Methods and systems for determining reliability of Global Positioning system (gps) ground speed. An example system receives gps track information and gps ground speed, determines a change in gps track information and determines reliability of the gps ground speed based on the determined change in gps track information relative to the gps ground speed. The system sets a gps ground speed based on the determined reliability. A gps ground speed output is set to zero, if the gps ground speed is determined unreliable and the gps ground speed output is set to the gps ground speed, if the gps ground speed is determined reliable. The system sends the gps ground speed output to a Runway Awareness and Advisory system (RAAS). Also, the system sets the gps ground speed output to zero, if a received gps ground speed validity signal or a received gps track validity signal indicate invalid.
|
1. A method for determining reliability of Global Positioning system (gps) ground speed, the method comprising:
at a processing device,
receiving gps track information and gps ground speed;
determining a change in gps track information over a predefined time delay;
determining reliability of the gps ground speed based on the determined change in gps track information relative to the gps ground speed,
wherein the gps ground speed is determined reliable if the change in gps track information does not differ by more than a threshold amount, wherein the threshold amount is based on the gps ground speed;
setting a gps ground speed based on the determined reliability; and
setting the gps ground speed output to zero, if the gps ground speed is determined unreliable.
7. A system for determining reliability of Global Positioning system (gps) ground speed, the system comprising:
a first means for receiving gps track information and gps ground speed;
a second means for determining a change in gps track information over a predefined time delay;
a third means for determining reliability of the gps ground speed based on the determined change in gps track information relative to the gps ground speed,
wherein the gps ground speed is determined reliable if the change in gps track information does not differ by more than a threshold amount, wherein the threshold amount is based on the gps ground speed; and
a fourth means for setting a gps ground speed based on the determined reliability, the fourth means sets the gps ground speed output to zero, if the gps ground speed is determined unreliable.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
receiving at least one of a gps ground speed validity signal and a gps track validity signal; and
setting the gps ground speed output to zero, if at least one of the gps ground speed validity signal or the gps track validity signal indicates invalid.
6. The method of
8. The system of
9. The system of
10. The system of
a fifth means for receiving at least one of a gps ground speed validity signal and a gps track validity signal,
wherein the fourth means sets the gps ground speed output to zero, if one of the gps ground speed validity signal or the gps track validity signal indicates invalid.
11. The system of
12. The system of
13. The system of
|
A Runway Awareness and Advisory System (RAAS) locates aircraft with respect to airport runways and taxiways and generates and annunciates conflict awareness advisories as a function of determining that a conflict exists. One type of conflict awareness advisories is an “On Taxiway” advisory that is produced if the aircraft exceeds a speed threshold while still on a taxiway. If the speed threshold is exceeded, the RAAS assumes the pilot is trying to take-off from the taxiway.
Currently, false “On Taxiway” advisories may be produced because of erroneous Global Positioning System (GPS) ground speed data provided by some GPS devices. When the aircraft is not moving, some GPS receivers output erroneous ground speed. If this erroneous ground speed exceeds the speed threshold, a false advisory, such as RAAS “On Taxiway”, is produced.
Therefore, there exists a need for reducing false “On Taxiway” advisories.
The present invention provides methods and systems for determining reliability of Global Positioning System (GPS) ground speed. An example system receives GPS track information and GPS ground speed, determines a change in GPS track information and determines reliability of the GPS ground speed based on the determined change in GPS track information relative to the GPS ground speed.
The system sets a GPS ground speed based on the determined reliability. A GPS ground speed output is set to zero, if the GPS ground speed is determined unreliable. The GPS ground speed output is set to the GPS ground speed, if the GPS ground speed is determined reliable.
In one aspect of the invention, the system sends the GPS ground speed output to a Runway Awareness and Advisory System (RAAS).
In another aspect of the invention, the system sets the GPS ground speed output to zero, if a received GPS ground speed validity signal or a received GPS track validity signal indicate invalid.
The preferred and alternative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following drawings:
The processor 24 receives track and ground speed information from the GPS 26 and determines if the GPS ground speed is reasonable. If the processor 24 determines that the aircraft is on the ground according to information received from any of the other aircraft systems 32, such as a weight on wheels switch, a ground speed value outputted to the RAAS 30 or other systems, such as an Enhanced Ground Proximity Warning System, is set to 0, if it was determined that the GPS ground speed was invalid or unacceptable. Information retrieved from the other aircraft systems 32 may be supplied via a direct connection to the processor 24 or via a data bus, such as an ARINC 429 bus.
The functions performed by the processor 24 may be included in various components of the system 20 such as the RAAS 30 or a Terrain Awareness and Warning System. For example, the RAAS 30 may be modified to incorporate the functionality provided as described above as long as the RAAS 30 is in data communication with the GPS 26 and the other aircraft systems 32.
Next, at a decision block 108, the processor 24 determines if the comparison performed at block 106 indicates that the GPS ground speed is unreliable. If the GPS ground speed is determined to be reliable, then at a block 110, the GPS ground speed data is outputted to the RAAS 30. If the comparison performed at block 106 indicates that the GPS ground speed is unreliable, then at block 114, the ground speed value is set to 0 and outputted to the RAAS 30. Next, at a decision block 116, the processor 24 determines if a reset delay period has expired after the setting of the ground speed to 0. If the delay period has not expired, the delay process waits until it has. Once the delay period has expired, the process 100 returns to the decision block 102 to repeat.
In one embodiment, the processor 24 compares a compass heading received form other aircraft sensors to GPS track information. The processor 24 determines the GPS ground speed is unreliable if the comparison shows that the heading and GPS track information differ by more than a threshold amount, for example 10 degrees.
In one example, at 0 ground speed, the acceptable change in GPS track is less than or equal to 30°. The change in the acceptable limit of GPS track drops to 25° once the GPS ground speed reaches 40 knots.
While the preferred embodiment of the invention has been illustrated and described, as noted above, many changes can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, the functions performed in
Ishihara, Yasuo, Conner, Kevin J, Johnson, Steve C.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
11941995, | Sep 01 2021 | Honeywell International Inc. | Runway awareness and alerting systems and methods |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5745054, | Nov 18 1996 | Honeywell Inc.; Honeywell INC | Method and apparatus for conformal runway alignment on a head up display |
6005513, | Jun 03 1996 | MCDONNELL DOUGLAS HELICOPTER CO | Portable flight guidance and tracking system |
6388613, | Mar 30 1999 | MORITA DIGITAL LLC | Portable GPS type distance/speed meter capable of selectively using doppler speed measuring method |
6654685, | Jan 04 2002 | The Boeing Company | Apparatus and method for navigation of an aircraft |
6785594, | Mar 25 1999 | Honeywell International Inc.; Honeywell International, Inc | Ground proximity warning system and method having a reduced set of input parameters |
6865453, | Mar 26 2003 | Garmin Ltd. | GPS navigation device |
6898492, | Mar 15 2000 | MICROLOGIC SYSTEMS INC | Self-contained flight data recorder with wireless data retrieval |
6983206, | Mar 06 2001 | Honeywell International, Inc | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
7079951, | May 15 2002 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
7206698, | Dec 10 2004 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
7363145, | Dec 10 2004 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
7565260, | Oct 12 2004 | INTELLECTUAL DISCOVERY CO , LTD | Apparatus and method for setting a gyroscope zero point |
7587278, | May 15 2002 | Honeywell International, Inc | Ground operations and advanced runway awareness and advisory system |
7702461, | Dec 10 2004 | Honeywell International Inc. | Ground operations and imminent landing runway selection |
20030193411, | |||
20050128129, | |||
20060161336, | |||
20070299608, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jun 15 2006 | ISHIHARA, YASURO | Honeywell International Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017852 | /0422 | |
Jun 15 2006 | JOHNSON, STEVE C | Honeywell International Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017852 | /0422 | |
Jun 26 2006 | Honeywell International Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Jun 26 2006 | CONNER, KEVIN J | Honeywell International Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 017852 | /0422 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Feb 23 2016 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 06 2020 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 12 2024 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Sep 18 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Mar 18 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 18 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Sep 18 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Sep 18 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Mar 18 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 18 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Sep 18 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Sep 18 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Mar 18 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Sep 18 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Sep 18 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |