An improved test fixture to evaluate thin composite laminates commonly used in deployable space structures. The fixture is designed to impart a pure moment into the coupon, a necessary improvement to prior test methods where results are obtained by fitting material properties in a nonlinear structural analysis of the test. fixture mechanics allow for direct calculation of the coupon flexural modulus and allowable flexural strain based on two key measurements, fixture displacement and applied load.
|
1. A test fixture used to determine bending properties of thin material specimens, said test fixture comprised of:
a. two rotating carts, each cart comprised of a horizontal arm rigidly connected to a near vertical arm making an angle of approximately 120 degrees at the connection point, both arms being approximately the same length and thickness, a rotating bearing attached to each side of said cart near said connection point and a rotating bearing mounted at the end of said near vertical arm opposite said connection point;
b. a specimen to be tested clamped at one end to the end of the horizontal arm opposite to said connection point of a first cart and the opposite end of said specimen clamped to the end of the horizontal arm opposite to said connection point of a second cart;
c. two parallel tracks upon which said rotating bearings located at said connection point of said carts can rotate to move said carts horizontally;
d. a cross member positioned vertically over the rotating bearing at the upper end of the near vertical arm of each cart and capable of being moved up or down vertically in response to an applied force and each cross member having a laser displacement sensor target attached;
e. a force sensor to measure said applied force;
f. a base upon which said tracks are rigidly attached;
g. laser displacement sensors for measuring the displacement between said cross members and said base in conjunction with said sensor targets, whereby properties of said specimen may be calculated from the direct measurement of the applied force and the cross member displacement.
|
The conditions under which this invention was made are such as to entitle the Government of the United States under paragraph 1(a) of Executive Order 10096, as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force, to the entire right, title and interest therein, including foreign rights.
The invention relates generally to testing of flexure specimens to determine strain and elastic modulus, and in particular to a device designed to allow testing under pure bending conditions of thin composite laminates used as flexural elements.
Thin composite laminates are commonly used in deployable space structures. In application, the laminates are elastically folded to allow a structure to be compactly stowed during launch and subsequently deployed to an operational state once in orbit. This basic technology enables operational systems containing structures such as solar arrays, reflectors, antennas, and booms to be efficiently packaged and launched within the payload envelope of conventional launch vehicle fairings or within tightly allocated volume constraints common to compartmentalized payloads such as CubeSats.
While the use of composite laminates in deployable structures is widely acceptable, in operation they are subjected to strain levels and deformations outside of traditional composite structural applications. As such, their behavior is poorly understood, making deployable structure design and analysis extremely difficult. Currently, standardized ASTM test methods are used to determine composite material strengths and linear-elastic stiffnesses under traditional loading applications such as axial and transverse tension, compression, and shear. Data from these tests yield accurate, basic properties that are useful for laminate design, but they fail to characterize the nonlinear constitutive behavior over the full strain range common to deployable structures.
Studies have shown that flexural loading will result in higher compressive and tensile strengths than are determined from traditional tensile and compressive coupon tests. Single fiber tests further support this behavior, showing significantly higher flexural strengths as compared to tensile strength data. Attempts at analytically quantifying these increased strengths have largely been ineffective or are not applicable to the thin laminates used in deployable structures. For example, the commonly used Weibull statistical model under predicts flexural strength, while single fiber data does not consider structural stabilization or the role of the laminate matrix. Furthermore, the extrapolation of classical bending theory, which assumes linear-elastic behavior, is of little value due to nonlinear composite stiffening and softening with increasing and decreasing strains respectively. Finally, the matter is further complicated by laminate thickness concerns for composites in bending. Thinner specimens have been found to have higher compressive strengths due to the steep stress gradient through the specimen thickness because of the close proximity of fibers under tension and compression.
The current method for such testing is demonstrated in
The device is designed for testing under pure bending conditions thin composite laminate specimens used as flexural elements in deployable structures used in space applications. While the use of composite laminates in deployable structures has become widely acceptable, they are subjected to large deformations with strain levels well beyond what classical theories predict. This test device was designed to be used in an ordinary test frame. The test specimen is clamped between two carts with rotating bearings located on two parallel tracks allowing horizontal movement. Each cart has a near vertical arm with a third rotating bearing at the upper end. Cross members apply force to the vertical arms causing the carts to move and stressing the specimen into an arc of up to 180 degrees.
The relationship between bending moment and specimen curvature allows calculation of strain and elastic modulus. The moment and curvature in the specimen can be calculated from the fixture geometry of the device and two direct measurements: applied axial load and cross member displacement.
An improved test fixture has been designed that allows pure moment to be imparted into the composite test coupon (thin composite laminate specimen). As shown in
Non-contact displacement sensors were chosen to avoid additional contribution (pollution) to the force registered by the load cell. Micro-Epsilon laser displacement sensors, with a measurement range of 100 mm, were selected for this application. Although not as precise, the test frame crosshead displacement data can be used to verify the data from the laser position sensors.
Three ball bearings 18, 19 provide low-friction rotation and minimal cart-to-track contact for each of the two carts. Standard electric motor type bearings with C-3 radial clearance were found to have sufficiently low breaking and rotational friction. The bearings are double shielded to prevent composite debris and other contaminates from stalling the bearing mechanism. To prevent degradation of the fixture corrosion, all parts, including the ball bearings, are made out of 17-4PH stainless steel. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that careful fixture alignment of carts, coupon, and cross members is required for successful test results.
The moment and curvature in the coupon are calculated from the fixture geometry and the two direct measurements: applied axial load and cross member displacement. Based on the test setup and the cart's free body diagram, shown in
The kinematic variables and constants of motion during testing are shown in
l=√{square root over (a2−h2)} (2)
Finally, by combining equations (1) and (2), a relationship for the applied pure moment as a function of the measured and constant testing parameters is:
The strain, ε, of a deformed element can be represented in terms of the distance from the neutral axis and the element's radius of curvature. Both carts are under equal load, bending the coupon as shown in
From the equations derived above, the moment vs. curvature relationship can be calculated. By fitting the data linearly and dividing the slope of the linear fit line by moment of inertia we find the flexural modulus of elasticity for the specific material in question. Curvature, k, is known to be:
From the mechanics of a simple beam in bending, the coupon strain can be expressed as shown in Eq. (4), where y is the distance from the coupon's neutral axis.
The maximum (tensile) and minimum (compressive) strains will occur at the coupon surfaces, where
These strains are:
and,
From previous experiments, or from baseline testing of new materials, a good understanding of the thin composite failure strains can be generated. With that information and the equations above, the unstrained coupon length, s, can be pre-set to ensure coupon failure occurs prior to reaching the mechanical testing limit where α=180°. The expression for the unstrained coupon length as a function of α is shown in Eq. (7), and the expression evaluated at α=180°=π is shown in Eq. (8).
s=R·α (7)
s=R·π (8)
Substituting the solution of
from Eq. (8) into Eq. (5), the unstrained coupon length, also the initial cart spacing, can be found for a maximum, predetermined strain value:
It should be noted that the above coupon length calculation is based on a linear material assumption, something that is not the case for composite materials. In this application, however, the linear approximation is sufficient to estimate the appropriate coupon length.
An important advantage of this test fixture is that a wide range of coupon sizes can be tested without any fixture changes. In addition, the fixture can be easily scaled for larger or smaller samples, or of different aspect ratio. The force required to produce the bending moment, however, can vary significantly as a function of the specimen thickness and its elastic modulus. Therefore, the correct load cell capacity must be selected to cover the test coupon matrix.
Ardelean, Emil V., Murphey, Thomas W., Sanford, Gregory E.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10024773, | Jan 13 2017 | The Boeing Company | System and method for loading a test asset |
10081041, | Dec 11 2012 | PRIMETALS TECHNOLOGIES AUSTRIA GMBH | Flatness measuring and measuring of residual stresses for a metallic flat product |
10444131, | Nov 23 2016 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Evaluating device of flexural property of material, and evaluation method using the same |
10571376, | Sep 11 2015 | SCHOTT AG | Method for testing the strength of sheets made of hard brittle material under tensile stress |
10663383, | Jul 14 2017 | MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FÖRDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN EV | Stress cell having first and second elements having first and second variable lengths |
11181453, | Sep 11 2015 | SCHOTT AG | Apparatus for testing the strength of sheets made of hard brittle material under tensile stress |
11460387, | Dec 18 2018 | WUHAN CHINA STAR OPTOELECTRONICS SEMICONDUCTOR DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | Bending test device of flexible display panel |
11885773, | Jun 24 2019 | Illinois Tool Works Inc.; Illinois Tool Works Inc | Methods and apparatus to perform load measurements on flexible substrates |
12078575, | May 06 2021 | Illinois Tool Works Inc. | Methods and apparatus to perform load measurements on multi-hinged devices |
8794079, | Nov 04 2011 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining magnitude of compressive loading |
9366591, | Nov 04 2011 | International Business Machines Corporation | Determining magnitude of compressive loading |
ER7823, |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5305634, | Nov 25 1992 | Suga Test Instruments Co. Ltd. | Weathering test method and sample holder used therein |
5437192, | Oct 20 1992 | Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation | Physical property measuring device |
7214200, | Dec 30 2002 | Roche Diabetes Care, Inc | Integrated analytical test element |
7708703, | Dec 30 2002 | Roche Diabetes Care, Inc | Integrated analytical test element |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 15 2011 | ARDELEAN, EMIL V | The Government of the United States as Represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026968 | /0470 | |
Sep 26 2011 | The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Sep 26 2011 | MURPHEY, THOMAS W | The Government of the United States as Represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026968 | /0470 | |
Sep 26 2011 | SANFORD, GREGORY E | The Government of the United States as Represented by the Secretary of the Air Force | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026968 | /0470 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 18 2016 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 24 2021 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Nov 08 2021 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 01 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 01 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 01 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 01 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 01 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 01 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 01 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 01 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 01 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 01 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 01 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 01 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |