A method for growing planar, semi-polar nitride film on a miscut spinel substrate, in which a large area of the planar, semi-polar nitride film is parallel to the substrate's surface. The planar films and substrates are: (1) {10
|
1. A nitride film, comprising:
a semi-polar nitride film grown on a semi-polar plane of a substrate, such that a surface of the semi-polar nitride film is planar and parallel to a surface of the semi-polar plane of the substrate.
9. A method for growing a nitride film, comprising:
growing a semi-polar nitride film on a semi-polar plane of a substrate, such that a surface of the semi-polar nitride film is planar and parallel to a surface of the semi-polar plane of the substrate.
2. The film of
3. The film of
4. The film of
5. The film of
6. The film of
7. The film of
8. The film of
10. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. The method of
16. The method of
|
This application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. §120 of and commonly-assigned U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/621,482, filed on Jan. 9, 2007 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,704,331, by Troy J. Baker, Benjamin A. Haskell, Paul T. Fini, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR THE GROWTH OF PLANAR SEMI-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE,”which application is a continuation under 35 U.S.C. §120 of U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 11/372,914, filed on Mar. 10, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,220,324, by Troy J. Baker, Benjamin A. Haskell, Paul T. Fini, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR THE GROWTH OF PLANAR SEMI-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE,”now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,220,324 on May 22, 2007, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/660,283, filed on Mar. 10, 2005, by Troy J. Baker, Benjamin A. Haskell, Paul T. Fini, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR THE GROWTH OF PLANAR SEMI-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE,”; all of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
This application is related to the following co-pending and commonly-assigned applications:
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/686,244, filed on Jun. 1, 2005, by Robert M. Farrell, Troy J. Baker, Arpan Chakraborty, Benjamin A. Haskell, P. Morgan Pattison, Rajat Sharma, Umesh K. Mishra, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR THE GROWTH AND FABRICATION OF SEMIPOLAR (Ga, Al, In, B)N THIN FILMS, HETEROSTRUCTURES, AND DEVICES,”;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/698,749, filed on Jul. 13, 2005, by Troy J. Baker, Benjamin A. Haskell, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “LATERAL GROWTH METHOD FOR DEFECT REDUCTION OF SEMIPOLAR NITRIDE FILMS,”;
U.S. Provisional Patent application Ser. No. 60/715,491, filed on Sep. 9, 2005, by Michael Iza, Troy J. Baker, Benjamin A. Haskell, Steven P. DenBaars, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR ENHANCING GROWTH OF SEMIPOLAR (Al, In, Ga, B)N VIA METALORGANIC CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION,”;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/760,739, filed on Jan. 20, 2006, by John F. Kaeding, Michael Iza, Troy J. Baker, Hitoshi Sato, Benjamin A. Haskell, James S. Speck, Steven P. DenBaars, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR IMPROVED GROWTH OF SEMIPOLAR (Al, In, Ga, B)N,”;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/760,628, filed on Jan. 20, 2006, by Hitoshi Sato, John F. Keading, Michael Iza, Troy J. Baker, Benjamin A. Haskell, Steven P. DenBaars, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR ENHANCING GROWTH OF SEMIPOLAR (Al, In, Ga, B)N VIA METALORGANIC CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION,”;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/772,184, filed on Feb. 10, 2006, by John F. Kaeding, Hitoshi Sato, Michael Iza, Hirokuni Asamizu, Hong Zhong, Steven P. DenBaars, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR CONDUCTIVITY CONTROL OF SEMIPOLAR (Al, In, Ga, B)N,”;
U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/774,467, filed on Feb. 17, 2006, by Hong Zhong, John F. Kaeding, Rajat Sharma, James S. Speck, Steven P. DenBaars, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “METHOD FOR GROWTH OF SEMIPOLAR (Al, In, Ga, B) N OPTOELECTRONICS DEVICES,”;
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/537,644, filed Jun. 6, 2005, by Benjamin A. Haskell, Michael D. Craven, Paul T. Fini, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “GROWTH OF REDUCED DISLOCATION DENSITY NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE BY HYDRIDE VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY,”, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 365(c) of International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/21918, filed Jul. 15, 2003, by Benjamin A. Haskell, Michael D. Craven, Paul T. Fini, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “GROWTH OF REDUCED DISLOCATION DENSITY NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE BY HYDRIDE VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY,”, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/433,843, filed Dec. 16, 2002, by Benjamin A. Haskell, Michael D. Craven, Paul T. Fini, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “GROWTH OF REDUCED DISLOCATION DENSITY NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE BY HYDRIDE VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY,”;
U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 10/537,385, filed Jun. 3, 2005, by Benjamin A. Haskell, Paul T. Fini, Shigemasa Matsuda, Michael D. Craven, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “GROWTH OF PLANAR, NON-POLAR A-PLANE GALLIUM NITRIDE BY HYDRIDE VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY,”, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 365(c) of International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/21916, filed Jul. 15, 2003, by Benjamin A. Haskell, Paul T. Fini, Shigemasa Matsuda, Michael D. Craven, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “GROWTH OF PLANAR, NON-POLAR A-PLANE GALLIUM NITRIDE BY HYDRIDE VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY,”, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/433,844, filed Dec. 16, 2002, by Benjamin A. Haskell, Paul T. Fini, Shigemasa Matsuda, Michael D. Craven, Steven P. DenBaars, James S. Speck, and Shuji Nakamura, entitled “TECHNIQUE FOR THE GROWTH OF PLANAR, NON-POLAR A-PLANE GALLIUM NITRIDE BY HYDRIDE VAPOR PHASE EPITAXY,”;
U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 10/413,691, filed Apr. 15, 2003, by Michael D. Craven and James S. Speck, entitled “NON-POLAR A-PLANE GALLIUM NITRIDE THIN FILMS GROWN BY METALORGANIC CHEMICAL VAPOR DEPOSITION,”, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/372,909, filed Apr. 15, 2002, by Michael D. Craven, Stacia Keller, Steven P. DenBaars, Tal Margalith, James S. Speck, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED THIN FILMS AND HETEROSTRUCTURE MATERIALS,”;
U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 10/413,690, filed Apr. 15, 2003, by Michael D. Craven, Stacia Keller, Steven P. DenBaars, Tal Margalith, James S. Speck, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “NON-POLAR (Al, B, In, Ga)N QUANTUM WELL AND HETEROSTRUCTURE MATERIALS AND DEVICES, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/372,909, filed Apr. 15, 2002, by Michael D. Craven, Stacia Keller, Steven P. DenBaars, Tal Margalith, James S. Speck, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED THIN FILMS AND HETEROSTRUCTURE MATERIALS,”;
U.S. Utility patent application Ser. No. 10/413,913, filed Apr. 15, 2003, by Michael D. Craven, Stacia Keller, Steven P. DenBaars, Tal Margalith, James S. Speck, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “DISLOCATION REDUCTION IN NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE THIN FILMS,”, which application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. Section 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/372,909, filed Apr. 15, 2002, by Michael D. Craven, Stacia Keller, Steven P. DenBaars, Tal Margalith, James S. Speck, Shuji Nakamura, and Umesh K. Mishra, entitled “NON-POLAR GALLIUM NITRIDE BASED THIN FILMS AND HETEROSTRUCTURE MATERIALS,”;
International Patent Application No. PCT/US03/39355, filed Dec. 11, 2003, by Michael D. Craven and Steven P. DenBaars, entitled “NONPOLAR (Al, B, In, Ga)N QUANTUM WELLS,”, which application is a continuation-in-part of the above-identified Patent Application Nos. PCT/U503/21918 (30794.93-WO-U1), PCT/U503/21916 (30794.94-WO-U1), Ser. No. 10/413,691 (30794.100-US-U1), Ser. No. 10/413,690 (30794.101-US-U1), Ser. No. 10/413,913 (30794.102-US-U1);
all of which applications are incorporated by reference herein.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a technique for the growth of planar semi-polar gallium nitride.
2. Description of the Related Art
The usefulness of gallium nitride (GaN), and its ternary and quaternary compounds incorporating aluminum and indium (AlGaN, InGaN, AlInGaN), has been well established for fabrication of visible and ultraviolet optoelectronic devices and high-power electronic devices. These devices are typically grown epitaxially using growth techniques including molecular beam epitaxy (MBE), metalorganic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD), and hydride vapor phase epitaxy (HVPE).
GaN and its alloys are most stable in the hexagonal würtzite crystal structure, in which the structure is described by two (or three) equivalent basal plane axes that are rotated 120° with respect to each other (the a-axes), all of which are perpendicular to a unique c-axis. Group III and nitrogen atoms occupy alternating c-planes along the crystal's c-axis. The symmetry elements included in the würtzite structure dictate that III-nitrides possess a bulk spontaneous polarization along this c-axis, and the würtzite structure exhibits piezoelectric polarization.
Current nitride technology for electronic and optoelectronic devices employs nitride films grown along the polar c-direction. However, conventional c-plane quantum well structures in III-nitride based optoelectronic and electronic devices suffer from the undesirable quantum-confined Stark effect (QCSE), due to the existence of strong piezoelectric and spontaneous polarizations. The strong built-in electric fields along the c-direction cause spatial separation of electrons and holes that in turn give rise to restricted carrier recombination efficiency, reduced oscillator strength, and red-shifted emission.
One approach to eliminating the spontaneous and piezoelectric polarization effects in GaN optoelectronic devices is to grow the devices on non-polar planes of the crystal. Such planes contain equal numbers of Ga and N atoms and are charge-neutral. Furthermore, subsequent non-polar layers are equivalent to one another so the bulk crystal will not be polarized along the growth direction. Two such families of symmetry-equivalent non-polar planes in GaN are the {11
Another approach to reducing or possibly eliminating the polarization effects in GaN optoelectronic devices is to grow the devices on semi-polar planes of the crystal. The term “semi-polar planes” can be used to refer to a wide variety of planes that possess both two nonzero h, i, or k Miller indices and a nonzero 1 Miller index. Some commonly observed examples of semi-polar planes in c-plane GaN heteroepitaxy include the {11
The other cause of polarization is piezoelectric polarization. This occurs when the material experiences a compressive or tensile strain, as can occur when (Al, In, Ga, B)N layers of dissimilar composition (and therefore different lattice constants) are grown in a nitride heterostructure. For example, a thin AlGaN layer on a GaN template will have in-plane tensile strain, and a thin InGaN layer on a GaN template will have in-plane compressive strain, both due to lattice matching to the GaN. Therefore, for an InGaN quantum well on GaN, the piezoelectric polarization will point in the opposite direction than that of the spontaneous polarization of the InGaN and GaN. For an AlGaN layer latticed matched to GaN, the piezoelectric polarization will point in the same direction as that of the spontaneous polarization of the AlGaN and GaN.
The advantage of using semi-polar planes over c-plane nitrides is that the total polarization will be reduced. There may even be zero polarization for specific alloy compositions on specific planes. Such scenarios will be discussed in detail in future scientific papers. The important point is that the polarization will be reduced compared to that of c-plane nitride structures.
Bulk crystals of GaN are not available, so it is not possible to simply cut a crystal to present a surface for subsequent device regrowth. Commonly, GaN films are initially grown heteroepitaxially, i.e. on foreign substrates that provide a reasonable lattice match to GaN.
Semi-polar GaN planes have been demonstrated on the sidewalls of patterned c-plane oriented stripes. Nishizuka et al. have grown {11
However, this method of producing semi-polar planes is drastically different than that of the present invention; it is an artifact from epitaxial lateral overgrowth (ELO). ELO is used to reduce defects in GaN and other semiconductors. It involves patterning stripes of a mask material, often SiO2 for GaN. The GaN is grown from open windows between the mask and then grown over the mask. To form a continuous film, the GaN is then coalesced by lateral growth. The facets of these stripes can be controlled by the growth parameters. If the growth is stopped before the stripes coalesce, then a small area of semi-polar plane can be exposed. The surface area may be 10 μm wide at best. Moreover, the semi-polar plane will be not parallel to the substrate surface. In addition, the surface area is too small to process into a semi-polar LED. Furthermore, forming device structures on inclined facets is significantly more difficult than forming those structures on normal planes.
The present invention describes a technique for the growth of planar films of semi-polar nitrides, in which a large area of (Al, In, Ga)N is parallel to the substrate surface. For example, samples are often grown on 10 mm×10 mm or 2 inch diameter substrates compared to the few micrometer wide areas previously demonstrated for the growth of semi-polar nitrides.
The present invention describes a method for growing semi-polar nitrides as planar films, such as {10
Referring now to the drawings in which like reference numbers represent corresponding parts throughout:
In the following description of the preferred embodiment, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration a specific embodiment in which the invention may be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Overview
Growth of semi-polar nitride semiconductors, for example, {10
Until now, no means existed for growing large area, high quality films of semi-polar nitrides suitable for use as device layers, templates, or substrates in device growth. The novel feature of this invention is the establishment that semi-polar nitrides can be grown as planar films. As evidence, the inventors have grown {10
Technical Description
The present invention comprises a method for growing planar nitride films in which a large area of the semi-polar nitrides is parallel to a substrate surface. Examples of this are {10
However, {10
{10
Also, planar films of {11
Thus, there has been experimentally proven four examples of planar semi-polar nitride films:
1) {10
2) {10
3) {11
4) {10
These films were grown using an HVPE system in Shuji Nakamura's lab at the University of California, Santa Barbara. A general outline of growth parameters for both {10
Process Steps
Block 10 represents the optional step of preparing the substrate. For example, the preparation may involve performing a miscut of the substrate. For the growth of {10
Block 12 represents the step of loading the substrate into an HVPE reactor. The reactor is evacuated to at least 9E-2 ton to remove oxygen, then it is backfilled with nitrogen.
Block 14 represents the step of turning on the furnace and ramping the temperate of the reactor under conditions to encourage nitridization of the surface of the substrate.
Block 16 represents the step of performing a gas flow. The process generally flows nitrogen, hydrogen, and/or ammonia over the substrate at atmospheric pressure. Block 18 represents the step of reducing the pressure in the reactor. The furnace setpoint is 1000° C., and when it reaches this temperature, the pressure of the reactor is reduced to 62.5 torr.
Block 20 represents the step of performing a GaN growth. After the pressure is reduced, the ammonia flow is set to 1.0 slpm (standard liters per minute), and HCl (hydrogen chloride) flow over Ga (gallium) of 75 sccm (standard cubic centimeters per minute) is initiated to start the growth of GaN.
Block 22 represents the step of cooling down the reactor. After 20 to 60 minutes of GaN growth time, the HCl flow is stopped, and the reactor is cooled down while flowing ammonia to preserve the GaN film.
The end result of these steps comprises a planar, semi-polar nitride film in which a large surface area (at least 10 mm×10 mm or a 2 inch diameter) of the planar, semi-polar nitride film is parallel to the substrate's surface.
Although the process steps are described in conjunction with a spinel substrate, m-plane sapphire can be used to grow either {11
After the semi-polar film has been grown using the HVPE system, Block 22 represents the step of growing device layers on the substrate using MOCVD or MBE. This step usually involves doping the nitride layers with n-type and p-type, and growing one or several quantum wells in the regrowth layer. An LED can be made in this step using standard LED processing methods in a cleanroom.
Possible Modifications and Variations
The scope of this invention covers more than just the particular examples cited. This idea is pertinent to all nitrides on any semi-polar plane. For example, one could grow {10
The research that was performed in Shuji Nakamura's Lab at University of California, Santa Barbara, was done using HVPE; however, direct grow of semi-polar planes of nitrides should be possible using MOCVD and MBE as well. The epitaxial relations should be the same for most growth method, although it can vary as seen in the example of GaN on m-plane sapphire. For example, an MOCVD grown {10
The reactor conditions will vary by reactor type and design. The growth described here is only a description of one set of conditions that has been found to be useful conditions for the growth of semi-polar GaN. It was also discovered that these films will grow under a wide parameter space of pressure, temperature, gas flows, etc., all of which will generate planar semi-polar nitride film.
There are other steps that could vary in the growth process. A nucleation layer has been found unnecessary for our reactor conditions; however, it may or may not be necessary to use a nucleation layer for other reactors, which is common practice in the growth of GaN films. It has also been found that nitridizing the substrate improves surface morphology for some films, and determines the actual plane grown for other films. However, this may or may not be necessary for any particular growth technique.
Advantages and Improvements
The existing practice is to grow GaN with the c-plane normal to the surface. This plane has a spontaneous polarization and piezoelectric polarization which are detrimental to device performance. The advantage of semi-polar over c-plane nitride films is the reduction in polarization and the associated increase in internal quantum efficiency for certain devices.
Non-polar planes could be used to completely eliminate polarization effects in devices. However, these planes are quite difficult to grow, thus non-polar nitride devices are not currently in production. The advantage of semi-polar over non-polar nitride films is the ease of growth. It has been found that semi-polar planes have a large parameter space in which they will grow. For example, non-polar planes will not grow at atmospheric pressure, but semi-polar planes have been experimentally demonstrated to grow from 62.5 torr to 760 torr, but probably have an even wider range than that. {1
The advantage of planar semi-polar films over ELO sidewall is the large surface area that can be processed into an LED or other device. Another advantage is that the growth surface is parallel to the substrate surface, unlike that of ELO sidewall semi-polar planes.
In summary, the present invention establishes that planar semi-polar films of nitrides can be grown. This has been experimentally confirmed for four separate cases. The previously discussed advantages will be pertinent to all planar semi-polar films.
The following references are incorporated by reference herein:
[1] Takeuchi, Tetsuya, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 39, (2000), pp. 413-416. This paper is a theoretical study of the polarity of semi-polar GaN films.
[2] Nishizuka, K., Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 85 No. 15, 11 Oct. 2004. This paper is a study of {11
[3] T. J. Baker, B. A. Haskell, F. Wu, J. S. Speck, and S. Nakamura, “Characterization of Planar Semipolar Gallium Nitride Films on Spinel Substrates,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 44, No. 29, (2005), L920.
[4] A. Chakraborty, T. J. Baker, B. A. Haskell, F. Wu, J. S. Speck, S. P. Denbaars, S. Nakamura, and U. K. Mishra, “Milliwatt Power Blue InGaN/GaN Light-Emitting Diodes on Semipolar GaN Templates,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 44, No. 30 (2005), L945.
[5] R. Sharma, P. M. Pattison, H. Masui, R. M. Farrell, T. J. Baker, B. A. Haskell, F. Wu, S. P. Denbaars, J. S. Speck, and S. Nakamura, “Demonstration of a Semipolar (10-1-3) InGaN/GaN Green Light Emitting Diode,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 231110 (2005).
[6] T. J. Baker, B. A. Haskell, F. Wu, J. S. Speck, and S. Nakamura, “Characterization of Planar Semipolar Gallium Nitride Films on Sapphire Substrates,” Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 45, No. 6, (2006), L154.
This concludes the description of the preferred embodiment of the present invention. The foregoing description of one or more embodiments of the invention has been presented for the purposes of illustration and description. It is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise form disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention be limited not by this detailed description, but rather by the claims appended hereto.
DenBaars, Steven P., Speck, James S., Haskell, Benjamin A., Baker, Troy J., Fini, Paul T., Nakamua, Shuji
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10529892, | Jun 01 2005 | The Regents of the University of California; Japan Science and Technology Agency | Technique for the growth and fabrication of semipolar (Ga,Al,In,B)N thin films, heterostructures, and devices |
8686466, | Jun 01 2005 | The Regents of the University of California; Japan Science and Technology Agency | Technique for the growth and fabrication of semipolar (Ga,Al,In,B)N thin films, heterostructures, and devices |
9231376, | Jun 01 2005 | The Regents of the University of California; Japan Science and Technology Agency | Technique for the growth and fabrication of semipolar (Ga,Al,In,B)N thin films, heterostructures, and devices |
9793435, | Jun 01 2005 | The Regents of the University of California; Japan Science and Technology Agency | Technique for the growth and fabrication of semipolar (Ga,Al,In,B)N thin films, heterostructures, and devices |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6153010, | Apr 11 1997 | Nichia Corporation | Method of growing nitride semiconductors, nitride semiconductor substrate and nitride semiconductor device |
6218280, | Jun 18 1998 | University of Florida | Method and apparatus for producing group-III nitrides |
6440823, | Jan 27 1994 | WOLFSPEED, INC | Low defect density (Ga, Al, In)N and HVPE process for making same |
6599362, | Jan 03 2001 | National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC | Cantilever epitaxial process |
6847057, | Aug 01 2003 | Lumileds LLC | Semiconductor light emitting devices |
7009215, | Oct 24 2003 | SLT Technologies, Inc | Group III-nitride based resonant cavity light emitting devices fabricated on single crystal gallium nitride substrates |
7220324, | Mar 10 2005 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Technique for the growth of planar semi-polar gallium nitride |
7361576, | May 31 2005 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Defect reduction of non-polar and semi-polar III-Nitrides with sidewall lateral epitaxial overgrowth (SLEO) |
7575947, | Sep 09 2005 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Method for enhancing growth of semi-polar (Al,In,Ga,B)N via metalorganic chemical vapor deposition |
7691658, | Jan 20 2006 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Method for improved growth of semipolar (Al,In,Ga,B)N |
7846757, | Jun 01 2005 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | Technique for the growth and fabrication of semipolar (Ga,A1,In,B)N thin films, heterostructures, and devices |
20020074561, | |||
20030015708, | |||
20030178702, | |||
20030198837, | |||
20030230235, | |||
20040238810, | |||
20040245535, | |||
20040251471, | |||
20040261692, | |||
20050214992, | |||
20060008941, | |||
20060138431, | |||
20070022940, | |||
20070093073, | |||
20070111531, | |||
20070190758, | |||
20070218703, | |||
20070252164, | |||
20080163814, | |||
20080179607, | |||
20080224268, | |||
20080230766, | |||
20090081857, | |||
20090134410, | |||
20090146162, | |||
20090146185, | |||
20090155947, | |||
20090168453, | |||
20090250686, | |||
EP383215, | |||
EP1385196, | |||
WO3089694, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 01 2010 | The Regents of the University of California | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 01 2010 | Japan Science and Technology Agency | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 07 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 15 2019 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 15 2019 | M1555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Large Entity. |
Sep 06 2023 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 06 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 06 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 06 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 06 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 06 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 06 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 06 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 06 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 06 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 06 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 06 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 06 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |