The invention proposes a method and apparatus for determination of transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver. Among others, the invention allows to determine the transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver by a tier device, for example a transmission quality testing or monitoring device.
|
9. A transmission quality monitoring device for non intrusive determination of a transmission quality of a first communication link between a transmitter device and a receiver device, said transmission quality monitoring device comprising:
a first network interface for reception of first data packets from the transmitter device;
a memory for storing of at least part of said first data packets as reference data packets;
a second network interface for reception of retransmitted data packets, said retransmitted data packets being at least part of said first data packets that are transmitted from the transmitter device to the receiver device via said first communication link, received by the receiver device, and retransmitted by the receiver to said transmission quality monitoring device via a second communication link between the receiver device and said transmission quality monitoring device, the second communication link being different from the first communication link of which transmission quality is to be determined;
a controller for determination of transmission quality of said first communication link between the transmitter device and the receiver device through comparison between said reference data packets and said retransmitted data packets.
1. A method of non-intrusive determination of a transmission quality of a first communication link between a transmitter device and a receiver device, said method being implemented by a transmission quality monitoring device, wherein said method comprises the following steps:
reception, by said transmission quality monitoring device, from said transmitter device, of first data packets and storing of at least part of said first data packets as reference data packets;
reception, by said transmission quality monitoring device, of retransmitted packets, said retransmitted packets being at least part of said first data packets that are transmitted from said transmitter device to said receiver device via said first communication link, received by said receiver device, and retransmitted by said receiver device to said transmission quality monitoring device via a second communication link, said second communication link being different from said first communication link of which transmission quality is to be determined;
determination, by said transmission quality monitoring device, of said transmission quality of said first communication link between said transmitter device and said receiver device through comparison between said reference data packets and said retransmitted packets.
2. The method according to
3. The method according to
4. The method according to
5. The method according to
6. The method according to
7. The method according to
8. The method according to
10. The device according to
11. The device according to
|
This application claims the benefit, under 35 U.S.C. §119 of EP Patent Application 10305535.6, filed 20 May 2010.
The present invention relates to the field of remote testing of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver. More particularly, the present invention relates to determination of quality of reception of a digital data stream that is transmitted by a transmitter and received by the receiver via the communication link.
US Patent Application 2008/0095325 (Chilton et al, hereinafter “Chilton”) describes remote reception of CPE (Customer Premise Equipment) information from a CPE. Network status information is received from a communications network indicative of a current operational status for the network. Then, a recommended customer service center is selected from a plurality of customer service centers based upon at least one of the CPE information and the network status information.
US Patent Application 2005/0220033 (DelRegno et al., hereinafter <<DelRegno>>) describes an apparatus and method for performing automated testing and trouble isolation of a communication link in an access network. According to DelRegno, a control system in the network determines a need for a loopback test, and instructions are transmitted from the control system to a test frame originator. The test frame originator creates a test pattern flow and injects the test pattern in the communication link and prepares to receive looped-back test pattern and analyses the results. If errors are detected, the results are transmitted to the control system. The loopback is established by a device that is closely connected to the device for which the communication link is to be tested, and the test frame originator is located somewhere in the communication link to be tested. According to DelRegno, in order to allow concurrent testing of the communication link and the communication link continuing to carry customer traffic during the test, the tests are made on the OSI (Open Systems Interconnect) layer 2 (data link layer), making it possible to use only a portion of the link bandwidth for the testing.
The prior art solutions for performing testing and trouble isolation of a communication link are not optimized. Chilton for example, receives network status information is received from a communications network indicative of a current operational status for the network, not from the real status of the whole communication link that leads from the transmitter to the receiver. DelRegno only tests part of a communications link that is used for transmission of data to the device to test, i.e. the part of the link that is common with the part of the link that connects the frame originator to the device to test. In addition, DelRegno only tests with a test pattern, which does not correspond to real-life data; it is well known for the skilled in the art that some errors only occur with real-life data. In addition, DelRegno only tests at the data link layer, and errors that only occur at higher layers will thus not be detected. In addition, DelRegno uses for the test frames the communication link that is interconnects the transmitter and the receiver, and the method of DelRegno is thus potentially intrusive.
The current prior art solutions of determination of a quality of a communication link are thus not optimized.
The invention proposes a method and apparatus for remote determination of transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver.
Among others, the invention allows to determine the transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver by a tier device, for example a transmission quality testing or monitoring device. Among the advantages of the method procured by the invention when compared to prior art solutions, are the immediate retransmission of data really received by the receiver. The immediate character of the retransmission procures a real-time aspect to the retransmission, which accelerates analysis of the retransmitted data for analysis and reduces delay between occurrence of errors and intervention for taking the right measures to avoid these errors. The immediate retransmission also avoids the need for storage space for the retransmission packets in the retransmitting device. The retransmission of the data without modifying i.e. ‘as received’ (which does not exclude adding data such as timestamps, or enveloping the data in other packets order to adapt to a transmission of the data using a different protocol), allows good analysis of the data as it is really received by the retransmitting device, and thus allows to isolate errors that occur on the particular connection of the retransmitting device, such as errors occurring only on the ‘last mile’ of a communication link, which can be caused by, for example, overcharging a communication link with traffic that exceeds the communication link's maximum bandwidth capacity, and includes detection of reception errors due to faulty connectors or faulty wiring in a user's home for example (including the use of non adapted wiring such as non-shielded cabling, resulting in data loss due to interference with adjacent cabling, or cabling with wrong impedance, resulting in disturbed propagation of signals on a coaxial cable). It also allows to detect errors that occur due to a retransmitting device malfunctioning, such as a defective reception interface or digital reception circuit. As will be explained furtheron, the retransmitted data can be retransmitted on another link than the link over which the retransmitted data is received by the retransmitter, and/or the received data can be retransmitted by using a sampling method, thereby not retransmitting all received data, but only samples, which has an obvious advantage of reducing bandwidth for retransmission. The non-intrusive character of the invention, i.e. the remote determination according to the invention does not influence on the quality of transmission on the communication link of which the transmission quality is to be determined. One of other advantages is the possibility to if errors are detected on a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver, to find the part (s) of the communication link which are causing the errors. Also, the method of the invention is not limited to OSI level 2 and thus allows to determine the transmission quality on OSI level 3 (network layer), which allows to obtain important information on for example a relation of the error rate to a QoS used (Quality of Service). When using the method to determine the transmission quality on OSI level 4 (transport layer), the method allows to detect duplication of packets in the network comprising the communication link, and thus obtain important information on the existence of multiple paths. When using the method to determine the transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver on an OSI level higher than level 4 (session layer: 5, presentation layer: 6, application layer: 7), disparity between transmission qualities of the different application data streams can be detected. All of these advantages and other advantages not mentioned here but that will become clear through the detailed description of the invention that follows make the method advantageously well suited for determination of transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver.
According to the invention, at least some of the packets of a digital data transmission received from a transmitter device by a receiver device via the communication link of which the transmission quality is to be determined, (referred to hereafter as ‘communication link’) are immediately retransmitted without modification to a transmission quality determination device (hereafter referred to as ‘TQD device’) that wishes to determine the transmission quality of the communication link. This immediate retransmission takes place over another communication link, hereinafter referred to as ‘retransmission link’, different from the communication link of which the transmission quality is to be determined. The separation between the communication link and retransmission link allows being completely non-intrusive with regard to the transmission over the communication link, i.e. the test does not influence the result. Due to the immediateness of the retransmission, no storage is necessary in the receiver device for the packets that are retransmitted, which is advantageous when the packets belong to voluminous data, such as audio and/or video data. Another advantage of the immediate retransmission is that analysis by the TQD device is done on on-line, real-time received data, and any results of the analysis by the TQD device are available quickly after transmission of the data to the receiver device and thus intervention to repair a data link or to reroute data on another link is fast. According to different embodiments, the difference of the links is either logical or physical, i.e. the communication link and the retransmission link are implemented as physically different links, for example via different cables, or logically different links, e.g. using a same cable but using different modulation frequencies for the communication link and the retransmission link. According to the invention, retransmitted packets, i.e packets received by the receiver device from the transmitter over the communication link that are retransmitted by the receiver device over the retransmission link are then compared in the TQD device with so-called reference packets, i.e. comprising at least part of the same packets as transmitted by the transmitter over the communication link. According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the retransmitted packets are enveloped in other packets during the immediate retransmission, in order to adapt them to a typical data communication protocol to be used for transmission of data over the retransmission link. From this comparison a transmission quality of the communication link is determined. Therefore, according to a first embodiment, the comparison is done by the same device as the transmitter device, having directly access to the transmitted packets. The TQD device is then integral part of the transmitter. According to a variant embodiment, the comparison is executed by a TQD device distinct from the transmitter device, connected to the transmitter device via a high quality link.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the communication link and the retransmission link use different transmission protocols. For example a communication link is a wireless terrestrial broadcast communication link using the DVB-T protocol for terrestrial broadcast transmission, whereas the retransmission link is an Internet Protocol (IP) link over the Internet, using the Internet Protocol for digital data transmission.
In order to determine transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver, the invention proposes a method of determination of a transmission quality of a first communication link between a transmitter and a receiver, the method comprising a step of reception of first data packets and storing of at least part of said first data packets as reference data; a step of reception of second data packets via a second communication link, referred to as retransmission link, the second data packets comprising at least part of the first data packets received by said receiver from said transmitter via the first communication link and immediately retransmitted by the receiver via the retransmission link; an a step of determination of the transmission quality of said first communication link through comparison between the first data packets received and the at least part of said first data packets comprised in the second data packets received.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the method comprises a step of associating time stamps to first data packets as they are received, and storing of these time stamps.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the determination of the transmission quality of said first communication link comprises a determination step of network jitter through a comparison of a first time difference between said first time stamps associated to subsequent first data packets with a second time difference between second time stamps associated to subsequent second data packets.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the determination of said transmission quality of the first communication link comprises a determination step of Bit Error Rate based on a comparison of the first data packets with the second data packets.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the determination of the transmission quality of the first communication link comprises a determination step of packet loss based on a comparison of the first data packets with the second data packets.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the determination of the transmission quality of the first communication link comprises a step of transmission of configuration commands to the receiver, said configuration commands comprising commands for enabling or disabling retransmission of packets received by the receiver to a device implementing the method as the second data packets.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the configuration commands comprise commands indicating for the receiver which packets that the receiver receives are to be immediately retransmitted by the receiver to a device implementing the method as the second data packets.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the configuration commands comprise an address identifying the receiver.
The invention also concerns a device for determination of a transmission quality of a first communication link between a transmitter and a receiver, the device comprising a first network interface for reception of first data packets; a memory for storing of at least part of said first data packets as reference data; a second network interface for reception of second data packets via a second communication link, referred to as retransmission link, said second data packets comprising at least part of said first data packets received by said receiver from said transmitter via said first communication link and immediately retransmitted by said receiver via said retransmission link; and a controller for determination of said transmission quality of said first communication link through comparison between said first data packets received and said at least part of said first data packets comprised in said second data packets received.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the controller further associates time stamps to first data packets as they are received via said first network interface, and comprises a memory for storing of these time stamps.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the determination of said transmission quality of said first communication link comprises a determination by said controller of network jitter by a comparison of time stamp between subsequent first data packets and subsequent second data packets.
More advantages of the invention will appear through the description of particular, non-restricting embodiments of the invention. The embodiments will be described with reference to the following figures:
The data communication network 1 comprises:
The user premises 140 comprises:
Arrow 1003 represents the communication link between the transmitter 100 and the receiver 130 of which the transmission quality is to be determined by TQD device 110. The packets transmitted by transmitter 100 to STB 130 are also received by TQD device 110, which is indicated by arrow 1000. It is supposed here that due to the quality of the communication link 1000 between the transmitter 100 and TQD device 110, for example due to relative proximity of TQD device 110 and the transmitter 100, the wireless transmission of transmitter device 100 is received without errors by TQD device 110. For the wireless transmission and reception, transmitter 100, TQD device 110 and set-top box 130 are equipped with antennas 101, respectively 111 and 131. STB 130 is further equipped with a wired network interface, allowing it to transmit and receive data to/from IP network 120 via connection 1002. TQD device 110 is also equipped with such an interface for the same purpose, allowing it to transmit and receive data to/from IP network 120 via connection 1001.
TQD device 110 receives the data packets that transmitter 100 transmits and stores at least part of the received data packets as reference data. Set-top box 130 also receives the same packets transmitted by transmitter 100 and immediately retransmits at least part of these packets on IP link 1002 to network 120 without modification. Network 120 in turn forwards the packets to TQD device 110. Then TQD device compares the reference packets with the retransmitted packets and determines there from a transmission quality of the communication link between the transmitter and the set-top box 130. According to a variant embodiment, TQD device 110 stores the data packets that it receives from transmitter 100 (=reference data) together with time stamps indicating time of reception, in order to allow detection of jitter in retransmitted packets received from device 130 through comparing differences between arrival time of subsequent packets of reference data with differences between arrival time of subsequent packets of retransmitted data. The arrival times of packets are determined based on time stamps that are associated to each of the subsequent packets (retransmitted and reference packets). A difference between arrival time (time stamp) between subsequent packets of retransmitted packets (delta-t-retransmitted) and arrival time (time stamp) between subsequent packets of retransmitted packets (delta-t-reference) means that network jitter has occurred, i.e. delta-t-retransmitted minus delta-t-reference is not equal to zero. The arrival time of retransmitted packets is the arrival time as observed by the retransmitter. The arrival time of reference packets is the arrival time as observed by the TQD device.
The ‘raw’ immediate retransmission of at least part of the packets received ('retransmitted' packets), i.e. as they are received by set-top box 130 (even though they may be enveloped in other packets to adapt to a transmission protocol used on the retransmission link) and the packets as they are transmitted by transmitter 100 (‘reference’ packets) gives the TQD device 110 precious information on the transmission quality of the communication link 1003. It can help finding the cause of a receiver device malfunctioning that is otherwise difficult to resolve without on-site intervention of a service engineer. For example, when set-top box 130 does not receive all of the packets transmitted by transmitter 100, and/or receives packets with errors, and/or receives packets out-of sequence, STB 130 may very well be capable of coping with such errors if it has means to correct them, for example by using FEC (Forward Error Correction) data. But when the errors become too important to be corrected by the error correction code, the ‘hidden’ errors become suddenly visible for the user of the set-top box. The determination of the transmission quality according to the invention can then help preventing this case to arrive by determining the transmission quality of the communication link and if transmission quality is determined to be approaching the power of correction of the error correction code, to take preventive measures, for example reinforce the error correction code, change the QoS (Quality of Service) class of the transmission or change the bit rate of the transmission, configuring the set top box to choose only streams which have lower bit rate, transmit a new service list to the receiver with lower-bit rate services, etc. The determination of the transmission quality of the communication link can thus serve to optimize services distribution provided to the receiver via the communication link and to optimize the quality of the services offered to a user. The previous example showed that measures are taken when it is determined that transmission quality is insufficient or nearly insufficient. On the other hand, it may also happen that a transmission quality is determined to be largely sufficient, allowing for example the transmission of HDTV services, rather than SDTV services. This can happen for example if recent work on the communication link copper parts of the communication link have been replaced by optical fiber or particular network equipment in the communication link from the transmitter to the receiver is replaced by better performing equipment.
Because of its non-intrusive determination of transmission quality of a communication link, it is possible to use the invention in fully operational environments. This has many advantages, such as allowing regular determination of transmission quality of communication links without perturbing receptions of transmissions, for statistical surveillance or error surveillance. An operator may thus very well use the invention to monitor specific communication links for users that have reported intermittent device malfunctioning.
The determination of the transmission quality according to the invention makes it not only possible to detect errors, but also to determine that a communication link is of a certain quality that allows certain types of transmissions for example high-definition television (HDTV) to be transmitted, or on the contrary, that does not allow HDTV transmissions, but that supports very well the transmission of SDTV services (standard definition television). The invention thus allows an operator to adapt the service offer to the quality of the communication link used for the transmission. In a more refined manner, the invention allows an operator to choose the error correction method that is best adapted to the quality of the communication link; for example, it allows him to choose the right power of correction of associated FEC (Forward Error Correction). According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the determination of transmission quality can serve the receiver, such as STB 130 of
According to the embodiment of
According to a variant embodiment, the set-top box 130 uses the RTP protocol to transmit the MPEG2TS packets. Typically, the RTP packet can contain seven MPEG2TS packets of a length of 188 bytes. According to this embodiment, the RTP packet header comprises a timestamp that gives the time of reception by the set-top box 130 of the packets in the RTP payload, indicating the time of reception for all or only some of the packets in the payload, for example the reception time of the first packet, or of the last packet in the payload. This variant allows among others the TQD device to determine the jitter that occurs on the communication link for which the transmission quality is to be determined, then the TQD device 110 compares time stamps that it has stored together with the reference data received from device 100 with the time stamps included in the RTP header. For this purpose, the time difference between subsequent time-stamped packets of reference data is compared with the time difference between subsequent time-stamped retransmitted data.
The RTP headers enable adding of information to the packets received from transmitter 100. Sending at least some of the packets received from transmitter 100 as retransmitted packets enveloped in RTP packets to the TQD device 110 also allows the TQD device to determine if the packets that were received by the receiver device comprise out-of sequence errors, thanks to the sequence numbering feature of RTP. In cases where an external signal perturbs the transmission on the communication link, for example due to crosstalk, the timestamps may also be of help to determine the character of the signal (the relation between perturbation and time becomes visible with help of the timestamps), and may help in tracking of the cause of the perturbation.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, not all packets as received by set-top box 130 are immediately transmitted, but only some are immediately retransmitted while others are not retransmitted at all. This allows reducing the bandwidth taken for the immediate retransmission via the retransmission link. This variant is advantageous among others when the maximum sustained bit rate of the retransmission link 1002-1001 is lower than the bit rate of the packets received over the communication link 1003 by the receiver 130, which is for example the case for IP uplinks. According to this variant, only packets belonging to one stream component of an MPEG2TS audio/video stream are transmitted; and/or packets are picked from the transmission received by the receiver 130 on a regular interval and then immediately retransmitted, i.e. through a sampling method. According to a further optimization of this embodiment, the receiver 130 is remotely configurable so that the PID of a stream component for which packets are to be retransmitted can be set, and/or so that the sampling rate i.e. the interval with which packets are to be picked and are to be immediately retransmitted can be set. According to a variant embodiment, the receiver STB 130 determines itself the sampling rate as a function of the bandwidth available on the retransmission link, and indicates the sampling rate in for example a header of the retransmitted packets so that the TQD device has knowledge of the sampling period and does not wrongly interpret packets that are missing (i.e. packets from in between the sampling moments) as lost packets.
According to yet another variant embodiment, the previous embodiments are combined, thereby allowing to reduce the bandwidth taken on the communication link, and to add precious information on when the packets were received through the timestamps added to the RTP header.
According to a variant embodiment, the immediate retransmission according to the described embodiments is a configurable feature of the receiver, in the embodiment of
DOCSIS CMTS 214 via connection 2006, is to provide time to all cable modems on the network according to the DOCSIS standard, such as to cable modem (not shown) integrated in STB 230. The role of the TFTP server 211 that is connected to DOCSIS CMTS 214 via connection 2004 is to provide configuration files to all cable modems in the network and to provide software upgrade images for the cable modems, according to the DOCSIS standard, such as to cable modem (not shown) integrated in STB 230.
In particular, according to the variant embodiment of
It is noted that the word “register” used in the description of memories 500 and 510 designates in each of the mentioned memories, a low-capacity memory zone capable of storing some binary data, as well as a high-capacity memory zone, capable of storing an executable program, or a whole data set, such as a complete web interface, or a complete list of modules.
Processing unit 520 can be implemented as a microprocessor, a custom chip, a dedicated (micro-) controller, and so on. ROM memory 500 can be implemented in any form of non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, non-volatile random-access memory, EPROM (Erasable Programmable ROM), and so on.
The ROM memory 500 comprises notably a register 501 that holds a program representing an executable program comprising the method of determination of a transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver. The ROM memory 500 further comprises a list of addresses of remote configurable devices, such as those of set-top box 130, in register 502. When powered up, the microprocessor 520 loads the instructions comprised in ROM register 501, copies them to RAM register 510, and executes them.
The RAM memory 510 comprises notably:
Other device architectures than illustrated by
Reference data packets 2000 are received and stored in data storage 605, time-stamped with the help of an internal clock (not shown). Stored reference packets are then provided to three comparators, one comparator 601 for BER detection (Bit Error Rate), a second comparator 602 for MPEG2 packet error detection, and a third comparator 603 for detection of network jitter.
Comparator 601 determines bit error rate based on a number of bits in the retransmitted packets 2007 that have been altered with regard to reference packets stored in storage 605, for example due to noise, interference or distortion.
Comparator 602 detects MPEG2 packet errors such as header or payload errors, when comparing immediately retransmitted MPEG2 packets received via 2007 with stored MPEG2 packets from storage 605. With such a comparator, it is possible for example to detect MPEG2 packet loss.
Comparator 603 detects network jitter by comparing arrival time between subsequent packets of retransmitted packets 2007 with arrival time between subsequent packets of reference packets 2000 stored in storage 605. The arrival times of packets are determined based on time stamps that are associated to each of the subsequent packets (retransmitted and reference packets). A difference between arrival time (time stamp) between subsequent packets of retransmitted packets 2007 (delta-t-retransmitted) and arrival time (time stamp) between subsequent packets of retransmitted packets (delta-t-reference) means that network jitter has occurred, i.e. delta-t-retransmitted minus delta-t-reference is not equal to zero. The arrival time of retransmitted packets is the arrival time as observed by the retransmitter. The arrival time of reference packets is the arrival time as observed by the TQD device.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention applied to the Internet Protocol, comparators in the TQD device comprise Internet Protocol BER comparators, that determine BER for example per service (based on a specific IP address and port number on which the service is transmitted); TCP/RTP comparators, that compare sequence numbers comprised in TCP/RTP headers of retransmitted packets and determine the existence of multiple path (the existence of multiple paths is proven when multiple packets are received with same sequence numbers; when multiple paths are found, an operator can be warned to suppress the multiple path); MPEG2TS comparators that extract specific data from retransmitted packets 2007 determine BER and/or packet loss related to a specific packets, such as SI (Service Information) packets, PSI (Program Service Information) packets, PID (Packet Identifier) packets. This can give important information on the communication link to test, for example audio packets (characterized by a specific PID) are transferred without error but video packets (characterized by another specific PID) are transferred with errors, possibly indicating a bandwidth problem on the tested communication link because video packets are transmitted with higher bit rate than audio packets.
According to a variant embodiment of the invention, the output of all comparators is used to establish a value for quality of service of the tested communication link, making general comparison between communication link quality of service possible between distinct communication links. As an example, given the variant embodiment illustrated in
According to a variant embodiment, quality of service is determined per comparator, making detailed comparison and analysis possible, resulting in a detailed view of the type of errors that occur on a tested communication link. Then, detailed measures are also possible, as for example increasing the bandwidth of the tested communication link when high-bit rate video PID packets have low quality of service, or adding additional FEC redundancy.
The method begins with an initialization phase 700 during which the different variables and parameters needed for the functioning of the device 110, 210, 300 respectively 410 are updated, for example, the copying of the program ‘prog’ from ROM register 501 to RAM register 511, and the initialization of data and variables in RAM register 515 of TQD device 110.
Then, during a step 701, the device 110, 210, 300 respectively 410 receives first data packets from for example device 100, 200, 300 respectively 400 and stores at least part of these packets as reference data for example in reference buffer 512 of TQD device 110.
During a step 702, the device 110, 210, 300 respectively 410 receives second data packets from for example set-top box 130, 230, 330, respectively 430 or coupler 215, relay 420 or relay 425 and optionally stores at least part of these packets as test packets data for example in reference buffer 513 of TQD device 110.
In a step 703, the device 110, 210, 300 respectively 410 determines transmission quality of at least part of the communication link 1003, 2009-2008-2003, 3000-3001, 4000-4002, via which set-top box 130, 230, 330, respectively 430 receives packets that it retransmits as second packets to device 110, 210, 300 respectively 410.
Then step 701 is iterated, illustrated by arrow 704.
Naturally, the invention is not limited to the embodiments previously described.
In particular, the invention is not limited to the data communication network architectures as described in respect of
In particular, the device 110, 210, 300, respectively 410 (TQD device) and device 130, 230, 330, respectively 430 (device for which the transmission quality of the communication link is to be determined) may be implemented as a dedicated device, or as general hardware equipment, such as a Personal Computer, running software application programs that allows it to implement the functions as described.
In particular, user premises 140, 240, 340 respectively 440 comprise more or less equipment than previously described.
According to the illustrated embodiments, the device for which the transmission quality of the communication link is to be determined is depicted as a set-top box (
The method for determination of a transmission quality of a communication link between a transmitter and a receiver may use remote-configurable receivers, using protocols for configuration, control, diagnostics and usage statistics retrieval, for example through the SNMP (Simple Network Management Protocol) protocol or the CWMP (Consumer Premises Equipment—Wide Area Network Management Protocol) protocol and its extensions, or any other standardized or proprietary messages exchange protocol.
Using SNMP, the invention can be implemented by having an SNMP manager in the TQD device and an SNMP agent in the receiver device for which the transmission quality of a communication link linking it to a transmitter is to be determined and by adding a MIB (Management Information) with a specific attribute for the management of enabling and disabling of packet retransmission to the receiver device. For this embodiment, MIB attributes can be added on the level of the receiver device for example with the name <<setRetransmission>> of an enumerated type, allowing the values described hereunder, accessible in read and write mode:
The value RETRANSMISSION_OFF means that no retransmission is done of packets received via a determined communication link. The value RETRANSMISSION_ON means that retransmission is done of packets received via a determined communication link.
As previously mentioned, the invention can also be implemented with the use of the CWMP protocol. This protocol is defined in the TR-069 (short for Technical Report 069) specification entitled CPE WAN Management Protocol (CWMP).
The TR-069 specification defines an application layer protocol for remote management of end-user devices. As a bidirectional SOAP/HTTP based protocol it provides the communication between CPE and Auto Configuration Servers (ACS). It includes both a safe auto configuration of CPE devices and the control of other CPE management functions within an integrated framework. TR-069 is the current standard for remote configuration of devices in the range of DSL broadband market. According to a particular embodiment based on the TR-069 standard, the invention is implemented by adding an ACS (Auto Configuration Server) on the level of the TQD device. In the receiver device of which the transmission quality of the communication link linking it to a transmitter is to be determined, a CWMP client is added as well as an object comprising the specific attributes for the management of the enabling/disabling, and for example configuration of sample period of the retransmission feature.
Bouvet, Philippe, Le Goue, Yvon
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
9300410, | Jun 30 2007 | Receiver calibration |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
3934224, | Oct 29 1974 | Honeywell Information Systems, Inc. | Apparatus for continuous assessment of data transmission accuracy in a communication system |
6600759, | Dec 18 1998 | ZARLINK SEMICONDUCTOR INC | Apparatus for estimating jitter in RTP encapsulated voice packets received over a data network |
6760309, | Mar 28 2000 | Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP | Method of dynamic prioritization of time sensitive packets over a packet based network |
6765904, | Aug 10 1999 | Texas Instruments Incorporated | Packet networks |
6792470, | Mar 02 2000 | Sovereign Peak Ventures, LLC | Method and apparatus for communicating with data frames having priority levels |
6873600, | Feb 04 2000 | AT&T Corp | Consistent sampling for network traffic measurement |
6965573, | Oct 22 1999 | RAKUTEN GROUP, INC | Network system |
7031311, | Jul 23 2001 | ACME PACKET, INC | System and method for providing rapid rerouting of real-time multi-media flows |
7075981, | May 19 2000 | Telchemy, Incorporated | Dynamic quality of service monitor |
7142517, | Sep 24 2002 | Accton Technology Corporation | Method for objective playout quality measurement of a packet based network transmission |
7257087, | Oct 04 2002 | Viavi Solutions Inc | System and method to calculate round trip delay for real time protocol packet streams |
7284051, | Dec 28 1998 | Fujitsu Limited | Relaying apparatus for use in a network system |
7295549, | Feb 14 2003 | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | Source and channel rate adaptation for VoIP |
7298736, | Oct 02 2002 | AT&T Corp | Method of providing voice over IP at predefined QoS levels |
7342880, | Feb 14 2002 | KDDI Corporation | Video information transmission system, and apparatus and program used for video information transmission system |
7366790, | Jul 24 2003 | Dynatrace LLC | System and method of active latency detection for network applications |
7519006, | Nov 26 2003 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and apparatus for measuring one-way delay at arbitrary points in network |
7680063, | Nov 10 2006 | Google Technology Holdings LLC | Method and apparatus for synchronizing transmissions from multiple transmitters |
7729268, | Jun 28 2002 | NTT DoCoMo, Inc | Method and apparatus for quality of service determination |
7747729, | Jun 14 2002 | ZARBAÑA DIGITAL FUND LLC | Determining client latencies over a network |
8018850, | Feb 23 2004 | Sharp Kabushiki Kaisha | Wireless video transmission system |
8165011, | Jun 13 2008 | INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 192 LLC | Real-time network measurement |
8274905, | Aug 22 2006 | CenturyLink Intellectual Property LLC | System and method for displaying a graph representative of network performance over a time period |
20020141392, | |||
20030048812, | |||
20030072269, | |||
20040190459, | |||
20050096080, | |||
20050220028, | |||
20050265383, | |||
20060018266, | |||
20060187927, | |||
20060203737, | |||
20080056145, | |||
20080095247, | |||
20080151885, | |||
20080186866, | |||
20080298271, | |||
20090086645, | |||
20090109965, | |||
20090116397, | |||
20090135724, | |||
20090310574, | |||
20100121974, | |||
20100135171, | |||
20110038270, | |||
20110182248, | |||
20110211464, | |||
DE10064538, | |||
WO188763, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
May 16 2011 | GOUE, YVON LE | Thomson Licensing | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026428 | /0796 | |
May 19 2011 | BOUVET, PHILIPPE | Thomson Licensing | ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS | 026428 | /0796 | |
May 19 2011 | Thomson Licensing | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Nov 06 2017 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Apr 23 2018 | EXP: Patent Expired for Failure to Pay Maintenance Fees. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Mar 25 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Sep 25 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 25 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Mar 25 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Mar 25 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Sep 25 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 25 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Mar 25 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Mar 25 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Sep 25 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Mar 25 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Mar 25 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |