A finless mortar tube made of a superalloy includes, seriatim, a breech end, a beginning taper point, an ending taper point, a lower clamp region, an upper clamp region, and a muzzle end. The nominal wall thickness of the tube is constant from forward of the breech end to the beginning taper point and the nominal wall thickness of the tube decreases from the beginning taper point to the ending taper point. The mortar tube is capable of a substantial increase in the rate of fire compared to conventional mortar tubes.
|
15. A mortar tube, comprising:
a tube having no cooling fins, made of a superalloy, and having a nominal constant inside diameter of about 81 mm;
the tube comprising, seriatim, a breech end, a beginning taper point, an ending taper point, a lower clamp region, an upper clamp region, and a muzzle end;
a nominal wall thickness of the tube being constant from forward of the breech end to the beginning taper point and the nominal wall thickness of the tube decreasing from the beginning taper point to the ending taper point;
wherein the tube does not undergo plastic deformation when firing 30 rounds per minute for two minutes and 15 rounds per minute continuous thereafter, at a maximum pressure of about 15,800 psi.
1. A mortar tube, comprising:
a tube having no cooling fins, made of a superalloy, and having a nominal constant inside diameter of about 60 mm;
the tube comprising, seriatim, a breech end, a beginning taper point, an ending taper point, a lower clamp region, an upper clamp region, and a muzzle end;
a nominal wall thickness of the tube being constant from forward of the breech end to the beginning taper point and the nominal wall thickness of the tube decreasing from the beginning taper point to the ending taper point;
wherein the tube does not undergo plastic deformation when firing 30 rounds per minute for four minutes and 20 rounds per minute continuous thereafter, at a maximum pressure of about 10,080 psi.
2. The mortar tube of
3. The mortar tube of
4. The mortar tube of
5. The mortar tube of
6. The mortar tube of
7. The mortar tube of
8. The mortar tube of
9. The mortar tube of
10. The mortar tube of
11. The mortar tube of
12. The mortar tube of
13. The mortar tube of
14. The mortar tube of
16. The mortar tube of
17. The mortar tube of
18. The mortar tube of
19. The mortar tube of
20. The mortar tube of
21. The mortar tube of
22. The mortar tube of
23. The mortar tube of
24. The mortar tube of
25. The mortar tube of
26. The mortar tube of
27. The mortar tube of
28. The mortar tube of
29. The mortar tube of
30. The mortar tube of
31. A method of making a mortar tube, comprising:
providing a superalloy material; and
making the mortar tube of
32. A method of making a mortar tube, comprising:
providing a superalloy material; and
making the mortar tube of
33. The method of
|
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/162,745 filed on Sep. 21, 2005, which claims the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. provisional patent applications 60/522,510 filed on Oct. 7, 2004 and 60/522,566 filed on Oct. 14, 2004, which applications are hereby incorporated by reference.
The inventions described herein may be manufactured, used and licensed by or for the U.S. Government for U.S. Government purposes.
The invention relates in general to mortar tubes, and in particular to finless mortar tubes with reduced wall thicknesses.
Mortars tubes presently used by the United States armed forces are generally available in three sizes of nominal inside diameter, namely, 60 mm (millimeter), 81 mm and 120 mm. The current 60 mm and 81 mm mortar tubes have cooling fins that function to reduce the tube temperature during firing. The mortar tube cooling fins are expensive to manufacture and add additional weight to the mortar tube. The 120 mm mortar tube does not have cooling fins because its required rate of fire is less than the 60 mm and 81 mm mortars. Lightweight finless mortar tubes in the 60 mm and 81 mm sizes that are capable of firing high pressure rounds at the high rates of fire characteristic of United States mortars are not known.
Generally speaking, the soldier in the field benefits whenever anything he/she must handle is made to weigh less. In “Hydrostatic Extrusion of 60 mm Mortar Tubes” (Watervliet Arsenal, Watervliet, N.Y., October 1974, available from NTIS, Springfield, Va.), DeFries describes the hydrostatic extrusion of four 60 mm tubes made of Inconel, a “superalloy.” These tubes were relatively thick-walled (approximately 5 mm or greater) and included cooling fins. Although some mechanical tests were performed on the DeFries tubes, it does not appear that the tubes were ever “live-fire” tested. There is a need for a mortar tube that is light in weight (thin-walled), cheap to manufacture (no cooling fins), and capable of rapid, continuous firing without failure.
An object of the invention is to provide mortar tubes that are lighter in weight than known mortar tubes.
Another object of the invention is to provide finless mortar tubes in the 60 mm and 81 mm sizes.
A further object of the invention is to provide light-weight, finless mortar tubes that can withstand rapid, continuous firing rates without plastic deformation.
One aspect of the invention is a mortar tube comprising a tube having no cooling fins, made of a superalloy, and having a nominal constant inside diameter of about 60 mm; the tube comprising, seriatim, a breech end, a beginning taper point, an ending taper point, a lower clamp region, an upper clamp region, and a muzzle end; a nominal wall thickness of the tube being constant from forward of the breech end to the beginning taper point and the nominal wall thickness of the tube decreasing from the beginning taper point to the ending taper point; wherein the tube does not undergo plastic deformation when firing 30 rounds per minute for four minutes and 20 rounds per minute continuous thereafter, at a maximum pressure of about 10,080 psi.
Another aspect of the invention is a mortar tube comprising a tube having no cooling fins, made of a superalloy, and having a nominal constant inside diameter of about 81 mm; the tube comprising, seriatim, a breech end, a beginning taper point, an ending taper point, a lower clamp region, an upper clamp region, and a muzzle end; a nominal wall thickness of the tube being constant from forward of the breech end to the beginning taper point and the nominal wall thickness of the tube decreasing from the beginning taper point to the ending taper point; wherein the tube does not undergo plastic deformation when firing 30 rounds per minute for two minutes and 15 rounds per minute continuous thereafter, at a maximum pressure of about 15,800 psi.
Further aspects of the invention are methods of making mortar tubes from superalloys.
The invention will be better understood, and further objects, features, and advantages thereof will become more apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the drawings, which are not necessarily to scale, like or corresponding parts are denoted by like or corresponding reference numerals.
The embodiments of the present invention are mortar tubes that do not have the cooling fins of conventional mortar tubes. The inventive mortar tubes are made of a high strength superalloy. Superalloys are known and typically fall into one of three types, iron based, cobalt based and nickel based. In general, the superalloys have material strengths greater than 140 ksi at tube temperatures greater than 1000 degrees Fahrenheit. The use of a higher strength material permits a thinner wall thickness, as compared to conventional tubes. The mortar tubes made according to the invention weigh approximately thirty percent less than conventional mortar tubes.
Many complex, interrelated and often conflicting factors influence the wall thickness of a mortar tube. Through years of work, the inventors have developed tube profiles for 60 mm and 81 mm finless mortar tubes made of a superalloy, such as Inconel 718 Factors considered include, inter alia, interior ballistics, heat transfer, temperature and pressure profiles, amount of charge per round (charge one to charge four), projectile weight, required rate of fire, wearing of the tube thickness, and stresses not induced by firing, for example, impact stresses caused by dropping the tube on the ground and stresses caused by attaching other components to the tube, such as a bipod. Both computer simulations and live firing test methods were used. Another factor that influences the wall thickness is the manufacturing method. Tubes of a given thickness profile may be satisfactorily produced using one manufacturing method, but another manufacturing method may require adjustments to the tube thickness.
The rate of fire (ROF) in number of rounds per minute (rds/min) is an important factor in determining the temperatures that a mortar tube will experience. The higher the ROF number, the higher the temperatures the mortar tube will experience. For an 81 mm finless mortar tube of conventional construction, the maximum ROF is 25 rds/min for 1 minute and 5 rds/min sustained. The conventional tube has a low ROF and is unable to satisfy future requirements for operational use.
In the invention, the performance criteria for the 60 mm and 81 mm tubes involve worst case firing conditions wherein the ambient air temperature is 145 F (63 C) and there is no wind related cooling (a calm day). In accordance with the requirements of STANAG 4110 (A NATO STANardization AGreement for the Definition of Pressure Terms and Their Interrelationship for Use in the Design and Proof of Cannons or Mortars and Ammunition), the mortar tube must be able to function within its design requirements without undergoing plastic deformation when firing a 1 in a million max pressure.
The ROF for the inventive 60 mm tube is 30 rounds per minute for 4 minutes and 20 rounds per minute continuous thereafter. The 60 mm round is a charge four round with a 3 lbm projectile. The one in a million pressure for the 60 mm tube is 10,080 psi. For the 60 mm tube, the hottest temperature occurs during the first 4 minutes when the barrel is being fired at 30 rpm.
The ROF for the inventive 81 mm tube is 30 rounds per minute for 2 minutes and 15 rounds per minute continuous thereafter. The 81 mm round is a charge four round with a 9 lbm projectile. The one in a million pressure for the 81 mm tube is 15,800 psi. For the 81 mm tube, the hottest temperature is reached during the sustained firing period at 15 rpm.
Tube 20 has a nominal constant inside diameter of about 60 mm. Tube 20 includes a breech end 22, a beginning taper point 24, an ending taper point 26, a lower clamp region 28, an upper clamp region 30, and a muzzle end 32. In the embodiment of
The nominal wall thickness a of the tube 20 is constant from forward of the breech end 22 to the beginning taper point 24. The nominal constant wall thickness a is in a range of about 2.6 mm to about 3 mm and more preferably in a range of about 2.6 mm to about 2.83 mm.
The nominal wall thickness b of the tube 20 decreases from the beginning taper point 24 to the ending taper point 26. The taper of the outside surface of the tube 20 from the beginning taper point 24 to the ending taper point 26 is in a range of about −0.44 degrees to about −0.55 degrees and more preferably in a range of about −0.47 degrees to about −0.51 degrees. In one embodiment, the nominal wall thickness at the beginning taper point is about 2.6 mm and the nominal wall thickness at the ending taper point is about 1.67 mm. In another embodiment, the nominal wall thickness at the beginning taper point is about 2.83 mm and the nominal wall thickness at the ending taper point is about 1.97 mm.
The distance e from the muzzle end 32 to the beginning taper point 24 is in a range of about 590 mm to about 600 mm. The distance f from the muzzle end 32 to the ending taper point 26 is in a range of about 485 mm to about 495 mm. In a preferred embodiment, the distance e is about 594 mm and the distance f is about 490 mm.
The nominal wall thickness c may be constant from the ending taper point 26 to aft of the lower clamp region 28. The nominal constant wall thickness c from the ending taper point 26 to aft of the lower clamp region 28 may be in a range of about 1.67 mm to about 1.97 mm.
The nominal wall thickness d from the lower clamp region 28 to the upper clamp region 30 and from the upper clamp region 30 to the muzzle end 32 may be constant. The nominal constant wall thickness d may be in a range of about 1.5 mm to about 2 mm. In one embodiment, the constant nominal wall thickness d is about 1.55 mm.
The edges 34, 36, 38, 40 of the lower and upper clamp regions 28, 30 have wall thicknesses that are greater than the adjacent nominal wall thicknesses. The wall thickness of the central area 42 of lower clamp region 28 may be about 1.85 mm. The wall thickness of the central area 44 of the upper clamp region 30 may be about 1.55 mm. Other areas of increased wall thickness include the muzzle end 32, the breech end 22 and rings 46, 48. Rings 46, 48 may be used to locate and contain a steel band (not shown) used to arm a projectile.
Tube 20 may be formed by, for example, forging and machining, or a metal flow-forming process. In general, if the tube 20 is forged and machined, the thinner wall thicknesses may be used. If the tube 20 is flow-formed, then the thicker wall thicknesses may be used.
Tube 50 has a nominal constant inside diameter of about 81 mm. Tube 50 includes a breech end 52, a beginning taper point 54, ending taper points 56 and 56′, a lower clamp region 58, an upper clamp region 60, a blast attenuation device 61, and a muzzle end 62. In the embodiment of
The nominal wall thickness h of the tube 50 is constant from forward of the breech end 52 to the beginning taper point 54. The nominal constant wall thickness h is in a range of about 4.97 mm to about 5.7 mm and more preferably in a range of about 4.97 mm to about 5.42 mm.
The nominal wall thickness i of the tube 50 decreases from the beginning taper point 54 to the ending taper point 56 or 56′. The taper of the outside surface of the tube 50 from the beginning taper point 54 to the ending taper point 56 or 56′ is in a range of about −0.60 degrees to about −0.90 degrees and preferably in a range of about −0.70 degrees to about −0.83 degrees.
In one embodiment, the nominal wall thickness at the beginning taper point 54 is about 4.97 mm and the nominal wall thickness at the ending taper point 56′ is about 2.8 mm. In another embodiment, the nominal wall thickness at the beginning taper point 54 is about 5.42 mm and the nominal wall thickness at the ending taper point 56 is about 3.26 mm.
The distance k from the muzzle end 62 to the beginning taper point 54 is in a range of about 880 mm to about 890 mm from the muzzle end 62. Preferably, the distance k is about 886 mm. In one embodiment, the ending taper point 56′ is just aft of the lower clamp region 58. In another embodiment, the distance l from the muzzle end 62 to the ending taper point 56 is in the range of about 730 mm to about 740 mm and the nominal constant wall thickness j from the ending taper point 56 to the lower clamp region 58 is in a range of about 3.24 mm to about 3.28 mm. Preferably, the distance l is about 737 mm.
The nominal wall thickness m decreases from the lower clamp region 58 to the upper clamp region 60. The taper of the outside surface of the tube 50 from the lower clamp region 58 to the upper clamp region 60 may be in a range of about −0.13 degrees to about 0.17 degrees. In one embodiment, the nominal wall thickness m decreases from about 2.1 mm forward of the lower clamp region 58 to about 1.61 mm aft of the upper clamp region 60. In another embodiment, the nominal wall thickness m decreases from about 2.21 mm forward of the lower clamp region 58 to about 1.71 mm aft of the upper clamp region 60.
A constant nominal wall thickness n from the upper clamp region 60 to aft of the blast attenuation device 61 may be in a range of about 1.6 mm to about 1.9 mm. Preferably, the constant nominal wall thickness n from the upper clamp region 60 to aft of the blast attenuation device 61 is about 1.63 mm.
The edges 64, 66, 68, 70 of the lower and upper clamp regions 58, 60 have wall thicknesses that are greater than the adjacent nominal wall thicknesses. The wall thickness of the central area 72 of lower clamp region 58 may be about 2.55 mm. The wall thickness of the central area 74 of the upper clamp region 60 may be about 2.55 mm. Other areas of increased wall thickness include the muzzle end 62 and the breech end 52.
Tube 50 may be formed by, for example, forging and machining, or a metal flow-forming process. In general, if the tube 50 is forged and machined, the thinner wall thicknesses may be used. If the tube 50 is flow-formed, then the thicker wall thicknesses may be used. Whether forged and machined, flow-formed or made with some other technique, the blast attenuation device 61 is formed integrally with the tube 50. In the past, the device 61 was a separate component that had to be added to the tube 50 after manufacture. Adding the device 61 to the tube 50 after manufacture was a costly process.
While the invention has been described with reference to certain preferred embodiments, numerous changes, alterations and modifications to the described embodiments are possible without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims, and equivalents thereof.
Espinosa, Ramon, Hathaway, IV, George E., Santiago, Jose, Tauscher, Steve, Becker, Richard F., Witherell, Mark D.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10118259, | Dec 11 2012 | AMERICAN FLOWFORM PRODUCTS, LLC | Corrosion resistant bimetallic tube manufactured by a two-step process |
10670363, | Oct 28 2016 | BAE SYSTEMS PLC | Noise attenuation device |
8302341, | May 26 2009 | AMERICAN FLOWFORM PRODUCTS, LLC | Stress induced crystallographic phase transformation and texturing in tubular products made of cobalt and cobalt alloys |
8671609, | May 26 2009 | AMERICAN FLOWFORM PRODUCTS, LLC | Stress induced crystallographic phase transformation and texturing in tubular products made of cobalt and cobalt alloys |
8910409, | Feb 09 2010 | AMERICAN FLOWFORM PRODUCTS, LLC | System and method of producing autofrettage in tubular components using a flowforming process |
9217619, | Mar 02 2011 | AMERICAN FLOWFORM PRODUCTS, LLC | Composite gun barrel with outer sleeve made from shape memory alloy to dampen firing vibrations |
9662740, | Aug 02 2004 | ATI PROPERTIES, INC | Method for making corrosion resistant fluid conducting parts |
9863732, | Aug 28 2013 | PROOF RESEARCH, INC | Lightweight composite mortar tube |
9939222, | Oct 23 2015 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Multi-layered mortar tube |
D889581, | Jun 27 2018 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Mortar training aid |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
1346188, | |||
1365987, | |||
1384718, | |||
1553825, | |||
2541114, | |||
2541116, | |||
2876095, | |||
2990342, | |||
3516326, | |||
3892163, | |||
4146077, | Oct 25 1977 | HAYNES INTERNATINAL, INC | Methods and apparatus for making cast hollows |
4198897, | Sep 10 1977 | Rheinmetall Industrie Aktiengesellschaft | Tank mortar |
4417459, | Jul 30 1981 | Equistar Chemicals, LP | Autofrettage process |
4571969, | Jul 30 1981 | National Distillers and Chemical Corporation | Autofrettage process |
4646615, | May 15 1984 | HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF CANADA, AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF NATIONAL DEFENCE, | Carbon fibre gun barrel |
4669212, | Oct 29 1984 | GENERAL DYNAMICS ARMAMENT SYSTEMS, INC | Gun barrel for use at high temperature |
4747225, | Dec 23 1982 | Vereinigte Edelstahlwerke Aktiengesellschaft | Weapon barrel with metallorgically bonded wear resistant liner |
4756677, | Dec 23 1982 | Vereinigte Edelstahlwerke Aktiengesellshaft | Method of manufacturing a weapon barrel |
5160802, | Sep 24 1975 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy | Prestressed composite gun tube |
5305679, | Apr 04 1991 | Giat Industries | Cylinder mortar |
5341719, | Dec 14 1992 | GENERAL DYNAMICS ARMAMENT SYSTEMS, INC | Multi-layer composite gun barrel |
5429032, | Aug 10 1994 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Lightweight mortar and baseplate apparatus |
5531150, | Mar 14 1994 | Lockheed Corporation; Lockheed Martin Corporation | Lightweight gun systems |
5677507, | Aug 23 1995 | Rheinmetall Industrie GmbH | Rear-loaded mortar having a breechlock plug and a loading tray |
5856631, | Nov 20 1996 | NITINOL TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Gun barrel |
5928799, | Jun 14 1995 | Ultramet | High temperature, high pressure, erosion and corrosion resistant composite structure |
5935351, | Jun 14 1995 | Ultramet | Method for making a high temperature, high pressure, erosion and corrosion resistant composite structure |
6059573, | Mar 20 1998 | MEGGITT TRAINING SYSTEMS, INC | Mortar training device with functional simulated propelling charges |
6298764, | Jul 17 1997 | Ultramet | Flash suppressor |
6615702, | Nov 20 1995 | Nitinol Technologies, Inc. | Gun barrel |
6851348, | Jul 05 1999 | SINGAPORE TECHNOLOGIES KINETICS LTD | Artillery firing mechanism |
6912945, | Dec 29 1999 | SINGAPORE TECHNOLOGIES KINETICS LIMITED | Artillery firing system |
7182014, | Oct 16 2002 | Rescue Academy Inc. | Gun barrel for launching projectiles |
7421934, | Sep 01 2005 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Mortar tube for training |
7601232, | Oct 01 2004 | AMERICAN FLOWFORM PRODUCTS, LLC | α-β titanium alloy tubes and methods of flowforming the same |
7735408, | Oct 14 2004 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | Mortar tube with cooling fin |
20010006018, | |||
20050034346, | |||
20060288854, | |||
20070221051, | |||
20100236122, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Mar 27 2008 | BECKER, RICHARD | U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020983 | /0436 | |
Mar 27 2008 | WITHERALL, MARK | U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020983 | /0436 | |
Mar 27 2008 | HATHAWAY, GEORGE | U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020983 | /0436 | |
Apr 01 2008 | ESPINOSA, RAMON | U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020983 | /0436 | |
Apr 08 2008 | SANTIAGO, JOSE | U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020983 | /0436 | |
Apr 09 2008 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
May 17 2008 | TAUSCHER, STEVE | U S GOVERNMENT AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020983 | /0436 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 17 2014 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Feb 11 2019 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jul 29 2019 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jun 21 2014 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Dec 21 2014 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 21 2015 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jun 21 2017 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jun 21 2018 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Dec 21 2018 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 21 2019 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jun 21 2021 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jun 21 2022 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Dec 21 2022 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jun 21 2023 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jun 21 2025 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |