A detector circuit for detecting the presence of a remote capacitive sensor having at least two terminals connected via a protection circuit that includes one or more capacitors, the detector circuit comprising: a current supply for changing the charge on the sensor and the protection circuit, a detector for measuring the voltage on one or more of the terminals; wherein the presence of the sensor is determined by changing the charge on the capacitive sensor and the one or more capacitors of the protection circuit in a predetermined manner such that the voltage measurement on the one or more terminals when the sensor is present is significantly different than when the sensor is absent.
|
14. A method for detecting a presence of a remote capacitive sensor having two terminals connected via a protection circuit that includes one or more capacitors, the method comprising:
forcing, during a first time period, first and second terminals of bias circuitry to ground, wherein each of the first and second terminals is configured to be connected to a respective one of the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor, wherein the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor are both isolated from being connected directly to ground;
discharging the bias circuitry in response forcing to the first and second terminals to the ground;
disconnecting, during a second time period, both of the first and second terminals from being coupled to the ground;
providing, during the second time period, a voltage from a voltage source to the first terminal;
sourcing, during the second time period, a current from a detector through the bias circuitry and the remote capacitive sensor;
measuring, during a second time period, a voltage variation between the first and second terminals of the bias circuitry based on the voltage provided to the first terminal; and
determining whether the remote capacitive is present based on the voltage variation between the first and second terminals;
wherein the voltage variation being larger than a threshold voltage is indicative of the remote capacitive sensor being present.
20. A method comprising:
during a first time period:
closing a first switch to couple a first terminal of bias circuitry to ground;
closing a second switch to couple a second terminal of the bias circuitry to the ground; and
discharging the bias circuitry in response to closing the first and second switches, wherein each of the first and second terminals is configured to be connected to a respective one of the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor, wherein the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor are both isolated from being connected directly to ground; and
during a second time period:
opening the first switch to disconnect the first terminal of the bias circuitry from being coupled to ground;
opening the second switch to disconnect the second terminal of the bias circuitry from being coupled to the ground;
providing a voltage to the first terminal of the bias circuitry;
sourcing a current from a detector through the bias circuitry and the remote capacitive sensor;
measuring a voltage variation between the first and second terminal of the bias circuitry based on the voltage provided to the first terminal of the bias circuitry; and
determining whether the remote capacitive sensor is present based on the voltage variation between the first and second terminals of the bias circuitry, wherein the voltage variation being larger than a threshold voltage is indicative of the remote capacitive sensor being present.
1. A detector circuit for detecting a presence of a remote capacitive sensor having two terminals connected via a protection circuit that includes one or more capacitors to the detector circuit, the detector circuit comprising;
a voltage supply to provide a first voltage to the remote capacitive sensor, when present, and the protection circuit;
bias circuitry coupled to the voltage supply, the bias circuitry having first and second terminals each configured to be connected to a respective one of the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor, wherein the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor are both isolated from being connected directly to ground, the bias circuitry to couple the first and second terminals to the ground to discharge the bias circuitry during a first time period, and to disconnect the first and second terminals from being coupled to the ground and provide the first voltage from the voltage supply to the first terminal during a second time period; and
a detector having a first input terminal coupled to the first terminal of the bias circuitry, and a second input terminal coupled to the second terminal of the bias circuitry, the detector to measure a voltage variation between the first and second terminals of the bias circuitry during the second time period, and to determine whether the remote capacitive sensor is present based on the voltage variation;
wherein the first voltage causes a current to be sourced from the detector through the bias circuitry and the remote capacitive sensor; and
wherein the voltage variation being larger than a threshold voltage is indicative of the remote capacitive sensor being present.
2. A detector circuit according to
3. A detector circuit according to
4. A detector circuit according to
5. A detector circuit according to
6. A detector circuit according to
7. A detector circuit according to
8. A detector circuit according to
9. A detector circuit according to
10. A detector circuit according to
one or more switches to change a state of the detector circuit such that the remote capacitive sensor, when present, and interface components can be charged or discharged.
11. A detector circuit according to
12. A detector circuit according to
15. The method
sourcing of current into the sensor by pulling one of the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor, when present, to a predetermined voltage.
16. The method
17. The method
switching a load on one or both of the two terminals of the remote capacitive sensor to an impedance level having a predetermined value to allow the detection of the voltage variation.
18. The method
19. The method
changing, via one or more switches, a state of the detector circuit such that the remote capacitive sensor, when present, and interface components can be charged or discharged.
|
This invention relates to improvements in or relating to diagnostics of a capacitive sensor, for example a knock sensor in an engine control system.
Abnormal combustion, more commonly known as knock, is a limiting factor on power generation in an internal combustion engine. The name knock refers to the noise that is transmitted from the collision of multiple flame fronts and the increased cylinder pressure that causes the pistons, connecting rods and bearings to resonate. A knock sensor detects engine knock and sends the voltage signal to an engine control unit (ECU). The ECU uses the knock sensor signal to control timing of the engine. Engine knock generally occurs within a specific frequency range and the knock sensor is located on the engine block, cylinder head or intake manifold and is able to detect that frequency range.
Detecting the presence of a capacitive sensor, such as the knock sensor, at the end of a capacitive cable, through an engine control unit (ECU) that is protected by an electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) capacitor is a long existing problem. This is because the knock sensor has high impedance and does not generate a very strong output signal, which means that the sensitivity of the ECU is critical. In addition, due to legislation relating to emission controls in engines there is a legal requirement to know if the knock sensor is working or not. Knock is a relatively quiet noise which can be easily confused with other engine noises and the determination of whether the knock sensor is working or not is made particularly difficult by this. Another problem that exists is that the capacitance of the knock sensor is relatively low and is often hard to measure due to the values of the EMC capacitor and the capacitance in the cabling.
A number of different methods have been proposed to overcome the problem of detecting the presence of the capacitive sensor. One relates to diagnostics using threshold detection as is described in for example EP 0720007 (Bosch). In this method the normal output of the sensor is characterised with respect to engine speed, and output higher or lower than expected is taken to indicate a fault with the knock sensor. The issue with this is that the point of the knock detection system is to minimise knock, which therefore means the normal condition is nascent or no knock and hence low output from the sensor. Since the ECU input is high impedance it tends to be subject to significant pickup of electrical noise. Thus low noise from a connector sensor and electrical pickup by the wires when the sensor is disconnected can be indistinguishable.
A second method of overcoming the problem that has been disclosed is a diagnostic using self resonance as is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,421,191 a (Chrysler). In this method the sensor is excited with pulses matching the sensor's predetermined resonance and the amplitude of these is measured after excitation is removed. This method requires knowledge of the resonant frequency of the sensor, wiring and load combination as installed, which can vary considerably. If the driving frequency is wrong then no resonance will be induced.
A third method of overcoming the problem that has been disclosed is a diagnostic using capacitor oscillation, as is described in EP 0704706 (Marelli). In this scheme the sensor is used as part of the oscillator. If the sensor is connected then a particular frequency should be presumed. This scheme suffers from tolerance issues. The sensor is around 800 pF and the connector connecting it might be 1 m to 5 m of coaxial cable at 300 pF/m. The EMC protection capacitors are typically between 470 pF and 1000 pF. As these capacitor are usually low tolerance it becomes difficult to identify whether the sensor itself is connected due to the greater amount of low tolerance capacitance in the connection to the sensor.
One object of the present invention is to overcome at least some of the problems associated with the prior art. In addition, a further object is to provide a diagnostic of capacitive sensing by charge sharing.
The present invention provides a method and an apparatus as described in the accompanying claims.
In order to overcome the problems of the prior art the sensor diagnostics components make use of the same components used for bias. This has the added advantage of minimising the overall number of external components required. This is achieved by sourcing current from the Analogue to Digital Converter (ADC) pin through the network of external components, including the knock sensor. The ratio of connected capacitances results in a ratio of voltages that can be read using the ADC. Connection of the knock sensor is indicated by presence of its capacitance. The manner in which this can be measured is accurate and consistent. The problems associated with the prior art relating to the ability to “see” the knock sensor are overcome by not looking at absolute values but instead looking at relative values.
Reference will now be made, by way of example to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Referring now to
In the circuit shown the sensor bias circuitry is designed to bias the ADC 106 at the voltage between 5V and 0V depending on the values of the resistances. In this case because the resistances are all equal the bias voltage on the ADC is 2.5V. This has an advantage in that the ADC does not need to operate at negative voltages and can thus be less complex than would otherwise be the case. The ADC in this case is a differential ADC which enables output measurements from either output pin or a differential measurement from both output pins. The ADC could be replaced by a differential amplifier and an analogue detection circuit if required. This circuit also includes a number of N and P MOSFETs (not shown) which are used in the knock sensor diagnostics and will be described in greater detail below.
In order to determine whether the knock sensor is connected or operating the circuit is first placed in a discharged state. This will be described now with reference to
It will be appreciated that the sensor biasing circuitry is included in
After having been discharged the diagnosis circuit, the circuit is then pulled up to maximum voltage (5V) on one side. In the diagram this is shown on the ANP side of the circuit but could equally well be on the ANM side of the circuit. Similarly it would be possible to pull up one side of the circuit and then the other in a sequential manner. The ANP side is pulled up by connecting a MOSFET 116 to the 5V supply. This places the circuit in a charge share state and due to the symmetry of the circuit the output pin of the ADC can be read out to determine whether the knock sensor is connected and/or operating.
In this state R1, R2, and C2 have no effect. R1 and R2 cancel out due to the fact that once the circuit is charged up there is no current flowing. As C2 has one side connected to ground and one side connected to 5V the capacitance is irrelevant to the voltage on ANM.
The voltage on C3 is charge shared through the knock sensor and the cable. In terms of capacitance, the capacitance of the knock sensor, cable and capacitor C4 are in parallel with each other. These three capacitances are on the high side of capacitor C3. The values of capacitance for the knock sensor, cable and C4 are substantially similar to the capacitance of C3. This means that once this circuit is stable the voltage on pin ANM of the ADC is going to be approximately 2.5V. The value of capacitance of the knock sensor is significantly greater than that of the cable and C4. Thus, if the knock sensor is not there or faulty there will be a difference between the capacitance of the knock sensor, cable and C4 and that of C3. The effect of this is a larger voltage on C4 than on C3, which means a difference output on pin ANM at the ADC. To make the readings of the circuit in this charge shared state the input to the ADC is preferably measured in single ended mode, although differential mode may also be used.
This invention has a significant advantage over the prior art, in that it provides a definitive means of determining whether the knock sensor is connected or not. The difference in voltage on the output pin of the ADC is easily measurable as can be seen in
As has been previously mentioned the knock sensor diagnostics circuit includes a number of MOSFETs which are required at various stages in the process. To provide a high degree of adjustability a pin pull resistor configuration as is shown in
It will be appreciated that the example shown is merely an example and many variations of the circuit may exist which fall within the scope of this invention. For example, different values of capacitance, resistance or circuit design can be used. It is a common feature of them all that the resulting voltage on the ECU pins is substantially and measurably different when the knock sensor is there than when it is not.
Pietri, Stefano, Marshall, Ray, Garrard, Mike
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10006829, | Mar 24 2015 | Azbil Corporation | Sediment state estimating apparatus, sediment state estimating method, and sediment state estimating system |
9791494, | Jan 20 2012 | Lear Corporation | Apparatus and method for diagnostics of a capacitive sensor |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3286164, | |||
5377524, | Jun 22 1992 | REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, THE | Self-testing capacitive pressure transducer and method |
5421191, | Mar 08 1993 | NEW CARCO ACQUISITION LLC; Chrysler Group LLC | Knock sensor diagnostic system |
6466036, | Nov 25 1998 | NEODRÓN LIMITED | Charge transfer capacitance measurement circuit |
6727812, | Jul 11 2000 | Robert Bosch GmbH | Method and device for error detection and diagnosis in a knock sensor |
20050231212, | |||
20070035312, | |||
20070068266, | |||
20070075710, | |||
EP615119, | |||
EP704706, | |||
EP720007, | |||
JP58011824, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Apr 06 2007 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Apr 12 2007 | MARSHALL, RAY | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023313 | /0062 | |
Apr 14 2007 | PIETRI, STEFANO | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023313 | /0062 | |
Apr 26 2007 | GARRARD, MIKE | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023313 | /0062 | |
Feb 12 2010 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | CITIBANK, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024079 | /0082 | |
Feb 19 2010 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | CITIBANK, N A | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024085 | /0001 | |
Apr 13 2010 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 024397 | /0001 | |
May 21 2013 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | CITIBANK, N A , AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 030633 | /0424 | |
Nov 01 2013 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | CITIBANK, N A , AS NOTES COLLATERAL AGENT | SECURITY AGREEMENT | 031591 | /0266 | |
Dec 07 2015 | CITIBANK, N A , AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | PATENT RELEASE | 037355 | /0723 | |
Dec 07 2015 | CITIBANK, N A | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE PATENTS 8108266 AND 8062324 AND REPLACE THEM WITH 6108266 AND 8060324 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037518 FRAME 0292 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 041703 | /0536 | |
Dec 07 2015 | CITIBANK, N A | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 037486 | /0517 | |
Dec 07 2015 | CITIBANK, N A | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037486 FRAME 0517 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 053547 | /0421 | |
Dec 07 2015 | CITIBANK, N A | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 037486 FRAME 0517 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 053547 | /0421 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042985 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0387 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042762 FRAME 0145 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051145 | /0184 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 038017 | /0058 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12092129 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 039361 | /0212 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12681366 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 042762 | /0145 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042762 FRAME 0145 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051145 | /0184 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12681366 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 042985 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042985 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0001 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051029 | /0387 | |
Feb 18 2016 | NXP B V | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT | 051030 | /0001 | |
May 25 2016 | Freescale Semiconductor, Inc | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | SUPPLEMENT TO THE SECURITY AGREEMENT | 039138 | /0001 | |
Jun 22 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP B V | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040928 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST | 052915 | /0001 | |
Jun 22 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP B V | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040928 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST | 052915 | /0001 | |
Jun 22 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP B V | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040928 | /0001 | |
Sep 12 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP, B V F K A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040925 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST | 052917 | /0001 | |
Sep 12 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP, B V , F K A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040925 | /0001 | |
Sep 12 2016 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP, B V F K A FREESCALE SEMICONDUCTOR, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 11759915 AND REPLACE IT WITH APPLICATION 11759935 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 040925 FRAME 0001 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST | 052917 | /0001 | |
Nov 07 2016 | Freescale Semiconductor Inc | NXP USA, INC | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE LISTED CHANGE OF NAME SHOULD BE MERGER AND CHANGE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 040652 FRAME: 0180 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE MERGER AND CHANGE OF NAME | 041354 | /0148 | |
Nov 07 2016 | Freescale Semiconductor Inc | NXP USA, INC | CHANGE OF NAME SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 040652 | /0180 | |
Feb 17 2019 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NO FROM 13,883,290 TO 13,833,290 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 041703 FRAME 0536 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 048734 | /0001 | |
Feb 17 2019 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | SHENZHEN XINGUODU TECHNOLOGY CO , LTD | CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NO FROM 13,883,290 TO 13,833,290 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 041703 FRAME 0536 ASSIGNOR S HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS | 048734 | /0001 | |
Sep 03 2019 | MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC | NXP B V | RELEASE BY SECURED PARTY SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 050744 | /0097 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Jul 30 2014 | ASPN: Payor Number Assigned. |
Jun 21 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Jun 16 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Jan 14 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Jul 14 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 14 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Jan 14 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Jan 14 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Jul 14 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 14 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Jan 14 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Jan 14 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Jul 14 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Jan 14 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Jan 14 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |