A method and article for designing dual-mode adapters in a joint press kit. A plurality of ball joints for use with the adapters are selected. An adapter design is created by defining a first variable representative of a physical characteristic of the adapter design; defining a second variable representing a quantity of ball joints that are not compatible with the adapter design in a second operational mode; generating data sets including the first and second variables; and utilizing the data sets to determine a value for a characteristic of the adapter.
|
1. An article for designing at least one dual-mode adapter for use with a ball joint press that is compatible with a plurality of ball joints, the article comprising:
a non-transitory computer-readable signal-bearing storage medium including a plurality of modules stored thereon;
a module for defining an inner diameter (ID) of an adapter design;
a module for generating a first data set that includes a value of the first variable, for each of the plurality of ball joints, a minimum inner diameter (MIN) and a maximum inner diameter (MAX) of the adapter design that would allow the adapter design to work as a push adapter and, for each ball joint, a midpoint (mid) between MIN and MAX;
a module for defining a second variable representing a quantity of ball joints that are not compatible with the adapter design in a second operational mode;
a module for defining a plurality of hypothetical values of the first variable;
a module for generating a second data set including a value of the second variable for each hypothetical value of the first variable;
a module for sorting the first data set in ascending order by mid value, and wherein the module for sorting the first data set includes a module for selecting a number (1. . . n) of ball joints, a module for computing an average value (AVE) of mid for the n ball joints, a module for calculating the standard deviation (SDEV) between AVE and the mid of the next ball joint (n+1) in the first data set, a module for dividing the mid of the last ball joint selected, by a numerical factor established by predetermined design criteria to obtain a quotient, and a module for setting a design value to AVE if SDEV is greater than or equal to the quotient;
a module for comparing the design value to the second data set to determine whether or not to change the design value to increase the number of ball joints that will function with the adapter design in the second operational mode; and
a module for changing the design value in response to an affirmative determination that the design value should be changed to increase the number of ball joints that will function with the adapter design; and
a module for outputting the design value for manufacturing the at least one dual-mode adapter.
2. The article of
3. The article of
a module for defining the first variable as an inner diameters (ID) of the ball joint adapter design,
a module for determining for each predetermined value of the first variable, the number of ball joints (RECFAIL) with which the adapter design will not function as a receiver, and
a module for sorting the second data set, ascending order, by ID.
4. The article of
a module for scanning the second data set, in ascending order until a predetermined value greater than the design value is located,
a module for determining whether RECFAIL for the predetermined value greater than the design value is located, and
a module for changing the design value to the predetermined value greater than the design value if RECFAIL for the predetermined value greater than the design value is less than RECFAIL for the predetermined value immediately previous in the second data set.
5. The article of
a module for verifying that adapter design will function in the first operational mode for the plurality of ball joints.
|
This application is a division of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/185,053, filed Jul. 20, 2005, Pat. No. 7,669,305, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 10/950,066, currently pending, which was filed on Sep. 24, 2004.
People who service automobiles use joint press kits to install and remove joints, such as press-in ball joints and universal joints, of vehicle suspensions. A joint press kit often includes several adapters. The adapters typically fall into two categories. “Push” adapters bear against joints to drive them in a particular direction, e.g. into or out of a vehicle suspension, while “receiver” adapters bear against the vehicle suspension and receive a joint as it is pushed. Thus, the push adapter and the receive adapter cooperate to force the joint either into or out of a vehicle suspension.
Adapters are typically made to service a particular type of joint. The size and the shape of an adapter are tailored to the characteristics of the joint that it is meant to service. For example, a narrow ball joint requires a correspondingly narrow push adapter and can operate effectively with a wide number of receive adapters provided they are wider than the joint. There are many different sizes and shapes of ball joints. Accordingly, for a joint press kit to provide comprehensive coverage, it must include a correspondingly large number of adapters.
This presents a problem, however, because as the number of ball joint types increase, the cost of providing a larger number of adapters becomes prohibitive from a cost, time, and storage standpoint. Further, despite having a large number of adapters, the press kit might still not cover all the possible ball joints. Accordingly, what is needed is a joint press kit in which the number of adapters is optimized to provide the broadest possible coverage of the ball joints on the market.
A second difficulty with joint press kits is that they are not adaptable for use in a wide variety of vehicles. One make of vehicle may require installation of an upper ball joint by providing downward force, whereas another vehicle may require upward force. Therefore, what is needed is a joint press kit that may be used in many different configurations.
A third difficulty with joint press kits is they do not provide an accommodation for the grease fitting during the removal and installation of ball joints. The grease fitting is located on the side opposite the stem side of a ball joint. The grease fitting can not be present during installation and removal operations because it will interfere with the operation of the joint press. Thus, prior to removal of a ball joint, the grease fitting must be removed. Further, during installation of a ball joint, the grease fitting can only be added after the ball joint is securely placed in the suspension. These operations are often difficult to perform. Accordingly, there is a need for a joint press that allows a user to install or remove a ball joint while the grease fitting is in place.
A fourth difficulty with joint press kits is that the adapters do not always attach to the press easily or effectively. For example, if a kit requires that the adapters be screwed onto the pressure screw, this consumes valuable time. On the other hand, if the adapters can attach to the pressure screw quickly, they might not be effectively secured. Therefore, what is needed is a device for efficiently and effectively attaching ball joint adapters to the press.
A fifth problem with ball joint kits relates to the length of the adapters. Often, it may be desirable to use an adapter having a particular width to perform a removal or an installation operation. Yet, if the adapter is not long enough to bear against the vehicle suspension it is unusable. Therefore, what is needed is an adapter extension to impart usefulness to otherwise unusable adapters.
In one embodiment, a joint press is provided. The joint press includes a yoke having a first end and a second end. A first adapter attachment member is positioned on the first end. A second adapter attachment member is positioned on the second end. The first adapter attachment member and the second adapter attachment member have the same profile, thereby allowing the same adapter to be removably connected to either the first end or the second end.
In another embodiment, a joint press is provided. The joint press includes a yoke having a first end and a second end. A first attachment member is located on the first end. A second attachment member is located on the second end. At least one adapter is provided that can be removably coupled to either the first attachment member or the second attachment member.
In a further embodiment, a joint press is provided. The joint press includes a yoke having a first end and a second end. A first adapter attachment member is positioned on the first end. A second adapter attachment member is positioned on the second end. Plural adapters are provided, each having a first end adapted to receive a joint and a second end that is adapted to be attached to either the first attachment member or the second attachment member.
In yet another embodiment, a device for attaching an adapter to a joint press is provided. The device includes a sleeve having an interior surface and an exterior surface, wherein the sleeve is part of the adapter. An interior groove is positioned on the interior surface of the sleeve. A snap-ring having a transverse circular cross-section is positioned in the interior groove. The snap-ring floats within the groove. A shaft having an exterior surface is part of the joint press. An exterior groove is positioned on the exterior surface of the shaft. The snap ring engages the exterior groove when the shaft and the sleeve are mated.
In a further embodiment, a pressure pad for a ball joint press is provided. The pressure pad includes a shaft and an engagement portion attached to the shaft. The engagement portion includes a recess that is adapted to receive a ball joint grease fitting.
In a further embodiment, a method for designing at least one dual-mode adapter for use with a ball joint press is provided. A plurality of ball joints for use with the ball joint press are selected and an adapter design is created. The adapter design is created by defining a first variable representative of a physical characteristic of the adapter design, generating a first data set that includes a value of the first variable, for each of the plurality of ball joints, that is sufficient to allow the adapter design to work with the respective ball joint in a first operational mode, defining a second variable representing a quantity of ball joints that are not compatible with the adapter design in a second operational mode, defining a plurality of predetermined values of the first variable, generating a second data set including a value of the second variable for each predetermined value of the first variable, utilizing the first data set to determine a design value for the first variable, comparing the design value to the second data set to determine whether or not to change the design value to increase the number of ball joints that will function with the adapter design in the second operational mode, and changing the adapter design value in response to an affirmative determination that a change in the in the design value will increase the number of ball joints that will function with the adapter design in the second operational mode. The dual-mode adapter is then manufactured according to the adapter design.
In a further embodiment, an article for designing at least one dual-mode adapter for use with a ball joint press that is compatible with a plurality of ball joints is provided. The article includes a computer-readable signal-bearing medium. Means in the medium defines a first variable representative of a physical characteristic of the adapter design. Means in the medium generates a first data set that includes a value of the first variable, for each of the plurality of ball joints, that is sufficient to allow the adapter design to work with the respective ball joint in a first operational mode. Means in the medium defines a second variable representing a quantity of ball joints that are not compatible with the adapter design in a second operational mode. Means in the medium defines a plurality of predetermined values of the first variable. Means in the medium generates a second data set including a value of the second variable for each predetermined value of the first variable. Means in the medium utilizes the first data set to determine a design value for the first variable. Means in the medium compares the design value to the second data set to determine whether or not to change the design value to increase the number of ball joints that will function with the adapter design in the second operational mode. Means in the medium changes the adapter design value in response to an affirmative determination that the design value should be changed to increase the number of ball joints that will function with the adapter design.
Referring to
Press 12, in one example, comprises a yoke 13, a pressure screw 14, and an adapter attachment shaft 15. Pressure screw 14 is positioned in a threaded opening (see
Pressure screw 14 is at least partially hollow and includes an opening on one end. As will be discussed further herein, either of pressure pads 21, 22 (see
Adapter attachment shaft 15 and pressure pad 22 act as adapter attachment members to which the various adapters can be connected to perform an installation or removal operation. Adapter attachment shaft 15 and pressure pad 22 both include an external circumferential groove 18. External groove 18 mates with a corresponding internal circumferential groove, containing a snap-ring, which is located within each adapter to attach the adapter to either shaft 15 or pressure pad 22. Alternatively, other means, such as friction fits or various threaded configurations, could be used to attach the adapters to attachment shaft 15 or pressure pad 22. The connection between these parts is discussed further herein.
Adapter attachment shaft 15, for exemplary purposes, is shown both positioned in the opening at end 17 of yoke 13 and to the side of yoke 13. Adapter attachment shaft 15 is connected to yoke 13 by placing end 19 into the opening on end 17 of yoke 13. Adapter attachment shaft 15 could be secured to yoke 13 through a variety of means. For example, shaft 15 could have an external groove that mates with an internal groove and snap-ring located in yoke 15. Alternatively, another means, such as a friction fit or threaded engagement could be used. Adapter attachment shaft 15 is at least partially hollow and in the illustrated embodiment is tubular to allow a ball joint stud to pass within it during a removal or installation operation.
Ball joint pressure pad 22 includes a shaft 24 and an engagement portion 25. The engagement portion 25 is cylindrical and includes a first base surface 26, a second base surface 27, and a sidewall 28. External groove 18 is located on the sidewall 28 of engagement portion 25. Base surface 26 in one example is flat and can be utilized to engage a ball joint. Base surface 27 is connected to shaft 22.
The dual-use adapters 31-36 are designed to function as both “push” adapters and “receive” adapters. Single-use adapters 41-44 are designed to perform only one function, either pushing or receiving. Each of the adapters has a first end 61 for engaging a joint, either through pushing or receiving, and a second end 62 that connects to adapter attachment shaft 15 or to pressure pad 22. Adapters 31-36 and adapters 43, 44 are basic cylindrical adapters. Adapters 41, 42 include have an angled surface 39 at end 61 for engaging an angled suspension member.
Adapter extension 50, as will be discussed herein, is stackable with respect to the other adapters. Thus, adapter extension 50 can increase the effective length of the other adapters. Adapter extension 50 includes external groove 18 for mating with the snap ring the other adapters.
In another example, a common grease fitting that installs by way of threaded interface, is installed in a radially drilled hole in the yoke 13 generally at the end 16 that includes the internally threaded opening in which the pressure screw 14 is positioned. The threaded bore in which the grease fitting mounts begins at a location on the yoke 13 such that when the grease fitting is installed it is not prone to being damaged by contact with external objects during use. This bore continues through the solid forging of the yoke 13, breaking into the larger, internally threaded pressure screw bore mentioned above.
Referring to
Ball joints typically install either in the direction of the stem 202 or in a direction opposite the stem 202.
For brevity, the drawing depicts press kit 10 in operations with a ball joint that installs in the stemwise direction. As those with skill in the art would understand, joint press kit 10 will also function with ball joints that install in the counterstemwise direction.
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
TABLE 1
Number
Function
31
Dual
32
Dual
33
Dual
34
Dual
35
Dual
36
Dual
41
Receiving
42
Receiving
43
Receiving
44
Pushing
50
Extension
Whether an adapter is placed on pressure pad 22 depends on the geometry of the ball joint 200 and the configuration of the vehicle suspension. Similarly, the choice of adapter to place on attachment shaft 15 depends on the geometry of ball joint 200 and the configuration of the vehicle suspension. The particular mechanic performing the operation will decide after analyzing both the ball joint 200 and the suspension.
To install ball joint 200, pressure screw 14 is turned so that pressure pad 22 advances in direction A. Surface 26 of pressure pad 22 will eventually contact surface 208 of ball joint 200 and adapter 235 will bear against suspension 222. As the pressure screw 14 continues to be turned, adapter 235 will provide an opposing force against which pressure pad 22 pushes to drive ball joint 200 into opening 225. Stem 202 of ball joint will enter the bore of adapter 235. Accordingly, as will be discussed further herein the through bore of adapter 235 must be large enough to accommodate the ball joint stem 202. Ball joint 200 will stop advancing when flange 206 contacts suspension 220.
Referring to
In
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
As will be further discussed herein, second portion 706 of each adapter includes a groove 801 in which a snap ring 803 is positioned. When pressure pad attachment shaft 15, pressure pad engagement portion 25, or end 61 of extension 50 are inserted into portion 706, groove 18 mates with groove 801 and snap ring 803 engages both grooves 18, 801, thereby holding the pieces together.
First portion 704 has a diameter d1. Diameter d1, varies according to the particular adapter. The values of d1 are chosen so kit 10 will cover the largest number of ball joints possible. The diameter d1 for each adapter shown in
TABLE 2
Cylindrical Adapters
ADAPTER
d1
OD
bore depth
d3
Ls
Lo
31
1.680
1.890
0.650
1.250
0.830
1.100
32
1.775
2.000
0.550
1.250
0.730
1.000
33
2.010
2.250
1.700
1.250
1.880
2.150
34
2.250
2.500
0.670
1.250
0.850
1.120
35
2.250
2.500
2.300
1.250
2.480
2.750
36
2.425
2.750
1.250
1.250
1.430
1.700
43
2.680
2.937
2.300
1.250
2.480
2.750
44
0.895
1.330
1.550
0.895
1.400
1.820
50
1.250
1.645
1.780
1.250
1.650
2.050
TABLE 3
Special Shaped Adapters
MAX.
cutout
ADAPT-
bore
Face
or
ER
d1
OD
depth
d3
angle
Ls
angle?
Lo
41
1.845
2.000
0.800
1.250
4.500
0.980
Angle
1.250
42
2.350
2.650
1.700
1.250
4.500
1.880
Angle
2.150
Second portion 706 has a diameter d2. Diameter d2 does not vary for the respective adapters. In one example, d2 is 1.656 inches for each adapter. Third portion 708 has a diameter d3 that also does not vary from adapter to adapter. In one example, diameter d3 is 1.25 inches, which is large enough to allow passage of the largest known ball joint stud 202 (
Referring to
Referring to
The process shown in
The process in one example is performed on a computing device or system. The computing device in one example is a personal computer. In another example the computing device could be a workstation, a file server, a mainframe, a personal digital assistant (“PDA”), a mobile telephone, or a combination of these devices. In the case of more than one computing device, the multiple computing devices could be coupled together through a network.
A network in one example includes any network that allows multiple computing devices to communicate with one another (e.g., a Local Area Network (“LAN”), a Wide Area Network (“WAN”), a wireless LAN, a wireless WAN, the Internet, a wireless telephone network, etc.) In a further example, a network comprises a combination of the above mentioned networks. The computing device can be connected to the network through landline (e.g., T1, DSL, Cable, POTS) or wireless technology, such as that found on mobile telephones and PDA devices.
The computing device could include a plurality of components such as computer software and/or hardware components to carry out the process. A number of such components can be combined or divided. An exemplary component employs and/or comprises a series of computer instructions written in or implemented with any of a number of programming languages, as will be appreciated by those skilled in the art.
In one example, the process is embedded in an article including at least one computer-readable signal-bearing medium. One example of a computer-readable signal-bearing medium is a recordable data storage medium such as a magnetic, optical, and/or atomic scale data storage medium. In another example, a computer-readable signal-bearing medium is a modulated carrier signal transmitted over a network comprising or coupled with computing device or system, for instance, a telephone network, a local area network (“LAN”), the Internet, and/or a wireless network.
Referring to
In step 1103, the data is compiled that relates to the ball joints and data sets are created. The process uses the data sets in designing the adapters. The data can be collected in a number of ways. For instance, a user can search databases, read product specifications, observe, or measure the ball joints. In one example, the process uses the data sets to determine one or more inner diameter values d1 (
In one example, the process involves the creation of two data sets. An example of the first data set is shown in Table 4. Prior to preparing Table 4, 74 ball joints were selected as the universe of ball joints. It was then determined how many ball joints, of the 74, required the use of an adapter for a push operation. In the case of the 74 ball joints selected, 51 required the use of a push adapter during a push operation. For the remainder of the ball joints, a push operation can be performed with the pressure pad 22 or adapter attachment shaft 15 acting alone, i.e. without an adapter. Accordingly, Table 4 provides push adapter data for the 51 out of the 74 ball joints selected in step 1101. Push adapter data reflects characteristics an adapter must have in order to function as a push adapter with a particular ball joint. In Table 4, n is an index and represents a particular ball joint, MIN(n) is the smallest possible inner diameter, in inches, that an adapter can have and still function as a push adapter for a particular ball joint; MAX(n) is the largest possible inner diameter, in inches, that an adapter can have and still function as a push adapter for that ball joint. MID(n) is the midpoint, or the average, between MIN(n) and MAX(n). Table 4 also includes a ball joint identifier for each ball joint. The data in Table 4 is sorted in ascending order based on MID(n).
After compiling the data, the data is ready for use in the process. As will be described, each value of MID(n) is received by the process as input.
TABLE 4
Ball
joint
n
ident. #
MIN(n)
MAX(n)
MID(n)
1
28
1.550
1.775
1.663
2
30
1.550
1.775
1.663
3
32
1.590
1.685
1.638
4
76
1.595
1.720
1.658
5
45a
1.617
1.685
1.651
6
45b
1.617
1.690
1.654
7
6
1.645
1.730
1.688
8
16
1.645
1.730
1.688
9
15
1.646
1.750
1.698
10
29
1.647
1.750
1.699
11
20
1.650
1.750
1.700
12
21
1.655
1.750
1.703
13
36
1.657
1.750
1.704
14
73
1.690
1.835
1.763
15
74
1.695
1.835
1.765
16
56
1.715
1.915
1.815
17
65
1.730
1.840
1.785
18
10
1.740
1.850
1.795
19
43
1.740
1.850
1.795
20
50
1.740
1.850
1.795
21
1
1.750
1.850
1.800
22
3
1.750
1.830
1.790
23
14
1.750
1.850
1.800
24
55
1.835
2.070
1.953
25
58
1.900
2.020
1.960
26
5
1.915
2.040
1.978
27
7
1.950
2.060
2.005
28
11
1.950
2.060
2.005
29
12
1.950
2.030
1.990
30
53
1.950
2.050
2.000
31
72
1.950
2.100
2.025
32
9
1.960
2.050
2.005
33
25
1.960
2.050
2.005
34
37
1.960
2.020
1.990
35
2
1.970
2.030
2.000
36
4
1.970
2.030
2.000
37
13
1.990
2.180
2.085
38
35
2.000
2.180
2.090
39
39
2.000
2.080
2.040
40
60
2.057
2.275
2.166
41
61
2.088
2.275
2.182
42
8
2.135
2.310
2.223
43
41
2.160
2.365
2.263
44
22
2.190
2.375
2.283
45
59
2.240
2.375
2.308
46
42
2.240
2.370
2.305
47
69
2.300
2.440
2.370
48
66
2.375
2.490
2.433
49
68
2.380
2.460
2.420
50
44
2.390
2.460
2.425
51
23
2.400
2.500
2.450
52
out of data
Referring to Table 5, a second data set is shown. The second data set lists receiver data. Table 5 provides a measure of the incidence of failure for a number of idealized or hypothetical adapters having various inner diameter values, while acting as receive adapters. Each hypothetical adapter is represented by z. The process uses the hypothetical adapter inner diameter values to determine and assess the receiver requirements of the adapters. RECDIA is an inner diameter value for a hypothetical adapter Z. RECFAIL is the number of functional failures that the hypothetical adapter would experience with the ball joints in the universe of ball joints selected in step 1101. Using the representative example, if there are 74 ball joints, then an adapter has 148 possible failure that it can experience with the universe of ball joints. This is because an adapter can be used in two possible operations, remove or an install. Accordingly, for a particular ball joint, an adapter can experience between 0-failures, i.e., no failure, failure in install operation only, failure in remove operation only, and failure in both operations. Thus, the number 148 equals 74×2, i.e. 74 ball joints times 2 possible operations (remove and install). A functional failure in one example means that the pertinent portion of the ball joint is of a larger diameter than the inner diameter, RECDIA, of the theoretical adapter and thus the adapter will not function as a receiver. For example, a RECDIA of 1.5 inches results in 148 failures. The failures are compiled for respective RECDIA values that are chosen to encompass all receiver adapter requirements. For example, Table 5 uses inner diameter, RECDIA, steps of 0.01 and includes 148 possible operations, with none requiring receiver diameters less than 1.5 or more than 3.0. All operations are successful with RECDIA values between 1.5 and 3.0. The data is sorted in ascending order by RECDIA value.
TABLE 5
Z
RECDIA
RECFAIL
#
RECDIA
RECFAIL
#
RECDIA
RECFAIL
1
1.500
148
54
2.020
58
107
2.540
10
2
1.510
146
55
2.030
58
108
2.550
10
3
1.520
146
56
2.040
56
109
2.560
10
4
1.530
146
57
2.050
56
110
2.570
10
5
1.540
146
58
2.060
56
111
2.580
10
6
1.550
146
59
2.070
56
112
2.590
10
7
1.560
146
60
2.080
56
113
2.600
8
8
1.570
146
61
2.090
55
114
2.610
8
9
1.580
145
62
2.100
54
115
2.620
7
10
1.590
142
63
2.110
54
116
2.630
7
11
1.600
142
64
2.120
54
117
2.640
7
12
1.610
142
65
2.130
54
118
2.650
3
13
1.620
139
66
2.140
54
119
2.660
2
14
1.630
133
67
2.150
52
120
2.670
1
15
1.640
133
68
2.160
51
121
2.680
0
16
1.650
133
69
2.170
51
122
2.690
0
17
1.660
133
70
2.180
51
123
2.700
0
18
1.670
133
71
2.190
50
124
2.710
0
19
1.680
132
72
2.200
47
125
2.720
0
20
1.690
132
73
2.210
38
126
2.730
0
21
1.700
132
74
2.220
36
127
2.740
0
22
1.710
132
75
2.230
33
128
2.750
0
23
1.720
132
76
2.240
33
129
2.760
0
24
1.730
132
77
2.250
32
130
2.770
0
25
1.740
124
78
2.260
32
131
2.780
0
26
1.750
119
79
2.270
32
132
2.790
0
27
1.760
118
80
2.280
32
133
2.800
0
28
1.770
115
81
2.290
32
134
2.810
0
29
1.775
111
82
2.300
31
135
2.820
0
30
1.780
111
83
2.310
25
136
2.830
0
31
1.790
111
84
2.320
25
137
2.840
0
32
1.800
108
85
2.330
24
138
2.850
0
33
1.810
107
86
2.340
19
139
2.860
0
34
1.820
106
87
2.350
19
140
2.870
0
35
1.830
105
88
2.360
19
141
2.880
0
36
1.840
105
89
2.370
19
142
2.890
0
37
1.850
104
90
2.380
18
143
2.900
0
38
1.860
103
91
2.390
18
144
2.910
0
39
1.870
103
92
2.400
17
145
2.920
0
40
1.880
103
93
2.410
16
146
2.930
0
41
1.890
97
94
2.420
15
147
2.940
0
42
1.900
91
95
2.425
14
148
2.950
0
43
1.910
90
96
2.430
14
149
2.960
0
44
1.920
89
97
2.440
14
150
2.970
0
45
1.930
88
98
2.450
14
151
2.980
0
46
1.940
84
99
2.460
14
152
2.990
0
47
1.950
82
100
2.470
14
153
3.000
0
48
1.960
82
101
2.480
14
49
1.970
73
102
2.490
14
50
1.980
69
103
2.500
14
51
1.990
69
104
2.510
12
52
2.000
69
105
2.520
12
53
2.010
60
106
2.530
10
Referring further to
In step 1107, Phase 2 performs analyzes and optionally adjusts the value of S(x) that Phase 1 calculates. Phase 2 utilizes the data in Table 5 to determine whether a slight increase in S(x) would appreciably reduce the number of failures that the adapter design would encounter as a receive adapter. If the answer is yes, then Phase 2 adjusts S(x) upward. If the answer is no, then S(x) is left as calculated by Phase 1.
In step 1109, Phase 3 performs a verification step to insure that an adapter with a value of S(x), as determined in Phases 1 and 2, will still work as a push adapter for the group of adapters that it should cover. This is necessary because if, for instance, Phase 2 increases the value of S(x), then the process must verify that S(x) has not been set to a value that would prevent it from functioning as a push adapter for the entire group x of ball joints.
In step 1111, a determination is made whether the process is out of input data from Table 4. If the answer is yes, then Phase 4 begins.
A more detailed description of phases 1-4 will now be provided for illustrative purposes.
Referring to
n—represents a particular ball joint in the selected universe of ball joints.
x—represents a particular group of ball joints for which an adapter having an inner diameter value S(x) is designed.
y—used by Phase 1 to calculate a running average of MID(n).
SUM—used by Phase 1 to calculate a running average for MID(n).
z—represents a hypothetical adapter in Phase 2.
a—index variable used by Phase 3.
Referring further to
One can see that steps 1204-1212 serve to incrementally calculate the average value of Mid(n) in Table 4 until the process reaches the end of the data set. When the process reaches the end of data, then in steps 1210-1212, the process insures that an error condition is not present, and if an error condition is not present, then S(x) is set, in steps 1211-1212 to the last valid computation of AVE. An error condition would be present if, for instance, MID(1) were equal to zero because this would mean either the data set were empty or missing data. If the end of data is reached, n is reduced by 1 in step 1211 because an empty value of Mid(n) should not be used in calculating S(x).
In step 1213, the standard deviation between AVE(n) and the next value of MID (i.e. MID(n+1)) in Table 4 is calculated. In step 1215, a determination is made as to whether the standard deviation is greater than AVE(n)/30. If the answer is yes, then in step 1217, a value of S(x) is set as equal to the current running average AVE(n) and flow passes to Phase 2. If the answer is no, then, in step 1219, n and y are incremented and another value of MID(n) is read into the process. Steps 1204-1217 continue until end of data or the relationship in step 1215 is true.
Whether a grouping allows the designation of a inner diameter value S(x) that would allow an adapter to work as a push adapter for the entire group is dependent on whether the relationship in step 1215 is true. Step 1215 calculates whether the standard deviation between the running average and the next value in Table 4, which has not been used in calculating the running average, exceeds the running average divided by 30. Put simply, step 1215 looks for a grouping in the push adapter data. Step 1215 determines whether the next ball joint push requirement diverges significantly from those that came before it. The relationship in step 1215 depends on the denominator used in step 1215. In
Table 6 shows the outputs of Phase 1, as they are calculated, if data for the exemplary group of ball joints provided in Table 2 is used as input. One can see that the MID(n) value is relatively stable until after n=13. Accordingly, the standard deviation, SDEV, remains relatively small. Therefore, the outlines of a grouping is not apparent. There is, however, a significant increase in MID between n=13 and n=14. This triggers a corresponding large increase in SDEV, thereby leading to the relationship of SDEV>AVE(n)/30 as true. Accordingly, the process determines that n=1-13 provides a ball joint grouping with which an adapter of with an inner diameter value of 1.677 could function as a push adapter. Accordingly, the process outputs 1.677 as the first value of S(x), i.e., S(1). Table 4 demonstrates that the data exhibits similar behavior between n=23 and n=24; n=39 and n=40; and n=46 and n=47. At n=52, Phase 1 realizes that it is out of data. Consequently, n is set back to 51 and the value of AVE(51), which is 2.420, is set as S(5).
TABLE 6
Ball
Outputs
joint
s(x)
n
ident. #
MID(n)
AVE(n)
SDEV(n)
AVE(n)/30
output
1
28
1.663
2
30
1.663
1.663
0.018
0.0551
3
32
1.638
1.654
0.002
0.0552
4
76
1.658
1.655
0.003
0.0551
5
45a
1.651
1.654
0.000
0.0551
6
45b
1.654
1.654
0.024
0.0553
7
6
1.688
1.659
0.020
0.0554
8
16
1.688
1.662
0.025
0.0555
9
15
1.698
1.666
0.023
0.0557
10
29
1.699
1.670
0.021
0.0557
11
20
1.700
1.672
0.022
0.0558
12
21
1.703
1.675
0.020
0.0559
13
36
1.704
1.677
0.060
0.0588
1.677
14
73
1.763
1.763
0.002
0.0588
15
74
1.765
1.764
0.036
0.0594
16
56
1.815
1.781
0.003
0.0594
17
65
1.785
1.782
0.009
0.0595
18
10
1.795
1.785
0.007
0.0595
19
43
1.795
1.786
0.006
0.0596
20
50
1.795
1.788
0.009
0.0596
21
1
1.800
1.789
0.001
0.0596
22
3
1.790
1.789
0.008
0.0597
23
14
1.800
1.790
0.115
0.0651
1.790
24
55
1.953
1.953
0.005
0.0652
25
58
1.960
1.956
0.015
0.0654
26
5
1.978
1.963
0.029
0.0658
27
7
2.005
1.974
0.022
0.0660
28
11
2.005
1.980
0.007
0.0661
29
12
1.990
1.982
0.013
0.0661
30
53
2.000
1.984
0.029
0.0663
31
72
2.025
1.989
0.011
0.0664
32
9
2.005
1.991
0.010
0.0664
33
25
2.005
1.993
0.002
0.0664
34
37
1.990
1.992
0.005
0.0664
35
2
2.000
1.993
0.005
0.0664
36
4
2.000
1.993
0.065
0.0667
37
13
2.085
2.000
0.064
0.0669
38
35
2.090
2.006
0.024
0.0669
39
39
2.040
2.008
0.112
0.0722
2.008
40
60
2.166
2.166
0.011
0.0725
41
61
2.182
2.174
0.034
0.0730
42
8
2.223
2.190
0.051
0.0736
43
41
2.263
2.208
0.053
0.0741
44
22
2.283
2.223
0.060
0.0746
45
59
2.308
2.237
0.048
0.0749
46
42
2.305
2.247
0.087
0.0790
2.247
47
69
2.370
2.370
0.044
0.0800
48
66
2.433
2.401
0.013
0.0803
49
68
2.420
2.408
0.012
0.0804
50
44
2.425
2.412
0.027
0.0807
51
23
2.450
2.420
2.420
52
out of data
Referring to
In step 1305, the process evaluates whether RECFAIL(19) (i.e. the RECFAIL number for an inner diameter of 1.680) multiplied by 110% is less than the RECFAIL(18). If the answer is no, S(1) is left as 1.677 and flow passes to phase 3. If the answer is yes, in step 1309, the process determines whether 1.680, is less than the MAX(n) value from Table 4. In the present case, n was last 13 in Phase 1. Therefore, the process determines whether RECDIA(19), which is 1.670 is less than MAX(13), which equals 1.75. The answer is yes, so flow progresses to 1311, in which S(x) is increased to RECDIA(19), i.e. 1.680. If the answer were false, S(1) would remain 1.667. In either case, flow passes to Phase 3. It should be noted that for the data in Tables 4 and 5, the relationship in step 1305 was false so the process did not increase S(x) in Phase 2. Accordingly, the preceding example was used for illustrative purposes only.
Phase 2 is beneficial because it determines that if S(x) is between two data points in Table 5, for which the decrease in receiver failure is significant, then it is worthwhile to increase S(x). The inventors have determined that the relationship RECFAIL(z+1)×110%<RECFAIL(z) represents a significant decrease. The preceding relationship depends on the multiplier used, which in the present case is 110%. The applicants have found that other multiplier values can be used, but there are trade offs. The greater the threshold used, the less likely that the process will take advantage of an increase in adapter size to reduce receiver failure. On the other hand, if a lower multiplier is used, then a greater number of S(x) values will be adjusted, which could result in a higher frequency of design failure as determined in Phase 3.
Referring to
Once it is determined that S(x) either complies or does not comply with the MIN and MAX requirements for its ball joint grouping, flow passes to step 1411. In step 1411, a determination as to whether the next value from Table 4, (i.e. MID(n+1)) equals “out of data” is made. If this is the case, then Phase 4 begins. If this is not the case, Phases 1 through 3 repeat to find a new S(x) value. Referring to
Referring to
Phase 4 works as follows: In step 1501, x is incremented. Thus, if Phases 1-3 produced five S(x) values, Phase 4 names the final S(x) value as S(6). In step 1503, the process determines whether RECFAIL(z) is zero. If it is not z is incremented in step 1505 and the step 1503 is repeated. When a RECFAIL value is determined to be zero, then in step 1507, the last S(x) value is set to the RECDIA value corresponding to that RECFAIL value, and the process ends in step 1509.
The matter set forth in the foregoing description and accompanying drawings is offered by way of illustration only and not as a limitation. While particular embodiments have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that changes and modifications may be made without departing from the broader aspects of applicants' contribution. The actual scope of the protection sought is intended to be defined in the following claims when viewed in their proper perspective based on the prior art.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11338418, | Aug 17 2020 | Snap-On Incorporated; SNAP-ON CORPORATION | Joint press adapter |
11654536, | Aug 17 2020 | Snap-On Incorporated | Joint press adapter |
11813723, | Aug 17 2020 | Snap-On Incorporated | Joint press adapter |
11815132, | Mar 13 2020 | Tiger Tool International Incorporated | Bushing insertion systems and methods |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3102333, | |||
3237291, | |||
3651553, | |||
3696496, | |||
3745637, | |||
3786544, | |||
3791006, | |||
3862483, | |||
3942234, | Jul 08 1974 | Seal and bearing installation tool | |
4120082, | Sep 19 1977 | Universal drive shaft service kit | |
4558502, | Sep 17 1983 | SKF Kugellagerfabriken GmbH | Process and apparatus for assembling universal joints |
4570319, | Sep 04 1984 | Tiger Tool International Incorporated | Universal joint dismantler |
4649615, | Jun 11 1984 | Complete puller tool | |
4658488, | Feb 28 1985 | Tiger Tool International Incorporated | Drive-line puller |
4977660, | Nov 13 1989 | Tool for removing and installing an automotive universal joint | |
5490432, | Jun 05 1992 | DELAWARE CAPITAL FORMATION, INC , A DELAWARE CORP | Kit for operating upon bearings |
5781977, | Feb 13 1995 | Lawrence I., Wechsler | Ball joint compressor |
5836078, | Dec 26 1995 | Torque-Traction Technologies, Inc | Apparatus for removing or mounting a bearing cup |
5857252, | Aug 04 1997 | Tiger Tool International Incorporated | Press for installing universal joint bearing cups |
5898985, | Aug 26 1997 | Chrysler Corporation | Bushing removal tool |
6035533, | Apr 30 1998 | Dana Automotive Systems Group, LLC | Apparatus and method for installing and removing a bearing cup on a universal joint |
6131262, | May 19 1998 | Ball joint removal fixture | |
20020107672, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jul 01 2005 | LIONBERG, DANIEL D | Snap-On Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021487 | /0944 | |
Sep 05 2008 | Snap-On Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 15 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 21 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 15 2022 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Feb 15 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Aug 15 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 15 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Feb 15 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Feb 15 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Aug 15 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 15 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Feb 15 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Feb 15 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Aug 15 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Feb 15 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Feb 15 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |