A method for determining the exhaust pressure (Pr) of a turbocharged internal combustion engine, including a solenoid by-pass valve for the exhaust gas, characterized in that an exhaust pressure (Pi) is determined as a function of the inlet air flow to the engine, (Ar), the engine speed (Rr) and the degree of opening of the solenoid exhaust by-pass valve (Tr), by interpolation from a reference map having exhaust gas pressure values (Pc) for given inlet air flow values (Ac), the engine speed (Rc) and the degree of opening of the solenoid exhaust by-pass valve (Tc), and the exhaust pressure determined by the interpolation (Pi) is corrected as a function of ambient pressure values (Pa, Po).
|
1. A method of determining the exhaust pressure (Pr) of a turbocharged internal combustion engine comprising a wastegate, characterized in that
an exhaust pressure (Pi) is determined, as a function of the engine intake air flow rate (Ar), of the engine speed (Rr) and of the degree of wastegate opening (Tr), by an interpolation from a reference map comprising exhaust pressure values (Pc) for defined values of the intake air flow rate (Ac), of the engine speed (Rc) and of the degree of wastegate opening (Tc),
the exhaust pressure determined by the interpolation (Pi) is corrected, as a function of the ambient pressure prevailing during the determination of the exhaust pressure (Pa) and of the ambient pressure prevailing during the production of the map (Po), according to the formula which follows:
in which Pr is the corrected exhaust pressure, Pi is the exhaust pressure determined by the interpolation, Po is the ambient pressure prevailing during the production of the map, Pa is the ambient pressure prevailing during the determination of the exhaust pressure, and K is a corrective factor which is specific to the type of engine for which the map was produced and which is predetermined on a test bench by calibrating measurements at different ambient pressures.
2. The method as claimed in
3. The method as claimed in
4. The method as claimed in
5. The method as claimed in
6. A method of regulating a turbocharged internal combustion engine as a function of the exhaust pressure, characterized in that the exhaust pressure is determined as claimed in
7. The method as claimed in
8. The method as claimed in
9. The method as claimed in
10. A method of regulating a turbocharged internal combustion engine as a function of the exhaust pressure, characterized in that the exhaust pressure is determined as claimed in
11. A method of regulating a turbocharged internal combustion engine as a function of the exhaust pressure, characterized in that the exhaust pressure is determined as claimed in
12. A method of regulating a turbocharged internal combustion engine as a function of the exhaust pressure, characterized in that the exhaust pressure is determined as claimed in
13. A method of regulating a turbocharged internal combustion engine as a function of the exhaust pressure, characterized in that the exhaust pressure is determined as claimed in
|
The invention relates to a method of determining the exhaust pressure of a turbocharged internal combustion engine, and to a method of regulating such an engine.
The exhaust pressure is an important piece of data for regulating a turbocharged internal combustion engine in order to take account of the back pressures. In the prior art, this pressure is determined by means of a pressure sensor arranged in the exhaust manifold. However, given its position, the sensor must be able to withstand high temperatures, thereby making its manufacture more complex and its cost more substantial.
A problem that the present invention aims to solve is that of determining the exhaust pressure without using a sensor in the exhaust manifold.
According to the invention, the exhaust pressure is determined, as a function of the engine intake air flow rate, of the engine speed and of the degree of opening of the solenoid valve used for bypassing the exhaust gases (commonly referred to as a wastegate), by an interpolation from a reference map comprising exhaust pressure values for defined values of the intake air flow rate, of the engine speed and of the degree of wastegate opening.
This exhaust pressure determined by interpolation is then corrected, as a function of the ambient pressure prevailing during the determination of the exhaust pressure and of the ambient pressure prevailing during the production of the map, according to the formula which follows.
Thus, according to the invention, the pressure sensor in the exhaust is eliminated, the pressure being determined from an interpolation performed by a computer using a reference map established on a test bench.
Other particular features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description of the example illustrated in the appended figures.
According to the invention, a reference map is established for a given type of engine (internal combustion engine). This map is produced from an engine on a test bench. The map is obtained by carrying out a number of exhaust pressure measurements Pc, each exhaust measurement being conducted for a defined value of the intake air flow rate Ac, of the engine speed Rc and of the degree of wastegate opening Tc. The degree of opening is between 0 and 100% and it represents the position of greater or lesser opening of the wastegate.
In the present example, the degree of wastegate opening Tc is represented by the value of the wastegate control.
In the map illustrated in
In
During the use of the given type of engine, the exhaust pressure Pi is determined, as a function of the actual engine intake air flow rate Ar, of the actual engine speed Rr and of the actual value of the wastegate control Tr, by an interpolation from the reference map produced for this type of engine. Preferably, the interpolation used is a linear interpolation.
Of course, to ensure that this interpolation gives a correct value, the number of intake air flow rate values Ac, engine speed values Rc and wastegate control values Tc required to establish the map must be sufficient. Thus, for the wastegate control Tc, three or four values (hence three or four layers) are sufficient to obtain a reliable linear interpolation.
The value of the exhaust pressure Pi thus determined by interpolation can then be used to regulate the turbocharged engine.
A correction can be applied to the exhaust pressure determined by the interpolation Pi in order to take account of the ambient pressure Pa, more precisely to take account of the difference between the ambient pressure prevailing during the production of the map Po and that prevailing during the use of the engine Pa.
The exhaust pressure Pi can thus be corrected according to the formula which follows:
in which K is a corrective factor, Pr is the corrected exhaust pressure, Pi is the exhaust pressure determined by the interpolation, Po is the ambient pressure prevailing during the production of the map, and Pa is the ambient pressure prevailing during the determination of the exhaust pressure, Po, Pa and K being expressed in mbar.
The corrective factor K, specific to one type of engine, is determined on a test bench by calibrating measurements at different ambient pressures. As can be seen from
In
As can be seen from
It would be possible to apply other corrections in order to further improve the reliability of the determination of the exhaust pressure by computation. These other corrective factors may be the air/fuel ratio of the admitted mixture, the ignition advance delay and the injection interruptions.
It would be possible to produce a map using the intake airflow Ac expressed in kg/h (along the x axis), the wastegate control Tc expressed as a percentage of the duty ratio (along the y axis), each layer thus representing a value of the engine speed, and the z axis representing the exhaust pressure Pi. However, the use of such units gives rise to a more complex calibration process.
It would also be possible, to ensure that the wastegate control is even more representative of the actual position of this wastegate, to use the applied control less the adaptation corrections so as to take the drifts and the aging of the wastegate correctly into account. This prevents any drift of the modeled exhaust pressure. The adaptation of the control thus makes it possible to maintain a constant position, which remains represented in the map by the non-corrected control.
It would also be possible to use the actual position of the wastegate instead of the control of this wastegate. However, it is then necessary to use a sensor to determine this position.
Rouphael, Roger, Carbonne, Laure, Cremona, Patrick
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6715287, | Dec 28 1999 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method and device for controlling an internal combustion engine that is provided with an air system |
DE4214648, | |||
EP1221544, | |||
EP1416138, | |||
JP2000356162, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 11 2005 | Continental Automotive France | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 13 2007 | CARBONNE, LAURE | Siemens VDO Automotive | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019039 | /0279 | |
Feb 13 2007 | CREMONA, PATRICK | Siemens VDO Automotive | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019039 | /0279 | |
Mar 02 2007 | ROUPHAEL, ROGER | Siemens VDO Automotive | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019039 | /0279 | |
Dec 06 2007 | Siemens VDO Automotive | Continental Automotive France | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023737 | /0579 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 19 2010 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 14 2013 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 15 2017 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 18 2021 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 23 2013 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 23 2013 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 23 2014 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 23 2016 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 23 2017 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 23 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 23 2018 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 23 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 23 2021 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 23 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 23 2022 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 23 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |