A gasket is made of an injection molded resin integral with a cylindrical boss portion having a through hole in which a current collector is inserted, a rim portion for sealing an opening of a battery case, and a connecting portion for connecting the boss portion and the rim portion, wherein the boss portion has an annular injection portion at an end face thereof, which is a trace of an injection molding gate, a ratio (S1/S2) between an axial cross-sectional area (S1) of the boss portion and an axial cross-sectional area (S2) of the injection portion is in the range of 10 to 25, and an outer diameter of the boss portion is in the range of 3.0 to 4.2 mm.
|
1. A battery gasket for sealing an opening of a battery case of a cylindrical alkaline battery, the battery gasket comprising:
an injection-molded resin integral with a cylindrical boss portion having a through hole in which a current collector is inserted,
a rim portion for sealing the opening of the battery case, and
a connecting portion for connecting the boss portion and the rim portion, wherein
the boss portion has an annular injection portion at an end face thereof, which is a trace of an injection molding gate,
a ratio (S1/S2) between an axial cross-sectional area (S1) of the boss portion and an axial cross-sectional area (S2) of the injection portion is in the range of 10 to 25, and
an outer diameter of the boss portion is in the range of 3.0 to 4.2 mm.
2. The battery gasket of
the outer diameter of the boss portion is in the range of 3.0 to 3.4 mm.
3. The battery gasket of
the resin forming the gasket contains 5 to 40 wt % of a recycled resin which has been removed from the injection-molded resin.
4. The battery gasket of
5 to 15 wt % of an inorganic filler is added to the resin forming the gasket.
6. The battery gasket of
the gasket is formed by injecting a resin into an injection mold through a gate arranged in the injection mold to correspond to an inner perimeter of the end face of the boss portion.
7. An alkaline battery, an opening of a battery case of which is sealed with the battery gasket of
the injection portion at the end face of the boss portion of the gasket faces a battery component contained in the battery case.
8. The alkaline battery of
the alkaline battery is an AA alkaline battery or an AAA alkaline battery.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This application claims priority to Japanese Patent Application No. 2009-079735 filed on Mar. 27, 2009, the disclosure of which including the specification, the drawings, and the claims is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
The present disclosure relates generally to a battery gasket for sealing an opening of a battery case, and an alkaline battery using the same.
A cylindrical alkaline battery is configured by placing battery components in a battery case, and sealing an opening of the battery case with a gasket.
In general, a gasket includes a cylindrical boss portion having a through hole in which a current collector is inserted, a rim portion for sealing an opening of a battery case, and a connecting portion for connecting the boss portion and the rim portion. The gasket thus configured is integrally injection molded by injecting a molten resin into an injection mold.
In injection molding the gasket, a gate through which the molten resin is injected in the injection mold may be arranged at various positions of the injection mold. For example, when the gasket includes a thin portion formed in the connecting portion to function as a safety vent for preventing the explosion of the battery, the gate is preferably arranged in the injection mold to correspond to an end face of the boss portion of the gasket so that the molten resin can smoothly flow into the injection mold (see, e.g., Published Unexamined Japanese Patent Applications Nos. 2005-093204, 2004-134168, and H08-167405).
In arranging the gate for injecting the molten resin to correspond to the end face of the boss portion of the gasket, it is reasonable to arrange the gate in the injection mold to correspond to an end face of the boss portion facing a gelled negative electrode for easy manufacture and maintenance of the injection mold.
However, when the gasket is injection molded, the boss portion near the gate may easily crack due to residual stress of the injection molding. If part of the boss portion facing the gelled negative electrode (facing the inside of the battery) cracks, the gasket is hydrolyzed by an alkaline electrolyte contained in the gelled negative electrode, and tends to degrade over time. As a result, the electrolyte may leak through the crack in the gasket during long-term storage of the battery.
In order to solve the foregoing problem, the present disclosure advantageously provides a leak-proof battery gasket capable of preventing leakage of the electrolyte during long-term storage of the battery.
This summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the Detailed Description. It is not intended to identify key features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended to be used as an aid in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The invention disclosed and claimed herein, in one aspect thereof, provides a battery gasket in which the ratio (S1/S2) between an axial cross-sectional area (S1) of a boss portion of the gasket and an axial cross-sectional area (S2) of an annular injection portion, which is a trace of an injection molding gate arranged in an injection mold to correspond to an end face of the boss portion, is in the range of 10 to 25.
According to one example implementation of the invention, the battery gasket seals an opening of a battery case of a cylindrical alkaline battery. The battery gasket is made of: an injection-molded resin integral with a cylindrical boss portion having a through hole in which a current collector is inserted, a rim portion for sealing the opening of the battery case, and a connecting portion for connecting the boss portion and the rim portion, wherein the boss portion has an annular injection portion at an end face thereof, which is a trace of an injection molding gate, a ratio (S1/S2) between an axial cross-sectional area (S1) of the boss portion and an axial cross-sectional area (S2) of the injection portion is in the range of 10 to 25, and an outer diameter of the boss portion is in the range of 3.0 to 4.2 mm, preferably 3.0 to 3.4 mm.
The gasket thus configured can prevent cracking of the boss portion of the gasket near the gate, and can prevent leakage of an electrolyte from an alkaline battery using the gasket during long-term storage of the alkaline battery. This can provide the alkaline battery with good leakage resistance.
According to one example implementation of the invention, the resin forming the gasket contains 5 to 40 wt % of a recycled resin which has been removed from the injection-molded resin. Further, 5 to 15 wt % of an inorganic filler is added to the resin forming the gasket, and the inorganic filler is preferably talc or kaoline.
According to one example implementation of the invention, the gasket is formed by injecting a resin into an injection mold through a gate arranged in the injection mold to correspond to an inner perimeter of the end face of the boss portion.
The invention disclosed and claimed herein, in one aspect thereof, provides an alkaline battery, an opening of a battery case of which is sealed with the above-described battery gasket, wherein the injection portion at the end face of the boss portion of the gasket faces a battery component contained in the battery case.
The disclosed gasket can prevent cracking of the boss portion of the gasket near the gate. This structure can prevent leakage of an electrolyte from an alkaline battery using the gasket during long-term storage of the alkaline battery, and can provide the alkaline battery with good leakage resistance.
Hereinafter, an embodiment of the invention is described in detail with reference to the drawings. However, the invention is not limited to the following embodiment. The embodiment can be modified without deviating from the effective scope of the invention, and can be combined with other embodiments.
As shown in
The gasket 5 is formed by injecting a molten resin into the cavities 14, 16 and 17 of the injection mold through the gate 12 arranged in the injection mold to correspond to an inner perimeter of an end face of the boss portion.
An effective means of increasing the capacity of the alkaline battery is to reduce the diameter of the current collector 6 to increase the amount of the negative electrode filled in the battery case 1. This is also effective for cost reduction.
The inventors of the present invention have discovered the following problem in the course of various studies on a battery including the current collector 6 of reduced diameter.
Reducing the diameter of the current collector 6 involves reducing the diameter of the core pin 13 in the injection mold shown in
Using the gasket 5 formed with the injection mold, alkaline batteries as shown in
The inventors of the present invention examined the cause of the electrolyte leakage, and found the following fact.
The molten resin 30 injected through the gate 12 (the injection portion 24) fills the cavity 14 as shown in
The gasket 5 shown in
The inventors of the present invention made the following study to examine the relationship between a distance between the interface starting point A and the end face of the boss portion 20 having the injection portion 24 (hereinafter referred to as “a height of the interface starting point (H)”) and the flow of the molten resin.
Specifically, gaskets (examples 1 to 5) were formed with an inner diameter R1 and an outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 fixed to 1.1 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively, and an outer diameter L of the injection portion 24 varied in the range of 1.60 to 1.21 mm, as shown in
TABLE 1
Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 3
Ex. 4
Ex. 5
Outer diameter of
1.60
1.41
1.30
1.24
1.21
injection portion [L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss
1.10
portion [R1] (mm)
Outer diameter of boss
3.00
portion [R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of
6.12
boss portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of
1.06
0.61
0.38
0.25
0.20
injection portion [S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
5.77
10.01
16.23
24.71
30.66
Height of interface
0.22
0.51
0.73
0.83
0.88
starting point [H] (mm)
Table 1 shows the measurement results. As shown in Table 1, the height of the interface starting point (H) decreases as the outer diameter L of the injection portion 24 increases. This indicates that the resin flows backward due to the increase in flow of the molten resin, and consequently, the interface starting point A approaches the end face of the boss portion 20.
Values S1 and S2 are calculated by the following equations.
S1=π/4(R22−R12)
S2=π/4(L2−R12)
The inventors of the present invention also examined the relationship between the S1/S2 value of the gasket and the leakage resistance of the alkaline battery using the gasket.
First, the gasket formed was visually checked. Specifically, the gaskets of examples 1 to 5, 50 pieces each, were prepared, and each of them was cut half in the direction of insertion of the current collector to microscopically inspect the outer surface of the boss portion 20 and the surface of the through hole 25, and the number of gaskets that produced a weld line was count. In addition, the surface of the rim portion 22 was also microscopically inspected, and the number of gaskets that produced a sink mark and a weld line was count.
Then, AA alkaline batteries were fabricated using the gaskets thus formed, and two leakage resistance tests, i.e., a high-temperature high-humidity test and a storage test, were performed. For the high-temperature high-humidity test, 20 batteries of each of the examples were stored in a test chamber at a temperature of 60° C. and a humidity of 90%, and the number of batteries that experienced the leakage was count every month (1 M). For the storage test, 110 batteries of each of the examples were stored in a test chamber at a temperature of 45° C., and the number of batteries that experienced the leakage was count after 3 months (3 M). Then, ten of the 110 batteries were disassembled, and the number of batteries in which a crack was found in the boss portion 20 near the gate 12 was count. The remaining 100 batteries were stored in the test chamber of 45° C. for 3 months, and the number of batteries that experienced the leakage was count after 6 months (6 M). Then, ten of the 100 batteries were disassembled, and the number of batteries in which a crack was found in the boss portion 20 near the gate 12 was count.
Table 2 shows the results of the above-described evaluation on the gaskets (example 1 to 5) having the S1/S2 value in the range of 5.77 to 30.66, and alkaline batteries using the gaskets.
TABLE 2
Ex. 1
Ex. 2
Ex. 3
Ex. 4
Ex. 5
S1/S2
5.77
10.01
16.23
24.71
30.66
Weld line generated in
5/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
boss portion
Sink mark generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
20/50
rim portion
Weld line generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
8/50
rim portion
Leakage
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
(60° C., 90%, 1 M)
Leakage
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
1/20
(60° C., 90%, 2 M)
Leakage
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
3/20
(60° C., 90%, 3 M)
Leakage
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
(45° C., 3 M)
Crack generated near
7/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
gate (45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
12/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
3/100
Crack generated near
10/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
10/10
gate (45° C., 6 M)
As shown in Table 2, the weld line was found in the boss portion 20 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (example 1) having the S1/S2 value of 5.77. In the storage test at 45° C. for 3 months, the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of example 1 did not experience the electrolyte leakage. However, the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in seven of the ten disassembled batteries. In the storage test at 45° C. for 6 months, the electrolyte leaked from some of the alkaline batteries, and the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in every ten disassembled batteries.
The sink mark and the weld line were found in the rim portion 22 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (example 5) having the S1/S2 value of 30.66. In the high-temperature high-humidity test (60° C., 90%, 2 M, 3 M), some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of example 5 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
In contrast, both the weld line and the sink mark were not found in the boss portion 20 and the rim portion 22 by the visual check in the gaskets (examples 2 to 4) having the S1/S2 value of 10.01 to 24.71. In the high-temperature high-humidity test and the storage test for testing the leakage resistance, none of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 2 to 4 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
From the above-described results, the S1/S2 value smaller than 10 increases the flow of the injected molten resin, and the resin flows backward. This disturbs the flow of the resin near the inner circumferential surface of the boss portion 20, thereby bringing the interface starting point A close to the end face of the boss portion 20. This may lead to generation of the weld line, and easy cracking of the gasket near the end face of the boss portion 20. If the crack is generated near an end face of the boss portion 20 facing the gelled negative electrode, the electrolyte may leak through the crack in the boss portion 20.
When the S1/S2 value exceeds 25, the flow of the injected molten resin is reduced too much, and the resin takes long time to fill the cavity for forming the rim portion 22, which is an end portion of the gasket. Therefore, the sink mark and the weld line are likely to generate in the rim portion 22. As a result, in sealing the battery case by crimping the rim portion 22, adhesion between the rim portion 22 and the battery case may deteriorate, and the electrolyte may leak through a gap between the gasket and the battery case.
For these reasons, setting the S1/S2 ratio in the range of 10 to 25 is preferable for preventing the leakage of the electrolyte during long-term storage of the alkaline battery.
For verification of the preferable range, the gaskets (examples 1 to 5) shown in Table 1 were replaced with gaskets (examples 6 to 10) in which the inner diameter R1 of the boss portion 20 was unchanged, and the outer diameter R2 increased from 3.0 mm to 4.2 mm, and the same evaluation as shown in Table 2 was performed. To keep the S1/S2 value in the range of 8.09 to 29.4, the outer diameter L of the injection portion 24 was varied.
Table 3 shows the evaluation results. As shown in Table 3, the weld line was found in the boss portion 20 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (example 6) having the S1/S2 value of 8.09. In the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of example 6 experienced the electrolyte leakage, and the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in the batteries that experienced the leakage.
TABLE 3
Ex. 6
Ex. 7
Ex. 8
Ex. 9
Ex. 10
Outer diameter of injection
1.80
1.69
1.50
1.37
1.33
portion [L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss
1.10
portion [R1] (mm)
Outer diameter of boss
4.20
portion [R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss
12.90
portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of
1.59
1.29
0.82
0.52
0.44
injection portion
[S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
8.09
9.98
15.80
24.64
29.40
Weld line generated in
6/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
boss portion
Sink mark generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
18/50
rim portion
Weld line generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
6/50
rim portion
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
1/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
4/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate
6/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
9/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
2/100
Crack generated near gate
10/10
3/10
2/10
2/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
The sink mark and the weld line were both found in the rim portion 22 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (example 10) having the S1/S2 value of 29.4. In the high-temperature high-humidity test (60° C., 90%, 2 M, 3 M) and the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of example 10 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
In contrast, the weld line and the sink mark were not found in both of the boss portion 20 and the rim portion 22 by the visual check in the gaskets (examples 7 to 9) having the S1/S2 value of 9.98 to 24.64. In the high-temperature high-humidity test and the storage test for testing the leakage resistance, none of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 7 to 9 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
The above-described results verify that the S1/S2 value in the range of 10 to 25 is preferable for preventing the electrolyte leakage during long-term storage of the alkaline battery.
For checking the relationship between the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 and the leakage resistance of the battery, the following evaluation was performed. Specifically, two types of gaskets were prepared in which the outer diameters R2 of the boss portions 20 was 2.8 mm and 4.5 mm, respectively, and they were evaluated in the same manner as indicated in Table 2.
As shown in Table 4, the weld line was found in the boss portion 20 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (examples 11 and 12), in each of which the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 was 2.8 mm. In the high-temperature high-humidity test (60° C., 90%, 2 M, 3 M) and the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 11 and 12 experienced the electrolyte leakage, and the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in the batteries that experienced the leakage.
TABLE 4
Ex. 11
Ex. 12
Ex. 13
Ex. 14
Outer diameter of injection
1.33
1.23
1.75
1.41
portion [L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss portion
1.10
[R1] (mm)
Outer diameter of boss portion
2.80
4.50
[R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss
5.21
14.95
portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection
0.44
0.24
1.45
0.61
portion [S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
11.86
21.89
10.28
24.47
Weld line generated in boss portion
3/50
5/50
2/50
0/50
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
10/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
3/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
1/20
0/20
0/20
2/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
4/20
0/20
3/20
6/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate
4/10
6/10
3/10
0/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
5/100
7/100
4/100
2/100
Crack generated near gate
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
The sink mark and the weld line were both found in the rim portion 22 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (examples 13 and 14), in each of which the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 was 4.5 mm. In the high-temperature high-humidity test (60° C., 90%, 2 M, 3 M) and the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 13 and 14 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
The above-described results indicate that the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 smaller than 3.0 mm reduces the thickness of the boss portion relative to the flow of the molten resin. Therefore, the resin flows backward, and the weld line is likely to generate in the boss portion 20, even when the S1/S2 value is in the range of 10 to 25. On the other hand, the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 larger than 4.2 mm increases the thickness of the boss portion relative to the flow of the molten resin, and the resin takes long time to fill the cavity for forming the rim portion 22, which is an end portion of the gasket. Therefore, the sink mark and the weld line are likely to generate in the rim portion 22. As a result, the boss portion 20 may crack, and the adhesion between the rim portion 22 and the battery case may deteriorate, resulting in the leakage of the electrolyte.
The foregoing studies indicate that it is preferable for prevention of the electrolyte leakage during the long-term storage of the alkaline battery to set the ratio (S1/S2) between the axial cross-sectional area (S1) of the boss portion and the axial cross-sectional area (S2) of the injection portion 24 in the range of 10 to 25, and to set the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 in the range of 3.0 to 4.2 mm.
The ratio and the outer diameter thus controlled make it possible to prevent cracking of the boss portion 20 of the gasket 5 near the gate 12, and to allow the alkaline battery using the gasket 5 to exhibit good leakage resistance during the long-term storage.
As shown in Table 3, the alkaline batteries of examples 7 to 9, in which the boss portion 20 had a 4.2 mm outer diameter R2, did not experience the electrolyte leakage in the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance. However, the crack was found in the gasket near the gate in some of the alkaline batteries. Therefore, for prolonged storage, giving higher leakage resistance to the batteries is preferable.
Looking for batteries free from the electrolyte leakage during prolonged storage, alkaline batteries using gaskets (examples 15 to 17) were prepared, in each of which the boss portion 20 had a 3.4 mm outer diameter R2, and they were evaluated in the same manner as indicated in Table 2. The outer diameter L of the injection portion 24 was varied to keep the S1/S2 value in the range of 8.95 to 24.16.
Table 5 shows the evaluation results. In the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, the crack was not found in the gasket near the gate 12 in every alkaline battery (examples 15 to 17) as shown in Table 5.
TABLE 5
Ex. 15
Ex. 16
Ex. 17
Outer diameter of injection portion [L] (mm)
1.50
1.35
1.28
Inner diameter of boss portion [R1] (mm)
1.10
Outer diameter of boss portion [R2] (mm)
3.40
Cross-sectional area of boss portion
8.13
[S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection portion
0.82
0.48
0.34
[S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
9.95
16.90
24.16
Weld line generated in boss portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate (45° C., 3 M)
0/10
0/10
0/10
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
0/100
0/100
0/100
Crack generated near gate (45° C., 6 M)
0/10
0/10
0/10
For preventing the electrolyte leakage from the alkaline battery during the prolonged storage, the ratio (S1/S2) between the axial cross-sectional area (S1) of the boss portion 20 and the axial cross-sectional area (S2) of the injection portion 24 is preferably set in the range of 10 to 25, and the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 is preferably set in the range of 3.0 to 3.4 mm.
Next, the evaluation performed on the AA alkaline batteries was performed on AAA alkaline batteries using the gaskets indicated in Tables 1 to 5.
TABLE 6
Ex. 18
Ex. 19
Ex. 20
Ex. 21
Ex. 22
Outer diameter of injection
1.60
1.41
1.30
1.24
1.21
portion [L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss
1.10
portion [R1] (mm)
Outer diameter of boss
3.00
portion [R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss
6.12
portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of
1.06
0.61
0.38
0.25
0.20
injection portion
[S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
5.77
10.01
16.23
24.71
30.66
Weld line generated in
22/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
boss portion
Sink mark generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
25/50
rim portion
Weld line generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
6/50
rim portion
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
2/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
4/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate
8/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
13/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
4/100
Crack generated near gate
10/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
Table 6 shows the results of the evaluation on the alkaline batteries in which the boss portion 20 had a 3.0 mm outer diameter R2. As shown in Table 6, the AAA alkaline batteries showed almost the same results as those of the AA alkaline batteries (see Tables 1 and 2).
TABLE 7
Ex. 23
Ex. 24
Ex. 25
Ex. 26
Ex. 27
Outer diameter of injection
1.80
1.69
1.50
1.37
1.33
portion [L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss
1.10
portion [R1] (mm)
Outer diameter of boss
4.20
portion [R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss
12.90
portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of
1.59
1.29
0.82
0.52
0.44
injection portion [S2]
(mm2)
S1/S2
8.09
9.98
15.80
24.64
29.40
Weld line generated in
18/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
boss portion
Sink mark generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
23/50
rim portion
Weld line generated in
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
7/50
rim portion
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
5/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
2/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
12/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
8/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate
7/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
0/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
12/100
0/100
0/100
0/100
4/100
Crack generated near gate
10/10
3/10
2/10
2/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
Table 7 shows the results of the evaluation on the alkaline batteries in which the boss portion 20 had a 4.2 mm outer diameter R2. As shown in Table 7, the AAA alkaline batteries showed almost the same results as those of the AA alkaline batteries (see Table 3).
TABLE 8
Ex. 28
Ex. 29
Ex. 30
Ex. 31
Outer diameter of injection
1.33
1.23
1.75
1.41
portion [L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss
1.10
portion [R1] (mm)
Outer diameter of boss portion
2.80
4.50
[R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss
5.21
14.95
portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection
0.44
0.24
1.45
0.61
portion [S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
11.86
21.89
10.28
24.47
Weld line generated in boss portion
9/50
11/50
5/50
0/50
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
18/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
8/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
1/20
0/20
1/20
3/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
4/20
0/20
4/20
8/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate
5/10
8/10
5/10
0/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
12/100
12/100
10/100
2/100
Crack generated near gate
10/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
Table 8 shows the results of the evaluation on the alkaline batteries in which the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 was 2.8 mm and 4.5 mm. As shown in Table 8, the AAA alkaline batteries showed almost the same results as those of the AA alkaline batteries (see Table 4).
TABLE 9
Ex. 32
Ex. 33
Ex. 34
Outer diameter of injection portion [L] (mm)
1.50
1.53
1.28
Inner diameter of boss portion [R1] (mm)
1.10
Outer diameter of boss portion [R2] (mm)
3.40
Cross-sectional area of boss portion
8.13
[S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection portion
0.82
0.48
0.34
[S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
9.95
16.90
24.16
Weld line generated in boss portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate (45° C., 3 M)
0/10
0/10
0/10
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
0/100
0/100
0/100
Crack generated near gate (45° C., 6 M)
0/10
0/10
0/10
Table 9 shows the results of the evaluation on the alkaline batteries in which the boss portion 20 had a 3.4 mm outer diameter R2. As shown in Table 9, the AAA alkaline batteries showed almost the same results as those of the AA alkaline batteries (see Table 5).
As indicated above, the AAA alkaline batteries showed almost the same results as those of the AA alkaline batteries. Specifically, for preventing the electrolyte leakage from the AAA alkaline battery during the prolonged storage, the ratio (S1/S2) between the axial cross-sectional area (S1) of the boss portion 20 and the axial cross-sectional area (S2) of the injection portion 24 is preferably set in the range of 10 to 25, and the outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 is preferably set in the range of 3.0 to 4.2 mm, more preferably 3.0 to 3.4 mm.
The advantages of the present invention will more remarkably be exhibited when the injection portion 24 at the end face of the boss portion 20 of the gasket 5 faces the battery components contained in the battery case.
The term “injection portion” used in the present specification indicates a trace of the injection molding gate of the injection mold left on the end face of the boss portion 20 of the injection molded gasket. The injection portion is not always limited to the cylindrical one as shown in
The material for the gasket 5 disclosed herein is not particularly limited, but for example, alkali- and heat-resistant 6,6-nylon, 6,10-nylon, 6,12-nylon, etc. may suitably be used.
<Gasket Containing Recycled Resin>
In general, a single injection mold can form multiple gaskets at a time. In this case, runner portions formed between the multiple gaskets are removed from the injection molded gaskets, and are mixed and reused together with a virgin material. However, due to different thermal history, the reused resin (recycled resin) does not stably flow when it is molten and injected into the injection mold, thereby inducing generation of the weld line.
To check the influence of the rate of the recycled resin (recycling rate) on the leakage resistance of the battery, the following evaluation was performed. Specifically, three types of gaskets having different recycling rates of 5, 20, and 40 wt % were prepared, and they were evaluated in the same manner as indicated in Table 2.
Table 10 shows the evaluation results. The dimensions of the respective portions of the gaskets were the same as those indicated in Table 10. The outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 was set to 4.0 mm, and the S1/S2 value was set to 16.57 and 7.29.
TABLE 10
Ex. 35
Ex. 36
Ex. 37
Ex. 38
Ex. 39
Ex. 40
Recycling rate (%)
5
20
40
5
20
40
Outer diameter of injection portion
1.45
1.80
[L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss portion [R1]
1.10
(mm)
Outer diameter of boss portion
4.00
[R2] (mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss
11.62
portion [S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection
0.70
1.59
portion [S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
16.57
7.29
Weld line generated in boss
0/50
0/50
0/50
20/50
26/50
30/50
portion
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
Crack generated near gate
0/10
0/10
0/10
7/10
8/10
10/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
0/100
0/100
0/100
16/100
21/100
38/100
Crack generated near gate
3/10
5/10
6/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
As shown in Table 10, the weld line and the sink mark were not found in both of the boss portion 20 and the rim portion 22 by the visual check in the gaskets (examples 35 and 36) having the S1/S2 value of 16.57, and the recycling rate of 5, 20, and 40 wt %. In the high-temperature high-humidity test and the storage test for testing the leakage resistance, none of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 35 and 36 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
On the other hand, the weld line was found in the boss portion 20 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (examples 38 to 40) having the S1/S2 value of 7.29, and the recycling rate of 5, 20, and 40 wt %. In the storage test (45° C., 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 38 to 40 experienced the electrolyte leakage, and the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in the batteries that experienced the leakage.
The above-described results indicate that setting the S1/S2 value in the range of 10 to 25 makes it possible to prevent electrolyte leakage from the alkaline battery using the gasket containing 5 to 40 wt % of the recycled resin during the prolonged storage.
<Gasket Added with Inorganic Filler>
An inorganic filler may generally be added to the resin to increase rigidity and heat resistance of the gasket. However, the resin added with the inorganic filler does not stably flow when it is molten and injected into the injection mold, thereby inducing generation of the weld line.
To check the influence of the amount of the added inorganic filler on the leakage resistance of the battery, the following evaluation was performed. Specifically, talc was used as the inorganic filler, and three types of gaskets added with 5, 10 and 15 wt % of talc, respectively, were prepared, and they were evaluated as indicated in Table 2.
Table 11 shows the evaluation results. The dimensions of the respective portions of the gaskets were the same as those indicated in Table 11. The outer diameter R2 of the boss portion 20 was set to 4.0 mm, and the S1/S2 value was set to 16.57 and 7.29.
TABLE 11
Ex. 41
Ex. 42
Ex. 43
Ex. 44
Ex. 45
Ex. 46
Amount of talc added (%)
5
10
15
5
10
15
Outer diameter of injection portion
1.45
1.80
[L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss portion [R1]
1.10
(mm)
Outer diameter of boss portion [R2]
4.00
(mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss portion
11.62
[S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection
0.70
1.59
portion [S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
16.57
7.29
Weld line generated in boss portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
25/50
31/50
40/50
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
5/110
10/110
Crack generated near gate
0/10
0/10
0/10
7/10
8/10
10/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
0/100
0/100
0/100
26/100
32/100
40/100
Crack generated near gate
4/10
7/10
8/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
As shown in Table 11, the weld line and the sink mark were not found in both of the boss portion 20 and the rim portion 22 by the visual check in the gaskets (examples 41 to 43) having the S1/S2 value of 16.57, and being added with 5, 10, and 15 wt % of talc. In the high-temperature high-humidity test and the storage test for testing the leakage resistance, none of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of the alkaline batteries of examples 41 to 43 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
On the other hand, the weld line was found in the boss portion 20 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (examples 44 to 46) having the S1/S2 value of 7.29, and being added with 5, 10, and 15 wt % of talc. In the storage test (45° C., 6 M), some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 44 to 46 experienced the electrolyte leakage, and the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in the batteries that experienced the electrolyte leakage.
The same evaluation was performed on the batteries added with kaoline as the inorganic filler.
Table 12 shows the evaluation results. As shown in Table 12, the weld line and the sink mark were not found in the boss portion 20 and the rim portion 22 by the visual check in the gaskets (examples 47 to 49) having the S1/S2 value of 16.57, and being added with 5, 10, and 15 wt % of kaoline. In the high-temperature high-humidity test and the storage test for testing the leakage resistance, none of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 47 to 49 experienced the electrolyte leakage.
TABLE 12
Ex. 47
Ex. 48
Ex. 49
Ex. 50
Ex. 51
Ex. 52
Amount of kaoline added (%)
5
10
15
5
10
15
Outer diameter of injection portion
1.45
1.80
[L] (mm)
Inner diameter of boss portion [R1]
1.10
(mm)
Outer diameter of boss portion [R2]
4.00
(mm)
Cross-sectional area of boss portion
11.62
[S1] (mm2)
Cross-sectional area of injection
0.70
1.59
portion [S2] (mm2)
S1/S2
16.57
7.29
Weld line generated in boss portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
18/50
23/50
35/50
Sink mark generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
Weld line generated in rim portion
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
0/50
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 1 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 2 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (60° C., 90%, 3 M)
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
0/20
Leakage (45° C., 3 M)
0/110
0/110
0/110
0/110
1/110
2/110
Crack generated near gate
0/10
0/10
0/10
3/10
5/10
7/10
(45° C., 3 M)
Leakage (45° C., 6 M)
0/100
0/100
0/100
5/100
18/100
23/100
Crack generated near gate
2/10
3/10
6/10
10/10
10/10
10/10
(45° C., 6 M)
The weld line was found in the boss portion 20 by the visual check in some of the gaskets (examples 50 to 52) having the S1/S2 value of 7.29, and being added with 5, 10, and 15 wt % of kaoline. In the storage test (45° C., 3 M, 6 M) for testing the leakage resistance, some of the alkaline batteries using the gaskets of examples 50 to 52 experienced the electrolyte leakage, and the crack was found in the gasket near the gate 12 in the alkaline batteries that experienced the electrolyte leakage.
The above-described results indicate that setting the S1/S2 value in the range of 10 to 25 makes it possible to prevent electrolyte leakage from the alkaline batteries using the gaskets added with 5 to 15 wt % of the inorganic filler during prolonged storage.
The inorganic filler may be calcium carbonate, carbon black, mica, or a blend of them.
The present invention has been described by way of the above-described preferred embodiments. However, such description of the embodiments should not be construed as limiting, and thus, various modifications can be made thereto. For example, although the above-described embodiments have been described using AA alkaline batteries as an example, similar advantages may be obtained for alkaline batteries of other sizes.
Kato, Susumu, Matsuhisa, Ichiro
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 11641044, | Apr 14 2020 | Energizer Brands, LLC | Battery housing and systems and methods of making thereof |
| 11949060, | Sep 11 2018 | Energizer Brands, LLC | Rechargeable hearing aid battery with slotted grommet |
| 12087899, | May 19 2021 | Energizer Brands, LLC | Electrode and separator feed system and method of use |
| 12119474, | Apr 02 2020 | Energizer Brands, LLC | Electrode bonding system and method of use |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 5672443, | Apr 15 1994 | Phillips Plastics Corporation | Battery sealing cap |
| 6206938, | Jun 30 1997 | Energizer Brands, LLC | Snap-through gasket for galvanic cells |
| 6472089, | Jun 13 2000 | Energizer Brands, LLC | Bottom cover design for battery with reverse protection |
| 6634649, | Jun 15 1998 | Sony Corporation | Gasket, method of molding same, and cylindrical alkaline-manganese dioxide cell using same |
| 20060083985, | |||
| JP2004134168, | |||
| JP2005093204, | |||
| JP8167405, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jul 08 2009 | MATSUHISA, ICHIRO | Panasonic Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023315 | /0607 | |
| Jul 08 2009 | KATO, SUSUMU | Panasonic Corporation | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023315 | /0607 | |
| Aug 05 2009 | Panasonic Corporation | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| May 06 2013 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Feb 08 2016 | RMPN: Payer Number De-assigned. |
| Feb 09 2016 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
| Mar 17 2016 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| Mar 16 2020 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Apr 23 2024 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 30 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 30 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 30 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 30 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 30 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 30 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 30 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 30 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 30 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 30 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 30 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 30 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |