An integrated pressure and flow ratio control system includes n mass flow controllers mfci (i=1, . . . , n) that each control the flow rate of a fluid fi (i=1, . . . , n) flowing into a processing chamber. These n mass flow controllers are linked together by a digital communication network. One of the mass flow controllers is a master mfc, and the remaining N−1 MFCs are slave MFCs. The master mfc receives a pressure set point and a plurality n of flow ratio set points from a host controller, and communicates these set points to all the slave MFCs. In this way, the pressure in the chamber is maintained at the pressure set point and the flow ratios qi/qT are maintained at the flow ratio set points, where qi is flow rate of the i-th fluid fi, and qT=Q1+q2+ . . . qn is the sum of all n flow rates.

Patent
   7706925
Priority
Jan 10 2007
Filed
Jan 10 2007
Issued
Apr 27 2010
Expiry
May 24 2027
Extension
134 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
17
5
all paid
21. A method of controlling pressure of a processing chamber and flow ratios of a plurality n of fluids fi (i =1, . . . , n) to the processing chamber, the method comprising:
directly connecting a plurality n of mass flow controllers mfci (i =1, . . . , n) between one or more sources of a plurality n of fluids fi (i=1, . . . , n) and a processing chamber that processes the n fluids fi, without an intermediate manifold, wherein the plurality n of mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n) include one master mfc and a plurality (N−1) of slave MFCs;
the master mfc and the slave MFCs maintaining ratios qi/qT(i=1, . . . , n) at flow ratio set points received from a host controller, wherein qi represents flow rate of i-th fluid fi as measured by i-th mass flow controller mfci during flow of fi from the source through the mfci into the processing chamber, and wherein qT represents a sum qT=Q1+. . . +qi+. . . qn of flow rates of all n fluids fi; and
one of the mass flow controllers mfci (i=1, . . . , n) maintaining pressure in the processing chamber at a pressure set point received from the host controller.
17. A pressure and flow ratio control system comprising:
a plurality n of mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n) each configured to receive at an inlet an i-th one of a plurality n of fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n) and to control flow rate of the i-th fluid fifrom the inlet through an outlet of the mfci and directly into a processing chamber configured to process the fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n), without an intermediate manifold, the mass flow controllers including one master mfc and N−1 slave MFCs;
wherein the master mfc is configured to receive from a host controller a pressure set point and a plurality n of flow ratio set points, the master mfc further configured to determine flow ratio set points for each of the N−1 slave MFCs and to communicate said flow ratio set points to the N−1 slave MFCs; and
wherein the N−1 slave MFCs are configured to control the flow rates of the respective fluids qi so as to maintain ratios qi/qT(i=1, . . . , n) at the flow ratio set points received from the master mfc, where qi represents flow rate of the i-th fluid fi, and qT represents a sum qT=Q1+. . . +qi+. . . qn of flow rates of all n individual fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n).
20. A gas processing system comprising:
a chamber configured to process a plurality of fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n); and
a plurality n of mass flow controllers mfci (i=1, . . . , n) each configured to receive at an inlet an i-th one of the plurality of fluids fi (i=1, . . . , n) and to control flow rate of the i-th fluid fifrom the inlet through an outlet of the mfci and directly into the chamber, without an intermediate manifold, the n mass flow controllers mfci (i=1, . . . , n) including one master mfc and a plurality (N−1) of slave MFCs;
wherein the master mfc is configured to receive flow ratio set points from a host controller, and to communicate the flow ratio set points to all the slave MFCs together with one or more command signals, so as to control ratios qi/qT(i=1, . . . , n) at the flow ratio set points, where qirepresents flow rate of the i-th fluid fi, and qT represents a sum qT=Q1+. . . +qi+. . . qn of flow rates of all n individual fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n); and
wherein one of the mass flow controllers mfci (i=1, . . . , n) is a pressure control mfc configured to receive a pressure set point from the host controller and to control pressure in the chamber at the pressure set point.
1. A pressure and flow ratio control system comprising:
a plurality n of mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n) each configured to receive at an inlet an i-th one of a plurality n of fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n) and to control flow rate of the i-th fluid fi from the inlet through an outlet of the mfci and directly into a processing chamber, without an intermediate manifold, the n mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n) including one master mfc and a plurality (N−1) of slave MFCs;
wherein the master mfc is configured to receive flow ratio set points from a host controller, and to communicate the flow ratio set points to all the slave MFCs together with one or more command signals, so as to maintain ratios Qi/qT(i=1, . . . , n) at the flow ratio set points, where qi represents flow rate of the i-th fluid fi, and qT represents a sum qT=Q1+. . . +qi+. . . qn of flow rates of all n individual fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n); and
wherein one of the mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n ) is a pressure control mfc configured to receive a pressure set point from the host controller and to maintain pressure in the chamber at the pressure set point by regulating flow to the processing chamber, and remaining ones of the mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n) are (N−1) flow control MFCs configured to control the flow rates qi so as to maintain the flow ratios qi/qT at the flow ratio set points.
2. The system of claim 1, wherein the pressure control mfc is the master mfc, and the (N−1) flow control MFCs are the (N−1) slave MFCs.
3. The system of claim 1, further comprising a pressure transducer configured to measure actual pressure within the chamber, and wherein the pressure control mfc includes a pressure input and is configured to receive from the pressure transducer at the pressure input a pressure signal representing the measured pressure, and to regulate its flow to the processing chamber so as to control the chamber pressure in response to the pressure signal until the pressure in the chamber reaches the pressure set point.
4. The system of claim 1, wherein the (N−1) flow control MFCs are responsive to the flow ratio set points from the host controller to control flow rate of the respective fluids fi so that the actual flow ratios qi/qT(i=1, . . . , N−1) satisfy the flow ratio set points.
5. The system of claim 1, wherein each one of the (N−1) slave MFCs is configured to measure an actual flow rate of a corresponding one of the fluids fi, and to communicate the actual flow rate to the master mfc.
6. The system of claim 5, wherein the master mfc is further configured to communicate the total flow rate qT to all the slave MFCs.
7. The system of claim 6,
wherein each slave mfc is further configured to compute an actual flow ratio and to report the actual flow ratio to the master mfc; and
wherein the actual flow ratio is a ratio between the actual flow rate and the total flow rate qT received from the master mfc.
8. The system of claim 6, wherein the master mfc is configured to report back to the host controller the actual flow rates and the actual flow ratios received from each slave mfc.
9. The system of claim 8, wherein the master mfc is further configured to report back to the host controller at least one of: the actual chamber pressure; and status information for the system.
10. The system of claim 1, wherein the master mfc is configured to compute the total flow rate qT by summing the flow rates qi (i=1, . . . , n) of the individual fluids fi.
11. The system of claim 1, further comprising a digital communication bus, and wherein the master mfc and the slave MFCs are linked through the digital communication bus and are configured to communicate with each other through the digital communication bus.
12. The system of claim 11, wherein the digital communication bus is connected to a network that comprises at least one of: Ethernet TCP/IP; DeviceNet; CAN (controller Area Network); UDP/IP (User Datagram Protocol/Internet Protocol); DeviceNet; CAN (controller Area Network); RS (Recommended Standard)-232; and RS (Recommended Standard)-485.
13. The system of claim 1, wherein each mass flow controller mfci (i=1, . . . , n) includes:
a flow body Bi(i=1, . . . , n) configured to receive the fluid fi at an inlet and providing a flow path for the fluid fi between the inlet and an outlet of the flow body Bi;
a flow sensor Si (i=1, . . . , n) configured to measure flow rate of the fluid fi as the fluid fi flows from an inlet to an outlet of the mfci; and
a control valve Vi(i=1, . . . , n) configured to regulate flow of the fluid fi at a desired flow rate.
14. The system of claim 13,
wherein the master mfc is further configured to receive one or more further signals from the host controller, the signals comprising at least one of:
a signal requesting for value of valve current in one or more of the valves Vi(i=1, . . . , n) in the mass flow controllers;
a signal requesting diagnostics information from one or more of the plurality of mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n); and
a signal requesting for value of temperature of one or more of the flow bodies Bi(i =1, . . . , n).
15. The system of claim 1, wherein at least one of the fluids fi(i=1, . . . , n) is a gas.
16. The system of claim 1, wherein the number n of the mass flow controllers mfci(i=1, . . . , n) is variable.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein the master mfc is configured to determine the flow set points for each of the N−1 slave MFCs by using a mathematical formula that comprises:
q sp , i = r sp , i r sp , master · q m , master ,
where QHDsp,i represents a flow set point for the i-th flow control mfc;
rsp,i represents the flow ratio set point for the i-th flow control mfc;
rsp,master represents the flow ratio set point for the master mfc; and
qsp,master represents a measured flow rate of the master mfc.
19. The system of claim 17, wherein the master mfc is further configured to regulate flow of a respective one of the fluid Fi through the master mfc to control pressure in the processing chamber so as to maintain the pressure in the processing chamber at the pressure set point received from the host controller.
22. The method of claim 21, wherein the act of maintaining ratios qi/qT(i1, . . . , n) at the flow ratio set points comprises:
the master mfc receiving the flow ratio set points from the host controller and maintaining flow rate of fluid through the master mfc at a respective flow ratio set point; and
the master mfc transmitting the flow ratio set points together with one or more command signals to the slave MFCs, causing the slave MFCs to maintain flow rate of fluid through the slave MFCs at respective flow ratio set points.

In processes such as semiconductor fabrication, precise amounts of gases or other fluids have to be delivered to a processing chamber or other facility. In some applications, a plurality of process gases or fluids may have to be delivered and processed.

In these applications, the flow ratios between the flow rates of the individual fluids and the total flow rate summed over all the fluids have to be maintained at desired set point values. Typically, this may accomplished by using multiple mass flow controllers to control the individual flow rates of each of the fluids. A related variable that needs to be controlled and maintained at a desired set point value is the pressure in the processing chamber. Controlling the flow rates and concentrations of multiple fluid lines, while at the same time maintaining the chamber pressure at a desired value, may be a challenge.

There is a need for systems and methods for controlling in a reliable and efficient manner both the pressure in a processing chamber as well as the flow ratios of multiple fluids that flow into the chamber for processing.

A pressure and flow ratio control system includes a plurality N of mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N). These N mass flow controllers are linked together by a digital communication network. Each mass flow controller is configured to receive at an inlet an i-th one of a plurality N of fluids Fi (i=1, . . . , N), and to control flow rate of the i-th fluid Fi from the inlet through an outlet of the MFCi and onto a processing chamber configured to process the fluids Fi (i=1, . . . , N).

The mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) include one master MFC and N−1 slave MFCs. The master MFC is configured to receive a pressure set point and a plurality N of flow ratio set points from a host controller. The master MFC is further configured to communicate the pressure set point and the flow ratio set points to all the slave MFCs, together with one or more command signals, so as to maintain pressure in the chamber at the pressure set point and so as to maintain ratios Qi/QT (i=1, . . . , N) at the flow ratio set points, where Qi represents flow rate of the i-th fluid Fi, and QT represents a sum QT=Q1+ . . . +Qi+ . . . QN of flow rates of all N individual fluids Fi (i=1, . . . , N).

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an integrated pressure and flow ratio control system in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 illustrates communications between a host controller, a master MFC, and a plurality of slave MFCs, in one exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 illustrates communications between a host controller, a master MFC, and a plurality of slave MFCs, in another exemplary embodiment of the present disclosure.

An integrated pressure and flow ratio control system is disclosed that allows both chamber pressure as well as flow ratios of multiple fluids to be controlled in a cost effective and flexible manner, as the fluids are delivered to and processed in the chamber. The system includes a plurality of mass flow controllers (MFCs) that are linked through a digital communication network. One of the MFCs is a master MFC that communicates with a host controller and transmit commands from the host controller to the remaining MFCs, which are slave or client MFCs.

FIG. 1 schematically illustrates an integrated pressure and flow ratio control system 100 in accordance with one embodiment of the present disclosure. In overview, the system 100 includes a plurality N of mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) that are linked to each other by the digital communication network. The mass flow controllers MFCi are illustrated in FIG. 1 as MFC1, MFC2, . . . , MFCi, . . . , MFCN, and are indicated using reference numerals 110-1, 110-2, . . . , 110-i, . . . , 110-N. The i-th mass flow controller MFCi (110-i) is configured to receive a corresponding i-th fluid Fi (i=1, . . . , N) at an inlet of the MFCi. In other words, MFC1 receives fluid F1, MFC2 receives fluid F2, . . . and MFCN receives fluid FN. The system 100 also includes a pressure transducer 122 that is configured to measure the pressure of the processing chamber 120 and provide this pressure information to one of the mass flow controllers by either an analog signal or a digital signal.

The MFCi then measures and controls the flow rate of the fluid Fi, as the fluid Fi flows from the inlet to an outlet of the MFCi, then onto a processing chamber 120. The processing chamber 120 is configured to process multiple fluids Fi (i=1, . . . , N). Some of the fluids Fi may be gases, for example processing gases used for semiconductor processing. Others may be fluids other than gas, e.g. liquids. At least some of the fluids Fi (i=1, . . . , N) may be different from each other. For example, the fluids Fi may include a number of different process gases and/or one or more purge gases. The mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) may receive the individual fluids Fi from fluid suppliers such as gas tanks, illustrated in FIG. 1 using reference numerals 105-1, 105-2, . . . , 105-i, . . . , 105-N.

One of the mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) is selected to be a master MFC, while the remaining (N−1) MFCs are slave or client MFCs. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1, MFC1 (110-1) is selected to be the master MFC, while MFC2, . . . , MFCN (110-2, . . . , 110-N) are selected to be the slave or client MFCs, although any other one of the N mass flow controllers can be selected to be the master MFC, in other embodiments of the present disclosure.

The master MFC 110-1 and the slave MFCs 110-2 . . . 110-N are linked to each other and to a host controller (not shown in FIG. 1; shown in FIG. 2) through a digital communications network. The network may include, but is not limited to, one or more of the following: Ethernet TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol); UDP/IP (User Datagram Protocol/Internet Protocol); DeviceNet; CAN (Controller Area Network); RS (Recommended Standard)-232; and RS (Recommended Standard)-485. A digital communication bus 150, shown in FIG. 1, enables communications between the master MFC 110-1 and the slave MFCs 110-2 . . . 110-N. The communication between the master MFC 110-1 and the host controller can be either on the same digital communication network or a separate digital communication network. In an embodiment in which the pressure signal from the pressure transducer 122 is a digital signal, the pressure transducer 122 may also be on the same digital communication network as the other MFCs.

Each mass flow controller MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) connected to the digital communication network is a self-closed flow control system. Typically, each individual MFCi may include a flow body Bi (i=1, . . . , N) that has an inlet and an outlet and that is configured to receive the corresponding fluid Fi at the inlet. The flow body Bi may provide a flow path for the fluid Fi, between the inlet and the outlet. Each mass flow controller MFCi may further include a flow sensor Si (i=1, . . . , N) that measures the flow rate of the fluid Fi as the fluid Fi flows from an inlet to an outlet of the MFCi, and a control valve Vi (i=1, . . . , N) that regulates the flow of the fluid Fi at a desired flow rate.

Linking mass flow controllers to a digital communication network in the manner described above permits a flexible method of configuring an unknown number of flow channels as an integrated pressure and mass flow ratio control system. In this way, the system may easily adapt to situations in which the number N of fluids Fi, and corresponding flow channels for the fluids Fi, may be variable, i.e. different for different applications.

The principal role of the master MFC 110-1 is to communicate with the host controller, and to transmit the commands received from the host controller to the slave MFCs. In particular, the master MFC 110-1 receives flow ratio set points from the host controller and communicates the flow ratio set points, together with one or more command signals, to all the slave MFCs. Only the master MFC, and not any of the slave MFCs, communicates with the host controller. The master MFC and each one of the slave MFCs respond to the flow ratio set points sent by the host controller by controlling the flow rate of the respective fluid flowing therethrough in such a way that the ratios Qi/QT (i=1, . . . , N) satisfy the ratio set points, where Qi represents the flow rate of the i-th fluid Fi and QT represents the sum QT=Q1+ . . . +Qi+ . . . QN of the flow rates of all N individual fluids Fi (i=1, . . . , N). In this way, the ratios Qi/QT (i=1, . . . , N) can be maintained at the flow ratio set points sent by the host controller.

One of the N mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) is a pressure control MFC, which receives a pressure set point from the host controller and controls pressure in the chamber 120 so as to maintain the pressure in the chamber at the pressure set point. In the illustrated embodiment, the pressure control MFC and the master MFC are the same, namely MFC1 (110-1). The system 100 operates most efficiently when the pressure control MFC and the master MFC are the same, as illustrated in FIG. 1. The pressure control MFC need not necessarily be the master MFC, however, and in other embodiments (not shown), MFCs other than the master MFC may be the pressure control MFC.

The pressure transducer 122 measures the actual pressure within the processing chamber 120. The pressure control MFC includes a pressure input at which it receives a chamber pressure signal from the pressure transducer 122. The chamber pressure signal indicates the chamber pressure measured by the pressure transducer 122. The pressure control MFC regulates the flow to the processing chamber 120 in order to control the pressure in the chamber, in response to the pressure signal, until the pressure in the chamber reaches the pressure set point.

FIG. 2 illustrates in more detail the communications between a host controller 210, a master MFC 220, and N−1 slave MFCs 230-1, 230-2, . . . , 230-i, 230-N−1, in one embodiment of the present disclosure. As described above, the master MFC 220 receives multiple flow ratio set points and a pressure set point from the host controller 210, and communicates the multiple flow ratio set points and the pressure set point to the slave MFCs 230-i (i=1, . . . , N−1). The master MFC 220 also computes the total flow rate QT by summing the flow rates Qi (i=1, . . . , N) of all the fluids Fi that flow through the individual mass flow controllers, and communicates the total flow rate QT to the slave MFCs 230-i. This total flow multiplied by the individual flow ratio percentage is the flow set point to the individual MFCs, and is sent out by the master MFC 220 via the digital communication network described in conjunction with FIG. 1.

As explained earlier, one of the MFCs (either the master MFC 220, or one of the slave MFCs 230-i) is selected as a pressure control MFC, which uses the pressure set point from the host controller (instead of the flow set point) to regulate its flow to control the chamber pressure. Its flow ratio is achieved and maintained by the other flow control MFCs. For example, if the pressure control MFC decreases its flow to the chamber in order to bring the chamber pressure down, other flow control MFCs decrease their flows to the chamber in order to maintain the targeted flow ratio. The net result is that the total flow to the chamber is decreased, and the chamber pressure is decreased.

Each slave MFC 230-i measures the actual flow rate of the fluid that flows through the slave MFC, and communicates the measured actual flow rate back to the master MFC 220. Each slave MFC 230-i may also compute the actual flow ratio of the fluid that flows through the slave MFC 230-i, where the actual flow ratio is the ratio between the actual flow rate measured by the slave MFC 230-i and the total flow rate QT received by the slave MFC 230-i from the master MFC 220.

Each slave MFC 230-i reports back to the master MFC 220 the actual flow rate and flow ratio. The master MFC 220, in turn, reports to the host controller 210 the actual flow rates and the actual flow ratios received from each slave MFC 230-i. The host controller 210 may adjust the flow ratio set points, in accordance with the processing receipt, and the master MFC 220 may receive these adjusted flow ratio set points. The host controller 210 may also query the status of the master MFC 220 and/or the slave MFCs 230-i and the actual flow ratio in each flow channel i.

In addition, the master MFC 220 may receive one or more further signals from the host controller 210, and communicate these signals to the slave MFCs 230-i. These further signals may include, but are not limited to: a signal that requests for the value of the valve current in one or more of the mass flow controllers; a signal that requests diagnostics information from one or more of the mass flow controllers; and a signal that requests for the value of the temperature in the flow body of one or more of the mass flow controllers. The slave MFCs may make the necessary measurements relating to the valve current and/or diagnostics information and/or temperature, and communicate the measured actual values requested by the host controller 210 to the master MFC 220. The master MFC 220, in turn, reports back to the host controller 210 the requested values of the valve current, temperature, and diagnostics information.

In a simpler embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3, a plurality N of mass flow controllers MFCi (i=1, . . . , N) may include one master MFC 320 configured as the pressure control MFC and N−1 slave MFCs 330-1, 330-2, . . . , 330-i, . . . , 330-N−1. These MFCs may all be configured as flow control MFCs, as described above, but in this embodiment, the master MFC 320 does not receive feedback from the slave MFCs 330-i (i=1, . . . , N−1) regarding actual flow rates and flow ratios in the individual slave MFCs. Rather, in the simple feed-forward configuration illustrated in FIG. 3, the master MFC 320 just receives the pressure set point and the N flow ratio set points from a host controller 310, then determines the flow set points for the N−1 slave flow control MFCs 330-i (i=1, . . . , N−1) according to the following equation:

Q sp , i = r sp , i r sp , master · Q m , master . ( 1 )

In the above equation, Qsp,i is the flow set point for the i-th flow control MFC, rsp,i is the flow ratio set point for the i-th flow control MFC, rsp,master is the flow ratio set point for the master MFC 320, and Qm,master is the measured flow rate of the master MFC 320. The master MFC 320 then communicates the flow set points determined by Eq.(1) to all the slave MFCs 330-i (i=1, . . . , N−1). In response, the slave MFCs control the flow rates of the respective fluids Qi so as to maintain the flow rate at the flow set points received from the master MFC 320. The master MFC 320 regulates its flow to control the chamber pressure so as to maintain the chamber pressure at the pressure set point received from the controller.

In sum, the present disclosure describes multiple MFCs that are linked together via a digital communication network to form an N-channel integrated pressure and flow ratio control system, which is very flexible and cost effective. The system implements a distributed control algorithm which can control both the chamber pressure and the flow ratios for multiple fluid flow channels. In this system, one of the MFCs is selected as the master MFC to communicate with the host controller to receive the chamber pressure set point, the flow ratio set points, and other command signals. The master MFC also collects the actual flow rates from the slave MFCs via a digital communication network, and sends the corresponding flow/pressure set point (received from the host controller) to the slave MFCs. The chamber pressure signal is routed to a pressure control MFC, which is selected to control the chamber pressure, and which may be the master MFC.

The system and method described in the present disclosure allow for the concentration of a plurality of reactive fluid/gas lines to be controlled, while keeping the chamber pressure constant. This has been a challenge for gas delivery technology in semiconductor processing. The approach described in the above disclosure enables a high accuracy control of fluid/gas mix ratios across a wide range of fluid/gas lines, while at the same time allowing the chamber pressure to be kept constant via real-time measurement.

While certain embodiments have been described of an integrated pressure and flow ratio control system and method, it is to be understood that the concepts implicit in these embodiments may be used in other embodiments as well. The protection of this application is limited solely to the claims that now follow.

In these claims, reference to an element in the singular is not intended to mean “one and only one” unless specifically so stated, but rather “one or more.” All structural and functional equivalents to the elements of the various embodiments described throughout this disclosure that are known or later come to be known to those of ordinary skill in the art are expressly incorporated herein by reference, and are intended to be encompassed by the claims. Moreover, nothing disclosed herein is intended to be dedicated to the public, regardless of whether such disclosure is explicitly recited in the claims. No claim element is to be construed under the provisions of 35 U.S.C. §112, sixth paragraph, unless the element is expressly recited using the phrase “means for” or, in the case of a method claim, the element is recited using the phrase “step for.”

Ding, Junhua, Zarkar, Kaveh H., L'Bassi, Michael, Clark, William R.

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10108205, Jun 28 2013 Applied Materials, Inc. Method and system for controlling a flow ratio controller using feed-forward adjustment
10114389, Jun 28 2013 Applied Materials, Inc.; Applied Materials, Inc Method and system for controlling a flow ratio controller using feedback
10303189, Jun 30 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Flow control system, method, and apparatus
10558190, Apr 20 2017 V-Tex Corporation Multi-mode-control apparatus for inner pressure of vacuum chamber and multi-mode-control method for inner pressure of vacuum chamber
10663337, Dec 30 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Apparatus for controlling flow and method of calibrating same
10679880, Sep 27 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Method of achieving improved transient response in apparatus for controlling flow and system for accomplishing same
10782165, Aug 20 2011 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Flow control system, method, and apparatus
10782710, Jun 30 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Flow control system, method, and apparatus
10838437, Feb 22 2018 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Apparatus for splitting flow of process gas and method of operating same
11003198, Aug 20 2011 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Controlled delivery of process gas using a remote pressure measurement device
11144075, Jun 30 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC. Flow control system, method, and apparatus
11424148, Sep 27 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC. Method of achieving improved transient response in apparatus for controlling flow and system for accomplishing same
11815920, Jun 30 2016 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC. Flow control system, method, and apparatus
11899477, Mar 03 2021 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC. Fluid flow control system comprising a manifold assembly
9004107, Aug 21 2012 Applied Materials, Inc Methods and apparatus for enhanced gas flow rate control
9958302, Aug 20 2011 ICHOR SYSTEMS, INC Flow control system, method, and apparatus
ER2711,
Patent Priority Assignee Title
5500256, Aug 16 1994 Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited Dry process apparatus using plural kinds of gas
6333272, Oct 06 2000 Lam Research Corporation Gas distribution apparatus for semiconductor processing
20050082002,
20050199342,
WO2095519,
///////////////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 10 2007MKS Instruments, Inc.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Mar 23 2007CLARK, WILLIAM R MKS Instruments, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190870037 pdf
Mar 23 2007ZARKAR, KAVEH H MKS Instruments, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190870037 pdf
Mar 26 2007DING, JUNHUAMKS Instruments, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190870037 pdf
Mar 26 2007L BASSI, MICHAELMKS Instruments, IncASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0190870037 pdf
Apr 29 2016Newport CorporationDEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCHSECURITY AGREEMENT0386630265 pdf
Apr 29 2016MKS Instruments, IncDEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCHSECURITY AGREEMENT0386630265 pdf
Apr 29 2016Newport CorporationBARCLAYS BANK PLCSECURITY AGREEMENT0386630139 pdf
Apr 29 2016MKS Instruments, IncBARCLAYS BANK PLCSECURITY AGREEMENT0386630139 pdf
Feb 01 2019Electro Scientific Industries, IncBARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE U S PATENT NO 7,919,646 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 048211 FRAME 0312 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT ABL 0556680687 pdf
Feb 01 2019MKS Instruments, IncBARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE U S PATENT NO 7,919,646 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 048211 FRAME 0312 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT ABL 0556680687 pdf
Feb 01 2019Newport CorporationBARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTPATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT ABL 0482110312 pdf
Feb 01 2019MKS Instruments, IncBARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTPATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT ABL 0482110312 pdf
Feb 01 2019DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCHMKS Instruments, IncRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0482260095 pdf
Feb 01 2019DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCHNewport CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0482260095 pdf
Feb 01 2019Electro Scientific Industries, IncBARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTPATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT ABL 0482110312 pdf
Feb 01 2019Newport CorporationBARCLAYS BANK PLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENTCORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE U S PATENT NO 7,919,646 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 048211 FRAME 0312 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT ABL 0556680687 pdf
Aug 17 2022BARCLAYS BANK PLCElectro Scientific Industries, IncRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0627390001 pdf
Aug 17 2022BARCLAYS BANK PLCNewport CorporationRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0627390001 pdf
Aug 17 2022BARCLAYS BANK PLCMKS Instruments, IncRELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0627390001 pdf
Aug 17 2022Electro Scientific Industries, IncJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0615720069 pdf
Aug 17 2022Newport CorporationJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0615720069 pdf
Aug 17 2022MKS Instruments, IncJPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENTSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0615720069 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Oct 28 2013M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Oct 27 2017M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Oct 27 2021M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 27 20134 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20136 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2014patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 27 20162 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 27 20178 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2018patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 27 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 27 202112 years fee payment window open
Oct 27 20216 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 27 2022patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 27 20242 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)