A process for preparing membranes formed by (per) fluorinated ionomeric electrolytes salified with the lithium ion, comprising the following steps:

Patent
   7704639
Priority
Apr 26 2002
Filed
Apr 25 2003
Issued
Apr 27 2010
Expiry
Oct 25 2023
Extension
183 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
0
14
EXPIRED
1. A process to prepare ionomeric membranes formed by (per) fluorinated ionomeric electrolyte polymers salified with a lithium ion, comprising the following steps:
a) obtaining of (per) fluorinated polymer membranes, containing —SO2F groups pendent with respect to the main chain;
b) partial or complete salification of the (per) fluorinated polymer membranes containing —SO2F groups with basic lithium compounds and final water washing; and
c) swelling and contemporaneous drying of the membranes by dipping in a heterogeneous biphasic system consisting of:
(1) a dipolar aprotic organic solvent or a mixture of dipolar aprotic organic solvents, and
(2) molecular sieves dispersed therein which are inert with respect to the solvent and the membranes;
and wherein any swelling step in the process occurs in the absence of protic solvents.
2. The process according to claim 1, carried out in a discontinuous or continuous way.
3. The process according to claim 1, wherein step c) is optionally repeated when the process is discontinuous.
4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the polymers used to prepare the ionomeric membranes are copolymers of:
(1) a fluoroolefin containing a fluorosulphonic group, having formula:

CF2═CF−(OCF2CFR)aO—CF2CFR′SO2F  (I)
wherein
R and R′ are independently: F, Cl, or a C1-C3 perfluoroalkyl;
a is zero or 1; and
(2) one or more fluorinated olefinic comonomers,
(3) optionally with non fluorinated olefinic comonomers.
5. The process according to claim 4, wherein the fluoroolefin of formula (I) is a vinylether of formula CF2═CFOCF2CF2SO2F.
6. The process according to claim 4, wherein the fluorinated olefinic comonomers are selected from the group consisting of:
C2-C8 (per) fluoroolefins;
C2-C8 hydrogenated fluoroolefins, selected from the group consisting of:
vinyl fluoride (VF), vinylidene fluoride (VDF), trifluoroethylene, hexafluoroisobutene, and a CH2═CH-Rf perfluoroalkylethylene, wherein Rf is a C1-C6 perfluoroalkyl;
C2-C8 chloro- and/or bromo- and/or iodo-fluoroolefins;
CF2═CFORf (per) fluoroalkylvinylethers (PAVE), wherein Rf is a C1-C6 (per) fluoroalkyl; and
CF2═CFOX (per) fluoro-oxyalkylvinylethers, wherein X is selected from the group consisting of: C1-C12 alkyl, C1-C12 oxyalkyl, and C1-C12 (per) fluoro-oxyalky having one or more ether groups.
7. The process according to claim 4, wherein the non fluorinated olefinic comonomers are C2-C8 olefins.
8. The process according to claim 4, wherein the polymers used to prepare the ionomeric membranes are copolymers containing a fluoroolefin of formula (I) in an amount in percent by moles, lower than or equal to 50% by moles.
9. The process according to claim 4, wherein the (per) fluorinated polymers of the membranes are tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) copolymers with the sulphonic fluoroolefin of formula (I).
10. The process according to claim 1, wherein the (per)fluorinated polymers of the membranes have an equivalent weight in the range of 380-1,600.
11. The process according to claim 1, wherein in step a) the membranes have a thickness of 0.05-1 millimeter.
12. The process according to claim 1, wherein in step b), the salification step is carried out at temperatures from 50° C. to 100° C., and wherein step b) comprises transforming the polymers in the lithium form (—SO3Li) with aqueous LiOH or alkaline inorganic lithium salts.
13. The process according to claim 12, wherein in step b), the ionomeric polymers forming the membranes are completely salified.
14. The process according to claim 12, wherein in step b), the final washing with water is carried out at temperatures from 20° C. to 80° C. until neutral reaction of the washing waters.
15. The process according to claim 1, wherein step c) is carried out under the following conditions:
environment having controlled humidity, lower than 5%;
the solvent used for the swelling/drying process steps is an organic carbonate; and
the temperature is from 20° C. to 70° C.
16. The process according to claim 15, wherein the duration of step c) of is from 2 to 24 hours, and step c) ends when the swelling, and the residual water amount in the membrane, satisfy the following conditions:
the membrane swelling, in percent by weight increase with respect to the sample of the non-swollen membrane, treated under vacuum at 130° C. at 10−3 mbar(102 Pa) for 8 hours, is higher than 150% when the membrane is formed by a perfluorinated ionomer having an equivalent weight of 750, formed by tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and the comonomer having formula:

CF2═CFOCF2CF2SO2F; and
the residual water amount, determined by Karl Fischer equipment, is lower than 400 ppm.
17. The process according to claim 6 wherein:
C2-C8 (per) fluoroolefins are selected from the group consisting of: tetrafluoroethylene (TFE) and hexafluoropropene (HFP);
C2-C8 chloro- and/or bromo- and/or iodo-fluoroolefins are selected from the group consisting of: chlorotrifluoroethylene (CTFE) and bromotrifluoroethylene;
Rf in CF2═CFORf is selected from the group consisting of: trifluoromethyl, bromodifluoromethyl and heptafluoropropyl; and
X in CF2═CFOX is perfluoro-2-propoxy-propyl.
18. The process according to claim 7, wherein the non fluorinated olefinic comonomers are ethylene or propylene.
19. The process according to claim 8, wherein the polymers used to prepare the ionomeric membranes are copolymers containing a fluoroolefin of formula (I) in an amount in percent by moles lower than or equal to 30%.
20. The process according to claim 10, wherein the (per)fluorinated polymers of the membranes have an equivalent weight in the range of 550-1,200.
21. The process according to claim 11, wherein in step a), the membranes have a thickness of 0.1-0.3 millimeters.
22. The process according to claim 12 wherein in step b), the salification is carried out at temperatures from 70° C. to 90° C. and the lithium salts are lithium carbonate or bicarbonate.
23. The process according to claim 14, wherein in step b), the final washing with water is carried out at temperatures from 20° C. to 50° C.
24. The process according to claim 15, wherein in step c), the humidity is lower than 0.1%; the organic carbonates are selected from the group consisting of ethylene carbonate, propylene carbonate, dimethylcarbonate and mixtures thereof; and the temperature is from 20° C. to 50° C.
25. The process according to claim 24, wherein in step c), the humidity is lower than 0.001%.
26. The process according to claim 16, wherein the duration of step c) is from 4 to 12 hours and step c) ends when the swelling and the residual water amount in the membrane satisfy the following conditions:
the membrane swelling, in percent by weight increase with respect to the sample of the non-swollen membrane, treated under vacuum at 130° C. at 10−3 mbar (102 Pa) for 8 hours, can reach even values of about 210% when the membrane is formed by a perfluorinated ionomer having an equivalent weight of 750, formed by TFE and the comonomer having formula:

CF2═CFOCF2CF2SO2F; and
the residual water amount, determined by Karl Fischer equipment, is from about 30 ppm to about 300 ppm.
27. The process according to claim 1, wherein the molecular sieves having 3 Å sizes.

The present invention relates to a process for preparing membranes formed by (per)fluorinated ionomeric electrolyte polymers characterized by improved conductivity, and the membranes obtainable by said process to be used in rechargeable lithium batteries.

More specifically the invention relates to a process for preparing membranes formed by (per)fluorinated ionomeric polymers.

It is known in the prior art the use, under the form of film compositions, of electrolyte polymers to form the separatory membrane of a cell of a rechargeable battery. A separatory membrane constituted by said electrolyte polymers, comprises a polymeric matrix which is ionically conductive due to the incorporation therein of an organic solution of a dissociable lithium salt which supplies the ionic mobility.

A polymeric matrix suitable to the use in a cell of a rechargeable battery should have, besides a high conductivity, the following properties:

For this purpose electrolyte polymers based on polyethylenoxide (PEO) wherein the crystalline polymer is swollen by the electrolyte solution, have been developed. The films obtained from said electrolyte polymer have good conductivity but poor electrochemical stability.

An alternative kind of electrolyte polymer has been suggested in U.S. Pat. No. 5,296,318, wherein copolymers based on vinylidene fluoride (VDF) are used to prepare polymeric membranes of rechargeable lithium batteries. In particular in the above patent copolymers are described containing VDF in an amount comprised between 75% and 92% by weight, and hexafluoropropene (HFP) in an amount comprised between 8% and 25% by weight. Said copolymers allow the preparation of polymeric electrolytes formed by the copolymer itself and a solvent, for example a mixture of ethylencarbonate/propylencarbonate (EC/PC), containing a lithium salt. The polymeric membrane of said composition can be obtained by casting, dissolving the swollen polymer with a mixture of ethylcarbonate and propylencarbonate in which the lithium salt is dissolved, in a solvent, for example tetrahydrofuran (THF). Then the solution coating on a substratum takes place and the solvent (THF) is evaporated. In this way a stable polymeric film of about 100 μm having ionic conductivity in the range 10−4-10−3 S/cm−1, is obtained.

In U.S. Pat. No. 5,418,091 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,000 a method for preparing polymeric membranes always containing a VDF copolymer with HFP, and a method for preparing the battery itself, are described. In particular the polymeric membranes are prepared by an extraction/activation process whereby a suitable plasticizer is added to the polymer in an amount comprised between 20% and 70% by weight. In this step the electrolyte polymer results in a non-activated and the storage is possible of the battery components which use the electrolyte polymer. In a non-activated form it contains said plasticizer, for example dibutylphthalate, and the activation takes place by the plasticizer extraction from the polymer and its substitution with the electrolyte solution formed by the EC/PC mixture containing the lithium salt.

The films obtained from the electrolyte polymer compositions described in said patents have a limited retention of the high boiling solvent containing the lithium salt and therefore a reduced ionic conductivity.

In the mentioned patents the assembly of the whole battery is also described by applying the extraction/activation process also in the preparation of the anode and of the cathode. The two electrodes are obtained by depositing, for example by casting, the polymer containing the plasticizer on the metal substrata. The separator is then placed between the two electrodes and successively the polymeric films present on all the battery components are subjected to a melting process, such for example the coextrusion, which favours the adhesion between the separator and the electrodes. The battery is then activated by the plasticizer substitution with the electrolyte solution containing the lithium salt. An example of preparation of said batteries according to the above patents is described by J. M. Tarascon et al. in “Solid State Ionic” 86-88 (1996) pages 49-54.

The electrolyte polymer is therefore a system formed by the polymer, solvents and/or plasticizers, such ethylencarbonate, propylencarbonate, etc. and by lithium salts, as LiSO3CF3, LiN(SO2CF3)2, LiPF6, etc.

The drawback shown by the electrolyte polymers VDF and HFP based onf the prior art is that they have not a high ionic conductivity; furthermore, they do not show a suitable thermal stability.

More particularly rechargeable lithium batteries can be divided in two classes, those using respectively a liquid electrolyte or a polymeric electrolyte.

Liquid electrolytes have the advantage to show a high conductivity. Batteries using liquid electrolytes, differently from those using solid electrolytes, need a porous separator between the electrodes, but can be subjected to electrolyte losses. This represents a drawback which can compromise the battery functioning.

Ionomeric polymeric electrolytes are also known which, compared to liquid electrolytes, have the advantage that the conductivity is due only to the lithium ion. Therefore in the batteries with polymeric electrolyte the polarization and oxidation phenomena, typical of batteries with liquid electrolyte, are reduced.

Ionomeric electrolytes can be obtained with a very reduced thickness so as to obviate the drawback of the lower conductivity.

It is known that during the lithium battery preparation the water must be removed from the electrolyte and from all the internal battery components, whereby the various battery parts must be prepared and assembled in anhydrous environment. It is known that the water presence in the electrolyte or in the electrodes forming the lithium battery can produce an increase of the ionic conductivity. However the water present during the battery charging can develop by electrolysis gases which increase the internal pressure so compromising the correct battery functioning. Depending on the residual water amount, pressure values such to cause structural failures can also be reached. Therefore it is important to minimize the water traces.

Patent application WO 00/63,998 describes perfluorinated ionomeric solid electrolytes for lithium batteries and the method for obtaining them. According to the process of said patent the ionomeric electrolyte is initially converted under the form of lithium salt and subsequently dried under vacuum. Then the swelling with a mixture of solvents follows comprising both the ion carrier solvent (plasticizer), such for example organic carbonates or even partially fluorinated ethers, for example CH3OC4F9, and a volatile co-solvent having a high impregnation capability, for example methanol, ethanol, THF. From the examples of said patent application it results that the membrane drying step is carried out under vacuum at 110° C. for one night, and that some days are necessary to carry out with the carrier solvent the membrane impregnation until obtaining the maximum swelling (60-110% of increase by weight with respect to the initial swelling). By drying an ionomeric membrane under vacuum at 110° C., even for a higher time than that reported in the examples of said patent application, high values of residual water and low conductivities are obtained (see comparative Examples).

As said, the presence of water in the lithium battery electrolyte negatively affects the battery functioning.

Patent application WO 98/20,573 describes ionomeric perfluorinated ionomers salified in the lithium form and the method to obtain them. According to the process of said patent application the ionomeric polymers in the SO2F form are salified with aqueous LiOH in admixture with DMSO, or other organic solvents, then washed with distilled water and dried by hot treatment under vacuum for a period from 24 to 98 hours. Alternatively anhydrification can be hot carried out under anhydrous nitrogen flow. Subsequently a swelling step with aprotic solvents is carried out. According to said patent application conductivity values of the polymeric electrolytes higher than 10−4 S/cm are obtained when two selling steps are carried out, using two different anhydrous solvents, or mixtures of anhydrous solvents, for each swelling step. The duration of each single swelling step ranges from 24 hours to two weeks and in the first step also a protic solvent, for example methanol, can be used. The use of a protic solvent implies that its successive removal must be as complete as possible, since in the patent application it is stated that the protic solvent in traces in the polymer can compromise the duration and the efficiency of the lithium battery. With the methods used in this patent application to dry the membrane there are substantially the same drawbacks, as regards the residual water amount in the polymeric electrolyte, of the method of the above patent application WO 00/63,998. Besides, the membranes do not show a high conductivity if two swelling solvents are not used (see comparative Examples).

Patent application WO 00/41,292 describes fluorinated ionomers obtained by using VDF as comonomer. The membrane preparation comprises: a) the VDF polymerization with the sulphonic monomer and the subsequent salification, carried out by using a mixture of alkaline metal carbonates and methanol, optionally containing dimethylcarbonate, b) filtration and obtaining of the membrane by casting. The membrane dehydration is carried out for example by heating under vacuum, then the swelling is carried out with preferably aprotic solvents. The ionomeric membrane conductivity according to the Examples of said patent application is of the order of 10−4 S/cm. The process of said patent has the drawback to use, as salification solvent, methanol, whose presence even in traces in the ionomeric polymer, as said in WO 98/20,573, can compromise the duration and the efficiency of the lithium battery. Higher conductivity values are obtained when water is used as swelling solvent. However; as above said, the water must be removed by the drying process. Therefore this conductivity value is not significant.

The patent application WO 01/03,230 describes sulphonic ionomeric electrolytic compositions, based on vinylidene fluoride, wherein dimethyl succinate is used as solvent or co-solvent. In the examples a process to prepare an ionomeric membrane is described wherein the ionomeric polymer, obtained in the form of powder, is salified by treatment with a mixture of lithium carbonate in methanol. Successively both the residual water and the methanol are removed from the powder by azeotropic distillation with toluene. The ionomeric polymer is recovered by filtration and dried under vacuum. In anhydrous environment, to the powder, the calculated amount of ethylene carbonate to obtain the polymer swelling is added. The membrane is obtained by pressure moluding of the swollen polymer.

Said process has the drawback to comprise numerous steps. Besides, in the salification step methanol is used. This leads to the above drawbacks. To eliminate said solvent the azeotropic distillation with toluene is carried out, thus introducing a further step.

Patent application WO 00/24,709 describes the preparation of (per)fluorinated sulphonic ionomers, obtained from the TFE or VDF copolymerization with a not vinylether sulphonic perfluoroolefin. The ionomeric membranes are obtained by treating the polymers according to various processes. For example, the polymers are salified in a mixture of aqueous lithium carbonate/methanol and then moulded in films, dried under heating and subsequently swollen in ethylene carbonate. The process described in this patent application substantially shows the same above drawbacks of the prior art processes.

The need was felt to have available a process for the preparation of an ionomeric electrolyte to be used in lithium batteries, simplified with respect to those described in the prior art and which in particular did not use methanol, to avoid the above drawbacks, and being such to allow the obtaining of substantially anhydrous ionomeric electrolytes, to avoid the inconveniences due to the water presence, and having furthermore an improved conductivity.

The Applicant has surprisingly and unexpectedly found a process which solves the above technical problem.

An object of the present invention is a process to prepare membranes formed by (per)fluorinated ionomeric electrolytes salified with the lithium ion, comprising the following steps:

The invention process can be carried out in discontinuous or in continuous.

Step c) can optionally be repeated when the process is in continuous.

The step a) membranes are generally obtained by moulding, or extrusion or film casting.

The polymers used to prepare the ionomeric membranes of the present invention are (per)fluorinated polymers containing SO2F groups. Said polymers are copolymers of a fluoroolefin containing a fluorosulphonic group, having formula:
CF2═CF—(OCF2CFR)aO—CF2CFR′SO2F  (I)

wherein

R and R′ are independently: F, Cl, C1-C3 perfluoroalkyl;

a is zero or 1;

with one or more fluorinated olefinic comonomers and optionally also with non fluorinated olefinic comonomers.

Preferably the formula (I) fluoroolefin is the vinylether of formula CF2═CFOCF2CF2SO2F.

Among the fluorinated olefinic comonomers the following are mentioned:

Optional olefinic comonomers which can be copolymerized are C2-C8 non fluorinated olefins as ethylene, propylene.

A process for the preparation of fluorinated polymers can be carried out by aqueous emulsion polymerization according to well known methods of the prior art, in the presence of a suitable radical initiator. This can be selected for example from the following: inorganic peroxides (for example alkaline metal or ammonium persulphates, perphosphates, perborates or percarbonates), optionally in combination with ferrous, cupreous or silver salts or of other easily oxidizable metals; organic peroxides (for example disuccinylperoxide, terbutylhydroperoxide, diterbutylperoxide); azocompounds (see U.S. Pat. No. 2,515,628 and U.S. Pat. No. 2,520,338, herein incorporated by reference). It is also possible to use organic or inorganic redox systems, as ammonium persulphate/sodium sulphite, hydrogen peroxide/aminoiminomethan-sulphinic acid. The used initiators can be selected also from those described in the European patent application 02004181.0.

In the reaction medium surfactants of various type can also be present, among which the fluorinated surfactants of formula:
Rf—XaM+
are particularly preferred, wherein Rf is a C5-C16 (per)fluoroalkyl chain or a (per)fluoropolyoxyalkyl chain, Xa is —COO or —SO3, M+ is selected among H+, NH4+ or an alkaline metal ion. Among the most commonly used surfactants, we remember: ammonium perfluorooctanoate, (per)fluoropolyoxyalkylenes ended with one or more carboxylic groups, etc.

During the polymerization chain transfer agents can be added, such for example those described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,766,190, herein incorporated by reference.

In particular the process in emulsion is carried out in the presence of a microemulsion, as described in EP 1,172,382, herein incorporated by reference.

The process for the preparation of the fluorinated polymers according to the present invention can be carried out also by polymerization in organic solvent as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,864,006 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,182,342, herein incorporated by reference. The organic solvent is selected from the group comprising chlorofluoro-carbons, perfluoropolyethers, hydrofluorocarbons and hydrofluoroethers.

As said, the polymers used to prepare the ionomeric membranes according to the present invention process are copolymers containing a fluoroolefin of formula (I) in an amount in per cent by moles, lower than or equal to 50% by moles, more preferably lower than or equal to 30% by moles.

The preferred polymers are TFE copolymers with the sulphonic fluoroolefin of formula (I).

The (per)fluorinated polymers of the present invention membranes generally have equivalent weight in the range 380-1,600 preferably 550-1,200.

In step a) the sulphonic polymers are under the form of membranes having thickness of 0.05-1 millimeter, preferably 0.1-0.3 millimeters. The membranes can be obtained by moulding. Alternatively they can be obtained by polymer extrusion, or by film casting of a sulphonic polymer solution in perfluorinated solvents, such for example C5-C10 perfluoroalkanes and perfluoropolyethers.

In step b) the salification step is carried out at temperatures from 50° C. to 100° C., preferably from 70° C. to 90° C., transforming the above polymers in the lithium form (—SO3Li) using for example aqueous LiOH or alkaline inorganic lithium salts as lithium carbonate or bicarbonate. The conversion of the —SO2F groups into —SO3Li is followed by infrared spectrophotometry by monitoring the decrease, or thr disappearance, of the peak corresponding to the group (—SO2F) (1470 cm−1).

In step b) the ionomeric polymers forming the membranes are completely or partially salified with lithium ions, preferably they are completely salified.

The final washing with water in step b) is carried out at temperatures from 20° C. to 80° C., preferably from 20° C. to 50° C., until neutral reaction of the washing waters.

Step c) is preferably carried out under the following conditions:

The step c) duration is generally from 2 to 24 hours, preferably from 4 to 12 hours, and is completed when the swelling, and the residual water amount in the membrane, satisfy the conditions indicated hereinafter:

The drying agents used in step c) are insoluble in the used solvent and are selected from the inorganic salts capable to absorb hydration water, for example sodium sulphate, alkaline metal oxides and hydroxides, alkaline-earth oxides and hydroxides, preferably the water sequestrant as the molecular sieves, still more preferably molecular sieves having 3 Å sizes.

The skilled man in the field is capable to determine the ratio between the amount by weight of anhydrifying agents to be used with respect to the membrane weight.

Step c) can be repeated when the process is carried out in discontinuous to obtain very reduced values of residual water. To obtain extremely low water contents, it is possible to operate with a two or more steps process substituting, after some hours, both the solvent and the drying agent with fresh solvent and drying agent. After the first substitution of the solvent and drying agent contents lower than 50 ppm are obtained. These results can be more easily obtained by a continuous process.

The heterogeneous biphasic system components used in step c) can be separately regenerated using conventional processes.

A further object of the present invention is constituted by swollen membranes, obtainable according to the present invention process, formed by the ionomeric polymers as above, said membranes having the following properties:

The present invention process has the advantage to contemporaneously carry out the membrane drying and swelling. In particular in the drying step c), as above said, the content in residual water is reduced by a very simple method. Besides, the simultaneous swelling is high and takes place in short times, also in absence of protic solvents as methanol. It has been found by the Applicant that the combination of said two steps is advantageous since the process duration is reduced compared with the duration of those of the prior art and surprisingly membranes having higher conductivities and a lower content in residual water are obtained with respect to the membranes dried by dry heating under vacuum or under anhydrous gas flow, as described in the prior art.

The conductivity values of the membranes obtained with the present application process are high, of the order of 10−4 S/cm or higher, even in the presence of a sole swelling solvent. According to the present invention process it is therefore possible to avoid the use of active hydrogen containing cosolvents with respect to lithium (ex. methanol, N-methyl-formamide). The conductivity values can reach values of the order of 10−3 S/cm.

Furthermore the drying according to the present invention process takes place at temperatures lower than those of the prior art and in this step a service solvent of the battery is used or a mixture of said solvents. This represents an advantage since the membranes prepared by the present invention process are directly usable in lithium batteries.

Further advantages of the present invention process are the following:

A further advantage of the process according to the present invention is that most of the process steps are not carried out under anhydrous conditions, therefore its carrying out on the industrial scale results extremely simplified.

Lithium batteries comprising the membranes prepared with the present invention process can be prepared by assembling in anhydrous environment the active electrodes, previously dried, with the membranes swollen in the working solvent or mixture of solvents (plasticizer), obtained as above described.

The following Examples illustrate the invention without limiting the scope thereof.

The analaytical determiantions mentioned hereinafter are carried out by using a dry box under nitrogen atmosphere.

Specific Conductivity Determination

The conductivity determination has been carried out by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique, by using the Solartron® 1250 instrument, in the frequency range 65 kHz-100 mHz. From the resistance value on the real axis Re, the specific conductivity σ is determined by the relation:

σ = 1 R e A
wherein 1=distance between the electrodes; A=area of the electrodes; 1/A represents the geometric constant of the measurement cell. The conductivity determination is carried out by using two 310 steel electrodes.

The used electrodes are circular with a diameter of 1 cm.

Membrane Swelling Value

The membrane swelling is determined by difference of weighings with respect to the initial weight.

Water Content Determination

The water content is determined by analysis with Karl Fischer equipment.

Anodic Stability Determination (Decomposition Potential) of an Ionomeric Membrane

The anodic stability of the ionomeric membrane is determined by evaluating by electrochemical polarization measurements, in a cell formed by a lithium cathode, by an anode constituted by stainless steel and by the membrane interposed between the electrodes. The cell is of the type:
Li/membrane/electrode

At the cell electrodes a potential difference rising from 3.2 V to 6 V, with a scanning rate of 100 μVs−1 is applied. Reporting in a graph in abscisses the difference of potential and in ordinates the current density in mA/cm2, the decomposition potential is determined on the abscisses in correspondence with the anodic current value which significantly differs from the initial value (bottom current). For example, an increase of the anodic current between 1/10 and ⅕ with respect to the initial value is generally considered significant.

The electrodes used are circular with a diameter of 1 cm.

The following reactants are introduced into a 5 litre autoclave:

Under stirring at 630 rpm, the mixture in the autoclave has been heated to 75° C. 40 ml of an aqueous solution at a concentration 15 g/l of ammonium persulphate (APS) are then fed. The pressure is brought to 12 atm ass (12.12×105 Pa) by introducing TFE. The reaction starts after 1 minute. The pressure is maintained at 12 atm ass by feeding TFE. During the polymerization an amount equal to 22.8 ml of the sulphonic monomer of formula CF2═CF—O—CF2CF2—SO2F are added every 6.5 g of fed TFE. The total amount of TFE fed to the reactor is 1,000 g. The reaction is stopped after 70 minutes from the start, by decreasing the stirring, cooling the reactor and venting the TFE. The produced latex has a solid content of 32% by weight. The latex is coagulated by freezing and the obtained coagulum washed with demineralized water until neutrality of the washing waters. The polymer is then dried at 150° C.

The copolymer composition, determined by NMR, is the following: 82% by moles of TFE and 18% by moles of sulphonic monomer, corresponding to an equivalent weight of 750 g/eq.

Membrane preparation in the SO2F form and subsequent salification in the SO3Li form.

A) Membrane Preparation

About 11 g of the copolymer obtained in Example 1, containing TFE and CF2═CFOCF2CF2SO2F, equivalent weight of 750 g/eq, are placed in a PTFE template (20×20 cm) having a thickness ranging from 0.2 to 0.3 mm, between two PTFE films put on two sample-holder steel plates. The template is placed in press equipped with water circulation cooling system at the temperature of 250° C. Then a first step lasting 10 minutes is carried out, formed by a preheating step (9 min 30 s) followed by degassing operations (30 s). In the second step one operates in the press at a pressure of 9.8 MPa (100 kg/cm2) for 1 minute at 250° C. Successively, maintaining the same pressure, the temperature is set at 150° C. for 10 minutes; lastly the specimen is cooled to room temperature by water flowing.

B) Salification and Washing

The membrane as prepared in the pervious step A), is salified by dipping for 6 hours at the temperature of 80° C. in about 500 ml of aqueous lithium hydroxide, obtained by dissolving 40 g of LiOH.H2O in 500 ml of deionized water. The so obtained membrane is washed more times with deionized water at room temperature until neutrality of the washing waters. Finally the membrane is kept in deionized water for the use. The increase by weight per cent with respect to the membrane dried under vacuum at 130° C. at 10−3 mbar (102 Pa) for 8 hours is 60%. The analysis by infrared spectrophotometry (1470 cm−1) shows that all the SO2F groups have been converted into SO3Li groups.

Swelling by one pass in solvent and drying process of the membrane prepared in Example 2.

One rectangle (1 cm×2 cm) of the membrane prepared in Example 2 dripped and blottered with filter paper has been transferred into a 100 ml flask containing 40 ml of anhydrous propylencarbonate (PC) (battery grade), and about 5 g of molecular sieves (3 Å 4-8 mesh—Aldrich®) previously activated under vacuum at 250° C. for three hours. The flask is sealed and introduced in dry-box. The membrane is left in contact with the anhydrous PC in the presence of the molecular sieves for 5 hours. Lastly the membrane is recovered and the water content is determined, resulting to be 250 ppm. The increase by weight per cent of the membrane, calculated with respect to the hydrated membrane prepared in Example 2 is 68%. The increase by weight pet cent with respect to the membrane dried under vacuum is 168%. The so obtained swollen membrane is malleable and can be easily bent without cracks.

Swelling by two passes in solvents and drying process of the membrane prepared in Example 2.

The procedure described in Example 3 is repeated and at the end the membrane is likewise treated, by substituting both the solvent and the molecular sieves placed in the flask. Lastly the membrane has been recovered and the water content, resulted of 33 ppm, has been determined. The membrane swelling with respect to the membrane dried under vacuum is 204% and with respect to the initial wet membrane 90%. The so obtained swollen membrane is malleable and can be easily bent without cracks appearing in the membrane.

This Example shows that by repeating the swelling and the drying process, it is possible to reduce the amount of residual water to some tens of ppm.

Swelling and drying processn by one step in solvent of the membrane prepared in Example 2 and membrane specific conductivity determination.

From the membrane prepared in Example 2 a disk having a diameter of 1 cm is cut. The process described in Example 3 is repeated. The weight increase with respect to the membrane dried under vacuum is 160% and with respect to the initial wet membrane 63%. The specific conductivity measured at room temperature is 1×10−3 S/cm.

This Example shows that with the membranes prepared according to the present invention process high conductivies are obtained even using in the swelling step only one aprotic solvent in absence of protic solvents.

Swelling and drying process by two passes in solvent of the membrane prepared in Example 2 and membrane specific conductivity determination.

From the membrane prepared in Example 2 a disk having a diameter of 1 cm is cut. The process described in Example 4 is repeated. The weight increase with respect to the membrane dried under vacuum is 190% and with respect to the initial wet membrane 82%. The specific conductivity measured at room temperature is 9×10−4 S/cm.

Membrane drying process by heating under vacuum for 64 hours at 110° C. according to the prior art.

One rectangle (1 cm×2 cm) of the membrane prepared in Example 2 is put under vacuum at 10−3 mbar (102 Pa) at 110° C. for 64 hours according to WO 98/20,573. The residual water content in the membrane specimen is 400 ppm. The membrane after the drying process becomes fragile and is easily cracked.

This Example shows that by using a drying process of the prior art the residual water content is higher than that of the process according to the present invention.

Drying process by heating under vacuum according to WO 98/20,573, membrane swelling and swelling determination at different conditioning times.

One proceeds as in Example 7 (comparative) Lastly the membrane is swollen as described in Example 3.

The percent weight increase of the membrane hot dried under vacuum at different conditioning times by dipping in PC is reported in Table 1. The so dried and swollen membrane remains fragile and can be easily cracked.

The data reported in Table 1 show that by using the processes of the prior art high swelling values are not obtained.

The specific conductivity measured after 10 days of the membrane conditioning by dipping in PC results 10−6 S/cm.

Drying process by heating in an anhydrous nitrogen circulation stove at 98° C. for 100 hours

One rectangle (1 cm×2 cm) of the membrane prepared in Example 2 is put in an anhydrous nitrogen circulation stove at 98° C. for 100 hours according to WO 98/20,573. The membrane water content has resulted 610 ppm. The membrane dried with the aforesaid process results fragile and can be easily cracked.

The same comments of Example 7 (comparative) are repeated for this Example.

Drying process by heating in an anhydrous nitrogen circulation stove at 98° C. for 100 hours, subsequent membrane swelling according to Example 3 and specific conductivity determination.

The membrane drying process is carried out as described in Example 9. The subsequent swelling is carried out as in Example 3, by using the same PC amount according to the process described therein. The per cent weight increase with respect to the weight of the dehydrated membrane in nitrogen atmosphere and the respective specific conductivities at the various conditioning times in the PC solvent are reported in Table 2. The so dried and swollen membrane remains fragile and can easily be cracked.

The membrane swelling data reported in Table 2 substantially confirm those of the previous Table 1, obtained with a different drying process. The specific conductivities at the various conditioning times are very low.

Polymerization (TFE copolymer and CF2═CFOCF2CF2SO2F perfluoro(3-oxa-4 pentene-1-sulphonylfluoride), obtaining of an ionomeric polymer having equivalent weight of 880 g/eq.), molding, membrane salification and final washing wuith water

The following reactants are introduced into a 22 litre autoclave:

Under stirring at 540 rpm, the mixture in the autoclave has been heated to 60° C. 150 ml of an aqueous solution at a concentration 3 g/l of potassium persulphate (KPS) are then fed. The pressure is brought to 12 atm ass (12.12×105 Pa) by introducing TFE. The reaction starts after 1 minute. The pressure is maintained at 12 atm ass by feeding TFE. During the polymerization an amount equal to 185 g of the sulphonic monomer of formula CF2−═CF—O—CF2CF2—SO2F are added every 200 g of fed TFE. The total amount of TFE fed to the reactor is 4,000 g. The reaction is stopped after 490 minutes from the start, by decreasing the stirring, cooling the reactor and venting the TFE. The produced latex has a solid content of 27.5 by weight. The latex is coagulated by freezing and the obtained coagulum washed with demineralized water until neutrality of the washing waters. The polymer is then dried at 150° C.

To transform the —SO2F groups into —SO3H groups the obtained polymer is in sequence treated for 16 hours at 80° C. in KOH 10%, washed until neutrality, treated for 24 hours with HCl 20% and washed until neutrality. The polymer is titrated with NaOH to determine the ionomer equivalent weight, which results of 880 g/eq.

The membrane having thickness 0.2 mm is obtained as described in Example 2. The subsequent salification steps with LiOH and final washing with water are carried out according to the modalities reported in the same Example 2. The membrane is weighed and kept in deionized water for the use.

Swelling by one pass in solvent, drying process of the membrane prepared in Example 11 and determination of the specific conductivity.

Example 1 is repeated except that the contact time in anhydrous PC in the presence of molecular sieves at the temperature of 40° C. is prolonged to 8 hours.

The membrane water content has resulted 280 ppm. The per cent weight increase of the membrane with respect to the dried membrane is 130% and with respect to the initial wet membrane is 90%. The so obtained swollen membrane is malleable and can easily be bent without cracks. The specific conductivity measured at room temperature is 1×10−4 S/cm.

Drying process in an anhydrous nitrogen circulation stove at 100° C. for 100 hours according to the prior art, subsequent swolling as in Example 12 of the membrane prepared in Example 11: determination of the specific conductivity.

The membrane is put in an anhydrous nitrogen circulation stove for 100 hours. The so dried specimen is introducrd into a dry box by dipping in anhydrous PC as described in Example 12. The membrane swelling (per cent by weight increase with respect to the weight of the membrane hot dehydrated under vacuum) is 30%. The specific conductivity determined at room temperature is 2×10−5 S/cm.

This comparative Example confirms that, by carrying out the drying step according to the prior art, high swelling and specific conductivity values of the membranes are not obtained.

Specific conductivity determination of a swollen membrane in absence of molecular sieves after dehydration at 80° C. for 8 hours.

A rectangle (1 cm×2 cm) of the membrane prepared in Example 2 is put under vacuum at 10−3 mbar at 80° C. for 8 hours. The specimen is introduced into the dry box. The residual water content has resulted 1,300 ppm. The so dried specimen is swollen in anhydrous PC in absence of molecular sieves, by dipping the specimen in the anhydrous PC for 24 hours.

The membrane swelling, determined as per cent by weight increase with respect to the weight of the dehydrated membrane under vacuum at 80° C. is 167%.

The specific conductivity determined at room temperature on a disk of the swollen membrane having a diameter of 1 cm is 2.10−6 cm.

The Example shows that in the presence of water it is possible to obtain a membrane swelling comparable with that obtained with the present invention process, but that the conductivity remains very low. Therefore a high swelling is not a sufficient condition to have good conductivity.

Anodic stability determination of the membrane prepared in Example 4.

The determination is carried out according to the above described method. The decomposition potential value determined at 40° C. is of 5.2 V.

TABLE 1
Example 8 (comparative) - drying process by heating under
vacuum at 110° C. for 64 h and swelling according to Example 3:
conditioning times and corresponding increase by weight
of the membrane
Conditioning time Swelling
(days) (% by weight)
2 1
3 4
7 13
8 18
9 25
15 27

TABLE 2
Example 10 (comparative): drying process by heating in a
stove under nitrogen atmosphere and subsequent membrane
swelling using propylen carbonate in the presence of molecular
sieves: conditioning times, increases by weight of
the membrane and specific conductivity
Specific
Conditioning time Swelling conductivity
(days) (% by weight) (S/cm)
2 2 10−8
3 5 8.10−8
7 17 2.10−7
8 18 1.10−6
9 23 1.10−6
15 24 1.10−6

Sanguineti, Aldo, Navarrini, Walter, Scrosati, Bruno, Panero, Stefania

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
2515628,
2520388,
4766190, Oct 12 1985 Daikin Industries Ltd. Novel elastomeric fluoropolymer and preparation thereof
4864006, Jun 26 1986 AUSIMONT S P A Process for the polymerization in aqueous dispersion of fluorinated monomers
5182342, Feb 28 1992 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company; E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Hydrofluorocarbon solvents for fluoromonomer polymerization
5296318, Mar 05 1993 VALENCE TECHNOLOGY NEVADA , INC Rechargeable lithium intercalation battery with hybrid polymeric electrolyte
5418091, Mar 05 1993 VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC DE Polymeric electrolytic cell separator membrane
5456000, Mar 05 1993 VALENCE TECHNOLOGY, INC DE Method of making an electrolyte activatable lithium-ion rechargeable battery cell
6007935, Nov 22 1996 Avestor Limited Partnership Rechargeable lithium anode for polymer electrolyte battery
6033804, Apr 02 1996 E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY Highly conductive ion exchange polymer and process
6096234, Jan 23 1997 SHIN-ETSU CHEMICAL CO , LTD Cross-linked polymer solid electrolyte, method of manufacturing cross-linked solid polymer electrolyte, composite solid electrolyte, and thin solid cell employing composite solid electrolyte
6660828, May 14 2001 OMNOVA Solutions Inc.; OMNOVA SOLUTIONS INC Fluorinated short carbon atom side chain and polar group containing polymer, and flow, or leveling, or wetting agents thereof
EP1172382,
EP1238988,
/////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 25 2003Solvay Solexis S.p.A.(assignment on the face of the patent)
May 28 2003NAVARRINI, WALTERSOLVAY SOLEXIS S P A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0143540213 pdf
May 28 2003PANERO, STEFANIASOLVAY SOLEXIS S P A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0143540213 pdf
May 28 2003SCROSATI, BRUNOSOLVAY SOLEXIS S P A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0143540213 pdf
May 28 2003SANGUINETI, ALDOSOLVAY SOLEXIS S P A ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0143540213 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Jun 24 2010ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Sep 25 2013M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Dec 11 2017REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
May 28 2018EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 27 20134 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2014patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 27 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 27 20178 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2018patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 27 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 27 202112 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20216 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2022patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 27 20242 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)