In a method for asynchronously transmitting control signals from a transmitter end to at least one receiver via a plurality of control lines, control signals received via the individual control lines are logically combined with one another at the receiver end and the result of the logic combination is transmitted to the transmitter end.
|
18. A transmitter comprising:
control signal outputs for sending asynchronously control signals to at least one receiver,
at least one control signal input for receiving a signature signal and
a checking device which is set up to check the signature signal on the basis of the control signals and a logic combination, wherein the logic combination is an exclusive-OR combination.
1. A method for asynchronously transmitting control signals from a transmitter to at least one receiver via a plurality of control lines, the method comprising:
receiving at the at least one receiver the control signals respectively via the individual control lines; and
combining logically the received control signals with one another at the at least one receiver and
transmitting the result of the logic combination to the transmitter,
wherein the logic combination is an exclusive-OR combination.
3. The method according to
4. The method according to
5. The method according to
6. The method according to
7. The method according to
8. The method according to
9. The method according to
10. The method according to
11. The method according to
12. The method according to
13. The method according to
14. The method according to
15. The method according to
16. The method according to
17. The method according to
19. The transmitter according to
|
The present invention relates to a method for checking asynchronous transmission of control signals and to apparatuses for carrying out the method.
Control signals must be interchanged between two or more components in many applications, special importance being attached to data integrity during transmission.
In the field of clock-controlled data transmission, it is known practice, in serial data transmission, for example in the CAN or FlexRay protocol, to form checksums over the transmitted data and to transmit said checksums together with the data. At the receiver end, it is thus possible to use the checksums to check the received data. In the case of clocked data transmission, it is generally known practice to form horizontal checksums over data transmitted in succession and to form vertical checksums over data transmitted in a parallel manner at the same time and to transmit said checksums together with the data to a receiver. In this case, for clock-controlled data transmission, it is necessary either to additionally transmit a clock to the receiver or to recover the clock at the receiver using a complicated circuit. Both disadvantageously constitute an outlay which is accepted only for complex systems.
According to one embodiment in a method for asynchronously transmitting control signals from a transmitter end to at least one receiver via a plurality of control lines, control signals respectively received via the individual control lines are logically combined with one another at the receiver end and the result of the logic combination is transmitted to the transmitter end.
According to a further embodiment a transmitter comprises control signal outputs for sending control signals to at least one receiver, at least one control signal input for receiving a signature signal and a checking device which is set up to check the signature signal on the basis of the control signals and a logic combination
According to a further embodiment a receiver comprises at least one control signal input for receiving at least one control signal, a signature generator for asynchronously logically combining at least one received control signal and a signature output for asynchronously emitting a result of the logic combination.
According to one embodiment, when asynchronously transmitting control signals from a transmitter end to at least one receiver via control lines, the control signals received via the control lines are logically combined with one another at the receiver end and the result of the logic combination is transmitted to the transmitter end. The control signals are transmitted in a parallel manner via the plurality of control lines and the control signals received via the individual control lines are logically combined with one another and the result is transmitted back to the transmitter end. This is carried out in an asynchronous manner, the logic combination not being carried out in a clock-controlled manner and thus being able to be carried out with a very short latency. The latency can be determined solely by the processing speed of the logic circuit involved or may also be set to a fixed predetermined value.
The received control signals are, in particular, continuously logically combined with one another. As a result, it is possible for the result of the logic combination to be available at least essentially immediately in the event of every state change of the received control signals and for said result to be transmitted to the transmitter end. The transmitter end can thus receive feedback for the transmission of the control signals with a very short delay and can very quickly determine errors in the transmission. The transmitter end can therefore react very quickly if an error has been determined in the transmission of the control signals and can, for example, stop the emission of further control signals or can change the at least one receiver to a safe state in which the at least one receiver does not carry out any actions or at least does not carry out any hazardous actions, for example.
As a result of the fact that the result is transmitted back to the transmitter end, it is possible to check at the transmitter end whether the transmission or the control lines has/have been subject to interference, in which case it is possible to detect both interference which results in incorrectly transmitted control signals and interference which interferes with the time of transmission.
The control signals may be, for example, pulse-width-modulated or pulse-duration-modulated control signals. Asynchronous control signals generally do not have a clock, with the result that they can change their state independently of a clock pattern. Since the receiver-end logic combination is applied to the control signals received via the individual control lines, the receiver-end logic combination can be carried out with a slight time delay for every state change of the control signals, with the result that the result of the receiver-end logic combination is immediately available and can be checked.
As a result of the fact that the receiver-end logic combination is carried out in an asynchronous manner, the result can also be transmitted to the transmitter end in an asynchronous manner and the control signals received via the signal lines can be checked in an asynchronous manner. It is thus possible to check both the error-free transmission of the state of the control signals, that is to say the information transmitted with the control signals, and the time of transmission.
The method makes it possible to check the transmission of, for example, PWM signals for power drivers or converters. Such signals have a very fine granularity or step size, with the result that the time of transmission must be able to be checked in a very precise manner. A step size of 50 ns, for example, results for a resolution of 10 bits for each PWM period and a frequency of 20 kHz. The method can also be used when controlling gate drivers.
The term transmitter end may also include a plurality of circuit components which are arranged at the transmitter end. This may be, for example, an individual transmitter or a transmitting device with an associated signature checking device, the signature checking device being able to be a circuit which is separate from the transmitting device. For example, a conventional transmitting device which is not suitable for carrying out the method can thus be retrofitted in order to carry out the method. For this purpose, the signature checking device is associated with a conventional transmitting device in such a manner that the control signals emitted by the transmitting device are read by the signature checking device and the result of the receiver-end logic combination, which is transmitted back from the at least one receiver, is received by the signature checking device. The signature checking device can check the received signature on the basis of the control signals. The result of this check can be transmitted from the signature checking device to the transmitting device or to another circuit. The signature checking device receives both the result of the receiver-end logic combination and the transmitted control signals and can thus check the result of the receiver-end logic combination on the basis of the control signals.
In one variant, the signature checking device may also receive a transmitter signature or the result of a transmitter-end logic combination of the control signature and the result of the receiver-end logic combination. In this variant, the signature checking device receives two signatures which can be used by said device to detect errors in the transmission of the control signals. The transmitter signature can be generated by a separate circuit or by a transmitting device. As a rule, the transmitter signature has a smaller bit width or generally requires fewer lines for transmission. If the transmitter signature is generated in a transmitting device and is output to a signature checking device, the line and connections of the circuits involved can be saved. The transmitter signature can thus be generated in the transmitting device.
Furthermore, the transmitter may also be a transmission driver circuit which receives control signals generated by a separate transmitting device and forwards them to the control lines. In this case, the transmission driver circuit also receives the result of the receiver-end logic combination, which result is transmitted from the at least one receiver. The transmission driver circuit checks this result of the receiver-end logic combination on the basis of the control signals.
In one embodiment, checking of the result of the receiver-end logic combination is suspended for a particular period of time. This makes it possible to take into account delays in the receiver-end logic combination and/or in the transmission of the result of the receiver-end logic combination. Despite transmission without interference, such delays could otherwise result in an indication of transmission interference.
In particular, state changes of the control signals are detected and the checking of the result of the receiver-end logic combination is suspended for a particular period of time following each state change. Since the check takes place at the transmitter end, the state changes are preferably carried out in the transmitter or in the device which receives the result of the receiver-end logic combination and checks said combination on the basis of the transmitted control signals.
The circuit arrangement schematically illustrated in
The transmitter-end signature generator 5 logically combines the control signals PWM1-PWM3 with one another and transmits the result of this transmitter-end logic combination to a signature checking device 13 in the transmitter 1. The result of the transmitter-end logic combination is also referred to as the transmitter signature below.
The receiver 2 has a control signal input 7 having a plurality of input stages or input connections which are each connected to one of the control lines 23. The control signal input 7 forwards the received control signals PWM1-PWM3 to a receiver-end signature generator 11 in the receiver 2 and to drivers 8 in the receiver 2. The drivers 8 amplify the control signals PWM1-PWM3 and forward them, in amplified form, to respective switches 16 in the receiver 2 which energize loads, for example, or generally perform control tasks on the basis of the respective control signal PWM1-PWM3.
The receiver-end signature generator 11 logically combines the received control signals PWM1-PWM3 with one another and transmits the result of this receiver-end logic combination to a signature output 10 of the receiver 2. The result of the receiver-end logic combination is also referred to as the receiver signature below. The signature output 10 is connected to a signature input 12 of the transmitter 1 via a signature line 9. The signature output 10 and the signature input 12 are depicted as a driver and an input stage, respectively, in the figures. The term input or output generally also includes circuit parts which are involved in reception or transmission such as output drivers or input stages. Inputs may also include comparators, for example Schmitt triggers, in order to shape received digital signals.
The receiver-end signature generator 11 is set up to logically combine the received control signals PWM1-PWM3 with one another without delay. The result of the receiver-end logic combination is emitted on the signature line 9 in an asynchronous manner.
The signature input 12 of the transmitter 1 is connected to the signature checking device 13 which thus receives the receiver signature and the transmitter signature. The signature checking device 13 compares both signatures and outputs an error signal 14 if the receiver signature differs from the transmitter signature. The transmitter-end signature generator 5 and the receiver-end signature generator 11 are set up in such a manner that they carry out the same logic combination, with the result that the transmitter signature is the same as the receiver signature when there is no interference. In one variant, the two signature generators 5, 11 may also carry out different logic combinations, the receiver signature and the transmitter signature being able to differ from one another in this case and the signature checking device 13 having to take into account the different logic combinations. For this purpose, the signature checking device 13 must have knowledge of the two logic combinations at the transmitter end and at the receiver end or must have knowledge of at least the difference between the two logic combinations in so far as the difference is relevant to the comparison of the transmitter signature and the receiver signature. The transmitter-end signature generator 5 may also be combined with the signature checking device 13 to form a checking device.
The signature checking device 13 is also set up to suspend the comparison of the transmitter signature and the receiver signature for a particular period of time following a state change of the transmitter signature in order to avoid generating an incorrect error signal 14 on account of time delays. The comparison can also be suspended by inhibiting or suppressing the error signal 14 for this period of time.
For each state change of at least one control signal PWM1-PWM3, the suspension signal BLANK changes from low to high for a predetermined suspension period. After the suspension period has elapsed, the suspension signal changes from high to low again. The suspension period is such that the transmission of the control signals PWM1-PWM3, the generation of the receiver signature and the transmission of the latter back to the transmitter 1 have been reliably concluded inside this period. As a rule, only gate delay times need to be taken into account in this case, with the result that the suspension period may be in the range of a few microseconds or nanoseconds, for example.
Each receiver 2a-2c has a signature generator 11a-11c, a signature input 15a-15c and a signature output 10a-10c. The signature generator 11a-11c in each receiver 2a-2c receives the control signal received by the respective receiver 2a-2c and the signature signal received by the respective receiver 2a-2c at the respective signature input 15a-15c.
The receivers are set up in such a manner that, if a signature signal is not received at the signature input 15a-15c, the signature generator 11a-11c uses a standard signal at the corresponding input. This may be effected by providing a pull-up or pull-down resistor which pulls an open signature input 15a-15c, or a signature input 15a-15c which has not been connected, to a fixed potential and thus ensures a standard value at this input.
The receivers 2a-2c are connected in series, for which purpose the signature output 10a, 10b of one receiver 2a, 2b is connected to the signature input 15b, 15c of a receiver 2b, 2c which follows in the series via a signature ring line 17. The signature input 15a of the receiver 2a which is first in the series is not connected. The signature output 10c of the receiver 2c which is last in the series is connected to the signature input 12 of the transmitter 1 via the signature line 9.
As a result of the fact that the individual receivers 2a-2c are connected in series via the signature outputs 10a-10b or the signature inputs 15b-15c, a receiver signature can be generated using a plurality of control signals PWM1-PWM3 even if the control signals PWM1-PWM3 are transmitted to different receivers 2a-2c. In this case, the control signals PWM1-PWM3 need not belong together or be related to one another. The result of the logic combination of all received control signals PWM1-PWM3 is transmitted back to the transmitter end, with the result that the transmission of all control signals PWM1-PWM3 even to a plurality of separate receivers 2a-2c can be checked using a single signal which is transmitted back.
The XOR gate 11 which is connected first in the series receives a control signal PWM1 and a standard value 24, which may be high or low, at its inputs. The output of this XOR gate 11 is connected to an input of the XOR gate 11 which follows it in the series. The output of the XOR gate 11 which is connected last in the series thus provides the result of the transmitter-end logic combination and thus the transmitter signature. As a result, it is possible to set which control signals or internal control signal lines are taken into account when generating the transmitter signature. A transmitting device may thus be set up to generate a particular number of control signals. If, depending on use, not all of the control signals are required, the generation of the transmitter signature may be restricted to the control signals used. It is thus possible to create standard versions of the transmitting device which are each designed for a particular number of control signals, not all of which have to be used, however.
The transmitter 1 also has a signature checking device 13, an edge detection device 21 and a suspension timing element 22. An output of the edge detection device 21 is connected to an input of the suspension timing element 22 which is in turn connected to the signature checking device 13. The signature checking device also receives, via a signature input 12 of the transmitter 1, a receiver signature transmitted from the receiver 2 and is set up to compare the transmitter signature with the receiver signature.
The transmitter signature is passed to the edge detection device 21 and the signature checking device 13. The edge detection device 21 detects the edges of the transmitter signature and thus every change of the transmitter signature. The suspension timing element 22 is started after every detected edge in order to transmit a particular signal to the signature checking device 13 for a particular suspension period in order to interrupt or suspend the comparison of the transmitter signature and the receiver signature in the signature checking device 13 for this suspension period.
As in the previous exemplary embodiment according to
The two XOR gates 11 have two further inputs which receive the control signal PWM and the inhibit signal Inhibit, with the result that the XOR gates 11 carry out an XOR combination of the signature signal received via the signature input 15, the control signal PWM received via the control signal input 7 and the inhibit signal Inhibit received via the inhibit input 25 and transmit the result of this combination, via the signature output 10, to a receiver 2 connected downstream in the series or to the transmitter end if the receiver 2 is last in the series. In this exemplary embodiment, it is possible to check the functionality of the transmission of both the control signal PWM and the inhibit signal Inhibit without generating a controlling signal at the output of the driver 8. If the inhibit signal Inhibit is low or inactive, the signature signal output can be changed by changing the control signal PWM, which change in the signature signal can be evaluated at the transmitter end without an active signal appearing at the output of the driver 8. Conversely, the control signal PWM can be kept at low and the inhibit signal Inhibit can be changed. In this case too, the signature signal is changed and can be evaluated at the transmitter end without an active signal appearing at the output of the driver 8.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
8908782, | Sep 17 2009 | Infineon Technologies AG | Method and apparatus for checking asynchronous transmission of control signals |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
7793021, | Jan 05 2006 | SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Method for synchronizing a transmission of information and a device having synchronizing capabilities |
20040003332, | |||
DE102005024988, | |||
DE2433025, | |||
DE2503679, | |||
DE2513323, | |||
DE2642977, | |||
DE2643518, | |||
DE2644106, | |||
DE2846358, | |||
DE4038596, | |||
EP382390, | |||
EP498118, | |||
JP59178036, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 09 2009 | BARRENSCHEEN, JENS | Infineon Technologies AG | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023269 | /0653 | |
Sep 17 2009 | Infieon Technologies AG | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jan 03 2013 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 07 2016 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 10 2020 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 05 2024 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Dec 18 2015 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jun 18 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 18 2016 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Dec 18 2018 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Dec 18 2019 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jun 18 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 18 2020 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Dec 18 2022 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Dec 18 2023 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jun 18 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Dec 18 2024 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Dec 18 2026 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |