A foot sensor device and method for gait enhancement, the device including: (a) a sensor unit having a casing, the sensor unit for disposing within a shoe of a user, the sensor unit for sensing a parameter associated with a gait event; (b) an electronic communication unit, electrically associated with the sensor unit, for receiving a signal pertaining to the parameter, the electronic unit having: (i) a microcontroller; (ii) a transmitting unit for transmitting, in a wireless fashion, gait information based on the signal, to a unit of an orthosis external to the foot sensor device, and (iii) a housing for housing at least one of the microcontroller and the transmitting unit, and (c) a fastening unit, attached to the housing, adapted to fasten on to the shoe, so as to secure the communication unit in a fixed position during gait.

Patent
   8382688
Priority
Nov 16 2005
Filed
Dec 04 2009
Issued
Feb 26 2013
Expiry
Jan 12 2027
Extension
78 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Large
39
102
all paid
1. A sensor device, comprising:
a sensor including a casing and a sensor element disposed within the casing, the sensor being configured to detect a parameter associated with a gait event;
an electronic communication unit in electrical communication with the sensor and configured to receive from the sensor information associated with the parameter, the electronic communication unit configured for wireless communication with an external device, the electronic communication unit including a housing that is substantially mechanically independent of the casing of the sensor, the housing of the electronic communication unit having a proximal end portion, a distal end portion and an inner face extended between the proximal end portion of the housing and the distal end portion of the housing, the inner face of the housing configured to face a body; and
a fastener having a proximal end portion coupled to the distal end portion of the housing of the electronic communication unit by a hinge such that no portion of the fastener is disposed between the inner face of the housing and the body when the inner face of the housing is facing the body, the hinge configured to permit adjustment of the housing with respect to the fastener such that an angle of the inner face of the housing with respect to the fastener can be selectively increased and decreased.
15. A sensor device, comprising:
a sensor configured to sense a parameter associated with a gait event, the sensor configured to be disposed within a shoe;
an electronic communication unit electrically associated with and physically distinct from the sensor, the electronic communication unit configured to receive a signal associated with the parameter, the electronic communication unit configured to wirelessly transmit gait information based on the signal to an external device, the electronic communication unit including a housing, the housing of the electronic communication unit having a proximal end portion a distal end portion and an inner face extended between the proximal end portion of the housing and the distal end portion of the housing, the inner face of the housing configured to face a body, at least a portion of the inner face of the housing being concave and configured to substantially conform to an adjacent body part; and
a fastener including a proximal end at least semi-rigidly attached to the distal end portion of the housing of the electronic communication unit by a hinge such that no portion of the fastener is disposed between the inner face of the housing and the body when the inner face of the housing is facing the body, the hinge configured to permit adjustment of the housing with respect to the fastener such that an angle of the inner face of the housing with respect to the fastener can be selectively increased and decreased, the fastener adapted to secure the electronic communication unit to the shoe during the gait event, the housing of the electronic communication unit being disposed above the fastener and being disposed wholly above a portion of a rim of the shoe when the electronic communication unit is secured to the shoe by the fastener during the gait event.
9. A sensor device, comprising:
a sensor unit configured to undergo a change in resistance during a gait event, the sensor unit including a casing and a sensor element disposed within the casing, the casing of the sensor unit having a perimeter less than or approximately equal to a perimeter of a heel of a user, the sensor unit being removably positionable beneath an insole of a shoe; and
an electronic communication unit coupled to the sensor unit by a conductive element, the electronic communication unit configured to receive from the sensor unit gait information associated with the change in resistance, the conductive element having sufficient flexibility to permit unconstrained movement of a housing of the electronic communication unit toward the sensor unit, the electronic communication unit including a transceiver configured to facilitate wireless transmission of a signal associated with the gait information to an external device and to facilitate receipt of a wireless signal from the external device, the housing of the electronic communication unit having a proximal end portion, a distal end portion and an inner face extended between the proximal end portion of the housing and the distal end portion of the housing, the inner face of the housing configured to face a body of the user; and
a fastener having a proximal end portion coupled to the distal end portion of the housing of the electronic communication unit by a hinge such that no portion of the fastener is disposed between the inner face of the housing and the body when the inner face of the housing is facing the body, the hinge configured to permit adjustment of the housing with respect to the fastener such that an angle of the inner face of the housing with respect to the fastener can be selectively increased and decreased.
2. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the fastener has an inner face configured to face the body when the inner face of the housing is facing the body, the fastener is configured to be fastened to an article of clothing, the selected angle is formed by the inner face of the housing and the inner face of the fastener, the selected angle is unaffected by attachment of the fastener to the article of clothing.
3. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the hinge is formed of an elastomeric material.
4. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the hinge is configured to retain the housing at a plurality of predetermined angles with respect to the fastener, the hinge being unbiased.
5. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the fastener includes an inner face configured to face the body, the housing positionable with respect to the fastener such that the inner face of the housing and the inner face of the fastener form an angle within the range of 150 degrees to 175 degrees.
6. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein at least a portion of the proximal end portion of the fastener is received in the distal end portion of the housing.
7. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the electronic communication unit includes a transmitter configured to wirelessly transmit gait information based on the parameter to the external device.
8. The sensor device of claim 1, wherein the electronic communication unit includes a transceiver configured for bidirectional wireless communication with the external device.
10. The sensor device of claim 9, wherein the sensor unit is repositionable from a first position beneath the insole of the shoe to a second position beneath the insole of the shoe, the second position being different than the first position.
11. The sensor device of claim 9, wherein the transceiver is configured to receive a wireless signal associated with an algorithm for at least one of controlling or monitoring information associated with the gait event, the electronic communication unit including a microcontroller configured to execute the algorithm.
12. The sensor device of claim 9, wherein the fastener is configured to couple the sensor device to the shoe.
13. The sensor device of claim 9, wherein the fastener is configured to couple the electronic communication unit to the shoe, the electronic communication unit being disposed above a rim of the shoe during the gait event.
14. The sensor device of claim 9, wherein the sensor unit is configured to be disposed between the insole and an outsole of the shoe.
16. The sensor device of claim 15, wherein the sensor configured to be disposed beneath an insole of the shoe.
17. The sensor device of claim 15, wherein the fastener is rigidly fixed with respect to the housing such that an angle formed between a face of the housing and a face of the fastener is substantially constant irrespective of a movement of the shoe during the gait event.
18. The sensor device of claim 15, wherein the housing and the fastener are coupled to form an angle within a range of 150 degrees to 175 degrees between the inner face of the housing and a face of the fastener, the face of the fastener facing the body.
19. The sensor device of claim 15, wherein a portion of the proximal end of the fastener is received in the distal end portion of the housing of the electronic communication unit.
20. The sensor device of claim 15, wherein the electronic communication unit includes a transceiver configured to transmit the gait information to the external device and configured to receive a signal from the external device.

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/552,997, filed Oct. 26, 2006 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,632,239 and entitled “Sensor Device for Gait Enhancement,” now U.S. Pat. No. 7,632,239, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. Nos. 60/736,858, filed Nov. 16, 2005, 60/746,060, filed May 1, 2006, and 60/805,359, filed Jun. 21, 2006, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.

The present invention relates to sensor devices for gait enhancement, and more particularly, to such a sensor device having an attachment mechanism for attaching the device to the rim of a shoe.

It is known that various pathologies of the neuromuscular system due to disease or trauma to the central nervous system, such as stroke, spinal cord injury, head injury, cerebral palsy and multiple sclerosis, can impede proper limb functioning of the legs. Gait, the biomechanical description of walking, can suffer static and dynamic parameter variations due to neuromuscular impairments that cause non-symmetrical walking and reduced walking speed and stability, and often require increased energy consumption.

Drop foot describes the gait attributable to weak or uncoordinated activation of the ankle dorsi-flexors due to disease or trauma to the central nervous system. A patient suffering from drop foot tends to drag the foot during the swing phase of walking and usually try to compensate for this dragging by hiking the hip or swinging the affected leg in a circular motion. These patients tend to have impaired stability, are prone to frequent falls, and have walking movements that are unaesthetic and energy consuming.

It is known, however, that functional electrical stimulation (FES) can generally be used to activate the leg muscles of such patients. Precisely timed bursts of short electrical pulses are applied to motor nerves to generate muscle contractions, which are synchronized with the gait of the patient, so as to improve the leg function and enhance the gait.

Commercially available FES devices utilize a sensor, for disposing underneath the foot of the user, to trigger the electrical pulses being applied to the motor nerves. The sensor senses foot rise or foot strike and accordingly triggers the stimulation pulses administered to the motor nerves. The sensor device is physically distinct from the orthosis.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,507,757 to Swain, et al., discloses one typical foot sensor device of the prior art, in which a foot pressure switch, or sensor, is permanently disposed in the shoe of the affected leg. An electrical circuit is interrupted during the stance phase, when a significant weight is placed on the heel, and reconnects when the heel is lifted during the swing phase. Wires disposed under the clothing connect the sensor with an external stimulator unit that can be attached to the belt or kept in a pocket of the user. The stimulator unit is connected to the electrodes by additional electrical wires.

In other FES orthotic devices, the cumbersome wires are obviated by using a radio frequency (RF) system in which the foot sensor device and other components of the FES orthotic device communicate in a wireless fashion. However, the use of such an RF system necessitates integrating an RF transmitting unit, or head, within the foot sensor device. The transmitting unit can be bulky and sensitive to humidity and mechanical stress. Consequently, such transmitting units are typically mounted on and attached to the calf of the patient.

U.S. Design Pat. D494,273 to Haugland, et al., assigned to Neurodan A/S, describes a pressure sensor switch device for placing underneath the foot of the patient. The communication head is held at a predetermined distance from the sensor device by a wide, semi-rigid spine. The device disclosed by Haugland, et al., can be used as a component of the ActiGait® system manufactured by Neurodan A/S. In the ActiGait® system, the pressure sensor device is inserted into a small pouch within a sock, such that upon donning of the sock, the pressure switch is disposed underneath the foot. A substantially non-elastic band is tightened around the calf to secure the RF unit in place against the calf of the impaired leg.

This approach is disadvantageous in that the patient, who is often hemiplegic or may suffer from other disorders, is required to add the donning of an additional item—the sock—to his routine. This unintuitive action is particularly problematic for patients who need or prefer to don the FES orthotic device in an unassisted fashion.

A further disadvantage of this design is that the semi-rigid spine may rub against the foot and heel. Also, the electronic head that houses the RF transceiving unit may rub the ankle or lower calf of the user during the course of gait. Moreover, because the pressure switch and RF transceiving unit are mechanically connected by a wide, at least semi-rigid neck, pressures exerted on the electronic head (e.g., when the head gets caught on, or bumped by, an object during the course of gait), are mechanically translated into forces on the foot sensor. These forces may impede the efficacy and sensitivity of the foot sensor. A further disadvantage lies in the limited ability to adjust the electronic head of the pressure switch to different shoe heights: the electronic head protrudes excessively from low-rimmed shoes, and cannot be fitted to shoes or boots in which the rim is at or above the height of the electronic head.

There is therefore a recognized need for, and it would be highly advantageous to have, a sensor device for neuroprosthetic gait enhancement that overcomes the various deficiencies of the prior art devices. It would be of particular advantage to have such a sensor device that is essentially effortless to don, avoids the discomfort associated with prior art sensor devices, and is secured so as to operate in a safe and robust fashion.

According to the teachings of the present invention there is provided a foot sensor device for gait enhancement, including: (a) a sensor unit having an external casing, the sensor unit for disposing within a shoe of a user, the sensor unit for sensing a parameter associated with a gait event; (b) an electronic communication unit, electrically associated with the sensor unit, for receiving a signal pertaining to the parameter, the electronic unit having: (i) a microcontroller; (ii) a transmitting unit for transmitting, in a wireless fashion, gait information based on the signal, to a unit of an orthosis external to the foot sensor device, and (iii) a housing for housing at least one of the microcontroller and the transmitting unit, and (c) a fastening unit, attached to the housing, the fastening unit adapted to fasten on to the shoe, so as to secure the electronic communication unit in a substantially fixed position during gait of the user.

According to further features in the described preferred embodiments, the fastening unit includes a clamp unit.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the fastening unit is adapted to fasten on to a rim of the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the clamp unit has at least two arms designed and configured to fasten around a rim of the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the clamp unit is at least semi-rigidly associated with the housing.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the clamp unit is rigidly associated with the housing.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the housing of the electronic unit and the external casing of the sensor unit are substantially mechanically independent.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the clamp unit further includes a locking lever adapted for locking the arms in position around the rim of the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, a facing of the housing is concave, so as to fit a natural curvature of a leg of the user.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the housing and the clamp unit each have a face for disposing towards a leg of the user when the user wears the shoe, the device being designed and configured such that the housing and the clamp unit are attached to form an angle within a range of about 150° to about 175° between the faces.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the angle is in a range of about 155° to about 175°.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the angle is in a range of about 160° to about 175°.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments; the angle is in a range of about 160° to about 170°.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the transmitting unit is a transceiving unit.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the device further includes: (d) the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the sensor unit is disposed under an inner sole of the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the fastening unit includes a clamp unit adapted to enable a hemiplegic patient to affix the clamp unit to the shoe, using a single hand.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the housing is a casing.

According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of enhancing gait including the steps of: (a) providing a device including: (i) a sensor unit having an external casing, the sensor unit for disposing within a shoe of a user, the sensor unit for sensing a parameter associated with a gait event; (ii) an electronic communication unit, electrically associated with the sensor unit, for receiving a signal pertaining to the parameter, the electronic unit having: (A) a microcontroller; (B) a transmitting unit for transmitting, in a wireless fashion, gait information based on the signal, to a unit of an orthosis external to the foot sensor device, and (C) a housing for housing at least one of the microcontroller and the transmitting unit, and (iii) a fastening unit, attached to the housing, the fastening unit adapted to fasten on the shoe, so as to secure the electronic communication unit in a substantially fixed position during gait of the user, and (b) donning the device by affixing the fastening unit to the shoe.

According to further features in the described preferred embodiments, the affixing of the fastening unit includes affixing of a clamp unit.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the fastening unit is affixed to a rim of the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the method further includes, prior to step (b), the step of: (c) disposing the sensor unit under an inner sole of the shoe.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the affixing of the fastening unit is effected using a single hand, even by a hemiplegic patient using a single hand.

According to still further features in the described preferred embodiments, the method further includes the step of: (c) locking the arms in position against the rim of the shoe.

The invention is herein described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings. With specific reference now to the drawings in detail, it is stressed that the particulars shown are by way of example and for purposes of illustrative discussion of the preferred embodiments of the present invention only, and are presented in the cause of providing what is believed to be the most useful and readily understood description of the principles and conceptual aspects of the invention. In this regard, no attempt is made to show structural details of the invention in more detail than is necessary for a fundamental understanding of the invention, the description taken with the drawings making apparent to those skilled in the art how the several forms of the invention may be embodied in practice. Throughout the drawings, like-referenced characters are used to designate like elements.

In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the inventive foot sensor device;

FIG. 2 is a schematic, three-dimensional view of the inventive foot sensor device, the sensor unit being disposed underneath the shoe insole, and the communication unit being mounted on the shoe rim;

FIG. 2a is a partial cross-sectional view of a shoe floor, a sensor casing, and a hook and loop system for affixing the casing to the floor;

FIG. 3 is a schematic electronic diagram of the inventive foot sensor device;

FIG. 4 is a perspective side view of the communication unit and the clamp associated therewith, the clamp disposed in an open position;

FIG. 5 is another perspective side view of the communication unit and the clamp associated therewith, the clamp disposed in a closed position;

FIG. 6a is a schematic, three-dimensional view of the inventive foot sensor device mounted on the shoe rim, with the communication head hugging the inner calf of the user, and

FIG. 6b is a top plan view of the device illustrated in FIG. 6a, shown relative to a user's leg.

One embodiment of the present invention is a sensor device for neuroprosthetic gait enhancement, the device designed for facile yet secure attachment to the rim of the user's shoe, even by a hemiplegic user.

Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.

Referring now to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a perspective view of the inventive foot sensor device 100 for a gait-enhancing orthosis. Foot sensor device 100 includes a sensor unit 5 having a sensor casing 10, in which is disposed a sensor element 16, a communication unit 30 enclosed by housing 25, and wiring (wire or cable) 20 for mechanically and electrically connecting sensor element 16 and communication unit 30. Foot sensor device 100 further includes a fastening unit such as clamp unit 40, rigidly or at least semi-rigidly attached to communication unit 30, for attaching communication unit 30 to the user's shoe, and more typically, to the rim of the user's shoe (see FIG. 2 hereinbelow). It should be stressed that sensor element 16 of inventive foot sensor device 100, in contrast to RF-based foot sensor devices of the prior art, is substantially mechanically independent of communication unit 30. The advantages of this attribute are elaborated hereinbelow.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section that follows, the term “substantially mechanically independent” refers to two components, electrically and mechanically connected, and physically set apart from one another, the components having substantially no constraint when moved towards one another. A typical example of such substantially mechanically independent components is communication unit 30 and sensor casing 10, connected by a flexible conductive wire.

Generally in the prior art, the foot pressure switch, or the sensor, is either permanently disposed in the shoe, or disposed in a small pouch of a sock, as in the above-described ActiGait® system. As shown in FIG. 2, by sharp contrast, sensor unit 5 is preferably placed under an inner sole 45 of a shoe 50, beneath the heel area. Sensor casing 10 can be removed or repositioned with facility, by lifting up or removing inner sole 45.

As shown in a cross-sectional view in FIG. 2a, sensor unit 5 may advantageously secured to the floor 55 of the shoe by a hook and loop system 56 such as Velcro®. By way of example, hooks 56a of hook and loop system 56 may be attached to sensor casing 10, and loops 56b may be attached to floor 55. In particular cases, sensor casing 10 may also be positioned under the forefoot area of the shoe.

Casing 10 is configured to protect the inner sensor element against mechanical stress and wetness, and is made of two flexible layers, selected such that the upper layer is more flexible than the lower layer. An additional piece of sponge-like material lies between the internal layer and the sensor, providing additional protection to the sensor. The two layers of sensor casing 10 are attached by various means such as ultrasonic welding, RF welding, gluing, heat welding, or pins. Casing 10 is connected to communication unit 30 by means of wiring 20, which is long enough to enable attachment of communication unit 30 to a rim 48 of shoe 50, irrespective of the height of the shoe rim. It should be noted that when the shoe is not worn, foot sensor device 100 can be left attached to shoe 50, such that the user is not challenged with an additional, cumbersome, and unintuitive doffing action, and in subsequent use, a similarly challenging donning action.

The positioning of communication unit 30 above the rim of shoe 50 protects communication unit 30 from being banged and rubbed by external objects, and from exposure to dirt and moisture. Such positioning may also serve to keep communication unit 30 hidden under the trousers, which is aesthetically desirable and, perhaps more importantly, protects communication unit 30 from being caught or bumped during gait.

Moreover, in foot sensor device 100 of the present invention, the height of communication unit 30 on the leg of the user is substantially fixed with the height of the shoe rim. In the above-referenced design patent to Haugland, et al., by sharp contrast, the distance between the communication unit and the sensor unit is determined by the semi-rigid spine connecting therebetween, such that the height of the communication unit is not adjustable. Consequently, the entire communication unit may not extend over the shoe rim in boots and other high-rimmed shoes, and the communication unit may be disposed at a disadvantageously distance from the shoe rim in low shoes.

Another advantage of the foot sensor device 100 of the present invention is that wiring 20 is thin and is easily contained within the shoe. The wide spine of the device disclosed by Haugland, et al., is bulky, such that the user is subject to the distraction of sensing the spine within the shoe, even to the point of experiencing discomfort.

Perhaps most significantly, foot sensor device 100 may be advantageously fixed to the rim of the shoe in a semi-permanent fashion, i.e., even during those periods in which the user is not undergoing neuroprosthetic gait enhancement. Thus, prior to activating or reactivating the device, no additional donning procedure is required.

FIG. 3 is a schematic electronic diagram of inventive foot sensor device 100. Sensor element 16 is connected to, and preferably powered by, electronics or communication unit 30 by means of wiring 20. Communication unit 30 includes a microcontroller 80, a radio frequency (RF) transceiver 82, and an antenna unit 83 having a matching network for converting the signal from the wired medium to a wireless medium, and from the wireless medium to the wired medium.

The resistance of sensor element 16 changes with the force applied thereon. In order to measure the actual resistance of sensor element 16, foot sensor device 100 is equipped with a voltage divider consisting of sensor element 16 and a bias resistor 81 preferably disposed in unit 30. When a voltage is applied to the voltage divider, the voltage is divided according to the resistance ratio between sensor element 16 and bias resistor 81. This voltage is measured in order to assess the resistance of sensor element 16.

Communication unit 30 is also equipped with a small coin battery 84 that provides power to microcontroller 80, RF transceiver 82, and sensor element 16.

Microcontroller 80 controls and monitor the operation of foot sensor device 100 and executes the algorithms thereof. Preferably, microcontroller 80 communicates with RF transceiver 82 via a Serial Peripheral Interface (SPI).

Referring now to FIGS. 4 and 5, clamp unit 40 is designed for facile and fully reversible attachment and disattachment of communication unit 30 to the rim of a shoe, such that even a hemiplegic patient can perform these functions using a single hand.

Clamp unit 40 includes an external (Le., distal to the shoe) arm or jaw 55, an internal arm or jaw 60 and a locking lever 65 having a fulcrum 70 for closing and locking together jaws 55 and 60. Preferably, when clamp unit 40 is in an open position, jaws 55 and 60 are positioned in a pre-defined angle. The magnitude of this angle is important, since it determines the opening range of the clamp, to fit shoe rims of varying width.

Preferably, arm 55 includes a spring adapted such that clamp unit 40 is in a normally open condition. Preferably, clamp unit 40 is further adapted such that when clamp unit 40 is in the closed position, with no article clamped between jaws 55 and 60, a small gap (typically less than or equal to one millimeter) exists between jaws 55 and 60. This eliminates the need to apply a strong force in opening clamp unit 40.

Teeth 75, disposed on at least one of jaws 55 and 60, ensure a firm grip of clamp unit 40 on the shoe rim, such that clamp unit 40 is inherently adaptable to a wide range of rim thicknesses, contours, and textures. Locking lever 65 serves to fix jaws 55 and 60 to the rim of the shoe.

Internal jaw 60 has a thin profile, such that when disposed inside shoe 50 of the user, internal jaw 60 does not to protrude into the skin of the foot and cause discomfort to the user.

Typically, clamp unit 40 is permanently and rigidly associated with communication unit 30. The connection of clamp unit 40 to communication unit 30 is achieved by an element (not shown) that, from clamp unit 40, extends into communication unit 30 and is secured therein.

It must be emphasized that other embodiments of clamps and fastening units will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, the clamp could have fixed arms that grip the shoe rim by a constant spring force, without an opening and closing mechanism.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section that follows, the term “casing”, with respect to the electronic communication unit, refers to the at least semi-rigid casing enveloping at least a portion of the electronic communication unit.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section that follows, the term “housing” and the like, with respect to the electronic communication unit, is meant to include any rigid or semi-rigid projections of the housing, and is meant to include any elements that are at least semi-rigidly attached to the casing. The term “housing” is specifically meant to include rigid and semi-rigid spines attached to the electronic communication unit, such as the element disclosed in U.S. Design Pat. D494,273 to Haugland, et al.

As used herein in the specification and in the claims section that follows, the term “shoe” is meant to include boots, slippers, sandals having an at least semi-rigid position for fastening the fastening unit. Typically, this at least semi-rigid position is the rim of the shoe. Preferably, the shoe has rigid or at least semi-rigid sole and a covering for firmly containing a foot therein.

FIG. 6a is a schematic, three-dimensional view of the inventive foot sensor device 100 mounted on shoe 50. FIG. 6b is a top plan view of the device illustrated in FIG. 6a, shown relative to a user's leg. These figures collectively show an inner face 58 of housing 25 (of communication unit 30) hugging an inner calf 62 of the user. The surface of the casing has a small, predetermined curvature that is designed to match and hug the natural curvature of the leg, thereby improving comfort and preventing chafing of communication unit 30 against the skin.

Flexibility, or a degree of freedom, with respect to the leg, is imparted to communication unit 30 by the flexibility of the shoe rim.

Alternatively, communication unit 30 may be connected to clamp 40 by means of an elastomeric hinge to allow extra flexibility of the casing of communication unit 30 against the foot. The electronic casing may also include a hinge that allows calibrating the angle of the electronic casing against the foot for personal adjustment with respect to specific users and specific shoe dimensions.

Referring back to FIG. 5, the inner facing 58 of housing 25 and clamp unit 40 (internal arm 60) form an angle of about 165°. After extensive tests were performed on users having widely varying physical characteristics, the inventors discovered that within a narrow range of angles, chafing and pressure of housing 25 against the leg of the user is substantially insignificant. In addition, within this narrow range of angles, housing 25 does not protrude away from the leg in an unreasonable fashion, such that housing 25 is protected from bumping into, or being caught by objects during gait. We have found this narrow range of angles to be between 150° and 175°. More preferably the range of angles is between 155° to 160° and 175°, and most preferably, the range is between 160° and 170°.

Although the invention has been described in conjunction with specific embodiments thereof, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the appended claims.

Bar-Or, Jonathan, Dar, Amit

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10016598, May 01 2006 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Functional electrical stimulation systems
10076656, Nov 16 2005 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Gait modulation system and method
10080885, Nov 16 2005 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Orthosis for a gait modulation system
10086196, Mar 24 2014 Bioness Inc. Systems and apparatus for gait modulation and methods of use
10173060, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Methods for peripheral nerve stimulation
10179238, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems for peripheral nerve stimulation
10543365, May 01 2006 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Functional electrical stimulation systems
10549093, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Method for peripheral nerve stimulation
10561839, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems for peripheral nerve stimulation
10625074, Jan 21 2013 CALA HEALTH, INC Devices and methods for controlling tremor
10765856, Jun 10 2015 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems and methods for peripheral nerve stimulation to treat tremor with detachable therapy and monitoring units
10814130, Jul 08 2016 CALA HEALTH, INC Dry electrodes for transcutaneous nerve stimulation
10850090, Jan 21 2013 CALA HEALTH, INC Devices and methods for controlling tremor
10850098, Mar 24 2014 Bioness Inc. Systems and apparatus for gait modulation and methods of use
10905879, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Methods for peripheral nerve stimulation
10960207, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems for peripheral nerve stimulation
11058867, Nov 16 2005 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Orthosis for a gait modulation system
11077300, Jan 11 2016 Bioness Inc. Systems and apparatus for gait modulation and methods of use
11247048, May 01 2006 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Functional electrical stimulation systems
11331480, Apr 03 2017 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems, methods and devices for peripheral neuromodulation for treating diseases related to overactive bladder
11344722, Jan 21 2016 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems, methods and devices for peripheral neuromodulation for treating diseases related to overactive bladder
11596785, Sep 23 2015 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems and methods for peripheral nerve stimulation in the finger or hand to treat hand tremors
11691009, Mar 24 2014 Bioness Inc. Systems and apparatus for gait modulation and methods of use
11724106, Jan 11 2016 Bioness Inc. Systems and apparatus for gait modulation and methods of use
11857778, Jan 17 2018 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems and methods for treating inflammatory bowel disease through peripheral nerve stimulation
11890468, Oct 03 2019 CALA HEALTH, INC Neurostimulation systems with event pattern detection and classification
11918806, Jan 21 2016 Cala Health, Inc. Systems, methods and devices for peripheral neuromodulation of the leg
8694110, Apr 27 2006 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Orthosis for gait modulation
8788049, May 01 2006 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Functional electrical stimulation systems
8972017, Nov 16 2005 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Gait modulation system and method
9095417, Feb 07 2011 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Adjustable orthosis for electrical stimulation of a limb
9333345, Oct 03 2013 ENSIL CANADA; FLASHFORWARD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC ; Ensilver Canada Electrical stimulation for a functional electrical stimulation system
9364657, Oct 31 2014 ENSIL CANADA; FLASHFORWARD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC ; Ensilver Canada Cuff unit for a functional electrical stimulation system
9375569, Oct 03 2013 ENSIL CANADA; FLASHFORWARD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC ; Ensilver Canada Controller unit for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) orthotic system
9375570, Oct 03 2013 ENSIL CANADA; FLASHFORWARD MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES INC ; Ensilver Canada Sensor unit for a functional electrical stimulation (FES) orthotic system
9415205, May 01 2006 Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd. Functional electrical stimulation systems
9687695, Oct 22 2014 Dalsu, Lee Methods and systems for training proper running of a user
9802041, Jun 02 2014 CALA HEALTH, INC Systems for peripheral nerve stimulation to treat tremor
9867985, Mar 24 2014 BIONESS INC Systems and apparatus for gait modulation and methods of use
Patent Priority Assignee Title
3204637,
3881496,
3941137, Feb 27 1971 HONEYWELL B V AMSTERDAM,A SUBSIDIARY OF THE NETHERLANDS OF HONEYWELL INC A DE CORP Ambulatory stimulator
4558704, Dec 15 1983 Wright State University Hand control system
4580569, Dec 15 1983 Wright State University Apparatus and method for muscle stimulation
4647918, Jan 16 1985 Multi-event notification system for monitoring critical pressure points on persons with diminished sensation of the feet
4745930, Oct 16 1986 Chattanooga Corporation Force sensing insole for electro-goniometer
5167229, Mar 24 1986 Case Western Reserve University Functional neuromuscular stimulation system
5253654, Apr 30 1992 Orthopedic weight monitor
5323650, Jan 14 1993 Fullen Systems, LLC System for continuously measuring forces applied to the foot
5330516, Mar 28 1991 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Device for generating hand function
5350414, Dec 10 1991 Electro Science Technologies, Inc. Local application microprocessor based nerve and muscle stimulator
5357696, May 01 1992 Device for measuring force applied to a wearer's foot
5408873, Jul 25 1994 Cleveland Medical Devices, Inc. Foot force sensor
5487759, Jun 14 1993 DJO, LLC Nerve stimulating device and associated support device
5540735, Dec 12 1994 Encore Medical Asset Corporation Apparatus for electro-stimulation of flexing body portions
5562707, Oct 13 1993 University of Alberta Garment for applying controlled electrical stimulation to restore motor function
5566479, Mar 21 1995 Shoe contruction for use by diabetic persons
5643332, Sep 20 1995 NEUROMOTION INC Assembly for functional electrical stimulation during movement
5664346, May 04 1994 Portable footwear illuminated
5738432, Dec 04 1996 Illumination device and a method
5748845, Jul 31 1995 Motorola, Inc FES method and system for controlling the movement of a limb
5775332, Jul 01 1992 PREVENTIVE MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC Capacitive biofeedback sensor with resilient polyurethane dielectric for rehabilation
5814093, Sep 20 1995 BIOMOTION LTD Assembly for functional electrical stimulation during movement
5861017, Jun 06 1997 Shriners Hospitals for Children Portable functional electrical stimulation (FES) system for upper or lower extremity applications
5916159, Jul 28 1995 UNILEAD INTERNATIONAL, INC Electrode equipped electro-dermal device
5940980, Jun 02 1997 Hands-free hair dryer
5976094, Jul 01 1997 NeuroMetrix, Inc. Apparatus and methods for assessment of neuromuscular function
5980472, Feb 20 1998 BROWN MEDICAL INDUSTRIES, INC Joint movement monitoring system
6125513, Nov 29 1999 Motorola Multifunctional belt clip for a portable device
6126355, Aug 31 1998 Otto Bock, U.S., Inc. Fastener for adjustable support device
6174294, Aug 03 1995 SIERRA NEVADA COMPANY, LLC Limb load monitor
6195921, Sep 28 1999 Vinncente Hoa Gia, Truong Virtual intelligence shoe with a podiatric analysis system
6233476, May 18 1999 ST JUDE MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL HOLDING S À R L Medical positioning system
6246863, Nov 28 1997 Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH Avalanche transceiver
6261247, Dec 31 1998 BALL SEMICONDUCTOR, INC Position sensing system
6282448, Jun 10 1998 DK ELECTRONICS, LLC Self applied and self adjusting device and method for prevention of deep vein thrombosis with movement detection
6349126, Apr 14 2000 Omron Corporation Pedometer capable of keeping user interested in exercise
6379313, Jul 01 1997 NeuroMetrix, Inc. Methods for the assessment of neuromuscular function by F-wave latency
6456884, Mar 28 1997 KENNEY, JOHN Orthotic/electrotherapy for treating contractures due to immobility
6456885, Mar 29 1999 UNIVERSITY, KURUME Apparatus for strengthening muscles
6507757, Jun 20 2000 BOUMEMOUTH UNIVERSITY HIGHER EDUCATION CORP; SALISBURY HEALTHCARE NHS TRUST Apparatus for electrical stimulation of the body
6516500, Jun 07 2000 First Create Co., Ltd. Plastic clipping device
6564103, Dec 01 2000 Visionquest Industries, Inc.; VISIONQUEST INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED Electrical stimulator and method of use
6578745, Nov 28 2001 Taylor Brands, LLC Removable belt clip
6651352, Jan 04 2002 BI-STATE INVESTMENT GROUP 1, LLC Wrist motion measurement device
6752299, Dec 07 2001 MEDTRONIC MINIMED, INC Rotational holster for an electronic device
6829510, Dec 18 2001 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Surface neuroprosthetic device having an internal cushion interface system
6955279, Dec 04 2002 Garmin Ltd. Carrying assembly and method for securement of electronic devices
6978684, Nov 10 2003 NIKE, Inc Apparel that dynamically, consciously, and/or reflexively affects subject performance
7047827, May 02 2005 DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES IP LIMITED Folding digital scale
7146220, Sep 30 2001 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Device for muscle stimulation
7162305, Oct 23 2002 The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Functional electrical stimulation system
7174607, Sep 30 2002 Precision Dynamics Corporation Card attachment
7200517, Oct 02 1997 NIKE, Inc Monitoring activity of a user in locomotion on foot
7337007, Dec 18 2001 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Surface neuroprosthetic device having a locating system
7403821, Feb 17 2000 NEURODAN A S Method and implantable systems for neural sensing and nerve stimulation
7410471, Sep 18 1998 Becker Orthopedic Appliance Company Orthosis knee joint and sensor
7416537, Jun 23 1999 IZEX Technologies, Inc. Rehabilitative orthoses
7537573, Nov 25 2002 ALTERG, INC Active muscle assistance and resistance device and method
7632239, Nov 16 2005 BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD Sensor device for gait enhancement
7713217, Jun 27 2001 Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Torque imparting system
7785279, Aug 21 2003 CYBERDYNE INC Wearable action-assist device, and method and program for controlling wearable action-assist device
20030083596,
20030110595,
20030114892,
20040011366,
20040122483,
20040133081,
20040147975,
20040173220,
20040243197,
20040249316,
20040254624,
20050043660,
20050049652,
20050085704,
20050131317,
20050261609,
20060015470,
20060211956,
20060282017,
20060282018,
20070021689,
20070112394,
20070123756,
20070179560,
20070203533,
20080140154,
20080319349,
20090069865,
20090177131,
20110137375,
D494273, Sep 19 2002 NEURODAN A S A DANISH COMPANY Pressure sensor
EP1508302,
JP1985119949,
JP1994501854,
JP2002191580,
JP2004215735,
JP2004313555,
JP2004503266,
JP2005514143,
////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Oct 23 2006DAR, AMITN E S S NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEMS LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0241750208 pdf
Oct 23 2006BAR-OR, JONATHANN E S S NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEMS LTD ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0241750208 pdf
Jan 28 2008N E S S NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTRICAL STIMULATION SYSTEMS LTD BIONESS NEUROMODULATION LTD CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0241750288 pdf
Dec 04 2009Bioness Neuromodulation Ltd.(assignment on the face of the patent)
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Aug 11 2016M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Aug 13 2020M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.
Aug 26 2024M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Feb 26 20164 years fee payment window open
Aug 26 20166 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 26 2017patent expiry (for year 4)
Feb 26 20192 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Feb 26 20208 years fee payment window open
Aug 26 20206 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 26 2021patent expiry (for year 8)
Feb 26 20232 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Feb 26 202412 years fee payment window open
Aug 26 20246 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Feb 26 2025patent expiry (for year 12)
Feb 26 20272 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)