The disclosure concerns a projection objective, which can include an object plane in which an object field is formed, an entry pupil, a mirrored entry pupil (RE) in a mirrored entry pupil plane obtained by mirroring the entry pupil (VE) at the object plane, an image plane, an optical axis, at least a first mirror and a second mirror. The projection objective can have a negative back focus of the entry pupil, and a principal ray originating from a central point of the object field and traversing the objective from the object plane to the image plane can intersect the optical axis in at least one point of intersection, wherein the geometric locations of all points of intersection lie between the image plane and the mirrored entry pupil plane.
|
1. A projection objective having an entry pupil, an exit pupil, an object plane, an image plane, and a light path between the object plane and the image plane, the projection objective comprising:
at least five mirrors arranged in the light path,
wherein:
the projection objective has a negative back focus of the entry pupil;
the projection objective is configured so that, during use of the projection objective, the projection objective has no intermediate image along the light path between the image plane and the object plane; and
the projection objective is a microlithography projection objective.
18. A projection exposure apparatus, comprising:
an illumination system; and
a projection objective having an entry pupil, an object plane, an image plane, and a light path between the object plane and the image plane, the projection objective comprising at least five mirrors arranged in the light path,
wherein:
the projection objective has a negative back focus of the entry pupil;
the projection objective is configured so that, during use of the projection exposure apparatus, the projection objective has no intermediate image in the light path; and
the projection exposure apparatus is a microlithography projection exposure apparatus.
2. The projection objective of
3. The projection objective of
at least one of the at least five mirrors is located along the light path before the aperture stop; and
at least a different one of the at least five mirrors is located along the light path after the aperture stop.
4. The projection objective of
5. The projection objective of
6. The projection objective of
7. The projection objective of
8. The projection objective of
9. The projection objective of
10. The projection objective of
the first and second mirrors define a first partial system; and
the third, fourth, fifth and sixth mirrors define a second partial system.
11. The projection objective of
12. The projection objective of
the first and second mirrors define a first partial system; and
the third, fourth, fifth and sixth mirrors define a second partial system.
13. The projection objective of
14. The projection objective of
15. The projection of
16. The projection objective of
17. The projection objective of
19. The projection exposure apparatus of
20. The projection exposure apparatus of
at least one of the at least five mirrors is located along the light path before the aperture stop; and
at least another one of the at least five mirrors is located along the light path after the aperture stop.
21. The projection exposure apparatus of
22. The projection exposure apparatus of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/949,985, filed Nov. 19, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,094,380, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/689,672, filed Mar. 22, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,869,138, which claims benefit under U.S.C. §119 to U.S. provisional application 60/786,744, filed Mar. 27, 2006. U.S. application Ser. No. 11/689,672 also claims priority under U.S.C. §119 to German Patent Application No. 10 2006 014 380, filed on Mar. 27, 2006. The full disclosure of these earlier applications is incorporated herein by reference.
The disclosure relates to a projection objective and a projection exposure apparatus.
An illumination system has been presented in US 2005/0088760, wherein the rays reflected from a reflective object in an object plane enter the projection objective on divergent paths. In the case of an axially symmetric projection objective which has an optical axis, this means that the projection objective has a negative back focus of the entry pupil. For axially symmetric systems, this means that a positive principal ray angle γ is present at the reflective object in the object plane. In the examples presented in US 2005/0088760, the positive principal ray angle γ is less than 7° (e.g., less than 6°).
In the case of a negative back focus of the entry pupil a mirrored entry pupil in a mirrored entry pupil plane is obtained by a mirror reflection on the object plane. The mirrored entry pupil plane lies in this case to the image side of the object plane.
A positive back focus is present if the principal ray angle γ in the object plane is negative, i.e. if the principal ray of the central field point after the reflection on a reflective object in the object plane, for example on the reflective reticle, proceeds on a path that converges towards the optical axis. In the case of a positive back focus of the entry pupil, the entry pupil of the projection objective lies to the image side of the object plane and, accordingly, the mirrored entry pupil plane lies to the opposite side of the object plane.
The back focus is determined by the distance from the object plane to the point where the principal ray directed to the central field point of the illuminated field in the object plane intersects the optical axis. With a positive principal ray angle at the object or at the reticle, for example γ=8°, and with a field radius r=125 mm, the back focus SEP is obtained as SEP=−R/tan γ=−889.4 mm. In systems with a negative back focus of the entry pupil, the principal ray angle γ at the object is positive.
According to a first aspect of the disclosure, a first embodiment of a microlithography projection objective with a negative back focus of the entry pupil is proposed, which includes at least two mirrors, i.e. a first mirror (S1) and a second mirror (S2), wherein the objective is designed in such a way that each principal ray CR originating from a central point of the object field and traversing the objective from the object plane to the image plane intersects the optical axis (HA) at least once in a point of intersection that is specific to that ray, with the respective points of intersection being located geometrically between the image plane of the projection objective and the mirrored entry pupil plane of the mirrored entry pupil of the projection objective. The terms “entry pupil” and “mirrored entry pupil” are explained in more detail in
According to the first aspect of the disclosure, all points of intersection of the principal rays with the optical axis of the projection objective lie between the mirrored entry pupil plane and the image plane of the projection objective.
In an advantageous embodiment, the mirrors can be arranged with rotational symmetry relative to the optical axis HA.
In an advantageous embodiment of the disclosure, the at least one point of intersection has along the optical axis a first distance A1 to the object plane, and the mirrored entry pupil has a second distance A2 to the object plane, wherein the distances A1 and A2 conform to the rule that A2 is always smaller than A1 (e.g., A2<0.9·A1, A2<0.8·A1, A2<0.7·A1, A2<0.5·A1).
An objective of this kind leaves enough design space in the area of the mirrored entry pupil to allow for example an optical element to be arranged there.
In this application a projection objective is a projection system arranged to image radiation from an object plane to an image plane with the aid of a plurality of optical elements arranged to direct radiation from the object plane to the image plane.
In particular, if a projection objective of this kind with a negative back focus of the entry pupil is used in a projection exposure apparatus, it opens the possibility for a modular design. Projection exposure apparatus consist in general of an illumination system and a projection objective. The illumination system serves to illuminate a field in an object plane, and the projection objective serves to project an image of an object that is arranged in the object plane into an image plane. In projection exposure apparatus of modular configuration, the geometry of the ray paths is chosen so that the elements of the illumination system are arranged in a first design space and the elements of the projection objective in a second design space. Thus, the illumination system forms a first module and the projection objective forms a second module. Each of the modules can be separated from the apparatus without thereby affecting the other module. For example, if the illumination system requires servicing or adjustment, one can for example exchange the illumination system without the projection system being affected by this exchange.
Furthermore, a projection exposure apparatus of this kind is distinguished by a higher transmittance, because with a negative back focus of the entry pupil it is possible to save mirrors in the illumination system, as is described in US 2005/008760.
In systems according to the disclosure, an optical element such as for example a pupil facet mirror of a double-facetted illumination system can be arranged with a negative back focus in the area of the optical axis of the projection objective, since this design space is not needed by the mirrors of the projection objective and also since no rays of the imaging ray pattern pass through the design space taken up by a facet mirror of this kind.
In some embodiments, the projection system is configured so as to avoid a grazing-incidence mirror which would otherwise be arranged in the illumination system before the object plane for the purpose of folding the ray paths. This measure likewise serves to increase the transmittance of a microlithography projection exposure apparatus in which an objective of this kind is being used.
In certain embodiments of the disclosure, the projection objective includes at least four mirrors (e.g., at least six mirrors).
In some embodiments of the disclosure, only one aperture stop plane is formed in the projection objective. The objective can be divided into a first and a second sub-objective with a first and a second number of mirrors, wherein the second sub-objective includes the aperture stop plane. The second sub-objective can have two mirrors, i.e. the fifth and the sixth mirror in an embodiment that has a total of six mirrors, while the first sub-objective comprises the first, second, third and fourth mirrors.
The image-side numerical aperture of the projection objective with negative back focus of the entry pupil according to the disclosure can meet the condition NA≧0.2 (e.g., NA≧0.25, NA≧0.3).
In one design of the projection objective, the mirror surface of the first mirror is configured as a convex mirror surface, the mirror surface of the second mirror is configured as a concave mirror surface, the mirror surface of the third mirror is configured as a concave mirror surface, the mirror surface of the fourth mirror is configured as a convex mirror surface, the mirror surface of the fifth mirror is configured as a convex mirror surface, and the mirror surface of the sixth mirror is configured as a concave mirror surface.
In order to provide the longest possible drift paths inside the objective, it is envisioned that an embodiment of the projection objective which has at least six mirrors or exactly six mirrors is subdivided into a first partial objective with a first and a second mirror, and a second partial objective with a third, fourth, fifth and sixth mirror, wherein the geometrical distance between the first partial objective and the second partial objective along the optical axis is larger than 30% of the overall length of the objective (e.g., larger than 40% of the overall length of the objective, larger than 50% of the overall length of the objective, larger than 60% of the overall length of the objective). The term “overall length of the objective” means the distance from the object plane of the projection objective to the image plane as measured along the optical axis.
In some embodiments of the disclosure it is envisioned that in a projection objective with negative back focus of the entry pupil, an incident principal ray on its way to the first mirror (CRE) of the projection objective travels in the meridional plane of the projection objective on a path between the principal ray reflected from the mirror surface (CRR) and the optical axis (HA) of the projection objective. This is shown in
With the principal ray traveling from the object plane to its incidence on the first mirror (CRE) on a path that runs in the meridional plane of the projection objective between the principal ray reflected from the mirror surface (CRR) and the optical axis (HA) of the projection objective, one achieves the benefit that enough design space is available particularly in the anterior part of the objective for the installation of an optical element, for example the pupil facet mirror of the illumination system or a grazing-incidence mirror.
In an alternative embodiment of the projection objective it can be envisioned that at least one intermediate image may be formed in the light path from the object plane to the image plane.
In an alternative embodiment of a projection objective with negative back focus of the entry pupil, the objective is designed so that in a meridional plane of the projection objective the light path from the object plane to the first mirror (S1) crosses the light path from the second mirror (S2) to the image plane and that no further mirror is placed between the object plane and the first mirror (S1).
The term “meridional plane” in the present context means the plane that contains the optical axis (HA) of the projection objective and the central field point of the field in the object plane. Advantageously, the light path in the projection objective crosses over itself in the part of the objective that lies closest to the object plane. This part of the projection objective comprises those mirrors which have a short distance to the object plane in which the reticle is arranged. The light bundle which proceeds from the object to the first mirror can cross the light bundle which travels from the second to the third mirror. This makes it possible that in particular the second mirror can be arranged at a large distance from the optical axis. The aperture stop can be arranged between the second and the third mirror and has a large axial distance from the object plane, as does the third mirror.
A projection objective of this kind can contain four mirrors. In some embodiments, a projection objective of this type can contain six mirrors.
In the projection objectives according to the disclosure with a negative back focus of the entry pupil, the large distance of the first and second mirrors from the optical axis makes it possible to arrange an optical element, specifically an optical integrator, at or close to the point of intersection of the optical axis with the principal ray (CR) that is directed to the central field point.
In contrast to the systems with negative back focus that have been disclosed in US 2005/0088760, the embodiments of projection objectives according to the disclosure no longer require a mirror to be arranged before the object plane for the purpose of folding the light path. The transmittance of the system is thereby significantly increased. Furthermore, by using a projection objective of this kind in a projection exposure apparatus, one avoids a cross-over between the light paths in the illumination system and in the projection system, so that the projection exposure apparatus can have a modular design with regard to its spatial arrangement and technical construction.
In some embodiments of a projection objective that has an intermediate image, the latter can be formed between the fourth and the fifth mirror of the objective, if the objective contains six mirrors.
In certain embodiments where the projection objective with negative back focus in accordance with the disclosure is configured as an objective that contains six mirrors, the mirror surface of the first mirror is concave-shaped, the mirror surface of the second mirror is concave-shaped, the mirror surface of the third mirror is convex-shaped, the mirror surface of the fourth mirror is concave-shaped, the mirror surface of the fifth mirror is convex-shaped, and the mirror surface of the sixth mirror is concave-shaped.
The aperture stop can be arranged between the second and the third mirror. The image-side numerical aperture NA of the projection objective can be more than 0.2 (e.g., more than 0.25, more than 0.3).
In some embodiments, the objective according to the disclosure is a catoptric projection objective with a negative back focus of the entry pupil, an image-side wave front aberration WRMS of less than 0.01λ and on each of the mirrors a maximum angle of incidence smaller than 21°. The image-side wave front aberration can be WRMS≦0.07λ (e.g., WRMS≦0.06λ). The maximum angle of incidence in the meridional plane on each of the mirrors can be ≦20°. The symbol λ stands here for the wavelength of the light which traverses the projection objective along an imaging light path from the object plane to the image plane.
The projection objective in certain embodiments has at least four mirrors, wherein the first and the fourth mirror in a light path from the object plane to the image plane are convex mirrors.
The maximum mirror diameter of all mirrors in the meridional plane can be <190 mm (e.g., <180 mm).
All of the afore-named individual measures such as for example the size of the aperture, the number of mirrors of an objective, angle of incidence, mirror diameter etc. can be arbitrarily combined for all of the embodiments shown here without thereby deviating from the subject of the disclosure. All of these combinations are within the scope of what is being disclosed about the disclosure.
In addition to the microlithography projection objective the disclosure also provides a microlithography projection exposure apparatus. The microlithography projection exposure apparatus according to the disclosure includes an illumination system that is traversed by an illumination light bundle, and it further includes an object plane in which an object field is illuminated, and a projection objective, wherein the latter is traversed by an imaging light path from the object plane to the image plane and wherein the projection objective has an entry pupil with negative back focus. The microlithography projection exposure apparatus is designed so that the illumination light bundle which travels to the object plane from an optical component of the illumination system that is in the next-to-last position in the light path does not cross the imaging light path in a meridional plane except in the vicinity of the reflective object, i.e. at the reticle.
In a projection exposure apparatus with negative back focus of the entry pupil, it is possible to arrange an optical element, for example parts of the optical integrator, or for example the second facetted optical element—the so-called pupil facet mirror, in the area of the mirrored entry pupil. As a result, the optical imaging element for producing an image of the second facetted optical element can be omitted.
This makes it possible to specify microlithography projection exposure apparatus which in accordance with the disclosure are designed so that the transmittance is increased in comparison to known projection exposure apparatus of the state of the art with positive back focus. The term “transmittance” means that portion of the light which is emitted by the light source, passes through the microlithography projection exposure apparatus, and falls on the image plane in which the object to be projected is arranged. The number of mirrors in a microlithography projection exposure apparatus is of particular significance for the transmittance, because the reflectance of the multi-layer mirrors at EUV wavelengths is at most around 70%. If a microlithography projection exposure apparatus of a first design contains two mirrors more than a microlithography projection exposure apparatus of a second design, the transmittance in the microlithography projection exposure apparatus of the first design is reduced by the two additional mirrors approximately by a factor of 2 in comparison to the second design as the reflectance of each of the two mirrors is about 70%.
Since the respective paths of the illumination light rays and of the projection light rays are no longer crossing each other, a modular design becomes possible for the overall design of the system according to the disclosure, meaning that the illumination system can be separated from the projection objective with regard to its spatial arrangement and technical construction. The modular design is achieved by arranging the elements of the illumination system in a first design space and the elements of the projection objective in a second design space. In microlithography projection apparatus of this kind, there are very simple ways of separating the illumination system from the projection objective.
In a first embodiment of the disclosure, the layout of the projection objective is designed in such a way that the projection objective has no intermediate image in the light path from the object plane to the image plane. In an alternative embodiment, the objective has a cross-over of the ray paths in that part of the objective that is closest to the object plane, i.e. has a shorter geometrical distance to the object plane.
The illumination system of a microlithography projection exposure apparatus which comprises an objective with a negative back focus of the entry pupil can be configured in different ways.
Thus, a first embodiment can be designed in which the illumination system is a double-facetted illumination system.
A double-facetted illumination system is distinguished by having a first facetted mirror with a multitude of first facets, so-called field facets, as well as a second facetted mirror with a multitude of second facets, so-called pupil facets. As described above, a system of this kind has the second facetted element with pupil facets arranged in or near the mirrored entry pupil of the projection objective. The pupil facet mirror in some embodiments can have about 200 to 300 pupil facets which, as an option, can be designed so that they are switch-controlled whereby the correlation of the first facets to the second facets can be changed. A change in the correlation of the first to the second facets for the adjustment of the setting can be achieved in a double-facetted illumination system for example by exchanging the first facetted optical elements with field facets. In systems that are designed for a wavelength 193 nm (e.g., for wavelengths≦100 nm, for wavelengths in the range of EUV wavelengths of 10 to 30 nm), the facets are designed as reflectors, i.e., mirrors.
Instead of a double-facetted illumination system, it is also possible to specify an illumination system where a diffuser is arranged in or near the mirrored entry pupil of the projection objective. A diffuser of this kind can for example have a multitude of diffusion centers. These diffusion centers can for example be constituted by 500 to 1000 or more small mirror facets which are arranged on a carrier, or the diffusion centers can be formed by a holographic lattice. Light that falls on this diffuser is scattered in all directions by the diffusion centers.
Due to the arrangement of the diffusion centers—primarily in a round or slightly oval form—a light source is produced which scatters the incoming light from the light source in the predetermined shape, namely in an arcuate shape, into large solid-angle elements.
This kind of a design with a diffuser plate has the advantage that, in contrast to a double-facetted illumination system, one fewer optical element needs to be used for the illumination of the field in the object plane and for the illumination of a pupil plane, whereby the transmittance is increased in comparison to the double-facetted illumination system.
To control the setting of the illumination in a pupil plane, the design may include that an aperture stop is placed in the light path before or after the diffuser.
A particularly advantageous embodiment of an illumination system may include a location-variant or field dependent C or optical integrator for the illumination of the field plane as well as of a pupil plane or a conjugate pupil plane. A diffuser of this kind is also referred to as a specular reflector. Since the specular reflector does not need to be arranged in the pupil plane or in a conjugate plane associated with the pupil plane, the microlithography projection exposure apparatus can be designed in such a way that the diffuser is optimally placed in relation to other system components in the light path in the light path. The diffuser can be of a size that makes it simple to produce the individual facets with a high accuracy of their angles. The size of the mirror facet can be larger than 2 mm (e.g., larger than 3 mm, larger than 5 mm).
For an optimal, i.e. largely loss-free, illumination of the diffuser which can be designed in a kidney shape, it is intended to place an optical component before the diffuser in the light path from the light source to the diffuser, more specifically a normal incidence mirror which can be configured as a free-form surface with an off-axis conical component. A mirror of this kind is a part of a cone which does not include the cone axis. When an extra-axial segment of a cone of this kind is illuminated, one obtains a not quite complete annular illumination which largely matches the kidney shape of the diffuser.
Placing a normal-incidence mirror ahead in the light path has the further advantage of providing a filtering effect. The multi-layered coating of the normal-incidence mirror reflects in essence only the radiation in the usable part of the wavelength spectrum and thus has the result that only useful light arrives at the diffuser, i.e., light in the wavelength range of for example λ=13.5 for EUV systems. The filtering effect of the multi-layered mirror is independent of the shape of the mirror.
If the individual facets of the diffusers are to be configured as planar mirrors, a design that offers advantages in the manufacturing process, it is possible to arrange an optical element, more specifically a normal-incidence mirror in the light path after the diffuser. With this arrangement, the normal-incidence mirror that is placed behind the diffuser, projects a strongly magnified image of the light source into the object plane that contains the object which is to be illuminated. The location-variant or field dependent diffuser produces in this object plane a multitude of images of the source which are superimposed on each other. If the normal-incidence mirror is in addition designed to have refractive power, it is possible to set the scale ratio of the image by means of the normal-incidence mirror. As a result, one always obtains the same illumination in a pupil plane independent of the size of the location-variant or field dependent diffuser, based on the set imaging scale ratio.
This makes it possible to design the diffuser in a very large size, which has the advantage that due to the large surface the radiation exposure of the diffuser is reduced and the thermal stress on the diffuser is thereby reduced.
Instead of the afore-described mirror with a free-form surface with an off-axis conical component, the kidney-shaped illumination of the location-variant or field dependent diffuser can also be obtained by giving a kidney-shaped design to the collector that collects the light of the light source and reflects it onto the diffuser. Due to the small number of reflections, this concept provides a particularly efficient illumination system with a high transmittance. In some embodiments, a grazing-incidence collector can be used as collector of the microlithography projection exposure apparatus, and the ray pattern in the illumination system does not include an intermediate image. This allows the diffuser to be arranged directly before the reticle.
Examples of embodiments of the disclosure are hereinafter described and illustrated in drawings, wherein
The disclosure will now be described by referring to the drawings which represent examples without implying any limitations.
The mirrored entry pupil RE is obtained by mirroring the entry pupil VE at the object plane in which the reflective object REFLOBJ is arranged. With a negative back focus of the entry pupil VE, the mirrored entry pupil RE is formed to the image side of the object plane. In other words: the mirrored entry pupil RE and the image plane, in which e.g. the wafer is situated, lie on the same side with respect to the object plane.
The projection objective 2101 includes an optical axis 2105. As shown in
The operating wavelength λ of the microlithography projection exposure apparatus lies in the ultraviolet or extreme ultraviolet (EUV) range of the electromagnetic spectrum. The operating wavelength can for example be 193 nm or less, especially 100 nm or less. In the examples of embodiments described herein, the operating wavelength can for example be in the range of 193 nm (e.g., in the range of 157 nm, in the EUV range of wavelengths, such as 13 nm).
It is especially desirable to use radiation of a particularly short wavelength, because the optical resolution of a projection objective is generally in proportion to the operating wavelength being used. This is the reason why with the use of shorter wavelengths, projection objectives are capable of resolving smaller structures of an image than can be resolved by projection objectives that are of the same kind but use longer wavelengths.
The illumination system 2120 comprises optical components which produce a collimated light beam with a largely homogeneous intensity profile. The illumination system 2120 further comprises optical arrangements that serve to direct the light bundle 2122 onto the mask 2140. In some embodiments, the illumination system 2120 further includes components which produce a specific polarization profile of the ray bundle.
The image plane 2102 has a distance L from the object plane 2103 which is also referred to as the overall length B of the projection objective 2101.
In the examples of embodiments that are described herein, the overall length is in the range from one meter to about three meters (e.g., in the range from about 1.3 m to 2.5 m).
In certain examples of embodiments, the overall length is shorter than 2 m (e.g., shorter than 1.9 m, shorter than 1.8 m, shorter than 1.7 m, shorter than 1.6 m, shorter than 1.5 m).
The projection objective 2101 has an imaging factor that applies to the ratio of the dimensions of the field in the object plane 2103 in relation to the corresponding dimensions of the projected field in the image plane 2102. Typically, the projection objectives that are used in lithography systems are reducing projection objectives, meaning that the dimensions of the image are smaller than those of the object. In some examples, it is therefore possible for the projection objective 2101 to produce a field in the image plane 2102 with image dimensions that are reduced by a factor of 2 to 10 (e.g., by a factor 4 or 5), in comparison to the dimensions in the object plane 2103. However, it is also possible to develop projection objectives which provide a magnified image or an image of the same size as the object.
The angle of the cone of rays is related to the image-side numerical aperture (NA) of the projection objective 2101. The image-side numerical aperture can be expressed as NA=n0·sin ΘNA, wherein n0 stands for the refractive index of the medium that lies adjacent to the substrate 2150. This medium can be for example air, nitrogen, water, or a vacuum. The symbol ΘNA stands for the angle that is defined by the marginal rays of the projection objective 2101.
In general, projection objectives 2101 have a relatively large numerical aperture NA on the image side. To give an example, the image-side numerical aperture NA of the projection objective 2101 in some embodiments is larger than 0.15, in particular more than 0.20, and even larger than 0.25. The optical resolution of the projection objective 2101 generally varies as a function of the wavelength and the image-side numerical aperture NA.
The relationship between the resolution of a projection objective and the wavelength and the image-side numerical aperture can be estimated with the formula
wherein R stands for the minimal resolution of the projection objective and k is a dimension-less factor which is referred to as process factor. The process factor k varies as a function of different factors, for example the polarization properties of the image projection or the selected modes of illumination. The process factor k lies typically in the range from 0.4 to 0.8 but can also be below 0.4 or above 0.8 for special applications.
The projection objective 2101 in some embodiments has a relatively high resolution, meaning that the numerical value of R is relatively small. For example, the resolution R can have a value of 150 nm or less (e.g., 130 nm or less, 100 nm or less, 75 nm or less, 50 nm or less, 40 nm or less, 35 nm or less, 32 nm or less, 30 nm or less, 28 nm or less, 25 nm or less, 22 nm or less, 20 nm or less, 18 nm or less, 15 nm or less, 14 nm or less, 13 nm or less, 12 nm or less, 11 n nm or less, 10 nm or less). The quality of an image that is formed by the projection objective 2001 can be quantified in different ways.
For example, images can be characterized or their quality level can be quantified based on the measured or calculated deviations of the image from an ideal image point. These deviations are generally referred to as aberrations. A measure that is used to quantify the aberrations of a wave front from the ideal or desired form is known as the root-mean-square wave front aberration or RMS value WRMS. A definition of WRMS is given for example in “Handbook of Optics”, Vol. 1, 2nd part, edited by Michael Bass (McGraw Hill), Inc. 1995, on page 35.3. As a general rule, the lower the WRMS-value for an objective, the less the wave front deviates from the desired or ideal form, and the better is the quality of the image.
In some embodiments, the projection objective 2101 has very small WRMS-values of the image in the image plane 2102. For example, a projection objective 2101 can have a WRMS-value of about 0.1·λ or less (e.g., 0.07·λ, less than 0.07·λ, less than 0.06·λ, less than 0.05·λ, less than 0.045·λ, less than 0.04·λ, less than 0.035·λ, less than 0.03·λ, less than 0.025·λ, less than 0.02·λ, less than 0.015·λ, less than 0.01·λ, less than 0.008·λ, and less than 0.006·λ).
Another measure that can be used to evaluate the quality of an image is curvature of the image field, referred to as field curvature. The field curvature is defined as the peak-to-valley variation in the axial position of the focal plane as a function of the field point, in other words the maximum field variation of the focal plane. In some embodiments, the projection objective 2101 has a relatively small image field curvature for images in the image plane 2102. To mention examples, the projection objective 2101 has an image field curvature of less than 20 nm (e.g., less than 15 nm, less than 12 nm, less than 10 nm, less than 9 nm, less than 8 nm, less than 7 nm, less than 6 nm, less than 5 nm, less than 4 nm, less than 3 nm, less than 2 nm, less than 1 nm).
Another measure that can be used to evaluate the optical performance of a projection objective is the distortion. The distortion is defined as the maximum absolute value of the field-point-dependent deviation of the image point from the ideal position of the image point in the image plane. The projection objective in some examples has a relatively small distortion of 10 nm or less (e.g., 9 nm or less, 8 nm or less, 7 nm or less, 6 nm or less, 5 nm or less, 4 nm or less, 3 nm or less, 2 nm or less, 1 nm or less).
The projection objective can be a catoptric projection objective or a catadioptric projection objective. A catoptric projection objective has exclusively reflective optical element such as for example mirrors. Catadioptric systems have reflective as well as refractive optical elements.
If the objective is configured as a catoptric system, it contains a multitude of mirrors which are arranged so that the radiation that travels from a mask 2140 to a substrate 2150 is reflected in such a way that an image of the mask 2140 is formed on the surface of the substrate 2150. Special design versions of a projection objective are configured as described in the following paragraphs. Generally speaking, the number, size and structure of the mirrors is determined by the desired optical properties of the projection objective 2101 and the physical boundary conditions of the projection exposure apparatus 2100.
The number of mirrors in the projection objective 2101 can vary. Typically, the number of mirrors is tied to different requirements that are imposed on the optical properties of the objective.
In certain embodiments, the projection objective 2101 has at least two mirrors (e.g., at least four mirrors, at least five mirrors, at least six mirrors, at least seven mirrors, at least eight mirrors). In certain embodiments of the disclosure in which mirrors of the objective are arranged between the object plane and the image plane, the projection objective 2101 has an even number of mirrors, for example four, six or eight mirrors.
The projection objective 2101 generally comprises one or more mirrors of positive optical refractive power. This means in other words that the reflecting part of the mirror has a concave surface and is accordingly referred to as a concave mirror or concave-shaped mirror. The projection objective 2101 can contain two or more, for example three or more, and in particular four or more concave mirrors. The projection objective 2101 can also include one of more mirrors that have negative optical refractive power. This means that one or more of the mirrors have a reflecting portion with a convex surface. Mirrors of this kind are also called convex mirrors or convex-shaped mirrors. In some embodiments, the projection objective 2101 can have two or more, in particular three or more, and most particularly four or more convex mirrors.
In certain embodiments, the mirrors are arranged in the projection objectives 2101 in such a way that the radiation that originates from the object plane 2103 forms one or more intermediate images.
Embodiments of the disclosure that have one or more intermediate images contain two or more pupil planes. In some embodiments, an aperture stop is arranged in a physically accessible way in at least one of these pupil planes.
The mirrors are generally configured in such a way that a large proportion of the light of the operating wavelength of the projection objective that falls on the mirror surface at an angle or within an angular range is substantially being reflected. The mirrors can also be configured so that of the radiation with a wavelength λ that falls on the mirror surface, for example more than 50% is reflected (e.g., more than 60% is reflected, more than 70% is reflected, more than 80% is reflected, more than 90% is reflected). In some embodiments, the mirrors are coated with a stack of multiple layers, a so-called multi-layer stack in which the layers consist of different materials and the stack is designed so that is substantially reflects the radiation of the wavelength λ that falls on the surface. Every coating film of the stack has an optical thickness of approximately λ/4. The multi-layer stacks can comprise 20 or more layers (e.g., 30 or more layers, 40 or more layers, 50 or more layers). The multi-layer system consists for example of sets of multiple alternating layers consisting of molybdenum and silicon or molybdenum and beryllium, in order to form mirrors that reflect radiation in the range of wavelengths from 10 nm to 30 nm, for example radiation with a wavelength λ of 13 nm or 11 nm.
The mirrors in certain embodiments are made of quartz glass and coated with a single layer of aluminum. The latter, in turn, is overlaid with dielectric layers that comprise materials such as MgF2, LaF2, Al2O3, for example for wavelengths of about 193 nm.
In general, the part of the radiation that is reflected by a mirror varies as a function of the angle of incidence of the radiation on the mirror surface. As the image-producing radiation is propagated along a multitude of different paths in a catoptric projection objective, the angle of incidence of the radiation can vary between mirrors. This is illustrated in
For every mirror in the projection objective 2100, it is possible to represent the angles of incidence of the image-producing rays in a multitude of ways. One possible form of representation is through the respective maximum angle of the rays that fall on each mirror in the meridional section of the projection objective 2101. This maximum angle is referred to as Θmax. In general, the angle Θmax can vary between different mirrors of the projection objective 2101. In certain embodiments of the disclosure, the overall maximum value (Θmax)max for all mirrors of the projection objective 2101 is 60° or less (e.g., 55° or less, 50° or less, 45° or less). In some examples, the overall maximum angle (Θmax)max is relatively small, for example 40° or less (e.g., 35° or less, 30° or less, 25° or less, 20° or less).
As another possibility, the incident light on a mirror can be characterized through the angle of incidence on each mirror in the meridional section for the principal ray of the central field point of the field to be illuminated in the object plane. This angle is referred to as ΘCR. Concerning the principal ray angle ΘCR, reference is also made to what has been said hereinabove in the introductory part. It is again possible to define a maximum angle ΘCR(max) in the projection objective as the maximum principal ray angle of the central field point. This angle ΘCR(max) can be relatively small, for example smaller than 40° (e.g., smaller than 35°, smaller than 30°, smaller than 25°, smaller than 20°, smaller than 15°).
Each mirror in the projection objective 2101 can further be characterized by a range of the angles of incidence in the meridional section of the projection objective 2101. The range within which the angle Θ varies on each mirror is referred to as ΔΘ. The range ΔΘ for each mirror is defined as the difference between an angle Θ(max) and an angler Θ(min), wherein Θ(min) stands for the minimum angle of incidence of the image-forming rays that fall on a mirror surface in the meridional section of the Projection objective 2101, and Θ(max) stands for the maximum angle of the incident image-forming rays on a mirror surface, as has already been defined above. The range ΔΘ generally varies between mirrors in the projection objective 2101 and can be relatively small for some mirrors, for example smaller than 25° (e.g., smaller than 20°, smaller than 15°, smaller than 10°). On the other hand, ΔΘ can be relatively large for other mirrors in the projection objective 2101. For example, ΔΘ can be 20° or larger, in particular 25° or larger (e.g., 30° or larger, 35° or larger, 40° or larger). In some embodiments, the maximum value ΔΘmax for all ranges ΔΘ, i.e. the maximum over all mirrors of the projection objective 2101 for the respective range of variation ΔΘ on each mirror can be relatively small, for example smaller than 25° (e.g., smaller than 20°, smaller than 15°, smaller than 12°, smaller than 10°, smaller than 8°).
The mirror 2660 is symmetric relative to the meridional section 2675. The meridional plane is defined by the y- and z-axes of the local coordinate system. The mirror 2660 has a dimension My along the meridional line 2675, which can be smaller or larger than Mx. In circular mirrors, for example in mirrors that are arranged in an aperture stop plane, the dimensions Mx and My are equal, i.e., Mx=My. In some embodiments, My lies in the vicinity of 0.1 Mx(e.g., 0.2 Mx or more and, 0.4 Mx or more, 0.5 Mx or more, 0.6 Mx or more, 0.7 Mx or more, 0.8 Mx or more, 0.9 Mx or more). On the other hand, My in certain embodiments can be equal to 1.1 Mx or larger (e.g., 1.5 Mx or larger, in the range from 2 Mx to 10 Mx). My can be about 800 mm or less (e.g., 700 mm or less, 600 mm or less, 500 mm or less, 400 mm or less, 300 mm or less, 200 mm or less, 100 mm or less).
The mirrors of the projection objective can be arranged so that the optical axis 2105 intersects the mirror, but also in such a way that the optical axis 2105 does not intersect the mirror.
Depending on the design, the projection objective 2100 can generally comprise mirrors of different shapes and sizes. In some example, the maximum dimension D of each mirror of the projection objective can be 1000 mm or less, in particular 900 mm or less (e.g., 800 or less, 700 mm or less).
In general, the shape of the field of the projection objective 2101 can vary.
Generally speaking, for other field shapes such as for example a rectangular field, the projection objective 2101 can have a maximum field dimension or field measurement in the image plane 2102 of more than 1 mm (e.g., more than 3 mm and, more than 4 mm, more than 5 mm, more than 6 mm, more than 7 mm, more than 8 mm, more than 9 mm, more than 10 mm, more than 11 mm, more than 12 mm, more than 13 mm, more than 14 mm, more than 15 mm, more than 18 mm, more than 20 mm, more than 25 mm, more than 30 mm).
In general, the projection objective 2101 can be optimized and analyzed by using commercially available optical design programs such as ZEMAX, OSLO, Code V. After the wavelength, the field size and the numerical aperture have been defined at the outset, the optical properties can be optimized which are needed in a projection objective, such as for example the wave front aberration, the telecentricity, the uniformity as well as the distortion and the image field curvature. In the following, examples for realizing the disclosure will be described in detail with optical data. All optical data presented herein are given in Code F format.
If the field raster elements have the shape of the field to be illuminated, as shown in the illustrated examples, it is not necessary to provide a mirror for the shaping of the field.
In the object plane 20 of the microlithography projection exposure apparatus, a reticle is arranged on a transport stage 19. The reticle which is arranged in the object plane 20 is projected by mans of the projection objective 1 onto a light-sensitive substrate 22, for example a wafer, which is likewise arranged on a carrier stage 23. The projection objective shown here comprises six mirrors, i.e. a first mirror S1, a second mirror S2, a third mirror S3, a fourth mirror S4, a fifth mirror S5, and a sixth mirror S6, in an arrangement that is centered in relation to a common optical axis HA. The projection objective 1 has a negative back focus of the entry pupil. The second facetted optical element 15 of the illumination system is arranged in or near the plane of the associated mirrored entry pupil RE.
As can be seen clearly in
Also shown in
As can be clearly seen, no intermediate image is formed in the light path from the object plane 100 to the image plane 102 in the projection objective shown in
It can further be seen in
The distance DIS is defined as the distance between the back surface of the mirror in the first partial system PART1 with the largest distance from the object plane 100 and the back surface of the mirror in the second partial system PART2 with the largest distance from the image plane 102. In the present case, it is the distance between the back surface of the first mirror S1 and the back surface of the fourth mirror S4.
The distance between the object plane 100 and the image plane 102 is 1500 mm, the maximum mirror diameter, i.e. the maximum dimension My of all mirrors as measured in the meridional section is 131 mm, and the maximum mirror diameter of all mirrors as measured in the x-direction, i.e., the maximum dimension Mx, is 370 mm.
In the sequence from the first mirror S1 to the second mirror S2, the third mirror S3, the fourth mirror S4, the fifth mirror S5, and the sixth mirror S6, the respective mirror curvatures are N-P-P-N-N-P, which means convex-concave-concave-convex-convex-concave.
The principal ray angle γ in the first embodiment, i.e. the angle of the principal ray CR associated with the central field point of the field in the object plane 100 is γ=7° in relation to the surface-normal direction. The distance of the central field point from the optical axis is 132 mm. Based on these data, it can be calculated that the mirrored entry pupil RE has a maximum distance of 1075 mm from the object plane. The optical data of the embodiment shown in
The principal ray angle at the central field point is γ=7° at the object, and the distance of the central field point from the optical axis is 159 mm. The mirrored entry pupil RE in the plane 103 has an axial distance A2 of 1295 mm from the object plane 100. Components that are analogous to those in
As can be seen in
The second embodiment likewise comprises two partial systems, i.e. a first partial system PART1 and a second partial system PART2, at a distance DIS from each other.
The system data in Code V format for the second embodiment according to
The projection exposure apparatus shown in
The illumination of the microlithography projection exposure apparatus shown in
In the following embodiments of microlithography projection objectives with negative back focus of the entry pupil according to
In the example shown in
The distance between the object plane and the image plane is 1550 mm.
The optical data of the example of
second mirror S2—fourth mirror S4—first mirror S1—third mirror S3.
Furthermore common to both of the systems of
The optical data of the embodiment according to
The embodiment of
fourth mirror S4—second mirror S2—first mirror S1—third mirror S3.
Compared to the embodiment of
The following
In the illumination systems of the known state of the art, the projection objectives mostly have a positive back focus of the entry pupil. In projection systems that have projection objectives with a positive back focus, the optical elements such as for example a holographic diffuser or also a second facetted optical component of an illumination system which is configured as a double-facetted system cannot be placed in the entry pupil of the projection objective, but are projected as images by means of optical elements into an entry pupil that is located after the object plane in the light path from a light source to an image plane.
In a projection objective with a negative back focus of the entry pupil, the mirrored entry pupil is located to the image side of the object plane in which for example the reflective reticle is arranged. In these systems, an optical integrator such as for example a diffuser, or also the pupil facet mirror in a double-facetted illumination system, can be arranged in or near the mirrored entry pupil RE.
A first embodiment of a system of this type is shown in
In the light path from the light source to the first facetted element, a first intermediate image IMI is formed in the illumination ray path in the illustrated embodiment. The optical components which are located in the illumination ray path before the intermediate image IMI, i.e. the light source 1004, the collector 1002, as well as the normal-incidence mirror 1008 are combined in a first space 1020. This first space 1020 is separated from the rest of the components by a screen with only a single opening 1022, which is substantially where the intermediate image IMI is located. The first facetted optical component includes a mirror, the so-called field facet mirror 1024 with a large number of field facets which in the present example have the same shape as the field to be illuminated in the object plane. The field facets are therefore configured with an arcuate shape. As an option for adjusting the setting of the illumination, the field facet mirror 1042 can be exchanged for another field facet mirror. One possibility for the way in which one facet mirror can be exchanged for another consists for example in putting field facet mirrors with different facet arrangements on a component that is capable of swiveling about an axis.
The field facet mirror 1024 disassembles the incident light bundle into a large number of light bundles which are associated with the individual field facets. Each light bundle associated with a field facet forms a secondary light source. Arranged at or near the location of the secondary light source is the second facetted optical element, either in or close to the plane in which the mirrored entry pupil RE of the projection objective is located. The second facetted optical element is also referred to as pupil facet mirror 1026, and the raster elements arranged on it are referred to as pupil facets. Like the field facet mirror, the pupil facet mirror 1026 also comprises 200 to 300 facetted elements, in this case pupil facets. The individual pupil facets can be configured to be switchable to allow an adjustment of the setting. In the area that is not being used, the pupil facet mirror can have cutouts, so that the path of light propagation is not impeded in the projection objective. In order to suppress scattered light and keep it from entering the projection objective, there is a screen 1030 arranged above the facet mirror. As an alternative to a setting adjustment by means of a change in the channel assignment, it is also possible to set an aperture stop in place before the pupil facet mirror, which is however not illustrated in the present embodiment.
As a rule, the diffuser 2002 is configured as a diffuser mirror with 500 to 1000 small mirror facets or, alternatively, as a holographic lattice grid.
As shown in
The system of
In order to make a setting with σ>1 possible, it is advantageous to fold the light path in the illumination system, for example by means of a planar mirror. This is demonstrated in the system in
As an option, the folding mirror 2008 can be a mirror with refractive power. In the system shown in
The illumination system of this microlithography projection exposure apparatus includes a location-variant or a field dependent diffuser 3006. This diffuser 3006 is designed in such a way that it does not need to be arranged in the plane of the mirrored entry pupil or in a plane that is conjugate to the latter, but that it can be arranged in almost any arbitrarily selected plane. The diffuser comprises a large number of individual mirror facets, optionally more than 1000, which have deflecting angles that depend on the location where the diffuser is arranged in the illumination system, so that each facet receives light from the light source and directs the light to an assigned discrete point of a field (not shown) that is formed in the object plane 3007 of the illumination system. The discrete points in the object plane 3007 are selected so that a field in the object plane 3007 is illuminated in a predetermined, for example arcuate, shape. The facet is furthermore arranged in such a way that, with the respectively assigned discrete point of the field in the object plane, the facet will illuminate a specific area in a pupil plane of the projection objective.
The diffuser 3006 is also referred to as a so-called specular reflector. It is distinguished in particular by the fact that the facets differ in their sizes and positions as well as in their angles of inclination, where the angles of inclination are defined by the respectively associated field points. The specular reflector optionally has a substantially similar shape as the field to be illuminated. If the field to be illuminated has an arcuate shape, the specular reflector is kidney-shaped.
Due to the fact that the place for the location-variant or field dependent diffuser 3006 can be arbitrarily chosen in the design of the illumination system, it is therefore possible to select an optimal location for the diffuser 3006 independent of the layout of the rest of the system. The diffuser is arranged optionally in such way that the layout of the system is optimized and the diffuser has an optimal size. A system with a location-variant or field dependent diffuser 3006 is illustrated in
In the light path from the light source 3000 to the diffuser, the normal-incidence mirror 3004, which is placed before the diffuser 3006, has the task of acting as a filter for the light that falls on the location-variant or field dependent diffuser, as was described in the preceding examples. Based on this filtering effect, the location-variant or field dependent diffuser receives only usable radiation, specifically EUV light of a wavelength of 13.5 nm. This minimizes the radiation exposure load on the diffuser 3006, which has the result of a lower thermal stress load and a lower contamination.
The normal-incidence mirror 3004 can optionally be configured as a free-form surface with an extra-axial conical component. The function of a normal-incidence mirror of this kind is illustrated in
In
As an alternative to using a normal-incidence mirror, it is also possible to achieve a largely kidney-shaped illumination with a grazing-incidence mirror, for example with a shell of a grazing-incidence collector. Furthermore, the normal-incidence mirror can also have an optical function in addition to the illumination. The optical capability can be achieved by adding to the conical component a spherical, toroidal or generally aspherical component in order to give refractive power to the mirror.
In the system of
With the system according to
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of a system with a location-variant diffuser as shown in
A particularly simple illumination system with a location-variant or field dependent diffuser is shown in the example according to
The projection objectives according to
The present disclosure provides for the first time a projection objective with negative back focus of the entry pupil which is designed in such a way that a cross-over between the illumination light path and the image-projecting light path in a microlithography projection exposure apparatus is largely avoided. This, in turn, makes it possible to realize a modular design of the projection exposure apparatus.
In addition to the microlithography projection systems with negative back focus of the entry pupil which allow a modular design of the foregoing description to be realized, the disclosure also provides microlithography projection systems with a small number of optical components and with an image-side numerical aperture NA≧0.25 (e.g., A≧0.3) with a maximum dimension (Dx, Dy) of a field on the image side of more than 1 mm (e.g., more than 3 mm, more than 4 mm, more than 5 mm, more than 6 mm, more than 8 mm, more than 10 mm, more than 12 mm, more than 15 mm, more than 20 mm, more than 25 mm). In a system of this type, there are optionally ten or fewer normal-incidence reflections on optical elements between the light source and the image plane, wherein the reflection on the reflective object that is arranged in the object plane, specifically the reflective reticle, is not counted. The size of the image field can be for example 2×26 mm2. Particularly advantageous within this context are microlithography projection systems in which only one optical integrator is required. Among systems with only one optical integrator, a special advantage is held by those systems that are distinguished by the fact that the optical integrator can be placed at an arbitrarily chosen location in the microlithography projection exposure apparatus. Optical integrators which meet these requirements are in particular so-called location-variant or field dependent optical integrators or specular reflectors.
Singer, Wolfgang, Mann, Hans-Juergen
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
4650292, | Dec 28 1983 | POLAROID CORPORATION FMR OEP IMAGING OPERATING CORP | Analytic function optical component |
4655555, | Dec 03 1983 | Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung | Objective with aspheric surfaces for imaging microzones |
5003567, | Feb 09 1989 | Lawrence Livermore National Security LLC | Soft x-ray reduction camera for submicron lithography |
5063586, | Oct 13 1989 | AT&T Bell Laboratories | Apparatus for semiconductor lithography |
5071240, | Sep 14 1989 | Nikon Corporation | Reflecting optical imaging apparatus using spherical reflectors and producing an intermediate image |
5212588, | Apr 09 1991 | The United States of America as represented by the United States | Reflective optical imaging system for extreme ultraviolet wavelengths |
5309276, | Aug 29 1991 | Fujifilm Electronic Imaging Limited | Catoptric optical system including concave and convex reflectors |
5686728, | May 01 1996 | THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT | Projection lithography system and method using all-reflective optical elements |
5812309, | Aug 17 1993 | Steinheil Optronik GmbH | Infrared objective |
5815310, | Dec 12 1995 | ASML US, INC; ASML HOLDING N V | High numerical aperture ring field optical reduction system |
6033079, | Mar 15 1999 | EUV LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | High numerical aperture ring field projection system for extreme ultraviolet lithography |
6072852, | Jun 09 1998 | EUV LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | High numerical aperture projection system for extreme ultraviolet projection lithography |
6172825, | Sep 22 1998 | Nikon Corporation | Catoptric reduction projection optical system and projection exposure apparatus and method using same |
6195201, | Jan 27 1999 | ASML HOLDING N V | Reflective fly's eye condenser for EUV lithography |
6198793, | May 05 1998 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Illumination system particularly for EUV lithography |
6226346, | Jun 09 1998 | EUV LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Reflective optical imaging systems with balanced distortion |
6240158, | Feb 17 1998 | Nikon Corporation | X-ray projection exposure apparatus with a position detection optical system |
6244717, | May 30 1998 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Reduction objective for extreme ultraviolet lithography |
6266389, | Sep 14 1998 | Nikon Corporation | Method for manufacturing a device, an exposure apparatus, and a method for manufacturing an exposure apparatus |
6302548, | Sep 21 1998 | Nikon Corporation | Catoptric reduction projection optical system and exposure apparatus and method using same |
6318869, | Mar 15 1999 | EUV Limited Liability Corporation | High numerical aperture ring field projection system for extreme ultraviolet lithography |
6353470, | Feb 15 1999 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Microlithography reduction objective and projection exposure apparatus |
6359678, | Nov 14 1997 | Nikon Corporation | Exposure apparatus, method for producing the same, and exposure method |
6426506, | May 27 1999 | EUV LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY | Compact multi-bounce projection system for extreme ultraviolet projection lithography |
6452661, | Feb 27 1998 | Nikon Corporation | Illumination system and exposure apparatus and method |
6512641, | Jun 08 1998 | Nikon Corporation | Projection exposure apparatus and method |
6549270, | Mar 31 1999 | Nikon Corporation | Exposure apparatus, exposure method and method for manufacturing devices |
6556648, | Nov 07 2000 | ASML NETHERLANDS B V | Lithographic apparatus, device manufacturing method, and device manufactured thereby |
6557443, | Sep 09 1999 | Bar feeder for machining center | |
6577443, | May 30 1998 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Reduction objective for extreme ultraviolet lithography |
6600552, | Feb 15 1999 | Carl-Zeiss SMT AG | Microlithography reduction objective and projection exposure apparatus |
6660552, | Jan 19 2001 | Silicon Light Machines Corporation | Reduced surface charging in silicon-based devices |
6666560, | May 01 2001 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Reflection type demagnification optical system, exposure apparatus, and device fabricating method |
6710917, | Oct 20 2000 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | 8-mirror microlithography projection objective |
6750948, | Oct 15 1999 | Nikon Corporation | PROJECTION OPTICAL SYSTEM, PROJECTION EXPOSURE APPARATUS HAVING THE PROJECTION OPTICAL SYSTEM, PROJECTION METHOD THEREOF, EXPOSURE METHOD THEREOF AND FABRICATING METHOD FOR FABRICATING A DEVICE USING THE PROJECTION EXPOSURE APPARATUS |
6850361, | Jun 10 1999 | Mitsubishi Denki Kabushiki Kaisha | Wide-angle catoptric system |
6867913, | Feb 14 2000 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | 6-mirror microlithography projection objective |
6894834, | Aug 16 2001 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Objective with pupil obscuration |
6902283, | Feb 15 1999 | Carl-Zeiss-Stiftung | Microlithography reduction objective and projection exposure apparatus |
6922291, | Feb 21 2003 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Catoptric projection optical system and exposure apparatus |
6929373, | Apr 11 2001 | MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC INDUSTRIAL CO , LTD | Reflection optical device and imaging apparatus comprising it, multi-wavelength imaging apparatus, and vehicle mounted monitor |
6947210, | Feb 07 2002 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Catoptric projection optical system, exposure apparatus and device fabrication method using same |
7114818, | May 06 2004 | Olympus Corporation | Optical system, and electronic equipment that incorporates the same |
7224441, | Mar 01 2005 | Canon Kabushiki Kaisha | Projection optical system, exposure apparatus, and device manufacturing method |
7414781, | Sep 13 2005 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Catoptric objectives and systems using catoptric objectives |
7719772, | Sep 13 2005 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Catoptric objectives and systems using catoptric objectives |
7869138, | Mar 27 2006 | Carl Zeiss SMT AG | Projection objective and projection exposure apparatus with negative back focus of the entry pupil |
8094380, | Mar 27 2006 | Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH | Projection objective and projection exposure apparatus with negative back focus of the entry pupil |
20010002155, | |||
20010038446, | |||
20010043391, | |||
20020012100, | |||
20020171048, | |||
20030076483, | |||
20030147131, | |||
20040070743, | |||
20040114217, | |||
20040165255, | |||
20040165282, | |||
20040189968, | |||
20040252358, | |||
20050036213, | |||
20050088760, | |||
20050134980, | |||
20060209302, | |||
20060232867, | |||
20060284113, | |||
20070195317, | |||
20070223112, | |||
20090262443, | |||
20110063596, | |||
DE102005042005, | |||
DE10212405, | |||
DE10359576, | |||
DE3343868, | |||
EP730169, | |||
EP730179, | |||
EP730180, | |||
EP730513, | |||
EP779528, | |||
EP1069448, | |||
EP1093021, | |||
EP1199590, | |||
EP1225481, | |||
EP1333260, | |||
EP1335228, | |||
EP1335229, | |||
EP1376191, | |||
EP1434093, | |||
EP1450196, | |||
EP1450209, | |||
EP1494056, | |||
JP11110791, | |||
JP2000031041, | |||
JP2002139672, | |||
JP2003107354, | |||
JP2003114387, | |||
JP2003222572, | |||
JP2003233002, | |||
JP2004029625, | |||
JP2004170869, | |||
JP2004214242, | |||
JP2004258541, | |||
JP2004512552, | |||
JP2004516500, | |||
JP2004525398, | |||
JP2005055553, | |||
JP2005166778, | |||
JP2005258457, | |||
JP3041328, | |||
JP7036959, | |||
JP7283116, | |||
TW200417758, | |||
TW226938, | |||
TW476943, | |||
TW594043, | |||
WO248796, | |||
WO2004010224, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 06 2011 | Carl Zeiss SMT GmbH | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 01 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 01 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 01 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 01 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 01 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 01 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 01 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 01 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 01 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 01 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 01 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 01 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |