Methods for segmented programming, program verify, and memory devices are disclosed. One such method for programming includes biasing memory cells with a programming voltage and program verifying the memory cells with a plurality of ramped voltage signal segments, wherein each ramped voltage signal segment has a different start voltage and a different end voltage than the other ramped voltage signal segments.
|
12. An apparatus comprising:
memory cells; and
a controller configured to control execution of a method comprising:
programming a first segment of the memory cells with a first segment of data, wherein a first ramped voltage signal segment is used to verify whether the first segment of the memory cells is programmed with the first segment of data; and
programming a second segment of the memory cells with a second segment of data, wherein a second ramped voltage signal segment is used to verify whether the second segment of the memory cells is programmed with the second segment of data.
1. A method of programming memory cells comprising:
programming a first segment of memory cells with a first segment of data, wherein a first ramped voltage signal segment is used to verify whether the first segment of memory cells is programmed with the first segment of data; and
programming a second segment of memory cells with a second segment of data, wherein a second ramped voltage signal segment is used to verify whether the second segment of memory cells is programmed with the second segment of data,
wherein the first ramped voltage signal segment is different than the second ramped voltage signal segment.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
11. The method of
13. The apparatus of
14. The apparatus of
15. The apparatus of
16. The apparatus of
17. The apparatus of
18. The apparatus of
19. The apparatus of
20. The apparatus of
|
This is a continuation of U.S. patent Ser. No. 12/968,714, titled “METHODS FOR SEGMENTED PROGRAMMING AND MEMORY DEVICES”, filed Dec. 15, 2010 (allowed), which is commonly assigned and incorporated herein by reference.
The present embodiments relate generally to memory and a particular embodiment relates to programming of a memory.
Flash memory devices have developed into a popular source of non-volatile memory for a wide range of electronic applications. Flash memory devices typically use a one-transistor memory cell that allows for high memory densities, high reliability, and low power consumption. Common uses for flash memory include personal computers, flash drives, digital cameras, and cellular telephones. Program code and system data such as a basic input/output system (BIOS) are typically stored in flash memory devices for use in personal computer systems.
A typical flash memory device is a type of memory in which the array of memory cells is typically organized into memory blocks that can be erased and reprogrammed on block-by-block basis instead of one byte at a time. Changes in a threshold voltage of each of the memory cells, through erasing or programming of a charge storage structure (e.g., floating gate or charge trap) or other physical phenomena (e.g., phase change or polarization), determine the data value of each cell. The data in a cell of this type is determined by the presence or absence of the charge in the charge storage structure.
A programming operation typically comprises a series of incrementally increasing programming pulses that are applied to a control gate of a memory cell being programmed. A program verify operation after each programming pulse can determine the threshold voltage of the memory cell resulting from the preceding programming pulse.
The program verify operation can comprise applying a ramped voltage signal on the control gate of the memory cell being programmed. When the ramped voltage signal reaches the threshold voltage to which the memory cell has been programmed, the memory cell turns on and sense circuitry detects a current on a data line (e.g., bit line) coupled to the memory cell.
The ramped voltage signal for each program verify operation covers the entire Vt voltage range for the memory cell. For example, if an erased threshold voltage for the memory cell can go as low as −3V and a programmed threshold voltage as high as 5V, the ramped voltage signal will start at −3V and increase to 5V. Thus, each programming operation includes the programming pulse time plus the time to generate the entire program verify ramped voltage signal. Performing such a programming operation on each memory cell of a memory block can use a large amount of time and create a performance bottleneck in a memory system.
For the reasons stated above, and for other reasons that will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading and understanding the present specification, there is a need in the art for a more efficient programming operation.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof and in which is shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments. In the drawings, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
A ramped voltage generator circuit 100 is coupled to the memory array 101. The ramped voltage generator circuit 100 is responsible for generating the ramped voltage signals that are applied to control gates of memory cells via selected word lines during a program verify operation. As described subsequently in greater detail, when the ramped voltage signal increases to the threshold voltage of a selected memory cell to which it is applied, that memory cell is activated and causes a current to flow on a bit line coupled to the selected memory cell. This current is detected by sense circuitry in order to determine the threshold voltage to which the selected memory cell is programmed.
The ramped voltage generator circuit 100 includes a counter 110 that is coupled to a digital-to-analog converter (DAC) 111. The counter 110 counts transitions of a clock input CLK and outputs the count to the digital-to-analog converter 111 that converts the count to an analog ramped voltage signal. The analog ramped voltage signal is input to a buffer 112 that can provide one or more of current gain, voltage gain, and/or electrical impedance transformation from the ramped voltage generator circuit 100 to the memory array 101.
The range of DAC 111 can be defined by Vstart and Vstop to cover the intended Vt range of a ramped voltage signal segment generated by ramped voltage generator circuit 100. The Vstart and Vstop signals can be generated on the same chip (not shown) as the program verify circuit.
Generation of the ramp voltage signal segment can be initiated by turning on CLK to the counter 110. This event can be controlled by a state machine (not shown), which can also be on the same chip as the program verify circuit. Once the ramped voltage signal segment is completed, such as when the counter 110 reaches its maximum count, a signal called “RAMP_DONE” is generated from circuit 100 and sent back to the state machine (not shown) to indicate that the ramped voltage signal segment has reached its stop voltage, Vstop.
In the embodiment of
The peripheral circuitry 105 (e.g., page buffers) includes, in one embodiment, sense circuitry, latches, and comparators. The peripheral circuitry 105 is also coupled to the memory array 101 through, for example, the bit lines. More detailed operation of the peripheral circuitry 105 will be discussed subsequently.
The memory array 201 comprises an array of non-volatile memory cells (e.g., floating gate) arranged in columns such as series strings 204, 205. Each of the cells is coupled drain to source in each series string 204, 205. An access line (e.g. word line) WL0-WL31 that spans across multiple series strings 204, 205 is coupled to the control gates of each memory cell in a row in order to bias the control gates of the memory cells in the row. Data lines, such as even/odd bit lines BL_E, BL_O, are coupled to the series strings and eventually coupled to sense circuitry that detect the state of each cell by sensing current or voltage on a selected bit line.
Each series string 204, 205 of memory cells is coupled to a source line 206 by a source select gate 216, 217 (e.g., transistor) and to an individual bit line BL_E, BL_O by a drain select gate 212, 213 (e.g., transistor). The source select gates 216, 217 are controlled by a source select gate control line SG(S) 218 coupled to their control gates. The drain select gates 212, 213 are controlled by a drain select gate control line SG(D) 214.
Each memory cell can be programmed as a single level cell (SLC) or a multiple level cell (MLC). Each cell's threshold voltage (Vt) is indicative of the data value of that cell. For example, in an SLC, a Vt of 2.5V might indicate a programmed cell while a Vt of −0.5V might indicate an erased cell. An MLC uses multiple Vt ranges that each indicates a different state. Multilevel cells can take advantage of the analog nature of a traditional flash cell by assigning a bit pattern to a specific Vt range. This technology permits the storage of data values representing two or more bits per cell, depending on the quantity of Vt ranges assigned to the cell.
The amount of time to program a memory cell can include the time for the programming pulse plus the time to accomplish the program verify operation after each programming pulse. Each time a memory cell experiences a programming pulse, its threshold voltage can be increased. Therefore, using the same ramped voltage signal each time a memory cell is program verified can waste time.
A segmented program verify operation segments (e.g., divides) the program verify ramped voltage signal into multiple segments.
Each of the three segments 301-303 overlaps with an adjacent segment. For example, the first ramped voltage signal segment 301 has a start voltage of −2V and increases to a stop voltage of 0.5V over a 12.8 μs time period. The second ramped voltage signal segment 302 has a start voltage of 0V and increases to a stop voltage of 2.5V over its respective 12.8 μs time period. The third ramped voltage signal segment 303 has a start voltage of 2V and increases to a stop voltage of 4.5V over its respective 12.8 μs time period. Overlapping a segment with an adjacent segment can increase the possibility that all threshold voltages experienced by the memory cells being programmed are covered by the multiple segments.
The range of each ramped voltage signal segment (e.g., the difference between the stop voltage and the start voltage) can be chosen based on a size of predicted distributions of threshold voltages for memory cells resulting from each programming pulse. For example, if the predicted distribution of threshold voltages for memory cells resulting from each programming pulse is less than 2.5V, then the range of each of the segments 301-303 can be chosen to be 2.5V.
Even with the overlapping segments, it is still possible that a slow programming memory cell might not be verifiable within any of the segments. In such a case, error correction coding might be used to correct the reading of these memory cells. Thus, the number of segments into which a conventional ramped voltage signal 300 is segmented (e.g., broken down) can be a trade-off between the number of memory cells verifiable by the segmented program verify operation and the number of memory cells correctable by the error correction coding.
The number of segments can also be determined by the memory technology. For example, one memory technology might respond to a programming pulse differently than another such that threshold voltage distributions might be wider with one technology than the other. Wider threshold voltage distributions could typically use fewer segments.
Each segment 301-303 illustrated in
In one embodiment, the ramp rate of each segment should remain the same as a conventional (non-segmented) ramp rate. This can result in a more easily computed threshold voltage during a read operation due to error correction performed in response to the resistance-capacitance (RC) of each word line. Since a typical word line might be coupled to thousands of memory cells, the RC of each word line can cause the voltage applied to the one end of the word line to be delayed in reaching the other end of the word line. When the ramped voltage signal is a certain voltage on one end of the word line, the actual Vt count that is latched is not delayed and can indicate a different voltage than what actually activated the memory cell. During a programming operation, this difference is compensated by a known offset that is added to data being programmed into memory cells that are furthest from where the ramped voltage signal is applied. This offset takes into account the distance from the applied voltage as well as the ramp rate of the ramped voltage signal. If the ramp rate for the ramped voltage signal segments is different than a conventional ramp rate, different offsets will need to be determined to compensate for the RC error.
The method depicted in
Since voltage level L0 (e.g., erased state) will not be programmed, memory cells that are to remain at the L0 voltage level will be inhibited from programming. In one embodiment, inhibit data (e.g., logical zeros) are loaded into the page buffer for these memory cells. This instructs the memory control circuitry to inhibit programming of these cells. The following discussions of
Referring to
The programming comprises biasing the control gates of the first segment memory cells with an initial programming pulse 404 that has an initial programming voltage. A program verify operation is then performed with the first segment ramped voltage 405. One example of such a ramped voltage 301 is illustrated in
If the program verify does not indicate that the particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells of the second and/or third segment have been successfully programmed, the programming pulse count is incremented again (e.g., increment programming voltage) and the memory cells biased for another programming operation 409. The incremented programming pulses and program verify are repeated 405, 406, 409 until the particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells of the second and/or third segment have been successfully programmed or it is determined that a memory cell cannot be programmed, thus resulting in an error condition.
The top plot 501 of
The top plot 501 shows the memory cells that were either program inhibited (e.g., L0), have been programmed to their target threshold voltages corresponding to the user data (e.g., L1 and L2), or that have not yet reached their target voltage corresponding to the user data (e.g., distribution 510) after the first segment of the programming operation.
The distributions 510 and 520 illustrated in
The second segment of the depicted programming operation, illustrated in
Starting at the start voltage of the first ramped voltage signal segment would not be efficient since the second segment memory cells have already been programmed to the highest threshold voltage of the first segment. Thus, the programming pulse count N, determined at the end of the first segment programming operation is incremented (e.g., N+1) and the voltage represented by this programming pulse number is applied to the control gates of the memory cells 414.
A program verify operation is then performed with the second ramped voltage signal segment 415. One example of such a ramped voltage signal segment is illustrated in
It is then determined whether a particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells of the second segment have passed the program verify operation 416. This can be accomplished by sense circuitry detecting current flow in a bit line from the activated memory cells. Determining whether a particular number of the memory cells of the second segment have passed the program verify operation is dictated by fast-to-program cells in the second segment. If the particular number of memory cells of the second segment pass the program verify operation 415, the programming pulse count M is determined. The third segment of the depicted programming operation is then executed 418.
If the program verify does not indicate that the particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells of the third segment have been successfully programmed, the programming pulse count is incremented again (e.g., increment programming voltage) and the memory cells biased for another programming operation 419. The incremented programming pulses and program verify are repeated 415, 416, 419 until the particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells of the third segment have been successfully programmed or it is determined that a memory cell cannot be programmed, thus resulting in an error condition.
The middle plot 502 of
The third segment of the depicted programming operation, illustrated in
The programming pulse count M, determined at the end of the second segment of the programming operation, is incremented (e.g., M+1) and the voltage represented by this programming pulse number is used to bias the memory cells 424.
A program verify operation is then performed with the third ramped voltage signal segment 425. One example of such a ramped voltage signal segment is illustrated in
It is then determined whether no more than a particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells have failed program verify 426. Determining whether no more than a particular number of the memory cells have failed the program verify operation is dictated by the slow-to-program cells, and can correspond to a conventional way to indicate completion of programming. This can be accomplished by sense circuitry failing to detect current flow in a bit line.
If the program verify does not indicate that no more than a particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells have failed program verify, the programming pulse count is incremented again (e.g., increment programming voltage) and the memory cells biased for another programming operation 429. The incremented programming pulses and program verify are repeated 425, 426, 429 until no more than the particular number (e.g., 10) of the memory cells have failed program verify or it is determined that a memory cell cannot be programmed, thus resulting in an error condition.
The lower plot 503 of
The programming operation depicted in
The memory device 600 includes an array 101 of memory cells (e.g., non-volatile memory cells). The memory array 101 is arranged in banks of word line rows and bit line columns. In one embodiment, the columns of the memory array 101 comprise series strings of memory cells.
Address buffer circuitry 640 is provided to latch address signals provided through I/O circuitry 660. Address signals are received and decoded by a row decoder 644 and a column decoder 646 to access the memory array 101.
The memory device 600 reads data in the memory array 101 by sensing voltage or current changes in the memory array columns using sense amplifier circuitry 650. The sense amplifier circuitry 650, in one embodiment, is coupled to read and latch a row of data from the memory array 101. Data input and output buffer circuitry 660 is included for bidirectional data communication as well as the address communication over a plurality of data connections 662 with the controller 610. Write circuitry 655 is provided to write data to the memory array.
Memory control circuitry 670 decodes signals provided on control connections 672 from the processor 610. These signals are used to control the operations on the memory array 101, including data read, data write (program), and erase operations. The memory control circuitry 670 may be a state machine, a sequencer, or some other type of controller to generate the memory control signals. In one embodiment, the memory control circuitry 670 is configured to control execution of one or more of the segmented programming methods of the present disclosure.
The memory device illustrated in
In summary, one or more embodiments of the segmented programming methods can provide a faster program verify operation during programming. Instead of using the typical prior art single program verify ramped voltage signal for each program verify operation, a program verify ramped voltage is segmented into a plurality of ramped voltage signal segments, each starting and ending at different verify voltages. A segment of memory cells is then programmed (e.g., programming pulses and program verify operation) until the verify is successful and the next segment is then programmed (e.g., lowest segment to highest segment or highest segment to lowest segment).
Although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated by those of ordinary skill in the art that any arrangement that is calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. Many adaptations of the invention will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Accordingly, this application is intended to cover any adaptations or variations of the invention.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9437318, | Oct 24 2014 | SanDisk Technologies LLC | Adaptive program pulse duration based on temperature |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
6859395, | Nov 29 2002 | Kioxia Corporation | NAND type flash EEPROM in which sequential programming process is performed by using different intermediate voltages |
7280398, | Aug 31 2006 | Round Rock Research, LLC | System and memory for sequential multi-plane page memory operations |
7525849, | Feb 13 2007 | Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology, Inc.; Elite Semiconductor Memory Technology Inc | Flash memory with sequential programming |
7656710, | Jul 14 2005 | SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO , LTD | Adaptive operations for nonvolatile memories |
7751253, | Mar 17 2008 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Analog sensing of memory cells with a source follower driver in a semiconductor memory device |
8023334, | Oct 31 2008 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Program window adjust for memory cell signal line delay |
8345482, | Dec 15 2010 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Methods for segmented programming and memory devices |
20080205140, | |||
20080259684, | |||
20090052238, | |||
20100142267, | |||
20110242900, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 20 2012 | Micron Technology, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 26 2016 | Micron Technology, Inc | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REPLACE ERRONEOUSLY FILED PATENT #7358718 WITH THE CORRECT PATENT #7358178 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038669 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST | 043079 | /0001 | |
Apr 26 2016 | Micron Technology, Inc | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT | 038954 | /0001 | |
Apr 26 2016 | Micron Technology, Inc | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 038669 | /0001 | |
Jun 29 2018 | U S BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Micron Technology, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047243 | /0001 | |
Jul 03 2018 | MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047540 | /0001 | |
Jul 03 2018 | Micron Technology, Inc | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 047540 | /0001 | |
Jul 31 2019 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | MICRON SEMICONDUCTOR PRODUCTS, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051028 | /0001 | |
Jul 31 2019 | JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Micron Technology, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 051028 | /0001 | |
Jul 31 2019 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Micron Technology, Inc | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050937 | /0001 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Sep 16 2013 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Mar 23 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Mar 30 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Oct 08 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Apr 08 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 08 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Oct 08 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Oct 08 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Apr 08 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 08 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Oct 08 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Oct 08 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Apr 08 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Oct 08 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Oct 08 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |