A method for testing performance of a magnetic head slider includes the steps of: (1) rotating the disk and positioning the slider over the rotating disk at an initial fly-height; (2) exciting the fly-height actuator to make the slider touch the disk and recording a touch down spacing of the read head of the slider; (3) backing off the slider at a predetermined backoff amount from the disk; (4) testing dynamic performance of the slider to obtain a reference value which is related to the spacing between the disk and the slider; (5) varying the initial fly-height of the slider; (6) repeating the steps (2) to (4) with the backoff amount fixed; and (7) calculating a dynamic fly-height gamma ratio based at least in part on the recorded touch down spacing and the obtained reference values.
|
1. A method for testing performance of a magnetic head slider used in a disk drive unit having a rotatable disk, a read head incorporated in the slider for reading data from the disk, and a fly-height actuator for changing spacing between the disk and the slider, the method comprising the steps of:
(1) rotating the disk and positioning the slider over the rotating disk at an initial fly-height;
(2) exciting the fly-height actuator to make the slider touch the disk and recording a touch down spacing of the read head of the slider;
(3) backing off the slider at a predetermined backoff amount from the disk;
(4) testing dynamic performance of the slider to obtain a reference value which is related to the spacing between the disk and the slider;
(5) varying the initial fly-height of the slider;
(6) repeating the steps (2) to (4) with the backoff amount fixed; and
(7) calculating a dynamic fly-height gamma ratio based at least in part on the recorded touch down spacing and the obtained reference values.
2. The method as claimed in
3. The method as claimed in
adjusting the slider's Load/Gram,
adjusting attitude of the slider,
adjusting z-height of the slider,
varing an air bearing surface pattern of the slider, and/or
varying rotation speed of the disk.
4. The method as claimed in
Delta [reference value]=K*Delta [touch down spacing]*[1/DFH gamma ratio-1] wherein Delta [reference value] denotes the reference value change, K denotes an experimental coefficient, Delta [touch down spacing] denotes the touch down spacing change, and “DFH gamma ratio” denotes the dynamic fly-height gamma ratio.
5. The method as claimed in
6. The method as claimed in
7. The method as claimed in
9. The method as claimed in
|
The present invention relates to an information recording disk drive device with a fly-height actuator for controlling the spacing between the slider and the disk, and more particularly to a method for testing performance of a magnetic head slider used in the disk drive device in actual flying case which greatly benefits on slider design in optimizing both head-disk interference (HDI) and performance.
Disk drive devices are information storage devices that use magnetic media to store data and a movable slider with a read/write head positioned over the magnetic media to selectively read data from and write data to the magnetic media.
The clearance or spacing between the slider and the disk surface, concretely between a “minfly point” of the slider and the disk surface, is called fly-height, wherein the “minfly point” of the slider is the point which most closes to the disk surface. The flying dynamics of the slider and the fly-height are influenced by factors such as the rotation speed of the disk, the aerodynamic shape of the slider's ABS, the load force applied to the slider by the suspension, and the pitch and roll torques applied to the slider by the suspension.
Disk drives have been proposed to use a fly-height actuator for changing the spacing between the slider and the disk surface. One type of fly-height actuator is a thermal actuator with an electrically-resistive heater located on the slider near the read/write head. When current is applied to the heater, the heater expands and causes the read/write head to “protrude” and thus move closer to the disk surface. Other fly-height actuators for moving the read/write head relative to the slider include electrostatic micro-actuators and piezoelectric actuators. Another type of fly-height actuator, also based on thermal, electrostatic or piezoelectric techniques, changes the head-disk spacing by altering the air-flow or the shape of the slider's ABS. The clearance between the slider and the disk can be controlled and maintained by the above-mentioned fly-height actuators.
Due to the recent trend of high capacity, high density, and compact disk drive devices, there has been a corresponding increase in bit density in a tangential direction measured in bits-per-inch (BPI) and track density in a radial direction measured in tracks-per-inch (TPI), thereby requiring more delicate operations relative to the control of the disk drive devices.
Though the clearance between the slider and the disk can be maintained by the fly-height actuator, the spacing between the read head and the disk surface can not be kept the same because the read head should not be the “minfly point” as it is too sensitive towards mechanical impact. Accordingly, even maintained in the same clearance, different sliders have different performance because of their different read head design.
Typically, to judge the slider, DFH (dynamic fly-height) gamma ratio is a critical parameter that describes the motion of the mechanical minfly point of the slider compared to the read head movement. To clarify the DFH gamma ratio, a term “Rgap spacing loss” is introduced that means the spacing between the read head and the minfly point of the slider when the slider is flying over a rotating disk. The Rgap spacing loss is sensitive to the performance of the slider, especially the read performance. The lower the numerical gamma ratio value is, the larger the gap between the minfly point and the read head is, that is to say, the larger the Rgap spacing loss is. Slider design objective is to achieve a gamma ratio as close as possible to 1. A gamma ratio of 1 would be ideal for tribology and magnetic performance because it keeps the gap between the read head and the minfly point of the slider at a constant value so as to make the spacing between the read head and the disk to be a constant value. Therefore, testing of the DFH Gamma ratio can provide some data on how to improve or optimize the slider.
In the prior art, we can easily model or measure the DFH gamma ratio using AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) or Wyko-DFH protrusion profile. However, they measure the slider in the static condition or without flying media cooling effect, so the gamma ratio measured by the conventional method can not reflect the slider in actual rotating disk case and can not provide accurate data for optimizing the slider. Another current available testing method of the DFH gamma ratio is using resolution to roughly represent the Rgap spacing. Generally, the resolution value is calculated by the following equation:
RESM=TAA(MF)/TAA(LF)
wherein TAA(MF) (Track Average Amplitude of Middle Frequency) is the amplitude of readback signal from the disk under the condition of middle frequency writing, while TAA(LF) (Track Average Amplitude of Low Frequency) is the amplitude of readback signal from the disk under the condition of low frequency writing. However, resolution can be affected by many factors such as reader shield gap and initial PTR (protrude) recess level. Therefore, just using resolution to estimate DFH gamma ratio is not adequate and easily mixes with other factors. The DFH gamma ratio measured by this method is also not accurate.
Hence, it is desired to provide an improved method for testing the DFH gamma ratio of the slider in actual flying case and more accurately.
Accordingly, an objective of the present invention is to provide a method for testing performance of a magnetic head slider used in the disk drive device in actual flying case more accurately which can greatly benefit on head design to optimize both HDI and performance.
To achieve the above-mentioned objective, the present invention provides a method for testing performance of a magnetic head slider used in a disk drive unit having a rotatable disk, a read head incorporated in the slider for reading data from the disk, and a fly-height actuator for changing spacing between the disk and the slider. The method comprises:
(1) rotating the disk and positioning the slider over the rotating disk at an initial fly-height;
(2) exciting the fly-height actuator to make the slider touch the disk and recording a touch down spacing of the read head of the slider;
(3) backing off the slider at a predetermined backoff amount from the disk;
(4) testing dynamic performance of the slider to obtain a reference value which is related to the spacing between the disk and the slider;
(5) varying the initial fly-height of the slider;
(6) repeating the steps (2) to (4) with the backoff amount fixed; and
(7) calculating a dynamic fly-height gamma ratio based at least in part on the recorded touch down spacing and the obtained reference values.
In an embodiment of the method according to the present invention, the step (2) is performed by applying an actuator power to the fly-height actuator, and the step (3) is performed by lowering the actuator power by an amount corresponding to the backoff amount.
Alternatively, the step (5) is performed by means of: adjusting the slider's Load/Gram, adjusting attitude of the slider, adjusting z-height of the slider, varing an air bearing surface pattern of the slider, and/or varying rotation speed of the disk.
In another embodiment of the method according to the present invention, calculating the dynamic fly-height gamma ratio is performed according to the following equation:
Delta[reference value]=K*Delta[touch down spacing]*[1/DFH gamma ratio−1]
wherein Delta [reference value] denotes the reference value change, K denotes an experimental coefficient, Delta [touch down spacing] denotes the touch down spacing change, and “DFH gamma ratio” denotes the dynamic fly-height gamma ratio.
In still another embodiment of the method of the present invention, the step (4) is resolution measurement, the reference value is resolution value, and the resolution value is calculated by the amplitude ratio of middle frequency and low frequency.
Preferably, the value of the coefficient K is obtained by spacing sensitive experiment on resolution and the coefficient K is 2.
In still another embodiment of the method of the present invention, the reference value is pulse-width value.
Alternatively, the fly-height actuator is located on the slider and is one of a thermal actuator, an electrostatic actuator and a piezoelectric actuator.
In comparison with the prior art, the present method tests the DFH gamma ratio of the slider when it is flying over a rotating disk, and uses the change of resolution instead of absolute resolution value, and as the reader shield gap and initial PTR recess level are giving a constant offset of resolution but not contribute to the change of resolution with varying initial fly-height, so the tested DFH gamma ratio according to the present invention is accurate without other factors. Thus, the present method can clearly identify and differentiate out DFH gamma ratio effect in flying media case and, in turn, greatly benefit on slider design in optimizing both head-disk interference (HDI) and performance.
Other aspects, features, and advantages of this invention will become apparent from the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, which are a part of this disclosure and illustrate, by way of example, principles of this invention.
The accompanying drawings facilitate an understanding of the various embodiments of this invention. In such drawings:
Various preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the figures, wherein like reference numerals designate similar parts throughout the various views. As indicated above, the invention is directed to a method for testing performance of a magnetic head slider used in the disk drive device in actual flying case more accurately so as to get a realistic DFH gamma ratio, thereby to optimize the HDI and the performance of the disk drive.
Referring to
The slider also includes a fly-height actuator for changing the spacing between the read/write head 21 and the disk surface 11. The type of fly-height actuator shown in
The fly-height actuator can also be an electrostatic actuator and a piezoelectric actuator. Taken the thermal actuator as an example, the testing method of the present invention will be described in detail in the following text.
The term “touch down” in the text means that the minfly point of the slider 13 is in contact with the disk surface 11, and the term “touch down spacing” denotes the movement of the reader when the slider 13 is in touch down state.
Now the slider 13 is flying over the rotating disk 10 at a fixed fly-height and in this condition testing the dynamic performance of the slider 13 to obtain a reference value M1, which is step (114). As an exemplary embodiment, resolution value is used as the reference value.
Next, change the initial fly-height of the slider by one way of adjusting the slider's Load/Gram, attitude, z-height, and/or the rotation speed of the disk, which is step (115), and repeat the steps (112) and (114) to obtain another touch down spacing value, recorded as touch down spacing (2), and another reference value M2, which is step (116).
Finally, calculating the DFH gamma ratio based on the reference values M1, M2 and the touch down spacing values with the equation (1):
Now the principle and the deduction of the above-mentioned equation (1) are described in detail hereafter.
The equation (1) is deducted from the Rgap spacing loss equation which is based on the well-known Wallace spacing loss relationship. As illustrated in
From the foregoing equation, it can be seen that if the minfly point is the reader, the DFH gamma ratio is equal to 1, and Rgap spacing loss is equal to step delta. Step delta is a constant value and does not depend on the initial fly-height of the slider, so the Rgap spacing loss is a constant and does not depend on the initial fly-height. This is ideal. Also referring to
At fixed backoff amount,
Rgap spacing loss=[touch down spacing−backoff amount]*[1/DFH gamma ratio−1]+step delta
wherein the step delta is a constant value.
At a first initial fly-height,
Rgap spacing loss (1)=[touch down spacing (1)−backoff amount]*[1/DFH gamma ratio−1]+step delta (3a)
At a second initial fly-height which is different from the first initial fly-height,
Rgap spacing loss (2)=[touch down spacing (2)−backoff amount]*[1/DFH gamma ratio−1]+step delta (3b)
Thus,
Delta (Rgap spacing loss)=[Delta (touch down spacing)]*[1/DFH Gamma ratio−1] (4)
wherein Delta [Rgap spacing loss]=Rgap spacing loss(2)−Rgap spacing loss (1), and Delta [touch down spacing]=touch down spacing (2)−touch down spacing (1).
On the other hand, the change of the Rgap spacing loss is related to the change of the reference values. The relation is:
K*Delta[Rgap spacing loss]=Delta[reference value] (5)
wherein K denotes an experimental coefficient depends on the fixed backoff amount of the slider and the kind of the reference value.
From spacing sensitivity experiment on resolution, we can get the relationship of the resolution value and the Rgap spacing loss. If the backoff amount of the slider is 1 nm, the coefficient K=2, based on experiment data, as shown in
Delta[resolution value]=2*Delta[touch down spacing]*[1/DFH gamma ratio−1]
In comparison with the prior art, the present method tests the DFH gamma ratio of the slider when it is flying over a rotating disk, and uses the change of resolution instead of absolute resolution value, and as the reader shield gap and initial PTR recess level are giving a constant offset of resolution but not contribute to the change of resolution with varying initial fly-height, so the tested DFH gamma ratio according to the present invention is accurate without other factors. Thus, the present method can clearly identify and differentiate out DFH gamma ratio effect in flying media case and, in turn, greatly benefit on slider design in optimizing both head-disk interference (HDI) and performance.
The reference value also can be pulse-width value or other suitable value.
The foregoing description of the present invention has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed, and obviously many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. Such modifications and variations that may be apparent to those skilled in the art are intended to be included within the scope of this invention as defined by the accompanying claims.
Tse, Man, Leung, CheukWing, Tsang, WaSze
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8730612, | Dec 16 2011 | Western Digital Technologies, Inc.; Western Digital Technologies, INC | Disk drive evaluating ratio of fly height setting for first and second heads to verify operability |
8867172, | Jul 31 2012 | SAE Magnetics (HK) Ltd.; Headway Technologies, Inc. | ABS design for uniform touch-down and back-off in DFH applications |
9053749, | Mar 15 2013 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | Disk drive comprising a per-drive and per-head fly height filter |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5673156, | Jun 21 1993 | Komag, Inc. | Hard disk drive system having virtual contact recording |
5991113, | Apr 07 1997 | Seagate Technology LLC | Slider with temperature responsive transducer positioning |
7119979, | Jun 30 2004 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | Measurement of slider clearance by inducing collision of the slider with disk surface |
7180692, | Dec 27 2005 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | System and method for calibrating and controlling a fly-height actuator in a magnetic recording disk drive |
7215495, | Dec 27 2005 | Western Digital Technologies, INC | System and method for determining head-disk contact in a magnetic recording disk drive |
7292401, | Mar 14 2006 | HGST NETHERLANDS B V | System and method for determining head-disk contact in a magnetic recording disk drive by magnetoresistive signal amplitude |
20050174665, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 21 2008 | SAE Magnetics (H.K.) Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 26 2008 | TSE, MAN | SAE MAGNETICS H K LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021542 | /0708 | |
May 26 2008 | LEUNG, CHEUK WING | SAE MAGNETICS H K LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021542 | /0708 | |
May 26 2008 | TSANG, WA SZE | SAE MAGNETICS H K LTD | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021542 | /0708 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 24 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 13 2018 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 21 2022 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
May 08 2023 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 05 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 05 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 05 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 05 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 05 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 05 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 05 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 05 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 05 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 05 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 05 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 05 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |