In one aspect of the present invention a computer-implemented method is provided of processing input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, wherein the keyboard-type device selected from at least one of a keyboard and a keypad. In this aspect, input key events associated with a first process active within an operating system are received and monitored for a first predefined input key event associated with user selection of a first key of the keyboard-type device for at least a predetermined time period. In response to identifying the first predefined input key event, the input key events are redirected from the first process to a second process. The input key events are monitored for a second predefined input key event associated with further redirection of the input key events. In response to identifying the second predefined input key event, the input key events are redirected to the first process.
|
48. A computer-implemented method of processing input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, the method comprising:
(a) receiving a stream of input key events associated with a first application active within an operating system;
(b) monitoring the stream of input key events for a first predefined input key event;
(c) in response to identifying the first predefined input key event in the stream of input key events, causing at least some input key events received following the first predefined input key event to be directed to a second application and not to the first application;
(d) monitoring the stream of input key events for a second predefined input key event; and
(e) in response to identifying the second predefined input key event in the stream of input key events, causing at least some input key events received following the second predefined input key event to be directed to another application.
1. A computer-implemented method of processing a stream of input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, the keyboard-type device selected from at least one of a keyboard and a keypad, the method comprising:
(a) receiving input key events associated with a first process active within an operating system;
(b) monitoring the input key events for a first predefined input key event associated with user selection of a first key of the keyboard-type device for at least a predetermined time period;
(c) in response to identifying the first predefined input key event, redirecting the input key events from the first process to a second process wherein redirecting the input key events to the second process comprises providing representations of further keyboard events to the second process, but not to the first process, for processing;
(d) monitoring the input key events for a second predefined input key event associated with further redirection of the input key events; and
(e) in response to identifying the second predefined input key event, redirecting the input key events from the second process to another process.
26. A keyboard-type device comprising:
(a) a plurality of user input signal generators for producing first input signals in response to user actuation thereof;
(b) a display device; and
(c) a processor circuit in communication with said display device and said user input signal generators, said processor circuit configured to:
(i) monitor input key events represented by said first input signals for a first predefined input key event, and direct a flow of representations of the input key events to a personal computing device remote from the keyboard-type device;
(ii) if the first predefined input key event is identified in the input key events, stop the flow of representations of the input key events to the personal computing device, generate a plurality of predictive text completion candidates in response to said first input signals and display said plurality of predictive text completion candidates on said display device; and
(iii) communicate at least one of said predictive text completion candidates to the personal computing device remote from the keyboard-type device in response to user selection of the at least one of said predictive text completion candidates.
25. A system for processing input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, the keyboard-type device selected from at least one of a keyboard and a keypad, the system comprising:
(a) means for receiving input key events associated with a first process active within an operating system;
(b) means for monitoring the input key events for a first predefined input key event associated with user selection of a first key of the keyboard-type device for at least a predetermined time period;
(c) means for redirecting the input key events from the first process to a second process in response to identifying the first predefined input key event wherein said means for redirecting the input key events from the first process to the second process comprises means for providing representations of further keyboard events to the second process, but not to the first process, for processing;
(d) means for monitoring the input key events for a second predefined input key event associated with further redirection of the input key events; and
(e) means for redirecting the input key events to another process in response to identifying the second predefined input key event.
51. A keyboard-type device comprising:
(a) keyboard input key means for generating a stream of input key events in response to user input;
(b) display means for displaying information to the user; and
(c) a processor circuit in communication with said keyboard input key means and said display means, said processor circuit configured to:
(i) direct at least some input key events to a remote computing device;
(ii) monitor the stream of input key events for a first predefined input key event;
(iii) in response to identifying the first predefined input key event in the stream of input key events, cause at least some input key events following the first predefined input key event to be directed to a predictive text entry system and not to the remote computing device, wherein the predictive text entry system is operable to generate a set of predictive text completion candidates for completing a partial text entry generated in response to the user input; and
(iv) communicate a particular predictive text completion candidate from said set of predictive text completion candidates to the remote computing device in response to user selection of the particular predictive text completion candidate.
32. A computer-implemented method of processing input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, the keyboard-type device selected from at least one of a keyboard and a keypad, the method comprising:
(a) receiving a stream of input key events associated with a first application active within an operating system;
(b) monitoring the stream of input key events for a first predefined input key event associated with a first user redirection request to redirect the stream of input key events from the first application to a second application, wherein the first predefined input key event is associated with user selection of a first key of the keyboard-type device for at least a predetermined time period;
(c) in response to identifying the first predefined input key event in the stream of input key events, causing at least some input key events received following the first predefined input key event to be directed to the second application and not to the first application;
(d) monitoring the stream of input key events for a second predefined input key event associated with a second user redirection request to redirect the stream of input key events from the second application to another application; and
(e) in response to identifying the second predefined input key event in the stream of input key events, causing at least some input key events received following the second predefined input key event to be directed to another application.
3. The method of
generating a plurality of predictive text completion candidates in response to the input key events which are received by the second process; and
providing at least one of the plurality of predictive text completion candidates to the first process in response to the second predefined input key event.
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
11. The method of
12. The method of
13. The method of
14. The method of
15. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having stored instructions for use in execution of the method of
16. The method of
17. The method of
activating a redirection timer in response to user selection of the first key on the keyboard-type device; and
deactivating the redirection timer in response to user deselection of the first key on the keyboard-type device;
wherein the first predefined input key event is identified if the first key is selected for a period of time sufficient to allow the redirection timer to reach the predetermined time period.
18. The method of
19. The method of
the first process comprises at least one of a word processor, a browser, a micro-browser, a spreadsheet, a database interface, and an email application; and
the second process comprises a predictive text entry application.
20. The method of
21. The method of
22. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions for directing a processing unit to execute the method of
23. A system for processing a user input stream received from a keyboard-type device, the system comprising:
(a) a processor;
(b) a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for directing the processor to execute the method of
24. The method of
(a) redirecting the input key events from the first process to the second process comprises redirecting the stream of input key event data from the first process to the second process; and
(b) redirecting the input key events from the second process to another process comprises redirecting the stream of input key event data from the second process to the another process.
27. The keyboard-type device of
28. The keyboard-type device of
29. The keyboard-type device of
30. The keyboard-type device of
31. The keyboard-type device of
33. The method of
(i) if the user selection of the particular key of the keyboard-type device occurs for less than a predetermined time period, allowing input key events associated with the user selection of the particular key to be directed to the first application; and
(ii) if the user selection of the particular key of the keyboard-type device occurs for at least the predetermined time period, identifying that the first user redirection request has been made and directing at least some subsequent input key events to the second application and not to the first application.
34. The method of
35. The method of
36. The method of
37. The method of
directing a set of input key events to the first application while providing a copy of the set of input key events to the predictive text entry application to enable the predictive text entry application to retrieve, from a dictionary, completion candidates based on the set of input events.
38. The method of
39. The method of
causing a third application to become active within the operating system in response to user input from the keyboard-type device;
receiving at least one user redirection request via the keyboard-type device to direct at least one future input key event to the third application; and
directing the at least one future input key event to the third application.
40. The method of
41. The method of
receiving at least one input key event associated with a first user redirection cancellation request whereby the user indicates that the functionality of the second application should be made temporarily unavailable to the user; and
causing further input key events to be directed to the first application.
43. The method of
44. The method of
45. The method of
46. The method of
47. The method of
49. The computer-implemented method of
(a) the first application comprises at least one of a word processor, a browser, a micro-browser, a spreadsheet, a database interface, and an email application;
(b) the second application comprises a predictive text entry application operable to generate a plurality of completion candidates for completing a partial text entry generated in response to the user input; and
(c) the another application is the first application.
50. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium having instructions stored thereon for directing a processor circuit to execute the method of
52. The keyboard-type device of
53. The keyboard-type device of
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
The present invention relates to a method, system, apparatus and computer-readable media for directing input associated with a keyboard-type device.
In one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a computer-implemented method of processing input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, the keyboard-type device selected from at least one of a keyboard and a keypad. In this aspect, the method comprises:
Many variations of this method are contemplated, as described further in this specification. There is also provided a computer-readable medium having stored instructions for use in execution of the aforementioned method and its variations.
In another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a system for processing input key events associated with user input received from a keyboard-type device, the keyboard-type device selected from at least one of a keyboard and a keypad. In one arrangement, the system comprises:
In yet another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a keyboard-type device comprising:
Several other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
In the accompanying drawings which illustrate embodiments of the invention,
Reference will now be made in detail to implementations and embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
Introduction
Referring to
The input management system 20 operates in association with a computer-implemented operating system 22, which for the purposes of the first embodiment is Windows XP™. Both the input management system 20 and the operating system 22 are stored on and run on the personal computing device 10 in the first embodiment. In other embodiments, the personal computing device may be operative over a computer network with some or all of the operating system 22 located on a host computer server or other remote computing device. Similarly, the input management system 20 may be located on a remote computer server or other remote computing device and accessed remotely by a terminal-type unit or by another form of personal computing device (including personal computing device 10).
The input management system 20 is configured to monitor a user input stream 24 associated with a first process 30 active within the operating system 22. The user input stream 24 comprises codes representing input key events associated with user operation of the keyboard-type device 14. As the user operates the keyboard-type device 14, selecting and deselecting keys, the codes are received by the personal computing device 10 and identified as input key events by the operating system 22.
The input management system 20 monitors the user input stream 24 for an occurrence of a first predefined input key event associated with user selection of a first key of the keyboard-type device 14 for at least a predetermined time period T1. In the first embodiment, the input management system 20 comprises a monitoring module 28 configured to perform the monitoring of the user input stream 24. In response to identifying the occurrence of the first predefined input key event, the input management system 20 is configured to redirect the user input stream 24 from the first process 30 to a second process 34.
For the purposes of this specification, the term “process” means a computer-implemented process for completing a set of computer-implemented instructions in order to provide predetermined functionality to a user and which is receptive to user input. Such a process can be a computer program, including a software application, applet or the like, and can be either an independent program or it may be a program that provides certain functionality to a larger program.
Windows Applications
In the first embodiment, processes are represented by windows applications which are displayed on a graphical user interface. For illustration purposes, the first process 30 is a word processor application, more particularly Microsoft™ Word™, and the second process 34 is a predictive text entry system 34.1. In the illustrated embodiment, the predictive text entry system 34.1 is an application configured to predict and retrieve predictive text completion candidates (or completion candidates) from a dictionary by determining which predictive text completion candidates in the dictionary are more likely to be the ones that the user is attempting to type based on the characters in the partial text entry generated by the user, as illustrated in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/399,560 (corresponding to PCT/CA01/01473, International Publication No. WO 02/33527 A2). Various forms of the predictive text entry system 34.1 may be used as illustrated in PCT/CA01/01473. Preferably, potential completion candidates retrieved by the predictive text entry system 34.1 are displayed in a searchable list and may be selected using the keyboard or a mouse or a combination of both the keyboard and the mouse. Other types of predictive text entry systems may be used in the present case. By way of example, other predictive text entry systems are illustrated in co-owned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/272,700 (PCT/CA00/000285, International Publication No. WO 00/57265).
As indicated above, the use of the word processor application as the first process 30 and the predictive text entry system 34.1 as the second process 34 are for illustration purposes. It will be appreciated that many other end-user processes may be used in substitution of a word processor and the predictive text entry system 34.1. By way of example, the first process 30 can, in the alternative, be a spreadsheet, a browser, a database interface, an enterprise resource planning system, or some other form of process providing functionality to a user and receptive to user input in association with a keyboard-type device. In addition or in the alternative, the second process 34 can be another form of predictive text entry system or some other process configured to provide additional functionality to the user in association with the first process 30 or to another process operative in connection with the second process 34 in response to redirection of the user input stream 24.
Redirecting the user input stream 24 to the second process 34 in response to the first predefined input key event for at least the predetermined time period T1 enables the input management system 20 to provide an adaptive interface for enhancing the functionality of the first process 30 with functionality provided by the second process 34. Alternatively, the redirection mechanism provided by the input management system 20 can be used to invoke one or more other processes to enhance the functionality of the first process 30 or another process available on or through the personal computing device 10. The redirection mechanism of the input management system 20 is described in further detail below.
In the first embodiment, once the user input stream 24 has been redirected to the second process 34, the input management system 20 monitors the user input stream 24 for an occurrence of a second predefined input key event associated with further redirecting the user input stream 24. In response to identifying the occurrence of the second predefined input key event, the input management system 20 redirects the user input stream 24 to either the first process 30 or another process. In the case of the first embodiment, the input management system 20 redirects the user input stream 24 back to the first process 30.
Input Key Events and Keyboard-Type Input
Input key events associated with user operation of the keyboard-type device 14 are communicated to the applicable process via the operating system 22. An input key event represents an event associated with a particular key or set of keys supported by the keyboard-type device 14. In general, an input key event is associated with user selection or deselection of a key or set of keys available the keyboard-type device 14. For example, selection of a particular key on the keyboard-type device 14 represents one input key event, and deselection of the selected key represents another input key event. Selection of a particular key for at least predefined period of time T1 represents another input key event associated with user operation of the keyboard-type device 14. Input key events are used by the input management system 20 to manage the direction of the user input stream 24 and to determine which process or set of processes will receive the user input stream 24 in response to or during a particular input key event or set of input key events.
As mentioned earlier, in the first embodiment the keyboard-type device 14 is preferably a keyboard 14.1. In this case, keyboard input is received from the keyboard 14.1 by the personal computing device 10 in the form of input key events (in this embodiment, also referred to as keyboard events) which are processed by the operating system 22. Preferably, keyboard input is received by the operating system 22 via a keyboard device driver that receives scan codes from the keyboard 14.1. The scan codes represent identifiers associated with the respective keys on the keyboard 14.1. Each key on the keyboard 14.1 preferably has a unique scan code value associated with it. The mechanism by which scan codes are implemented can be device dependent and therefore the keyboard device driver applicable to the keyboard 14.1 device in use provides a mechanism for receiving scan codes from the applicable keyboard 14.1 and for having the scan codes translated into virtual key codes recognizable by the operating system 22. Keyboard device drivers and their use in connection with keyboard devices are well known in the art.
In the first embodiment, where the operating system 22 is Windows XP™, the keyboard device driver interprets a scan code and translates it into a virtual key code which is a device independent value defined by the operating system 22 that identifies the purpose of a key. The keyboard 14.1 generates two scan codes when a user selects a key on the keyboard 14.1. One scan code is generated when the user selects the key and another is generated when the user deselects the key.
System Level Focus for Keyboard Input
Keyboard input received from the keyboard 14.1 is communicated via the operating system 22 to the process that has the keyboard focus. The keyboard focus is used as a mechanism for determining which process is currently assigned to receive keyboard input. The keyboard focus can be set to a particular process using the commands available with the applicable operating system 22. For example, with Windows XP™ the keyboard focus can be given to one of the applications (or windows) preferably by calling the SetFocus function and the AttachThreadInput function available with the Windows XP™ operating system. With Windows XP™ a window can be made active and brought to the foreground in the graphical user interface by setting the window using the SetActiveWindow and SetForegroundWindow functions provided by Windows XP™. In the first embodiment, keyboard input received from the keyboard 14.1 is translated by the operating system 22 and posted as a keyboard message to a message queue of the thread that created the window with the keyboard focus. Eventually, the keyboard message is removed from the message queue and passed to the appropriate window procedure of the window with the keyboard focus. This form of keyboard focus is well known in the art and is referred to in this specification as operating system-level keyboard focus. More generally, the term “system-level input focus” is used in this specification to refer to the assignment of input received from a keyboard-type device to a process through functionality provided by the operating system (such as through a programmable interface or API available with the operating system). System-level input focus includes the operating system-level keyboard focus described above.
In the first embodiment, the operating system 22 shares the keyboard 14.1 among the various processes running within the operating system 22 (where these processes are represented in the first embodiment as windows applications running within Windows XP™), by shifting the keyboard focus from one window (process) to another window (process) at the user's direction. The window that has the keyboard focus receives the keyboard messages from the user input stream 24 until the keyboard focus changes to a different window. The keyboard focus can be shifted from one window (process) to another window (process) through a variety of activities including, but not limited to, the user opening a new application using the keyboard 14.1, a mouse or another human input device; by the user shifting keyboard focus from one window to another window that does not currently have keyboard focus (for example by switching windows by using the mouse to click on a window that does not currently have keyboard focus), or by some other action of the user that the operating system 22 is configured to recognize as a shift in keyboard focus from one window (process) to another window (process) running on the operating system 22. Other examples of a user switching windows would be by a user selecting a window that does not have system focus by using the ALT and TAB key or ALT and ESC key, or by selecting it from the task bar in Windows XP™.
In the absence of the input management system 20, keyboard input, once translated by the applicable keyboard device driver, would be placed in an applicable message queue for receipt by the application in the window that currently has the keyboard focus. As illustrated in
Logical Focus
As discussed above, keyboard input can be directed to a particular process using the system-level input focus provided by the operating system 22. This is one approach to control the flow of the user input stream 24 for some embodiments, if the operating system 22 and the associated personal computing device operate fast enough to handle a rapid stream of input from the keyboard-type device. However, managing redirection of the user input stream 24 solely through the assignment of system-level input focus can present certain challenges. For example, from the perspective of the input management system 20, with certain Windows™ applications such as the Internet Explorer™ browser or the Excel™ spreadsheet, one cannot reliably maintain the same state of the original application when switching input focus at the operating system level back to the original application following a redirection. As well, with certain operating systems such as Windows™, certain applications, such as the MS-DOS™ command window, will not automatically give up system-level input focus.
In the first embodiment, a timer mechanism is preferably implemented to provide another layer of keyboard focus. In this way, with the introduction of the input management system 20, at least two levels of keyboard focus are supported: the keyboard focus provided at the operating system level (earlier referred to more generally as the system-level input focus), and a logical keyboard focus supported by the input management system 20. For the purposes of this specification, “logical keyboard focus” refers to an assignment of keyboard input to a process while another process continues to be assigned operating system-level keyboard focus. More generally, in this specification the term “logical input focus” refers to an assignment of input from a keyboard-type device to a process while another process continues to be assigned system-level input focus. Thus, in the first embodiment, through the use of logical keyboard focus, the input management system 20 is configured to support the redirection of keyboard input from one process to another process even though the first process continues to be assigned keyboard focus at the operating system level. In this way, keyboard input from the keyboard 14.1 can be directed towards the appropriate process based on the context in which the keyboard input is being received even though another process has been assigned keyboard focus at the operating system level and would be therefore entitled to otherwise receive the keyboard input. Enabling the redirection of keyboard input to be independent of which process has keyboard focus at the operating system level provides a significant advantage in that it allows the input management system 20 to support redirection of the keyboard input to one or more processes independent of limitations imposed by the operating system 22 on keyboard focus at the operating system level. Moreover, this approach provides improved consistency in how input from the keyboard 14.1 (more generally, from a keyboard-type device) is received by applications in the presence of one or more processes that provide expanded functionality for one or more of the other processes resident in the operating system 22.
Operating Environment
The personal computing device 10 in the first embodiment is a laptop computer having a graphical display device comprising a liquid crystal display.
The keyboard-type device 14 provides a mechanism for providing user input to programs running on the personal computing device 10. As discussed earlier, user input is received from the keyboard-type device 14 in the form of codes received in user input stream 24 and which represent input key events associated with user operation of the keyboard-type device 12. As indicated above, in the first embodiment the keyboard-type device 14 is a QWERTY-type keyboard. However, the keyboard-type device 14 can be a keyboard, a keypad or both a keyboard and a keypad, and the actual configuration of a keyboard or keypad can vary (such as, by way of example, keyboard configurations from Logitech™, keyboard configurations from Dell Corporation, the Half Keyboard™ by Matias Corporation, and the Dvorak keyboard layout). In addition, various types of keyboards and keypads may be used in connection with the input management system, including, but not limited to, physical keyboards and keypads, and virtual keyboards and virtual keypads (also referred to as soft keyboards and soft keypads). Physical keyboards and keypads may be wired, wireless or encased within (or forming part of) the personal computing device (such as with many laptops and hand held devices). With virtual keyboards and keypads, a visual representation of the keyboard or keypad (as the case may be) is displayed using a display device such as a computer monitor, LCD screen, touch sensitive screen, digital projector or some other display device for displaying images generated by a computing device. In certain cases with virtual keyboards and keypads, the display device also serves as a physical input interface for the user, such as with touch-sensitive screens. Moreover, in another aspect, keys formed on a physical keyboard-type device or displayed on a virtual keyboard-type device can be more generally referred to as a plurality of user input signal generators. In certain circumstances the plurality of user input signal generators comprise a plurality of physical keys. In other circumstances, the plurality of user input signal generators comprise a plurality of virtual keys. Virtual keys can be displayed on a display device or projected onto a display area (such as with holographic keyboards or keypads).
It will also be appreciated that while in the first embodiment the personal computing device 10 is a laptop, the aspects and features of the present invention may be practiced with a wide range of personal computing devices including personal computers, workstations, laptops, hand held computing devices including personal digital assistants and tablet PCs, computer terminal units and the like, and other electronic devices including mobile phones, Internet appliances (including home and office computers and TVs connected to the Internet), and embedded devices (including home and office devices), provided the aforementioned personal computing devices have or are operative with, directly or indirectly, a suitable graphical display device and a virtual or physical keyboard-type device receptive to user operation. Other types of equivalent personal computing devices to which the features and aspects of the present invention are applicable include, by way of example, an Internet appliance controlled via a virtual or physical keyboard-type device (for instance, running an Internet application though a television or other display device in association with a wireless keyboard).
With respect to the computer-readable medium 16 described above, it will be appreciated that software entities (for example, input management system 20 and second process 34) can be stored as computer-readable instructions on one or more types of computer-readable media including smart media, flash memory, a memory key such as a USB memory key, a hard disk drive, a network drive, a micro-drive, CD-ROM, CD-R, CD-RW, DVD (+/−R, +/−RW), optical disk, mini-disk, floppy disk, a ZIP disk, or some other computer-readable media, provided the computer-readable media is capable of storing computer-readable instructions and can operate as part of or in communication with the personal computing device 10.
For the purposes of the first embodiment, the operating system 22 installed on the personal computing device 10 is Windows XP™. However, the operating system 22 can be any operating system suitable for supporting the operation of the input management system 20 in connection with the applicable personal computing device. For example, for hand-held devices the operating system 22 can be an operating system suitable for the applicable hand-held device, such as, by way of example, Windows CE™, PocketPC™, EPOC™, PalmOS™, or an equivalent operating system. For larger personal computing devices, such as workstations, laptops or desktop computers, an operating system suitable for the applicable personal computing device may be used, such as, by way of example, Windows™ (including Windows XP™, Windows 2000™ or the like), MacOS™, UNIX™, Linux™, or the like.
System Flow
Referring to
In the discussion that follows, the word processor representing the first process 30 initially has system-level input focus and is therefore designated, in so far as the operating system 22 is concerned, to receive keyboard input. Redirection of keyboard input from the first process 30 to the second process 34 and back is handled by the input management system 20 based on the keyboard input received from the keyboard 14.1 and the state of the keyboard input when it is received.
In the first embodiment, when the predictive text entry system 34.1 (or more generally, the second process 34) is initially launched, the predictive text entry system 34.1 initializes the input management system 20. As part of this initialization, the input management system 20 calls functionality supplied by the operating system 22 so as to make the input management system 20 available to the operating system 22. For the first embodiment, where Windows XP™ is used, the Windows™ SetWindowsHookEx function is called so as to make the input management system 20 available to the operating system 22. In addition, the predictive text entry system 34.1 starts a system focus recorder 34.2 which is configured to monitor the system-level input focus associated with the operating system 22 on a reoccurring basis. The system focus recorder 34.2 starts a reoccurring timer loop which records the system-level input focus on a reoccurring basis every N number of milliseconds (where N represents a predetermined number of milliseconds, for example, 20 milliseconds). In the first embodiment, the system focus recorder 34.2 obtains the system-level input focus by invoking the GetFocus function provided by Windows XP™. With Windows XP™, system-level input focus is assigned to a particular window (for example, the first process 30 in the example shown in
The input management system 20 monitors user input stream 24 for keyboard input received by the personal computing device 10 from the keyboard 14.1. In the first embodiment, the keyboard input is received by the personal computing device 10 in the form of scan codes associated with the applicable key on the keyboard 14.1, which the user has selected and then deselected. As indicated earlier, in response to the selection of a key on the keyboard 14.1, a particular scan code is generated by the keyboard 14.1, which is translated by the operating system 22 into a virtual key code for use by one or more processes using the operating system 22.
In response to receiving a virtual key code, the input management system 20 checks at block 100 to see if a request for keyboard input redirection has been previously received by the input management system 20 from another process. More generally, block 100 involves evaluating whether the occurrence of a first predefined input key event has taken place.
In the first embodiment, from the user's perspective, a redirection request occurs when the user selects an alphanumeric key on keyboard 14.1 for a sufficient period of time to cause a redirection timer to reach the predetermined time period T1. From the perspective of the programming logic in the first embodiment, requests for the redirection of keyboard input are made to the input management system 20 by an input management director 34.3 embedded in the predictive text entry system 34.1. The input management director 34.3 is configured to identify when a redirection event has occurred and to set a redirection flag in the input management system 20 when the redirection event is identified. The input management director 34.3 is also operative to pass keyboard input received from the input management system 20 on to the predictive text entry system 34.1 for further processing. The operation of the input management director 34.3, including when it passes keyboard input on to the predictive text entry system 34.1 is discussed further below.
The processing at block 100 involves checking to see whether the redirection flag in the input management system 20 has been set (e.g. if the redirection flag has been set to “ON” or “ACTIVE”). In the first embodiment, a redirection timer associated with the redirection flag is used by the input management director 34.3 to set the redirection flag. When the redirection timer fires, the input management director 34.3 is configured to set the redirection flag so that it is “ON”. The redirection timer fires when it has reached the predetermined time period T1. Preferably, the redirection flag takes the form of a coding variable in the input management system 20. The setting and resetting of the redirection flag is discussed in further detail below.
If the input management system 20 determines at block 100 that it has previously received a redirection request for keyboard input from another process (in this case, the input management director 34.3), then processing proceeds to block 102 where the virtual key code and the related information regarding the state of the associated key are sent as a registered message (more generally, a keyboard message) to the input management director 34.3 for further processing (discussed in further detail below in the context of
Once the input management system 20 sends the registered message at block 102 to the input management director 34.3, the input management system 20 waits to receive further keyboard input.
If the input management system 20 determines at block 100 that it is not in a state where it has been configured to initiate redirection of keyboard input to the input management director 34.3, then processing proceeds to block 104. At block 104 the input management system 20 evaluates whether the keyboard input currently received has a repetition indication associated with it. The keyboard input currently received will have a repetition indication associated with it if the key associated with such keyboard input has been selected for a period of time sufficient to active the automated repeat feature of the keyboard device driver. If the answer to the evaluation at block 104 is “NO”, then processing proceeds to block 106 where a copy of the keyboard input is sent, in the form of a registered message, to the input management director 34.3 which in this case will pass the copy of the keyboard input on to the predictive text entry system 34.1 at block 146 (note that in the drawings the predictive text entry system 34.1 is referred to as PredictionLogic). This action is taken in the first embodiment so as to allow the predictive text entry system 34.1 to update its predictive engine. In order for the predictive engine to predict completion candidates preferably on an ongoing basis, the predictive text entry system 34.1 needs to be kept informed of the keyboard inputs received by the personal computing device 10 in association with the first process 30 (in this case, Microsoft™ Word™), whether or not a redirection request has been made or acted upon. Thus, keyboard input is forwarded by the input management system 20 to the predictive text entry system 34.1 in order to update that application's prediction engine, even while the first process 30 (Microsoft™ Word™) has both the system-level input focus and the logical input focus. This feature is particular to the operation of the predictive text entry system in the first embodiment. In other embodiments, where the second process 34 is a function expanding process that does not need to know substantially all of the keyboard input received in association with the first process 30, transmitting a copy of the keyboard input to the second process 34 at block 106 or another block in association therewith need not take place.
In the first embodiment, using Windows XP™, the keyboard input sent at block 106 to the input management director 34.3 is sent as a registered message, as described above, using the PostMessage function provided by Windows XP™.
While a copy of the keyboard input is sent in the first embodiment at block 106 to the input management director 34.3 so that it may be passed on to the predictive text entry system 34.1 at block 146, the original keyboard input itself is passed on at block 108 to a chain of monitoring processes, handled by the operating system 22, where once the original keyboard input has been processed through the chain of processes (if any), the original keyboard input is delivered to the first process 30, provided that the monitoring processes in the chain did not process the original keyboard input themselves. If the chain of monitoring processes is empty, then the input management director 34.3 instructs the operating system 22 to pass the original keyboard input on to the first process 30. In the first embodiment, the original keyboard input is passed on to the chain of monitoring processes by calling the CallNextHookEx function provided by Windows XP™.
If the input management system 20 determines at block 104 that the keyboard input currently received has a repetition indication associated with it, processing proceeds to block 110. At block 110, the input management system 20 checks to see whether the keyboard input currently received represents a key from a set of predefined keys whose repetition the input management system 20 is configured not to use as a redirection instruction (referred to here as “non-redirectional repetitive keys”). In the first embodiment, the input management system 20 is configured to recognize non-alphanumeric keys as non-redirectional repetitive keys, such as the arrow keys, the Backspace key, the Control key, the Shift key, the Alt key, the Del key, and the like.
If the keyboard input currently received is determined at block 110 to be a non-redirectional repetitive key, then processing proceeds to blocks 114, 116 and 118. Blocks 114, 116 and 118 provide a mechanism for arranging to have the keyboard input currently received sent to the first process 30 and for arranging to have a copy of the keyboard input currently received sent to the predictive text entry system 34.1 notwithstanding the fact that input management system 20 has identified a repetition indication in association with the keyboard input currently received.
At block 114, the input management system 20, preferably in the monitoring module 28, transforms the non-redirectional repetitive key into individual keystroke events. Before the transformation, the non-redirectional repetitive key is represented by a keyboard message comprising (1) the virtual key code for the selected key, (2) the scan code associated with the selected key and received from the keyboard 14.1, (3) the Key_Down indication (in the form of a Key_Down flag) associated with the selected key, (4) a repetition indication (in the form of a ON/OFF flag), and (5) a repetition number indicating the amount of repetitions collected by the keyboard 14.1 before the input management system 20 was notified). The transformation at block 114 transforms the keyboard message representing the non-redirectional repetitive key into at least one pair of registered messages, with each registered message within the pair comprising the same information as the keyboard message except that (1) the repetition indication information is not stored by either registered message in the pair, and (2) the first registered message in the pair contains the Key_Up indication and second registered message in the pair contains the Key_Down indication.
At block 116 the registered messages generated at block 114 are sent to the input management director 34.3, which passes the registered messages to the input management director 34.3 to be passed on to the predictive text entry system 34.1 for further processing.
At block 118, the original keyboard input currently received is passed on, in the same manner described with respect to block 108, to a chain of monitoring processes, where the original keyboard input currently received will be delivered to the first process 30 (Microsoft™ Word™), provided that the monitoring processes in the chain did not process the original keyboard input themselves.
Following block 118, processing by the input management system 20 of the keyboard input currently received ends and the input management system 20 waits to receive the next keyboard input.
Referring back to block 110, if the keyboard input currently received is determined at block 110 to not be a non-redirectional repetitive key, the current keyboard input is not sent on to either the first process 30 or to the predictive text entry system 34.1, but is instead simply ignored (effectively removing the current keyboard input) and the input management system 20 waits to receive the next keyboard input. In this way, the input management system 20 is configured in the first embodiment to remove, from keyboard input intended for the first process 30, any repeated entries of an alphanumeric key that would ordinarily result in input within a Microsoft™ Word™ document when an alphanumeric key is held down for a sufficient period of time. The repeated entries of an alphanumeric key (but not the first instance of the key itself before the repetition takes place) are removed from the input stream sent to the first process 30 in order to set up the first process 30 to a predetermined input state wherein the first instance of the alphanumeric key has been received and the further repeated instances of the alphanumeric key arising from continued selection of the alphanumeric key have not been received. This provides a consistent predetermined input state for the current application represented by the first process 30, advantageously allowing the predictive text entry system 34.1 (where predictive text entry is used) to know what the input state was for the first process 30 just before redirection occurred.
Setting the Redirection Timer
Once the input management director 34.3 receives the copy of the keyboard input sent by input management system 20, the input management director 34.3 will set the redirection timer in order to monitor for redirection requests with respect to future keyboard input. The setting of the redirection timer is described in further detail below with reference to blocks 140 and 144 (see
Referring to
The input management director 34.3 monitors for a redirection event using the redirection timer. A redirection event occurs when the redirection timer fires (ie. reaches predetermined time period T1). Once the redirection timer fires (identified in block 148 as a redirection event) the input management director 34.3 assigns logical input focus to the predictive text entry system 34.1 and records the redirection cancellation key. In the first embodiment, the redirection cancellation key is the last keyboard input received from the keyboard 14.1 when the redirection timer fired. The last keyboard input received is recorded at block 150 so that a further indication of redirection (a further redirection event) can be identified. The further redirection event is an indication of when logical input focus needs to be redirected back to the first process 30. With the recordation of last keyboard input received when the redirection timer fired, the input management director 34.3 can determine (at block 132, as discussed above) when the further redirection event occurs so that steps can be taken to redirect keyboard input back to the first process 30.
In the first embodiment, logical input focus is assigned to the predictive text entry system 34.1 by the input management director 34.3 setting the redirection flag, located in the input management system 20, to “ON” at block 150. With the redirection flag set to “ON”, the logical input focus is assigned to the predictive text entry system 34.1.
For the first embodiment the selection of the space bar key on the keyboard 14.1 for the predetermined time period T1 is used as one of the triggers for a redirection event. While this is not necessary for all embodiments, where this is carried out in the first embodiment, then through the operation of the input management system 20 the virtual key code for the space bar will be sent on to the first process 30 even in instances where the user intended only to use the space bar as a trigger to invoke the functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1. To resolve this issue, at block 150 the input management director 34.3 backs out of an instance of the space bar entry sent to the first process 30 if the redirection event was triggered by the selection of the space bar.
Note that once logical input focus is assigned to the predictive text entry system 34.1, if the keyboard input state for keyboard input received by the input management director 34.3 indicates a Key_Up state, then this is an indication that a key selected by the user is being released. If the key selected by the user is being released (which is interpreted as an indication of a further redirection event), then in the first embodiment this means that redirection cancellation has been requested, in which case the logical input focus assigned to the predictive text entry system 34.1 is released and reassigned to the first process 30. In this case, when a selected key is identified at block 132 as being released (or deselected), processing proceeds to blocks 134 and 136 where the input management director 34.3 is configured to pass the redirection cancellation request (also referred to as a termination request) to the predictive text entry system 34.1 (also referred to as PredictionLogic) and to set the logical input focus to the first process 30 by setting the redirection flag to “OFF” (i.e. the redirection flag located in the input management system 20 is cleared). In response to being passed the redirection cancellation request, the predictive text entry system 34.1 is configured to terminate the availability of the selection functionality provided by the predictive text entry system 34.1 while it is assigned logical input focus and to send the selected completion candidate (if any has been selected by the user using the predictive text entry system 34.1 while it was assigned logical input focus) to the last recorded process 30 that previously received keyboard input.
Referring back to block 132, if the input management director 34.3 determines that there has not been a redirection cancellation request, then processing proceeds to block 138 where the keyboard input received is passed on in the form of a key message to the predictive text entry system 34.1 for further processing. The key message comprises information associated with the keyboard input received, including the (1) the virtual key code for the key currently selected on the keyboard 14.1 (the selected key), (2) the scan code associated with the selected key and received from the keyboard 14.1, and (3) an indication of the input state of the selected key (a Key_Down indication).
In response to receiving the key message passed by the input management director 34.3 at block 138, the predictive text entry system 34.1 invokes the applicable expanded functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1 available in association with the particular keyboard input received. For instance, with reference to
‘y’, ‘u’, ‘i’, ‘o’, and ‘p’ keys behave as the left arrow key, which are used to undo or correct the recent activation of a completion candidate in the aforementioned list of completion candidates.
Similarly, when another alphanumeric key, other than the space bar, such as the letter “d” or “i” (see block 44 of
Referring back to block 130 of
Note more generally that the redirection timer is activated (started) when a key on the keyboard 14.1 is selected (a Key_Down event) and, once activated, the redirection timer is deactivated (cleared) once a Key_Up event is received in association with the same key that initiated the activation of the redirection timer.
If the keyboard input currently received by the input management director 34.3 is determined at block 140 to not have a keyboard input state indicating that a key has been selected, then the redirection timer is cleared at block 142 if the keyboard input state is identified as Key_Up. Following block 142, the keyboard input currently received is, at block 146, passed on in the form of a key message to the predictive text entry system 34.1 for processing by the predictive engine of the predictive text entry system 34.1 in order to keep the prediction engine up-to-date with the keyboard input being received from the keyboard 14.1.
It will be noted that for the embodiment illustrated the second process 34 serves as a function expander, providing additional functionality relevant to the operation of the first process 30. While the second process 34 has logical input focus, the user is able to make use of the additional functionality provided by the second process 34 to enhance the use of the first process 30 in ways that would not otherwise be available without the presence of the second process 34. From a programming perspective, using the input management system 20 and the input management director 34.3 as a mechanism to redirect keyboard input to the second process 34 so that additional functionality can be accessed and used by the user in connection with the first process 30 enables the programming framework to be highly adaptive to a wide range of function enhancing (or function adding) processes (such as predictive text entry system 34.1) configured to provide additional functionality in association with the first process 30. With this approach, additional function enhancing processes can be configured independent of the process that is to have its functionality enhanced (the target process, i.e. the second process 34), preferably without having to modify the programming code of the target process or application in question.
In the first embodiment, as described above, the user will continue to have access to the additional functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1 (or more generally, the second process 34) provided the user continues to keep the input key on the keyboard 34.1 selected that was used to invoke redirection of the keyboard input to the predictive text entry system 34.1. Once the user deselects the selected key that triggered redirection of the keyboard input to the predictive text entry system 34.1, the input management system 20 is configured to redirect further keyboard input to the first process 30 and the functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1 controllable from the keyboard 14.1 becomes, from the user's perspective, temporarily unavailable, at least until keyboard input is once again redirected to the predictive text entry system 34.1.
In certain cases, it may be tiring to a user to have to keep the key that triggered redirection selected in order to maintain access to the functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1. To address this issue where it may be desired, in a variation to the first embodiment the key that triggered the redirection of keyboard input to the predictive text entry system 34.1 (or more generally the second process 34) need not remain selected in order for the user to maintain access to the functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1 once keyboard input has been redirected to the predictive text entry system 34.1. In this variation, the input management system 20 and the input management director 34.3 are configured to continue redirecting keyboard input to the predictive text entry system 34.1 until the input management director 34.3 receives keyboard input in the form of a predetermined key entry or sequence that is recognized as an instruction from the user to redirect keyboard input back to the first process 30 (or to another third process). In this variation, logical input focus, once assigned to predictive text entry system 34.1 would not be reassigned to the first process 30 unless the predetermined key entry or sequence was identified by the input management director 34.3. In this way, the user can continue to use the enhanced functionality of the predictive text entry system 34.1 without having to keep the key selected that triggered redirection of keyboard input to the predictive text entry system 34.1. An embodiment of this variation is illustrated with reference to
The particular embodiment illustrated with
Additional Aspects and Features
The input management system 20 can include a variety of aspects and features to further enhance functionality and flexibility for the user, in addition to the various aspects and features discussed above in this specification. Furthermore, as with the aspects and features described above with reference to the earlier embodiments, each of the following aspects and features individually provides a beneficial enhancement and is an embodiment of the present invention. These additional aspects and features will now be described below.
As before, the following aspects and features can be applied to or used with many types of personal computing devices and can be stored as computer-readable instructions in one or more types of computer-readable media.
Context Sensitive Approach with Multiple Function Expanders
Referring to
Referring to
Once the redirection timer is activated at block 144 and the input management director 34.3 detects a redirection event at block 148, this results in the redirection flag being set to “ON” and the redirection cancellation key being recorded at block 150. In addition, at block 152 processing proceeds to block 160 in
In yet another variation, where multiple expander processes are used (such as illustrated in
In another variation of the embodiment shown in
Key-Based Repetition Indications
Referring to
When keyboard input is received by the input management system 20 it is processed in a manner similar to that described in the first embodiment. However, if the keyboard input received has been flagged with a repetition indication, then, in this further embodiment, at block 120 of
Referring to
In yet another variation, the further embodiment shown in
Referring to
Rapid Dictionary Updates Using Control-C
Referring to
As illustrated in
If the control-C input sequence is detected at block 100B and a redirection request for keyboard input is detected at block 100, then the C entries in conjunction with the control key are passed on to the input management director 34.3 in the form of registered messages at block 102. The input management director 34.3 will, in this case, simply ignore the repeated C entries (after the first instance of C) received in conjunction with the control key.
If the control-C input sequence is detected at block 100B and but no redirection request for keyboard input is detected at block 100, then processing proceeds to block 104 where, if a redirection indication is detected in the manner described in the first embodiment, processing proceeds to block 105. If the control-C input sequence is identified at block 105, the input management system 20 passes the control-C input sequence on to the operating system 22 by calling the CallNextHookEx function. In this way, the first process 30 can act upon the control-C input sequence by placing a copy of the selected character sequence (if any) into the clipboard managed by Windows XP™ (or more generally, by the operating system 22). If the control-C input sequence is not identified at block 105, then the keyboard input is sent as a registered message to the input management director 34.3 in the ordinary manner described above for the first embodiment.
In this variation, if the control-C input sequence is selected long enough by the user, the keyboard 14.1 starts an automatic repeat feature, flagging keyboard input events with a repetition indication. When the first occurrence of the repetition of the control-C input sequence is identified by the input management system 20 at block 111, a registered message indicating a control-C event is sent at block 113 to the input management director 34.3. The input management director 34.3 will, at block 139, identify the registered message indicating a control C event, and in response will, at block 150A, set the redirection flag and record the redirection cancellation key (in this case the key associated with the letter “c”) for the purposes of identifying when redirection should stop and keyboard input should be sent to the first process 30. Once this is carried out, the predictive text entry system 34.1 starts a dialog window displaying the content captured in the clipboard by the control-C input sequence and questions the user whether this content should be added to a dictionary used by the predictive text entry system 34.1.
Multilingual Display
In another aspect, the predictive text entry system 34.1 (or more generally, the second process 34) is configured to display variations of a character selected by the user in response to a redirection event in which keyboard input is redirected to the predictive text entry system 34.1. In this case, when an alphanumeric key on the keyboard 14.1 is selected for predetermined time limit T1, keyboard input is redirected from the first process 30 to input management director 34.3. The input management director 34.3 checks at block 130 (
Alternative Character Sets
In the first embodiment, the input management system 20 and the input management director 34.3 use alphanumeric characters that are selected for a predetermined period of time as the trigger for a redirection of keyboard input from the first process 30 to the second process 34. In another aspect of the present invention, the input management system 20 and the input management director 34.3 can be configured to use other character sets to serve as the trigger for a redirection of keyboard input. In this variation, redirection of keyboard input is triggered by the selection of a character from another character set for the predetermined period of time. In this variation, the input management system 20 and the input management director 34.3 can be configured to support any set of characters which the user may then select and use to enter text into the personal computing device 10. The terms “character set” and “set of characters” refer to a set containing a plurality of letters, numbers and/or other typographic symbols. Examples of character sets include, but are not limited to, one or more alphabets of a written language (for example, English, French, German, Spanish, Italian, Chinese, or Japanese), and binary-coded character sets such as ASCII (American Standard Code for Information Interchange), EBCDIC (Extended Binary Coded Decimal Interexchange Code), BCD (Binary Coded Decimal), and Unicode.
Pointer-Type Events
In another variation of the first embodiment, when a virtual keyboard is used in place of the physical keyboard 14.1, selection and deselection of keys on the virtual keyboard are preferably communicated directly to the predictive text entry system 34.1. Pointer-type devices such as a stylus and a mouse are used to generate pointer-type input events. In general, pointer-type input events comprise information identifying the state of the pointer-type device, for example, the “up” state or no contact state, and the “down” state or contact state. In addition, selection and deselection of a completion candidate display in a graphical user interface, through the use of a pointer-type device, will also preferably result in communication of the pointer-type input events directly to the predictive text entry system 34.1.
In response to receiving a pointer-type input event, the predictive text entry system 34.1 in this variation is configured to verify whether the pointer-type input event is associated with a recognizable region of the touch sensitive screen. If the pointer-type input event is not associated with the recognizable region of the touch sensitive screen, the predictive text entry system 34.1 simply ignores the event. If the pointer-type input event is associated with the recognizable region of the touch sensitive screen, the predictive text entry system 34.1 translates the pointer-type input event into a translated event representing (a) an equivalent input key event if the pointer-type input event is associated with selection or deselection of a key on the virtual keyboard, or (b) an unrecognized input key event if the pointer-type input event is associated with selection or deselection of a completion candidate displayed in the graphical user interface. Equivalent input key events are passed on to the input management director 34.3 for processing, which processes such equivalent input key events following the logic described in the first embodiment above with reference to
In the variation immediately above, continued selection of a virtual key on the virtual keyboard using a pointer-type device (such as a stylus or mouse) preferably results in the redirection process being triggered as described in the first embodiment with reference to
In another alternative variation, the virtual keyboard can operate as a separate entity from the predictive text entry system 34.1. With this arrangement, where the virtual keyboard produces input key events as a result of key selection and deselection, similar to a physical keyboard, the input management system 20 (as in the first embodiment) preferably monitors for selections and deselections of keys from the virtual keyboard. An example of such a virtual keyboard is the On-Screen keyboard provided by Windows XP™.
Enhanced Keyboard-Type Device
Referring to
In the embodiment illustrated in
Like the predictive text entry system 34.1 in the first embodiment, the predictive text entry system 34.1A is an application configured to predict and retrieve predictive text completion candidates (or completion candidates) from a dictionary by determining which predictive text completion candidates in the dictionary are more likely to be the ones that the user is attempting to type based on the characters in the partial text entry generated by the user. In the embodiment shown in
The processor circuit shown in
Thus, the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 provides both a mechanism for providing keyboard-type input (input signals) generated through user actuation of the keyboard 206 to the remote personal computing device and a mechanism for processing the keyboard-type input using the processor circuit so that predictive text completion candidates can be displayed on the touch sensitive screen 210 and are available for user selection and transmission to the remote personal computing device for processing by a remote computer program running on the remote personal computing device. Preferably, such processing includes inserting the user selected predictive text completion candidate in a text editor window provided by the remote computer program and displayed on a remote display device associated with the remote personal computing device.
The user can provide user input to the remote personal computing device using either the keyboard 206 or the touch sensitive screen 210. The keyboard 206 operates in a similar way as the keyboard 14.1 in the first embodiment. Each selection of a key and each deselection of a key on the keyboard 206 will result in a scan code being sent by the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 to the remote personal computing device. However selections and deselections of keys on the keyboard 206 will also be received as input key events by the input management system 20 operating within the keyboard-type device 200. In response to receiving such input key events, the input management system 20 is configured to process the input key events according to the flow diagram shown in
In this embodiment, the predictive text entry system 34.1A, which is running on the enhanced keyboard-type device 200, is configured to display on a display area on the touch sensitive screen 210 a plurality of predictive text completion candidates for user selection, wherein the plurality of predictive text completion candidates are generated by the predictive text entry system 34.1A based on the contents of an input string generated from the input key events received by the predictive text entry system 34.1A from the keyboard 206.
The enhanced keyboard-type device 200 is also configured to direct the input key events being sent to the remote personal computing device instead to the input management system 20 in response to identifying (detecting) a first predefined input key event for at least a predetermined time period T1. In the present embodiment, the first predefined input key event is the selection of an alphanumeric key on the keyboard 206 for a predetermined time period T1. The detection of a first predefined input key event for at least a predetermined time period T1 represents a redirection event. In the embodiment shown, a redirection timer is used to determine if the first predefined input key event is detected for predetermined time period T1. In response to detection of the redirection event, the input management system 20 is configured to set a redirection flag to “ON” (see blocks 148 and 150) and to direct all user input (in the form of input key events) to the input management director 34.3 located within the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 (in the illustrative embodiment, embedded within the predictive text entry system 34.1A) effectively stopping the flow of keystrokes to the remote personal computing device from the keyboard 206 for so long as the redirection event is not terminated (canceled). During the redirection event, the input management director 34.3 is configured to pass the input key events (in the form of keyboard messages) on to the predictive text entry system 34.1A at block 138C. The predictive text entry system 34.1A in turn is configured to update the list of available predictive text completion candidates for display in the touch sensitive screen 210 based on the input key events received from the input management director 34.3.
When the user selects a predictive text completion candidate displayed on the touch sensitive screen 210 a “mouse down” event (more generally, a “point device down” event) will be received by the predictive text entry system 34.1A. Continuing selection of the selected predictive text completion candidate will trigger the redirection event once the redirection timer (set at block 144 of
The predictive text entry system 34.1A is configured to treat reception of a “mouse up” event as detection of a redirection cancellation event. In the present embodiment, the “mouse up” event indicates the occurrence of the redirection cancellation event and is identified at block 132 of
In response to detecting a redirection cancellation event at block 132 (of
The particular embodiment illustrated with
Preferably, events generated through operation of the touch sensitive screen 210 (e.g. mouse down and mouse up events) are immediately received by the predictive text entry system 34.1A, bypassing the input management system 20 and the input management director 34.3. In this case, when a mouse up event is received by the predictive text entry system 34.1A while the redirection flag is set to “ON”, the predictive text entry system 34.1A is configured to notify the input management director 34.3 that a redirection cancellation event has occurred, in which case processing proceeds according to blocks 132, 134C and 136.
On start-up of the enhanced keyboard-type device 200, the user selects the user-preferred keyboard layout available on the portable keyboard, which should be known and selected on the remote personal computing device. In this manner both the remote personal computing device as well as the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 are in synch insofar as the scan codes being used, when these scan codes are sent from the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 to the remote personal computing device following user input. The arrangement of the keys for this keyboard layout can vary according to the user's preference.
The communication between the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 and the remote personal computing device occurs in the form of scan codes. The enhanced keyboard-type device 200 generates two scan codes when the user types a key, one when the user presses the key and another when the user releases the key. This technique is well known art in the industry.
In the above embodiment, the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 is configured to send the scan codes representing a selected predictive text completion candidate to the remote personal computing device at a rate that the remote personal computing device is able to handle.
It will be noted that the above embodiment (shown in
In an alternative arrangement, a plurality of operating system-specific configurations of the predictive text entry system 34.1 and at least one instance of the data associated with predictive text entry system 34.1 can be stored on an external computer-readable medium (such as a removable USB drive) configured to communicate with the enhanced keyboard-type device 200. In this arrangement, the operating system running on the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 is one of the operating systems for which there is an operating system-specific configuration of the predictive text entry system 34.1 stored on the external computer-readable medium. The enhanced keyboard-type device 200 in this case is configured to operate the operating system-specific configuration of the predictive text entry system 34.1 from the external computer-readable medium if it is available and to use the associated data (e.g. a dictionary comprising predictive text completion candidates) located on the external computer-readable medium.
In this alternative arrangement, the external computer-readable medium is adapted to be disconnected (decouplable) from the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 and to be connected (couplable) directly to the remote personal computing device for operation and use of the predictive text entry system 34.1 directly on the remote personal computing device. Preferably, the external computer-readable medium is adapted to be connected to a second physical instance of the enhanced keyboard-type device 200 for use and operation of that second physical instance in connection with one or more remote personal computing devices. In this arrangement, the data associated with the predictive text entry system 34.1 can also be stored on the external computer-readable medium. Moreover, as one or more of the operating system-specific configurations of the predictive text entry system 34.1 located on the external computer-readable medium are used, the associated data (such as the dictionary) is preferably updated whenever the predictive text entry system 34.1 is instructed to update its dictionary. In this way, a very portable input system is available to the user, containing personal data associated with one or more of the operating system-specific configurations of the predictive text entry system 34.1 so that the user-specific configuration of the one or more of the operating system-specific configurations of the predictive text entry system 34.1 can be used on any type of personal computing device compatible with the external computer-readable medium.
In another variation of the embodiment shown in
In yet another variation of the embodiment shown in
Although this invention has been described with reference to illustrative and preferred embodiments of carrying out the invention, this description is not to be construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications of form, arrangement of parts, steps, details and order of operations of the embodiments illustrated, as well as other embodiments of the invention, will be apparent to persons skilled in the art upon reference to this description. It is therefore contemplated that the appended claims will cover such modifications and embodiments as fall within the true scope of the invention.
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 10019435, | Oct 22 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Space prediction for text input |
| 10089159, | Nov 03 2016 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Processing non-spatial input by multiple program elements of a computer program executed on a computer |
| 10140284, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Partial gesture text entry |
| 10228819, | Feb 04 2013 | 602531 British Cilumbia Ltd. | Method, system, and apparatus for executing an action related to user selection |
| 10241673, | May 03 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Alternative hypothesis error correction for gesture typing |
| 10489508, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Incremental multi-word recognition |
| 10528663, | Jan 15 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Touch keyboard using language and spatial models |
| 10650053, | May 17 2011 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS THE SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | Systems and methods for guided construction of a search query in an electronic commerce environment |
| 10977440, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Multi-gesture text input prediction |
| 11334717, | Jan 15 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Touch keyboard using a trained model |
| 11379663, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Multi-gesture text input prediction |
| 11397771, | May 17 2011 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS THE SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | Systems and methods for guided construction of a search query in an electronic commerce environment |
| 11727212, | Jan 15 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Touch keyboard using a trained model |
| 8850350, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Partial gesture text entry |
| 8887103, | Apr 22 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Dynamically-positioned character string suggestions for gesture typing |
| 9021380, | Oct 05 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Incremental multi-touch gesture recognition |
| 9081500, | May 03 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Alternative hypothesis error correction for gesture typing |
| 9134906, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Incremental multi-word recognition |
| 9542385, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Incremental multi-word recognition |
| 9547439, | Apr 22 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Dynamically-positioned character string suggestions for gesture typing |
| 9552080, | Oct 05 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Incremental feature-based gesture-keyboard decoding |
| 9633109, | May 17 2011 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS THE SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | Systems and methods for guided construction of a search query in an electronic commerce environment |
| 9678943, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Partial gesture text entry |
| 9697281, | Feb 26 2013 | Fast Simon, Inc. | Autocomplete search methods |
| 9710453, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Multi-gesture text input prediction |
| 9798718, | Oct 16 2012 | GOOGLE LLC | Incremental multi-word recognition |
| 9830311, | Jan 15 2013 | GOOGLE LLC | Touch keyboard using language and spatial models |
| 9841895, | Jun 12 2015 | GOOGLE LLC | Alternative hypothesis error correction for gesture typing |
| Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
| 3644898, | |||
| 4211497, | Mar 01 1974 | Data input system | |
| 4330845, | Dec 31 1979 | International Business Machines Corporation | Guess-ahead feature for a keyboard-display terminal data input system |
| 4396992, | Apr 08 1980 | Sony Corporation | Word processor |
| 4471459, | Sep 30 1981 | UNISYS CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | Digital data processing method and means for word classification by pattern analysis |
| 4499553, | Sep 30 1981 | UNISYS CORPORATION, A CORP OF DE | Locating digital coded words which are both acceptable misspellings and acceptable inflections of digital coded query words |
| 4559598, | Feb 22 1983 | Method of creating text using a computer | |
| 4648044, | Jun 06 1984 | Teknowledge, Inc. | Basic expert system tool |
| 4689768, | Jun 30 1982 | IBM INFORMATION PRODUCTS CORPORATION, 55 RAILROAD AVENUE, GREENWICH, CT 06830 A CORP OF DE | Spelling verification system with immediate operator alerts to non-matches between inputted words and words stored in plural dictionary memories |
| 4730252, | Sep 24 1985 | International Business Machines Corp.; International Business Machines Corporation | Document composition from parts inventory |
| 4744050, | Jun 26 1984 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Method for automatically registering frequently used phrases |
| 4774666, | May 14 1985 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Translating apparatus |
| 4782464, | Dec 26 1985 | SMITH CORONA CORPORATION, 65 LOCUST AVENUE, NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 A DE CORP | Compact spelling-check dictionary |
| 4783761, | Dec 26 1985 | SMITH CORONA CORPORATION, 65 LOCUST AVENUE, NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 A DE CORP | Spelling check dictionary with early error signal |
| 4786765, | Jul 23 1986 | Wacom Co., Ltd. | Coordinates input system |
| 4807181, | Jun 02 1986 | SMITH CORONA CORPORATION, 65 LOCUST AVENUE, NEW CANAAN, CT 06840 A DE CORP | Dictionary memory with visual scanning from a selectable starting point |
| 4847766, | Jan 05 1988 | Smith Corona Corporation; SMITH CORONA CORPORATION, | Dictionary typewriter with correction of commonly confused words |
| 4891786, | Feb 22 1983 | International Business Machines Corp | Stroke typing system |
| 4969097, | Sep 18 1985 | Method of rapid entering of text into computer equipment | |
| 4980855, | Aug 29 1986 | Brother Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha | Information processing system with device for checking spelling of selected words extracted from mixed character data streams from electronic typewriter |
| 5040113, | Jan 28 1987 | Data manipulation program | |
| 5060154, | Jan 06 1989 | Smith Corona Corporation | Electronic typewriter or word processor with detection and/or correction of selected phrases |
| 5067165, | Apr 19 1989 | Ricoh Company, Ltd.; RICOH COMPANY, LTD , A JAPANESE CORP | Character recognition method |
| 5096423, | Sep 03 1985 | Computer system for teaching abbreviations for text and data processing functions | |
| 5203704, | Dec 21 1990 | DSI DATOTECH SYSTEMS INC | Method of communication using pointing vector gestures and mnemonic devices to assist in learning point vector gestures |
| 5218536, | May 25 1988 | Franklin Electronic Publishers, Incorporated | Electronic spelling machine having ordered candidate words |
| 5220649, | Mar 20 1991 | Microsoft Corporation | Script/binary-encoded-character processing method and system with moving space insertion mode |
| 5220652, | Jul 21 1986 | Computer application programs data input interface for handicapped persons responsive to multiple push buttons for selecting data stored in binary tree | |
| 5258748, | Aug 28 1991 | Hewlett-Packard Company | Accessing and selecting multiple key functions with minimum keystrokes |
| 5261112, | Sep 08 1989 | Casio Computer Co., Ltd. | Spelling check apparatus including simple and quick similar word retrieval operation |
| 5297041, | Jun 11 1990 | Semantic Compaction Systems | Predictive scanning input system for rapid selection of auditory and visual indicators |
| 5305205, | Oct 23 1990 | Acacia Patent Acquisition Corporation | Computer-assisted transcription apparatus |
| 5327161, | Aug 09 1989 | 3M Innovative Properties Company | System and method for emulating a mouse input device with a touchpad input device |
| 5329609, | Jul 31 1990 | Fujitsu Limited | Recognition apparatus with function of displaying plural recognition candidates |
| 5347295, | Oct 31 1990 | THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Control of a computer through a position-sensed stylus |
| 5392447, | Jan 10 1992 | Eastman Kodak Compay | Image-based electronic pocket organizer with integral scanning unit |
| 5487616, | Jun 01 1995 | Jean D., Ichbiah | Method for designing an ergonomic one-finger keyboard and apparatus therefor |
| 5500935, | Dec 30 1993 | Xerox Corporation | Apparatus and method for translating graphic objects and commands with direct touch input in a touch based input system |
| 5543818, | May 13 1994 | Rockwell Collins, Inc | Method and apparatus for entering text using an input device having a small number of keys |
| 5559942, | May 10 1993 | Apple Computer, Inc | Method and apparatus for providing a note for an application program |
| 5574482, | May 17 1994 | Method for data input on a touch-sensitive screen | |
| 5594640, | Aug 02 1993 | Apple Inc | Method and apparatus for correcting words |
| 5596699, | Feb 02 1994 | Linear-viewing/radial-selection graphic for menu display | |
| 5606674, | Jan 03 1995 | Intel Corporation | Graphical user interface for transferring data between applications that support different metaphors |
| 5621641, | Dec 21 1988 | Computer assisted text system | |
| 5623406, | Mar 06 1995 | Jean D., Ichbiah | Method and system for entering text in computer equipment |
| 5629733, | Nov 29 1994 | Rovi Guides, Inc; TV GUIDE, INC ; UV CORP | Electronic television program guide schedule system and method with display and search of program listings by title |
| 5649223, | Dec 21 1988 | Word based text producing system | |
| 5657397, | Oct 10 1985 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Preprocessing means for use in a pattern classification system |
| 5666139, | Oct 15 1992 | Advanced Pen Technologies, Inc. | Pen-based computer copy editing apparatus and method for manuscripts |
| 5689667, | Jun 06 1995 | AUTODESK CANADA CO | Methods and system of controlling menus with radial and linear portions |
| 5704029, | May 23 1994 | Seven Networks, Inc | System and method for completing an electronic form |
| 5724457, | Jun 06 1994 | RAKUTEN, INC | Character string input system |
| 5734749, | Dec 27 1993 | NEC Corporation | Character string input system for completing an input character string with an incomplete input indicative sign |
| 5745116, | Sep 09 1996 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Intuitive gesture-based graphical user interface |
| 5758324, | Feb 08 1996 | Oracle Taleo LLC | Resume storage and retrieval system |
| 5790115, | Sep 19 1995 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | System for character entry on a display screen |
| 5805158, | Aug 22 1996 | MEDIATEK INC | Copying predicted input between computer systems |
| 5805159, | Aug 22 1996 | MEDIATEK INC | Mobile client computer interdependent display data fields |
| 5805167, | Sep 22 1994 | Popup menus with directional gestures | |
| 5805911, | Feb 01 1995 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Word prediction system |
| 5812697, | Jun 10 1994 | FOOTHILLS IP LLC | Method and apparatus for recognizing hand-written characters using a weighting dictionary |
| 5818437, | Jul 26 1995 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Reduced keyboard disambiguating computer |
| 5821512, | Jun 26 1996 | Symbol Technologies, LLC | Shopping cart mounted portable data collection device with tethered dataform reader |
| 5835635, | Sep 22 1994 | Interntional Business Machines Corporation | Method for the recognition and completion of characters in handwriting, and computer system |
| 5838302, | Feb 24 1995 | Intellectual Ventures Holding 81 LLC | Data inputting devices for inputting typed and handwritten data in a mixed manner |
| 5845300, | Jun 05 1996 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and apparatus for suggesting completions for a partially entered data item based on previously-entered, associated data items |
| 5864340, | Aug 22 1996 | MEDIATEK INC | Mobile client computer programmed to predict input |
| 5881169, | Sep 13 1996 | BlackBerry Limited | Apparatus and method for presenting and gathering text entries in a pen-based input device |
| 5896321, | Nov 14 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Text completion system for a miniature computer |
| 5911485, | Dec 11 1995 | GOOGLE LLC | Predictive data entry method for a keypad |
| 5914708, | Apr 04 1996 | Cirque Corporation | Computer input stylus method and apparatus |
| 5926178, | Jun 06 1995 | AUTODESK CANADA CO | Display and control of menus with radial and linear portions |
| 5943039, | Feb 01 1991 | U.S. Philips Corporation | Apparatus for the interactive handling of objects |
| 5953541, | Jan 24 1997 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Disambiguating system for disambiguating ambiguous input sequences by displaying objects associated with the generated input sequences in the order of decreasing frequency of use |
| 5959629, | Nov 25 1996 | Sony Corporation | Text input device and method |
| 5963666, | Aug 18 1995 | International Business Machines Corporation; IBM Corporation | Confusion matrix mediated word prediction |
| 5963671, | Nov 17 1991 | LENOVO SINGAPORE PTE LTD | Enhancement of soft keyboard operations using trigram prediction |
| 5974558, | Sep 02 1994 | NEC Corporation | Resume on pen contact |
| 5977887, | May 09 1992 | IRONWORKS PATENTS LLC | Data storage apparatus |
| 5977948, | Feb 18 1997 | NISHIBORI, MASAHIRO; KAKUTA, TATSUO; SATO, KOUJI | Input processing system for characters |
| 5982351, | Sep 30 1997 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for supplementing a keyboard and for helping a user operate an electronic device |
| 6002390, | Nov 25 1996 | IRONWORKS PATENTS LLC | Text input device and method |
| 6005549, | Jul 24 1995 | User interface method and apparatus | |
| 6008799, | May 24 1994 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and system for entering data using an improved on-screen keyboard |
| 6011554, | Jul 26 1995 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Reduced keyboard disambiguating system |
| 6026233, | May 27 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and apparatus for presenting and selecting options to modify a programming language statement |
| 6037942, | Mar 10 1998 | DIDI HK SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LIMITED | Navigation system character input device |
| 6084576, | Sep 27 1997 | User friendly keyboard | |
| 6088649, | Aug 05 1998 | THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT | Methods and apparatus for selecting a destination in a vehicle navigation system |
| 6094197, | Dec 21 1993 | Xerox Corporation | Graphical keyboard |
| 6097392, | Sep 10 1992 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and system of altering an attribute of a graphic object in a pen environment |
| 6097841, | May 21 1996 | Hitachi, Ltd. | Apparatus for recognizing input character strings by inference |
| 6098086, | Aug 11 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Japanese text input method using a limited roman character set |
| 6101461, | Feb 28 1997 | Justsystem Corp. | Command inputting method |
| 6111985, | Jun 06 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Method and mechanism for providing partial results in full context handwriting recognition |
| 6144378, | Feb 11 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Symbol entry system and methods |
| 6148104, | Nov 15 1996 | Synaptics, Inc. | Incremental ideographic character input method |
| 6154758, | May 13 1994 | Apple Inc | Text conversion method for computer systems |
| 6167411, | Jun 22 1998 | WSOU Investments, LLC | User interface for entering and editing data in data entry fields |
| 6167412, | Jul 14 1998 | Agilent Technologies Inc | Handheld medical calculator and medical reference device |
| 6188789, | Dec 05 1996 | PALMSOURCE, INC | Method and apparatus of immediate response handwriting recognition system that handles multiple character sets |
| 6256030, | Nov 30 1993 | International Business Machines Corp. | Navigation within a graphical user interface for a compound graphical object using pointing device input |
| 6262719, | Sep 02 1994 | NEC Corporation | Mouse emulation with a passive pen |
| 6275612, | Jun 09 1997 | International Business Machines Corporation | Character data input apparatus and method thereof |
| 6282315, | Oct 22 1990 | Samsung Electronics, Ltd. | System for entering handwritten data into computer generated forms |
| 6286064, | Jan 24 1997 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Reduced keyboard and method for simultaneous ambiguous and unambiguous text input |
| 6292179, | May 12 1998 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Software keyboard system using trace of stylus on a touch screen and method for recognizing key code using the same |
| 6295372, | Mar 03 1995 | PALMSOURCE, INC | Method and apparatus for handwriting input on a pen based palmtop computing device |
| 6307549, | Jul 26 1995 | Nuance Communications, Inc | Reduced keyboard disambiguating system |
| 6369807, | Jun 04 1997 | Renesas Electronics Corporation | Online character entry device |
| 6377965, | Nov 07 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Automatic word completion system for partially entered data |
| 6405060, | Jul 19 1995 | Cirrus Logic, Inc. | User interface with improved data entry features for telephone system |
| 6424983, | May 26 1998 | Global Information Research and Technologies, LLC | Spelling and grammar checking system |
| 6442295, | Feb 12 1997 | SGS-THOMSON MICROELECTRONICS S R L | Word recognition device and method |
| 6473006, | Dec 11 1995 | GOOGLE LLC | Method and apparatus for zoomed display of characters entered from a telephone keypad |
| 6487424, | Jan 14 1998 | Nokia Technologies Oy | Data entry by string of possible candidate information in a communication terminal |
| 6502114, | Mar 20 1991 | Microsoft Corporation | Script character processing method for determining word boundaries and interactively editing ink strokes using editing gestures |
| 6539421, | Sep 24 1999 | Meta Platforms, Inc | Messaging application user interface |
| 6608639, | Nov 12 1997 | Alpine Electronics, Inc | Method of inputting name |
| 6621939, | Jun 14 1999 | Sony Corporation | Scene description generating apparatus and method, object extracting method, and recording medium |
| 6646572, | Feb 18 2000 | CDN INNOVATIONS, LLC | Method for designing optimal single pointer predictive keyboards and apparatus therefore |
| 6654733, | Jan 18 2000 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Fuzzy keyboard |
| 6661920, | Jan 19 2000 | Qualcomm Incorporated | Method and apparatus for multiple simultaneously active data entry mechanisms on a computer system |
| 6734881, | Apr 18 1995 | LG ELECTRONICS, INC | Efficient entry of words by disambiguation |
| 6751603, | May 16 2000 | Oracle America, Inc | Autocomplete method and apparatus for data file selection |
| 6801190, | May 27 1999 | Cerence Operating Company | Keyboard system with automatic correction |
| 6888141, | Dec 02 2002 | MULTISPECTRAL IMAGING, INC | Radiation sensor with photo-thermal gain |
| 6934906, | Jul 08 1999 | AT&T Corporation | Methods and apparatus for integrating external applications into an MPEG-4 scene |
| 6970513, | Jun 05 2001 | AT&T Corp. | System for content adaptive video decoding |
| 6978421, | Jun 19 1994 | Handwriting text input system | |
| 7003446, | Mar 07 2000 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Grammar-based automatic data completion and suggestion for user input |
| 7224409, | Jan 21 2002 | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. | Channel tuning method and television using channel name auto completion function |
| 7322023, | May 27 1997 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC | Computer programming language statement building and information tool with non obstructing passive assist window |
| 20010000962, | |||
| 20010027468, | |||
| 20020067377, | |||
| 20020087279, | |||
| 20030137605, | |||
| 20040021691, | |||
| 20050198144, | |||
| 20050210402, | |||
| 20050223308, | |||
| 20060265208, | |||
| 20070188472, | |||
| EP352377, | |||
| EP472444, | |||
| EP643357, | |||
| EP844570, | |||
| EP844571, | |||
| EP858023, | |||
| EP982676, | |||
| JP10105324, | |||
| JP10154033, | |||
| JP10154144, | |||
| JP10333818, | |||
| JP11143614, | |||
| JP11167569, | |||
| RE32773, | Apr 21 1986 | Method of creating text using a computer | |
| WO195095, | |||
| WO233527, | |||
| WO2004107101, | |||
| WO9609579, | |||
| WO9811480, | |||
| WO9928811, |
| Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
| Jan 13 2005 | 602531 British Columbia Ltd. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
| Jan 13 2005 | KNAVEN, PETER | 602531 BRITISH COLUMBIA LTD , | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 016554 | /0135 |
| Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
| Mar 17 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
| May 31 2021 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
| Oct 07 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
| Oct 07 2021 | M1555: 7.5 yr surcharge - late pmt w/in 6 mo, Large Entity. |
| Date | Maintenance Schedule |
| Oct 08 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 08 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 08 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
| Oct 08 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
| Oct 08 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 08 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 08 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
| Oct 08 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
| Oct 08 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
| Apr 08 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
| Oct 08 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
| Oct 08 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |