A method and a hearing system for adaptively matching microphones (3, 4) of a hearing system. The method comprising the steps of determining a true direction towards a sound source, determining an estimated direction towards the sound source using microphones (3, 4) of the hearing system, comparing the true direction with the estimated direction to obtain a correction factor, applying the correction factor to the signals of the microphones (3, 4) of the hearing system in order to reduce a difference between the true direction and a corrected estimated direction obtained via corrected microphone signals.
|
1. A method for adaptively matching microphones of a hearing system, the method comprising the steps of:
determining a true direction towards a sound source,
determining an estimated direction towards the sound source using microphones of the hearing system,
comparing the true direction with the estimated direction to obtain a correction factor,
applying the correction factor to the signals of the microphones of the hearing system in order to reduce a difference between the true direction and a corrected estimated direction obtained via corrected microphone signals.
11. A hearing system comprising:
at least two microphones generating input signals,
means for determining a true direction towards a sound source,
means for determining an estimated direction towards the sound source using at least two of the at least two microphones,
means for comparing the true direction with the estimated direction to obtain a correction factor,
means for applying the correction factor to the input signals of the microphones in order to reduce a difference between the true direction and a corrected estimated direction obtained via corrected input signals.
2. The method of
3. The method of
4. The method of
5. The method of
6. The method of
7. The method of
8. The method of
9. The method of
10. The method of
12. The hearing system of
13. The hearing system of
14. The hearing system of
15. The hearing system of
a binaural hearing device with at least two microphones to be matched,
an ipsi-lateral microphone and a co-lateral microphone are used to determine the true direction.
16. The hearing system of
17. The hearing system of
18. The hearing system of
19. The hearing system of
|
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to a method for adaptively matching microphones of a hearing system as well as to a hearing system.
(2) Description of Related Art Including Information Disclosed Under 37 CFR 1.97 and 1.98
Not Applicable
Hearing systems utilize two microphones to do beamforming. Beamforming is known as a very effective way to improve speech intelligibility for hearing impaired persons wearing a hearing system. To enable effective beamforming, the microphones resp. the signal paths up to a beamformer processing unit have to be well matched in phase and magnitude over the frequency range of interest.
Unfortunately, the available microphones are not sufficiently matched in phase to achieve a satisfactory beamforming performance at low frequencies without further matching methods. Common deviations are up to 80 μs group delay difference at low frequencies, i.e. at 100 Hz. In order to obtain a satisfactory result when using a beamformer, the group delay difference must be below 10 μs, preferably even below 5 μs.
Known methods that try to improve a beamformer algorithm by microphone matching use a standard procedure or a model of a possible error situation. Wrong assumption for the model or insufficient models result in an imprecise beamformer.
In this connection, reference is made to U.S. Pat. No. 7,027,607, U.S. Pat. No. 7,155,019, U.S. Pat. No. 6,385,323, US-2007/0183610 A1, US-2007/0258597 A1, US-2005/0244018 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,272,229.
Therefore, it is one object of the present invention to provide a method for matching microphones that does at least not have one of the disadvantages of known solutions.
The present invention is defined by the steps of claim 1. Further embodiments as well as a hearing system are defined in further claims.
The present invention is first directed to a method for adaptively matching microphones of a hearing system, the method comprising the steps of:
Thereby, the performance of the beamformer can be improved to a large extent. This is in particular true with regard to the low frequency behavior of the beamformer. In addition, static calibration methods to match the microphones in production or during the fitting process can be avoided.
In an embodiment of the method according to the present invention, the step of determining the true direction comprises limiting a first frequency range to a section in which a good matching of the microphones is expected, the first frequency range being in particular above 1 kHz.
In further embodiments of the method according to the present invention, the step of determining an estimated direction comprises limiting a second frequency range to a section in which the matching of the microphones is to be improved, the second frequency range being in particular below 1 kHz.
In further embodiments of the method according to the present invention, the hearing system comprises a single hearing device with at least two microphones to be matched.
In still further embodiments of the method according to the present invention, the hearing system comprises a binaural hearing device with at least two microphones to be matched, and wherein an ipsi-lateral microphone and a co-lateral microphone are used in the step of determining the true direction.
In further embodiments of the method according to the present invention, two ipsi-lateral microphones are used in the step of determining an estimated direction.
Further embodiments of the method according to the present invention further comprise the step of checking whether a single sound source is present, particularly having at least a predefined signal-to-noise ratio.
In further embodiments of the method according to the present invention, a speech detector is used to determine whether a single broadband sound source is present. With the speech detector, a single sound source can easily be determined. Such a sound source is sufficiently broadband and originates from a single location. Therefore, it can very be used for adapting the microphones.
In still further embodiments of the method according to the present invention, all steps are performed during regular operation of the hearing system.
Furthermore, the present invention is directed to a hearing system comprising:
In an embodiment of the hearing system according to the present invention, the means for determining the true direction comprise frequency limiting means for limiting a first frequency range to a section in which a good matching of the microphones is expected, the first frequency range being in particular above 1 kHz.
In further embodiments of the hearing system according to the present invention, the means for determining the estimated direction comprise frequency limiting means for limiting a second frequency range to a section in which the matching of the microphones is to be improved, the second frequency range being in particular below 1 kHz.
Further embodiments of the hearing system according to the present invention comprise a single hearing device with at least two microphones to be matched.
Further embodiments of the hearing system according to the present invention comprise
Further embodiments of the hearing system according to the present invention comprise two ipsi-lateral microphones to determine the estimated direction.
Still further embodiments of the hearing system according to the present invention further comprise means for checking whether a single sound source is present, particularly having at least a predefined signal-to-noise ratio.
Further embodiments of the hearing system according to the present invention comprise a speech detector is used to determine whether a single broadband sound source is present.
It is pointed out that the present invention is directed to every possible combination of the above-mentioned embodiments. Only those combinations are excluded which would result in a contradiction.
The present invention will be further described in the following by referring to drawings showing exemplified embodiments of the present invention.
In a first embodiment, the present invention makes use of the knowledge that the two microphones 3 and 4 are well matched in a first frequency range, e.g. frequencies above 1 kHz. Whenever a single sound source 2 is present having a sufficiently broad spectrum, i.e. a frequency range that encompasses at least a section of the first frequency range as well as a second frequency range, in which microphone matching must be performed, a true direction tDOA of the sound source 2 in relation to the position of the hearing system user 1 can be determined in the first frequency range. Due to the fact that the microphones 3 and 4 are well matched in the first frequency range, the true direction tDOA determined in this first frequency range can be regarded as precise.
In a further step, an estimated direction eDOA is determined in the second frequency range using the same microphones 3 and 4. Provided that the sound source 2 is still at the same location, a correction factor α is obtained by comparing the true direction tDOA and the estimated direction eDOA, the correction factor α being a measure of how well the microphones 3 and 4 are matched in the second frequency range. By applying the correction factor α in the signal path between the microphones 3, 4 and a beamforming unit in the second frequency range, the microphones 3 and 4 can be regarded as sufficiently matched over the entire frequency range.
In a further embodiment of the present invention, it is checked whether a single sound source 2 is present in order to obtain improved matching results for the microphones 3 and 4. Thereby, the following criterions must be fulfilled:
Speech in a quiet surrounding is a sound source 2 that fulfills the requirement of being sufficiently broadband and, in addition, has a sufficiently high signal-to-noise or SNR ratio over the background noise. Therefore, and in a further embodiment of the present invention, a speech detector is applied that is used to detect this favorable sound source for the matching process. Speech detectors are well known in the art and are known to be reliable. Once a speech detector has detected a single speech source as sound source 2, the true direction tDOA is determined at mid frequencies, i.e. in the first frequency range defined by 1 to 4 kHz, for example. From knowing that this sound source 2 originates from a single source, namely the mouth of the person speaking, it can be inferred that the incoming sound energy at lower frequencies, i.e. in the second frequency range, comes from the same direction, namely the true direction tDOA. The effectively measured estimated direction eDOA in the second frequency range can now get corrected by the correction factor α leading to the same direction as measured in the first frequency range. The correction itself can be performed by applying a suitable filter in time domain or frequency domain in front of a beamformer or within the beamformer itself or before/within any signal processing algorithm being sensitive to phase mismatching of the input sources. Such algorithms include source localization methods, for example, utilizing a cross correlation or mutual time delay of the microphone signals, respectively.
In the following, an example is given for a monaural hearing system with a microphone distance of 10 mm. In case a sound source 2—e.g. a speech source—is detected in the first frequency range with a true direction tDOA of 0°. A signal arrival delay between the microphones 3 and 4 is obtained by
The same sound source 2 is detected in the second frequency range, e.g. at 300 Hz with a time delay of 44 μs. A corresponding correction factor α of 44 μs−29 μs=15 μs bias time delay has to get applied to the front microphone in this frequency band. Such a bias time delay corresponds to a phase shift of approximately 1.6° at 300 Hz. This phase shift can now get implemented with an allpass filter, in the frequency domain by multiplication of the audio signal with a complex exponential function or with another suitable filter. If the measured arrival delay is smaller than 29 μs, the corresponding correction factor α may get applied on the back microphone signal.
The above-mentioned processing steps are further described by referring to
It is clear to the skilled in the art that the block diagram of
The frequency band separation in the frequency separation unit 8 can be done by time domain filters, a Fourier transform (FFT) or other suitable methods. Similarly, the level and phase matching in the correction unit 9 as well as the beamforming algorithm in the beamformer unit 11 can be performed in time domain or in frequency domain.
Thus, by utilizing the contra-lateral microphone 3, 5 and 4, 6, respectively, the hearing system computes the location of the sound source 2 for each frequency band of interest (e.g. for all bands<1 kHz) and each time slot. If a sound source 2 is present in front of the hearing system user 1, i.e. at 0°±10° than the monaural phase matching algorithm is computed with the knowledge of the known true direction tDOA. The time constant of the actual phase matching algorithm can still be slow, i.e. in the order of hours or even days to account for the slow changes in phase matching without introducing unwanted oscillations. Thus, such measurement or correction values can also get stored in a non-volatile memory and used as initialization values after initializing or boot-up of the hearing system.
The above-mentioned processing steps are further described by referring to
It is to be noted that in the method used in connection with monaural hearing systems as well as in the method used in connection with binaural hearing systems, the beamforming may contain a forward looking cardioid (with a null direction towards 180°) and a blocking matrix (backward facing cardioid) with a null direction towards 0°.
Due to local effects of wearing a beamformer close to the head of the hearing system user, the microphone signals for the forward looking cardioid and the backward facing cardioid have to be matched differently. Thus, the method explained in relation to the monaural hearing system may not only use a “speech from front” detector, but additionally or alternatively also a “speech from back” detector. Likewise, the method explained in relation to the binaural hearing system may have an additional or alternative output indicating signals from 180°±10° incidence direction controlling a second path within the level—and phase matching block for the two different cardioids.
An additional advantage of the method explained in relation to the binaural hearing system is that not only the two ipsi-lateral microphones can get matched when the true direction tDOA indicates a signal from the front and/or the back, but that the contra-lateral microphones can also get matched to the ipsi-lateral ones when a signal from the front or from the back are detected.
Kramer, Michael, Roeck, Hans-Ueli
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9565499, | Apr 19 2013 | SIVANTOS PTE LTD | Binaural hearing aid system for compensation of microphone deviations based on the wearer's own voice |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
5029215, | Dec 29 1989 | AT&T Bell Laboratories | Automatic calibrating apparatus and method for second-order gradient microphone |
6272229, | Aug 03 1999 | Topholm & Westermann ApS | Hearing aid with adaptive matching of microphones |
6385323, | May 15 1998 | Sivantos GmbH | Hearing aid with automatic microphone balancing and method for operating a hearing aid with automatic microphone balancing |
7027607, | Sep 22 2000 | GN ReSound A/S | Hearing aid with adaptive microphone matching |
7155019, | Mar 14 2000 | Ototronix, LLC | Adaptive microphone matching in multi-microphone directional system |
7346176, | May 11 2000 | Plantronics, Inc | Auto-adjust noise canceling microphone with position sensor |
20030142836, | |||
20050244018, | |||
20070183610, | |||
20070258597, | |||
EP1489883, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Jan 29 2010 | Phonak AG | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Feb 24 2010 | KRAMER, MICHAEL | Phonak AG | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024360 | /0845 | |
Feb 25 2010 | ROECK, HANS-UELI | Phonak AG | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 024360 | /0845 | |
Jul 10 2015 | Phonak AG | Sonova AG | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 036674 | /0492 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
May 19 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
May 19 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Nov 19 2016 | 4 years fee payment window open |
May 19 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 19 2017 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Nov 19 2019 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Nov 19 2020 | 8 years fee payment window open |
May 19 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 19 2021 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Nov 19 2023 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Nov 19 2024 | 12 years fee payment window open |
May 19 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Nov 19 2025 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Nov 19 2027 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |