A first sigma filtering circuit sigma filters an image to produce a filtered image. An analysis circuit processes the sigma filtered image to produce an approximation part and a detail part. A second sigma filter circuit filters the approximation part to produce a sigma filtered approximation part. Another analysis circuit process the sigma filtered approximation part to produce a second approximation part and a second detail part. A third sigma filter circuit sigma filters the second approximation part to produce a sigma filtered second filtered approximation part. A first synthesizer synthesizes the sigma filtered second filtered approximation part and the second detailed part to produce a first reconstructed image, and a second synthesizer synthesizes the first reconstructed image and the first detail part to produce a final filtered image.
|
1. A method for improving the quality of a digital image comprising:
(a) obtaining a digital image;
(b) sigma filtering the digital image to produce a sigma filtered input image;
(c) analysis processing the sigma filtered input image to produce an approximation part and a detail part;
(d) sigma filtering the approximation part to produce a sigma filtered approximation part; and
(e) synthesizing the sigma filtered approximation part and the detail part to generate a reconstructed filtered image.
8. A system for improving the quality of a digital image comprising:
a first sigma filtering circuit to sigma filter digital image to produce a sigma filtered image;
an analysis circuit to process the sigma filtered image to produce an approximation part and a detail part;
a second sigma filter circuit to filter the approximation part to produce a sigma filtered approximation part; and
a synthesizer to combine the sigma filtered approximation part and the detail part to generate a reconstructed filtered image.
13. A system for improving the quality of a digital image comprising:
a first sigma filtering circuit to sigma filter a digital image to produce a sigma filtered image;
a first analysis circuit to process the sigma filtered image to produce an approximation part and a detail part;
a second sigma filter circuit to filter the approximation part to produce a sigma filtered approximation part;
a second analysis circuit to process the sigma filtered approximation part to produce a second approximation part and a second detail part;
a third sigma filter circuit to sigma filter the second approximation part to produce a sigma filtered second approximation part;
a first synthesizer to synthesize the sigma filtered second approximation part and the second detail part to produce a first reconstructed image; and
a second synthesizer to synthesize the first reconstructed image and the detail part to produce a final filtered image.
2. The method as claimed in
(e1) analysis processing the sigma filtered approximation part to produce a second approximation part and a second detail part;
(e2) sigma filtering the second approximation part to produce a sigma filtered second approximation part;
(e3) synthesizing the sigma filtered second approximation part and the second detail part to produce a first reconstructed image; and
(e4) synthesizing the first reconstructed image and the detail part to produce the final filtered image.
3. The method as claimed in
4. The method as claimed in
5. The method as claimed in
high pass filtering the digital image;
determining a standard deviation of the high pass filtered image; and
using the determined standard deviation as the sigma value.
6. The method as claimed in
7. The method as claimed in
(e3a) sigma filtering first reconstructed image prior to synthesizing the first reconstructed image and the detail part to produce the final filtered image.
9. The system as claimed in
a sigma circuit, operatively connected to said first and second sigma filter circuits, to determine a sigma value from the digital image.
10. The system as claimed in
a high pass filter circuit to high pass filter the digital image; and
a circuit to determine a standard deviation of the high pass filtered image, the determined standard deviation being the sigma value.
11. The system as claimed in
12. The system as claimed in
14. The system as claimed in
15. The system as claimed in
16. The system as claimed in
17. The system as claimed in
a sigma circuit, operatively connected to said first, second, and third sigma filter circuits, to determine a sigma value from the digital image.
18. The system as claimed in
a high pass filter circuit to high pass filter the digital image; and
a circuit to determine a standard deviation of the high pass filtered image, the determined standard deviation being the sigma value.
19. The system as claimed in
20. The system as claimed in
a fourth sigma filter to sigma filter the first reconstructed image to produce a sigma filtered first reconstructed image;
said second synthesizer synthesizing the sigma filtered first reconstructed image and the detail part to produce the final filtered image.
|
Often it is desired to improve the quality of an original image by utilizing various digital processing techniques. While there exist many software programs that allow a person to perform a wide variety of processing on a digital image, these programs require intensive personal input and often a high level of training to be used effectively. Consequently, there has been a parallel development of techniques that can automatically analyze a digital image and, without any human involvement, improve the image quality.
One particular problem that is commonly encountered is the presence of noise in a digital image. This noise can arise for a variety of reasons and includes both systematic or regular noise and random noise. A number of techniques have been devised to automatically remove noise from a digital image. One common technique is to simply apply some sort of low pass or averaging filter to the image. While this technique and similar techniques are effective in reducing or eliminating noise, simple filtering techniques suffer from the disadvantage that simple filtering also tends to blur the image, reducing its visual quality.
One conventional method for reducing or eliminating noise while avoiding the problem of blurring the image utilizes a sigma filter. The sigma filter works by replacing the value of a pixel with the average of those neighboring pixels that are relatively close to its value. This distance is usually taken to be related to the variance of the image, and hence the noise level. The sigma filter has the advantage of preserving high frequency detail in the image while removing noise.
However, the sigma filter has the disadvantage that the filter kernel needs to be relatively large for the filter to be effective. The large filter requires more extensive computing resources and time, thereby making the sigma filter less desirable.
Therefore, it would be desirable to implement a filtering process that realizes the advantages of a sigma filter, which is reducing or eliminating noise while avoiding the problem of blurring the image, but is more economical in the computing requirements needed to implement it.
The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating various embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting, wherein:
For a general understanding, reference is made to the drawings. In the drawings, like references have been used throughout to designate identical or equivalent elements. It is also noted that the drawings may not have been drawn to scale and that certain regions may have been purposely drawn disproportionately so that the features and concepts could be properly illustrated.
In the analysis stage 140, the input image is first sigma filtered in a sigma filtering circuit 108 using the sigma value 106 previously computed in the sigma calculation circuit 104. After the sigma filtering is done, the image is processed by an analysis filter 110.
Typically, this filter is part of a quadrature mirror filter set. This filter might be a filter using a wavelet basis, for example, the Haar wavelet basis. The analysis filter set 110 consists of a low pass or approximation filter and a set of high pass or detail filters, usually three in number.
The output of the analysis filter 110 is four sub images (112, 114A, 114B, and 114C). All four sub images (112, 114A, 114B, and 114C) are at one half the resolution of the input image, that is each subimage is decimated by a factor of two.
The first of the four sub images (112), the output of the low pass or approximation part, is an image where each pixel represents the low frequency content of the image. The other three sub images (114A, 114B, and 114C), the output of the three high pass filter parts, represent the higher frequency detail present in the original image.
Typically, two of these sub images may represent the detail with an emphasis on two orthogonal directions in the original image while the third detailed sub image may represent the detail at some third angle with respect to the first two orthogonal directions.
In prior art implementations, the detailed images have been modified in some way. For example, in prior art implementations, the detail images have been thresholded to remove small details that are typically noise. Alternatively, the detail images may be quantized in some way. These approaches often introduce artifacts into the filtered image.
The details of the artifacts depend on the specific analysis filter used; for example, if a Haar basis is used, variations in the detail image can result in image blockiness, while other methods can cause ringing at edges.
In contrast, as illustrated in
As illustrated in
It is noted that it is more effective to choose the sigma of the sigma filter based upon image statistics for each image. Having an image dependent sigma allows aggressive filtering in images with a lot of noise and light filtering in high quality originals. One effective procedure is to high pass filter the image and to use its standard deviation to set the sigma of the filter. When calculating the standard deviation, large values are ignored, as these are assumed to be the result of image content, not noise.
As previously mentioned, sigma filters are slow because sigma filters typically use a relatively large filter kernel of sizes like 15×15. A large kernel means that the processing needed to implement the sigma filter is relatively large and hence slow. For example, for a 15×15 kernel, at each pixel the computation includes the contributions of 225 nearby pixels to the filter output.
In contrast, the sigma filter, described above, utilize a small relatively kernel wherein even a filter kernel as small as 3×3 is effective in reducing image noise. This reduction in the filter kernel size corresponds to a significant reduction in computing requirements which typically scale roughly as the square of the kernel size. Since only the approximation part of the analyzed image is filtered, a simpler set of coefficients for the analyzer filter can be used. For example, a 2×2 Haar basis consisting of the filter kernels shown in
When only the approximation part of the analyzed image is filtered, all noise that makes its way into the detail sub images will not be filtered from the image. Thus, the sigma filter 106, as illustrated in
An example of a sigma filter to substantially remove all noise associated with the frequency band of the detail sub images before the analysis filter 110 would have a frequency response that has small gain (i.e. large attenuation) when the analysis filter 110 has large gain, since the analysis filter 110 is the filter whose output is the detail sub images.
In general, the sigma filter may be a complementary filter to the analysis filter. If the analysis filter is a quadrature mirror high pass filter, the sigma filter may be a quadrature mirror low pass filter.
As noted above, the sigma filter kernel can be as small as 3×3. This size provides sufficient high frequency rejection and is centered on the pixel of interest. A filter kernel, which meets these requirements and can be implemented by simple shift and add operations, as shown in
The implementation, as shown in
For example, if the original image is at a resolution of 600 lpi and it is desired to filter to a level of about 100 lpi, three stages of filtering would suffice. Three stages would reduce the effective resolution of the approximation image from 600 to 300 to 150 then to 75 lpi as the image passes through the three stages.
With respect to computing efficiency, it is noted that each stage takes only ¼ of the time to perform when compared with the previous stage because of the decimation by two. It is further noted that increasing the number of stages makes the filter equivalent to a much larger single stage sigma filter. It can be shown that the equivalent filter size is given by: 4*2stages−1. This means that for two stages, an effective filter size of 15×15 is realized.
By comparison, if a 15×15 sigma filter is implemented directly, the 15×15 sigma filter would take 25 times as long as a single stage 3×3 filter. Thus, the described system and methodology requires only about 32% more time than a single stage 3×3 filter.
The output 408 (approximation image or approximation part) of the last analysis stage (406) is passed to a synthesis filter 410. The detail sub images D1 (detailed part of the last stage) is passed into the detailed part of the synthesis stage 410, while the approximation part is passed to the approximation part of the synthesis filter in stage 410.
The output of synthesis stage 410 can be optionally sigma filtered in by a sigma filter 412. The synthesis process may continue in another synthesis stage 414 wherein the output of synthesis stage 410 is combined with the detailed sub images D0 from the analysis filter stage 402. The output of synthesis stage 410 can be optionally sigma filtered in by a sigma filter 416 producing the final filtered image 418.
It is noted that the analysis process of
Finally, the process may be implemented in software. Accordingly, as shown in
The image is sigma filtered at step 506. The sigma filtering uses a relatively small filter kernel, typically 3×3. After the sigma filtering, the filtered image is processed by an analysis filter, at step 508. The output of the analysis filter is four subimages—one approximation part and three detail part. All the subimages are decimated by 2, the subimages are ½ the resolution of the input image. It is noted that when combined, the subimages contain all of the information in the original image, but distributed between the four sub images.
Processing continues with a sigma filter applied to the approximation part of the output at step 508. The detail parts that are output from the processing at step 508 are left untouched at this stage. At step 510, the approximation part is again sigma filtered. At step block 512, the sigma filtered approximation part and the three detail parts are recombined in a synthesis filter.
The synthesis filter kernel is the quatrature mirror pair of the analysis filter kernels at step 508. Afterwards, the output of the synthesis, at step 512, may be optionally sigma filtered one more time at step 514.
It is possible to extend the processing in
A method for improving the quality of a digital image by obtaining a digital image; sigma filtering the image to produce a filtered input image; analysis processing the sigma filtered input image to produce an approximation part and a detail part; sigma filtering the approximation part to produce a filtered approximation part; and synthesizing the filtered approximation part and the detail part to generate a reconstructed filtered image. The synthesizing of the filtered approximation part and the detail part may include analysis processing the filtered approximation part to produce a second approximation part and a second detail part; sigma filtering the second approximation part to produce a second filtered approximation part; synthesizing the second filtered approximation part and the second detailed part to produce a first reconstructed image; and synthesizing the first reconstructed image and the first detail part to produce a final filtered image. It is noted that the first reconstructed image may be sigma filtered prior to synthesizing the first reconstructed image and the first detail part to produce a final filtered image.
A sigma value for the sigma filtering for each image can be determined. The determining of the sigma value high pass filters the image; determines a standard deviation of the high pass filtered image; and uses the determined standard deviation as the sigma value wherein the determined standard deviation is used as the sigma value when the determined standard deviation is less than a predetermined value.
A system for improving the quality of a digital image may include a first sigma filtering circuit to sigma filter an image to produce a filtered image; an analysis circuit to process the sigma filtered image to produce an approximation part and a detail part; a second sigma filter circuit to filter the approximation part to produce a sigma filtered approximation part; and a synthesizer to combine the sigma filtered approximation part and the detail part to generate a reconstructed filtered image.
The system may further include a sigma circuit, operatively connected to said first and second sigma filter circuits, to determine a sigma value from the image. The sigma circuit may include a high pass filter circuit to high pass filter the image and a circuit to determine a standard deviation of the high pass filtered image, the determined standard deviation being the sigma value wherein the determined standard deviation is used as the sigma value when the determined standard deviation is less than a predetermined value.
It is noted that the filter circuit and the synthesizer may form a quadrature mirror pair.
Another system for improving the quality of a digital image may include a first sigma filtering circuit to sigma filter an image to produce a filtered image; a first analysis circuit to process the sigma filtered image to produce an approximation part and a detail part; a second sigma filter circuit to filter the approximation part to produce a sigma filtered approximation part; a second analysis circuit to process the sigma filtered approximation part to produce a second approximation part and a second detail part; a third sigma filter circuit to sigma filter the second approximation part to produce a sigma filtered second approximation part; a first synthesizer to synthesize the sigma filtered second approximation part and the second detailed part to produce a first reconstructed image; and a second synthesizer to synthesize the first reconstructed image and the first detail part to produce a final filtered image.
It is noted that the first filter circuit and the first synthesizer may form a quadrature mirror pair, and the second filter circuit and the second synthesizer may form a quadrature mirror pair.
A sigma circuit may be used to determine a sigma value from the image. The sigma circuit may include a high pass filter circuit to high pass filter the image; and a circuit to determine a standard deviation of the high pass filtered image, the determined standard deviation being the sigma value wherein the determined standard deviation is used as the sigma value when the determined standard deviation is less than a predetermined value.
A fourth sigma filter to sigma filter the first reconstructed image to produce a filtered first reconstructed image may be included wherein the second synthesizer synthesizes the filtered first reconstructed image and the first detail part to produce a final filtered image.
It will be appreciated that various of the above-disclosed and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems or applications. Also that various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements therein may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art which are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8737758, | Sep 07 2010 | Samsung Electro-Mechanics Co., Ltd. | Apparatus and method of reducing noise |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4573070, | Jan 31 1977 | Technology Licensing Corporation | Noise reduction system for video signals |
5001429, | Nov 21 1989 | SUNNYBROOK HEALTH SCIENCE CENTRE A BODY CORPORATE OF THE PROVINCE OF ONTARIO | Removal of truncation artifacts in NMR imaging |
5010405, | Feb 02 1989 | Massachusetts Institute of Technology | Receiver-compatible enhanced definition television system |
5343309, | Aug 12 1992 | Xerox Corporation | Image processing system and method employing adaptive filtering to provide improved reconstruction of continuous tone images from halftone images including those without a screen structure |
5745063, | May 05 1994 | Landis+Gyr AG | Arrangement for the summation of products of signals |
5923775, | Apr 04 1996 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Apparatus and method for signal dependent noise estimation and reduction in digital images |
6181829, | Jan 21 1998 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for classifying and processing of pixels of image data |
6205257, | Dec 31 1996 | Xerox Corporation | System and method for selectively noise-filtering digital images |
6373992, | Feb 27 1998 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Method and apparatus for image processing |
6549658, | Jan 21 1998 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for classifying and processing of pixels of image data |
6628842, | Jun 22 1999 | FUJIFILM Corporation | Image processing method and apparatus |
6633683, | Jun 26 2000 | GRASS VALLEY CANADA | Apparatus and method for adaptively reducing noise in a noisy input image signal |
6721448, | Feb 20 2001 | GOOGLE LLC | Color clustering and segmentation using sigma filtering |
6760482, | Feb 19 1999 | Unisearch Limited | Method for visual optimisation of embedded block codes to exploit visual masking phenomena |
6847737, | Mar 13 1998 | IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC ; Iowa State University | Methods for performing DAF data filtering and padding |
6864994, | Jan 19 2000 | Xerox Corporation | High-speed, high-quality descreening system and method |
6907144, | Oct 06 1999 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Noise reduction method, apparatus, and program for digital image processing |
6947178, | Feb 26 2001 | Ricoh Company, LTD | De-screening halftones using sigma filters |
6947597, | Sep 28 2001 | Xerox Corporation | Soft picture/graphics classification system and method |
7139437, | Nov 12 2002 | Monument Peak Ventures, LLC | Method and system for removing artifacts in compressed images |
7437013, | Dec 23 2003 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Directional spatial video noise reduction |
7570831, | Apr 29 2004 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | System and method for estimating image noise |
7755802, | Aug 24 2007 | Eastman Kodak Company | Toner-based noise reduction in electrostatography |
8055093, | Apr 11 2008 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for noise level detection in image data |
8090215, | Apr 11 2008 | Xerox Corporation | Method and system for noise level detection in image data |
20020114512, | |||
20020154339, | |||
20030053708, | |||
20030086105, | |||
20040091168, | |||
20050041883, | |||
20050094889, | |||
20050244075, | |||
20050281458, | |||
20060018537, | |||
20070172118, | |||
20070172119, | |||
20070223834, | |||
20090214131, | |||
20090257673, | |||
20090257674, | |||
20090257675, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Feb 27 2008 | Xerox Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | ||||
Feb 27 2008 | SCHWEID, STUART A | Xerox Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 020570 | 0080 | |
Nov 07 2022 | Xerox Corporation | CITIBANK, N A , AS AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 062740 | 0214 | |
May 17 2023 | CITIBANK, N A , AS AGENT | Xerox Corporation | RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS AT R F 062740 0214 | 063694 | 0122 | |
Jun 21 2023 | Xerox Corporation | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 064760 | 0389 | |
Nov 17 2023 | Xerox Corporation | JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 065628 | 0019 | |
Feb 06 2024 | Xerox Corporation | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 066741 | 0001 | |
Feb 06 2024 | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Xerox Corporation | TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT RF 064760 0389 | 068261 | 0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Apr 20 2012 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Oct 23 2015 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 31 2019 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Jan 01 2024 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Jun 17 2024 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 15 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 15 2015 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 15 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 15 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 15 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 15 2019 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 15 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 15 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 15 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 15 2023 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 15 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 15 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |