System and method for determining health indicators for impellers

System and method for determining health indicators for impellers
US8620622

A system includes a plurality of sensors configured to measure one or more characteristics of an impeller. The system also includes an impeller condition indicator device, which includes a plurality of sensor interfaces configured to receive input signals associated with at least one stage of the impeller from the sensors. The impeller condition indicator device also includes a processor configured to identify a fault in the impeller using the input signals and an output interface configured to provide an indicator identifying the fault. The processor is configured to identify the fault by determining a family of frequencies related to at least one failure mode of the impeller, decomposing the input signals using the family of frequencies, reconstructing a impeller signal using the decomposed input signals, and comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal. The family of frequencies includes a vane pass frequency and its harmonics.

PTO Wrapper PDF
Dossier Espace Google

Patent 8620622
Priority Apr 02 2009
Filed Apr 02 2009
Issued Dec 31 2013
Expiry Oct 27 2029 Extension 208 days
Inventors Kar, Chinm…
Assg.orig Honeywell … Honeywell …
Assg.curr Honeywell … Honeywell …
Entity Large
Referenced by 1
References 71
Maint.: currently ok

TECHNICAL FIELD
BACKGROUND
SUMMARY
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF…
DETAILED DESCRIPTION

1. An apparatus comprising:

an input interface configured to receive an input signal associated with at least one stage of an impeller and with two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller;

a processor configured to identify a specific failure mode in the impeller using the input signal; and

an output interface configured to provide an indicator identifying a health of the impeller;

wherein the processor is configured to identify the specific failure mode by:

determining a family of frequencies related to at least one of the two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller, the family of frequencies including a vane pass frequency and its harmonics;

decomposing the input signal by performing a transform of the input signal and isolating components of the transformed input signal into selected frequency bands;

reconstructing an impeller signal using portions of the decomposed input signal within the selected frequency bands associated with the family of frequencies;

comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal; and

categorizing the comparison based on failure mode rules including effects that the specific failure mode has on the two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller.

15. A method for identifying a health of an impeller corresponding to a specific failure mode of the impeller, the method comprising:

receiving at one or more processing devices an input signal comprising at least one of vibration and speed infonnation corresponding to at least one stage of the impeller, the input signal associated with two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller;

determining a family of frequencies corresponding to at least one of the two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller, the family of frequencies including a vane pass frequency and its harmonics;

decomposing the input signal by performing a transform of the input signal and isolating components of the transformed input signal into selected frequency bands;

reconstructing an impeller signal using portions of the decomposed input signal within the selected frequency bands associated with the family of frequencies;

comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal;

categorizing the comparison based on failure mode rules including effects that the specific failure mode has on the two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller;

outputting an indicator identifying the health of the impeller; and

in response to determining the reconstructed impeller signal differs from the baseline signal by a threshold amount, outputting an indicator identifying a fault.

9. A system comprising:

a plurality of sensors configured to measure one or more characteristics of an impeller; and

an impeller condition indicator device comprising:

an input interface configured to receive input signals from the sensors, each of the input signals associated with at least one stage of the impeller and with two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller;

a processor configured to identify a specific failure mode in the impeller using the input signals; and

an output interface configured to provide an indicator identifying a health of the impeller;

wherein the processor is configured to identify the specific failure mode by, for each of the input signals:

decomposing the input signal by performing a transform of the input signal and isolating components of the transformed input signal into selected frequency bands;

reconstructing an impeller signal using portions of the decomposed input signal within the selected frequency bands associated with the family of frequencies;

comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal; and

categorizing the comparison based on failure mode rules including effects that the specific failure mode has on the two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the two or more frequencies associated with operation of the impeller comprise the vane pass frequency, a rotating shaft speed frequency, a shaft sideband frequency, and a background noise frequency; and

the reconstructed impeller signal comprises at least one of:

a signal associated with the vane pass frequency and its harmonics;

a signal associated with the rotating shaft speed frequency;

a signal associated with the shaft sideband frequency; and

a signal associated with the background noise frequency.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is configured to decompose the input signal through a plurality of band-pass filters.

4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein the processor is configured to reconstruct the impeller signal by:

determining maximum and minimum amplitudes in the selected frequency bands in outputs of the band-pass filters;

combining the maximum amplitudes to produce a first matrix;

combining the minimum amplitudes to produce a second matrix; and

reconstructing multiple impeller signals using the first and second matrices.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor further is configured to:

normalize the reconstructed signal with the baseline signal; and

apply a feature fusion technique to obtain a value for use by the indicator.

6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the processor is further configured to store a portion of the input signal, corresponding to normal operation of the impeller, as the baseline signal.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the indicator identifying the health of the impeller comprises at least one of: an impeller wear indicator, an impeller crack indicator, a cavitation indicator, and an impeller health indicator.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein:

the input signal comprises at least one of: vibration information in a time domain and speed information in the time domain associated with the impeller;

the input interface comprises multiple input interfaces; and

the processor comprises an artificial intelligence portion, and

the reconstructed impeller signal comprises a time domain signal.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein:

the reconstructed impeller signal comprises at least one of:

a signal associated with the vane pass frequency and its harmonics;

a signal associated with the rotating shaft speed frequency;

a signal associated with the shaft sideband frequency; and

a signal associated with the background noise frequency.

11. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is configured to, for each of the input signals, decompose the input signal through a plurality of band-pass filters.

12. The system of claim 11, wherein the processor is configured to reconstruct the impeller signal by:

determining maximum and minimum amplitudes in the selected frequency bands in outputs of the band-pass filters;

combining the maximum amplitudes to produce a first matrix;

combining the minimum amplitudes to produce a second matrix; and

reconstructing multiple impeller signals using the first and second matrices.

13. The system of claim 9, wherein the processor is further configured to store a portion of each of the input signals, corresponding to normal operation of the impeller, as the baseline signal.

14. The system of claim 9, wherein the indicator identifying the health of the impeller comprises at least one of: an impeller wear indicator, an impeller crack indicator, a cavitation indicator, and an impeller health indicator.

16. The method of claim 15, wherein:

the reconstructed impeller signal comprises at least one of:

a signal associated with the vane pass frequency and its harmonics;

a signal associated with the rotating shaft speed frequency;

a signal associated with the shaft sideband frequency; and

a signal associated with the background noise frequency.

17. The method of claim 15, wherein decomposing the input signal comprises decomposing the input signal through a plurality of band-pass filters; and

wherein reconstructing the impeller signal comprises:

determining maximum and minimum amplitudes in the selected frequency bands in outputs of the band-pass filters;

combining the maximum amplitudes to produce a first matrix;

combining the minimum amplitudes to produce a second matrix; and

reconstructing multiple impeller signals using the first and second matrices.

18. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

normalizing the reconstructed signal with the baseline signal; and

applying a feature fusion technique to obtain a value for use by the indicator.

19. The method of claim 15, further comprising:

storing a portion of the at least one of vibration and speed information corresponding to normal operation of the impeller as the baseline signal.

20. The method of claim 15, wherein the threshold amount comprises a first amount associated with a warning threshold and a second amount associated with an alarm threshold.

21. The method of claim 16, wherein the failure mode rules identify at least one of:

a high flow cavitation failure mode having an increasing effect on the background noise frequency and a decreasing effect on the vane pass frequency;

an impeller wear failure mode having an increasing effect on the shaft sideband frequency and an increasing effect on the vane pass frequency; and

an impeller crack failure mode having an increasing effect on the shaft sideband frequency and a decreasing effect on the vane pass frequency.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This disclosure relates generally to impeller devices and, more specifically, to a system and method for determining health indicators for impellers.

BACKGROUND

Impellers are routinely used in various industries. One type of impeller includes a rotor used to increase the pressure and flow of a fluid inside a cylinder, tube, or other conduit. Impellers are often used, for example, in the process control industry. However, impellers routinely suffer from various failures. Example failure modes of an impeller can include vane breakage, one or more cracks in the impeller, and wear in the impeller.

It is often necessary or desirable to monitor the health of an impeller in a process control system or other system in order to properly schedule maintenance for the impeller. However, it is often difficult to monitor the health of impellers because of the wide variety of impellers in use.

SUMMARY

This disclosure provides a system and method for determining health indicators for impellers.

In a first embodiment, an apparatus includes an input interface configured to receive an input signal associated with at least one stage of an impeller. The apparatus also includes a processor configured to identify a fault in the impeller using the input signal. The apparatus further includes an output interface configured to provide an indicator identifying the fault. The processor is configured to identify the fault by determining a family of frequencies related to at least one failure mode of the impeller, decomposing the input signal using the family of frequencies, reconstructing an impeller signal using the decomposed input signal, and comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal. The family of frequencies includes a vane pass frequency and its harmonics.

In a second embodiment, a system includes a plurality of sensors configured to measure one or more characteristics of an impeller. The system also includes an impeller condition indicator device, which includes a plurality of sensor interfaces configured to receive input signals associated with at least one stage of the impeller from the sensors. The impeller condition indicator device also includes a processor configured to identify a fault in the impeller using the input signals and an output interface configured to provide an indicator identifying the fault. The processor is configured to identify the fault by determining a family of frequencies related to at least one failure mode of the impeller, decomposing the input signals using the family of frequencies, reconstructing an impeller signal using the decomposed input signals, and comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal. The family of frequencies includes a vane pass frequency and its harmonics.

In a third embodiment, a method includes receiving an input signal having vibration and/or speed information corresponding to at least one stage of an impeller. The method also includes determining a family of frequencies corresponding to at least one failure mode of the impeller, where the family of frequencies includes a vane pass frequency and its harmonics. The method further includes decomposing the input signal using the family of frequencies and reconstructing an impeller signal using the decomposed input signal. In addition, the method includes comparing the reconstructed impeller signal to a baseline signal and outputting an indicator identifying a fault when the reconstructed impeller signal differs from the baseline signal by a threshold amount.

Other technical features may be readily apparent to one skilled in the art from the following figures, descriptions, and claims.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of this disclosure, reference is now made to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIGS. 1A through 1G illustrates example impeller configurations;

FIGS. 2A and 2B illustrate example cavitation locations;

FIG. 3 illustrates an example table for impeller failure mode rules according to this disclosure;

FIG. 4 illustrates an example Impeller Condition Indicator (ICI) device according to this disclosure;

FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed view of an example ICI first stage operation for monitoring the health of an impeller according to this disclosure;

FIG. 6 illustrates a more detailed view of an example ICI second stage operation for monitoring the health of an impeller according to this disclosure;

FIG. 7 illustrates an example process for monitoring an impeller according to this disclosure; and

FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate example impeller health indicators according to this disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIGS. 1 through 9, discussed below, and the various embodiments used to describe the principles of the present invention in this patent document are by way of illustration only and should not be construed in any way to limit the scope of the invention. Those skilled in the art will understand that the principles of the invention may be implemented in any type of suitably arranged device or system. Also, it will be understood that elements in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions of some elements in the figures may be exaggerated relative to other elements to help improve the understanding of various embodiments described in this patent document.

FIGS. 1A through 1G illustrates example impeller configurations. In FIGS. 1A through 1D, impellers 100a-100b include a rotor inside a cylinder, tube, or other conduit 105. The rotor is used to increase the pressure and flow of a fluid inside the conduit 105. The conduit 105 includes an open inlet 110 (often referred to as an “eye”) that accepts incoming fluid. Vanes 115 push the fluid radially within the conduit 105. The vanes 115 can, for example, represent backward curved blades 115a, radial blades 115b, or forward inclined blades 115c. A splined, keyed, or threaded bore 120 accepts a driveshaft 125, which causes the vanes 115 to rotate. The impellers 100a-100b can be made of iron, steel, bronze, brass, aluminum, plastic, or other suitable material(s). The impeller 100a represents an axial flow impeller, and the impeller 100b represents a mixed flow impeller.

As shown in FIG. 1E, an impeller 100c also can be used as the rotating component of a centrifugal pump 130. The impeller 100c transfers or converts rotating and/or kinetic energy from a motor that drives the pump 130 into potential energy of the pumped fluid by accelerating the fluid outwards from the center of rotation. The velocity achieved by the impeller 100c translates into pressure when a pump casing 135 confines the outward movement of the fluid.

FIGS. 1F and 1G illustrate additional types of impellers. In particular, FIG. 1F illustrates an open impeller 100d, a semi-open impeller 100e, and a closed impeller 100f. FIG. 1G illustrates a single suction impeller 100g and a double suction impeller 100h.

In addition to selecting a particular type of impeller, the design of the particular impeller can be varied to alter its performance characteristics. For example, an impeller with a large number of vanes or with vanes having large angles may have an increased “head” of the fluid. Also, an impeller with a low number of vanes or with large vane outlet angles may have poor vibration characteristics or heavy loads at the tips. Further, a larger clearance between an impeller and its casing may decrease vibration but result in an increase in size, weight, and cost.

One hydraulic phenomenon associated with the use of impellers is cavitation, which is illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B. Cavitation is a phenomenon where vapor bubbles form in a flowing liquid in or around a region where the pressure of the liquid falls below its vapor pressure. FIG. 2A illustrates cavitation located at the discharge of an impeller, while FIG. 2B illustrates cavitation located at the suction of an impeller.

Cavitation can be divided into two classes of behavior, namely inertial (or transient) cavitation and noninertial cavitation. Inertial cavitation is the process where a void or bubble in a liquid rapidly collapses, producing a shock wave. Noninertial cavitation is the process where a bubble in a fluid is forced to oscillate in size or shape due to some form of energy input, such as an acoustic field. Both types of cavitation can occur when using impellers. Moreover, the shock waves formed by cavitation may be strong enough to significantly damage moving parts, which can facilitate the erosion of an impeller and its casing or other damage to the impeller.

It is often difficult to monitor the health of a number of impellers due, among other things, to the various types of impellers that are in use. In accordance with this disclosure, an impeller health monitoring system is provided that can monitor the health of one or more impellers and provide an indication when a particular impeller is suffering from wear or other problems.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example table 300 for impeller failure mode rules according to this disclosure. The embodiment of the table 300 shown in FIG. 3 is for illustration only. Other embodiments of the table 300 could be used without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

In this example, the table 300 includes five failure conditions. The failure conditions include high flow cavitations 302, low flow cavitations 304, impeller wear 306, impeller cracking 310, and impeller vane breakage 312. The table 300 identifies the effects of these failure conditions on various frequencies associated with operation of the impeller. The impeller frequencies include the rotating shaft speed frequency (f_r) 322, the vane pass frequency (f_vane) 324, the shaft sideband frequencies (f_vane−f_r) 326 and (f_vane+f_r) 328, and background noise 330.

If high flow cavitations 302 or low flow cavitations 304 occur, the frequencies f_vane324, f_vane−f_r326 and f_vane+f_r328 decrease, and the background noise 330 increases. If impeller wear 306 occurs, the frequency f_vane324 increases, while the frequencies f_vane−f_r326 and f_vane+f_r328 decrease. Impeller cracking 310 results in an increase in each of the frequencies f_r322, f_vane−f_r326, and f_vane+f_r328, and the frequency f_vane324 decreases. An impeller vane breakage 312 increases the frequencies f_r322, f_vane−f_r326, and f_vane+f_r328 while causing a decrease in the frequency f_vane324. With these rules in mind, an impeller health monitoring system can monitor the health of one or more impellers and can identify a specific failure mode for each impeller (if any).

FIG. 4 illustrates an example Impeller Condition Indicator (ICI) device 400 according to this disclosure. The embodiment of the ICI device 400 shown in FIG. 4 is for illustration only. Other embodiments of the ICI device 400 could be used without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

In this example, the ICI device 400 includes a user configuration portion 402. The user configuration portion 402 provides a user interface that facilitates operator interaction with the ICI device 400. For example, the user configuration portion 402 may enable an operator to enter impeller configuration information. As particular examples, the user configuration portion 402 may allow the operator to enter a machine configuration 404. The machine configuration 404 may include a pump rating, one or more types of pumps, one or more types of impellers, and one or more natural frequencies of the machine.

The operator may also enter a filter specification 406. The filter specification 406 may include a filter type, an order of the filter, a higher frequency limit, and a lower frequency limit. Data Acquisition (DAQ) specifications 408 may further be entered by the operation in the user configuration portion 402. The DAQ specification 408 may include a sampling frequency, a number of samples, and a voltage range. In addition, the operator may enter sensor specifications 410 and additional user inputs 412. The sensor specifications 410 may include types of sensors, sensor ranges and sensitivities, and sensor dynamic ranges and natural frequencies. The additional user inputs 412 may include sampling frequency, a number of samples, and a class of machine.

The ICI device 400 also includes a sensor signal portion 420. The sensor signal portion 420 provides an interface for receiving inputs from sensors coupled to, or otherwise associated with, an impeller and/or a centrifugal pump or other device that includes an impeller. In this example, the sensor signal portion 420 includes interfaces to an accelerometer 422 and a tachometer 424. The accelerometer 422 detects, measures, and records a vibration 426 of an impeller or device containing the impeller. The tachometer 424 can be a sensor input device such as a tachogenerator or Once Per Revolution (OPR) device. The tachometer 424 detects, measures, and records speed 428 of an impeller or device containing the impeller. The sensor signal portion 420 also can store baseline signals 430 for the impeller or device containing the impeller.

The ICI device 400 further includes an Artificial Intelligence (AI) portion or other processing portion 440. In this example, the AI portion 440 includes an analog-to-digital converter 441, a pre-processing filter 442, and a vibration signature processor 444. The vibration signature processor 444 can include one or more processors or other components adapted to perform FFT analysis 446, Frequency/Frequency Bandwidth Selection (FFBS) 448, signal reconstruction 450, statistical features recordation 452, and normalization 454. The AI portion 440 is also able to perform Fuzzy Rule-Based Diagnostics 456 and Rule-Based Diagnostics 458. The Fuzzy Rule-Based Diagnostics 456 include Fuzzification, Rules, Aggregation and De-fuzzification operations. These functions are described in more detail below.

In addition, the ICI device 400 includes an output interface 470. The output interface 470 represents an interface configured to send information to another system or device, such as a computer or a display. The output interface 470 could also represent a single display (e.g., a monitor) or multiple displays. In this example, the output interface 470 includes an impeller wear indicator 472, an impeller crack indicator 474, a cavitations indicator 476, and an impeller health indicator 478. These indicators 472-478 identify the health of the impeller being monitored.

The ICI device 400 can be implemented in any suitable manner. For example, the ICI device 400 can be implemented as an Analog/Digital (A/D) card, an embedded system, a display system, a central processing unit, a personal computer, or a digital signal processor.

The ICI device 400 detects and measures the effects resulting from various types of impeller failures. For example, the ICI device 400 measures the changes in amplitudes of the frequencies 322-330 shown in FIG. 3. Based on those changes, the ICI device 400 classifies the impeller failure.

In one aspect of operation, an operator can enter a machine configuration 404 for an impeller or a device with an impeller via the user configuration portion 402. The operator can also enter a pump rating (if any), a type of pump (if any), a type of impeller, and one or more natural frequencies. The operator can further enter information relating to the filter specification 406, the DAQ specification 408, and the sensor specification 410. In addition, the operator can enter additional user inputs 412, such as a sampling frequency, a number of samples, and class of machine, that the ICI device 400 will use to monitor the impeller.

The ICI device 400 receives sensor input signals from sensors coupled to the ICI device 400 via a number of sensor interfaces. The ICI device 400 measures and records the sensor input signals associated with normal operation of the impeller. The ICI device 400 stores the sensor input signals corresponding to normal operation of the impeller as the set of baseline signals 430.

The ICI device 400 continues to monitor the performance of the impeller based on the sampling frequency included in the additional user inputs 412. The ICI device 400 filters the input signals from the sensors using the filter 442. The vibration signature processor 444 applies the FFT analysis 446 to all of the component characteristics (e.g., frequencies) in the filtered signals. The FFT analysis 446 may yield only the relevant frequencies related to the impeller being monitored.

The FFBS 448 isolates one or more frequencies and amplitudes that will be used in signal reconstruction 450 to reconstruct the signal. Once the signal is reconstructed using those selected frequencies and amplitudes, the vibration signature processor 444 determines statistical features 452 of the reconstructed signal. In some embodiments, the statistical feature 452 is a Root Mean Square (RMS) value. Thereafter, the vibration signature processor 444 produces a normalized signal by performing a normalization 454 of the reconstructed signal with respect to the baseline signal 430. The ICI device 400 can then apply various rules to the normalized signal. These rules may include Fuzzy Rule-Based Diagnostics 456 and/or Rule-Based Diagnostics 458.

The ICI device 400 presents an output of the results via the output interface 470. In some embodiments, the output interface 470 only provides an output when the ICI device 400 has determined that a fault condition exists (such as when the normalized signal differs from the baseline signals 430 by one or more threshold values). In these embodiments, the output interface 470 can provide the output by flagging, illuminating, or otherwise displaying the indicator associated with the failure (e.g., via the impeller wear indicator 472, the impeller crack indicator 474, the cavitations indicator 476, or the impeller health indicator 478).

FIG. 5 illustrates a more detailed view of an example ICI first stage operation 500 for monitoring the health of an impeller according to this disclosure. The embodiment of the ICI first stage operation 500 shown in FIG. 5 is for illustration only. Other embodiments of the ICI first stage operation 500 could be used without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

During a configuration stage, the operator enters data related to an impeller to be monitored, such as the filter specification 406, signal details (e.g., additional user inputs 412), the DAQ specification 408, the sensor specification 410, and the impeller specification (e.g., machine configuration 404). In this example, the operator can enter a type of impeller 502, a number of stages 504, a number of vanes 505 for each stage, a high-pass filter frequency F_H506, a maximum sampling frequency f_daq507 and a maximum number of samples N_daq508 for data acquisition, a maximum sampling frequency f_daq510 for each sensor, and a sampling frequency f_s511 and a number of samples N_s512.

The ICI device 400 also determines a Family of Frequencies (FoF) 520 for the impeller (or for each stage of the impeller if multiple stages are monitored). For example, the AI portion 440 can determine the vane pass frequency f_vane324 and at least three harmonics for each vane pass frequency f_vane324. The AI portion 440 can also determine the shaft frequency f_r322 and shaft sidebands f_vane−f_r326 and f_vane+f_r328 around the vane pass frequency f_vane324. It will be understood that although three harmonics for each vane pass frequency f_vane324 are illustrated, embodiments with other than three harmonics could be used. In addition, the AI portion 440 can determine a natural frequency for the impeller.

The AI portion 440 also determines if the operator has entered appropriate values for F_H506, f_s511, and N_s512. For example, the AI portion 440 compares f_s511 to F_H506 during a comparison 530. If f_s511 is less than twice F_H506 (f_s<2F_H), the AI portion 440 triggers an increase f_s511 indicator 532 in the output interface 470 of the ICI device 400. The increase f_sindicator 532 provides a visual or audible cue to the operator that the value entered for f_s511 is too low and should be increased.

If the AI portion 440 determines that a sufficient f_s511 has been entered (e.g., f_s511 is not less than twice F_H506 such that f_s≧2 F_H), the AI portion 440 compares f_s511 to f_daq507 during a comparison 536. If f_s511 is greater than to f_daq507 (f_s>f_daq), the AI portion 440 triggers a decrease f_sindicator 534 in the output interface 470. The decrease f_sindicator 534 provides a visual or audible cue to the operator that the value entered for f_s511 is too high and should be decreased.

The AI portion 440 also compares N_s512 against N_daq508 during a comparison 540. If N_s512 is greater than N_daq508 (N_s>N_daq), the AI portion 440 triggers an decrease N_sindicator 542 in the output interface 470. The decrease N_sindicator 542 provides a visual or audible cue to the operator that the value entered for N_s512 is too high and should be increased. If N_s512 is less than or equal to N_daq508 (N_s≦N_daq), the AI portion 440 either disables the decrease N_sindicator 542 (if the decrease N_sindicator 542 is enabled) or does nothing (if the decrease N_sindicator 542 is not enabled).

FIG. 6 illustrates a more detailed view of an example ICI second stage operation 600 for monitoring the health of an impeller according to this disclosure. The embodiment of the ICI second stage operation 600 shown in FIG. 6 is for illustration only. Other embodiments of the ICI second stage operation 600 could be used without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

After the AI portion 440 has computed the Family of Frequencies 520 for the sensor input signals, the AI portion 440 processes the FoF 520 through the low-pass filter 442 and applies the FFT analysis 446. The low-pass filter 442 can be a Butterworth filter, a wavelet-based filter, or any other low pass filter. The FoF 520 is passed through the FFBS 448, which, in this example, includes a number of band-pass filters paths 605a-605c. A 2 Hz band (e.g., from f+1 Hz to f−1 Hz) 605a is applied to the signals from the FFT analysis 446 whose value is less than 1000 Hz (f<1000 Hz). A 3 Hz band (e.g., from f+1.5 Hz to f−1.5 Hz) 605b is applied to the signals from the FFT analysis 446 whose value is less than 2000 Hz but greater than or equal to 1000 Hz (1000 Hz≦f<2000 Hz). A 4 Hz band (e.g., from f+2 Hz to f−2 Hz) 605c is applied to the signals from the FFT analysis 446 whose value is greater than or equal to 2000 Hz (f≧2000 Hz).

The AI portion 440 computes the minimum and maximum amplitudes for each band 605a-605c. The AI portion 440 then combines each of the maximums from the bands 605a-605c to generate a matrix of maximum amplitudes and frequencies 610. The AI portion 440 also combines each of the minimums from the bands 605a-605c to generate a matrix of minimum amplitudes and frequencies 615. The AI portion 440 creates a union 620 of all frequencies in the FoF 520 to identify the impeller component frequencies.

The AI portion 440 applies statistical features 452 to the union 620 and the matrix of min amplitudes and frequencies 615. The statistical features 452 can include determining the RMS or norm of each FoF 520. Thereafter, the AI portion 440 performs signal reconstruction 450 for the impeller component and noise frequencies to generate reconstructed signals for the impeller. In this example, the reconstructed signals represent an acceleration. In particular, the AI portion 440 can reconstruct a signal for the vane and harmonics, a signal for the shaft and shaft sideband frequencies, and a signal for noise frequencies.

Each of the reconstructed signals is passed through an RMS level detector 630, a normalized RMS level detector 635, and one of three fuzzy membership functions 640. The outputs of the fuzzy membership functions 640 are passed through fuzzy rules 645 to produce a fuzzy rule signal. The AI portion 440 compares the fuzzy rule signal to a number of indexes within an RMS or norm baseline signal 650 to produce one or more impeller or pump conditions 655. Note that the fuzzy membership functions 640 and fuzzy rules 645 could be replaced by other logic, such as when the rule-based diagnostics 458 are used.

The impeller or pump conditions 655 provide an indication that reflects the health of an impeller or pump based on, in this example, a sensed vibration. The ICI device 400 can output an impeller or pump condition that identifies impeller wear, impeller crack, and/or cavitations using the output interface 470.

In some embodiments, the ICI device 400 includes a number of threshold values stored in a memory, and the ICI device 400 can compare the identified conditions 655 to the threshold values stored in memory to determine whether to initiate an alarm or other action. The memory can be any computer readable medium, such as any electronic, magnetic, electromagnetic, optical, electro-optical, electromechanical, and/or other memory device that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transmit data. In particular embodiments, the threshold values could include a warning threshold and an alarm threshold for each condition 655 calculated by the ICI device 400. The warning threshold could trigger a warning that an impeller condition 655 is high, while an alarm threshold could trigger an alarm that a fault has been detected in an impeller.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example process 700 for monitoring an impeller according to this disclosure. The embodiment of the process 700 shown in FIG. 7 is for illustration only. Other embodiments of the process 700 could be used without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Also, for ease of explanation, the process 700 is described with respect to the ICI device 400, although the process 700 could be used with any suitable device or system.

In this example, the ICI device 400 uses vibration and speed signals, as processed and compared to the thresholds, to alert an operator to possible damage in an impeller. The vibration and speed signals are received by the ICI device 400 at step 705. The ICI device 400 stores the vibration and speed signals obtained during normal operation of the impeller as baseline signals at step 710. The ICI device 400 determines the relevant family of frequencies for the impeller at step 715. This may include, for example, determining the FoF 520 for each of the failure modes of the impeller. The FoF 520 can include a vane pass frequency and its harmonics, a shaft rotating frequency, sidebands of the shaft rotating frequencies around the vane pass frequency and its harmonics, and background noise. The ICI device 400 can measure the vibration signals and estimate the frequencies of the vibration signals using any available technique, such as FFT analysis.

The ICI device 400 continues to receive vibration and speed signals and performs signal processing at step 720. This may include, for example, decomposing the vibration and speed signals. The signal processing may also include a low-pass filter operation and an FFT analysis. In some embodiments, deconstruction (e.g., decomposition) is accomplished using a Fourier series, a Laplace transform, or a Z-transform. The ICI device 400 performs frequency/frequency bandwidth selection using the processed signals at step 725. This may include, for example, isolating frequencies and obtaining minimum and maximum frequencies and amplitudes. The ICI device 400 reconstructs the signal at step 730, such as by reconstructing an overall signal and reconstructing signals for the vane pass frequencies and its harmonics, the shaft sidebands, and the background noise. The ICI device 400 identifies one or more features from the reconstructed signal in step 735. For example, the ICI device 400 can determine features such as RMS and Kurtosis values. The ICI device 400 also identifies corresponding features in the base line signal in step 740 and the current signal in step 745. The reconstructed signals are normalized with respect to the features of the baseline signals or other indices at step 750. For example, the reconstructed signals can be normalized by dividing the features from the current signal, found in step 745, by the features from the baseline, found in step 750. The normalizing helps to generalize the model with respect to the size of a mechanical system and application type. In the event a reconstructed signal exceeds one of the thresholds, the ICI device 400 outputs the appropriate indicator (e.g., the impeller wear indicator, impeller crack indicator, and/or cavitations indicator) in step 755. The ICI device 400 applies fuzzy-rule based diagnostics to determine if the reconstructed signal exceeds one of the thresholds.

In some embodiments, the vibration and speed signals stored are for an impeller that currently is experiencing wear or currently includes a crack. In such embodiments, the ICI device 400 provides a warning or alarm based on a change in the signals resulting from additional wearing or further cracking of the impeller.

FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate example impeller health indicators 478 according to this disclosure. The embodiments of the impeller health indicators 478 shown in FIGS. 8 and 9 are for illustration only. Other embodiments of the impeller health indicator 478 could be used without departing from the scope of this disclosure.

In these examples, the impeller health indicator 478 is constructed using a feature fusion of statistics on the basis of Fuzzy, Dempter-Shafer, or Bayesian theory. The health indicator 478 provides a severity index varying between a value of 0 and a value of 1. The impeller health indicator 478 includes a time 805 and two threshold values 810 and 815.

Although the figures above have illustrated various embodiments, any number of modifications could be made to these figures. For example, any suitable types of impellers could be monitored, and any suitable types of faults could be detected. Also, various functions shown as being performed by the ICI device 400 could be combined, further subdivided, or omitted and additional functions could be added according to particular needs. In addition, while FIG. 7 illustrates a series of steps, various steps in FIG. 7 could overlap, occur in parallel, occur multiple times, or occur in a different order.

In some embodiments, various functions described above are implemented or supported by a computer program that is formed from computer readable program code and that is embodied in a computer readable medium. The phrase “computer readable program code” includes any type of computer code, including source code, object code, and executable code. The phrase “computer readable medium” includes any type of medium capable of being accessed by a computer, such as read only memory (ROM), random access memory (RAM), a hard disk drive, a compact disc (CD), a digital video disc (DVD), or any other type of memory.

It may be advantageous to set forth definitions of certain words and phrases used throughout this patent document. The term “couple” and its derivatives refer to any direct or indirect communication between two or more elements, whether or not those elements are in physical contact with one another. The terms “include” and “comprise,” as well as derivatives thereof, mean inclusion without limitation. The term “or” is inclusive, meaning and/or. The phrases “associated with” and “associated therewith,” as well as derivatives thereof, may mean to include, be included within, interconnect with, contain, be contained within, connect to or with, couple to or with, be communicable with, cooperate with, interleave, juxtapose, be proximate to, be bound to or with, have, have a property of, or the like.

While this disclosure has described certain embodiments and generally associated methods, alterations and permutations of these embodiments and methods will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the above description of example embodiments does not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure, as defined by the following claims.

INVENTORS:

Kar, Chinmaya

THIS PATENT IS REFERENCED BY THESE PATENTS:

Patent	Priority	Assignee	Title
11321586,	Sep 25 2019	Honeywell International Inc.	Method, apparatus, and computer program product for determining burner operating state

THIS PATENT REFERENCES THESE PATENTS:

Patent	Priority	Assignee	Title
2799015,
2883255,
3242321,
4286515,	Nov 24 1978	Apura GmbH & Co.	Compacting waste basket
4621177,	Mar 27 1985	Beloit Technologies, Inc	Inductor configuration for eddy current heating in the papermaking process
4675487,	Oct 03 1983	Valmet Oy	Apparatus and method for electromagnetic heating of a roll
4704191,	Jan 08 1985	Beloit Technologies, Inc	Electromagnetic extended nip press
4885707,	Feb 19 1987	DLI Corporation	Vibration data collecting and processing apparatus and method
5262958,	Apr 05 1991	Texas Instruments Incorporated	Spline-wavelet signal analyzers and methods for processing signals
5381697,	Jul 06 1992	Krohne Messtechnik GmbH & Co., KG	Mass flow meter
5479824,	Dec 21 1993	General Electric Company	On-line shaft crack detector
5519337,	Nov 04 1993	Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.	Motor monitoring method and apparatus using high frequency current components
5594180,	Aug 12 1994	Micro Motion, Inc.; Micro Motion, Inc	Method and apparatus for fault detection and correction in Coriolis effect mass flowmeters
5616824,	Aug 21 1995	General Electric Company	Instrument for detecting potential future failures of valves in critical control systems
5641891,	Sep 20 1994	Sonplas GmbH	Method for setting and checking the flow in valves
5646600,	Jan 12 1995	General Electric Company	Instrument for detecting potential future failures of valves in critical control systems
5750879,	May 31 1996	Yamatake-Honeywell Co., Ltd.	Stick-slip detection method and apparatus
5939625,	Jun 13 1996	Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha	Fault diagnosis method and apparatus for control system
5963884,	Sep 23 1996	Machinexpert, LLC	Predictive maintenance system
5966674,	Apr 09 1997	Westinghouse Air Brake Company	Flow signal filter
6208943,	Jul 24 1996	AMERICAN SIGMA, INC , A CORP OF NEW YORK	Fluid flow measurement correcting system and methods of constructing and utilizing same
6330525,	Dec 31 1997	Innovation Management Group, Inc.	Method and apparatus for diagnosing a pump system
6349637,	Feb 09 1999	SGM, S.p.A.	Calender with magnetic device for adjusting the contact pressure between the rolls
6408676,	Mar 31 1999	Caterpillar Inc.; Caterpillar Inc	Method and apparatus for determining the status of a relief valve
6484109,	May 20 1998	AZIMA HOLDINGS, INC	Diagnostic vibration data collector and analyzer
6505517,	Jul 23 1999	Micro Motion, Inc	High accuracy signal processing for magnetic flowmeter
6539315,	Jun 29 1999	FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY	Regulator flow measurement apparatus
6634000,	Feb 01 2000	General Electric Company	Analyzing fault logs and continuous data for diagnostics for a locomotive
6654697,	Mar 28 1996	Rosemount Inc.	Flow measurement with diagnostics
6657529,	Jul 23 1999	Koninklijke Philips Electronics N V	Magnetic component
6681634,	Dec 11 2001	ITT Manufacturing Enterprises, Inc.	Bearing defect detection using time synchronous averaging (TSA) of an enveloped accelerometer signal
6691249,	Mar 22 2000	Agilent Technologies, Inc	Probabilistic diagnosis, in particular for embedded and remote applications
6708291,	May 20 2000	Ciena Corporation	Hierarchical fault descriptors in computer systems
6725167,	Jan 16 2002	FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY	Flow measurement module and method
6727725,	May 01 2001	Square D Company	Motor bearing damage detection via wavelet analysis of the starting current transient
6757668,	Nov 05 1999	General Electric Company	Information fusion of classifiers in systems with partial redundant information
6845340,	Mar 06 2003	Ford Motor Company	System and method for machining data management
6900420,	Dec 27 2000	Metso Automation Oy; EFD INDUCTION A S	Cooled induction heating coil
6933693,	Nov 08 2002	EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LIMITED	Method and apparatus of detecting disturbances in a centrifugal pump
6941785,	May 13 2003	UT-Battelle, LLC	Electric fuel pump condition monitor system using electrical signature analysis
7257501,	Nov 17 2005	Honeywell International Inc.; Honeywell International Inc	Apparatus and method for identifying informative data in a process control environment
7274995,	Nov 19 2003	HONEYWELL INTERNATIONL INC	Apparatus and method for identifying possible defect indicators for a valve
7286945,	Nov 19 2003	HOWEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC	Apparatus and method for identifying possible defect indicators for a valve
7421374,	Nov 17 2005	Honeywell International Inc.; Honeywell International Inc	Apparatus and method for analyzing model quality in a process control environment
7509234,	Aug 16 2007	GM Global Technology Operations LLC	Root cause diagnostics using temporal data mining
7640139,	Oct 18 2004	NSK Ltd	Abnormality diagnosing system for mechanical equipment
7640802,	Apr 11 2003	Rolls-Royce plc	Method and system for analysing tachometer and vibration data from an apparatus having one or more rotary components
20020020144,
20020152052,
20030019297,
20030216888,
20040024568,
20040159112,
20040199828,
20050104020,
20060025970,
20060071666,
20070088534,
20080033695,
20090049338,
20100030492,
20100145639,
EP1097363,
JP2005147081,
JP407190849,
JP62226033,
JP743278,
KR20030048779,
KR20050011919,
WO4361,
WO3090091,

ASSIGNMENT RECORDS Assignment records on the USPTO

Executed on	Assignor	Assignee	Conveyance	Frame	Reel	Doc
Apr 02 2009		Honeywell International Inc.	(assignment on the face of the patent)
Apr 02 2009	KAR, CHINMAYA	Honeywell International Inc	ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS	022498	0181	pdf

MAINTENANCE FEES AND DATES: Maintenance records on the USPTO

Date	Maintenance Fee Events
May 25 2017	M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity.
Jun 22 2021	M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity.

Date	Maintenance Schedule
Dec 31 2016	4 years fee payment window open
Jul 01 2017	6 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 31 2017	patent expiry (for year 4)
Dec 31 2019	2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Dec 31 2020	8 years fee payment window open
Jul 01 2021	6 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 31 2021	patent expiry (for year 8)
Dec 31 2023	2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Dec 31 2024	12 years fee payment window open
Jul 01 2025	6 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Dec 31 2025	patent expiry (for year 12)
Dec 31 2027	2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)