A linear motor activator for a downhole safety valve including a permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier; a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; and a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to a component of a downhole safety valve and method.
|
3. A method for reducing force requirements of an actuator in a downhole environment comprising:
sealing a force transmitter within a housing to isolate ends of the force transmitter from tubing pressure during use;
initiating an activator having:
a permanent magnet carrier;
a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier;
a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier;
a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to the force transmitter; and
urging the force transmitter in a direction commensurate with activating a downhole tool, the actuator generating enough force to activate the downhole tool other than to overcome tubing pressure.
1. A tubing pressure insensitive actuator system comprising:
a housing having a bore therein;
a force transmitter sealingly moveable within the bore the force transmitter defining with the bore two fluid chambers, one at each longitudinal end of the force transmitter;
at least two seals sealingly positioned between the housing and the force transmitter, one of the seals isolating one end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure and another of the seals isolating another end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure;
an activator having:
a permanent magnet carrier;
a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier;
a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; and
a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to the force transmitter.
2. A tubing pressure insensitive actuator system for an electric surface controlled subsurface safety valve comprising:
a subsurface safety valve housing supporting a flow tube, a flapper and a power spring, the housing having a force transmitter bore therein;
a force transmitter sealingly moveable within the force transmitter bore, the force transmitter defining with the bore two fluid chambers, one at each longitudinal end of the force transmitter, at least one of the chambers containing an electric activator in operable communication with the force transmitter;
an interengagement at the force transmitter, force transmissively engaged with the flow tube, the interengagement exposed to tubing pressure during use;
at least two seals sealingly positioned between the housing and the force transmitter, one of the seals isolating one end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure and another of the seals isolating another end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure;
an activator having:
a permanent magnet carrier;
a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier;
a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; and
a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to the force transmitter.
|
Surface Controlled Subsurface Safety Valves (SCSSV) are a common part of most wellbores in the hydrocarbon industry. Subsurface safety valves are generally located below the surface and allow production from a well while being closable at a moments notice should an imbalance in the operation of the well be detected either at the surface or at another location. In most constructions, SCSSVs are actively openable and passively closable ensuring that failures of the actuating system allow the valve to “fail safe” or in other words, fail in a closed position. Traditional subsurface safety valves have been hydraulically actuated. As operators move into deeper water, the use of hydraulics as the means of actuating subsurface safety valves becomes technically challenging as well as expensive. The technical limitations of hydraulics, the costs and reliability restrictions associated with hydraulics, and environmental issues are all work synergistically to increase costs of production, which necessarily results in lower profitability or increased pricing of the produced fluids. In view of these drawbacks, the art will well receive alternate SCSSV actuation systems that alleviate the same.
A linear motor activator for a downhole safety valve including a permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier; a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; and a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to a component of a downhole safety valve.
A downhole safety valve including a permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier; a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to a component of a downhole safety valve; and a controller configured to sequentially power phases of coils to cause the permanent magnet carrier to actuate the safety valve.
A tubing pressure insensitive actuator system including a housing having a bore therein; a force transmitter sealingly moveable within the bore the force transmitter defining with the bore two fluid chambers, one at each longitudinal end of the force transmitter; at least two seals sealingly positioned between the housing and the force transmitter, one of the seals isolating one end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure and another of the seals isolating another end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure; an activator having: a permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier; a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; and a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to the force transmitter.
A tubing pressure insensitive actuator system for an electric surface controlled subsurface safety valve including a subsurface safety valve housing supporting a flow tube, a flapper and a power spring, the housing having a force transmitter bore therein; a force transmitter sealingly moveable within the force transmitter bore, the force transmitter defining with the bore two fluid chambers, one at each longitudinal end of the force transmitter, at least one of the chambers containing an electric activator in operable communication with the force transmitter; an interengagement at the force transmitter, force transmissively engaged with the flow tube, the interengagement exposed to tubing pressure during use; at least two seals sealingly positioned between the housing and the force transmitter, one of the seals isolating one end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure and another of the seals isolating another end of the force transmitter from tubing pressure; an activator having: a permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier; a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; and a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to the force transmitter.
A method for reducing force requirements of an actuator in a downhole environment including sealing a force transmitter within a housing to isolate ends of the force transmitter from tubing pressure during use; initiating an activator having: a permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of permanent magnets mounted to the permanent magnet carrier; a coil carrier disposed in magnetic field proximity to the permanent magnet carrier; a plurality of coils mounted to the coil carrier, one of the permanent magnet carrier and the coil carrier being movable relative to the other of the permanent magnet carrier and coil carrier, and being connected to the force transmitter; and urging the force transmitter in a direction commensurate with activating a downhole tool, the actuator generating enough force to activate the downhole tool other than to overcome tubing pressure.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like elements are numbered alike in the several Figures:
Among the challenges in developing an actuator system for, for example, an electric safety valve, or other tool intended to operate in an unfriendly environment such as a downhole environment, are isolation of an activator of the actuator from wellbore fluids during use and issues relating to force generation density. In order to avoid confusion in reading the instant disclosure, the term “actuator” is used to refer to the system level while the “activator” is used to refer to a prime mover level. With regard to the latter, isolation of the activator mechanism from the environmental factors that are problematic for the activator, is desirable. Many wellbore fluids are contraindicated for contact with electrical activators due to their deleterious effects thereon. Moreover, with regard to the latter, force generation in an electric activator that rivals the force generating capacity of hydraulic activators, requires a significant increase in size of the activator relative to the hydraulic activators. Wellbore space is always at a premium so that it is desirable to maintain activator size as small as possible. To realize this goal, some embodiments minimize the effect of tubing pressure on the tool being electrically actuated. This will minimize the forces that the electric actuator must overcome when actuating the tool. While clearly this will facilitate the use of actuators having less force generating capacity, rendering a force transmitter in a valve insensitive to tubing pressure is useful for any type of actuator including hydraulic actuators. In the disclosure hereof, activators of both lesser and greater force generating capacity are addressed.
Referring to
The force transmitter 16 itself defines a fluid conduit 32 therein that extends from one end 34 of the force transmitter 16 substantially axially to a dog leg 36 where the conduit 32 is directed to an annular space 38 defined between the force transmitter 16, the bore 14, the seal 20 and the force transmitter ring seal 30. This annular space 38 is sealed and thus will deadhead any fluid in the conduit 32. It is thereby invisible functionally with respect to an opening operation of the ESCSSV. The purpose of the conduit 32, dogleg 34 and annular space 38 is to ensure that the force transmitter is biased to a valve closed condition if one or more of the seal 20 fails. Alternately stated, the annular space 38 only becomes a functional part of the ESCSSV if and when the seal 20 is breached by tubing pressure applied thereto. This function will be further described hereunder.
The force transmitter 16 is further in operable communication with a flow tube 40 of the ESCSSV 10 such that the flow tube 40 is urged toward a flapper valve 42 to open the same upon activation of the ESCSSV 10. Any means for causing the flow tube 40 to move with the force transmitter is acceptable. In one embodiment, an interengagement 44 could simply be a tab on the force transmitter 16 as shown that is sufficiently strong to maintain structural integrity against a power spring 46 and any pressure differential across a flapper 48.
In this embodiment, chamber 24 is filled with a compressible fluid at a pressure easily overcomable by increased hydraulic pressure in chamber 22 or by an electric activator directly acting upon the force transmitter. In one embodiment, the pressure in chamber 24 is atmospheric pressure. The fluid may be air, for example, but in any event will be selected to have chemical properties not contraindicated for the type of activator utilized and in contact therewith.
Upon pressurization of chamber 22 by source 26, the force transmitter 16 moves farther into chamber 24 than is depicted in
In the event that seal 20 fails while the valve 10 is in the downhole environment, tubing pressure will enter annulus 38. The pressure in annulus 38 is transmitted through dogleg 36 and conduit 32 to chamber 24. Pressure in this chamber will cause the valve 10 to fail closed. Alternately, if seal 18 fails, pressure is directly transmitted to chamber 24 with the same result of biasing the valve 10 to a closed position. A failure of both seals 18 and 20 will also result in a biasing of the valve to a closed position.
In another embodiment, referring to
Referring to
With the embodiment of
For use in connection with the foregoing embodiments or other configurations is an electrically based activator illustrated in
The permanent magnet carrier 110 is operably connected to a piston 120 and hence is intended to be translatable relative to the coil carrier 112, upon activation. A plurality of permanent magnets 122 are mounted at the permanent magnet carrier 110. In one embodiment the permanent magnets are Samarium Cobalt (SmCo) magnets and in another embodiment are Neodymium (Nd) magnets. It is to be understood however that other permanent magnet material may be employed if desired. In one embodiment the magnets 122 are arranged as annular structures with their poles radially oriented. The annular structures may be full annular structures or may be broken annular configurations using an array of individual magnets arranged generally annularly. Regardless of particular construction, each annular magnet or array of magnets will have a pole at its radially inside dimension 124 and a pole at its radially outside dimension 126. Adjacent annular magnets or annular arrays of magnets are arranged to have one pole at the inside dimension of a first magnet 122 and the opposite pole at the inside dimension of the next magnet 122. The switching of pole orientations continues for the number of annular arrays that are present in the permanent magnet carrier 110 such that when viewing the activator 100 in cross section as depicted in
As illustrated there are ten permanent magnets but this is not intended to be viewed as a limitation. Rather it is contemplated that as many or as few magnets desired may be built into a particular system. The number of magnets is related to one or more of the total stroke required, coil groove thickness/depth, wire gauge, slot fill, magnet strength, magnet thickness/width, and optimal relationship between the number of magnets to the number of coils. These parameters are calculated using methods well known in the art and described in the book by Baldea and Nassar identified and incorporated by reference herein below. There will also be an overlap of the movable carrier 110 or 112 so that generated force along the stroke of the tool will remain substantially constant.
Returning to the coil carrier (whether 110 or 112), and with reference to
It is to be appreciated that the permanent magnets 122 are positioned at the radially inside surface of the permanent magnet carrier 110 and the coils 136, 138, etc. are positioned at the radially outside surface of the coil carrier 112 so that an air gap between the permanent magnets and the coils is minimized.
The activator 100 as described is capable of actuating the ESCSSV 116 using a very small amount of power, which is on the order of about 200 watts. As long as power is maintained the ESCSSV will remain open; when power is lost (planned or unplanned), the valve 116 will close in accordance with known safety valve mechanics reliant on a power spring 150.
Referring now to
While preferred embodiments have been shown and described, modifications and substitutions may be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the present invention has been described by way of illustrations and not limitation.
May, Michael J., Ranjan, Priyesh, Lake, Gary, Murray, Douglas, Rainone, Michael, Sackett, Samuel, Presley, Talbot
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
10107075, | Mar 24 2015 | WEATHERFORD TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS, LLC | Downhole isolation valve |
10655431, | Mar 11 2016 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Bypass diverter sub for subsurface safety valves |
10920529, | Dec 13 2018 | Tejas Research & Engineering, LLC | Surface controlled wireline retrievable safety valve |
11015418, | Jun 06 2018 | BAKER HUGHES, A GE COMPANY, LLC | Tubing pressure insensitive failsafe wireline retrievable safety valve |
11905790, | Feb 24 2020 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Safety valve with electrical actuators |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2785755, | |||
3755706, | |||
4687054, | Mar 21 1985 | Linear electric motor for downhole use | |
5252043, | Jan 10 1990 | UNIFLO OILCORP, LTD | Linear motor-pump assembly and method of using same |
5409356, | Jun 11 1992 | Well pumping system with linear induction motor device | |
5620048, | Sep 30 1994 | Elf Aquitaine Production | Oil-well installation fitted with a bottom-well electric pump |
5734209, | Jan 10 1990 | Uniflo Oilcorp, Ltd. | Linear electric motor and method of using and constructing same |
5831353, | Oct 17 1994 | UNIFLO OILCORP, LTD | Modular linear motor and method of constructing and using same |
5917774, | Sep 26 1997 | Western Atlas International, Inc.; Western Atlas International, Inc | Magnetic motion coupling for well logging instruments |
5959374, | Jun 07 1995 | Parker Intangibles LLC | Electromagnetic actuator |
5960875, | Mar 29 1996 | Elf Exploration Production | Electric pump having a linear motor |
6039014, | Jun 01 1998 | Eaton Corporation | System and method for regenerative electromagnetic engine valve actuation |
6619388, | Feb 15 2001 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Fail safe surface controlled subsurface safety valve for use in a well |
6926504, | Jun 26 2001 | TOTAL FINA ELF; ENI S P A ; SHELL INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION B V | Submersible electric pump |
6988556, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.; Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Deep set safety valve |
7145271, | Feb 21 2002 | ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC | High performance linear motor and magnet assembly therefor |
7213653, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Deep set safety valve |
7252053, | Mar 26 2004 | Bose Corporation | Electromagnetic actuator and control |
7316270, | Nov 23 2005 | WONG, YEN-HONG | Oil pumping unit using an electrical submersible pump driven by a circular linear synchronous three-phase motor with rare earth permanent magnet |
7370709, | Sep 02 2004 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc | Subterranean magnetic field protective shield |
7373971, | Aug 24 2004 | Crostek Management Corp. | Pump jack and method of use |
7434626, | Feb 19 2002 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Deep set safety valve |
7686597, | Mar 03 2004 | BSH HAUSGERÄTE GMBH | Linear drive device provided with an armature body having a magnet carrier |
7743833, | Jan 24 2008 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Pressure balanced piston for subsurface safety valves |
8267167, | Nov 23 2009 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | Subsurface safety valve and method of actuation |
20010026204, | |||
20020000904, | |||
20030121665, | |||
20040003849, | |||
20050087335, | |||
20060157255, | |||
20060261300, | |||
20070284118, | |||
20070289734, | |||
20070295515, | |||
20080053662, | |||
20080066921, | |||
20080110611, | |||
20080191155, | |||
20080272870, | |||
20080314599, | |||
20090250206, | |||
20090277687, | |||
20100025045, | |||
20110120728, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Aug 13 2009 | Baker Hughes Incorporated | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / | |||
Aug 26 2009 | RANJAN, PRIYESH | Baker Hughes Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0299 | |
Aug 26 2009 | MURRAY, DOUGLAS | Baker Hughes Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0299 | |
Aug 27 2009 | LAKE, GARY | Baker Hughes Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0299 | |
Aug 27 2009 | MAY, MICHAEL J | Baker Hughes Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0299 | |
Sep 10 2009 | RAINONE, MICHAEL | PRODUCTION CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0364 | |
Sep 10 2009 | SACKETT, SAMUEL | PRODUCTION CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0364 | |
Sep 10 2009 | PRESLEY, TALBOT | PRODUCTION CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, INC | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0364 | |
Oct 16 2009 | PRODUCTION CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT, INC | Baker Hughes Incorporated | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 023493 | /0402 |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Aug 24 2017 | M1551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Year, Large Entity. |
Aug 19 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 04 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 04 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 04 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 04 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 04 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 04 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 04 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 04 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 04 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 04 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 04 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 04 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |