The present invention discloses a container sorting system capable of increased sorting efficiency. The present invention discloses a device in which the distance is shortened between detection and ejection of containers being sorted by reflective infrared radiation, transmission infrared radiation, or both. The present invention also includes a method of operating such device.

Patent
   8692148
Priority
Jul 19 2010
Filed
Jul 14 2011
Issued
Apr 08 2014
Expiry
Jan 09 2032
Extension
179 days
Assg.orig
Entity
Small
17
44
window open
1. A method of sensing and sorting materials according to composition, comprising:
providing a sample;
placing the sample on a conveyor having a discharge end;
placing the sample in an infrared radiation sensing region, wherein the infrared radiation sensing region is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor;
irradiating the sample to be sorted with infrared radiation in the sensing region;
detecting infrared radiation signals reflected off the sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor;
analyzing the infrared radiation signals to determine composition of the sample;
energizing at least one air ejector of an air ejection array, wherein the air ejection array is located immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing region.
9. A sorting device for sorting materials according to composition, comprising:
an infrared radiation source;
a conveyor, wherein the conveyor has a discharge end;
an infrared radiation sensing system positioned to receive and detect infrared radiation reflected off a sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the infrared radiation source;
a processing system operationally connected to the infrared radiation sensing system so that the detected infrared radiation signals are analyzed to determine composition of the sample;
an ejection system operationally connected to the processing system so that a sample having a certain composition may be ejected out of the flow path, wherein the ejection system is positioned immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system;
a receiving station positioned to receive ejected sample.
5. A sorting device for sorting materials according to composition, comprising:
an infrared radiation source;
a conveyor, wherein the conveyor has a discharge end;
an infrared radiation sensing system positioned to receive and detect infrared radiation reflected off a sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the infrared radiation source;
a first processing system operationally connected to the infrared radiation sensing system so that the detected infrared radiation signals are analyzed to determine composition of the sample;
an ejection system positioned immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system;
a second processing system operationally connected to the ejection system so that sample having certain composition may be ejected out of the flow path by the ejection system;
a receiving station positioned to receive ejected sample.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the infrared radiation sensing region is located at a minimal distance from the discharge end of the conveyor.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the air ejection array is located at a minimal distance downstream from the infrared radiation sensing region.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising detecting infrared radiation signals transmitted through the sample while the sample is in the sensing region.
6. The device of claim 5, wherein the infrared radiation sensing system is located a minimal distance downstream from the discharge end of the conveyor.
7. The device of claim 5, wherein the ejection system is located a minimal distance downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system.
8. The device of claim 5, wherein the first processing system and the second processing system are combined into a single processing system.
10. The device of claim 9, further comprising a transmission infrared radiation source positioned so that the infrared radiation sensing system receives and detects infrared radiation transmitted through the sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the transmission infrared radiation source.

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/399,865, filed Jul. 19, 2010, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Improving Performance in Container Sorting” which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

Be it known that we, Edward J. Sommer, Jr., a United States citizen, residing at 5329 General Forrest Court, Nashville, Tenn. 37215, R. Lynn Conley, a United States citizen, residing at 8045 Maggie Court, Antioch, Tenn. 37013, and Robert H. Parrish, a United States citizen, residing at 8029 Settlers Way, Nashville, Tenn. 37221, have invented a new and useful “Method and Apparatus for Improving Performance in Container Sorting.”

Not applicable

Not applicable

As the general public continues to increase its willingness to recycle, there are a variety of reasons that would lead to the desire for a container sorting system having improved efficiency. Currently available sorting system are plagued with many shortcomings. Traditional sorting systems use sensing devices which are bulky and have traditionally been configured to sort materials with a conveyor belt as a backdrop. Sensing systems in this configuration receive signals from the conveyor belt as well as from the items to be sorted which can complicate the identification of items. The traditional configuration of sorting systems also has resulted in a significant distance being present between the sensing region and the sorting region of a system. Given that many of the items being sorted are light weight cylindrically shaped bottles, one can imagine the movement of such individual items on the surface of a rapidly moving conveyor belt. Unfortunately, such lateral movement and variations in acceleration result in a complicated and hard to predict path of travel for such an item as it passes from a sensing region over a significant distance to a sorting region. If the item does not reach the sorting region at the time and location at which it is expected, then the sorting system has failed. The result is that sorting is not being performed in an efficient manner.

Disclosed herein is a container sorting system capable of improved sorting efficiency. As further described herein, the present invention eliminates interference signals from a conveyor belt and also allows for the distance between the sensing region and ejection region of the system to be only a minimal distance. Also disclosed herein is a method of sorting containers by use of the disclosed device.

The sorting device for sorting materials according to composition includes an infrared radiation source, a conveyor, wherein the conveyor has a discharge end, an infrared radiation sensing system positioned to receive and detect infrared radiation reflected off a sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the infrared radiation source, a first processing system operationally connected to the infrared radiation sensing system so that the detected infrared radiation signals are analyzed to determine composition of the sample, an ejection system positioned immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system, a second processing system operationally connected to the ejection system so that sample having certain composition may be ejected out of the flow path by the ejection system, and a receiving station positioned to receive ejected sample. In certain embodiments, the infrared radiation sensing system is located a minimal distance downstream from the discharge end of the conveyor. In other embodiments, the ejection system is located a minimal distance downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system. In yet other embodiments, the first processing system and the second processing system are combined into a single processing system. Also disclosed herein is a sorting device for sorting materials according to composition which includes an infrared radiation source, a conveyor, wherein the conveyor has a discharge end, an infrared radiation sensing system positioned to receive and detect infrared radiation reflected off a sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the infrared radiation source, a processing system operationally connected to the infrared radiation sensing system so that the detected infrared radiation signals are analyzed to determine composition of the sample, an ejection system operationally connected to the processing system so that a sample having a certain composition may be ejected out of the flow path, wherein the ejection system is positioned immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing system, and a receiving station positioned to receive ejected sample. In certain embodiments, the device further includes a transmission infrared radiation source positioned so that the infrared radiation sensing system receives and detects infrared radiation transmitted through the sample while the sample is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor and is irradiated with infrared radiation from the transmission infrared radiation source.

Also disclosed herein is a method of sensing and sorting materials according to composition which includes providing a sample, placing the sample on a conveyor having a discharge end, placing the sample in an infrared radiation sensing region, wherein the infrared radiation sensing region is located immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor, irradiating the sample to be sorted with infrared radiation in the sensing region, detecting infrared radiation signals reflected off the sample while the sample is in the sensing region, analyzing the infrared radiation signals to determine composition of the sample, and energizing at least one air ejector of an air ejection array, wherein the air ejection array is located immediately downstream from the infrared radiation sensing region. In certain embodiments, the infrared radiation sensing region is located at a minimal distance from the discharge end of the conveyor. In other embodiments, the air ejection array is located at a minimal distance downstream from the infrared radiation sensing region. In still other embodiments, the method further includes detecting infrared radiation signals transmitted through the sample while the sample is in the sensing region.

Accordingly, one object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system having only a minimal distance between the sensing region and the ejection region.

Another object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system having an improved sorting efficiency. Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system that minimizes interference signals from a conveyor belt surface.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method of sorting containers that does not require regular cleaning of a conveyor belt surface.

Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method of sorting containers that does not pose a fire hazard to the facility in which the sorting system is located.

Still another object of the present invention is to provide a sorting system having the capability to sort with reflected infrared radiation, transmission infrared radiation, or both.

FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a side view of a currently available sorting system. Shown therein is the traditional positioning of a sensing region on a conveyor which is separated by a significant distance (“D”) from the ejection region.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a top view of the sorting system shown in FIG. 1. Shown therein is a flaw of the traditional system in that the distance between the sensing region and the ejection region is long enough to allow an item being sorted to move along its actual path (solid arrow) rather than its expected path (dashed arrow) such that the item is not properly sorted. The shaded ejector represents the ejector that was fired to sort the item.

FIG. 3 is a schematic drawing of a side view of an embodiment of the sorting system disclosed herein. Shown therein is a conveyor transporting a sample to be sorted in the direction of the arrow. The vertical dashed lines represent the locations of the sensing region and the ejection region, being separated by a distance (“D”). The sensing region is immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor. The ejection region is only a matter of inches away from the sensing region.

FIG. 4 is a schematic drawing of a top view of the embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 3. Phantom lines are used to show the boundary of the conveyor and the ejectors which are located beneath the infrared radiation sensing system. Shown therein is an actual path of travel (solid arrow) of an item being sorted and an expected path of travel (dashed arrow) of that same item. The invention disclosed herein provides an improved sorting efficiency because of the small distance between the sensing region and the ejection region which allows for a single ejector to be fired (shaded ejector) to correctly eject an item even through the item's actual travel path and its expected travel path are not the same.

FIG. 5 is a schematic drawing of a side view of another embodiment of the sorting system disclosed herein. Shown therein is a conveyor transporting sample to be sorted. The sensing region is immediately off the discharge end of the conveyor. This embodiment of the invention has a transmission infrared radiation source located beneath the discharge end of the conveyor in addition to the reflective infrared radiation source of the embodiment shown in FIG. 3. The ejection region is positioned to be only a matter of inches away from the sensing region, in relation to the sample flow path, which is represented by the direction of the arrow on the conveyor.

The present invention is an infrared radiation sorting system that overcomes the flaws of currently available reflective infrared sorting systems. The infrared radiation sorting system, referred to as the system 10, includes an infrared radiation source 12, conveyor 14, infrared radiation sensing system 16, first processing system 18, second processing system 20, an ejection system 22, and a receiving station 24. Also disclosed herein is a method of using the system 10 to more efficiently sort materials according to composition.

Currently available material sorting systems that operate in the near infrared range (1.0-2.5 microns) and sense infrared radiation reflected off a material item (such as a plastic bottle) operate in a configuration where the sensing system is positioned over a conveyor 14 belt, as best seen in FIG. 1. In this configuration samples 28 on the conveyor 14 pass under the sensing system 16 where they are irradiated with infrared radiation 36 from an infrared radiation source 12 and the sensing system 16 monitors the infrared radiation reflected 38 off the sample 28. Currently available systems are not desirable due to the distance between the infrared radiation sensing region and ejection region. That is, an item to be ejected must travel the distance (“D”) between detection in the sensing region and ejection location. Typically this distance can be several feet (e.g. 3-4 feet). An item to be ejected can roll, bounce, or otherwise be disturbed when being conveyed the distance from detection to ejection. Such disturbances can change the position and/or speed of the item causing problems in ejection. If the item is rolling then it can be conveyed at a speed different (generally slower) than the conveyor 14 belt speed causing it to arrive at the ejection location before or after the ejector is fired since the processor system 19 expects the item to be conveyed at the speed of the conveyor 14.

Another disadvantage of current systems is that if the conveyed item has a lateral velocity component then it can move into an adjacent region on the conveyor 14 belt upon arrival at the ejection location and be missed by the firing of the air ejectors in the ejection channel directly downstream along the item expected path of travel determined at the time of detection in the sensing region. Stated another way, as best seen in FIG. 2, there is an actual path of travel (shown by a solid arrow) of an item which differs from the expected path of travel (shown by a dashed arrow). The sorting system fires an ejector 23 at the expected time/location in order to separate the item by giving it a trajectory path 21 over the splitter 40. However, because the actual path of travel of the item to be ejected differs, the item passes over the ejector not fired 25. Referring back to FIG. 1, the significant distance between the location of detection and location of ejection results in less than optimal sorting.

Still another disadvantage of traditional sorting systems in recycling plants is that there is typically a build up of foreign materials (dirt, grime, liquids, bottle labels, etc.) that occurs on a conveyor 14 belt during operation. This build up of foreign materials can interfere with the reflected infrared radiation signals 38 being received by the infrared radiation sensing system 16 and degrade sorting performance. Therefore, it is common for the belt surface to require periodic cleaning as a maintenance item—often once per shift. This cleaning requires manpower and time and is a maintenance cost. Also, in some sorting scenarios it is advantageous to determine color of item along with its infrared radiation signature. Many items to be sorted are transparent such as those made from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) or polystyrene (PS). The transparent item may have a color to it such as a green, blue, or amber PET bottle (for example). This color of a transparent item can be difficult for a sensing system 16 to distinguish if the item is on a conveyor 14 belt surface since the belt surface can be seen through the transparent item. For example, it can very hard to “see” the color of a PET bottle on a black conveyor 14 belt surface when lighted from above, especially “clear” bottles or lightly colored bottles such as light blue bottles. Additionally the build up of foreign materials on the belt can interfere with the color analyses degrading color sorting performance. Finally, the infrared radiation source 12 used in these systems is typically one or two banks of highly intense tungsten halogen lamps, positioned on the upstream and/or downstream sides of the infrared radiation sensing system 16, as shown in FIG. 1, with a very bright light output that has a strong near infrared radiation presence in the radiation spectrum. These lighting systems can quickly cause a large heat build-up on the conveyor 14 belt surface and any items present if the conveyor 14 belt is stopped with the belt surface area in the irradiated region stationary while the lamps are energized. There have been reports of fires being started in recycling facilities by such circumstances.

Referring now to FIG. 3, there is an embodiment of the present invention. Shown there is a schematic diagram of a side view detailing the conveyor 14, which has a discharge end 26, that is moving in the direction of the arrow. Sample 28 is shown moving on the conveyor 14. After passing the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14, the sample 28 is positioned to receive infrared radiation 36 from the infrared radiation source 12. The spectral characteristics of the reflected infrared radiation signal 38 contains information specific to the material samples 28 irradiated. Commercially available software to analyze infrared signals is available from LLA Instruments GmbH, Berlin, Germany. Infrared radiation sources 12 suitable for this use can be obtained from General Electric Company, Fairfield, Conn., and are well known and generally commercially available in the art. Infrared radiation is reflected 38 off the sample 28 and detected by the infrared radiation sensing system 16. Infrared radiation sensing systems 16 may be obtained from LLA Instruments GmbH, Berlin, Germany, and are well known and generally commercially available in the art. The infrared radiation sensing system 16 is operationally connected to the first processing system 18. One of ordinary skill in the art is familiar with the manner of operationally connecting components in detection systems as disclosed herein. All such wires, cables, and the like, needed for such operational connectivity are well known in the art and generally commercially available. Regarding each component of the system 10 disclosed herein, operational connectivity includes any connections necessary for power, data or information transfer, or the like, for the operation of the specific device. One of ordinary skill in the art is familiar with such types of connections. Note that U.S. Pat. No. 6,610,981 issued to Sommer, Jr. on Aug. 26, 2003 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.

As further described below, the ejection system 22 is momentarily activated to eject an item selected for ejection after a delay time that depends upon the conveyor belt speed and the distance D between the sensing region and the ejection location. A typical application is the sorting of containers in a mixed recyclable container stream. The first processing system 18 is a microprocessor. Such a microprocessor may be a single microprocessor or a system of multiple microprocessors linked together to share computational tasks to enable high speed data processing. A suitable multiple microprocessor system is the Barcelona-HS available from Spectrum Signal Processing, Burnaby, Canada. The first processing system 18 is also operationally connected to a second processing system 20. Briefly, the ejection system 22 is controlled by the second processing system 20 which is responsive to information received from the first processing system 18. The second processing system 20 signals the ejection system 22 through connections 32 to selectively energize appropriate air ejectors within the ejection system 22 to deflect by short air blasts selected materials from the sample 28 flow. That is, the first processing system 18 provides and receives control signals to/from the infrared radiation sensing system 16 over an electrical/data connection 30. Data from the infrared sensing system 16 flows to first processing system 18 over connections 30 through an analog-to-digital conversion card so that digital data is presented to first processing system 18. A materials classification and sorting algorithm, or software, executes within the first processing system 18 to process the digital data and utilizes computer memory for storing data and accessing data during execution. According to results derived through executing the algorithm the second processing system 20 signals the ejection system 22, for example a bank of solid state relays such as those supplied by Opto22, Temecula, Calif., through DIO module to energize selected air ejectors within air ejector array of the ejection system 22. In practice it may be that the tasks performed by the first processing system 18 and the second processing system 20 may be performed by a single processor or a system of multiple processors. As best seen in FIG. 4, the ejection system 22 is positioned across the width of the trajectory path 42 of materials discharged off the end 26 of conveyor 14 and is an array of high speed air ejectors, such as the L2 series supplied by Numatics, Highland, Mich. The ejected item trajectory 42 results in the item passing over the splitter 40 and landing in a receiving station 44. In certain embodiments, a receiving station 44 may be an appropriately sized container for holding the sorted materials or a conveying system to remove ejected items from the sorting system 10. The materials of construction of the receiving station 44 are readily commercially available and well known in the sorting industry. Also, manufacturers are readily available for the manufacture of such goods, according to the known methods of manufacture within the industry. The user of the sorting system may chose through a standard control interface (not shown) alternate ejection settings, as would be know to those of ordinary skill in the art.

Still referring to FIG. 4, there is shown a schematic diagram of a top view of the system 10 disclosed herein. As shown therein, in certain embodiments of the invention, the infrared radiation sensing system 16 is positioned to receive reflected 38 infrared radiation as the sample 28 is located immediately off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. In other embodiments, the infrared radiation sensing system 16 is positioned to receive reflected 38 infrared radiation as the sample 28 is located a minimal distance downstream from the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. A minimal distance is from about one inch to about six inches. In another embodiment, a minimal distance is about two inches. Still referring to FIG. 4, the solid arrow represents the actual path of travel of a specific item, which is in contrast to the dashed line which represents the expected path of travel of the specific item. The visual shows that a shorter distance between infrared radiation sensing and ejection allows for a single ejector 34 to be in both paths. That is, even if the expected path of travel of an item differs from the actual path of travel, when the infrared radiation sensing and ejection occur within a minimal distance, the two paths do not have an opportunity to diverge in such a short distance. Accordingly, the single ejector 34 is fired and properly ejects the item for which paths of travel are shown. If the ejector system 22 is located a further distance from the position at which infrared radiation is detected, then there is not a single ejector that is on both the actual and expected paths of travel.

Referring now to FIG. 5, there is shown a schematic diagram of a side view of another embodiment of the present invention. Shown therein is a system 10 additionally having a transmission infrared radiation source 48 located in line with the infrared radiation sensing system 16. The system 10 is capable of detection by transmission infrared radiation, reflection infrared radiation, or both. Such an additional transmission infrared radiation source 48 enables operating in transmission mode where a transmitted infrared radiation signal 50 processed by the infrared radiation sensing system 16 passes through the sample 28 being sensed. Such transmission sensing can be advantageous for identifying composition of transparent/translucent items such as PET bottles, and “natural” (i.e., not pigmented) HDPE (high density polyethylene), PP (polypropylene), and PS (polystyrene) materials since infrared radiation passing through a material can exhibit superior absorption at the material's signature frequencies than for reflected infrared radiation from the surface of the material thereby providing improved identification of the material. Similar to the embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 3, the infrared radiation sensing system 16 shown in FIG. 5 is located immediately off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14 so that transmitted infrared radiation signal 50 may pass through sample 28 for detection by the sensing system 16. In alternate embodiments, rather than the transmission infrared radiation source 48 and sensing system 16 being located immediately off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14, they may be positioned a minimal distance downstream from the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. A minimal distance is from about one inch to about six inches. In another embodiment, a minimal distance is about two inches. In either embodiment, the conveyor 14 is not presented to the infrared radiation sensing system 16 as it was in previously existing units.

Still referring to FIG. 5, there is shown an embodiment of the present invention that uses a single processor system 46, rather than a combination of a first processing system 18 and a second processing system 20 and that performs tasks similar to those performed by first processing system 18 and second processing system 20. A single processor system 46 suitable for the current invention may be obtained from Dell, Round Rock, Tex. Such single processor systems 46 are known in the art and readily commercially available.

Disclosed herein is an embodiment of a method of sorting materials in order to overcome the above discussed disadvantages of the configuration shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, in addition to providing additional benefits. The method includes the use of a device having the infrared radiation sensing system 16 moved to a position off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. An infrared radiation source 12 (reflection infrared radiation source, shown in FIG. 3) has been developed that provides focus of the impinging infrared radiation 36 into a narrow band that does not strike the conveyor 14 and that illuminates items to be sorted within the sensing region. The ejection system 22 is positioned a short distance downstream from the sensing region. In certain embodiments of the present invention, a short distance is about six inches, so that items to be ejected travel only the 6 inches before they are ejected over the splitter 40 and segregated from the main material flow.

This method has several advantages over currently available sorting methods. First, as described above, the shorter travel distance D compared to the traditional method of using the device shown in FIG. 1 minimizes effects upon ejection accuracy due to changes in sample 28 speed with respect to conveyor 14 speed due to bouncing, rolling, and the like. The detrimental effect on ejection timing due to changes in speed gets worse over time since the sample 28 gets further and further away from the target arrival time at the ejection system 22. The short distance of the presently disclosed invention minimizes the time from detection to ejection, thus minimizing the detrimental effect.

Second, the short travel distance D provided in the currently disclosed method of using the device disclosed herein as compared to the traditional method of using the device shown in FIG. 1 minimizes effects upon ejection accuracy due to lateral motion of an item to be ejected. The time from detection to ejection is considerably shortened by using the device shown in FIG. 3, as compared to using the device shown in FIG. 1, which minimizes the amount of time that an item to be ejected strays out of its expected path before ejection.

Third, build up of foreign materials on the conveyor 14 do not interfere with the infrared radiation signals 38 being received by the infrared radiation sensing system 16 since the conveyor 14 surface is no longer presented to the infrared radiation sensing system 16. Fourth, interference of the conveyor 14 surface with color determination of transparent items (e.g., PET bottles) is eliminated since the sample 28 being sensed is no longer on the conveyor 14 surface and instead is located off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. Fifth, the potential for fire resulting from the intense radiation from the infrared radiation source 12 is minimized since the infrared radiation 36 emanating from the source 12 is directed into the “free air” sensing region, which is off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. In the event the conveyor 14 stops, sample 28 will not stop suspended in air in the sensing region but will pass on through due to its intrinsic trajectory. Therefore, there will be no conveyor 14 surface or stationary sample 28 in the irradiated sensing region while the conveyor 14 is stopped or at any other time. Finally, another advantage to the method disclosed herein is the ability to add a transmission infrared radiation source 48 below the sample 28 feed stream as it discharges off the discharge end 26 of the conveyor 14. In the examples shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 it is not possible to add a transmission infrared radiation system for sensing at the same location along the sample 28 path of travel as is located the reflection infrared sensing system 16 since the conveyor belt is in the way.

This patent application expressly incorporates by reference all patents, references, and publications disclosed herein.

Although the present invention has been described in terms of specific embodiments, it is anticipated that alterations and modifications thereof will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as covering all alterations and modifications that fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.

Sommer, Jr., Edward J., Parrish, Robert H., Conley, R. Lynn

Patent Priority Assignee Title
10082467, Mar 15 2013 Altria Client Services LLC Menthol detection on tobacco
10209201, May 26 2011 Altria Client Services LLC Oil detection process and apparatus
10330607, May 26 2011 Altria Client Services LLC Oil detection process and apparatus
10488386, Nov 11 2014 ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES INC Method for detecting oil on tobacco products and packaging
10724955, Mar 15 2013 Altria Client Services LLC Menthol detection on tobacco
10782279, Nov 11 2014 ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES INC Method for detecting oil on tobacco products and packaging
10866194, May 26 2011 ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES INC Oil soluble taggants
10900897, May 29 2012 Altria Client Services LLC Oil detection process
11340168, Mar 15 2013 Altria Client Services LLC Menthol detection on tobacco
11549932, Nov 11 2014 Altria Client Services LLC Method for detecting oil on tobacco products and packaging
11555790, May 26 2011 Altria Client Services LLC Oil soluble taggants
9114433, Jan 17 2012 Mineral Separation Technologies, Inc.; MINERAL SEPARATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC Multi-fractional coal sorter and method of use thereof
9381545, Mar 15 2013 Altria Client Services LLC On-line oil and foreign matter detection system and method
9488580, Mar 15 2013 Altria Client Services LLC Menthol detection on tobacco
9546966, May 26 2011 Altria Client Services LLC Oil detection process, apparatus and taggant therefor
9656302, Mar 14 2013 Finatec Holding AG Device and method for transporting and examining fast-moving objects to be treated
9733197, May 26 2011 Altria Client Services LLC Oil detection process and apparatus
Patent Priority Assignee Title
4090074, Oct 29 1975 Australian Atomic Energy Commission Analysis of coal
4377392, Mar 06 1980 L G MASSEY Coal composition
4486894, Aug 07 1979 COAL INDUSTRY PATENTS LTD Method of and apparatus for sensing the ash content of coal
4626688, Nov 26 1982 Board of Trustees of The University of Alabama Split energy level radiation detection
4848590, Apr 24 1986 LAMB, HELEN M ; KELLY, MOIRA F Apparatus for the multisorting of scrap metals by x-ray analysis
5176260, Sep 28 1988 EXPORTECH COMPANY, INC Method of magnetic separation and apparatus therefore
5676256, Dec 30 1993 Huron Valley Steel Corporation Scrap sorting system
5738224, Oct 29 1990 National Recovery Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for the separation of materials using penetrating electromagnetic radiation
5818899, Apr 02 1997 McDermott Technology, Inc X-ray fluorescence analysis of pulverized coal
5841832, Feb 13 1991 Lunar Corporation Dual-energy x-ray detector providing spatial and temporal interpolation
5841833, Feb 13 1991 Lunar Corporation Dual-energy x-ray detector providing spatial and temporal interpolation
5931308, Jul 30 1997 Huron Valley Steel Corporation Eddy current separator and separation method having improved efficiency
6060677, Aug 19 1994 TiTech Visionsort AS Determination of characteristics of material
6122343, Apr 07 1995 Technological Resources Pty Limited Method and an apparatus for analyzing a material
6128365, Feb 11 1998 Analogic Corporation Apparatus and method for combining related objects in computed tomography data
6266390, Sep 21 1998 Spectramet, LLC High speed materials sorting using x-ray fluorescence
6272230, Feb 11 1998 Analogic Corporation Apparatus and method for optimizing detection of objects in computed tomography data
6338305, Apr 10 2000 On-line remediation of high sulfur coal and control of coal-fired power plant feedstock
6353197, Aug 19 1994 TiTech Visionsort AS Determination of characteristics of material
6399951, Feb 02 2000 UT-Battelle, LLC Simultaneous CT and SPECT tomography using CZT detectors
6519315, Sep 21 1998 Spectramet, LLC High speed materials sorting using x-ray fluorescence
6545240, Feb 16 1996 Huron Valley Steel Corporation Metal scrap sorting system
6587575, Feb 09 2001 PROVISION TECHNOLOGIES DIVISION INSTITUTE FOR TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT` Method and system for contaminant detection during food processing
6610981, Apr 27 2000 National Recovery Technologies, LLC Method and apparatus for near-infrared sorting of recycled plastic waste
6661867, Oct 19 2001 Technology Asset Trust Tomographic scanning X-ray inspection system using transmitted and compton scattered radiation
6855901, Apr 20 2001 National Recovery Technologies, LLC Process and apparatus for spectroscopic identification and sorting of barrier materials
6888917, Sep 21 1998 Spectramet, LLC High speed materials sorting using x-ray fluorescence
7012256, Dec 21 2001 National Recovery Technologies, LLC Computer assisted bag screening system
7099433, Mar 01 2004 Spectramet, LLC Method and apparatus for sorting materials according to relative composition
7200200, Sep 04 2001 INDUTECH PROCESS CONTROL, INC X-ray fluorescence measuring system and methods for trace elements
7244941, Dec 21 2001 National Recovery Technologies, LLC Computer assisted bag screening system
7262380, Aug 19 1994 TiTech Visionsort AS Determination of characteristics of material
7286634, Dec 23 2002 National Recovery Technologies, LLC Method and apparatus for improving baggage screening examination
7356115, Dec 04 2002 VAREX IMAGING CORPORATION Radiation scanning units including a movable platform
7542873, May 28 2003 BM Alliance Coal Operations Pty Ltd; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Method and apparatus for determining particle parameter and processor performance in a coal and mineral processing system
7558370, Nov 07 2005 National Recovery Technologies, LLC Method and apparatus for improving identification and control of articles passing through a scanning system
7564943, Mar 01 2004 Spectramet, LLC Method and apparatus for sorting materials according to relative composition
7664225, Sep 29 2005 ELISABETH KATZ Process and device for the fast or on-line determination of the components of a two-component or multi-component system
7848484, Mar 01 2004 Spectramet, LLC Method and apparatus for sorting materials according to relative composition
20040066890,
20100185319,
20110116596,
RE36537, Oct 29 1990 National Recovery Technologies, Inc. Method and apparatus for sorting materials using electromagnetic sensing
RE37536, Nov 26 1982 UAB Research Foundation Split energy level radiation detection
//////////////
Executed onAssignorAssigneeConveyanceFrameReelDoc
Jul 14 2011National Recovery Technologies, LLC(assignment on the face of the patent)
Aug 17 2011CONLEY, R LYNNNATIONAL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0267790183 pdf
Aug 17 2011PARRISH, ROBERT H NATIONAL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0267790183 pdf
Aug 17 2011SOMMER, EDWARD J , JR NATIONAL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0267790183 pdf
Jun 28 2012NATIONAL RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES, INC National Recovery Technologies, LLCCERTIFICATE OF CONVERSION TO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY0312390703 pdf
Mar 26 2018National Recovery Technologies, LLCTRUE WEST CAPITAL PARTNERS FUND II, LPSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0453530387 pdf
May 01 2019Zero Waste Energy, LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0495130198 pdf
May 01 2019NIHOT RECYCLING TECHNOLOGY B V PNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0495130198 pdf
May 01 2019National Recovery Technologies, LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0495130198 pdf
May 01 2019Emerging Acquisitions, LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0495130198 pdf
Sep 20 2024National Recovery Technologies, LLCTRUE WEST CAPITAL PARTNERS FUND II, LPSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0686660550 pdf
Sep 20 2024Emerging Acquisitions, LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0686900685 pdf
Sep 20 2024National Recovery Technologies, LLCPNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0686900685 pdf
Sep 20 2024NIHOT RECYCLING TECHNOLOGY B V PNC Bank, National AssociationSECURITY INTEREST SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS 0686900685 pdf
Date Maintenance Fee Events
Nov 20 2017REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed.
Mar 01 2018M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity.
Mar 01 2018M2554: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity.
Sep 22 2021M2552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Yr, Small Entity.


Date Maintenance Schedule
Apr 08 20174 years fee payment window open
Oct 08 20176 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 08 2018patent expiry (for year 4)
Apr 08 20202 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4)
Apr 08 20218 years fee payment window open
Oct 08 20216 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 08 2022patent expiry (for year 8)
Apr 08 20242 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8)
Apr 08 202512 years fee payment window open
Oct 08 20256 months grace period start (w surcharge)
Apr 08 2026patent expiry (for year 12)
Apr 08 20282 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12)