Disclosed are a method and a control system for applying defined clamping forces in a brake that is electrically operable by means of an actuator and includes a first friction surface (friction lining) and a second friction surface (brake disc). In the method, a correlation exists between the actuator position and the clamping force, and values of the clamping force as well as of the actuator position are determined by a clamping force sensor and a position sensor, and a value of the actuator position is determined, which corresponds to the application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface.
|
1. A method for applying defined clamping forces in a brake that is electrically operable by an actuator and includes a first friction surface (friction lining) and a second friction surface (brake disc), in between which a clearance is allowed, the method comprising:
determining an application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface;
determining actual values (Fmeas) of a clamping force by a clamping force sensor that is communicated to a control system;
determining an actual value (φmeas) by a position sensor that is communicated to the control system, wherein a correlation exists between the actuator position (φmeas) and the clamping force (Fmeas), with a value ((φ0) of the actuator position being determined which corresponds to the application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface with the control system,
continuously low-pass filtering the actual values of the actuator position (φmeas) and of the clamping force (Fmeas) within the control system;
determining time derivatives (φmeas,filtp, Fmeas,filtp) of the filtered values of the actuator position (φmeas,filt) and the clamping force (Fmeas,filt);
producing a quotient Q=Fmeas,filtp/φmeas,filtp;
calculating an assessed value (φ0,assess) of the actuator position according to the formula
φ0,assess=φmeas,filt−Fmeas,filt/q; subjecting the calculated assessed value (φ0,assess) to a plausibility check with a plausibilsation module of the control system;
filtering the plausibilised assessed value (φ0,plan) in a low-pass filter of nth order within the control system to obtain, the output quantity of the value (φ0) of the actuator position that indicates the application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface; and
controlling the actuator to apply a defined claiming force in the brake based on the determined value (φ0) with the control system.
5. A control system for applying defined clamping forces in a brake that is electrically operable by an actuator and includes a first friction surface (friction lining) and a second friction surface (brake disc), the control system comprising:
a clamping force sensor (5) for determining a clamping force (F);
a position sensor (6) for determining the actuator position (φ), wherein a correlation exists between the actuator position (φ) and the clamping force (F);
a first controller (1), to which signals representative of a clamping force nominal value (Fnominal) and a clamping force actual value (Factual) and signals representative of an actuator position actual value (φmeas) are sent as input quantities, and the output quantity of the first controller corresponds to an actuator speed nominal value (nnominal);
a second controller (2) that is connected downstream of the first controller and to which signals representative of the actuator speed nominal value (nnominal) and an actuator speed actual value (nactual) are sent as input quantities, and the output quantity of the second controller corresponds to an actuator torque nominal value (Mnominal);
a third controller (3) that is connected downstream of the second controller and to which signals representative of the actuator torque nominal value (Mnominal) and an actual value (Iactual) of the current to be supplied to the actuator are sent as input quantities, and the output quantity of the third controller represents a correcting variable (U) for adjusting the actual value (Iactual) of the current to be supplied to the actuator; and
an application-point identification module (8), to which signals representative of the actual value of the position (φmeas) measured at the actuator (4) and the actual value of the actuating force (Fmeas) measured at the actuator (4) are sent as input quantities, and the output quantity of which represents a value (φ0) of the actuator position, which corresponds to the application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface, with the signal representative of the actuator position actual value (φactual) being produced by subtraction of the value (φ0) from the signal representative of the value of the measured actuator position (φmeas), wherein the application-point identification module (8) includes low-pass filters (12, 13) of nth order for low-pass filtering of signals representative of the actual value of the position (φmeas) measured at the actuator (4) and the actual value of the actuating force (Fmeas) measured at the actuator (4), and differentiators (14, 15) are connected downstream of the low-pass filters for producing the time derivative of the filtered signals of the actuator position ((φmeas,filt) and the clamping force (φmeas,filt), the output quantities of which (φmeas,filtp, Fmeas,filtp) are sent to a first multiplication module (16) for calculating a quotient Q=Fmeas,filtp/φmeas,filtp, connected downstream of the latter is a second multiplication module (17) in which the filtered value of the clamping force (Fmeas,filt) is divided by the quotient q, and connected downstream of which is an addition module (18) in which the assessed value (φ0,assess) of the actuator position is calculated according to the formula (φ0,assess=φmeas,filt−Fmeas,filt/q).
2. A method according to
3. A method according to
4. A method according to
6. A system according to
7. A system according to
|
This application is the U.S. national phase of international application PCT/EP05/51671 filed Apr. 15, 2005, which designated the U.S. and which claims the benefit of priority of German Patent Application Number 10 2005 011 267.6 filed Mar. 11, 2005 and German Patent Application Number 10 2004 018 729.0 filed Apr. 17, 2004. The contents of each of the aforementioned documents are incorporated herein in their entirety.
The present invention relates to a method for applying defined clamping forces in a brake that is electrically operable by means of an actuator and includes a first friction surface (friction lining) and a second friction surface (brake disc), in between which a clearance is allowed, wherein the application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface is determined, wherein a correlation exists between the actuator position and the clamping force, wherein values of the clamping force as well as of the actuator position are determined, the values being measured by means of a clamping force sensor and a position sensor, with an assessed value of the actuator position being produced which corresponds to the application of the first friction surface on the second friction surface.
International patent application WO 01/68428 discloses a method and a control system for applying defined clamping forces in a disc brake that is operable by means of an electric motor using a reduction gear. The special features of the prior art method involve that the above-mentioned correlation between the actuator position and the clamping force is illustrated by a mathematical model, preferably by a polynomial of second order. When realizing the prior art method, however, updating of the assessed value of the actuator position which is referred to as position sensor offset valve, does not occur continuously, but with a time delay, namely only after each new assessment of the unknown parameters of the mathematical model.
In view of the above, an object of the invention is to disclose a method and a control system permitting the continuous provision of current assessed values without time delays, in particular in order to adapt the point of application when wear of the brake linings during a brake operation cannot be ignored, what may happen e.g. at very high temperatures of the brake.
According to the present method, this object is achieved in that
To render the idea of the invention more precise, it is arranged for that the calculated assessed value is considered as a plausible assessed value only if the filtered clamping force actual value associated with this assessed value lies within a predefined interval Fmin<Fmeas,filt<Fmax. On the one hand, it can be avoided thereby that interferences are included overproportionally in the assessed value (Fmeas,filt<Fmin). On the other hand, it can be avoided that the assessed value, due to the linear approach, exhibits excessive deviations from the real application point (Fmeas,filt>Fmin). In an improvement of the method of the invention, the assessed values are regarded as implausible and are not considered when the quotient Q is negative, because negative values are assumed to not exist physically and, thus, can only be attributed to interferences on the detected signals.
Low-pass filtering, however, especially the production of the time derivatives of the filtered values of the actuator position and the clamping force are favorably based on a calculation algorithm, which uses an approximation of the last 2n+1 measured values by means of a polynomial of second order (f(t)=at2+bt+c), in which the filtered values and their time derivatives correspond to the parameters of the polynomial at the point n+1. This procedure is repeated with each newly added measured value. The derivative signals are respectively delayed by n moments in relation to the current measured value when 2n+1 measuring points are used for the approximation. When 2n+1=three measuring points are used, the parameters a, b and c describing the polynomial are determined without approximation so that filtering of the measured values does not yet prevail, but only a calculation of the first derivative (f′(t)=2at+b) and second derivative (f″(t)=2a) is possible. When using more than three measured values (e.g. 5, 7, 9 . . . ), the measured values will additionally be filtered because the parameters a, b, c are then determined by means of the method of least squares.
The control system of the invention for implementing the method explained hereinabove generally comprises:
The control system of the invention is favorably characterized by the fact that the application-point identification module includes low-pass filters of nth order for low-pass filtering of signals representative of the actual value of the position measured at the actuator and the actual value of the actuating force measured at the actuator, and differentiators are connected downstream of the low-pass filters for producing the time derivative of the filtered signals of the actuator position ((φmeas,filt) and the clamping force (Fmeas,filt), the output quantities of which (φmeas,filtp, Fmeas,filtp) are sent to a first multiplication module for calculating a quotient Q=Fmeas,filtp/φmeas,filtp, connected downstream of the latter is a second multiplication module in which the filtered value of the clamping force (Fmeas,filt) is divided by the quotient Q, and connected downstream of which is an addition module in which the assessed value (φ0,assess) of the actuator position is calculated according to the formula (φ0=φmeas,filt/Q).
A favorable improvement of the control system of the invention resides in that connected downstream of the addition module is a plausibilisation module in which the assessed value together with the filtered values of the actuator position and the clamping force and their time derivatives are subjected to a plausibility check.
In a favorable improvement of the control system of the invention, the plausibilisation module is succeeded by a low-pass filter of nth order, in which the plausibilised assessed value undergoes a low-pass filtering operation for producing the value of the actuator position, which corresponds to the application point.
Further details, features, and advantages of the invention can be seen in the following description of an embodiment by making reference to the accompanying drawings showing a design of a control loop for implementing the method of the invention.
In the drawings:
The control system illustrated in
Further, it can be taken from
The input quantities of the speed controller 2 represent the output quantity of the force/travel controller 1 that corresponds to the actuator speed nominal value nnominal, and an actuator speed actual value nactual, which is produced in a differentiator 11 by differentiation of the above-mentioned signal φmeas that corresponds to the measured actuator position as a function of time. The output quantity of the speed controller 2 corresponds to a nominal value Mnominal of the brake torque applied by actuator 4.
The mode of operation of the control circuit illustrated in
As has already been mentioned,
The time derivatives Fmeas,filtp, φmeas,filtp of the filtered quantities are sent to a first multiplier 16 for producing the above-mentioned quotient Q=Fmeas,filtp/φmeas,filtp, while in a subsequent second multiplier 17 the filtered value of the clamping force Fmeas,filt measured at the actuator 4 is divided by the quotient Q. The output quantity of the second multiplier 17, i.e. the result of the division Fmeas,filt/Q, is subtracted in an addition module 18 from the filtered value of the actuator position φmeas,filt and is subjected to a plausibilisation test in a plausibilisation module 19 together with the filtered values of the actuator position (φmeas,filt) and the clamping force (Fmeas,filt) and their time derivatives (φmeas,filtp, Fmeas,filtp). If the filtered clamping force actual value (Fmeas,filt) associated with this assessed value (φ0,assess) lies within a predefined interval Fmin<Fmeas,filt<Fmax, the calculated assessed value (φ0,assess) is regarded as a plausible assessed value (φ0,plau). If, on the other hand, the quotient Q is negative, the assessed values (φ0,assess) are regarded as implausible and are not considered. The plausibilised assessed value (φ0,plau) is subsequently filtered in a low-pass filter 20 of nth order, the output quantity of which represents the position value (φ0) that corresponds to the application point of the first friction surface on the second friction surface.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6178369, | Jan 30 1998 | Continental Teves AG & Co., oHG | Method and regulating system for applying defined actuating forces |
6217131, | Jun 12 1998 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method and device for controlling a vehicle braking system in open loop |
6422659, | Dec 14 1999 | BWI COMPANY LIMITED S A | Estimated electric caliper clamp force based upon actuator motor position |
6435625, | Sep 29 1997 | Continental Teves AG & Co., oHG | Method for applying defined operating forces |
6662906, | Jul 14 1997 | Continental Teves AG & Co. oHG | System of controlling or regulating an electromechanical brake |
6848756, | Mar 15 2000 | CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO OHG | Method and control system for applying defined clamping forces |
6932438, | Jul 31 2001 | CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO OHG | Method for establishing the relationship between actuator position and actuator tensioning force |
7920951, | Apr 17 2004 | CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO , OHG | Method and control system for applying defined clamping forces |
20070282511, | |||
DE10205013, | |||
DE19730094, | |||
DE19826133, | |||
WO168428, | |||
WO3011668, | |||
WO9903714, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 15 2005 | Continental Teves AG & Co., oHG | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Oct 19 2006 | MARON, CHRISTOF | CONTINENTAL TEVES, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 019721 | /0996 | |
Oct 19 2006 | MARON, CHRISTOF | CONTINENTAL TEVES AG & CO , OHG | CORRECTIVE ASGNMT REEL FRAME 019721 0996 TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE S NAME | 019824 | /0204 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 09 2013 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Sep 02 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Nov 11 2019 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Apr 27 2020 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 20 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 20 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 20 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 20 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 20 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 20 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 20 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 20 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 20 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 20 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 20 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 20 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |