch includes a frequency corrector 1202a, an initial phase estimator and corrector 1204a, a phase tracking module 1205a, and a partial decoder 1206a. The second branch includes a frequency corrector 1202b, an initial phase estimator and corrector 1204b, a phase tracking module 1205b, and a partial decoder 1206b. The third branch includes a frequency corrector 1202c, an initial phase estimator and corrector 1204c, a phase tracking module 1205c, and a partial decoder 1206c. Because each branch operates in the same manner except that the associated carrier frequency offset candidate is different, only the first branch will be described in detail.
The frequency corrector 1202a receives an associated carrier frequency offset (candidate-A) from the hybrid carrier frequency estimator 300 shown on
The frequency corrector 1202a produces modified channel observations by removing the carrier frequency offset (candidate-A) from the channel observations Z′(n) 34. In this manner, the modified channel observations represent a test of the effectiveness of “candidate-A” for use in removing carrier frequency offset from the channel observations Z′(n) 34. That is, a subsequent comparison of the success of the several candidates in removing carrier frequency offset from the channel observations Z′(n) 34 is used to identify a most likely candidate that correctly represents the carrier frequency offset in the channel observations Z′(n) 34. The frequency corrector 1202a is well known in the field of signal processing, and will not be descried further in this specification.
The channel modifier 1202a passes the modified channel observations to the initial phase estimator and corrector 1204a, which adjusts the phase of the modified channel observations in accordance with an initial phase estimate. In other words, the tracking process is initialized by the initial phase estimator 1204a. This module ensures that the channel observations are initialized in such a way that the phase offset is near zero at the start of the sequence of channel observations Z′(n). The initial phase estimator and corrector 1204a is well known in the field of signal processing, and will not be descried further in this specification. The initial phase estimator and corrector 1204a passes the initialized and modified channel observations to the phase tracking module 1205a, which tracks the phase of the initialized and modified channel observations to produce phase corrected channel observations. Although the phase tracking module 1205a is well known in the field of signal processing, a typical block diagram for this module is shown in
The phase tracking module 1205a then passes the phase corrected channel observations to the partial decoder 1206a, which demodulates the phase corrected channel observations to obtain decoded data bits and an indication of decoding success. In this instance, the indication of decoding success is represented by log-likelihood ratios (LLRs) produced by the partial decoder 1206a using a soft-input-soft-output turbo decoding algorithm. Specifically, the partial decoder 1206a produces one LLR for each symbol modulating the channel observations Z′(n) 34, and the LLRs for a complete data packet are processed together on a per-packet basis. It should be appreciated that the partial decoder 1206a is an. iterative decode processor designed to perform a turbo decoding algorithm through a number of iterations, for example ten iterations. However, the partial decoder 1206a only performs a small percentage of these iterations, for example one to three iterations, sufficient to obtain suitable LLRs for the data packet being processed. Complete decode processing is not typically performed for each processing branch at this stage.
The partial decoder 1206a then passes the LLRs for the first processing branch to a branch selector 1208. The phase tracking module 1204a also passes the phase corrected channel observations to the branch selector 1208. Each processing branch does the same, thereby providing the branch selector 1208 with the LLRs and the phase corrected channel observations from each: processing branch. The branch selector 1208 then selects a most likely branch corresponding to the most likely carrier frequency offset candidate based on a comparison of the LLRs for the several processing branches. Specifically, the absolute values of the LLRs for the data packet being processed are averaged, and the branch selector 1208 selects the carrier frequency offset candidate producing the largest averaged absolute values of the LLRs for the packet as the most likely candidate.
The candidate selection process described above is referred to as “decision aided carrier frequency estimation” to indicate that the indications of decoding success for the several processing branches have been used to select a most likely processing branch and associated carrier frequency offset. Once the most likely processing branch has been selected, the branch selector 1208 passes the phase corrected channel observations and the LLRs for the selected branch to an iterative processor 1210, which decodes the phase corrected channel observations to obtain the encoded data bits. The iterative processor 1210 is described in detail below with reference to
The hard decision module 1302 passes the hard decision QPSK phase orientation to a complex conjugate module 1304, which computes the complex conjugate of the hard decision QPSK phase orientation. The modified and initialized channel observations are then multiplied by the complex conjugate of the hard decision QPSK phase orientation. This removes the QPSK modulation from the modified and initialized channel observations, leaving only a phasor representing the phase difference between the modified and initialized channel observations and the hard decision QPSK phase orientation. This phase difference represents a detected phase error in the modified and initialized channel observations. This detected phase error is then fed to an argument processor 1306, which determines the phase angle of the detected phase error. The phase angle of the detected phase error is then passed to a low pass filter 1308 to remove noise. The result is a phase tracking parameter (i.e., a particular example of a synchronization parameter) representing the phase angle of the detected phase error in the modified and initialized channel observations is then provided as an output of the phase tracking module 1205a.
This phase tracking parameter is also fed back for error correction. Specifically, a phasor corresponding to a negative or canceling complement of the phase angle of the detected phase error is determined by a sin/cos lookup table 1310, and this phasor is then multiplied by the modified and initialized channel observations to remove the detected phase error from the modified and initialized channel observations. This multiplication process results in the phase corrected channel observation, which is also an output of the phase tracking module 1205a. As noted previously, this phase tracking process well known in the field of signal processing.
In the first iteration of the decoder 1206a-c, pre-set LLR values representing the absence of prior knowledge about the information contained in the packet are passed to the decoder for the first component code 1408, through de-interleaver 1404. The decoder for the first component code 1408 computes improved LLR values for the systematic bits of the packet, using a computational technique well known in the signal processing industry. The improved LLR values are then passed as input to the decoder for the second component code 1412, but are passed through interleaver 1410a in order to match the encoding order of the second component code. The decoder for the second component code 1412 computes improved log-likelihood ratios for the systematic bits of the packet, using a computational technique well known in the signal processing industry.
The LLRs computed by the second decoder 1412 are output to the branch selector 1208. They are also provided as input to the decoder for the first component code 1408 in the subsequent iteration. The input to the first decoder 1408 is passed through de-interleaver 1404, in order to match the order of encoding in the first component code. The number of iterations performed for each decoder 1206a-c is an application-dependent design parameter.
The decoder 1504 processes the corrected channel observations and the LLR values to extract the decoded bits 38 through an iterative decoding process, which is similar to the iterative process described with reference to
More specifically, the decoder assisted phase tracker 1502 includes a switch 1603 that supplies symbols from the initialized and modified channel observations carrying systematic bits to the soft decision aided phase tracker 1602. The switch 1603 also supplies symbols from the initialized and modified channel observations carrying parity bits to the decision aided phase tracking module 1604. The decoder assisted phase tracker 1502 also includes a switch 1605 that supplies corrected channel observations for the systematic bits from the soft decision aided phase tracker 1602 as an output. The switch 1605 also supplies corrected channel observations for the parity bits from the decision aided phase tracking module 1604 as an output. In other words, the corrected channel observations for the systematic bits are produced by the soft decision aided phase tracker 1602, whereas the corrected channel observations for the parity bits are produced by the decision aided phase tracking module 1604.
In addition, the soft decision aided phase tracker 1602 includes a hard decision and quality estimate module 1606 that receives the LLR values 1506 from the decoder 1504. The hard decision and quality estimate module 1606 assigns a “hard value” corresponding to QPSK phase orientation to each symbol based on the LLR values. Although there may be uncertainly in the hard decision at this point, a specific hard decision is made based on the best information currently available (i.e., at the present iteration) to facilitate the phase tracking process. The LLR value also indicates a likelihood or quality estimate for this hard decision. As noted previously, the LLR values typically increase with successive iterations indicating increasing likelihood or quality of the hard decisions.
The hard decision and quality estimate are then fed to a modulation removal module 1608, which also receives the initialized and modified channel observations carrying the systematic bits. The modulation removal module 1608 then removes the modulation from the initialized and modified channel observations through multiplication with the complex conjugate of the associated hard decision. The result of this process is a phase error, which the modulation removal module 1608 scales by the associated quality estimate to produce a modulation-free resultant signal. This signal is then passed to a sliding average module 1610, which computes a sliding average of the modulation-free resultant signal, typically over a block of 50 symbols, to produce a phase tracking parameter representative of the phase error in the initialized and modified channel observations for the systematic bits. The phase tracking parameter is then passed to a phase corrector 1612, which removes the phase error represented by the phase tracking parameter from the initialized and modified channel observations for the systematic bits to compute the phase corrected channel observations for the systematic bits.
As noted previously, the symbols carrying the parity bits are passed to the decision aided phase tracking module 1604. The phase tracking parameter is also fed from the sliding average module 1610 of the soft decision aided phase tracker 1602 to the decision aided phase tracking module 1604. The decision aided phase tracking module 1604 also includes a switch 1607 that switches between the phase tracking parameter received from the soft decision aided phase tracker 1602 for the first symbol and an internally-generated phase tracking parameter for subsequent symbols.
In view of the foregoing, it will be appreciated that present invention provides an improved joint synchronizer and decoder that is configured to implement decision aided candidate selection and decision aided synchronization and decoding. More specifically, the invention select a carrier frequency offset by selecting among a number of candidates for this parameter based on an indication of decoding success. The invention may also implement decision aided phase tracking based on an indication of decoding success. It should be understood that the foregoing relates only to the exemplary embodiments of the present invention, and that numerous changes may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the following claims.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10924259, | Oct 31 2018 | Maxlinear, Inc | Method and apparatus for binary signal reception, clock data recovery, and soft decoding |
| 7706481, | Aug 20 2004 | Broadcom Corporation | Method and system for improving reception in wired and wireless receivers through redundancy and iterative processing |
| 9008094, | Sep 27 2011 | Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute | Data transmission and reception method and apparatus robust against phase noise for high efficiency satellite transmission |
| 9252813, | May 27 2009 | NOVELSAT LTD | Iterative decoding of LDPC codes with iteration scheduling |
| 9264182, | Sep 13 2012 | Novelsat Ltd.; NOVELSAT LTD | Iterative receiver loop |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 6459888, | Sep 30 1998 | Skyworks Solutions, Inc | Method of estimating carrier frequency in a digital mobile communications system through multiple hypotheses performed on the received signal |
| 6798593, | Mar 23 2000 | Sony Corporation | Method and apparatus for reproducing data and method and apparatus for recording and/or reproducing data |
| 6976203, | Sep 30 2002 | Seagate Technology LLC | Turbo decoder architecture with mini-trellis SISO |
| 6993070, | May 16 2000 | France Telecom | Method and system of iteratively detecting and decoding received symbols coupled with re-estimation of the coefficients of the transmission channel |
| 6996762, | Apr 24 2001 | WISCOM TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Methods and apparatus of signal demodulation combining with different modulations and coding for wireless communications |
| 7016440, | Aug 16 2000 | Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, The | Iterative MMSE equalization-decoder soft information exchange decoding method and device |
| 7058878, | Mar 25 2002 | Fujitsu Limited | Data processing apparatus using iterative decoding |
| 7165210, | Jan 21 2002 | Nokia Corporation | Method and apparatus for producing path metrics in trellis |
| 7286517, | Oct 04 2001 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Multi-user detection method for a receiver in a MC-CDMA telecommunication system |
| 7333571, | Apr 23 2001 | California Institute of Technology | Reduced complexity coding system using iterative decoding |
| 20010043641, | |||
| 20020046371, | |||
| 20020110206, | |||
| 20020154712, | |||
| 20030023920, | |||
| 20030053557, | |||
| 20030072291, | |||
| 20030093753, | |||
| 20030154441, | |||
| 20030182617, | |||
| 20040064777, | |||
| 20040105396, | |||
| 20040148556, | |||
| 20050018794, | |||
| WO100636, | |||
| WO9924622, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Sep 10 2004 | Advantech Advanced Microwave Technologies, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Sep 10 2004 | EUP, LARS | EMS SATELLITE NETWORKS | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015787 | /0871 | |
| Sep 10 2004 | SHEIKHOLESLAMI ALAGHA, NADER | EMS SATELLITE NETWORKS | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015787 | /0884 | |
| Dec 10 2004 | EMS Technologies Canada, LTD | Bank of America, National Association | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 015778 | /0208 | |
| Mar 31 2005 | EMS SATELLITE NETWORKS | EMS Technologies Canada Ltd | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016475 | /0795 | |
| Mar 09 2006 | EMS Technologies Canada, LTD | ADVANTECH SATELLITE NETWORKS INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017783 | /0275 | |
| Jun 21 2013 | ADVANTECH WIRELESS INC | HSBC BANK CANADA | NOTICE OF SECURITY INTEREST | 030668 | /0530 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Nov 06 2012 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Apr 14 2017 | M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Apr 14 2017 | M2555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Small Entity. |
| Nov 25 2020 | M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Sep 22 2012 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 22 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 22 2013 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Sep 22 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Sep 22 2016 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 22 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 22 2017 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Sep 22 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Sep 22 2020 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Mar 22 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Sep 22 2021 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Sep 22 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |