A power converter includes a transformer, a primary switch, an auxiliary switch, first and second resonance capacitors, and a secondary side rectification means. A switch mode power supply is formed to use reflected voltage and parasitic capacitance as an energy source for a transformer resonance. The auxiliary switch effectively exchanges energy between the primary inductance of the transformer and the first and second resonant capacitors. The auxiliary switch effectively switches the transformer resonance between two distinct frequencies. In one embodiment of the invention, the power converter can be, but is not limited to, a flyback converter and further includes a comparator and a driver. The comparator is for detecting the voltage across the second resonance capacitor and the driver is configured to drive the auxiliary switch based on the output state of the comparator. The resonant nature of the converter provides zero voltage (ZVS) for the primary switch as well as for the auxiliary switch.

Patent
   7924577
Priority
Feb 14 2006
Filed
Nov 17 2009
Issued
Apr 12 2011
Expiry
Feb 14 2027
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
6
81
all paid
1. A quasi resonant type circuit comprising:
a. an inductor;
b. a capacitor coupled to the inductor in a parallel inductor-capacitor (LC) type arrangement;
c. a transistor coupled to the inductor-capacitor type arrangement, the transistor for providing a switching cycle, wherein the switching cycle is determined with respect to a charge on the capacitor;
d. a quasi resonant storage tank for storing an electromagnetic energy by using a resonant current; wherein the circuit is configured to receive the resonant current in a first cycle of operation, wherein the circuit is configured to release the stored energy in a second cycle of operation.
2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the circuit has an associated signal curve that is sinusoidal.
3. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the circuit is configured for operation by using the first and second cycles without the need for an external driver.
4. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the circuit is configured for operation by using the first and second cycles without the need for external control.
5. The circuit of claim 1, further comprising:
a set of parasitic components; and
a set of non parasitic components,
wherein the parasitic and the non parasitic components store the energy,
wherein the energy is retrieved from the parasitic components.
6. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the transistor comprises a MOSFET.
7. The circuit of claim 1, wherein an input power across the primary turns of the transformer provides power to the circuit.
8. The circuit of claim 1, the circuit consisting of no more than two terminal nodes within the circuit, wherein the two terminal nodes are coupled to no more than two pins.
9. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the circuit is coupled to a transformer for a power converter, wherein the circuit provides the switching cycle for the power converter.
10. The circuit of claim 9, wherein the power converter comprises a flyback type power converter.
11. The circuit of claim 9, wherein the power converter comprises a forward type power converter.
12. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the transistor is coupled in a parallel arrangement to the LC type arrangement.
13. The circuit of claim 1, wherein the first and second cycles of operation correspond to the switching cycle.

This Application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/706,554, filed on Feb. 14, 2007, and entitled “TWO TERMINALS QUASI RESONANT TANK CIRCUIT,” which claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. section 119(e) of the U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/773,765, filed on Feb. 14, 2006, and entitled “TWO TERMINALS QUASI RESONANT TANK CIRCUIT,” which are both hereby incorporated by reference.

The present invention is generally directed to the field of resonant circuits. More specifically, the present invention is directed to two terminals quasi resonant tank circuit.

There are several power converter topologies that have been developed over the years, which are intended to improve the power density and switching efficiency of power converters. An emerging focus of new converter topologies is to provide a means to reduce or eliminate converter switching losses, while increasing the switching frequencies. Lower loss and higher switching frequency means more efficient converters, which can reduce the size and weight of converter components. Additionally, with the introduction of high speed composite semiconductor switches, such as metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET) switches operated by pulse width modulation (PWM), recent forward and flyback topologies are now capable of operation at greatly increased switching frequencies, such as, for example, up to 1.0 MHz.

However, an increase in switching frequency can cause a corresponding increase in switching and component stress related losses, as well as increased electromagnetic interference (EMI), noise, and switching commutation problems, due to the rapid ON/OFF switching of the semiconductor switches at high voltage and/or high current levels. Moreover, modern electronic components are expected to perform multiple functions, in a small space, efficiently, and with few undesirable side effects. For instance, a modern voltage converter that provides for relatively high power density and high switching frequencies, should also include uncluttered circuit topologies, provide for isolation of the output or “load” voltage from the input or “source” voltage, and also provide for variable step-up or step-down voltage transformation.

In an effort to reduce or eliminate the switching losses and reduce EMI noise the use of “resonant” or “soft” switching techniques has been increasingly employed in the art. The application of resonant switching techniques to conventional power converter topologies offers many advantages for high density, and high frequency, to reduce or eliminate switching stress and reduce EMI. However, the complexity required to provide control to the power switches (illustrated below as S1 and S2), and the components associated with complex control, create a limited use in commercial applications.

Conventional Flyback Voltage Converter Topology

FIG. 1 illustrates a flyback type voltage converter 100. The converter 100 includes a transformer 102, a resistor 104, two capacitors 106 and 112, and two diodes 108 and 110. The resistor 104 and the capacitor 106 are coupled in parallel. One node of the parallel resistor 104 and the capacitor 106 is coupled to a first terminal of the primary winding of the transformer 102. An anode of the diode 108 is coupled to the primary turns of the transformer 102, and the cathode of the diode 108 is coupled to the other node of the parallel resistor 104 and capacitor 106. An input voltage VIN is coupled to a first terminal of the resistor 104 and to a ground terminal. An anode of the diode 110 is coupled to a first terminal of a secondary winding of the transformer 102. A cathode of the diode 110 is coupled to a first terminal of the capacitor 112. A second terminal of the capacitor 112 is coupled to the second terminal of the secondary winding of the transformer 102. A first terminal of a switching component 115 is coupled to a second terminal of the primary winding of the transformer 102 to provide ON and OFF input power cycles to the transformer 102. A second terminal of the switching component 115 is coupled to a sense resistor 117, which in turn is coupled to ground. A load 114 is typically coupled to the output of the converter 100, at the secondary turns of the transformer 102.

The Flyback topology has long been attractive because of its relative simplicity when compared with other topologies used in low power application. The flyback “transformer” serves the dual purpose of providing energy storage as well as converter isolation, theoretically minimizing the magnetic component count when compared with, for example, forward converter. A drawback to use of the flyback is the relatively high voltage and current stress suffered by the switching components. Additionally, high turn-off voltage (caused by the parasitic oscillation between transformer leakage inductance and switch capacitance) seen by the primary switch traditionally requires the use of a RCD 108,106,104. This parasitic oscillation is extremely rich in harmonics and pollutes the environment with EMI, and causes high switching losses from the switching components in the form of extra thermal dissipation. These switching losses are further described below in relation to FIG. 2.

Conventional Flyback Timing Diagram

Accordingly, the converter 100 is configured to receive the input voltage V across the primary turns of the transformer 102, and provide power through the secondary turns of the transformer 102, to a load represented by the resistor 114. Also shown in FIG. 1, current at the primary side of the transformer 102 is proportional to the current flowing through the sense resistor and is represented by IPRI, while current at the secondary side is shown by ISEC.

The flyback voltage converter 100 suffers from loss, noise, and other inefficient and/or undesirable effects during operation. For instance, FIG. 2 illustrates a diagram 200 of the voltage and current signal curves recorded during the operation of the flyback converter 100 of FIG. 1. A shown in FIG. 2, the diagram 200 includes signals for the input voltage VIN, and a drain to source voltage VDS, across the switch 115 and current IPRI through the switching component 115, at times t1 through t5. Also shown in this figure, the illustrated signal curves include noise effects and a saw tooth shape that result from the hard switching of the flyback converter 100. The harsh electronic noise effects from ringing are particularly dramatic about the hard switch times of the switching cycle. Further, as mentioned above, these undesirable effects become even more pronounced at the higher switching frequencies required by modern voltage converter applications.

In an effort to reduce or eliminate the switching losses and reduce EMI noise caused by high switching frequencies, “resonant” or “soft” switching techniques are increasingly being employed. Resonant switching techniques generally include an inductor-capacitor (LC) subcircuit in series with a semiconductor switch which, when turned ON, creates a resonating subcircuit within the converter. Further, timing the ON/OFF control cycles of the resonant switch to correspond with particular voltage and current conditions across respective converter components during the switching cycle allows for switching under zero voltage and/or zero current conditions. Zero voltage switching (ZVS) and/or zero current switching (ZCS) inherently reduces or eliminates many frequency related switching losses.

Several power converter topologies have been developed utilizing resonant switching techniques, such as, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,694,304 entitled “High Efficiency Resonant Switching Converters,” to Telefus, et al., (Telefus), which is hereby incorporated by reference; U.S. Pat. No. 5,057,986 entitled “Zero Voltage Resonant Transition Switching Power Converter,” to Henze, et al., (Henze), which is hereby incorporated by reference; U.S. Pat. No. 5,126,931 entitled “Fixed Frequency Single Ended Forward Converter Switching at Zero Voltage,” to Jitaru (Jitaru), which is hereby incorporated by reference; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,177,675 entitled “Zero Voltage, Zero Current, Resonant Converter,” to Archer, (Archer), which is hereby incorporated by reference.

In particular, Henze describes single ended DC-DC flyback topologies for operation at very high switching frequencies, such as 1.0 MHz or greater. In Henze, a plurality of pulse width modulated (PWM) switches are utilized to effect zero voltage resonant transition switching. Jitaru describes variations of known forward and/or flyback converter topologies employing zero voltage and/or zero current resonant techniques. Jitaru specifically describes a forward converter topology utilizing resonant switching techniques to operate at constant frequency. Archer describes zero voltage, and zero current, switching techniques in resonant flyback topologies utilizing a resonant transformer assembly inserted in parallel with either the primary or secondary winding of the main transformer.

The application of such resonant switching techniques to conventional power converter topologies offers many advantages for high density, high frequency converters, such as quasi sinusoidal current waveforms, reduced or eliminated switching stresses on the electrical components of the converter, reduced frequency dependent losses, and/or reduced EMI. However, energy losses incurred during control of zero voltage switching and/or zero current switching, and losses incurred during driving, and controlling the resonance means, are still problematic. For instance, some researchers have implemented an active clamp in conjunction with a resonant converter circuit to realize the benefits of high frequency switching, while reducing its many side effects. See, for example, the United States Patent to Telefus, incorporated by reference above.

A power converter includes a transformer, a primary switch, an auxiliary switch, first and second resonance capacitors and secondary side rectification means. When the auxiliary switch is on, a first resonance frequency is formed by the energy exchange between the primary inductance of said transformer and said first resonance capacitor. When the auxiliary switch is off, a second resonance frequency is formed by the exchange of energy between said transformer and said first and second resonance capacitors.

In one embodiment of the invention, the power converter can be, but is not limited to, a flyback converter and further includes a comparator to detect the voltage across the second resonance capacitor and driver means to drive the auxiliary switch based on the output state of said comparator.

It is an object of the invention to provide substantially Zero Voltage Switching (ZVS) for the primary switch. It is a further object of the invention to provide substantially Zero Voltage Switching for the auxiliary switch. It is another object of the invention to include the energy stored in most parasitic capacitances in the primary switch, the secondary switch and the transformer in the resonance cycle. It is yet another object of the invention to provide driver means for the auxiliary switch that is independent from the driving means for the primary switch. It is yet another object of the invention to extract the energy for said driver means for the auxiliary switch from the main resonance cycle, making the auxiliary switch substantially self driven.

The novel features of the invention are set forth in the appended claims. However, for purpose of explanation, several embodiments of the invention are set forth in the following figures.

FIG. 1 illustrates a conventional flyback topology.

FIG. 2 illustrates a timing diagram for the flyback topology of FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 illustrates a two terminal resonant tank circuit of the present invention.

FIG. 4 illustrates an alternate embodiment of a two terminal resonant tank circuit with parasitic capacitances.

FIG. 5 illustrates the circuit of FIG. 4 with parasitic capacitances and resonances.

FIGS. 6A, 6B, 6C, 6D and 6E illustrate timing diagrams for the operation of the circuits illustrated in FIGS. 3, 4 and 5.

FIG. 7 is a signal diagram having a quasi or sinusoidal shape.

In the following description, numerous details and alternatives are set forth for purpose of explanation. However, one of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the invention can be practiced without the use of these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to not obscure the description of the invention with unnecessary detail.

A detailed description of the principles of operation will be given based on the preferred embodiment of the invention in a power converter of the Quasi Resonant Flyback type. The invention can also be used on other converter types such as, but not limited to, a forward converter.

The circuit of FIG. 3 illustrates a conceptual representation of the invention in a Quasi Resonant Flyback converter. The power converter in FIG. 3 comprises of a transformer (303) with primary and secondary windings, a primary switch (305), an auxiliary switch (304), a first resonance capacitor (306), a second resonance capacitor (302) and a comparator (309) with driving means for the auxiliary switch (304). The converter further includes secondary rectifier means comprising of a diode (307) and a capacitor (308).

The circuit in FIG. 3 further includes a DC power source (301) to provide power to the primary side of the power converter. The comparator (309) and driver means for auxiliary switch (304) are configured such that when the voltage across the primary winding of the transformer (303) is higher than zero, the auxiliary switch will be in the on position. The comparator (309) and driver means for auxiliary switch (304) are further configured such that when the voltage across the primary winding of the transformer (303) is equal or lower than zero, the auxiliary switch will be in the off position. Consequently a first resonance frequency exists for voltages of less than or equal to zero across the primary winding of transformer (303) as a result of the energy exchange between the primary inductance of transformer (303) and the first resonance capacitor (306).

For voltages of higher than zero across the primary winding of the transformer (303), the auxiliary switch (304) will be in the on position and the second resonance capacitor (302) is connected in parallel with the first resonance capacitor (306). Consequently, a second resonance frequency, which is lower in value than said first resonance frequency, exists for voltages of higher than zero across the primary winding of transformer (303) as a result of the energy exchange between the primary inductance of transformer (303) and the first and second resonance capacitors (306 and 302).

FIG. 6A represents the drive signal Vgs1 for the primary switch (305), and the voltage Vds1 across the primary switch (305). The following description of a single switching cycle of the power converter from FIG. 3 is based on a steady state continuous waveform under minimum load at the output of the power converter. The invention also provides similar benefits when operating under other circumstances, such as, but not limited to, operation under a load at the output of the power converter and during start-up of the power converter.

When the power converter from FIG. 3 operates under minimum load conditions, the duty cycle of the drive signal (Vgs1) needs to be very small. One switching cycle of the power converter is now discussed from the moment that the primary switch (305) is switched off until the moment that said primary switch is switched on again. At switch off of the primary switch (305) the voltage across the first resonance capacitor (306) is substantially equal to the voltage of the power source (301). As a result of the resonance between the inductance of the primary winding of the transformer (303) and the first resonance capacitor (306), the voltage across the primary switch will increase and consequently the voltage across the first resonance capacitor (306) and the primary winding of transformer (303) will reduce.

After a quarter cycle of the first resonance frequency, the voltage across the primary switch (305) will be substantially equal to the voltage of power source (301) and consequently the voltage across the first resonance capacitor (306) and the primary winding of the transformer (303) is substantially zero. At this moment most of the energy originally stored in the first resonance capacitor (303) is now stored in the inductance of the transformer (303). Also at this moment the auxiliary switch (304) is switched on by comparator (309) and the driving means for the auxiliary switch. As a result of the second resonance between the inductance of the primary winding of the transformer (303) and the first and second resonance capacitors (306 and 304) in parallel, the voltage across the primary switch will further increase and consequently the voltage across the first resonance capacitor (306) and the primary winding of transformer (303) will also increase.

After a quarter cycle of the second resonance frequency, most of the energy stored in the inductance of the transformer will be transferred to the first and second resonance capacitors but in opposite polarity and lower amplitude (Vreset) compared to the original start voltage (Vsource) across the first resonance capacitor (306). As a result of the resonance between the first and second resonance capacitors and the primary inductance of the transformer, the voltage across the primary winding and consequently the voltage across primary switch (305) will start to decline.

After a quarter cycle of the second resonant frequency, most of the energy stored in the first and second resonance capacitors will again be stored in the inductance of the transformer. At that moment the voltage across the first and second resonance capacitors and the primary winding of the transformer is substantially zero. At that moment the auxiliary switch will be switched to the off position again by the comparator and the driver means for the auxiliary switch. After the auxiliary switch is switched to the off position, the resonance will continue based on the original first resonance between the inductance of the primary winding of the transformer and the first resonance capacitor.

After a quarter cycle of the first resonance frequency, the voltage across the primary switch (305) will further reduce until it reaches substantially zero. At that moment the primary switch can switch on under substantially Zero Voltage Switching conditions. The auxiliary switch (302) also switches under substantially Zero Voltage Switching conditions as a result of the comparator (309) which detects the zero voltage point across the primary winding of the transformer (303), which coincides with a substantially zero voltage across the auxiliary switch.

FIG. 6B represents the drive signal (Vgs1) for the primary switch 305, and the voltage (Vds1) across the primary switch 305 in a situation that there is a significant load connected to the secondary side of the power converter of FIG. 3. In this situation, the primary switch (305) is switched on for a longer period in order to charge a larger amount of energy into the inductance of the transformer (303). After the primary switch 305 is switched to the off position, the rise of the voltage (Vds1) across the primary switch 305 progresses in a similar way as described above for the zero load condition.

Once the voltage across the primary switch 305 reaches the level of Vreset, the additional energy in the transformer 303 caused by the longer charge period during the on state of the primary switch 305, discharges through the secondary side of the transformer (303) via the secondary rectifier diode (307) into the secondary smoothing capacitor (308) and eventually into the load (310).

FIG. 6C represents the current (Id) through the secondary rectifier 307 relative to the voltage (Vds1) across the primary switch 305.

FIG. 4 represents a more practical realization 400 of the preferred embodiment of the current invention. The auxiliary switch is represented by a MOSFET (420) with its parasitic capacitances Ciss1 (442), Coss1 (428) and Crss1 (440), and its inherent body diode (422). The auxiliary switch is represented by a MOSFET (424) with its parasitic capacitances Ciss2 (446), Coss2 (448) and Crss2 (444), and its inherent body diode (426). The circuit 400 further includes a transformer (402), driving circuitry for the auxiliary MOSFET comprising of three diodes (430, 432, 434) and a capacitor (436), and secondary rectification means comprising of a rectifier diode (410) and a smoothing capacitor (412).

In slightly simplified form, the first resonance capacitor (302) as it appears in FIG. 3 is represented, in FIG. 4, by the addition of Coss1 (428) and Crss1 (440) in series with Cres (438) plus the addition of Coss2 (448) and Crss2 (444). The second resonance capacitor (306), of FIG. 3, is represented in FIG. 4 by the capacitor Cres (438). As a result of the diodes in the circuit and the switching of the auxiliary MOSFET the effective resonance capacitance, and consequently the resonance frequency, will be slightly different for the four quadrants of the switching cycle in comparison to the resonance frequencies in the simplified circuit of FIG. 3 as can be calculated by one with ordinary skill in the art.

In most single ended power converters such as the flyback converters of FIGS. 3 and 4, it is desirable to keep the reset voltage limited so that the voltage level across the switching MOSFET (Vds1) remains within the safe operating area. In this situation the reset voltage (Vres) across the primary winding of the transformer (402) is lower than (Vde) the voltage across the primary winding of the transformer during the on-time of the primary MOSFET (424). To achieve Zero Voltage Switching for the primary MOSFET the energy (Ehigh) in the effective resonance capacitance at the point of maximum reset voltage (Vres) has to be equal or larger than the energy (Elow) in the effective resonance capacitance just prior to the switch on of the primary MOSFET.

The following equations express the values of Elow and Ehigh as a function of voltages and capacitances:
Elow=(Vsource2(Coss1+Coss2+Crss1+Crss2))/2  EQ1
Ehigh=(Vres2(Cres+Coss1+Crss1+[CissCdv]/[Ciss1+Cdv]))/2  EQ2
To meet ZVS for the primary MOSFET the following equation has to be met:
Ehigh=Elow  EQ3
The value for Cres can be determined from equations EQ1, EQ2 and EQ3.

The preferred embodiment of the invention as represented in FIG. 4 further includes a method for driving the gate of the auxiliary MOSFET from the voltage across Cres (438). At the moment that the rising edge of the voltage across the primary winding of the transformer reaches zero, the body diode 422 of the auxiliary MOSFET (420) starts conducting, which effectively switches on the auxiliary switch (304) as it appears in the simplified circuit of FIG. 3. Also diode (432) starts conducting at this point and starts charging Ciss1 (442) through Cdv (436). The further rising voltage across Cres (438) is divided by the gate drive capacitor Cdv (436) and the addition of parasitic capacitances Ciss1 (442) and Crss1 (440).

When the voltage across Ciss1 reaches the threshold voltage of auxiliary MOSFET (420), said MOSFET will turn on. It is important that the ratio between Vres and the maximum voltage on the gate of MOSFET (420) is chosen to stay within the safe operating area of said MOSFET. Said ratio can be dimensioned with the value of the driver capacitor Cdv (436). The gate voltage of MOSFET (420) will remain substantially the same until the voltage across Cres has reduced to the same level of said gate voltage. When the voltage across Cres further reduces, diode (434) starts conducting and will pull the gate voltage of MOSFET (420) down until it reaches the gate threshold voltage at which point the auxiliary MOSFET (420) switches off. Diodes (430, 432 and 434) further prohibit the voltage across Cres (438) to go significantly below zero.

FIGS. 6C and 6D represent the gate voltage of the auxiliary MOSFET (420) relative to the voltage (Vds1) across the primary MOSFET (424), respectively at zero load (FIG. 6D) and under normal load (FIG. 6E).

In a practical circuit using an embodiment of the invention such as, but not limited to, the circuit of FIG. 4, the transformer 402 may include other parasitic components such as, but not limited to, a leakage inductance. An additional resonance between the first and second resonance capacitors and other parasitic components of the transformer may cause additional voltage fluctuations that are superimposed on the waveforms as represented in FIGS. 6A through 6E. These additional voltage fluctuations may distort the waveforms but do not inhibit the principle operation of the current invention.

As mentioned above, the circuit 300 of FIG. 3 further includes certain parasitic capacitances that store and release energy. FIG. 4 illustrates an alternative implementation for the resonant flyback topology of FIG. 3, with representative parasitic capacitances, while FIG. 5 shows the circuit 400 of FIG. 4, with additional resonances. As shown in FIG. 5, the circuit 500 includes nonparasitic (real) and parasitic capacitances C 503, CDV 536, CRES 538, Crss1 540, Ciss1 542, Crss2 544, Ciss2 546, Coss1 528 and Coss2 548, and switches S1 and S3. The switch S1 of some embodiments serves as a primary switch and is formed by using a MOSFET 524, a diode 526, and a capacitance Coss2 548, all coupled in parallel. Accordingly, the gate lead of the MOSFET 524 is typically coupled to a controller and/or a driver for the circuit 500. The circuit 500 also includes a diode 510, a capacitor 512, and a load 514 coupled to the secondary turns of a transformer 502, which typically includes a rectifier type circuit.

FIG. 5 further illustrates that the primary turns of the transformer 502 have inductances L 501, LRES 516 and LMAG 518. Hence, the transformer 502 is coupled in parallel to the capacitor Crss2 544, and selectively coupled in parallel to the capacitor Crss1 540 through the switch S2, in an inductor-capacitor (LC) circuit type arrangement. For instance, the capacitor Crss1 540 is selectively coupled and de-coupled from the inductor-capacitor arrangement by using the switch S2 to advantageously vary the properties of the circuit, such as to produce multiple frequencies, for example. As shown in the exemplary embodiment 500 of FIG. 5, the switch S2 serves as an auxiliary switch and comprises a MOSFET 520, a diode 522, and a capacitance Coss1 528, all coupled in parallel. The switching frequencies are further described below and in relation to FIG. 7.

Zero Voltage Switching

The circuits 300, 400 and 500, of FIGS. 3, 4 and 5, advantageously operate by using two distinct frequencies and zero voltage switching. These two frequencies are further described in relation to FIG. 3. The first frequency f1 is generated when the switch 304 is activated. When the switch 304 is activated or ON, the capacitor 302 is coupled in parallel to the inductor-capacitor circuit that includes the capacitor 306 and the primary turns of the transformer 303. Hence, the first frequency f1 is given by:

f1=1/[2π√{square root over (L·Σ(C302+C306))}], where L is the inductance of the primary turns, C302 is the capacitance of the capacitor 302, and C306 is the capacitance of the capacitor 306, illustrated in FIG. 3; and
f2=1/[2π√{square root over (L·C306)}].

FIG. 7 conceptually illustrates these two distinct frequencies f1 and f2, in relation to the zero voltage switching of some embodiments in further detail. More specifically, FIG. 7 is a signal diagram 700 having a quasi or sinusoidal shape. As shown in this figure, the first frequency f1 is given by the portion of the signal curve above the X-axis, while the second frequency f2 is given by the portion of the signal curve below the X-axis. Also illustrated in this figure, the switching from the first frequency f1 to the second frequency f2 is advantageously by zero voltage switching, while the switching from the second frequency f2 to the first frequency f1 is also by a zero voltage switch. As mentioned above, such switching is more efficient and produces fewer undesirable effects such as, for example, EMI, noise, and harmonics.

In the power conversion industry, one of the most traditional conventional power supply technologies is flyback voltage conversion. Flyback technology converts DC high voltage or DC low voltage by storing and releasing energy. Typically, flyback type conversion is not preferred for high power applications but is considered good for low to medium power conversion, of up to about 100 Watts, for example. Hence, flyback technology is still considered a beneficial topology for particular applications in the power conversion industry in terms of its small implementation size, electrical energy efficiency, and friendliness to the electrical environment (in terms of noise and/or EMI effects). However, in modern high frequency and/or high power applications, conventional technology such as flyback conversion, experiences several undesirable effects as the product of natural phenomena.

For instance, Land's law and Maxwell's law states that a frequency generated magnetic field depends on the operating frequency, such as, for example, the switching frequency in voltage conversion applications. Accordingly, as frequency increases, elements introduced by magnetic fields become smaller. Researchers have exploited this property in a solution for the problem of magnetic effects during voltage conversion. More specifically, by increasing switching frequency, the magnetic fields and properties naturally generated by the fast switching electrical components, become smaller. However, high frequency operation has tradeoffs. For instance, in addition to increased switching losses and noise levels, higher frequency operation by using a large amount of fast, hard switching, further undesirably creates waveforms with increasing harmonics. Hence, the high frequency solutions in the art reduce only one undesirable element. Here, only undesirable magnetic effects are typically reduced, while many other undesirable effects are generated instead.

These further undesirable tradeoff effects require a panoply of patchwork fixes including heat sinks, and larger sized power supplies, that are less efficient and more costly. Thus, the tradeoff of high frequency for lower magnetics creates a net loss in the system. However, due to the laws of physics, reducing undesirable magnetic effects, mandates the use of higher operating frequencies, and its set of undesirable drawbacks.

More specifically, in a power supply, the most complicated components are typically the transformer(s) and the transistor(s). Increasing the switching frequency, reduces the cross sectional area of magnetic field geometry of these electrical components, which reduces the undesirable magnetic effects of the switching. However, the higher operating frequency traditionally causes saw tooth type waveforms. These hard switching waveforms are also indicative of high amounts of noise and losses due to inefficient switching. Further, these noisy, sawtooth type of waveforms are rich with harmonics, which result in further undesirable effects and inefficiency.

In view of the foregoing, some embodiments employ high frequency operation advantageously, by introducing resonant high frequencies, which reduces the effects of hard switching and makes switching “softer.” These embodiments, rather than apply patchwork fixes, change the fundamental voltage converter circuit, by applying a resonance (frequency). The embodiments described above illustrate the operation of such a resonant type circuit, which make the switched transistor and diode components of such circuits operate in a ‘soft mode,’ which more closely resembles a sine wave. Moreover, these embodiments have no, or minimal, switching losses, because the voltage and/or current approach a zero value before the periodic, sinusoidal switch to the rising or falling portion of the sine wave.

In some embodiments, a capacitor and an inductor form the resonance circuit, while some embodiments couple a capacitor (a real component) in parallel with the coil of a transformer (an inherent inductor) to form a parallel resonance circuit. In both these types of implementations, the parasitic capacitances advantageously generate a negative current back to the source. Hence, the parasitic capacitances, which are normally problematic for a system, operate as a large capacitor that stores and releases energy in conjunction with the resonant tank and the real capacitances. Stated differently, all the components are in a full resonance circuit, including the real or active components, and the parasitic components. Therefore, all or most of the energy generated by the components of the system, including the parasitic components, is transferred either to the load (typically in the low frequency mode), or back to the source (in the high frequency mode).

In particular, the cyclical operation of some embodiments implement a quasi resonant storage tank by the generation of a series of dampening sinusoidal wave forms. Some embodiments further maintain, for the system, an energy equilibrium such that the energy of a high frequency cycle is substantially equivalent to the energy of a low frequency cycle.

Also, as mentioned above, some embodiments of the invention have only two terminal nodes. These two terminal implementations have benefits in terms of both manufacturing and commercial aspects. For instance, the resonant tank circuit of some embodiments has active components that couple across the transformer by using only two terminal nodes, provide an elegant design for manufacture. Moreover, the two terminal node design results in only two pins, which has certain commercial and/or packaging advantages.

While the invention has been described with reference to numerous specific details, one of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that the invention can be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit of the invention. For instance, in a particular embodiment the drain voltage VD on the primary switch 305 illustrated in FIG. 3 can be on the order of 100 volts, while the gate voltage VG is about 20 volts, the current IPRI is about 200 milli-amperes, and ISEC is about 2.0 amperes, while the inductor of some embodiments may be rated at about 600 micro-Henry. However, one of ordinary skill recognizes that these particular signals and values vary for each specific power implementation. Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art will understand that the invention is not to be limited by the foregoing illustrative details, but rather is to be defined by the appended claims.

Sharifipour, Bahman, Jansen, Arian, Telefus, Mark

Patent Priority Assignee Title
8743565, Jul 27 2012 Flextronics AP, LLC High power converter architecture
9312775, Aug 15 2012 Flextronics AP, LLC Reconstruction pulse shape integrity in feedback control environment
9660540, Nov 05 2012 Flextronics AP, LLC Digital error signal comparator
9711990, Mar 15 2013 Flextronics AP, LLC No load detection and slew rate compensation
9806553, Mar 15 2013 Flextronics AP, LLC Depletion MOSFET driver
9954439, Oct 23 2016 Sanken Electric Co., Ltd. Control circuit of switching power-supply device and switching power-supply device
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4051425, Feb 03 1975 Telephone Utilities and Communications Industries, Inc. AC to DC power supply circuit
4273406, Dec 28 1978 Mitsuoka Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd. Electrical cord adapter
4695933, Feb 11 1985 Sundstrand Corporation Multiphase DC-DC series-resonant converter
4712160, Jul 02 1985 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Power supply module
4788626, Feb 15 1986 Brown, Boveri & Cie AG Power semiconductor module
4841220, Sep 23 1987 Center for Innovative Technology Dc-to-Dc converters using multi-resonant switches
4857822, Sep 23 1987 VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY, BLACKSBURG, VA Zero-voltage-switched multi-resonant converters including the buck and forward type
4866367, Apr 11 1988 Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Multi-loop control for quasi-resonant converters
4890217, Jun 10 1987 Norand Corporation Universal power supply, independent converter stages for respective hardware components of a computerized system
4893227, Jul 08 1988 Eldec Corporation Push pull resonant flyback switchmode power supply converter
4899256, Jun 01 1988 Chrysler Motors Corporation Power module
4901069, Jul 16 1987 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Apparatus for electromagnetically coupling power and data signals between a first unit and a second unit and in particular between well bore apparatus and the surface
5101322, Mar 07 1990 TEMIC AUTOMOTIVE OF NORTH AMERICA, INC Arrangement for electronic circuit module
5132890, Jan 09 1991 Koss Corporation Power supply based on normally parasitic resistance of solid state switch
5164657, Aug 08 1988 Synchronous switching power supply comprising buck converter
5235491, May 10 1990 Vero Electronics GmbH Safety power supply
5262932, Mar 04 1991 COOPERHEAT INTERNATIONAL LIMITED Power converter
5295044, Sep 26 1991 Kabushiki Kaisah Toshiba Semiconductor device
5438294, Mar 19 1992 Astec International, Ltd. Gate drive circuit
5490052, Apr 24 1992 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD Switching power supply
5565761, Sep 02 1994 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Synchronous switching cascade connected offline PFC-PWM combination power converter controller
5565781, Jul 09 1991 SEB S A Device for detecting the malfunctioning of a load such as a magnetron
5592128, Mar 30 1995 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Oscillator for generating a varying amplitude feed forward PFC modulation ramp
5673185, Apr 07 1995 U S PHILIPS CORPORATION Circuit arrangement for generating a DC-separated output voltage
5712772, Feb 03 1995 Ericsson Raynet Controller for high efficiency resonant switching converters
5742151, Jun 20 1996 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Input current shaping technique and low pin count for pfc-pwm boost converter
5747977, Mar 30 1995 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Switching regulator having low power mode responsive to load power consumption
5786687, Dec 03 1996 HTC Corporation Transformer-isolated pulse drive circuit
5798635, Jun 20 1996 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation One pin error amplifier and switched soft-start for an eight pin PFC-PWM combination integrated circuit converter controller
5804950, Jun 20 1996 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Input current modulation for power factor correction
5811895, Aug 12 1994 LENOVO SINGAPORE PTE LTD Power supply circuit for use with a battery and an AC power adaptor
5818207, Dec 11 1996 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Three-pin buck converter and four-pin power amplifier having closed loop output voltage control
5870294, Sep 26 1997 Astec International Limited Soft switched PWM AC to DC converter with gate array logic control
5894243, Dec 11 1996 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Three-pin buck and four-pin boost converter having open loop output voltage control
5903138, Mar 30 1995 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Two-stage switching regulator having low power modes responsive to load power consumption
5905369, Oct 17 1996 MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD Variable frequency switching of synchronized interleaved switching converters
5923543, Dec 14 1996 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD Resonance-type power switching device
6058026, Jul 26 1999 ABB POWER ELECTRONICS INC Multiple output converter having a single transformer winding and independent output regulation
6069803, Feb 12 1999 Astec International Limited Offset resonance zero volt switching flyback converter
6091233, Jan 14 1999 Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation Interleaved zero current switching in a power factor correction boost converter
6091611, Apr 26 1994 COMARCO WIRELESS SYSTEMS LLC Connectors adapted for controlling a small form factor power supply
6160725, Mar 12 1999 MINEBEA CO , LTD System and method using phase detection to equalize power from multiple power sources
6272015, Nov 24 1997 Infineon Technologies Americas Corp Power semiconductor module with insulation shell support for plural separate substrates
6282092, Jun 12 1998 Shindengen Electric Manufacturing Co., Ltd.; Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Electronic circuit device and method of fabricating the same
6323627, Feb 28 1998 Robert Bosch GmbH D.C.-d.c. converter with a transformer and a reactance coil
6326740, Dec 22 1998 Philips Electronics North America Corporation High frequency electronic ballast for multiple lamp independent operation
6344980, Jan 14 1999 Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC Universal pulse width modulating power converter
6366483, Jul 24 2000 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. PWM rectifier having de-coupled power factor and output current control loops
6396277, Oct 01 1999 SNAP-ON TECHNOLOGIES, INC Coil on plug signal detection
6407514, Mar 29 2001 General Electric Company Non-synchronous control of self-oscillating resonant converters
6469914, Jan 14 1999 Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC Universal pulse width modulating power converter
6469980, Apr 15 1996 Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Optical disk and a recording/reproduction apparatus using multiple address block groups shifted oppositely with multiple address blocks and non-pit data
6483281, Feb 11 2000 Champion Microelectronic Corporation Low power mode and feedback arrangement for a switching power converter
6487095, Oct 31 2001 International Business Machines Corporation Multiphase zero-volt-switching resonant DC-DC regulator
6531854, Mar 30 2001 Champion Microelectronic Corp. Power factor correction circuit arrangement
6541944, Feb 11 2000 Champion Microelectronic Corp. Low power mode and feedback arrangement for a switching power converter
6578253, Oct 04 1991 FMTT, INC Transformer and inductor modules having directly bonded terminals and heat-sink fins
6583999, Jan 25 2002 Appletec Ltd. Low output voltage, high current, half-bridge, series-resonant, multiphase, DC-DC power supply
6605930, Feb 11 2000 Champion Microelectronic Corp. Low power mode and feedback arrangement for a switching power converter
6657417, May 31 2002 CHAMPION MICROELECRONIC CORP ; CHAMPION MICROELECTRONIC CORP Power factor correction with carrier control and input voltage sensing
6671189, Nov 09 2001 MINEBEA ELECTRONICS CO , LTD Power converter having primary and secondary side switches
6674272, Jun 21 2001 CHAMPION MICROELECTRONIC CORP Current limiting technique for a switching power converter
6958920, Oct 02 2003 Microchip Technology Incorporated Switching power converter and method of controlling output voltage thereof using predictive sensing of magnetic flux
6970366, Apr 03 2003 BEL POWER SOLUTIONS INC Phase-shifted resonant converter having reduced output ripple
7035126, Jun 10 2002 Comarco Wireless Technologies, Inc. Programmable power supply capable of receiving AC and DC power input
7038406, Feb 07 2003 COMSTAR AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED Bi-directional field control for proportional control based generator/alternator voltage regulator
7047059, Aug 18 1998 Quantum Magnetics, Inc Simplified water-bag technique for magnetic susceptibility measurements on the human body and other specimens
7064497, Feb 09 2005 National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Dead-time-modulated synchronous PWM controller for dimmable CCFL royer inverter
7212420, Feb 12 2002 Universal serial bus voltage transformer
7286376, Nov 23 2005 Semiconductor Components Industries, LLC Soft-switching power converter having power saving circuit for light load operations
7324354, Jul 08 2005 BIO-RAD LABORATORIES, INC Power supply with a digital feedback loop
7450388, Jan 16 2002 Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. Power converter connection configuration
7499301, Jul 07 2006 TINYPLUG TECHNOLOGY SHENZHEN LIMITED Plugtype power supply unit
7570497, May 26 2006 POWER INTEGRATIONS, LIMITED Discontinuous quasi-resonant forward converter
7639520, Feb 26 2007 NetApp, Inc Efficient power supply
7764515, Feb 14 2006 MYPAQ HOLDINGS LTD Two terminals quasi resonant tank circuit
20020011823,
20030035303,
20040228153,
20050105224,
20050281425,
//////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Apr 27 2007JANSEN, ARIANFlextronics AP, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235310295 pdf
May 21 2007TELEFUS, MARKFlextronics AP, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235310295 pdf
Jul 23 2007SHARIFIPOUR, BAHMANFlextronics AP, LLCASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0235310295 pdf
Nov 17 2009Flextronics AP, LLC(assignment on the face of the patent)
Mar 19 2021Flextronics AP, LLCMYPAQ HOLDINGS LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0558710399 pdf
Apr 08 2021MYPAQ HOLDINGS LTD NSF I LLCSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0559730892 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Sep 25 2014M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Oct 11 2018M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Sep 28 2022M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 12 20144 years fee payment window open
Oct 12 20146 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 12 2015patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 12 20172 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 12 20188 years fee payment window open
Oct 12 20186 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 12 2019patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 12 20212 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 12 202212 years fee payment window open
Oct 12 20226 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 12 2023patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 12 20252 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)