The invention relates to a demodulator circuit in a communication system using a multi-carrier modulation scheme. The demodulator uses channel state information for respective carriers in the multi-carrier modulation to de-map the received data.
|
8. An electronic signal processor comprising:
a system for electronically determining provisional decision data, based on a detected sub-carrier position relative to a constellation grid;
a system for electronically allowing the provisional decision data to remain the same if channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is less than a first threshold;
said first threshold value being set relative to a mean channel state information of a plurality of sub-carriers; and
a system for adjusting the provisional decision data by a first predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the first threshold, wherein the provisional decision data is adjusted by a second predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than a second threshold and less than a third threshold.
1. A method of determining decision data for an information signal on a sub-carrier of a multi-carrier modulated signal using an electronic signal processor, the method comprising:
electronically determining provisional decision data, based on a detected sub-carrier position relative to a constellation grid; and
electronically allowing the provisional decision data to remain the same if channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is less than a first threshold, comprising adjusting the provisional decision data by a predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the first threshold and less than a second threshold, wherein the provisional decision data is adjusted by a second predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the second threshold and less than a third threshold;
said first threshold value being set relative to a mean channel state information of a plurality of sub-carriers.
12. An electronic signal processor comprising:
a system for electronically determining provisional decision data, based on a detected sub-carrier position relative to a constellation grid;
a system for electronically allowing the provisional decision data to remain the same if channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is less than a first threshold, said first threshold value being set relative to a mean channel state information of a plurality of sub-carriers; and
a system for adjusting the provisional decision data by a first predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the first threshold, wherein the provisional decision data is adjusted by a second predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than a second threshold and less than a third threshold, and wherein the provisional decision data is adjusted by a third predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the third threshold.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
allowing the provisional decision data to remain the same if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is less than the first threshold that is greater than the mean channel state information of the plurality of sub-carriers; and
adjusting the provisional decision data by a first predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the first threshold.
6. The method of
7. The method of
9. The system of
10. The electronic signal processor of
11. The electronic signal processor of
a system for allowing the provisional decision data to remain the same if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is less than the first threshold that is greater than the mean channel state information of the plurality of sub-carriers; and
a system for adjusting the provisional decision data by the first predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the first threshold.
13. The electronic signal processor of
14. The electronic signal processor of
15. The electronic signal processor of
a system for allowing the provisional decision data to remain the same if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is less than the first threshold that is greater than the mean channel state information of the plurality of sub-carriers; and
a system for adjusting the provisional decision data by the first predetermined amount if the channel state information for the respective sub-carrier is greater than the first threshold.
|
1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates to a demodulator circuit in a communication system using a multi-carrier modulation scheme. The invention relates in particular to the effective demodulation of a received signal in a COFDM demodulator for a digital television receiver.
2. Related Art
Recently there has been a rapid development in the field of digital television broadcasting following the establishment of the European Digital Video Broadcast standard for digital terrestrial television (DVB-T) developed by the Digital Video Broadcasting Group.
In accordance with the DVB-T standard, a number of carrier frequencies are provided and data to be transmitted is spread over a large number of orthogonal data carriers using Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing (COFDM).
Each carrier can be encoded to carry a symbol containing more than one bit, for example by using a rectangular constellation modulation system such as 16-QAM, as is known to a skilled person.
An exemplary 16-QAM constellation diagram is shown in
At the transmitter the carriers are modulated in accordance with successive symbols to be transmitted and each received signal is demodulated in the receiver to the corresponding symbol using the constellation diagram. In most cases the signal received will not correspond exactly with a constellation point because of interference or noise in the channel between the transmitter and the receiver. In this situation the receiver must demodulate the received signal to the symbol corresponding to the constellation point which is most likely to have been transmitted.
It is known to de-map signals using soft decision decoding in which, instead of a “hard” decision as to whether a bit should be decoded as a “1” or as a “0”, a soft decision, comprising the “hard” decision and an indication of the level of confidence to be placed in the decision is output.
In simple systems the level of confidence which can be placed on the demodulated or de-mapped information is proportional to the distance or separation of the received signal from the expected constellation point. Clearly, the closer the received signal is to a constellation point, the more confidence can be placed in the de-mapped symbol.
When Gray coding is used, the level of confidence that can be placed in a particular de-mapped bit varies from bit to bit within the symbol.
The information from the de-mapper is passed to a viterbi decoder which decodes the bits.
This soft decision information can be input into a soft decision Viterbi decoder. A soft decision Viterbi decoder maintains a history of many possible transmitted sequences and builds up a view of their relative likelihoods. The Viterbi decoder selects a ‘0’ or a ‘1’ as the decoded bit based on the maximum likelihood. In this way the Viterbi decoder can exploit information relating to the expected reliability of each bit based on the proximity of each bit to the expected constellation point.
One problem with television broadcasting is the existence of multi-paths arising either as a result of the reception at the receiver of multiple copies of the signal emitted from a single transmitter, or as a result of the reception of signals from a number of transmitters all broadcasting the same signal. In the frequency domain, the existence of multi-paths is equivalent to a frequency selective channel response.
Furthermore, in situations where conventional analog television signals are transmitted within or overlapping the frequency range used by the digital television signal, the conventional analog television signals act as narrow interfering signals within the signal bandwidth of the digital television signal.
This frequency selective channel response characteristic results in the large number of different carriers used in COFDM modulation having different signal to noise ratios (SNR). Clearly, data conveyed by carriers having a high SNR is likely to be more reliable than data conveyed by carriers having a low SNR.
An estimate of the SNR of each carrier made by the receiver is called the channel state information (CSI) for the channel represented by that carrier.
One known method of establishing channel state information for a COFDM signal is disclosed in the article “A demapping method using the pilots in COFDM system” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol 44 No. 3 August '98 pp 1150-1153. This method utilizes the fact that pilot carriers with known magnitudes are transmitted with the COFDM signal, for equalization purposes. An estimate is made of the mean square error in the magnitude of the received pilot carriers and channel state information in the pilot carrier positions can be obtained from this estimate. The channel state information in useful data positions can be obtained by subsequent interpolation between the values calculated at the pilot carrier frequencies.
In order to provide robust performance of the system in an environment having a frequency selective channel response, it is known to use the channel state information in the Viterbi decoder when decoding the bits in order to provide extra information regarding the reliability of the bits based on the signal to noise ratio of the carrier.
The article “Performance analysis of Viterbi Decoder using channel state information in COFDM System” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, Vol 44 No. 4 15 December 1998 pp 488-496, describes a Viterbi decoder which uses Channel State Information calculated from a mean square estimation of the received pilot carrier signals in a COFDM system, to affect the Viterbi decoder branch metric values used to decode 3 or 4 bit soft decision data.
Previously it has also been suggested that if the channel state information of a particular channel is sufficiently bad, it can be concluded that no reliance can be placed on the data received on that channel. As a result, the Viterbi decoder may effectively record that no information is available regarding that bit by disregarding, or “puncturing” the corresponding bit or bits.
The transmitted data is coded using a convolutional code, which introduces redundancy in the signal in order to allow error correction of the signal to be achieved. The effect of the puncturing of data bits in the Viterbi decoder as indicated above, is merely to reduce the effective code rate of the signal. If a sufficiently robust code is used, the effective reduction in code rate resulting from the puncturing of bits can be tolerated, thus avoiding an impact on the decoded signal quality.
Previously known demodulator circuits are complex since the calculated channel state information must be fed forward to the Viterbi decoder through the deinterleaver. However, this requires a relatively large amount of data to be passed through the deinterleaver.
The present invention provides means for demapping data effectively using channel state information.
In accordance with a first aspect of the invention, there is provided as claims.
For a better understanding of the present invention, and to show how it may be brought into effect, reference will now be made, by way of example, to the accompanying drawings, in which:
An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The demodulator circuit consists of a de-mapping block 1, a bit and symbol de-interleaving block 2 and a Viterbi decoder 3. The received de-modulated signal is applied to the input of the de-mapping block 1 and the de-mapping block 1 de-maps the received signal and outputs decision data comprising an estimate of the transmitted data together with an indication of the level of confidence to be placed in the estimate. The decision data output from the de-mapping block 1 is input to the bit and symbol de-interleaving block 2. The de-interleaved decision data is input to the viterbi decoder 3 which generates a demodulated output based on the input decision data.
The de-mapping block 1 comprises channel state information (CSI) calculation block 11 in addition to a de-mapper 12. The CSI calculation block 11 determines the channel state information for each carrier used in the multi-carrier modulated signal. The channel state information calculated by the CSI calculation block 11 is used by the de-mapper 12 to generate decision data for a received signal using that carrier in a manner dependent on the channel state information for the respective carrier.
The channel state information may be calculated in a number of ways, including ways known from the state of the art.
Specifically, the CSI values established as outlined above are used in the establishment of the soft decision data to be used during de-mapping of each item of data in the de-mapping block 1 shown in
A method for de-mapping data in the de-mapping block 1 shown in
Firstly, the average value of the CSI, over all of the COFDM subchannels, is calculated. This is shown as A in
On receipt of a signal to be demodulated, soft decision values are assigned in connection with each of the transmitted information bits, depending on the distance of the signal from the neighboring constellation points. For example, the received sub-carrier shown at point B in
In this illustrated embodiment, a four bit soft decision value is available. Thus, each soft decision value is a number from 0 to 15, with a value of 0 indicating maximum confidence that the information bit has a binary value of 0, and a value of 15 indicating maximum confidence that the information bit has a binary value of 1, with intermediate values indicating corresponding levels of confidence in the binary value of the information bit.
As mentioned above, the received sub-carrier shown at point B in
In the case of the third most significant bit, a soft decision value is assigned, based on the position of point B along a horizontal axis between the vertical lines A2-A4 and A1-A3. Based on the illustrated position of point B, a provisional soft decision value of 12 is assigned, indicating that the information bit is somewhat more likely to be a 1 than a O.
Similarly, in the case of the fourth most significant bit, a soft decision value is assigned, based on the position of point B along a vertical axis between the horizontal lines A2-A1 and A4-A3. Based on the illustrated position of point B, a provisional soft decision value of 6 is assigned, indicating that the information bit is slightly more likely to be a 0 than a 1.
Based on the CSI value for the carrier, these provisionally assigned soft decision values can then be reconsidered.
Thus, as shown in
If the CSI value is greater than the first threshold T1 in step 1, the CSI value is compared to a second, higher, threshold T2 in step 3. If T1<CSI value<T2, the carrier can be considered to have a slightly worse signal to noise ratio. In this situation, the process passes to step 4. In this case, the provisionally determined soft decision value is moved two levels towards the centre of the range. Thus, in the illustrated case, the soft decision value assigned to the third information bit of the sub-carrier B would be changed from the provisionally determined value of 12 to a value of 10.
If the CSI value is greater than the second threshold T2 in step 3, the CSI value is compared to a third, yet higher, threshold T3 in step 5. If T2<CSI value<T3, the carrier can be considered to have a relatively bad signal to noise ratio. In this situation, the process passes to step 6. In this case, the provisionally determined soft decision value is moved four levels towards the centre of the range. Thus, in the illustrated case, the soft decision value assigned to the third information bit of the sub-carrier B would be changed from the provisionally determined value of 12 to a value of 8.
Finally, if the CSI value is greater than the third threshold T3, the carrier can be considered to have a sufficiently bad signal to noise ratio that very little reliance can be placed on the decoded bits. In this situation, the process passes to step 6. In this case, the provisionally determined soft decision value can be moved six levels towards the centre of the range. Thus, in the illustrated case, this would suggest that the soft decision value assigned to the signal B would be changed from the provisionally determined value of 12 to a value of 6.
However, in all of steps 4, 6 and 8, no new soft decision value should be applied which is on the opposite side of the midpoint of the range. Thus, when a provisionally determined soft decision value is 7 or less, the amended soft decision value is not made greater than 7. Similarly, when a provisionally determined soft decision value is 8 or more, the amended soft decision value is not made less than 8.
Thus, in the illustrated case, even if the CSI value is very high, the soft decision value assigned to the third information bit of the sub-carrier B is changed only to a value of 8, because it is still slightly more likely that the third information bit should be a 1 rather than a O.
In accordance with the invention, therefore, the channel state information is incorporated by the de-mapper 12 in the decision data, and all the CSI functions are contained within the de-mapping block 1. As a result it is not necessary to pass channel state information through the de-interleaving process to the Viterbi decoder as separate information, resulting in reduced data path widths and reduced power requirements.
Thus a preferable demodulator circuit for demodulating a multi-carrier modulated signal using channel state information is disclosed.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5134635, | Jul 30 1990 | Motorola, Inc. | Convolutional decoder using soft-decision decoding with channel state information |
6115435, | Oct 31 1996 | Kabushiki Kaisha Toshiba | Soft decision method and receiver |
6603734, | Jun 26 1997 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Method for eliminating interference in an OFDM radio receiver |
6662337, | Oct 30 1998 | AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LIMITED | Digital transmission system and method |
6754291, | Mar 12 1999 | NEC Corp | Method and device of outputting demodulation result in soft-decision decoding and receiver |
6977972, | Jul 12 2000 | Sharp Laboratories of America, Inc. | Method of hybrid soft/hard decision demodulation of signals with multilevel modulation |
EP887975, | |||
GB2340353, | |||
GB2355164, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 28 2000 | Conexant Systems, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 28 2003 | COLLINS, MATTHEW JAMES | Conexant Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 014650 | /0744 | |
Nov 13 2006 | Conexant Systems, Inc | BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 018711 | /0818 | |
Nov 13 2006 | BROOKTREE BROADBAND HOLDING, INC | BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N A , THE | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 018573 | /0337 | |
Nov 13 2006 | Conexant Systems, Inc | THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N A | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SCHEDULE TO SECURITY AGREEMENT FROM BROOKTREE BROADBAND HOLDING, INC AND REMOVE PATENTS APPS LISTED HEREIN FROM AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 018573 FRAME 0337 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT GRANTING A SECURITY INTEREST TO BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N A BY CONEXANT SYSTEMS, INC AT 018711 0818 | 020886 | /0427 | |
Jan 28 2010 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A FORMERLY, THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N A | Conexant Systems, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023998 | /0838 | |
Jan 28 2010 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A FORMERLY, THE BANK OF NEW YORK TRUST COMPANY, N A | BROOKTREE BROADBAND HOLDING, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023998 | /0971 | |
Mar 10 2010 | BROOKTREE BROADBAND HOLDING, INC | THE BANK OF NEW YORK, MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024066 | /0075 | |
Mar 10 2010 | CONEXANT, INC | THE BANK OF NEW YORK, MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024066 | /0075 | |
Mar 10 2010 | CONEXANT SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, INC | THE BANK OF NEW YORK, MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024066 | /0075 | |
Mar 10 2010 | Conexant Systems, Inc | THE BANK OF NEW YORK, MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024066 | /0075 | |
Jul 12 2013 | LAKESTAR SEMI INC | Conexant Systems, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038803 | /0693 | |
Jul 12 2013 | Conexant Systems, Inc | LAKESTAR SEMI INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038777 | /0885 | |
Mar 10 2014 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | BROOKTREE BROADBAND HOLDING, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038631 | /0452 | |
Mar 10 2014 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | CONEXANT SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038631 | /0452 | |
Mar 10 2014 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | CONEXANT, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038631 | /0452 | |
Mar 10 2014 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N A | Conexant Systems, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038631 | /0452 | |
Mar 20 2017 | Conexant Systems, Inc | Conexant Systems, LLC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 042986 | /0613 | |
Sep 01 2017 | Conexant Systems, LLC | Synaptics Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 043786 | /0267 | |
Sep 27 2017 | Synaptics Incorporated | Wells Fargo Bank, National Association | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 044037 | /0896 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 18 2011 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 22 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 06 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 22 2022 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 22 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 22 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 22 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 22 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 22 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 22 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 22 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 22 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |