A method and device for controlled damping of a vehicle stores a set of controller parameters R1 to Rn for controlling the damping of the unloaded vehicle as a function of the dynamic driving situation thereof 1 to n, detect a loading condition b of the vehicle, adapt the set of controller parameters R1 to Rn as a function of the detected loading condition b to a set of controlled parameters R1b to Rnb, and dams the vehicle as a function of the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb as a function of the dynamic driving situation thereon 1 to n.
|
8. A method for controlled damping of a vehicle, the method comprising the acts of:
storing a set of controller parameters R1 to Rn for controlling damping of an unloaded vehicle as a function of the dynamic driving situation 1 to n of the vehicle;
detecting a loading condition b of the vehicle;
adapting the set of controller parameters R1 to Rn as a function of the detected loading condition b to a set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb; and
damping the vehicle as a function of the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb as a function of the dynamic driving situation 1 to n of the vehicle;
wherein, during the storing act, at least two sets of controller parameters R1k1 to Rnk1 and R1k2 to Rnk2 for different comfort modes k1, k2 of the unloaded vehicle, and either, for each set, a set of controller parameters R1bk1 to RnBk1 and R1bk2 to RnBk2 for the fully loaded vehicle or a single set of controller parameters R1b to RnB for the fully loaded vehicle, are stored; and
wherein, during the adapting act, the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb is determined by a driver pre-selection of one of a plurality of different comfort modes and a mathematical interpolation between the thereby selected set of controller parameters for the unloaded vehicle and the pertaining or single set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
1. A device for controlled damping of a vehicle, the device comprising:
a storage unit for storing a set of controller parameters R1 to Rn for controlling damping of an unloaded vehicle as a function of a dynamic driving situation 1 to n of the vehicle;
a detecting unit for detecting a loading condition b of the vehicle;
an adaptation unit for adapting the set of controller parameters R1 to Rn as a function of the detected loading condition b to a set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb; and
a damper for damping the vehicle as a function of the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb as a function of the dynamic driving situation 1 to n, wherein:
the storage unit adjusts for storing at least two sets of controller parameters R1k1 to Rnk1 and R1k2 to Rnk2 for different comfort modes k1, k2 of the unloaded vehicle,
the storage unit adjusts either for storing for each set a set of controller parameters R1bk1 to RnBk1 and R1bk2 to RnBk2 for a fully loaded vehicle or a single set of controller parameters R1b to RnB for the fully loaded vehicle,
the adaptation unit adjusts for determining the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb by a driver pre-selection of one of a plurality of different comfort modes and a mathematical interpolation between the thereby selected set of controller parameters for the unloaded vehicle and the pertaining or single set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
2. The device according to
3. The device according to
4. The device according to
5. The device according to
6. The device according to
7. The device according to
9. The method according to
taking into account an increased basic damping of the vehicle with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
10. The method according to
taking into account an increased damping against at least one of a lifting, a pitching, and a rolling of the vehicle with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
11. The method according to
taking into account an increased damping of the rearward structure of the vehicle with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
12. The method according to
taking into account an increased damping against at least one of a lifting, a pitching, and a rolling of the vehicle with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
13. The method according to
taking into account an increased damping of the rearward structure of the vehicle with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
14. The method according to
taking into account an increased damping of the rearward structure of the vehicle with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
|
This application is a continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/EP2010/001943, filed Mar. 27, 2010, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 from German Patent Application No. DE 10 2009 021 671.5, filed May 16, 2009, the entire disclosures of which are herein expressly incorporated by reference.
The invention relates to a device and a method for the controlled damping of the body movement as well as the wheel movement of a vehicle as a function of its dynamic driving situation.
In such a case, by preselecting different comfort and damping modes, the driver of the vehicle should especially be able to cause the vehicle, for example, in the “comfort mode”, to have a soft comfortable damping of the vehicle body with respect to the vehicle wheels, while, in the case of a “standard” adjustment, a normal damping will be present. And, in a “sporty” mode, a hard to extremely hard damping will be provided. The different damping is carried out particularly by way of controlled adjusting damper systems arranged between the vehicle body and the wheels.
Such a control of the damping of a vehicle as a function of different preselected comfort modes is known from German Patent document 100 33 770 A1. Furthermore, reference is made to German Patent document DE 42 12 852 A1, which describes a wheel suspension system of a motor vehicle with a damping controlled as a function of the dynamic driving situation and of the loading condition of the vehicle.
Such systems change the damping particularly depending on the driving situation of the vehicle and thereby provide a particularly high comfort level while high dynamics of vehicle handling are simultaneously preserved. Known devices for the controlled changing of the damping of a vehicle operate by using a fixed set of parameters which covers all dynamic driving situations.
In particular, in the case of vehicles cushioned by steel springs in connection with a high load, the very high definition of comfort may then result in the occurrence of a “bottoming” of the wheels. This means that the damping is not sufficient, that instead the entire spring travel is used up and that the wheel suspension strikes hard against the vehicle body. On the one hand, this can be felt and heard by the vehicle occupants and clearly reduces comfort. On the other hand, the bottoming may also lead to damage to the participating components.
This problem can be remedied if, besides depending on the dynamic driving situation as such, additionally the loading of the vehicle is taken into account when adjusting or controlling the damping. In this sense, the above-mentioned German Patent document DE 42 12 852 A1 describes a vehicle in the case of which so-called characteristic damping force values are changed by several steps from a soft to a hard adjustment if the loading capacity of the vehicle exceeds a predefined value. However, this basically known approach cannot simply be taken over for existing control concepts with a damping that is variable as a function of the dynamic driving situation because this would result in a significant limitation of the variable damping that, as desired, is adapted as finely as possible for different dynamic driving situations.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide a device and a method for the automatically controlled or controlled damping of a vehicle, in the case of which also at a high or different loading of the vehicle, a comfortable damping in all conditions of driving dynamics will be ensured in a favorable manner.
According to the invention, this and other objects are achieved by a device and method for the controlled damping of a vehicle, having a storage unit for storing a set of controller parameters R1 to Rn for controlling the damping of the unloaded vehicle as a function of its dynamic driving situation 1 to n, a detecting unit for detecting a loading condition b of the vehicle, an adaptation unit for adapting the set of controller parameters R1 to Rn as a function of the detected loading condition b to a set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb, and a damper for damping the vehicle as a function of the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb as a function of its dynamic driving situation 1 to n. The storage unit is adjusted for storing at least two sets of controller parameters R1k1 to Rnk1 and R1k2 to Rnk2 for different comfort modes k1, k2 of the unloaded vehicle, and is adjusted either for storing for each set a set of controller parameters R1Bk1 to RnBk1 and R1Bk2 to RnBk2 for the fully loaded vehicle or a single set of controller parameters R1B to RnB for the fully loaded vehicle. Furthermore, the adaptation unit is adjusted for determining the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb by a selection of the comfort mode and a mathematical interpolation between the thereby selected set of controller parameters for the unloaded vehicle and the pertaining or single set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
In the present case, a device for the controlled damping of a vehicle is provided which comprises a storage unit for storing a set of controller parameters R1 to Rn for controlling the damping of the unloaded vehicle as a function of its dynamic driving situation 1 to n (in which case n is a natural number greater than 1), a detecting unit for detecting a loading condition b of the vehicle, an adaptation unit for adapting the set of controller parameters R1 to Rn as a function of the detected loading condition b to a set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb, and a damper for damping the vehicle as a function of the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb as a function of its dynamic driving situation 1 to n.
It was recognized that a very large number of possible influence factors would always have to be taken into account when damping a vehicle. In addition to the actual dynamic driving situation, such influence factors are, for example, a driving speed not appropriate for the base surface, the wind pressure at the vehicle, different tire pressures, the driver's steering behavior and much more. Although it would be technically feasible to take all theses factors into account, in view of the costs, the resulting product would not be marketable. In contrast, according to the invention, the loading condition of the vehicle was selected as the single additional factor that is taken into account for the damping of the vehicle in addition to the dynamic driving situation. In this manner, the solution according to the invention creates in a cost-effective and simultaneously considerably more comfortable damping. The invention thereby additionally utilizes the technique of and the experience with existing systems in that the starting point is the currently used set of controller parameters R1 to Rn for the unloaded vehicle. This set of controller parameters is only changed in the direction of a detected loading condition of the vehicle. Systems existing at the vehicle can be advantageously used also for detecting the loading condition. Particularly in the case of steel-spring-cushioned vehicles, level sensors and, in the case of air-suspended vehicles, pressure sensors are advantageously queried, or a combination of such test signals is analyzed. It is an advantage that, as a rule, at least the level sensors in the corresponding vehicles are part of the standard equipment, so that no additional costs will arise.
In a first embodiment of the device according to the invention, the storage unit is adjusted for storing at least two sets of controller parameters R1k1 to Rnk1 and R1k2 to Rnk2 for different comfort modes k1, k2 of the unloaded vehicle, and adjusted for storing for each set a set of controller parameters R1Bk1 to RnBk1 and R1Bk2 to RnBk2 for the fully loaded vehicle, and the adaptation unit is adjusted for determining the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb by means of a selection of the comfort mode and a mathematical interpolation between the thereby selected set of controller parameters for the unloaded vehicle and the pertaining set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
By way of this first embodiment, a functionally optimal solution is created which, however, still requires comparatively high expenditures with respect to data handling, thus the storage and processing of the stored data. In the case of this approach, the sets of controller parameters are doubled, one parameter set being provided for the unloaded and one parameter set being provided for the loaded vehicle condition. The parameter set used for the actual controlling is calculated from these two sets while taking the actual loading condition into account. A storing of intermediately stored data sets requiring much higher expenditures is thereby eliminated. In particular, an adjustable, partly linear interpolation is used as the calculating method.
In a second embodiment of the device according to the invention, the storage unit is adjusted for storing at least two sets of controller parameters R1k1 to Rnk1 and R1k2 to Rnk2 for different comfort modes k1, k2 of the unloaded vehicle, and adjusted for storing a single set of controller parameters R1B to RnB for the fully loaded vehicle, and the adaptation unit is adjusted for determining the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb by means of a selection of the comfort mode and a mathematical interpolation between the thereby selected set of controller parameters for the unloaded vehicle and the single set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
By way of this second embodiment, the required storage space can be further reduced. Furthermore, the pertaining damping system can be coordinated more easily with the only one parameter set for the fully loaded condition. A coordination with three different modes for the fully loaded condition is, however, eliminated. This embodiment nevertheless meets the requirements of “preventing a bottoming” and of “increasing the driving comfort.” Low application expenditures and a storage-space-saving presentation justify the possibly resulting compromises with respect to the achieved driving comfort.
For the further reduction of the required storage space, in the case of the device according to the invention, the storage unit is adjusted for storing at least two sets of controller parameters R1k1 to Rnk1 and R1k2 to Rnk2 for different comfort modes k1, k2 of the unloaded vehicle, of which one set is designed for a maximally hard damping of the vehicle, and the adaptation unit is adjusted for determining the set of controller parameters R1b to Rnb by means of a selection of the comfort mode and a mathematical interpolation between the thereby selected set of controller parameters for the unloaded vehicle and the set of controller parameters for the maximally hard damping of the vehicle.
This further development is based on the circumstance that, in the case of relevant vehicles, a maximally hard damping is designed in the “sporty” mode in which, if possible, no “bottoming” will occur even if the vehicle is fully loaded. This type of design of the maximally hard damping is now, according to the invention, utilized as a maximal parameter set also for the remaining comfort modes, such as “comfort” and “standard” with regard to a fully loaded vehicle in these modes. Therefore, no separately generated parameter set for the “fully loaded vehicle” condition is necessary in the memory.
In an advantageous further development of the device according to the invention, an intensified basic damping of the vehicle is taken into account with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle.
This further development is based on a derivation from the active physical chain as the loading of a vehicle increases. The additional loading results in a displacement of the center of gravity and in an increase in mass, to which a reaction according to the invention takes place, as explained above.
In an additional advantageous further development of the device according to the invention, an increased damping against a lifting, pitching and/or rolling of the vehicle is taken into account with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle. Such an adjustment of the controller parameters acts especially against the increase in mass at the vehicle when the latter is loaded.
In yet another advantageous further development of the device according to the invention, an increased damping of the rearward structure of the vehicle is taken into account with each set of controller parameters for the fully loaded vehicle. This further development is based on the recognition that, with an additional load, in the case of known vehicles, as a rule, their center of gravity is displaced toward the rear and, as a result, the distribution of the weight to the front and the rear axle also changes.
According to the invention, this object is further achieved correspondingly by a method for the controlled damping of a vehicle. The further developments explained for the device also exist analogously for this method.
By means of the solution according to the invention and its further developments, a “bottoming” of the wheels can be prevented or at least reduced or lessened in all operating conditions of a vehicle. Particularly in the case of vehicles without a level control system, the vibration comfort is considerably increased in a cost-effective manner. Damage to components, such as axles, springs, dampers as well as their connection to the vehicle body, can be reduced. The service life of such components is thereby lengthened. Finally, the manufacturing costs of pertaining axle systems, as a whole, can also be reduced because the components can be constructed in such a manner that a lower collective load is adhered to.
Other objects, advantages and novel features of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of one or more preferred embodiments when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
The loading of the vehicle is determined on the device 10 by a detecting unit 24, which detects the loading condition of the vehicle. In this case, the actual loading b of the vehicle will, as a rule, be below the maximally permissible loading B of the fully loaded vehicle. The detection unit 24 therefore determines the actually prevailing loading condition of the vehicle.
Furthermore, a preselecting switch 26 is provided on the vehicle, by means of which switch 26, the driver of the vehicle can preset in which comfort mode he wants to drive the vehicle; thus, whether he wants to select the “sporty” comfort mode, the “normal” comfort mode or the “comfort” comfort mode, so that the vehicle will correspondingly be spring-cushioned and damped in a sporty, normal or more comfort-oriented manner with respect to its dynamic driving behavior.
The preselection of the comfort mode and the loading condition of the vehicle are taken into account at an adaptation unit 28 for adapting the relevant set of controller parameters R1 to Rn. In the embodiment according to
In
At a damper 30 according to
The foregoing disclosure has been set forth merely to illustrate the invention and is not intended to be limiting. Since modifications of the disclosed embodiments incorporating the spirit and substance of the invention may occur to persons skilled in the art, the invention should be construed to include everything within the scope of the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
Meske, Alexander, Froehlich, Martin, Proemm, Uwe
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10036443, | Mar 19 2009 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Methods and apparatus for suspension adjustment |
10040329, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10047817, | Jan 07 2009 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10060499, | Jan 07 2009 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10072724, | Aug 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension lock out and signal generation |
10086670, | Sep 12 2011 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension set up |
10086892, | Jul 02 2010 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Lever assembly for positive lock adjustable seat post |
10094443, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Bypass for a suspension damper |
10145435, | Mar 19 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension adjustment |
10160511, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10330171, | May 10 2012 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10336148, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10336149, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10400847, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Compression isolator for a suspension damper |
10406883, | Oct 13 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for controlling a fluid damper |
10414236, | Mar 19 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for selective spring pre-load adjustment |
10415662, | Jan 20 2010 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Remotely operated bypass for a suspension damper |
10443671, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Remotely operated bypass for a suspension damper |
10472013, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Seat post |
10537790, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for virtual competition |
10550909, | Aug 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension lock out and signal generation |
10591015, | Mar 19 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension adjustment |
10670106, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10677309, | May 31 2011 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for position sensitive suspension damping |
10697514, | Jan 20 2010 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Remotely operated bypass for a suspension damper |
10723409, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10731724, | Oct 13 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Suspension system |
10737546, | Apr 08 2016 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Electronic compression and rebound control |
10759247, | Sep 12 2011 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension set up |
10781879, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Bypass for a suspension damper |
10800220, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10807433, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10814689, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10821795, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
10843753, | Jul 02 2010 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Lever assembly for positive lock adjustable seat post |
10859133, | May 10 2012 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11021204, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Seat post |
11043294, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factoory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for virtual competition |
11162555, | Aug 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension lock out and signal generation |
11168758, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11173765, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11257582, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for virtual competition |
11279198, | Oct 13 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for controlling a fluid damper |
11279199, | Jan 25 2012 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Suspension damper with by-pass valves |
11299233, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11306798, | May 09 2008 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Position sensitive suspension damping with an active valve |
11408482, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Bypass for a suspension damper |
11413924, | Mar 19 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for selective spring pre-load adjustment |
11472252, | Apr 08 2016 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Electronic compression and rebound control |
11499601, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Remotely operated bypass for a suspension damper |
11519477, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Compression isolator for a suspension damper |
11549565, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11619278, | Mar 19 2009 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Methods and apparatus for suspension adjustment |
11629774, | May 10 2012 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11655873, | Mar 19 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension adjustment |
11660924, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11708878, | Jan 20 2010 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Remotely operated bypass for a suspension damper |
11760150, | Jan 25 2012 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Suspension damper with by-pass valves |
11794543, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11796028, | May 31 2011 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for position sensitive suspension damping |
11859690, | Oct 13 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Suspension system |
11866110, | Jul 02 2010 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Lever assembly for positive lock adjustable seat post |
11866120, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11869651, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for virtual competition |
11875887, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for virtual competition |
11890908, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
11897571, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Seat post |
11920655, | Mar 19 2009 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Methods and apparatus for suspension adjustment |
11958328, | Sep 12 2011 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension set up |
11961602, | Nov 25 2008 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for virtual competition |
11976706, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Remotely operated bypass for a suspension damper |
12091122, | Jan 07 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Method and apparatus for an adjustable damper |
12103349, | Mar 19 2009 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for selective spring pre-load adjustment |
8838335, | Sep 12 2011 | FOX FACTORY, INC | Methods and apparatus for suspension set up |
9278598, | Sep 12 2011 | Fox Factory, Inc. | Methods and apparatus for suspension set up |
9908380, | Jan 28 2015 | GM Global Technology Operations LLC | Method for operating a motor vehicle, computer software product, chassis arrangement and motor vehicle |
ER1070, | |||
ER2184, | |||
ER2643, | |||
ER2891, |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5157609, | Jul 05 1989 | DR ING H C F PORSCHE AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT COMPANY NUMBER 722287 | Method and apparatus for controlling an automatically shifting transmission |
5200895, | Dec 13 1989 | ATSUGI UNISIA CORPORATION, 1370, ONNA, ATSUGI-SHI, KANAGAWA-KEN, JAPAN | Automotive suspension system with enhanced response characteristics |
5584498, | Oct 15 1992 | Yamaha Hatsudoki Kabushiki Kaisha | Suspension system for vehicle |
5839082, | Dec 26 1995 | Unisia Jecs Corporation | Apparatus and method for controlling damping force characteristic of vehicular shock absorber |
5841201, | Feb 29 1996 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Hybrid vehicle drive system having a drive mode using both engine and electric motor |
6285935, | Aug 05 1999 | Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha | Device for controlling suspension shock absorbers of vehicles with skewed phantom substitute |
6721641, | Jul 05 1999 | ADVANCED MOTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC | Electromagnetic damper for vehicle suspension |
7076351, | Nov 11 1998 | KOLDEWAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE KENMAR COMPANY TRUST, MARY KAY; KENMAR COMPANY TRUST, THE | Enhanced computer optimized adaptive suspension system and method |
7197384, | Dec 23 2002 | DaimlerChrysler AG | Regulatable spring-and-damper system in a vehicle |
7949445, | Sep 22 2005 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles SA | Suspension control device, vehicle comprising said device, production and associated program |
8032282, | Dec 21 2007 | Aisin Seiki Kabushiki Kaisha | Damping characteristics control apparatus for a vehicle suspension |
8060277, | Sep 22 2005 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles SA | Suspension control device, vehicle comprising said device, production method thereof and associated program |
20040119250, | |||
20080243336, | |||
20090037051, | |||
20090099727, | |||
20100138108, | |||
20100292894, | |||
20110160960, | |||
20120041643, | |||
20120062375, | |||
DE10033770, | |||
DE10257008, | |||
DE19922745, | |||
DE4039839, | |||
DE4212852, | |||
DE4436441, | |||
EP237919, | |||
JP281710, | |||
JP550822, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Sep 27 2011 | PROEMM, UWE | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027688 | /0834 | |
Sep 27 2011 | MESKE, ALEXANDER | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027688 | /0834 | |
Sep 28 2011 | FROEHLICH, MARTIN | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 027688 | /0834 | |
Oct 26 2011 | Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Oct 11 2016 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 24 2020 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 04 2024 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 16 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 16 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 16 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 16 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 16 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 16 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 16 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 16 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |