An output level stabilization circuit being an output level stabilization circuit for a cml circuit, the output level stabilization circuit includes: a replica circuit constituted of transistors respectively having the same characteristics as one of differential-pair transistors of the cml circuit and a current source transistor; a comparison circuit which compares an output of the replica circuit with a reference voltage and supplies the comparison result as a control voltage for the current source transistor of the replica circuit; and a variable impedance circuit arranged between the output of the replica circuit and an input of the comparison circuit.
|
1. An output level stabilization circuit for a cml circuit, the output level stabilization circuit comprising:
a replica circuit comprising of transistors respectively having the same characteristics as one of differential-pair transistors of the cml circuit and a current source transistor;
a comparison circuit which compares an output of the replica circuit with a reference voltage and supplies the comparison result as a control voltage for the current source transistor of the replica circuit;
a variable impedance circuit arranged between the output of the replica circuit and an input of the comparison circuit;
a noise detection unit which detects a noise in the comparison result; and
a control unit which variably controls the impedance of the variable impedance circuit in response to the noise detection.
2. The output level stabilization circuit according to
3. The output level stabilization circuit according to
4. A cml circuit comprising an output level stabilization circuit according to
|
This application is based upon and claims the benefit of priority from Japanese patent application No. 2007-056500 filed on Mar. 7, 2007, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to an output stabilization circuit and CML circuit using the same, and more particularly to an output level stabilization technique for suppressing variations in output level of a CML circuit caused by noises.
2. Related Art
In recent years, the operating frequency of LSI has been raised; and in the high-speed signal transmission in LSI, analog signals have been increasingly used. Particularly, there have been used numerous analog high-speed transmission systems using circuits based on CML (Current Mode Logic). CML circuits have been disclosed, for example, in Japanese Utility Model Laid-Open No. 2-73827 (Patent Document 1) and Japanese Patent Laid-Open No. 7-307658 (Patent Document 2).
Referring to
The operation of the above CML circuit has been disclosed in Patent Documents 1 and 2, so this is generally known. Hence, an explanation thereof is omitted.
The above CML circuit 1 has a problem that, when noises are added to reference voltage Vcs, the output level becomes unstable, causing increased jitter and thus lowering the quality of signal transmission. Accordingly, when a CML circuit is used, tolerance to noise is required. In order to satisfy this requirement, there has been proposed a circuit illustrated in
Referring to
Reference voltage Vcs is applied to the gate of the transistor T4; this reference voltage is generated by an analog comparator 21. Drain output Vrep of the transistor T5 of the replica circuit is applied via a feedback resistor R4 to a positive-phase input of this comparator 21. Voltage division output Vref obtained through voltage division between voltage divider resistors R5 and R6 is applied to a negative-phase input of the comparator 21.
This voltage division output Vref is set identical to the low level output voltage of the CML circuit 1; thus, the resistors R5 and R6 are set to have a resistance value ratio therebetween so that the voltage division output Vref is identical to the low level output voltage of the CML circuit 1. Drain voltage Vrep of the transistor T5 being the output of the replica circuit is identical to the output voltage of the CML circuit 1 when the input (IN or INB) of the CML circuit 1 has a high level.
The operation of the circuit of
Here, when an open-loop gain between the comparator 21 and replica circuit is Go, a closed-loop gain Gc of a feedback circuit from the replica circuit to the comparator 21 is expressed as Gc=Go/(1+Go). Thus, the gain of the comparator 21 is raised to maximize Go, so that Gc is made closest to “1”, whereby the difference between output Vrep of the CML circuit 1 and voltage division output Vref obtained through the resistors R5 and R6 can be reduced, allowing stabilizing output Vrep.
The operation in which high-frequency noise is taken into consideration will be described. When an external high-frequency noise inputs, and when the above described closed-loop high-frequency gain of the feedback circuit exceeds “1”, the high-frequency noise is amplified. As described above, the gain of the comparator 21 has been raised in view of the low-frequency operation, so the gain of the comparator 21 cannot be lowered. Thus, a resistor R4 is inserted in the feedback circuit section, so that only the gain of the whole closed loop is lowered.
In this way, when the resistor R4 is inserted in the feedback circuit, the closed-loop gain can be lowered to suppress the noise amplification. However, the phase of high-frequency noise varies depending on the resistance value, and resonance may occur according to the amplitude of this variation. This indicates that there exists a particular frequency which corresponds to a given resistance value and constitutes a weak point regarding noise amplification. Effects caused by such a frequency must be eliminated.
An exemplary object of the invention is to provide an output level stabilization circuit for a CML circuit which can modify a resonant frequency of noise to suppress its effects caused by the frequency, allowing stabilizing the output level, and also provide a CML circuit using the output level stabilization circuit.
The output level stabilization circuit according to an exemplary aspect of the invention includes: a replica circuit constituted of transistors respectively having the same characteristics as one of differential-pair transistors of the CML circuit and a current source transistor; a comparison circuit which compares an output of the replica circuit with a reference voltage and supplies the comparison result as a control voltage for the current source transistor of the replica circuit; and a variable impedance circuit arranged between the output of the replica circuit and an input of the comparison circuit.
The CML circuit according to an exemplary aspect of the invention includes the above output level stabilization circuit, and the comparison result is supplied to a control input of the current source transistor of the CML circuit.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
In order to control insertion of these resistors R41 to R4n in the feedback loop, MOS transistors T61 to T6n are connected in series to the resistors R41 to R4n, respectively. Control signals are supplied to respective gates of the transistors T61 to T6n from a control unit 10, and using these control signals, the transistors T61 to T6n can be on-off controlled.
The other circuit constituent elements are identical to those of
As described above, when a resistor is inserted in the feedback section, the closed-loop gain can be lowered to suppress noise amplification. However, the phase of high-frequency noise varies depending on the resistance value of that resistor, and resonance may occur according to the amplitude of this variation. More specifically, there exists a particular frequency which corresponds to a given resistance value and constitutes a weak point regarding noise amplification.
Thus, according to the present embodiment, in the feedback resistor (R4 in
With the above configuration, when a resonance with respect to high-frequency noise occurs at a given resistance value, the on/off states of the transistors T61 to T6n are changed using the control signals to change the resistance value, thereby allowing prevention of occurrence of the resonance. For example, assume that, while the transistors T61 and T62 are turned on and thus the resistors R41 and R42 are inserted in the feedback loop, the output level of the CML circuit 1 becomes unstable due to the occurrence of a noise. In this state, when the transistor T63 is turned on and the resistor R43 is additionally inserted in the feedback loop, the resistance value of the feedback loop changes, so that the resonant state with respect to this noise can be prevented.
In the present example, the resistance value of the feedback resistor is changed using multiple resistors and multiple transistors. However, it will easily be appreciated that the resistance value can be changed using a variable resistor.
When a noise is detected by the noise detection unit 3, it is determined that a resonance has occurred. Accordingly, a n-th digit counter value of the counter 4 is incremented or decremented (increased or decreased), and based on the n-th digit counter value, the transistors T61 to T6n are subjected again to on/off control. As a result, the resistance value of the feedback resistor is changed to prevent the resonant state. Thus, adverse effects caused by resonant noises can be automatically prevented.
By way of example, assume that the transistors T61 and T62 are turned on by the n-bit output of the counter 4 and thus the resistors R41 and R42 are inserted in the feedback loop. In this state, when a noise occurs, this is detected by the noise detection unit 3, and the resultant detection pulse increments the counter 4. Then, the n-bit output changes, so that, in addition to the transistors T61 and T62, the transistor T63 is also turned on. Accordingly, in addition to the resistors R41 and R42, the resistor R43 is inserted in the feedback loop, whereby the resonant state is prevented.
In the above described embodiments, MOS transistors are used as transistors. However, in general, FET devices or bipolar devices can be used. Also, it is apparent that, as the transistors T61 to T6n which control insertion of the feedback resistors R41 to R4n in the feedback loop, any switching device can be used as long as it performs a switching operation according to an external control signal.
An exemplary advantage according to the invention is that, since noise resonant frequency can be modified, effects caused by noise can be suppressed and thus the output level can be stabilized.
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to exemplary embodiments thereof, the invention is not limited to these embodiments. It will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as defined by the claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7425847, | Feb 03 2006 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Input buffer with optimal biasing and method thereof |
JP273827, | |||
JP7307658, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 01 2008 | MATSUSHIMA, YUSUKE | NEC Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020517 | /0528 | |
Feb 15 2008 | NEC Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Mar 07 2013 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Apr 13 2017 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 14 2021 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 29 2021 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 27 2012 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 27 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 27 2013 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 27 2015 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 27 2016 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 27 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 27 2017 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 27 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 27 2020 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 27 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 27 2021 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 27 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |