processes for producing a composite material comprising three or more layers, including at least one internal layers that is a roll good element or an in situ produced nonwoven layer includes shaping an assembly of three or more layers into a wave-like form, with at least one of the internal layers being a roll good element or an in situ produced nonwoven layer, and subsequently activating the assembly to cause bonding of the layers and creation of a unitized composite material that, for example, has utility as a filter material.
|
3. A process for producing a composite material comprising shaping an assembly of three or more layers into a wave-like form, the assembly including at least one in situ produced nonwoven layer and at least one layer of loose fibers, and activating the shaped assembly to cause bonding of the layers and creation of a unitized composite material, in which a roll good fabric layer is between other layers of the assembly.
1. A process for producing a composite material comprising shaping an assembly of three or more layers into a wave-like form, the assembly including at least one previously made roll good fabric layer and at least one layer of loose fibers, and activating the shaped assembly to cause bonding of the layers and creation of a unitized composite material, in which the roll good fabric layer is between other layers of the assembly.
2. The process of
4. The process of
|
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/477,522, filed Jun. 3, 2009, now abandoned, entitled UNITIZED COMPOSITE FABRICS WITH CROSS MACHINE WAVE-LIKE SHAPING AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/811,978, filed Jun. 13, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,959,751, entitled UNITIZED COMPOSITE FABRICS WITH CROSS MACHINE WAVE-LIKE SHAPING AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME, which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) on U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/813,664, filed Jun. 14, 2006, entitled UNITIZED COMPOSITE FABRICS WITH CROSS MACHINE WAVE-LIKE SHAPING AND METHODS FOR MAKING SAME, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates to manufacture of unitized composite fabric structures with cross machine wave-like z-directional shaping which can be stretchable or inelastic and with variable wavelength and amplitude of the wave-like shaping optionally incorporating particles.
Nonwovens, films, textiles, papers and paperboard materials as normally manufactured are relatively smooth, flat-surfaced and uniform in density, and are thin compared to their length and width. Known methods for making thicker webs from relatively long fiber assemblies—such as for textiles, carded and spunbonded webs—generally involve the use of a mechanical device to conform a mat or assembly comprised of long fibers into the shape of repeating waves or rely on a controlled gap between stationary plates or moving belts where the mat or assembly is forced to buckle and pile up into a confined area producing a fabric of a different basis weight and optionally of lower or higher density than the equivalent flat material being treated. Bonded webs of long or continuous fiber assemblies, such as those commonly employed in carded webs or self bonded spunbond webs, are normally predominantly aligned in the machine direction and have some internal cohesion in the assemblies even prior to bonding. The fibers are generally longer than the wavelength of the desired wave-like shape.
When thicker structures are desired without increasing the amount of materials used, well-known mechanical shaping treatments, such as corrugation and pleating, are also commonly employed—often in conjunction with lamination—to make three-dimensionally raised arch-like structures from flat roll goods In both long fiber and shorter fiber processing techniques, other known technologies such, as creping, micro-creping, Micrexing and similar such processes, are commonly used to alter structures to produce more bulky and generally softer fabrics. Such treatments, especially when employing relatively short fibers—either during the fabric production process or as an additional post treatment process—may undesirably reduce the stiffness and other desirable properties, such as tensile strength and compression resistance, mostly because of the reduction in the fabric's fiber-to-fiber bond strength and internal cohesion such treatments generally cause.
In accordance with certain embodiments disclosed herein, processes are provided for producing a composite material having a combination of at least three layers, wherein at least one of the internal layers is a roll good element. Such processes involve shaping an assembly of three of more layers into a wave-like form, wherein at least one internal layer is a roll good element, and then activating the assembly to cause bonding of the layers and creation of a unitized composite material. In accordance with specific embodiments, the roll good element can be a meltblown, a spunbonded, a spunmelted, or a wet formed web.
In accordance with certain other embodiments, processes are provided for producing a composite material comprising three or more layers in which at least one internal layer is an in situ produced nonwoven layer. Such processes involve shaping an assembly of three or more layers into a wave-like form, wherein at least one of the internal layers is an in situ produced nonwoven layer, and then activating the assembly to cause bonding of the layers and creation of a unitized composite material. In specific embodiments, the in situ produced nonwoven is a meltblown, a spunbonded, or a spunmelted web.
In accordance with certain embodiments, a filter is provided which comprises a composite material made by a process comprising shaping an assembly of three or more layers into a wave-like form, with one of the internal layers being either a roll good element or an in situ produced nonwoven layer, and then activating the assembly to cause bonding of the layers and creation of a unitized composite material.
These and other features, advantages and objects of the present invention will be further understood and appreciated by those skilled in the art by reference to the following specification, claims and appended drawings.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings of which:
Although the invention is illustrated and described herein with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not intended to be limited to the details shown. Rather, various modifications may be made in the details within the scope and range of equivalents of the claims and without departing from the invention. Also, the embodiments selected for illustration in the figures are not shown to scale and are not limited to the proportions shown.
As used herein, the term “nonwoven” means a web having a structure made of individual fibers which are interlaid, but not in an ordered or identifiable manner such as occurs in a woven or knitted web. As defined by INDA, a trade association representing the nonwoven fabrics industry, nonwoven fabrics are generally fabric or web structures bonded together by entangling fibers or filaments (and by perforating films) mechanically, thermally or chemically.
Nonwoven webs are formed from many processes, such as, for example, airlaying, carding, meltblowing, spunbonding, spunmelting (a modified combination of meltblowing and spunbonding), co-forming, wet forming, scrim and netting extrusion, perforated films and other such processes. The term “airlaid” implies that a nonwoven web is formed by a dry air-laying process, which deposits assemblies of loose fibers on a substrate such as a porous collecting wire. The term “short fiber airlaid process” refers to a type of dry air-laying process which was originally developed to process relatively short wood pulp fibers for producing disposable fabrics, like high bulk towels and feminine napkin absorbent media. Typical machines used for an air-laying process are supplied by DanWeb A/S and Neumag Denmark A/S of Denmark.
As used herein, the term “bi-component fiber” or “multi-component fiber” refers to a fiber having multiple components, such as fibers comprising a core composed of one material (such as a polymer) that is encased within a sheath composed of a different material (such as another polymer with a different melting point). Some types of “bi-component” or “multi-component” fibers can be used as binder fibers that can be bound to one another and to other fibers or components to form a unitized structure. For example, in a polymeric fiber, the polymer comprising the sheath often melts at a different, typically lower, temperature than the polymer comprising the core. As a result, such binder fibers provide thermal bonding after appropriate activation, such as by heating in an oven and subsequent cooling, due to melting of the sheath polymer, while retaining the desirable fibrous structure characteristics of the core polymer. As an alternative to using a binder fiber, mono- and multi-component filaments, extrusions, films, scrims, nettings, particles, powders, emulsion polymers and resins in numerous chemistries can also be used to bond fibrous structures, in addition to mechanical bonding methods such as needlepunching and hydro-entangling.
Composite assemblies are optionally made by including other loose fiber assembly techniques, such as carding techniques, or by including direct process nonwovens methods, such as spunbonding, meltblowing, spunmelting, co-forming, extrusions, or with scrims and films or other techniques. These combinations in layered assemblies can be subsequently bonded together to produce a unitized composite structure using an oven or other activation step to cause the layers to adhere to each other becoming a unitized composite after bonding.
As used herein, the term “element” refers to one individual component of a structure, assembly, composite, or lamination, i.e., a layer, fiber, particle, filler, or any other component that can be incorporated (e.g., fusion bonded, adhesively bonded, physically bonded by entanglement or the like, or occluded within) into a unitized structure, assembly, composite, or lamination.
As used herein, the term “assembly” refers to a deposition of loose fiber elements or a layered combination of two or more elements of a structure.
As used herein, the terms “unitized structure” or “unitized composite” refer interchangeably to the structure resulting from bonding assemblies in an oven or other device which causes the layers of an assembly to bond together.
As used herein, the term “wave-like” is used to describe assemblies characterized by a substantially periodic waveform, but not necessarily sinusoidal, perfectly repeating, easily seen, or perfectly parallel, that may be further characterized in terms of wavelength and amplitude, the wavelength being the distance between repeating units of a wave pattern (e.g., measured from one crest to the next crest, or from one trough to the next trough) and the amplitude being the height of the undulations. Alternatively, rather than characterizing the waveform in terms of wavelength, it may be characterized in terms of wavenumber, which is inversely related to wavelength and refers to the number of repeating units of a wave pattern per unit length. The wavenumber is the spacial analogue of frequency. The wave-like form need not be wave-like on both the top and bottom in the finished composite, nor perfectly recurring, i.e., there may be some change in size, shape or other variation of the generally recurring waveforms. Such wave-like form is depicted generally in an idealized form by 2100 in
As used herein, the term “activation” may be any process, whether with a heated oven, by radiation of electromagnetic energy, or by some other method, which causes bonding to occur between elements within one layer and/or causes bonding to occur between elements in two or more layers when cooled or otherwise removed from activation.
As used herein, the term “recipe” refers to a specific formula of a mixture of various components used in an assembly, including the type and amount of each component.
As used herein, the term “hydro-entangled” refers to treatment of the assembly by high-pressure water jets which rearranges the fibrous elements and causes entanglement of fibers and/or frictional bonding.
As used herein, the term “needle-punched” refers to treatment of the assembly by the use of barbed needles mounted in a needleloom to entangle an assembly by mechanical reorientation of some of the fibers within an assembly.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings of which;
Such assemblies of wave-like elements can be made directly by first assembling multi-layer depositions of elements, at least one of which can be made to bond to other elements in the assembly. A wave-like shaped assembly can also be a single layer.
A desirable attribute of the present invention described herein is the ability to easily alter the shapes, z-directional height, and repeating wavelength of the wave-like elements in a unitized composite without resorting to physical alteration or replacement of machinery components as is normally required, for example, in conventional shaping methods such as corrugation rolls, as used in known corrugation and lamination processes. Altering the wavenumber and amplitude of shaped structures using such conventional corrugating technology would require physically changing the shapes of the corrugation rolls to the desired shaping pattern of the desired waves. The present invention avoids such complications. The entire layered assembly is subjected to a shaping process using an optionally raised transfer device which forms the entire assembly into a three-dimensional wave-like shaping. The shaped assembly then passes through an oven or other activation step, causing the bondable elements to bond to other elements and to remain in the wave-like form when removed from the activation step.
The ability to easily alter the location, recipe and mass amounts of individual elements deposited to make a complex layered assembly is an advantage of the airlaid method of practice of the present invention. An advantage with certain embodiments of the present invention is the ability to accommodate a wide variety of raw materials and forms, such as irregular particles or agglomerates, in blended recipes as long as at least one element can be caused to substantially bond to the other elements in an assembly.
The invention can be accomplished in many basis weights, forms and element combinations as long as at least one element can be caused to bond to the other layers if present. The bonding of individual layers of elements to each other in an activated assembly is generally desirable, but is optional, depending on the selection of materials employed, and reduced bonding—or even the absence of bonding—between one or more layers in a unitized composite is contemplated as well.
While the exemplary methods of depositing elements of the layers used herein are short fiber airlaid forming methods, a wide variety of other assembly methods—and combinations with short fiber airlaid forming methods—are contemplated. Further, the specifics of any particular assembly methodology for depositing and layering the elements of an assembly prior to shaping and activation is not limited to the methods described herein, nor are the mass amounts and recipes of the individual layer elements used in individual layers.
By using an airlaid process for depositing various recipes (i.e., types and mass amounts) of fibrous elements according to aspects of this invention, it is possible to achieve a variety of unitized composite properties, strength characteristics, surface textures, elasticity and densities of the individual layers of an assembly based on selection of materials used, additives, and compression strategies used in depositing the layered assembly prior to shaping and activation. By employing multiple forming heads and separate fiber feeds using the airlaid forming process, maximum flexibility is provided in production of the desirable fabric product design, and rapid changes can easily be made to the formulas of individually deposited elements of an assembly during manufacture.
For example, the composite may have one basis weight of binder fibers in one layer and a different basis weight of fibers in another layer; indeed, the basis weight can be different in any or all of the layers assembled as desired. The mass amounts of materials in each layer, as well as the recipe and characteristics of the materials used, is optionally adjusted over a wide range to accommodate functional demands of the finished unitized composite and other design, cost or processing considerations. Further, unusual composites with dissimilar properties in the individual elements of an assembly can be easily made. Those layers are optionally adjusted individually for desired density using compression rolls located between the airlaid formers, which also affects behavior of the assembly in the shaping process and activation step.
Additionally, more expensive fiber layers can be positioned adjacent to less expensive ingredients concealed in other layers, and properties of the individual layers of an assembly can be selected according to the end-use property requirements, often using a lesser amount of materials to provide equivalent or superior functionality in the finished composite compared to separately made and subsequently combined structures.
Practitioners skilled in the art will recognize that the recipes of fiber blends, mass amounts of materials deposited in each layer, and the densities of individual layers deposited will affect the behavior of the individual layers during and following activation. The figures described herein demonstrate exemplary ways in which the density of individual layers can be optionally varied in the deposition process by using compression rolls positioned between the forming heads. Combinations with other potentially desirable materials—such as paper, textile or nonwoven webs, films or similar extruded or roll good systems (including direct process elements made simultaneously during the manufacture of airlaid assemblies)—can be made without departing from the spirit of the inventions. Indeed, such variations are contemplated as being desirable to take advantage of beneficial economics and processing advantages from commercially available roll goods or other assembly methods for elements that offer properties of technical interest.
Referring now to
Specifically,
Generally, each of the web-forming systems illustrated in
Referring specifically to
Further, skilled practitioners will appreciate that heated compression rolls will produce different results compared to unheated compression rolls, and that variations in the pressure employed in combination with the compression roll temperature will affect results in the following steps, such as shaping the assembly into wave-like shaping. The machine 1004a illustrated in
Referring now to
Referring next to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring now to
It is recognized that some materials (e.g., spunbond webs) are ubiquitous and inexpensive, both as separately produced roll goods and as web elements made in-situ during the manufacture of the assemblies incorporated simultaneously with the airlaying process. Accordingly, such materials may be beneficially used, preferably in conjunction with airlaid fibrous materials and optionally with the addition of particulate materials into the unitized composite structures.
The known techniques for shaping an assembly into wave-like forms as described in
The practice of the present invention avoids such limitations by exploiting the proven benefits of the short fiber airlaid process equipment's assembly transfer device, as normally used in flat roll goods production, to deliver a fragile assembly of loose fibers—intact—onto the oven wire which follows prior to bonding. By substantially deviating from the typical software and machinery conditions normally used to produce fragile, relatively flat assemblies and unitized composites, the ability of the transfer device to handle very fragile short fiber assemblies while also imparting raised, wave-like shaping to the assembly without disruption of the fragile assembly can be exploited.
In normal conventionally known operation of the airlaying technique employing a transfer device, the transfer device wire 3210 is raised only very slightly above the plane of the oven wire 3259 to a height approximately equal to the thickness of the loose fiber assembly, and both the transfer wire and oven wire travel at very similar relative speeds, producing a relatively flat unitized composite fabric typical of industry practice after activation and bonding in an oven or other activation device.
According to one aspect of the present invention, by optionally raising the height of the transfer device wire 3210 substantially higher in the z-direction compared to the oven wire 3259, and by substantially slowing down the speed of the oven wire relative to the transfer device wire, the material in the assembly is caused to pile up into a repeating wave-like shaping. A further benefit of this technique is immediate and simple machinery software setting adjustments to produce the desired amplitude and wavenumber imparted to the assembly by adjusting the transfer height and/or the speed of the transfer device relative to the oven wire speed using the machine control software settings.
Practitioners skilled in the art can appreciate that the overall shape of the wave, as well as the amplitude and wavenumber of wave-like shaping, can be adjusted over a wide range and can operate successfully on assemblies which vary widely in thickness and basis weights by employing variations in both the raised height of the transfer device and the relative speed of the transfer wire versus the oven wire. It is generally desired in commercial production to maximize the mass of deposited assemblies delivered from the deposition devices (forming heads) for maximized production at any desired basis weight of an assembly.
Further, it can be appreciated that for any given mass amount of an assembly supplied at a constant speed and constant mass to the transfer device, and with constant speeds of the transfer device relative to the oven wire, the amplitude and wavenumber or wavelengths of waves produced are related in a predictable fashion. For example, if the transfer height is increased, the amplitude will increase and the wavenumber of the waves will be reduced accordingly, if no other changes are made. Similarly, if the transfer height is reduced, the wavenumber of waves produced will increase to accommodate the mass being delivered by the incoming assembly to the transfer device. Therefore, one desirable aspect of the present invention employing the raised transfer device technique is the ability to change both the amplitude and the wavenumber or wavelengths of waves imparted to the assembly to the desired combination by changing both the height of the transfer device wire relative to the oven wire and also by independently changing the relative speed of the transfer device wire relative to the oven wire.
For example, referring to
Another attribute of certain embodiments of the present invention is of special advantage when very high-basis-weight unitized composites are required. In normal operation, the short fiber airlaid process limitations for production of very high basis weight composites become problematic to manufacture efficiently because the process depends on having sufficient vacuum available to condense and deposit the fibers out of the air used to transport the fibers to the forming heads. As more and more fiber deposition is required, eventually the amount of effectively available vacuum becomes insufficient, limiting the total achievable basis weight and limiting desired high throughput of all available forming heads. The present invention overcomes such limitations because the wave shaping process can greatly increase the basis weight and optionally the thickness of the unitized composite without requiring large amounts of air to be pulled through such an assembly. Therefore, higher final basis weights can be achieved while running the forming heads at optimum throughputs.
Another attribute of the present invention contemplates manufacture of relatively extensible elastic and also inelastic unitized composites by exploiting variations in the recipes used in the assemblies and the degree of bonding between individual waves in an activated assembly. The present invention contemplates variations in the degree to which individual waves in the unitized composite optionally bond to each other as a method to optionally produce extensible fabric with some elasticity in the unitized composite in the machine direction. Practitioners skilled in the art can appreciate that individual waves in a unitized composite, after activation, can be easily and substantially stretched with the application of a tensile force provided that the individual waves do not substantially bond to each other or provided that such bonds between waves can be broken after activation by a suitable process, such as controlled stretching. Such treated fabrics will elongate substantially in the MD direction when exposed to a tensile force and can be made to recover when the tensile force is removed.
Another embodiment of the present invention contemplates treatment of the shaped wave-like assembly prior to or after activation by mechanical processes, such as hydro-entangling or by needling, to produce novel structures with unusual surfaces, textures and physical properties in the unitized composites.
Another embodiment of the present invention contemplates the addition of particles into the unitized composites. Introduction of a wide variety of particles and other materials—either into the individual layers, between the individual layers, or on top of the shaped assembly—is also contemplated as being of special advantage in certain applications.
Practitioners will also appreciate that because of gravity and the optional use of a suction device below the particle application device, a uniform application of particles to a wave-like assembly 2802 will tend to cause the particles to concentrate in the lower areas 2804 of the wave-like shapes, as depicted in
The exemplary embodiments of the present invention are described in Table 1, demonstrating assembly element recipes and machinery settings appropriate to exemplary practice of the present invention. Exemplary embodiments are made with non-limiting reference to airlaying deposition of loose fiber assemblies using a typical through dryer oven for activation and bonding of the assemblies, and using a z-direction raised transfer wire device moving relatively faster than the oven wire following it, as generally depicted in
A suitable airlaid forming system for deposition of such loose fiber assemblies configured for manufacturing embodiments of the present invention is available for public use from Marketing Technology Service, Inc. of Kalamazoo Mich. USA and was employed to produce samples in Table 1, according to the recipes and using the specified machinery settings shown in Table 1.
The thermoplastic binder fibers used in the exemplary embodiments are typical bi-component bonding fibers available to the airlaid industry commercially, although many other fibers suitable for practice of the invention are available. Trevira T-255 grade of 1.55 denier is available for purchase from Trevira GmbH of Augeburg Germany. The length of the synthetic fiber was about six millimeters, although much longer and much shorter fibers are optionally selected for the practice of the present invention, and many types of fibers can be used as bonding fibers. The components useful for the practice of the present invention can be hydrophilic, hydrophobic or a combination of both hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials. Suitable fibers for use in the present invention include many cellulose fibers (such as wood pulp and cotton), modified cellulosic fibers (such as rayon and Lyocell), cellulose acetate, hemp, jute, flax, polyester, polypropylene, polyethylene, PLA and many other synthetic, mineral (e.g., glass), and natural materials which can be utilized alone or in blends with other nonfibrous materials. These components can also be blended together in a wide variety of recipes to achieve desired attributes.
Table 1 shows the grams per square meter of fibrous material deposited in the airlaid forming head during assembly, the compression roll conditions, the height of the raised transfer wire relative to the surface of the oven wire, and the speeds of the transfer wire and the oven wire. The formula and machinery conditions listed in Table 1 (including the raised transfer height and the relative speed of the transfer wire and oven wire) follow the teachings of an airlaid fibrous deposition configuration as generally illustrated in
TABLE 1
TRANSFER
SPEED
HEAD 1
COMPACTOR B
RAISED
TRANSFER
M/MIN
SAMPLE #
GSM FIBER
SETTING
HEIGHT MM
M/MIN
OVEN SPEED
1
60 Trevira
No heat
3.8 mm
10
8.5 (−15%)
0 Bar
2
60 Trevira
No heat
1.8 mm
10
8.5 (−15%)
0 Bar
3
60 Trevira
No Heat
1.8 mm
10
7 (−30%)
0 Bar
4
60 Trevira
No Heat
12.8 mm
10
7 (−30%)
0 Bar
5
60 Trevira
No Heat
9.3 mm
10
7 (−30%)
0 Bar
6
60 Trevira
No Heat
5.8 mm
10
5 (−50%)
0 Bar
7
60 Trevira
No Heat
9.3 mm
10
5 (−50%)
0 Bar
8
60 Trevira
No Heat
12.8 mm
10
5 (−50%)
0 Bar
9
60 Trevira
No Heat
9.3 mm
10
2.5 (−75%)
0 Bar
10
60 Trevira
No Heat
12.8 mm
10
2.5 (−75%)
0 Bar
11
60 Trevira
No Heat
3.8 mm
10
2.5 (−75%)
0 Bar
12
60 Trevira
No Heat
3.8 mm
10
5 (−50%)
0 Bar
13
60 Trevira
No Heat
12.8 mm
10
1 (−90%)
0 Bar
14
60 Trevira
No Heat
9.3 mm
10
1 (−90%)
0 Bar
15
60 Trevira
No Heat
3.8 mm
10
1 (−90%)
0 Bar
16
60 Trevira
No Heat
5.8 mm
10
5 (−50%)
No Compaction
17
60 Trevira
No Heat
3.8 mm
10
7 (−30%)
0 Bar
18
170 Trevira
No Heat
11.8 mm
4
2 (50%)
0 Bar
Table 2 shows unitized composite final basis weights and densities achieved with the conditions listed in Table 1.
TABLE 2
Sample
Raised Transfer
Oven Speed %
Basis Weight
#
Height mm
vs Transfer
Density g/cm3
gsm
1
3.8
−15
0.03
72
17
3.8
−30
0.02
95
12
3.8
−50
0.04
128
11
3.8
−75
0.04
254
15
3.8
−90
0.05
652
5
9.3
−30
0.01
94
7
9.3
−50
0.02
128
9
9.3
−75
0.03
221
14
9.3
−90
0.05
636
4
12.8
−30
0.01
83
8
12.8
−50
0.02
149
10
12.8
−75
0.03
250
13
12.8
−90
0.04
620
The testing apparatus for evaluating the tensile strength and extensibility for the data in Table 3 is a Thwing-Albert QC-1000 tensile tester model, commonly used to evaluate tensile strength of paper and other fabrics. A T-A Load Cell Model: RSB-1 with a capacity of 2000 grams is used. During the test, the load cell is first zeroed, and the test is initiated by causing the traveling support to descend to the breaking point, or to a maximum of 20 cm, at a rate of 7 cm/minute. The tensile strength and elongation is measured during the test and recorded in Table 3.
Table 3 shows tensile breaking force and elongation measurements in both the MD and CD directions, as well as the final basis weight, final thickness and final overall densities of the exemplary low density unitized composites according to the recipes and conditions described in Table 1. The data show that the MD elongation of unitized composites following the invention are more extensible in the machine direction than in the CD direction and can be made relatively low or very high.
TABLE 3
Final
MD
CD
Final
Basis
Tensile
Tensile
Elon-
Sample
Density
Weight
Breaking
Breaking
Elongation
gation
#
g/cm2
(gsm)
Force (kg)
Force (kg)
% (MD)
% (CD)
1
0.03
72
2.28
6.36
112
30
3
0.02
80
3.33
5.62
79
40
5
0.01
94
1.82
3.58
203
38
6
0.02
111
1.77
5.81
196
10
7
0.02
128
2.6
6.95
136
32
8
0.02
149
4.45
6.45
47
41
9
0.03
221
3.91
6.02
78
36
10
0.03
250
4.59
5.29
45
28
12
0.04
277
—
—
—
—
13
0.04
620
2.32
5.07
84
33
14
0.05
636
1.72
4.24
244
30
15
0.05
832
2.87
5.53
141
29
While some embodiments of the invention have been shown and described herein using the examples shown in Table 1, embodiments are provided by way of example only, in part because of the special flexibility of the present invention to easily produce an unusually wide variety of structures with numerous types of materials. Such flexibility ensures that other applications, variations, changes and substitutions will occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention.
The uses and benefits conferred by this invention are also applicable in many fields including, but not limited to, paper and nonwoven constructions, finished products for household consumer applications, absorbent media, building and construction materials, filtration media, automotive applications, fabrics for noise reduction and thermal insulation, cushioning materials for shipment of fragile items such as ripe fruits, decorative fabrics such as window coverings, structural composites of low density and high strength such as are required for aerospace applications, moldable substrates, specialty packaging, and many other finished and semi-finished fabric and composite applications. Indeed, the ability of the present invention to use a wide variety of expensive and inexpensive materials—including recycled material—to achieve lower density structures, as compared to relatively flat composites or laminates, without resorting to additional converting steps in manufacture is specifically envisioned as an advantage of the present invention.
The above description is considered that of the preferred embodiments only. Modifications of the invention will occur to those skilled in the art and to those who make or use the invention. Therefore, it is understood that the embodiments shown in the drawings and described above are merely for illustrative purposes and not intended to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the following claims as interpreted according to the principles of patent law, including the doctrine of equivalents.
Hanson, James P., Pio, Larry L.
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
Patent | Priority | Assignee | Title |
2409066, | |||
2500690, | |||
2862542, | |||
3012923, | |||
3180775, | |||
3214323, | |||
3616031, | |||
3616035, | |||
3949128, | Aug 22 1972 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation | Product and process for producing a stretchable nonwoven material from a spot bonded continuous filament web |
4111733, | Jul 23 1975 | UNIFOAM AG, A SWISS CORP | Method and apparatus for continuous manufacture of undulating or corrugated material |
5484645, | Jun 10 1992 | Fiberweb Holdings Limited | Composite nonwoven fabric and articles produced therefrom |
5491016, | Mar 15 1994 | FiberTech Group, Inc.; FIBERTECH GROUP, INC | Bulkable porous nonwoven fabric |
5558924, | Feb 26 1992 | SHINIH ENTERPRISE CO , LTD | Method for producing a corrugated resin-bonded or thermo-bonded fiberfill and the structure produced thereby |
6090469, | Apr 21 1995 | The University of Tennessee Research Corporation | Mechanically interlocked and thermally fused staple fiber pleated and non-pleated webs |
6635136, | Mar 30 2000 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Method for producing materials having z-direction fibers and folds |
6867156, | Apr 30 1999 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Materials having z-direction fibers and folds and method for producing same |
6867256, | Jul 17 1997 | Nyltech Italia | Thermoplastic copolyamide, composition based thereon |
6998164, | Apr 30 1999 | Glaxo Group Limited | Controlled loft and density nonwoven webs and method for producing same |
7045029, | May 31 2001 | Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc | Structured material and method of producing the same |
20030022584, | |||
20030203695, | |||
20030213109, | |||
20060042049, | |||
GB2145126, |
Executed on | Assignor | Assignee | Conveyance | Frame | Reel | Doc |
Dec 21 2011 | Marketing Technology Service, Inc. | (assignment on the face of the patent) | / |
Date | Maintenance Fee Events |
Dec 04 2017 | REM: Maintenance Fee Reminder Mailed. |
Dec 06 2017 | M2551: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 4th Yr, Small Entity. |
Dec 06 2017 | M2554: Surcharge for late Payment, Small Entity. |
Oct 21 2021 | BIG: Entity status set to Undiscounted (note the period is included in the code). |
Oct 22 2021 | M1552: Payment of Maintenance Fee, 8th Year, Large Entity. |
Oct 22 2021 | M1559: Payment of Maintenance Fee under 1.28(c). |
Mar 22 2022 | PTGR: Petition Related to Maintenance Fees Granted. |
Date | Maintenance Schedule |
Apr 22 2017 | 4 years fee payment window open |
Oct 22 2017 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 22 2018 | patent expiry (for year 4) |
Apr 22 2020 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 4) |
Apr 22 2021 | 8 years fee payment window open |
Oct 22 2021 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 22 2022 | patent expiry (for year 8) |
Apr 22 2024 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 8) |
Apr 22 2025 | 12 years fee payment window open |
Oct 22 2025 | 6 months grace period start (w surcharge) |
Apr 22 2026 | patent expiry (for year 12) |
Apr 22 2028 | 2 years to revive unintentionally abandoned end. (for year 12) |