A signal transmission system (STS) comprises a transmitter (T) with a first lc circuit comprising a first coil (C1) intended to be fed with signals having a chosen carrier frequency, and a receiver (R) with a second lc circuit comprising a second coil (C2) and coupled to a circuit front-end (FE). The first coil (C1) is arranged to transfer energy to the second coil (C2) by magnetic induction in a near-field propagation mode. The first lc circuit (C1) has an increased quality factor and is tuned to a first frequency which is shifted in a first direction from the carrier frequency by a first value, and the second lc circuit (C2) has an increased quality factor and is tuned to a second frequency which is shifted in a second direction, opposite to the first one, from the carrier frequency by a second value.
|
1. Signal transmission system, comprising
a transmitter with a first lc circuit comprising a first coil intended to be fed with signals having a chosen carrier frequency, and
a receiver with a second lc circuit comprising a second coil and coupled to a circuit front-end,
said first coil being arranged to transfer energy to said second coil by magnetic induction in a near-field propagation mode,
characterized in that said first lc circuit has an increased quality factor and is tuned to a first center frequency which is shifted in a first direction from said carrier frequency, by a first value, and said second lc circuit has an increased quality factor and is tuned to a second center frequency which is shifted in a second direction, opposite to the first one, from said carrier frequency, by a second value.
2. Signal transmission system according to
3. Signal transmission system according to
4. Signal transmission system according to
5. Signal transmission system according to
6. Signal transmission system according to
7. Signal transmission system according to
8. Signal transmission system according to
9. Signal transmission system according to
10. Signal transmission system according to
11. Signal transmission system according to
12. Signal transmission system according to
13. Signal transmission system according to
14. Signal transmission system according to
15. Wireless communication equipment, characterized in that it comprises a transmitter and/or a receiver of a signal transmission system according to
|
The present invention relates to systems intended for signal transmission by magnetic induction in near-field propagation mode.
One means here by “signal transmission system” a system comprising a transmitter with a circuit driver intended to be fed with signals having a chosen carrier frequency and feeding a first transmitting antenna coil, and a distant receiver with a second receiving antenna coil coupled to a circuit front-end, the first coil being arranged to transfer energy to the second coil by magnetic induction in a near-field propagation mode.
As it is known to those skilled in the art, magnetic induction is one of the technologies used to transmit signals between a transmitter and a receiver, which are parts of some wireless communication equipments, for instance.
The magnetic induction is based on the generation of a quasi-static magnetic field component by a first coil of a transmitter, through which is flowing a variable (sinusoidal) current representative of information to be transmitted. When a second coil of a distant receiver intercepts this generated magnetic field, a modulated current representative of the transmitted signals is induced into its winding.
The magnetic field generated by a current loop (or loop antenna) can be divided into three basic terms: one radiation term proportional to r−1 (where r is the distance from the current loop), which represents the flow of energy away from coil, one term proportional to r−2, and finally one quasi-stationary term proportional to r−1.
When the distance between the transmitter and the receiver is small, i.e. when it is smaller than λ/2π (where λ is the wavelength corresponding to the signal frequency), the field propagation is called “near-field mode”. In this mode the quasi-stationary term (1/r3) dominates and is the major contributor. This 1/r3 term is independent of frequency, which implies that it can be employed at any frequency in the near-field mode, for given coil and current, to generate a specified magnetic field at the level of the receiver. So, in the near-field mode, the magnetic field properties are essentially determined by the first coil characteristics, and the electric field is much more weaker than the magnetic field.
In the near-field mode, once the system operating carrier frequency and bandwidth are selected, the transmitter and receiver antenna designs can be optimized independently, with their own constraints of power consumption, size and other design considerations.
In most of the signal transmission systems of the art, the first (transmit) coil is put in resonance with a capacitor with which it forms a LC tank (also called “transmitting (TX) LC circuit”). This decreases the amplitude of the current which drives the antenna (driver current) and reach the required coil current. In receive mode, the circuit front-end being a voltage detector, the induced voltage must be maximized. This can be done by putting the second (receive) coil in resonance with a capacitor with which it forms another LC tank (also called “receiving (RX) LC circuit”).
The TX LC circuit and the RX LC circuit are both tuned to the operating carrier frequency and have both a low quality factor (Q) to pass the majority of the signals through them.
One can show that this antenna tuning is not optimal in terms of power consumption of the transmitter.
Therefore, it is an object of the invention to improve on the known art, and to more precisely provide for a signal transmission system having a new antenna tuning allowing a link budget optimization.
For this purpose, it provides a signal transmission system comprising classically a transmitter with a first (TX) LC circuit comprising a first coil and a receiver with a second (RX) LC circuit comprising a second coil and coupled to a circuit front-end, the first coil being arranged to transfer energy to the second coil by magnetic induction in a near-field propagation mode.
This signal transmission system is characterized in that its first LC circuit has an increased quality factor and is tuned to a first frequency which is shifted by a first value, in a first direction, from the operating carrier frequency, and its second LC circuit has also an increased quality factor and is tuned to a second frequency which is shifted by a second value, in a second direction opposite to the first one, from the carrier frequency.
The increase of the quality factor value must be considered in comparison with the low value which is generally used in the art.
The signal transmission system according to the invention may include additional characteristics considered separately or combined, and notably:
The invention also provides a wireless communication equipment comprising a transmitter and/or a receiver of a signal transmission system such as the one above introduced.
Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent on examining the detailed specifications hereafter and the appended drawings, wherein:
The appended drawings may not only serve to complete the invention, but also to contribute to its definition, if need be.
Reference is initially made to
A signal transmission system STS comprises a transmitter T arranged for transmitting radio signals and a receiver R arranged for receiving the radio signals transmitted by a transmitter T. In the non limiting example illustrated in
In the following description it will be considered that the first E1 and second E2 equipments are bidirectional wireless communication equipments, such as wireless telephones and hearing devices. But it is important to notice that the invention is not limited to this type of wireless communication equipment. It applies to any type of wireless communication equipment, and notably to laptops or personal digital assistants (PDAs), provided with a radio communication module, and to telemetry equipments such as wireless body sensors.
In case where the first E1 and second E2 equipments are bidirectional wireless communication equipments they both comprise a transmitter T and a receiver R, or a transceiver acting as a transmitter T and a receiver R.
As schematically illustrated in
The antenna driver CD receives signals having a chosen operating carrier frequency Fe and excites the first LC (resonant) circuit. According to the invention, the first LC circuit has an increased quality factor Q and is tuned to a first frequency F1 which is shifted in a first direction from the operating carrier frequency Fc by a first value δ1. So, F1=Fc+/−δ1. In the preceding relation the first direction is represented by the sign + or −.
For instance, the first value δ1 is contained between 10 kHz and 200 kHz, and preferably between 140 kHz and 180 kHz. The first value δ1 depends on the quality factor Q considered and the signal modulation used. For instance, if one uses a FSK modulation the first value δ1 can be chosen equal to 150 kHz. But it could be also chosen equal to 175 kHz.
One means here by “an increased quality factor” a quality factor (Q) whose value is greater than the Q value of the first LC circuit which is generally used in the art. Preferably the first LC circuit according to the invention is approximately two times greater than the Q value of a LC circuit of the art. For instance, if the Q value of the art is equal to 22.5, then the Q value of the first LC circuit according to the invention is equal to 45.
Basically, the more increased is the Q factor (compared to a standard situation) the higher the offset δ1 is. The relation between Q and δ1 depends on the distribution of spectral components of the modulation.
The first coil C1 is fed with the variable current or voltage representative of the signal to transmit. So it generates a quasi-static magnetic field component representative of the signals. The first LC circuit being tuned to F1 which is shifted from Fc, the spectrum generated by the first coil C1 of the transmitter T is asymmetrical (as illustrated in
This first coil C1 may be wound around a ferrite core FC1 in order to increase the total generated magnetic field which is equal to the sum of the magnetic field created by the variable current, and the magnetic field created by the magnetization of the material. Therefore such a ferrite core allows to increase the link efficiency.
In order the signals could be transmitted in a modulated form (i.e. modulated with the information to transmit), the transmitter T may also comprise a modulator MR upward the antenna driver CD, as schematically illustrated in
Moreover, when the signals to transmit have a lower carrier frequency than the operating one Fc, the transmitter T may also comprise an up-mixer UM arranged to translate the carrier frequency of these signals around the operating carrier frequency Fc. Such an up-mixer UM, which can be a multiplier, may be located between the modulator MR and the antenna driver CD, as schematically illustrated in
The distant receiver R comprises at least a second (RX) LC circuit (or tank), comprising a capacitor (not shown) and a second antenna coil C2 coupled together, and a circuit front-end FE coupled to the second LC circuit.
When the loops (or turns or else windings) of the second coil C2 are crossed by the (variable) magnetic field generated by the first coil C1 of a transmitter T, the second coil C2 generates a modulated current, which is representative of this magnetic field and therefore of the transmitted (and possibly modulated) signals with the operating carrier frequency Fc, by magnetic induction.
This second coil C2 may be wound around a ferrite core FC2 in order to increase the current induced by magnetic induction and therefore the link efficiency.
The circuit front-end FE receives the modulated current outputted by the second coil C2 and amplifies and filters it in order to output a filtered modulated current. According to the invention, the second LC circuit has an increased quality factor Q and is tuned to a second frequency F2 which is shifted in a second direction, opposite to the first one, from the operating carrier frequency Fc by a second value δ2. So, F2=Fc−/+δ2. In the preceding relation the second direction is represented by the sign − or +. More precisely, if F1=Fc+δ1 then F2=Fc−δ2, and if F1=Fc−δ1 then F2=Fc+δ2.
For instance, the second value δ2 may be also contained between 10 kHz and 200 kHz, and more preferably between 140 kHz and 180 kHz. The second value δ2 depends on the quality factor Q considered and the signal modulation used. Preferably, the second value δ2 is equal to the first value δ1. For instance one may choose first δ1 and second δ2 values equal to 150 kHz or 175 kHz.
One means also here by “an increased quality factor” a quality factor (Q) whose value is greater than the Q value of a RX LC circuit (or tank) which is generally used in the art.
It is important to notice that there are physical limitations to achieve a high Q factor. In other words the values that can be used for the Q factor according to the invention are rather limited. Higher the Q factor is, better it is in terms of current consumption to drive the first (TX) coil C1 and in terms of induced voltage on the second (RX) LC circuit (or tank) for a defined magnetic field (H) passing through the second (RX) coil C2. But to avoid destroying a modulated signal with a high Q factor (through signal attenuation and distortion), one must shift the first and second tuning frequencies of the first (TX) and second (RX) LC circuits (or tanks), in order the overall transfer function of the TX/RX filters be suited to pass the signal.
For instance, if the Q value of the art is equal to 22.5, then the Q value of the second LC circuit according to the invention is approximately two times greater, i.e. equal to 45.
The second LC circuit being tuned to F2 which is shifted from Fc, its amplification/filtering effect is asymmetrical (as illustrated in
The filtered modulated current (with the operating carrier frequency Fc), outputted by the second LC circuit, can be amplified by an amplifier A, as schematically illustrated in
When the currents, outputted by the second LC circuit (or the amplifier A which possibly follows the circuit front-end FE), are representative of signals modulated with information to retrieve, the receiver R must comprise a demodulator DR intended for demodulating these currents to retrieve the information they contain. Of course, this demodulator DR implements a demodulation which is of the same type that the modulation implemented by the modulator MR of the transmitter T.
The receiver R may also comprise a down-mixer DM arranged to translate the operating carrier frequency Fc of the currents around a chosen lower carrier frequency. Such a down-mixer DM may be located between the amplifier A (or the second LC circuit when the receiver R does not comprise an amplifier) and the demodulator DR, as schematically illustrated in
At least part of the transmitter T, and notably its modulator MR, up-mixer UM and circuit driver CD may constitute an integrated circuit realized in CMOS technology or in any technology used in chip industry fabrication. Moreover, at least part of the receiver R, and notably its demodulator DR and down-mixer DM and eventually its circuit front-end FE may constitute an integrated circuit realized in CMOS technology or in any technology used in chip industry fabrication.
A comparison of examples of antenna responses (in dB) as a function of frequency (in MHz), in the case of signal transmission systems STS of the art and according to the invention, is illustrated in
The curve referenced S1 represents antenna tank responses in a transmitter and a receiver of a signal transmission system of the art.
The curve referenced SC1 represents the transfer function of the combination of the transmitter and receiver antenna responses S1 of the signal transmission system of the art.
The curve referenced ST2 represents the frequency response of the antenna tank in a transmitter T of a signal transmission system STS according to the invention.
The curve referenced SR2 represents the frequency response of the antenna tank in a receiver R of the signal transmission system STS according to the invention.
The curve referenced SC2 represents the frequency response of the combination of the transmitter frequency response ST2 and receiver frequency response SR2 in the signal transmission system STS according to the invention.
Because of the frequency shifting and the increased Q factor in the LC circuit driver CD, the equivalent serial resistance of the transmit tank is halved leading to a+3 dB gain in power for a same first coil current (and thus the same magnetic field generation and magnetic induction potential on a remote second coil C2).
Moreover, due to the increased Q factor, the left tone (or tone 0, i.e. Fc−δ1) or right tone (or tone 1, i.e. Fc+δ1) of the FSK modulation is amplified in the receiver R in the same way as with the classical signal transmission system of the art, but the right tone is amplified by +6 dB compared to classical signal transmission system.
More, statistically half of the time, the current passing through the first coil C1 is approximately divided by 2.2 (−7 dB), because the right tone is approximately 7 dB below the left one in the transmit spectrum ST2. On the average this leads approximately to 4 dB power reduction. So, there is a gain in power due to the asymmetrical transmit spectrum (+2.2 dB).
Still more, the noise bandwidth of the receiver R is approximately divided by two, but it is compensated by a proportionally equivalent increase of the thermal noise.
Still more, the spectrum is eventually equalized by the transmitting/receiving antenna combination which leads to about same overall transfer function.
So in total a gain of approximately +5.2 dB can be reach.
Preferably, the Eb/No ratio (average energy per bit (b) over noise spectral density (No)) must be increased by 1 dB in order to keep performances identical to the ones of a classical signal transmission system of the art. For instance, to meet a BER (Bit Error Rate) equal to 10−3, the Eb/No ratio of a classical signal transmission system of the art must be equal to 14.5 dB while it must be equal to 15.5 dB in a signal transmission system STS according to the invention. Actually Eb for tone 0 (denoted Eb0) being higher than Eb (10 log10(Eb0/Eb)=2.2 dB), the ratio Eb0/No must be equal to 17.7 dB (15.5+2.2).
If the link budget is based on tone 0, with a Q factor equal to 45 and the above mentioned Eb0/No ratio, the required current through the first coil C1 must be approximately equal to 17 mA (rms) to get approximately 47 μV in case where the bandwidth is equal to 300 kHz.
So, with such values the power of the battery B (used into the transmitter T of the invention with an asymmetrical transmitted spectrum), for tone 0, must be approximately equal to 0.93 mW, while it would be equal to 1.78 mW in a classical transmitter with a symmetrical transmitted spectrum. For tone 1 the battery power is generally 2.2 lower than for tone 0, so the average battery power is approximately equal to 0.56 mW.
Therefore due to the invention the total gain in power in the transmitter T is approximately equal to 1.78/0.56≈3.17 (5 dB).
A gain may also be obtained in case where the modulation scheme is more compact than the FSK modulation scheme, and notably in case of a MSK modulation scheme which makes use of the highest Q factor that could be achieved in practice (45).
So, the invention offers several advantages, and notably a significant power reduction and an improved selectivity.
One will notice that the current consumption (on the transmitter side) varies with the type of symbol transmitted, but this can be managed by introducing a bit scrambling.
The invention is not limited to the embodiments of signal transmission system described above, only as examples, but it encompasses all alternative embodiments which may be considered by one skilled in the art within the scope of the claims hereafter.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10038475, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Proximity boundary based communication using radio frequency (RF) communication standards |
10084512, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Proximity boundary based communication |
10103786, | Mar 22 2011 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | System and method for close proximity communication |
10117050, | Nov 08 2010 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Techniques for wireless communication of proximity based content |
10122414, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Spatially enabled secure communications |
10164685, | Dec 31 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Spatially aware wireless network |
9300367, | May 06 2011 | OTICON A S | Receiver and method for retrieving an information signal from a magnetic induction signal |
9455771, | Mar 22 2011 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | System and method for close proximity communication |
9525209, | Aug 31 2010 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Method, apparatus, and computer-readable storage medium for contactless power supply and power control |
9560505, | Mar 23 2011 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Proximity based social networking |
9621227, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Proximity boundary based communication using radio frequency (RF) communication standards |
9621228, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Spatially aware communications using radio frequency (RF) communications standards |
9705564, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Spatially enabled secure communications |
9780837, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Spatially enabled secure communications |
9838082, | Aug 29 2014 | FREELINC HOLDINGS, LLC | Proximity boundary based communication |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4532932, | Jan 03 1984 | Pacesetter, Inc | Implant communication system with frequency shift means |
6104707, | Apr 28 1989 | SATIUS HOLDING, INC | Transformer coupler for communication over various lines |
6275143, | May 08 1998 | Security device having wireless energy transmission | |
6307468, | Jul 20 1999 | Avid Identification Systems, Inc. | Impedance matching network and multidimensional electromagnetic field coil for a transponder interrogator |
6323566, | Oct 10 1996 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Transponder for remote keyless entry systems |
6407987, | Apr 28 1989 | SATIUS HOLDING, INC | Transformer coupler for communication over various lines |
6731198, | Jan 08 1999 | Antaloli Stobbe | Security system, transponder and receiver device |
6940358, | Feb 08 2001 | National Semiconductor Corporation | Method and apparatus for tuning RF integrated LC filters |
7152804, | Mar 15 2004 | Ensurge Micropower ASA | MOS electronic article surveillance, RF and/or RF identification tag/device, and methods for making and using the same |
7218359, | Jul 26 2004 | Realtek Semiconductor Corp. | Digital television receiver and method of recovering incoming digital television signal |
7446631, | Mar 11 2005 | RfStream Corporation | Radio frequency inductive-capacitive filter circuit topology |
7512383, | Nov 26 2003 | Starkey Laboratories, Inc.; Oticon A/S | Transmit-receive switching in wireless hearing aids |
20010030988, | |||
20020053973, | |||
20050024198, | |||
20050063488, | |||
20050111681, | |||
20050111682, | |||
20050150740, | |||
20090001930, | |||
DE19718423, | |||
GB2326769, | |||
WO28664, | |||
WO9715125, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 02 2007 | NXP B.V. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Nov 08 2008 | NOEL, DENIS | NXP, B V | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 021826 | /0941 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0387 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042985 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042762 FRAME 0145 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051145 | /0184 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051030 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0387 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042985 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12681366 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 042985 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12681366 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 042762 | /0145 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12092129 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 039361 | /0212 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 038017 | /0058 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042762 FRAME 0145 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051145 | /0184 | |
Sep 03 2019 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP B V | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050745 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 31 2016 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 15 2020 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Sep 17 2024 | M1553: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 12th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
May 28 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Nov 28 2016 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 28 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
May 28 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
May 28 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Nov 28 2020 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 28 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
May 28 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
May 28 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Nov 28 2024 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
May 28 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
May 28 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |