The present invention refers to a recombinant malaria vaccine and a method for its manufacture.

Patent
   8318185
Priority
Jan 15 2007
Filed
Jan 11 2008
Issued
Nov 27 2012
Expiry
May 09 2028
Extension
119 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
0
4
all paid
1. A composition comprising
(a) a purified fragment p83/30 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein without heterologous sequences, wherein the p83/30 fragment is from plasmodium falciparum strain FCB-1; and
(b) a purified fragment p38/42 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein without heterologous sequences, wherein the p38/42 fragment is from a plasmodium falciparum strain other than FCB-1.
2. The composition of claim 1, wherein component (b) is a p38/42 fragment from a D-strain of plasmodium.
3. The composition of claim 2, wherein component (b) is a p38/42 fragment from plasmodium falciparum strain 3D7.
4. The composition of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are present in about equimolar amounts.
5. The composition of claim 1, wherein components (a) and (b) are recombinant polypeptides.
6. The composition of claim 1 which has a content of degradation products of less than 30%.
7. The composition of claim 1 which has a content of degradation products of less than 20%.
8. The composition of claim 1 which has a purity of at least 95% .
9. The composition of claim 1 which has a purity of at least 97.5%.
10. A pharmaceutical preparation comprising: a) a composition of claim 1; and b) one or more of a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, and a pharmaceutically acceptable adjuvant.
11. The pharmaceutical preparation of claim 10 which is a vaccine.
12. A method for manufacturing the composition of claim 1, the method comprising the steps:
(a) expressing the fragment p83/30 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein from plasmodium without heterologous sequences in a host cell,
(b) expressing the fragment p38/42 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein from plasmodium without heterologous sequences in a host cell,
(c) recovering the fragment p83/30 and the fragment p38/42 from the host cells,
(d) combining the fragments p83/30 and p38/42, and
(e) purifying the combined fragments.
13. The method of claim 12 wherein the fragments p83/30 and p38/42 are expressed in the same host cell.
14. The method of claim 12 wherein the fragments p83/30 and p38/42 are expressed in different first and second host cells.
15. The method of claim 12, wherein the host cell is a bacterial cell.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the bacterial cell is a gram-negative bacterial cell.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the bacterial cell is an E. coli cell.
18. The method of claim 15, wherein the host cell is an E. coli W3110Z2 cell.
19. The method of claim 12, wherein the fragments are separately recovered as inclusion bodies.
20. The method of claim 12, wherein the inclusion bodies are separately solubilized.
21. The method of claim 12, wherein the solubilized fragments are separately refolded.
22. The method of claim 12, wherein the fragments are combined in about equimolar amounts.
23. The method of claim 12, wherein the combined fragments are purified by size exclusion chromatography.

FIG. 1 depicts the expression vector pZE23D.

FIG. 2 depicts a comparison of the stability of inclusion bodies of the p83/30 fragment from a D- and an F-strain.

FIG. 3 depicts amino acid seciuences designated SEO ID NOs 1-4.

The present invention refers to a recombinant malaria vaccine and a method for its manufacture.

The merozoite surface protein (MSP-1) of the malaria parasite Plasmodium occurs on the surface of merozoites, the erythrocite invading form of Plasmodium. MSP-1 is produced as a precursor protein with a molecular weight of about 190 kDa which is proteolytically processed during merozoite maturation into four fragments designated as p83, p30, p38 and p42, which remain in a non-covalently associated form at the surface of the parasite. At the time of erythrocyte invasion, further proteolytic cleavage occurs.

The MSP-1 protein consists of several highly conserved regions, a dimorphic region associated with one of two allelic forms and of two relatively small oligomorphic blocks in the N-terminal region (Tanabe et al., J. Mol. Biol. 195 (1987) 273-287; Miller et al., Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 59 (1993), 1-14; which are herein incorporated by reference).

There is evidence that the MSP-1 protein is a potential vaccine candidate (Holder and Freeman, Nature 294 (1981), 361-364; Majarian et al., J. Immunol., 132 (1984), 3131-3137). Further, several vaccination studies with MSP-1 material from P. falciparum have been carried out on primates, particularly on Aotus and Saimiri monkeys (e.g. Perrin et al., J. Exp. Med. 160 (1984), 441-451; Hall et al., Nature 311 (1984) 379-382; Siddiqui et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84 (1987), 3014-3018; Ettlinger et al., Inf. 1 mm. 59 (1991), 3498-3503; Holder et al., Parasite Immunol. 10 (1988), 607-617; Herrera et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87 (1990), 4017-4021; Herrera et al., Inf. 1 mm. 60 (1992), 154-158 and Patarroyo et al., Nature 328 (1987), 629-632, which are herein incorporated by reference).

Vaccination studies with overlapping recombinant fragments of the MSP-1 protein from E. coli gave protection (Tolle et al., Infect. Immun. 61 (1993), 40-47). A protective effect was also found after administration of the C-terminal domain of the MSP-1 protein in form of the p19 or p42 polypeptide (Chang et al., Inf. 1 mm. 64 (1996), 253-261). WO 98/14583 describes a method for producing a recombinant complete MSP-1 polypeptide by decreasing the AT content of the expressed DNA sequence compared to the naturally occurring sequence. There are, however, some drawbacks associated with the process described in WO 98/14583. First, the production method only allows efficient purification in the presence of N- and/or C-terminal sequence tags. Second, the purification method only works on a small scale. An adaptation to large-scale purification methods which are required in industrial processes for vaccine manufacture is not readily available.

Kauth et al. (J. Biol. Chem. 278 (2003), 22257-22264) describe the in vitro reconstitution of the MSP-1 polypeptide of P. falciparum strain 3D7 from heterologuously produced subunits. A purification is, however, only described for polypeptides which are fused to heterologous sequence tags such as GST, strep or hexahistidine tags. The presence of such heterologous sequences in a vaccine, however, is undesirable.

The present invention overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art by providing a composition comprising

Preferably, the purified p83/30 fragment is an F-fragment, i.e. a fragment derived from an F-strain of Plasmodium, particularly from the P. falciparum strain FCB-1 also known as FC or F. Surprisingly, it was found that the F-fragment is more stably against proteolytic degradation than the D-fragment, i.e. a fragment derived from a D-strain of Plasmodium, particularly from the P. falciparum strain 3D7 also known as NF54. Further, it was surprisingly found that the p38/30 F-fragment may be combined with a heterologous and/or a homologous p38/42 fragment, e.g. with a heterologous p38/42 D-fragment and/or a p38/42 F-fragment.

In the composition of the invention components (a) and (b) are preferably present in about equimolar amounts, e.g. molar ratios of from 1.5:1 to 1:1.5, more preferably from 1.2:1 to 1:1.2 and most preferably from about 1:1 of component (a) to component (b).

Preferably, at least 70%, more preferably at least 80% and most preferably at least 90% of the fragments in the composition are present as non-covalently associated dimer.

Components (a) and (b) are preferably recombinant polypeptides, i.e. polypeptides which have been manufactured in a recombinant host cell, e.g. a eukaryotic host cell such as a yeast cell, e.g. S. cerevisiae or P. pastoris, or in prokaryotic cells, e.g. gram-negative bacterial cells such as E. coli. Preferably, the recombinant host cell is a E. coli cell. More preferably, the host cell is E. coli W3110Z2.

In a preferred embodiment, the composition of the invention has a purity of at least 95% and more, preferably of at least 97.5%, as determined by SDS gel electrophoresis and silver staining. In this context, the term “purity” refers to the absence of heterologous polypeptides, i.e. non-MSP-1 polypeptides.

In a further preferred embodiment, the composition has a content of degradation products of less than 30%, more preferably of less than 20%, and most preferably of less than 10%, as measured by SDS gel electrophoresis and immuno-staining. In this context, the term “degradation products” refers to polypeptide molecules which result from a degradation of the p83/30 fragment or the p38/42 fragment as described above.

The composition of the invention comprises a purified fragment p83/30 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein from Plasmodium and a purified fragment p38/42 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein from Plasmodium. The term “p83/30 fragment” refers to a single polypeptide comprising the p83 fragment and the p30 fragment of the MSP-1 protein of Plasmodium. Preferably, the composition comprises a p83/30 fragment from a Plasmodium F-strain. The p38/42 fragment is a single polypeptide comprising the p38 fragment and the p42 fragment of the MSP-1 protein from Plasmodium. The p38/42 fragment may be derived from any Plasmodium strain, e.g. a D-strain or an F-strain of P. falciparum.

The p83/30 fragment preferably comprises the amino acid sequence of an F-strain of P. falciparum as shown in SEQ ID NO:1 and optionally an N-terminal signal peptide sequence or a modified F-fragment derived from the F-strain sequence. In a less preferred embodiment, the p83/30 fragment comprises the amino acid sequence of a D-strain of P. falciparum and optionally an N-terminal signal peptide sequence or a modified D-strain sequence. The amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID NO:2 is derived from the amino acid sequence of a D-strain and comprises 2 amino acid substitutions at position 611 (E→K) and 866 (Q→H).

The p38/42 fragment may be derived from an F-strain of P. falciparum as shown in SEQ ID NO:3 and/or from a D-strain of P. falciparum as shown in SEQ ID NO:4. Surprisingly, it was found that a p83/30 fragment of an F-strain may be both combined with a homologous p38/42 fragment from an F-strain or with a heterologous p38/42 fragment from a different P. falciparum strain, e.g. a D-strain.

The terms “p83/30 fragment” and “p38/42 fragment” also refer to modified fragments which have an amino acid sequence identity of at least 90%, preferably of at least 95% and more preferably of at least 98% over the entire length of the polypeptide to a native p83/30 or p38/42 fragment. The terms also encompass truncated fragments which may comprise deletions of single amino acids and/or amino acid portions of up to 10, more preferably up to 5 amino acids compared to the wild-type polypeptide. A p83/30 fragment preferably has a length of at least 800 amino acids, more preferably of at least 850 amino acids. Further, the p83/30 fragment has a sequence identity of at least 90%, more preferably at least 95% and, most preferably, at least 98% with the p83/30 fragment of the P. falciparum F-variant in SEQ ID NO:1.

The p38/42 fragment preferably has a length of at least 700 amino acids and more preferably at least 750 amino acids. Further, it is preferred that the p38/42 fragment has a sequence identity of at least 90%, more preferably at least 95% and, most preferably, at least 98%, compared to the p38/42 fragments from a P. falciparum F-strain (SEQ ID NO:3) and/or from a D-strain (SEQ ID NO:4).

The amino acid sequence of particularly preferred embodiments of p83/30 and p38/42 are shown in SEQ ID NO:1, 2, 3 and 4.

The present invention also refers to a pharmaceutical preparation comprising a composition as described above and pharmaceutically acceptable carriers, diluents and/or adjuvants. Preferably, the preparation is a vaccine.

The vaccine may be present as reconstitutable lyophilisate, as liquid, e.g. as solution or suspension, or as emulsion, e.g. as water-in-oil emulsion. The vaccine may comprise adjuvants such as alum, MF59 or BCG, including recombinant BCG as disclosed in PCT/EP2005/011127, “Combination of a bacterial cell and a biologically active agent” which is herein incorporated by reference. The vaccine is preferably administered by injection, e.g. intradermal, subcutaneous or intramuscular injection.

A preferred dosage of the vaccine comprises 1-500 μg, more preferably 20-100 μg protein for application in human medicine. The vaccine may be administered in a single dose or in multiple doses. The administration in multiple doses is preferred.

The composition of the present invention may be manufactured by a process comprising the steps

The expression of the fragments p83/30 and p38/42 may be carried out in a single host cell or separately in a first host cell and in a second host cell. The use of separate first and second host cells is preferred. The host cell may be provided by transfection with a nucleic acid encoding the respective MSP-1 fragment. Preferably, the nucleic acid encoding the p83/30 fragment and the nucleic acid encoding the p38/42 fragment may be located on an expression vector suitable for the respective host cell, e.g. a gram-negative bacterial cell such as an E. coli cell. The expression vector may be an episomal vector such as a plasmid, or a chromosomally integrated vector. The expression vector comprises the nucleic acid in operative linkage with a suitable expression control sequence, e.g. which may comprise a constitutive or an inducible promoter. The expression vector may comprise further genetic elements, e.g. an origin of replication, a selection marker etc. Examples of suitable expression vectors are disclosed in Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning, A Laboratory Manual (1989), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, and other standard text books.

When the host cells are bacterial cells, e.g. E. coli cells, the fragments are preferably expressed in insoluble form, e.g. as inclusion bodies. Preferably, the fragments are separately recovered as inclusion bodies which may be separately solubilized, e.g. in the presence of chaotropic salts such as guanidinium hydrochloride and subsequently refolded, e.g. in the presence of arginine and thiol reagents such as glutathione. Alternatively, the p83/30 and p38/42 fragments may be combined before solubilization, after solubilization or after refolding in a suitable molar ratio. After refolding, the fragments are transferred to a suitable buffer which may comprise a non-ionic surfactant such as Tween 80, Tween 20 or Triton X-100. If desired, the fragments may be separately purified by subsequent processing steps, comprising at least one of the following: filtration, anion and/or cation exchange chromatography such as Q-sepharose HP-chromatography, or SP-sepharose HP-chromatography, conditioning and concentration, e.g. by ultrafiltration.

According to step (d), the fragments are combined. Preferably, the fragments are combined in about equimolar amounts as indicated above. The amount of the respective fragment may be determined by spectroscopic protein measurements, e.g. by determining UV absorption at 280 nm. It is especially preferred that the fragments are combined in the absence of heterologous polypeptides such as albumin.

After combining, the fragments may be further purified, e.g. by size exclusion chromatography, e.g. using Sephacryl S 300-HR/GE. Further treatments may comprise filtration, concentration and sterilisation, e.g. by sterile filtration.

The nucleic acids encoding the fragments p83/30 and p38/42 may have a reduced AT content compared to the wild type sequence as described in WO 98/14583, which is herein incorporated by reference.

Further, the invention refers to a composition comprising a purified fragment p83/30 of the gp190/MSP-1 protein from a Plasmodium F-strain. The p83/30 fragment preferably comprises the sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO:1 or a modified sequence as described above. This composition is preferably used as a pharmaceutical preparation, e.g. as a vaccine as described above. With regard to the preferred characteristics, e.g. purity and/or content of degradation products, of this composition, it is referred to the disclosure as described above.

The present invention shall be explained by the following examples:

The amino acid sequence of the p83/30 fragment is shown in SEQ ID NO:1 (F-strain) or SEQ ID NO:2 (D-strain). A nucleic acid sequence encoding such a fragment was cloned into the expression vector pZE23D 83/30 shown in FIG. 1. The fragment encoding nucleic acid is operatively linked with the IPTG-inducible pA1lacO1 promoter. The E. coli production strain was W3110Z2 (e.g. Bacteriol. Ref. 36, (1972), 525-530; Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981), 7069-7072).

The E. coli cells were pre-cultured in LB medium. The pre-culture was diluted 1:50 with Superbroth and cultivated in a fermenter at 37° C. At an optical density (OD600) of 1.5, doxycycline (200 ng/ml) was added. At OD600=4.5, IPTG (1 mM) was added.

The cells were harvested at an OD600=7 or 2.5 h after induction with IPTG.

The harvested bacteria were disrupted by continuous homogenization at a turn over rate of 10 l/h and 1500 bar maximal pressure (Niro-Soavi, Type Panda). The homogenate was centrifuged for 30 min at 6000 g followed by two wash/centrifugation cycles in order to obtain the inclusion bodies.

A comparison of the stability of inclusion bodies of the p83/30 fragment from a D- and an F-strain is shown in FIG. 2. The lanes on the figure are as follows:

1+9: marker;

2: fermentation sample of F-83/30;

3: IBs F-83/30 after preparation;

4: bovine serum albumin (BSA) 800 ng;

5: BSA 600 ng;

6: BSA 400 ng;

7: BSA 200 ng;

8: BSA 100 ng;

10: IBs F-83/30 (after storage for 9 months at −18° C.);

11: IBs of D-83/30 (after preparation);

12: fermentation sample of F-83/30;

13: fermentation sample of D-83/30.

It is evident from FIG. 2 that the p83/30 fragment of a P. falciparum F-strain is significantly more stable than the corresponding p83/30 fragment from a D-strain.

The amino acid sequence of the p38/42 fragment is shown in SEQ ID NO:3 (F-strain) or SEQ ID NO:4 (D-strain).

Inclusion bodies of the p38/42 fragment were produced substantially as described in Example 1 for the p83/30 fragment.

The inclusion bodies obtained in Examples 1 and 2 were separately solubilized by adding solubilization buffer (6 M guanidinium HCl; 50 mM Na phosphate; 10 mM dithiotreitol, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) to the Inclusion Bodies (IBs).

For the p83/30 fragments, three different ratios of IBs to solubilization buffer were used, namely 1 g IB+2.5 ml buffer; 1 g IB+4.0 ml buffer and 1 g IB+8.0 ml buffer. For the p38/40 fragment, 1 g IB were added to 2.5 ml buffer.

The filtrate was subjected to a refolding procedure by incubation in 500 mM arginine, 50 mM Na phosphate, 1 mM L-glutathione reduced, 0.1 mM glutathione oxidized, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0 overnight at room temperature.

The resulting protein solutions were 5× concentrated by ultrafiltration. The buffer was exchanged with 20 mM Na phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween 80 pH 8.0. After filtration in a 0.2 μm filter, the product was subjected to Q-sepharose HP chromatography. The elusion took place in a 0-100% gradient of buffer A (20 mM Na phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, 0.01 Tween 80 pH 8.0) and buffer B (20 mM Na phosphate, 350 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween 80 pH 8.0).

The eluates were conditioned by dilution 1:5 in dilution buffer (10 mM Na phosphate, 0.01% Tween 80 pH 5,8) and filtered through a 0.2 μm filter. The resulting product was subjected to an SP sepharose HP chromatography and eluted in a gradient of 0-100% of buffer A (10 mM Na phosphate, 50 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween 80, pH 5.8) and buffer B (10 mM Na phosphate, 600 mM NaCl, 0.01% Tween 80, pH 5.8). Subsequently, the pH was adjusted to 7.4.

The protein solutions were concentrated to 4 mg/ml by ultrafiltration. Then, both subunits were pooled in a ratio of 1:1 (based on total protein amounts measured by UV at 280 nm) in the absence of heterologous polypeptides. After filtration, the composition was subjected to size exclusion chromatography, e.g. with Sephacryl-S-300 HR/GE in 1×PBS buffer pH 7.2-7.4. The composition was optionally concentrated by ultrafiltration in order to provide a concentration of up to 1 mg protein/ml. After sterile filtration, the composition was stored.

Bujard, Hermann, Lutz, Rolf, Kauth, Christian, Epp, Christian, Wöhlbier, Ute

Patent Priority Assignee Title
Patent Priority Assignee Title
6933130, Oct 02 1996 SUMAYA BIOTECH GMBH & CO KG Recombinants process for preparing a complete malaria antigen, gp190/MSP1
EP1637602,
WO2004038024,
WO9814583,
/////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jan 11 2008Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg(assignment on the face of the patent)
Aug 20 2009BUJARD, HERMANNBUJARD, HERMANNASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0291810837 pdf
Aug 21 2009WOHLBIER, UTEBUJARD, HERMANNASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0233830193 pdf
Sep 04 2009LUTZ, ROLFBUJARD, HERMANNASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0291810837 pdf
Sep 04 2009KAUTH, CHRISTIANBUJARD, HERMANNASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0291810837 pdf
Sep 04 2009EPP, CHRISTIANBUJARD, HERMANNASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0291810837 pdf
Sep 21 2009WOHLBIER, UTEBUJARD, HERMANNASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0291810837 pdf
Oct 15 2012BUJARD, HERMANNRuprecht-Karls-Universitat HeidelbergASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0291810866 pdf
May 31 2016RUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITÄT HEIDELBERGSUMAYA BIOTECH GMBH & CO KGASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0388340690 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Apr 12 2013ASPN: Payor Number Assigned.
Apr 24 2016M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 14 2016LTOS: Pat Holder Claims Small Entity Status.
May 03 2020M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity.
Apr 23 2024M2553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Nov 27 20154 years fee payment window open
May 27 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 27 2016patent expiry (for year 4)
Nov 27 20182 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Nov 27 20198 years fee payment window open
May 27 20206 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 27 2020patent expiry (for year 8)
Nov 27 20222 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Nov 27 202312 years fee payment window open
May 27 20246 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Nov 27 2024patent expiry (for year 12)
Nov 27 20262 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)