A soil moisture mapping based method for transferring soil for an earthworks construction project includes outputting signals based on soil moisture data and position data indicative of a location within a cut area or a fill area of the soil. The method further includes selecting a location within a cut area for obtaining fill soil or a location within a fill area for depositing fill soil based on the signals. A system for supplying soil for an earthworks construction project includes at least one machine having a sensor configured to sense soil moisture, and a receiver configured to receive position data corresponding with a location of the soil, and a signaling device configured to output signals based on the position data and soil moisture data. A transfer machine is included in the system and configured to selectively transfer fill soil between the cut area and the fill area based on the signals.
|
10. A control system comprising:
at least one data processor;
a sensor in communication with the at least one data processor; and
a receiver in communication with the at least one data processor;
the at least one data processor being configured to receive sensor data indicative of a moisture content of soil of a cut area and a fill area from the sensor, and to receive position data of the cut area and the fill area from the receiver;
the control system being configured to select a location within the fill area for depositing fill soil and a location within the cut area for obtaining fill soil, based on the sensor data and the position data, and being further configured to output a control signal responsive to selecting the locations which directs a fill soil transfer machine to transfer fill soil between the cut area and the fill area.
1. A control system comprising:
at least one data processor;
said at least one data processor being configured to receive sensor data indicative of a moisture content of soil of a cut area and a fill area; and
said at least one data processor further being configured to receive position data of the cut area and the fill area;
wherein said control system further comprises a signaling device coupled with said at least one data processor, and is configured via the signaling device to output a control signal based on the position data and the sensor data to a fill soil transfer machine,
wherein the at least one data processor is further configured to select a location within the fill area for depositing fill soil and a location within the cut area for obtaining fill soil, based at least in part on the sensor data and the position data, and responsively direct transfer of fill soil with the fill soil transfer machine via the control signal.
2. The control system of
3. The control system of
5. The control system of
6. The control system of
7. The control system of
8. The control system of
9. The control system of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The present disclosure relates generally to techniques and machine systems for preparing earthworks construction sites, and relates more particularly to a process and control strategy for selectively transferring fill soil between work areas via the use of soil moisture map data.
Road and building construction and many other earthworks projects can require transferring relatively large amounts of soil from one location to another. In some instances, the topography of a worksite needs to be altered by leveling the native soil, removing it, depositing soil in certain areas, etc. The project may specify a particular site topography for engineering purposes, land architecture or even aesthetics. Similarly, factors such as the lift thickness of sequentially deposited layers of fill soil, soil composition and moisture content may need to be strictly controlled. Numerous different machines such as compactors, tractors, haul trucks, scrapers, excavators, soil remediation machines and many others may all be used in preparing site topography and working soil in a given project. A site manager is often tasked with orchestrating the operation of all of these machines, with a premium placed on meeting deadlines, minimizing downtime and maximizing efficiency and quality. It will thus be appreciated that the overall process of preparing a worksite can be quite complex and demanding work.
Engineers and other individuals involved in earthworks construction practices have long recognized that soil moisture content tends to relate to the suitability of soil to serve as a supporting substrate or otherwise remain stable over time. The relative ease of working soil in anticipation of its end use, such as by compacting, may also be affected by moisture content. Overly dry soil may undergo physical changes as time passes and moisture penetrates, compromising the soil's integrity as a supporting substrate. Wet soil can likewise shift or otherwise become unstable over time. It may also be difficult to achieve proper compaction of soils having improper moisture content, though the resulting problems may not become apparent until later. Achieving an optimum moisture content in fill soil is thus preferred, and often critical, to a project's long-term success.
As mentioned above, site preparation for many earthworks projects can require transferring relatively large volumes of soil from one location to another. It is common for site engineers to select a “cut area” for obtaining fill soil, and a “fill area” where transferred fill soil is to be deposited. Fill soil is typically transferred via haul trucks or scraper machines from a cut area to a fill area in stages, each time laying down a layer or “lift” of soil which is subsequently compacted with compactor machines to a presumably proper compaction state. If soil having an improper moisture content, e.g. too wet or too dry, is deposited in one or more of the lifts, however, labor intensive re-working of the soil is often required. Soil which is too dry may be moistened by spraying water on the soil with a water truck. Soil which is too wet is often disked to mix it and increase the available surface area for ambient drying. Discerning whether soil has the appropriate moisture content prior to its deposition, however, has heretofore been challenging or impossible in most instances.
Present practice is therefore to measure soil moisture at the end of a construction phase, for example with moisture/density meters. Such meters are used to determine whether the relative amount of water within a certain sample of soil is either too high or too low, and can determine the overall density of a sample. If the soil is not at a desired moisture content or not compacted sufficiently, the aforementioned reworking techniques are typically used, and the soil once again compacted. Rework of already laid soil to obtain an appropriate moisture content consumes a substantial proportion of manpower and resources in many earthworks projects. It also reduces the economic viability for contractors and takes time. It will thus be readily apparent that advances in soil moisture control and/or monitoring prior to depositing soil at a fill site would be welcomed in the construction industry.
The present disclosure is directed to one or more of the problems or shortcomings set forth above.
In one aspect, the present disclosure provides a system for preparing a worksite. The system includes at least one machine having at least one sensor mounted thereon which is configured to sense a parameter indicative of a moisture content of soil. The system further includes a receiver configured to receive position data of at least one of a cut area and a fill area, and a signaling device configured to output signals corresponding to the position data and data from the at least one sensor. The system still further includes at least one transfer machine configured to selectively transfer fill soil between the cut area and the fill area based at least in part on said signals.
In another aspect, the present disclosure provides a control system comprising at least one data processor, the at least one data processor being configured to receive sensor data from at least one sensor indicative of a moisture content of soil. The at least one data processor is further configured to receive position data of at least one of a cut area and a fill area. The control system further comprises a signaling device configured to output control signals based on the position data and the sensor data to a fill soil transfer machine.
In still another aspect, the present disclosure provides a method of preparing a worksite. The method includes receiving soil moisture data for soil of at least one of a cut area and a fill area, and receiving position data for at least one of a cut area and a fill area. The method further includes outputting at least one signal corresponding to the soil moisture data and the position data, and selecting at least one of, a location within a cut area for obtaining fill soil with a transfer machine and a location within a fill area for depositing fill soil with a transfer machine, based at least in part on the at least one signal.
Referring to
In one embodiment, certain of the activities of machines 12 and 50 may be monitored and/or controlled at a base station 40. Base station 40 may include at least one data processor such as a computer 48 configured to receive data transmitted from machines 50 and/or 12. In one contemplated embodiment, a site manager or computer 48 may operate from base station 40 to render decisions and output control signals for machine navigation. Navigation of machine 12 may be controlled or directed from base station 40 based at least in part on soil moisture map data obtained via machine 50. Thus, base station 40 may serve as a communication link between machines 50 and 12, or other machines of system 10.
Other operations such as soil conditioning via disking or water spraying of soil in situ, or mixing of fill soil loads, for example, may also be directed from base station 40. Additional scrapers and other transfer machines, tractors, water trucks and a variety of other construction machines may be in communication with a site manager at base station 40, or computer 48, such that their movements and activities can be monitored and directed with the benefit of soil moisture map data. It is further emphasized that the illustration of system 10 in
As alluded to above, base station 40 may be used to receive data from machines 50 and/or 12. To this end, base station 40 may include a receiver 44 configured to receive data from machine 50. In one embodiment, soil moisture map data may be received from machine 50 via receiver 44. Receiver 44 may be coupled with computer 48 such that soil moisture map data received from machine 50 may be recorded in a memory of computer 48, for example in a database. After material is removed from a cut area or deposited in a fill area, additional soil moisture map data for the respective area may be obtained, and the soil moisture map data in the database updated. In still other instances, additional soil moisture map data may be used to increase the resolution of soil moisture map data stored in the database associated with computer 48. Base station 40 may further include a local GPS receiver 42 to enable relatively more accurate positioning information than that available with satellite-based GPS alone. A signaling device such as a transmitter 46 coupled with computer 48 may also be located at base station 40 to permit transmission of signals to control or direct activities of machine 12. Transmitter 46 might also be part of a simple radio communication link to allow a site manager to direct one or more of the machines of system 10 to take particular actions. While many earthworks construction projects will be undertaken with the use of a base station 40, it should be appreciated that in other versions of system 10, data processing, storage, manager decision making, etc. could all take place via one of the machines of system 10. In such an embodiment, rather than transmitting soil moisture map data to base station 40, machine 50 could transmit signals directly to machine 12 to control or direct activities of machine 12 via an on-board transmitter 54 of machine 50. In still further embodiments, rather than wirelessly transmitting soil moisture map data, machine 50 may simply record soil moisture map data which is later downloaded to computer 28, and used in selecting and/or controlling actions of machine 12, or integrated into a site management plan for later reference.
Turning to specific but not limiting elements of other components of system 10, machine 12 may include an operator cab 18 having a display device 20. Machine 12 may also include a first receiver 26 such as a GPS receiver configured to receive position signals whereby a location or relative location of machine 12 may be determined. Machine 12 may also include another receiver 25 for receiving signals transmitted from base station 40. In one embodiment, display device 20 may comprise a graphical display device, further described herein, whereas in other embodiments display device 20 might comprise a lamp or LED, for example, configured to convey information in an operator-perceptible manner. Display device 20 may also be configured to indicate at least one of, a selected location within a fill area for depositing fill soil and a selected location within a cut area for obtaining fill soil, responsive to signals transmitted from base station 40. This will enable an operator for machine 12 to follow directions received from base station 40 by viewing them on display device 20. Indicating such a selected location may take place via graphics, brightness, color, blinking areas, etc. of a map displayed on display device 20 for a given work area. Where a base station is not used, display device 20 could function by receiving signals directly from machine 50. In either case, system 10 will typically include a signaling device at one of base station 40 and machine 50 for outputting a signal to machine 12 which prompts generation of a particular display via display device 20. Machine 12 may further include a data processor 30 coupled with transmitter 24 and with receivers 25 and 26 via one or more communication lines 29, and coupled with display device 20 via another communication line 23.
Returning now to certain aspects of machine 50, the at least one sensor 64 of machine 50 may comprise a non-contact sensor configured to sense a parameter indicative of a moisture content of soil. In one embodiment, sensor 64 may comprise a microwave sensor configured to scan moisture content of soil without contacting the soil as machine 50 moves within a work area, for example a sensor of the type available from Hydronix, of Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom. In other embodiments, commercially available contact soil moisture sensors may be used, a variety of which are commercially available. Machine 50 may further include a receiver 56 configured to receive position data indicative of a location of machine 50 within a work area, receiver 56 being mounted on an operator cab 58. Machine 50 may be a mobile machine having a frame 52 whereupon operator cab 58 is mounted, such that an operator can drive machine 50 about a work area to collect soil moisture data via sensor 64. Machine 50 might alternatively consist of an autonomous machine, or might even be a tow behind or hand held implement. A transmitter 54 may further be mounted on machine 50 to output signals corresponding to soil moisture data obtained via sensor 64 and machine position data obtained via receiver 56.
Machine 50 may further include a data processor or computer 60 coupled with sensor 64 via a communication line 62, with receiver 56 via another communication line 57 and with receiver 54 via yet another communication line 59. Computer 60 may thus be configured to receive position signals from receiver 56 and sensor inputs from sensor 64. Computer 60 may also include a memory 63 such as RAM, a hard drive, flash memory, etc. and a memory writing device 61 coupled with memory 63. Computer 60 may thus be used to store soil moisture map data, and update the soil moisture map data by overwriting or supplementing previously acquired data when additional data for a given area is obtained.
Computer 60, memory 61, memory writing device 63, sensor 64, receiver 56, and transmitter 54 may be elements of a control system 70 used in processing soil moisture map data and controlling or directing the operation of machine 12 and other machines which may be part of system 10. Control system 70 is illustrated as being mounted on machine 50, however, it should be appreciated that some or all of the components thereof might be located elsewhere in system 10. For example, memory 61 and memory writing device 63 might be components of computer 28 located at base station 40. Moreover, computer 48, receivers 42 and 44 and transmitter 46, as well as computer 30, display device 20, transmitter 24 and receivers 25 and 26 may all be parts of an integrated control system for system 10. Thus, control system 70 might include a plurality of computers, sensors, receivers and transmitters all in communication with one another, the location of which may vary substantially in system 10. In still other embodiments, a single data processor might be configured to receive soil moisture map data, select an appropriate fill and/or cut location and output a control signal based on the soil moisture map data to a transfer machine adapted to selectively transfer fill soil based on the control signal.
Referring also now to
Soil moisture may vary significantly and even irregularly across a given work area, depending upon such factors as soil type, slope, elevation, etc. Soil moisture mapping could therefore result in relatively complex soil moisture maps. Accordingly, it may be desirable to group different regions of a work area having different, but similar moisture content together. In other words, in some instances it may be most useful to divide a given work area into zones based on an average moisture content. In
Also illustrated in
Each of scraper machines 12a and 12b may therefore obtain fill soil loads having average moisture contents near optimum. In such cases, the fill soil load may be deposited at work area W2 generally anywhere that fill soil is needed. In some instances, however, soil moisture mapping at the fill area may also be considered in selecting where to deposit fill soil loads with machines 12a and 12b.
It should be appreciated that while in certain embodiments, soil moisture maps might be generated for both of work areas W1 and W2, in other embodiments soil moisture mapping of only one of the respective work areas might take place. Moreover, mapping of the fill area might be undertaken prior to depositing fill soil, or only after fill soil has been deposited. Embodiments are also contemplated wherein soil moisture maps are updated after fill soil has been removed and/or after fill soil has been deposited. In such cases, machines 50a and 50b may be moved about the corresponding work area after fill/deposition with machines 12a and 12b, and additional soil moisture map data transmitted to base station 40. Following updating the soil moisture maps, different moisture contents of different zones may be revealed, and a different transfer strategy formulated on the basis of the updated maps.
Referring now to
Referring to
From Step 120, process 100 may proceed to Step 125 wherein a machine such as machine 50 or another machine is moved within a second area, one of areas W1 and W2 for example. From Step 125, process 100 may proceed to step 130 wherein soil moisture data for the second area is received. From Step 130, process 100 may proceed to Step 135 to receive position data indicative of soil locations within the second area.
In Step 140 and Step 145, once the necessary soil moisture and position data is received, soil moisture maps for the first area and the second area, respectively, may be generated. As described herein, the present disclosure is not limited to generating soil moisture maps via any particular device of system 10. For instance, the soil moisture map might be generated via computer 60 and displayed on a display screen of machine 50 or machine 12. The soil moisture maps might alternatively be generated via computer 48, and displayed at station 40. The map data might also be stored in memory, and used in directing operations of system 10 without actually displaying a map anywhere. As mentioned above, machine 12 could also serve as a machine to acquire soil moisture and position data and generate the appropriate maps. Following generating the soil moisture maps, and displaying the corresponding maps, process 100 may proceed to Step 150 to select a cut and/or fill location based on the soil moisture maps. In one embodiment, it is contemplated that a site manager at station 40 would be provided with soil moisture maps displayed via computer 48 of each of cut area W1 and fill area W2. The site manager could then make an appropriate decision as to what soil to move where, based on comparing the respective maps. Comparison of maps or soil moisture map data may also be performed via one of the computers of system 10.
From Step 150, process 100 may proceed to Step 155 wherein a soil moisture map is displayed on a machine-mounted display device such as display device 20. From Step 155, process 100 may proceed to Step 160 to indicate a selected cut/fill location via the display device. In this fashion, a machine operator such as an operator driving machine 12, can be directed to follow a particular route, cut and/or fill at a particular location, etc. From Step 160, process 100 may proceed to Step 165 to transfer a fill soil load between cut area W1 and fill area W2. From Step 165, process 100 may proceed to Step 170 to query whether the project or construction phase is complete. If at Step 170, fill soil transfer is not complete, process 100 may proceed to Step 175. If yes, process 100 may Finish at Step 185. In other words, at Step 170, soil moisture mapping and related activities may be suspended if transferring fill soil is no longer necessary, or is contemplated to be unnecessary for some time.
If fill soil transfer is to continue, at Step 175, additional soil moisture data and additional position data for the cut area and/or the fill area may be received. The additional soil moisture and position data may be obtained by again moving machine 50 within one of work areas W1 and W2. It is contemplated that removing fill soil from a particular area, as well as depositing fill soil at a particular area, may cause the soil moisture map(s) to change. Accordingly, once the additional data is received, at Step 180 the soil moisture maps may be updated on the basis thereof. From Step 180, process 100 may return to Step 150 to select a cut and/or fill location based on the updated soil moisture maps, and may then loop back through steps 155-170.
The present disclosure provides an altogether new strategy for selectively transferring fill soil between a cut area and a work area. This approach is contemplated to provide pertinent soil moisture data to a site manager or a computer such that soil having an appropriate moisture content may be deposited where it is most advantageous. In other words, dry soil might be deposited on top of wet soil, wet soil might be deposited on top of dry soil. Wet soils and dry soils may even be combined in a single fill soil load and mixed prior to or after deposition. By providing the relevant information beforehand, end result testing and rework associated with end result testing will be substantially reduced over current practice, or even eliminated. The overall quality of the construction project will be improved, and the time and effort required for quality assurance will likewise be improved over past practices. Whether the planning and implementation of an earthworks project is achieved via a single machine operated as described herein, or a large group of machines, the present disclosures promises dramatic improvements over the current state of the art.
It should further be appreciated that while the present disclosure discusses a relatively small number of steps in a worksite preparation process, a construction phase may involve the transfer of many fill soil loads, and moisture maps for one or both of the cut area and the fill area may be generated, resolved and/or updated numerous times. Each time soil moisture map data is acquired, subtle or significant changes in planning may take place. Moreover, worksite preparation may require many days of work, and the soil moisture content for a given area may change due to precipitation and ambient drying, as well as the removal or deposition of fill soil. The present disclosure enables monitoring of soil moisture in real time such that any changes in soil moisture content may be accounted for in an overall worksite preparation plan.
The present description is for illustrative purposes only, and should not be construed to narrow the breadth of the present disclosure in any way. Thus, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications might be made to the presently disclosed embodiments without departing from the full and fair scope of the present disclosure. For example, while many construction projects transfer fill soil between relatively close cut and fill areas with scraper machines, the present disclosure is not thereby limited. In other embodiments, intermediary haul trucks might be used to transfer fill soil between relatively more remote locations for which soil moisture maps are generated. Rather than scrapers, loaders might be used in transferring soil, for example by loading a haul truck with fill soil from a location selected via the use of a soil moisture map. Thus, it will be readily apparent that a relatively large fleet of construction machines could have their operation controlled, monitored, influenced and tracked for the purpose of optimally transferring fill soil between locations. Other aspects, features and advantages will be apparent from an examination of the attached drawings and appended claims.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10718099, | Dec 29 2017 | Leveling, tune-up and compacting device | |
| 10954651, | Aug 02 2016 | Komatsu Ltd. | Control system for work vehicle, control method, and work vehicle |
| 11252860, | Nov 13 2018 | INC , BLUE LEAF I | Agricultural product control system for an agricultural implement |
| 11477933, | Nov 14 2018 | BLUE LEAF I P , INC | Trench detection system for an agricultural implement |
| 8897973, | May 28 2010 | EFC SYSTEMS, INC | System and method for collecting and processing agricultural field data |
| 9173337, | Oct 19 2009 | EFC SYSTEMS, INC | GNSS optimized control system and method |
| 9176489, | Feb 07 2013 | Control apparatus for automating the operation of machinery | |
| 9234317, | Sep 25 2013 | Caterpillar Inc.; Caterpillar Inc | Robust system and method for forecasting soil compaction performance |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3625303, | |||
| 3775019, | |||
| 4467652, | Nov 26 1980 | GEODYNAMIK H THURNER AB | Procedure and device for compaction measurement |
| 4600997, | May 09 1983 | SPECTRA PRECISION, INC | Surveying system |
| 4892113, | Feb 03 1986 | Spectrum 2000, Inc. | Moisture monitor and control system |
| 5426972, | Apr 20 1993 | Gas Technology Institute | Monitoring soil compaction |
| 5471391, | Dec 08 1993 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for operating compacting machinery relative to a work site |
| 5477459, | Mar 06 1992 | CLEGG, PHILIP M | Real time three-dimensional machine locating system |
| 5493494, | Dec 08 1993 | Caterpillar, Inc.; Caterpillar Inc | Method and apparatus for operating compacting machinery relative to a work site |
| 5524560, | Dec 09 1994 | The United States of America as represented by the Department of | System for controlling vertical displacement of agricultural implements into the soil |
| 5631658, | Sep 13 1995 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for operating geography-altering machinery relative to a work site |
| 5646844, | Apr 18 1994 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for real-time monitoring and coordination of multiple geography altering machines on a work site |
| 5663649, | Jun 02 1995 | HER MAJESTY IN RIGHT OF CANADA AS REPRESENTED BY AGRICULTURE AND AGRI-FOOD CANADA | Soil penetrometer |
| 5727900, | Oct 14 1993 | GOEODYNAMIK HT AKTIEBOLAG | Control of a compacting machine with a measurement of the characteristics of the ground material |
| 5850341, | Jun 30 1994 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for monitoring material removal using mobile machinery |
| 5902343, | Nov 22 1996 | CNH America LLC; BLUE LEAF I P , INC | Automatic scaling of GPS field maps |
| 5942679, | Apr 29 1993 | GOEODYNAMIK HT AKTIEBOLAG | Compaction index |
| 6029106, | Nov 22 1996 | CNH America LLC; BLUE LEAF I P , INC | Global position correction for the electronic display of field maps |
| 6041582, | Feb 20 1998 | CNH America LLC; BLUE LEAF I P , INC | System for recording soil conditions |
| 6044324, | Dec 03 1997 | Rockwell Collins, Inc.; Rockwell Collins, Inc | System approach to stand-alone soil sampling |
| 6061618, | Nov 22 1996 | CNH America LLC; BLUE LEAF I P , INC | Panning display of GPS field maps |
| 6085130, | Jul 22 1998 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for selecting a transition scheme for use in transitioning a mobile machine from a first path to a second path |
| 6088644, | Aug 12 1998 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining a path to be traversed by a mobile machine |
| 6122601, | Feb 20 1997 | PENN STATE RESEARCH FOUNDATION, THE | Compacted material density measurement and compaction tracking system |
| 6188942, | Jun 04 1999 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining the performance of a compaction machine based on energy transfer |
| 6216071, | Dec 16 1998 | Caterpillar Inc. | Apparatus and method for monitoring and coordinating the harvesting and transporting operations of an agricultural crop by multiple agricultural machines on a field |
| 6349775, | Nov 07 1997 | Maasland, N..V. | Means for controlling a driven soil working machine on the basis of information derived from a map |
| 6389360, | Jan 13 1999 | Vermeer Manufacturing Company | Automated bore planning method and apparatus for horizontal directional drilling |
| 6408960, | Jan 23 1997 | YANMAR CO , LTD | Mobile agricultural machine |
| 6421990, | May 19 1999 | Deere & Company | Measuring device for measuring components in and/or properties of crop material |
| 6460006, | Dec 22 1998 | Caterpillar Inc | System for predicting compaction performance |
| 6510367, | Dec 12 1996 | AG-CHEM EQUIPMENT CO INC | Delay coordinating system for a system of operatively coupled agricultural machines |
| 6741949, | Dec 11 2001 | Caterpillar Inc | Real time pavement profile indicator |
| 6749029, | Jan 13 1999 | Vermeer Manufacturing Company | Automated bore planning method and apparatus for horizontal directional drilling |
| 6751540, | Oct 10 2001 | Caterpillar Inc | Method and apparatus for design placement for earthmoving applications |
| 6880643, | Feb 07 2002 | NOVARIANT, INC | System and method for land-leveling |
| 6937939, | Jul 08 1999 | National University Corporation Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology | Soil measuring instrument, soil measurement assisting device and method, recorded medium on which a program is recorded, recorded medium on which data is recorded, application amount controller, application amount determining device, method for them, and farm working determination assisting system |
| 6973821, | Feb 19 2004 | Caterpillar Inc. | Compaction quality assurance based upon quantifying compactor interaction with base material |
| 7623951, | Apr 06 2006 | Caterpillar Inc. | Machine and method of determining suitability of work material for compaction |
| 7731450, | Sep 07 2006 | Caterpillar Inc. | Method of operating a compactor machine via path planning based on compaction state data and mapping information |
| 20030069668, | |||
| 20040050187, | |||
| 20050158129, | |||
| 20050194461, | |||
| 20070239336, | |||
| 20070268852, | |||
| 20080004809, | |||
| 20080202777, | |||
| EP1571515, | |||
| WO9530880, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Feb 26 2007 | CORCORAN, PAUL T | Caterpillar Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019005 | /0362 | |
| Feb 28 2007 | Caterpillar Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Aug 25 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Aug 21 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Aug 18 2022 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Mar 15 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Sep 15 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Mar 15 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Mar 15 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Mar 15 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Sep 15 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Mar 15 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Mar 15 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Mar 15 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Sep 15 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Mar 15 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Mar 15 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |